1
|
Bhatt AA, Niell B. Tumor Doubling Time and Screening Interval. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:571-580. [PMID: 38777534 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The goal of screening is to detect breast cancers when still curable to decrease breast cancer-specific mortality. Breast cancer screening in the United States is routinely performed with digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. This article reviews breast cancer doubling time by tumor subtype and examines the impact of doubling time on breast cancer screening intervals. By the article's end, the reader will be better equipped to have informed discussions with patients and medical professionals regarding the benefits and disadvantages of the currently recommended screening mammography intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha A Bhatt
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Bethany Niell
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard MDC 44. Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mills C, Sud A, Everall A, Chubb D, Lawrence SED, Kinnersley B, Cornish AJ, Bentham R, Houlston RS. Genetic landscape of interval and screen detected breast cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:122. [PMID: 38806682 PMCID: PMC11133314 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00618-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Interval breast cancers (IBCs) are cancers diagnosed between screening episodes. Understanding the biological differences between IBCs and screen-detected breast-cancers (SDBCs) has the potential to improve mammographic screening and patient management. We analysed and compared the genomic landscape of 288 IBCs and 473 SDBCs by whole genome sequencing of paired tumour-normal patient samples collected as part of the UK 100,000 Genomes Project. Compared to SDBCs, IBCs were more likely to be lobular, higher grade, and triple negative. A more aggressive clinical phenotype was reflected in IBCs displaying features of genomic instability including a higher mutation rate and number of chromosomal structural abnormalities, defective homologous recombination and TP53 mutations. We did not however, find evidence to indicate that IBCs are associated with a significantly different immune response. While IBCs do not represent a unique molecular class of invasive breast cancer they exhibit a more aggressive phenotype, which is likely to be a consequence of the timing of tumour initiation. This information is relevant both with respect to treatment as well as informing the screening interval for mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlie Mills
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Amit Sud
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Centre of Immuno-Oncology, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Everall
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Daniel Chubb
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Samuel E D Lawrence
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ben Kinnersley
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex J Cornish
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Robert Bentham
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ten Velde DE, Duijm LEM, van der Sangen MJC, Schipper RJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Vreuls W, Strobbe LJA, Voogd AC. Long-term trends in incidence, characteristics and prognosis of screen-detected and interval cancers in women participating in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1561-1570. [PMID: 38467826 PMCID: PMC11059155 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02633-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No studies are available in which changes over time in characteristics and prognosis of patients with interval breast cancers (ICs) and screen-detected breast cancers (SDCs) have been compared. The aim was to study these trends between 1995 and 2018. METHODS All women with invasive SDCs (N = 4290) and ICs (N = 1352), diagnosed in a southern mammography screening region in the Netherlands, were included and followed until date of death or 31 December 2022. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival rate of women with SDCs increased from 91.4% for those diagnosed in 1995-1999 to 95.0% for those diagnosed in 2013-2018 (P < 0.001), and from 74.8 to 91.6% (P < 0.001) in the same periods for those with ICs. A similar trend was observed for the 10-year survival rates. After adjustment for changes in tumour characteristics, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.59) for women with SDCs diagnosed in the period 2013-2018, compared to the women diagnosed in the period 1995-1999. For the women with ICs this HR was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.19-0.40). CONCLUSION The prognosis of women with ICs has improved rapidly since 1995 and is now almost similar to that of women with SDCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucien E M Duijm
- Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Willem Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Luc J A Strobbe
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mars N, Kerminen S, Tamlander M, Pirinen M, Jakkula E, Aaltonen K, Meretoja T, Heinävaara S, Widén E, Ripatti S. Comprehensive Inherited Risk Estimation for Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Women. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1477-1487. [PMID: 38422475 PMCID: PMC11095905 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Family history (FH) and pathogenic variants (PVs) are used for guiding risk surveillance in selected high-risk women but little is known about their impact for breast cancer screening on population level. In addition, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been shown to efficiently stratify breast cancer risk through combining information about common genetic factors into one measure. METHODS In longitudinal real-life data, we evaluate PRS, FH, and PVs for stratified screening. Using FinnGen (N = 117,252), linked to the Mass Screening Registry for breast cancer (1992-2019; nationwide organized biennial screening for age 50-69 years), we assessed the screening performance of a breast cancer PRS and compared its performance with FH of breast cancer and PVs in moderate- (CHEK2)- to high-risk (PALB2) susceptibility genes. RESULTS Effect sizes for FH, PVs, and high PRS (>90th percentile) were comparable in screening-aged women, with similar implications for shifting age at screening onset. A high PRS identified women more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer after a positive screening finding (positive predictive value [PPV], 39.5% [95% CI, 37.6 to 41.5]). Combinations of risk factors increased the PPVs up to 45% to 50%. A high PRS conferred an elevated risk of interval breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78 [95% CI, 2.00 to 3.86] at age 50 years; HR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.67 to 3.70] at age 60 years), and women with a low PRS (<10th percentile) had a low risk for both interval- and screen-detected breast cancers. CONCLUSION Using real-life screening data, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of a breast cancer PRS for risk stratification, alone and combined with FH and PVs. Further research is required to evaluate their impact in a prospective risk-stratified screening program, including cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Mars
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sini Kerminen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Max Tamlander
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matti Pirinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eveliina Jakkula
- Department of Clinical Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsimari Aaltonen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomo Meretoja
- Breast Surgery Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sirpa Heinävaara
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elisabeth Widén
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Samuli Ripatti
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodriguez J, Grassmann F, Xiao Q, Eriksson M, Mao X, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Hall P, Czene K. Investigation of Genetic Alterations Associated With Interval Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:372-379. [PMID: 38270937 PMCID: PMC10811589 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Breast cancers (BCs) diagnosed between 2 screening examinations are called interval cancers (ICs), and they have worse clinicopathological characteristics and poorer prognosis than screen-detected cancers (SDCs). However, the association of rare germline genetic variants with IC have not been studied. Objective To evaluate whether rare germline deleterious protein-truncating variants (PTVs) can be applied to discriminate between IC and SDC while considering mammographic density. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based genetic association study was based on women aged 40 to 76 years who were attending mammographic screening in Sweden. All women with a diagnosis of BC between January 2001 and January 2016 were included, together with age-matched controls. Patients with BC were followed up for survival until 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2021 to December 2022. Exposure Germline PTVs in 34 BC susceptibility genes as analyzed by targeted sequencing. Main Outcomes and Measures Odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare IC with SDC using logistic regression. Hazard ratios were used to investigate BC-specific survival using Cox regression. Results All 4121 patients with BC (IC, n = 1229; SDC, n = 2892) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 55.5 (7.1) years. There were 5631 age-matched controls. The PTVs of the ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 genes were more common in patients with IC compared with SDC (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.05). This association was primarily influenced by BRCA1/2 and PALB2 variants. A family history of BC together with PTVs of any of these genes synergistically increased the probability of receiving a diagnosis of IC rather than SDC (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.97-7.92). Furthermore, 10-year BC-specific survival revealed that if a patient received a diagnosis of an IC, carriers of PTVs in any of these 5 genes had significantly worse survival compared with patients not carrying any of them (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.06-3.92). All of these associations were further pronounced in a subset of patients with IC who had a low mammographic density at prior screening examination. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study may be helpful in future optimizations of screening programs that aim to lower mortality as well as the clinical treatment of patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Rodriguez
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Qingyang Xiao
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xinhe Mao
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grassmann F, Mälarstig A, Dahl L, Bendes A, Dale M, Thomas CE, Gabrielsson M, Hedman ÅK, Eriksson M, Margolin S, Huang TH, Ulfstedt M, Forsberg S, Eriksson P, Johansson M, Hall P, Schwenk JM, Czene K. The impact of circulating protein levels identified by affinity proteomics on short-term, overall breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:620-627. [PMID: 38135714 PMCID: PMC10876928 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02541-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current breast cancer risk prediction scores and algorithms can potentially be further improved by including molecular markers. To this end, we studied the association of circulating plasma proteins using Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) with incident breast cancer risk. SUBJECTS In this study, we included 1577 women participating in the prospective KARMA mammographic screening cohort. RESULTS In a targeted panel of 164 proteins, we found 8 candidates nominally significantly associated with short-term breast cancer risk (P < 0.05). Similarly, in an exploratory panel consisting of 2204 proteins, 115 were found nominally significantly associated (P < 0.05). However, none of the identified protein levels remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing. This lack of statistically significant findings was not due to limited power, but attributable to the small effect sizes observed even for nominally significant proteins. Similarly, adding plasma protein levels to established risk factors did not improve breast cancer risk prediction accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the levels of the studied plasma proteins captured by the PEA method are unlikely to offer additional benefits for risk prediction of short-term overall breast cancer risk but could provide interesting insights into the biological basis of breast cancer in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Institute for Clinical Research and Systems Medicine, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany.
| | - Anders Mälarstig
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Leo Dahl
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Annika Bendes
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Matilda Dale
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Engel Thomas
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Marike Gabrielsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa K Hedman
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tzu-Hsuan Huang
- Cancer Immunology Discovery, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Per Eriksson
- Olink Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mattias Johansson
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jochen M Schwenk
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shieh Y, Roger J, Yau C, Wolf DM, Hirst GL, Swigart LB, Huntsman S, Hu D, Nierenberg JL, Middha P, Heise RS, Shi Y, Kachuri L, Zhu Q, Yao S, Ambrosone CB, Kwan ML, Caan BJ, Witte JS, Kushi LH, 't Veer LV, Esserman LJ, Ziv E. Development and testing of a polygenic risk score for breast cancer aggressiveness. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:42. [PMID: 37188791 PMCID: PMC10185660 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00382-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aggressive breast cancers portend a poor prognosis, but current polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer do not reliably predict aggressive cancers. Aggressiveness can be effectively recapitulated using tumor gene expression profiling. Thus, we sought to develop a PRS for the risk of recurrence score weighted on proliferation (ROR-P), an established prognostic signature. Using 2363 breast cancers with tumor gene expression data and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes, we examined the associations between ROR-P and known breast cancer susceptibility SNPs using linear regression models. We constructed PRSs based on varying p-value thresholds and selected the optimal PRS based on model r2 in 5-fold cross-validation. We then used Cox proportional hazards regression to test the ROR-P PRS's association with breast cancer-specific survival in two independent cohorts totaling 10,196 breast cancers and 785 events. In meta-analysis of these cohorts, higher ROR-P PRS was associated with worse survival, HR per SD = 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.21, p = 4.0 × 10-4). The ROR-P PRS had a similar magnitude of effect on survival as a comparator PRS for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative versus positive cancer risk (PRSER-/ER+). Furthermore, its effect was minimally attenuated when adjusted for PRSER-/ER+, suggesting that the ROR-P PRS provides additional prognostic information beyond ER status. In summary, we used integrated analysis of germline SNP and tumor gene expression data to construct a PRS associated with aggressive tumor biology and worse survival. These findings could potentially enhance risk stratification for breast cancer screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwey Shieh
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jacquelyn Roger
- PhD Program in Biological and Medical Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denise M Wolf
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gillian L Hirst
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lamorna Brown Swigart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott Huntsman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Donglei Hu
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jovia L Nierenberg
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pooja Middha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel S Heise
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yushu Shi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda Kachuri
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Qianqian Zhu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Christine B Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marilyn L Kwan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Bette J Caan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - John S Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Laura van 't Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elad Ziv
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Body Mass Index Is Inversely Associated with Risk of Postmenopausal Interval Breast Cancer: Results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133228. [PMID: 35804998 PMCID: PMC9264843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Interval breast cancer refers to cancer diagnosed after a negative screening mammogram and before the next scheduled screening mammogram. Interval breast cancer has worse prognosis than screening-detected cancer. Body mass index (BMI) influences the accuracy of mammography and overall postmenopausal breast cancer risk, yet how is obesity associated with postmenopausal interval breast cancer incidence is unclear. The current study included cancer-free postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years at enrollment in the Women’s Health Initiative who were diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. Analyses include 324 interval breast cancer cases diagnosed within one year after the participant’s last negative screening mammogram and 1969 screening-detected breast cancer patients. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was measured at baseline. Associations between obesity and incidence of interval cancer were determined by sequential logistic regression analyses. In multivariable-adjusted models, obesity was inversely associated with interval breast cancer risk [OR (95% CI) = 0.65 (0.46, 0.92)]. The inverse association persisted after excluding women diagnosed within 2 years [OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42, 0.87)] or 4 years [OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.37, 0.86)] of enrollment, suggesting consistency of the association regardless of screening practices prior to trial entry. These findings warrant confirmation in studies with body composition measures.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Z, Tabung FK, Jin Q, Curran G, Irvin VL, Shannon J, Velie EM, Manson JE, Simon MS, Vitolins M, Valencia CI, Snetselaar L, Jindal S, Schedin P. Diet-Driven Inflammation and Insulinemia and Risk of Interval Breast Cancer. Nutr Cancer 2022; 74:3179-3193. [PMID: 35471124 PMCID: PMC9439260 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2063350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Interval breast cancers (IBCs) emerge after a non-suspicious mammogram and before the patient's next scheduled screen. Risk factors associated with IBC have not been identified. This study evaluated if the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) or empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH) scores are associated with IBC compared to screen-detected breast cancer. Data were from women 50-79 years-old in the Women's Health Initiative cohort who completed food frequency questionnaires at baseline (1993-98) and were followed through March 31, 2019 for breast cancer detection. Women were identified as having either IBC diagnosed within 1-year after their last negative screening mammogram (N = 317) or screen-detected breast cancer (N = 1,928). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios for risk of IBC compared to screen-detected cancer in dietary index tertiles. No associations were observed between EDIP or EDIH and IBC. Odds ratios comparing the highest to the lowest dietary index tertile were 1.08; 95%CI, 0.78-1.48 for EDIP and 0.92; 95%CI, 0.67-1.27 for EDIH. The null associations persisted when stratified by BMI categories. Findings suggest that diet-driven inflammation or insulinemia may not be substantially associated with IBC risk among postmenopausal women. Future studies are warranted to identify modifiable factors for IBC prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Zhang
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Fred K Tabung
- College of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Qi Jin
- Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Grace Curran
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Veronica L Irvin
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ellen M Velie
- Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.,Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael S Simon
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mara Vitolins
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Celina I Valencia
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Linda Snetselaar
- College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Sonali Jindal
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Pepper Schedin
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Missed Breast Cancers on MRI in High-Risk Patients: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Tomography 2022; 8:329-340. [PMID: 35202192 PMCID: PMC8879993 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8010027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if MRI features and molecular subtype influence the detectability of breast cancers on MRI in high-risk patients. Methods and Materials: Breast cancers in a high-risk population of 104 patients were diagnosed following MRI describing a BI-RADS 4–5 lesion. MRI characteristics at the time of diagnosis were compared with previous MRI, where a BI-RADS 1–2–3 lesion was described. Results: There were 77 false-negative MRIs. A total of 51 cancers were overlooked and 26 were misinterpreted. There was no association found between MRI characteristics, the receptor type and the frequency of missed cancers. The main factors for misinterpreted lesions were multiple breast lesions, prior biopsy/surgery and long-term stability. Lesions were mostly overlooked because of their small size and high background parenchymal enhancement. Among missed lesions, 50% of those with plateau kinetics on initial MRI changed for washout kinetics, and 65% of initially progressively enhancing lesions then showed plateau or washout kinetics. There were more basal-like tumours in BRCA1 carriers (50%) than in non-carriers (13%), p = 0.0001, OR = 6.714, 95% CI = [2.058–21.910]. The proportion of missed cancers was lower in BRCA carriers (59%) versus non-carriers (79%), p < 0.05, OR = 2.621, 95% CI = [1.02–6.74]. Conclusions: MRI characteristics or molecular subtype do not influence breast cancer detectability. Lesions in a post-surgical breast should be assessed with caution. Long-term stability does not rule out malignancy and multimodality evaluation is of added value. Lowering the biopsy threshold for lesions with an interval change in kinetics for a type 2 or 3 curve should be considered. There was a higher rate of interval cancers in BRCA 1 patients attributed to lesions more aggressive in nature.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ugalde-Morales E, Grassmann F, Humphreys K, Li J, Eriksson M, Tobin NP, Lindström LS, Vallon-Christersson J, Borg Å, Hall P, Czene K. Interval breast cancer is associated with interferon immune response. Eur J Cancer 2022; 162:194-205. [PMID: 35026490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aggressive nature of breast cancers detected between planned mammographic screens, so-called interval cancers, remains elusive. Here, we aim to characterise underlying molecular features of interval cancer. METHODS From 672 patients with invasive breast cancer, we analysed gene expression differences between 90 'true' interval cancer cases (i.e. women with low-dense breasts defined as per cent mammographic density <25%) and 310 screen-detected tumours while accounting for PAM50 subtypes and thus overall tumour aggressiveness. We computed an interval cancer gene expression profile (IC-Gx) in a total of 2270 breast tumours (regardless of interval cancer status) and tested for association with expression-based immune subtypes in breast cancer. In addition, we investigated the contribution of inherited and somatic genetic variants in distinct features of interval cancer. RESULTS We identified 8331 genes nominally associated with interval cancer (P-value < 0.05, fold-change > 1.5). Gene set enrichment analysis showed immune-related pathways as key processes altered in interval cancer. Our IC-Gx, based on 47 genes with the strongest associations (false discovery rate < 0.05), was found to be associated mainly with immune subtypes involving interferon response. We isolated an interaction network of interval cancer and interferon genes for which a significant load of somatic and germline variants in class I interferon genes was observed. CONCLUSION We identified novel molecular features of interval breast cancer highlighting interferon pathways as a potential target for prevention or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Ugalde-Morales
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish EScience Research Centre (SeRC), Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden
| | - Jingmei Li
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Human Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicholas P Tobin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda S Lindström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Vallon-Christersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Medicon Village 404-A2 Lund, SE-22381, Sweden; Lund University Cancer Center Lund, SE-22381, Sweden; CREATE Health Strategic Centre for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University Lund, SE-22381, Sweden
| | - Åke Borg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Medicon Village 404-A2 Lund, SE-22381, Sweden; Lund University Cancer Center Lund, SE-22381, Sweden; CREATE Health Strategic Centre for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University Lund, SE-22381, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, SCIBLU Genomics, Lund University Lund, SE-22381, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Najafi M, Majidpoor J, Toolee H, Mortezaee K. The current knowledge concerning solid cancer and therapy. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2021; 35:e22900. [PMID: 34462987 DOI: 10.1002/jbt.22900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Solid cancers comprise a large number of new cases and deaths from cancer each year globally. There are a number of strategies for addressing tumors raised from solid organs including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, combinational therapy, and stem cell and extracellular vesicle (EV) therapy. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are the dominant cures, but are not always effective, in which even in a localized tumor there is a possibility of tumor relapse after surgical resection. Over half of the cancer patients will receive radiotherapy as a part of their therapeutic schedule. Radiotherapy can cause an abscopal response for boosting the activity of the immune system outside the local field of radiation, but it may also cause an unwanted bystander effect, predisposing nonradiated cells into carcinogenesis. In the context of immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibition is known as the standard-of-care, but the major concern is in regard with cold cancers that show low responses to such therapy. Stem-cell therapy can be used to send prodrugs toward the tumor area; this strategy, however, has its own predicaments, such as unwanted attraction toward the other sites including healthy tissues and its instability. A substitute to such therapy and quite a novel strategy is to use EVs, by virtue of their stability and potential to cross biological barriers and long-term storage of contents. Combination therapy is the current focus. Despite advances in the field, there are still unmet concerns in the area of effective cancer therapy, raising challenges and opportunities for future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Najafi
- Medical Technology Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.,Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Jamal Majidpoor
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Heidar Toolee
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Keywan Mortezaee
- Cancer and Immunology Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.,Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Daniaux M, Gruber L, Santner W, Czech T, Knapp R. Interval breast cancer: Analysis of occurrence, subtypes and implications for breast cancer screening in a model region. Eur J Radiol 2021; 143:109905. [PMID: 34403883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Interval breast carcinomas (IBC) constitute a subgroup of malignancies in women participating in a breast cancer screening programme, yet diagnosed outside of a screening appointment. Tyrol is an Austrian screening model region with a dedicated IBC board. We analysed IBC subtype distribution, demographic and biological parameters and implications for screening programmes. METHOD 161 patients with an IBC diagnosed from 2014 to 2017 were retrospectively analysed and grouped into true, occult, minimal-signs, and false negative (due to reading or technical error) IBCs cases by three independent readers. The influence of demographic and disease-related covariates were assessed. RESULTS The median interval from screening to diagnostic diagnosis was 12.8 months (range 1.1 to 23.9 months). Most cases were true (36.02%), occult (31.06%) and false-negative IBCs due to reading errors (29.81%). Interobserver agreement was rated as 'high' between all readers. Higher breast density was associated with true and occult IBCs. The rate of invasive subtypes was highest in true IBCs. Regardless of smaller tumour size in true and occult IBCs, doubling time was lower and ki-67 index higher in true and occult compared to false-negative IBCs. CONCLUSIONS True and occult IBCs present with a more aggressive biological phenotype and are associated with younger age and higher breast density. Additional yearly ultrasound examinations in women at risk may aid in the earlier detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Daniaux
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Leonhard Gruber
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Wolfram Santner
- Department of Radiology, Privatklinik Hirslanden, Rigistrasse 1, Cham, Switzerland
| | - Theresa Czech
- Department of Gynaecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rudolf Knapp
- Department of Radiology, Bezirkskrankenhaus Kufstein, Endach 27, Kufstein, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grassmann F, Yang H, Eriksson M, Azam S, Hall P, Czene K. Mammographic features are associated with cardiometabolic disease risk and mortality. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:3361-3370. [PMID: 34338750 PMCID: PMC8423470 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims In recent years, microcalcifications identified in routine mammograms were found to be associated with cardiometabolic disease in women. Here, we aimed to systematically evaluate the association of microcalcifications and other mammographic features with cardiometabolic disease risk and mortality in a large screening cohort and to understand a potential genetic contribution. Methods and results This study included 57 867 women from a prospective mammographic screening cohort in Sweden (KARMA) and 49 583 sisters. Cardiometabolic disease diagnoses and mortality and medication were extracted by linkage to Swedish population registries with virtually no missing data. In the cardiometabolic phenome-wide association study, we found that a higher number of microcalcifications were associated with increased risk for multiple cardiometabolic diseases, particularly in women with pre-existing cardiometabolic diseases. In contrast, dense breasts were associated with a lower incidence of cardiometabolic diseases. Importantly, we observed similar associations in sisters of KARMA women, indicating a potential genetic overlap between mammographic features and cardiometabolic traits. Finally, we observed that the presence of microcalcifications was associated with increased cardiometabolic mortality in women with pre-existing cardiometabolic diseases (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 1.79 [1.24–2.58], P = 0.002) while we did not find such effects in women without cardiometabolic diseases. Conclusions We found that mammographic features are associated with cardiometabolic risk and mortality. Our results strengthen the notion that a combination of mammographic features and other breast cancer risk factors could be a novel and affordable tool to assess cardiometabolic health in women attending mammographic screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden.,Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Haomin Yang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xuefu North Road 1, University Town, Fuzhou 350122, China
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Shadi Azam
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang C, Hu K, Deng L, He W, Fang F, Tamimi RM, Lu D. Increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:491. [PMID: 33941118 PMCID: PMC8091680 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08132-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer survivors who develop breast cancer as a second malignancy (BCa-2) are common. Yet, little is known about the prognosis of BCa-2 compared to first primary breast cancer (BCa-1). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 883,881 patients with BCa-1 and 36,313 patients with BCa-2 during 1990–2015. Compared with patients with BCa-1, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with BCa-2, using multivariable Cox regression. Results During the follow-up (median 5.5 years), 114,964 and 3829 breast cancer-specific deaths were identified among BCa-1 and BCa-2 patients, respectively. Patients with BCa-2 had more favorable tumor characteristics and received less intensive treatment e.g., surgery and chemo−/radio-therapy, compared to patients with BCa-1. When adjusting for demographic factors, patients with BCa-2 were at similar risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.03) compared to patients with BCa-1. However, when additionally controlling for tumor characteristics and treatment modes, BCa-2 patients were at an increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08–1.15). The risk elevation was particularly greater when the first malignancy was lung, bladder, ovarian or blood malignancy (HRs 1.16–1.85), or when the first malignancy was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28–1.63). Conclusions Overall, patients with BCa-2 have worse breast cancer-specific survival, compared with their BCa-1 counterparts, although the risk elevation is mild. High-risk subgroups based on first malignancy’s characteristics may be considered for active clinical management. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08132-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengshi Wang
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, and Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
| | - Kejia Hu
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Wei He
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fang Fang
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donghao Lu
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. .,West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Majidpoor J, Mortezaee K. The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cold cancers and future perspectives. Clin Immunol 2021; 226:108707. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
17
|
LncRNA HAND2-AS1 suppressed the growth of triple negative breast cancer via reducing secretion of MSCs derived exosomal miR-106a-5p. Aging (Albany NY) 2020; 13:424-436. [PMID: 33290256 PMCID: PMC7835037 DOI: 10.18632/aging.202148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a special type of breast cancer, its tumor cell metastasis rate is much higher than other types, and at the same time has a high rate of postoperative recurrence, which significantly threatens the health of women. Thus, it is urgent to explore a new treatment for TNBC. Results: MiR-106a-5p was up-regulated in TNBC tissues and cells, and was positively correlated with the tumor grade, which indicated poor prognosis in TNBC patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can transport miR-106a-5p into TNBC cells via exosomes. Functional analysis showed exo-miR-106a-5p secreted by MSCs promoted tumor progression in TNBC cells. Furthermore, lncRNA HAND2-AS1 inhibited miR-106a-5p levels, and HAND2-AS1 was decreased in TNBC tissues and cells. Besides, overexpression of HAND2-AS1 reduced the secretion of exo-miR-106a-5p secretion from MSCs, thus suppressed TNBC development. Conclusion: Our study revealed that HAND2-AS1 inhibited the growth of TNBC, which were mediated by the inhibitory effects of MSC-derived exosomal miR-106a-5p.
Collapse
|
18
|
Niraula S, Biswanger N, Hu P, Lambert P, Decker K. Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2018179. [PMID: 32975573 PMCID: PMC7519419 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Breast cancer comprises a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. Many breast cancers, particularly the more lethal ones, may not satisfy the assumptions about biology and natural history of breast cancer necessary for screening mammography to be effective. OBJECTIVES To compare tumor characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of a normal screening mammogram (interval breast cancer [IBC]) with those of screen-detected breast cancers (SBC) and to compare breast cancer-specific mortality of IBC with SBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this registry-based cohort study, we collected data about relevant tumor- and patient-related variables on women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2004 and June 2010 who participated in the population-based screening program in Manitoba, Canada, and those diagnosed with breast cancer outside the screening program in the province. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess tumor and patient characteristics associated with a diagnosis of IBC compared with SBC. Competing risk analysis was performed to examine risk of death by cancer detection method. EXPOSURES Breast cancer diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Differences in tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS A total of 69 025 women aged 50 to 64 years had 212 screening mammograms during the study period. There were 1687 breast cancer diagnoses (705 SBC, 206 IBC, 275 were noncompliant, and 501 were detected outside the screening program), and 225 deaths (170 breast cancer-specific deaths). Interval cancers were more likely than SBC to be of high grade and estrogen receptor negative (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% CI, 3.73-10.75; P < .001; and OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.01-4.13; P < .001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 7 years, breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher for IBC compared with SBC cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.55; 95% CI, 2.01-6.28; P < .001), for a sojorn time of 2 years. Non-breast cancer mortality was similar between IBC and SBC (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.43-4.15). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, interval cancers were highly prevalent in women participating in population screening, represented a worse biology, and had a hazard for breast cancer death more than 3-fold that for SBC. Strategies beyond current mammographic screening practices are needed to reduce incidence, improve detection, and reduce deaths from these potentially lethal breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saroj Niraula
- Section of Medical Oncology and hematology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Natalie Biswanger
- Cancer Screening program, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - PingZhao Hu
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pascal Lambert
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kathleen Decker
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Irvin VL, Zhang Z, Simon MS, Chlebowski RT, Luoh SW, Shadyab AH, Krok-Schoen JL, Tabung FK, Qi L, Stefanick ML, Schedin P, Jindal S. Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e207227. [PMID: 32602908 PMCID: PMC7327543 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Interval breast cancers (IBCs) are cancers that emerge after a mammogram with negative results but before the patient's next scheduled screening. Interval breast cancer has a worse prognosis than cancers detected by screening; however, it is unknown whether the length of the interscreening period is associated with prognostic features and mortality. OBJECTIVE To compare the prognostic features and mortality rate of women with IBCs diagnosed within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years of a mammogram with negative results with the prognostic features and mortality rate of women with breast cancers detected by screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used mammography data, tumor characteristics, and patient demographic data from the Women's Health Initiative study, which recruited participants from 1993 to 1998 and followed up with participants for a median of 19 years. The present study sample for these analyses included women aged 50 to 79 years who participated in the Women's Health Initiative study and includes data collected through March 31, 2018. There were 5455 incidents of breast cancer; only 3019 women compliant with screening were retained in analyses. Statistical analysis was performed from October 25, 2018, to November 24, 2019. Breast cancers detected by screening and IBCs were defined based on mammogram history, date of last mammogram, type of visit, and results of examination. Interval breast cancers were subdivided into those occurring within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years after the last protocol-mandated mammogram with negative results. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome of this study was breast cancer-specific mortality for each case of breast cancer detected by screening and IBCs detected within 1 year or between 1 and 2.5 years from a mammogram with negative results. Secondary outcomes included prognostic and tumor characteristics for each group. Comparisons between groups were made using the t test, the χ2 test, and Fine-Gray multivariable cumulative incidence regression analyses. RESULTS Among the 3019 participants in this analysis, all were women with a mean (SD) age of 63.1 (6.8) years at enrollment and 68.5 (7.1) years at diagnosis. A total of 1050 cases of IBC were identified, with 324 (30.9%) diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results and 726 (69.1%) diagnosed between 1 and 2.5 years after last mammogram with negative results. The remaining 1969 cases were breast cancers detected by screening. Interval breast cancers diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results had significantly more lobular histologic characteristics (13.0% vs. 8.1%), a larger tumor size (1.97 cm vs 1.43 cm), a higher clinical stage (28.4% vs 17.3% regional and 3.7% vs 0.6% distant), and more lymph node involvement (27.1% vs 17.0%) than cancers detected by screening. Unadjusted breast cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios were significantly higher for IBCs diagnosed within 1 year from a mammogram with negative results compared with breast cancers detected by screening (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.65). Higher breast cancer-specific mortality remained statistically significant for IBCs diagnosed within 1 year after adjusting for trial group, molecular subtype, waist to hip ratio, histologic characteristics, and either tumor size (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.08) or lymph node involvement (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01). However, significance was lost when tumor size and lymph node involvement were both included in the model (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.96-1.88). Interval breast cancers diagnosed between 1 and 2.5 years from a mammogram with negative results were not different from breast cancers detected by screening based on prognostic factors or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Women with IBCs diagnosed within 1 year of negative mammogram results overall were associated with worse survival than women with breast cancers detected by screening. These differences in survival may be due to a uniquely aggressive biology among IBC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica L. Irvin
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Zhenzhen Zhang
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Michael S. Simon
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Rowan T. Chlebowski
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Shiuh-Wen Luoh
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Aladdin H. Shadyab
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Fred K. Tabung
- College of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Lihong Qi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis
| | - Marcia L. Stefanick
- Department of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research Center), School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Pepper Schedin
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Sonali Jindal
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shieh Y, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Interval breast cancers - insights into a complex phenotype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:138-139. [PMID: 31965086 PMCID: PMC10365927 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwey Shieh
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elad Ziv
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,General Internal Medicine Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|