1
|
Wei C, Du X, Hu J, Dong Y, Chen Y, Cao B. Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 198:104082. [PMID: 37532103 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to investigate the prognosis and safety of perioperative chemotherapy (PC) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). METHODS We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1st September 2022. RESULTS Eighteen studies were eligible for the analysis, including 4686 patients in total. Our study found that patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing PC had favorable prognosis on OS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87) and DFS (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.84) than those who undergoing AC. Addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to AC provided higher R0 resection rate but did not increase the risk of postoperative complication rate and most of the adverse event rates. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that PC shows better OS and DFS in Asians with resectable gastric cancer compared with AC. PC should be preferred because of its favorable prognosis and similar safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Wei
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Xuelin Du
- Clinical Trial Institution, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Jiexuan Hu
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yin Dong
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Bangwei Cao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin L, Zhang L, Fu L, Song F, Cheng A. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolism multi-parameter prediction of chemotherapy efficacy in locally progressive gastric cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2024; 38:475-482. [PMID: 38536655 PMCID: PMC11108936 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01921-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to use an 18F-FDG PET/CT multiparametric quantitative analysis to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally progressive gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 34 patients with pathologically identified gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Chemotherapy regimens were followed and 18F-FDG PET/CT was conducted. We ascertained multiparamaters of the target lesions pre- and post-treatment and determined the ideal cutoff values for the percentage change in biomarkers. Independent factors were evaluated using binary logistic regression. A response classification system was used to explore the association between metabolic and anatomical responses and the degree of pathological remission. RESULTS Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Lauren bowel type and change in total lesion glycolysis >45.2% were risk predictors for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy; total lesion glycolysis demonstrated the best predictive efficacy. The categorical variable system of the two-module response (metabolic and anatomical response) group had a higher predictive accuracy than that of the single-module response (metabolic or anatomical response) group. CONCLUSIONS Using 18F-FDG PET/CT multiparametric quantitative analysis, Lauren bowel type and change in total lesion glycolysis >45.2% were independent predictors of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Additionally, the dual-module assessment demonstrated high predictive efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luqiang Jin
- Jinzhou Medical University Postgraduate Training Base (Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Linghe Zhang
- Cancer Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liping Fu
- Cancer Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fahuan Song
- Cancer Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Aiping Cheng
- Cancer Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang Z, Xie Y, Zhang W, Du C, Zhong Y, Zhu Y, Jiang L, Dou L, Shao K, Sun Y, Xue Q, Tian Y, Gao S, Zhao D, Zhou A. Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for the treatment of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): an open-label, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:571-579. [PMID: 38457083 PMCID: PMC11016518 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01471-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear whether addition of docetaxel to the combination of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine could provide more clinical benefits than doublet chemotherapies in the perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (LAG/GEJ) cancer in Asia. In this randomized, phase 2 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of perioperative docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in LAG/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS Patients with cT3-4 Nany M0 G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were randomized (1:1) to receive 4 cycles of preoperative DOS or SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 4 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR). RESULTS From Aug, 2015 to Dec, 2019,154 patients were enrolled and 147 patients included in final analysis, with a median age of 60 (26-73) years. DOS resulted in significantly higher MPR (25.4 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.04). R0 resection rate, the 3-year PFS and 3-year OS rates were 78.9 vs. 61.8% (P = 0.02), 52.3 vs. 35% (HR 0.667, 95% CI: 0.432-1.029, Log rank P = 0.07) and 57.5 vs. 49.2% (HR 0.685, 95% CI: 0.429-1.095, Log rank P = 0.11) in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively. Patients who acquired MPR experienced significantly better survival. DOS had similar tolerance to SOX. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative DOS improved MPR significantly and tended to produce longer PFS compared to SOX in LAG/GEJ cancer in Asia, and might be considered as a preferred option for perioperative chemotherapy and worth further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yibin Xie
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chunxia Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuxin Zhong
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuelu Zhu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lizhou Dou
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Kang Shao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qi Xue
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yantao Tian
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shugeng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dongbing Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li N, Li Z, Fu Q, Zhang B, Zhang J, Wan XB, Lu CM, Wang JB, Deng WY, Ma YJ, Bie LY, Wang MY, Li J, Xia QX, Wei C, Luo SX. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab in combination with FLOT chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, phase II study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2071-2084. [PMID: 38320099 PMCID: PMC11020066 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer aroused wide interest. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy for HER2-negative locally advanced G/GEJ cancer. METHODS Eligible patients with clinical stage cT4 and/or cN+M0 G/GEJ cancer were enroled in this phase II study. Patients received neoadjuvant sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) for three cycles plus FLOT (50 mg/m 2 docetaxel, 80 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m 2 calcium levofolinate, 2600 mg/m 2 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks) for four cycles before surgery, followed by four cycles of adjuvant FLOT with same dosages after resection. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were enroled between August 2019 and September 2021, with a median follow-up of 34.8 (95% CI, 32.8-42.9) months. Thirty-two (100%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and 29 underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 93.1%. The pCR (TRG0) was achieved in 5 (17.2%; 95% CI, 5.8-35.8%) patients, and the major pathological response was 55.2%. Twenty-three (79.3%) patients had T downstaging, 21 (72.4%) had N downstaging, and 19 (65.5%) had overall TNM downstaging. Six (20.7%) patients experienced recurrence. Patients achieving pCR showed better event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) than non-pCR. The estimated 3-year EFS rate, 3-year DFS rate, and 3-year OS rate were 71.4% (95% CI, 57.2-89.2%), 78.8% (95% CI, 65.1-95.5%), and 70.9% (95% CI, 54.8-91.6%), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 84.4% (95% CI, 68.3-93.1%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 84.3-99.5%), respectively. Twenty-five (86.2%) received adjuvant therapy. The main grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were lymphopenia (34.4%), neutropenia (28.1%), and leukopenia (15.6%). no patients died from TRAE. The LDH level exhibited a better predictive value to pathological responses than PD-L1 and MSI status. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated an encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus FLOT in HER2-negative locally advanced G/GEJ cancer, which suggested a potential therapeutic option for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Qing-Xin Xia
- Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuang ZY, Sun QH, Cao LC, Ma XY, Wang JX, Liu KX, Li J. Efficacy and safety of perioperative therapy for locally resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1046-1058. [PMID: 38577462 PMCID: PMC10989386 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, with over 1 million new cases per year, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. AIM To determine the optimal perioperative treatment regimen for patients with locally resectable GC. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in treating locally resectable GC. The R0 resection rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and incidence of grade 3 or higher nonsurgical severe adverse events (SAEs) associated with various perioperative regimens were analyzed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment regimens and rank their efficacy. RESULTS Thirty RCTs involving 8346 patients were included in this study. Neoadjuvant XELOX plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant CF were found to significantly improve the R0 resection rate compared with surgery alone, and the former had the highest probability of being the most effective option in this context. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant FLOT was associated with the highest probability of being the best regimen for improving OS. Owing to limited data, no definitive ranking could be determined for DFS. Considering nonsurgical SAEs, FLO has emerged as the safest treatment regimen. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights for clinicians when selecting perioperative treatment regimens for patients with locally resectable GC. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Yu Kuang
- Graduate College, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Qian-Hui Sun
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Lu-Chang Cao
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Xin-Yi Ma
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jia-Xi Wang
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Ke-Xin Liu
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jie Li
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu G, Liu T, Shen J, Guan Q. Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone in HER2(-) locally advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024:00029330-990000000-00980. [PMID: 38420853 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to compare the efficacy between neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens in locally advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer (LAGC). METHODS We included LAGC patients from 47 hospitals in China's National Cancer Information Database (NCID) from January 2019 to December 2022. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy between neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens. The primary study result was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary study results were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 1205 LAGC patients were included. After PSM, the ICIs plus chemotherapy and the chemotherapy cohorts had 184 patients each, while the doublet and triplet chemotherapy cohorts had 246 patients each. The pCR rate (14.13% vs . 7.61%, χ2 = 4.039, P = 0.044), and the 2-year (77.60% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.67, 95% con-fidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.98, P = 0.048) and 3-year (70.55% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-0.93, P = 0.048) DFS rates in the ICIs plus chemotherapy cohort were improved compared to those in the chemotherapy cohort. No significant increase was observed in the OS rates at both 1 year and 2 years. The pCR rates, DFS rates at 1-3 years, and OS rates at 1-2 years did not differ significantly between the doublet and triplet cohorts, respectively. No differences were observed in postoperative complications between any of the group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy improved the pCR rate and 2-3 years DFS rates of LAGC compared to chemotherapy alone, but whether short-term benefit could translate into long-term efficacy is unclear. The triplet regimen was not superior to the doublet regimen in terms of efficacy. The safety after surgery was similar between either ICIs plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy or the triplet and the doublet regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gehan Xu
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| | - Tianjiao Liu
- Department of Medical Data, Beijing Yiyong Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100102, China
| | - Jingyi Shen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| | - Quanlin Guan
- Department of Oncology Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Y, Chen X, Lin Y, Zhang S, Zhou Z, Peng J. Oncological risk of proximal gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:255. [PMID: 38395845 PMCID: PMC10885455 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11993-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assesses the metastasis rate of the key distal lymph nodes (KDLN) that are not routinely dissected in proximal gastrectomy, aiming to explore the oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS We analyzed a cohort of 150 patients with proximal locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3/4 before chemotherapy) from two high-volume cancer centers in China who received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. Metastasis rate of the KDLN (No.5/6/12a) and the risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS Key distal lymph node metastasis was detected in 10% (15/150) of patients, with a metastasis rate of 6% (9/150) in No. 5 lymph nodes, 6.7% (10/150) in No. 6 lymph nodes, and 2.7% (2/75) in No. 12a lymph nodes. The therapeutic value index of KDLN as one entity is 5.8. Tumor length showed no correlation with KDLN metastasis, while tumor regression grade (TRG) emerged as an independent risk factor (OR: 1.47; p-value: 0.04). Of those with TRG3 (no response to NAC), 80% (12/15) was found with KDLN metastasis. CONCLUSION For cT3/4 proximal locally advanced gastric cancer patients, the risk of KDLN metastasis remains notably high even after NAC. Therefore, proximal gastrectomy is not recommended; instead, total gastrectomy with thorough distal lymphadenectomy is the preferred surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghe Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510655, Guangzhou, Chinaf, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojiang Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Lin
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shenyan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510655, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiwei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Junsheng Peng
- Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, 510655, Guangzhou, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510655, Guangzhou, Chinaf, China.
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 510655, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhong W, Lin J, Wu C, Wang J, Chen J, Zheng H, Ye K. Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II, single-arm study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7006. [PMID: 38400680 PMCID: PMC10891470 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. METHODS In this single-arm, phase II clinical trial, patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled to receive three cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and oxaliplatin plus S-1 every 3 weeks, followed by surgical resection and adjuvant therapy with the same regimen. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0) rate and secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, total pCR (tpCR, ypT0N0) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, downstaging, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Between September, 2020 and January, 2022, a total of 29 patients were enrolled in the present study, all of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery. Three (10.3%) (95% CI: 2.2-27.4) patients achieved pCR as well as tpCR, 20 (69.0%) patients had MPR and 28 (96.6%) patients achieved R0 resection. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 13 (44.8%) patients, whereas no grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION The neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed a modest pCR rate, and favorable MPR rate and safety profile in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen‐Jin Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Jian‐An Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Chu‐Ying Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Jiantian Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Jun‐Xing Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Huida Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| | - Kai Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanZhou CityFujianChina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yuan Z, Cui H, Xu Q, Gao J, Liang W, Cao B, Lin X, Song L, Huang J, Zhao R, Li H, Yu Z, Du J, Wang S, Chen L, Cui J, Zhao Y, Wei B. Total versus proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1000-1007. [PMID: 38085808 PMCID: PMC10871602 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to analyze and compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG) in patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (GC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHOD A multicenter retrospective cohort study and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed. The authors examined 367 patients with proximal GC who received NACT followed by PG ( n =164) or TG ( n =203) at two Chinese medical institutions between December 2009 and December 2022. Clinical and pathological parameters, postoperative complications, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. The dissection status and metastasis rate of each lymph node station were assessed. RESULTS After PSM, 80 patients were enrolled in both TG and PG group, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups (all P >0.05). The TG group had a higher total number of lymph nodes retrieved ( P <0.001) and longer operative time ( P =0.007) compared to the PG group. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher postoperative complications was similar between the TG group (21.3%, 17/80) and the PG group (17.5%, 14/80) ( P =0.689). The 5-year OS rates were 68.4 for the PG group and 66.0% for the TG group ( P =0.881), while the 5-year RFS rates were 64.8 and 61.9%, respectively ( P =0.571), with no statistically significant differences. Metastasis rates at lymph node stations #4d, #5, #6, and #12a were notably low in the TG group, with values of 2.74, 0.67, 1.33, and 1.74%, respectively. CONCLUSION For proximal GC patients following NACT, PG maintains comparable curative potential and oncological efficacy to TG, making it a safe option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Yuan
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Hao Cui
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Qixuan Xu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Jingwang Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Wenquan Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Bo Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Xia Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing University
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liqiang Song
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Jun Huang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Ruiyang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Hanghang Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Zhiyuan Yu
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Jiajun Du
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Shuyuan Wang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Jianxin Cui
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| | - Yongliang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bo Wei
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yuan SQ, Nie RC, Jin Y, Liang CC, Li YF, Jian R, Sun XW, Chen YB, Guan WL, Wang ZX, Qiu HB, Wang W, Chen S, Zhang DS, Ling YH, Xi SY, Cai MY, Huang CY, Yang QX, Liu ZM, Guan YX, Chen YM, Li JB, Tang XW, Peng JS, Zhou ZW, Xu RH, Wang F. Perioperative toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:552-559. [PMID: 38167937 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02721-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, and the addition of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is under investigation. In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 study (NEOSUMMIT-01), patients with resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer clinically staged as cT3-4aN + M0 were randomized (1:1) to receive either three preoperative and five postoperative 3-week cycles of SOX/XELOX (chemotherapy group, n = 54) or PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus SOX/XELOX, followed by toripalimab monotherapy for up to 6 months (toripalimab plus chemotherapy group, n = 54). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response or near-complete response rate (tumor regression grade (TRG) 0/1). The results showed that patients in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group achieved a higher proportion of TRG 0/1 than those in the chemotherapy group (44.4% (24 of 54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 30.9%-58.6%) versus 20.4% (11 of 54, 95% CI: 10.6%-33.5%)), and the risk difference of TRG 0/1 between toripalimab plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group was 22.7% (95% CI: 5.8%-39.6%; P = 0.009), meeting a prespecified endpoint. In addition, a higher pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group (22.2% (12 of 54, 95% CI: 12.0%-35.6%) versus 7.4% (4 of 54, 95% CI: 2.1%-17.9%); P = 0.030), and surgical morbidity (11.8% in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group versus 13.5% in the chemotherapy group) and mortality (1.9% versus 0%), and treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events (35.2% versus 29.6%) were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, the addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving TRG 0/1 compared to chemotherapy alone and showed a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04250948 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Qiang Yuan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Run-Cong Nie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ying Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Cheng-Cai Liang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Fang Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Rui Jian
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Wei Sun
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ying-Bo Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Long Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zi-Xian Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hai-Bo Qiu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Shi Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dong-Sheng Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Hong Ling
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Shao-Yan Xi
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Mu-Yan Cai
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Chun-Yu Huang
- Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Qiu-Xia Yang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Min Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Xiang Guan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yong-Ming Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiong-Wen Tang
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences, Shanghai, P. R. China
- TopAlliance Biosciences, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jun-Sheng Peng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tian Y, Yang P, Guo H, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Ding P, Zheng T, Deng H, Ma W, Li Y, Fan L, Zhang Z, Wang D, Zhao X, Tan B, Liu Y, Zhao Q. Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin plus capecitabine versus oxaliplatin plus capecitabine for patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: long-term results of a phase III randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4000-4008. [PMID: 37678277 PMCID: PMC10720837 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOX regimen) is rarely used in Eastern countries and its efficacy and safety in advanced gastric cancer have not been reported. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, the authors aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the DOX and oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) regimens, in comparison to surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three hundred patients younger than 60 years with potentially resectable advanced gastric cancer (cT3-4, Nany, M0) were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial between November 2014 and June 2018. The primary endpoint of the study was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS In total, 280 patients (93 in the DOX group, 92 in the XELOX group, and 95 in the surgery group) were included in the per-protocol analysis. The DOX group demonstrated a significantly higher pCR rate compared to the XELOX group (16.1 vs. 4.3%, P =0.008). For patients with intestinal type, the DOX group exhibited significantly higher rates of both pCR and major pathological response compared to the XELOX group ( P =0.007, P <0.001). The 3-year OS rates of the DOX group, the XELOX group and the surgery group were 56.9, 44.6, and 34.7%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 45.2, 40.2, and 28.4%, respectively. The neoadjuvant DOX regimen demonstrated a significant improvement in the 3-year OS of patients compared to the neoadjuvant XELOX regimen ( P =0.037). CONCLUSION The neoadjuvant DOX regimen has shown the potential to increase the pCR rate and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer who are under 60 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Tian
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Peigang Yang
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Honghai Guo
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ze Zhang
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pingan Ding
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Zheng
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huiyan Deng
- Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University
| | | | - Yong Li
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liqiao Fan
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhidong Zhang
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dong Wang
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Zhao
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bibo Tan
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Liu
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qun Zhao
- The Third Department of Surgery
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Avgustinovich AV, Bakina OV, Afanas’ev SG, Spirina LV, Volkov AM. Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Gastric Cancer Patients with a PD-L1 Positive Status: A Case Report. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:7642-7649. [PMID: 37754265 PMCID: PMC10529065 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45090481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The landscape of gastric cancer treatment has changed owing to the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Autophagy, involved in regulating the immune system, is a potential trigger of immunity in tumors. This study aims to find molecular-based evidence for the effectiveness of FLOT chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three patients with advanced gastric cancer received FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy and surgery. IHC was used to determine the PD-L1 status. Real-time PCR was used to analyze expression patterns of transcriptional growth factors, AKT/mTOR signaling components, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 and LC3B. The LC3B content was measured via Western blotting analysis. RESULTS The combination of FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy was found to be efficient in patients with a PD-L1-positive status. Gastric tumors with a PD-L1-positive status exhibited autophagy activation and decreased PD-1 expression. CONCLUSIONS FLOT chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed high efficacy in gastric cancer patients with a positive PD-L1 status. Autophagy was involved in activating the tumor immunity. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanism of effective anticancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra V. Avgustinovich
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk 634050, Russia; (A.V.A.); (S.G.A.); (A.M.V.)
| | - Olga V. Bakina
- Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2/4 pr. Akademicheskii, Tomsk 634055, Russia;
- Medico-Biological Faculty, Division of Biochemistry and Molcecular Biology with Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics Course, Siberian State Medical University, 2, Moskovsky trakt, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - Sergey G. Afanas’ev
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk 634050, Russia; (A.V.A.); (S.G.A.); (A.M.V.)
| | - Liudmila V. Spirina
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk 634050, Russia; (A.V.A.); (S.G.A.); (A.M.V.)
- Medico-Biological Faculty, Division of Biochemistry and Molcecular Biology with Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics Course, Siberian State Medical University, 2, Moskovsky trakt, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - Alexander M. Volkov
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny Street, Tomsk 634050, Russia; (A.V.A.); (S.G.A.); (A.M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiong H, Li Y. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy versus apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2023; 13:3559-3570. [PMID: 37693166 PMCID: PMC10492097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Programed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, apatinib, and chemotherapy show synergistic antitumor effect in gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate this combination as a neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). In this retrospective study, data from 179 LAGC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy with a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC group, n=56), apatinib and chemotherapy (AC group, n=50), or chemotherapy alone (C group, n=73) were analyzed. The PAC group displayed a numerically higher radiologic objective response rate than the AC group (73.2% vs. 60.0%, P=0.149) and significantly higher than the C group (73.2% vs. 35.6%, P<0.001). Tumor resection rates between the PAC and AC groups were not significantly different (100.0% vs. 94.0%, P=0.102) but were higher in the PAC group compared to the C group (100.0% vs. 89.0%, P=0.010). Pathological evaluations revealed comparable R0 resection rates across all groups (P=0.873) and a non-significantly higher pathological complete response rate in the PAC group compared to the AC group (26.8% vs. 17.0%, P=0.236), while significantly higher than the C group (26.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.005). Moreover, the PAC group exhibited a longer progression-free survival compared to the AC (P=0.036) and C (P<0.001) groups, an extended disease-free survival compared to the C group (P=0.002), and improved overall survival compared to the AC (P=0.028) and C (P=0.002) groups. Adverse events were generally comparable, with the highest incidence of peripheral neuropathy observed in the PAC group (26.8%, P=0.020). PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy may represent an effective neoadjuvant regimen for LAGC management, necessitating further validation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mirzaei S, Gholami MH, Aghdaei HA, Hashemi M, Parivar K, Karamian A, Zarrabi A, Ashrafizadeh M, Lu J. Exosome-mediated miR-200a delivery into TGF-β-treated AGS cells abolished epithelial-mesenchymal transition with normalization of ZEB1, vimentin and Snail1 expression. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 231:116115. [PMID: 37178752 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles that can be derived from human cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The size of exosomes is at nano-scale range and owing to their biocompatibility and other characteristics, they have been promising candidates for delivery of bioactive compounds and genetic materials in disease therapy, especially cancer therapy. Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of death among patients and this malignant disease affects gastrointestinal tract that its invasiveness and abnormal migration mediate poor prognosis of patients. Metastasis is an increasing challenge in GC and microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential regulators of metastasis and related molecular pathways, especially epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In the present study, our aim was to explore role of exosomes in miRNA-200a delivery for suppressing EMT-mediated GC metastasis. Exosomes were isolated from MSCs via size exclusion chromatography. The synthetic miRNA-200a mimics were transfected into exosomes via electroporation. AGS cell line exposed to TGF-β for EMT induction and then, these cells cultured with miRNA-200a-loaded exosomes. The transwell assays performed to evaluate GC migration and expression levels of ZEB1, Snail1 and vimentin measured. Exosomes demonstrated loading efficiency of 5.92 ± 4.6%. The TGF-β treatment transformed AGS cells into fibroblast-like cells expressing two stemness markers, CD44 (45.28%) and CD133 (50.79%) and stimulated EMT. Exosomes induced a 14.89-fold increase in miRNA-200a expression in AGS cells. Mechanistically, miRNA-200a enhances E-cadherin levels (P < 0.01), while it decreases expression levels of β-catenin (P < 0.05), vimentin (P < 0.01), ZEB1 (P < 0.0001) and Snail1 (P < 0.01). Leading to EMT inhibition in GC cells. This pre-clinical experiment introduces a new strategy for miRNA-200a delivery that is of importance for preventing migration and invasion of GC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Mirzaei
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorder Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Hashemi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran; Farhikhtegan Medical Convergence Science Research Center, Farhikhtegan Hospital Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kazem Parivar
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Amin Karamian
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Zarrabi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istinye University, 34485, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Milad Ashrafizadeh
- Department of General Surgery and Institute of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive System Tumors, Carson International Cancer Center, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China; Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Jianlin Lu
- Department of Geriatrics, The Fifth People's Hospital of Wujiang District, Suzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang X, Zhang C, Hou H, Zhang Y, Jiang P, Zhou H, Wang L, Zhou N, Zhang X. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in locally advanced stage II-III gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study. Transl Oncol 2023; 31:101657. [PMID: 36934638 PMCID: PMC10034143 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PD-1 blockade has been shown to have promising efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in advanced and metastatic gastric cancer; however, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade-based immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain uncertain. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients with LAGC who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by D2 radical resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2019 to 2021. The primary aim was to investigate the difference in pathological response rates between neoadjuvant PD-1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Multivariable models for pathological complete response (pCR) were constructed to investigate the factors that facilitate pCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION QYFYWZLL27406. RESULTS A total of 77 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 34 (44.2%) received neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. A higher pCR rate was observed in the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group (8 of 34, 23.5% vs. 2 of 43, 4.7%, P=0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of pCR revealed neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy regimen promoted pCR (OR 12.95, P=0.016). Regarding safety, 76.5% (26 of 34) of patients in the PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy group and 76.7% (33 of 43) of patients in the chemotherapy group experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and grade 3 or worse adverse events were 29.4% (10 of 34) and 34.9% (15 of 43), respectively. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced a higher pCR rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the combined therapy was tolerable in LAGC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuchen Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Chuantao Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Helei Hou
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Yuming Zhang
- Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Peng Jiang
- Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Hai Zhou
- Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Lele Wang
- Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Na Zhou
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Xiaochun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zu M, Hao X, Ning J, Zhou X, Gong Y, Lang Y, Xu W, Zhang J, Ding S. Patient-derived organoid culture of gastric cancer for disease modeling and drug sensitivity testing. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 163:114751. [PMID: 37105073 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer treatment is complicated by the molecular heterogeneity of human tumor cells, which limits the efficacy of standard therapy and necessitates the need for personalized treatment development. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are promising preclinical cancer models, exhibiting high clinical efficacy in predicting drug sensitivity, thus providing a new means for personalized precision medicine. METHODS PDOs were established from surgically resected gastric cancer tumor tissues. Molecular characterization of the tumor tissues and PDOs was performed using whole-exome sequencing analysis. Drug sensitivity tests were performed by treating the PDO cultures with 21 standard-of-care drugs corresponding to patient treatment. We evaluated whether the PDO drug phenotype reflects the corresponding patient's treatment response by comparing the drug sensitivity test results with clinical data. RESULTS Twelve PDOs that satisfied the drug sensitivity test criteria were successfully constructed. PDOs closely recapitulated the pathophysiology and genetic changes in the corresponding tumors, and exhibited different sensitivities to the tested drugs. In one clinical case study, the PDO accurately predicted the patient's sensitivity to capecitabine and oxaliplatin, and in a second case study the PDO successfully predicted the patient's insensitivity to S-1 chemotherapy. In summary, six of the eight cases exhibited consistency between PDO drug susceptibility test results and the clinical response of the matched patient. CONCLUSIONS PDO drug sensitivity tests can predict the clinical response of patients with gastric cancer to drugs, and PDOs can therefore be used as a preclinical platform to guide the development of personalized cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xinyu Hao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yueqing Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yanfei Lang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Weichao Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hebei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China.
| | - Shigang Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Que SJ, Zhong Q, Chen QY, Truty MJ, Yan S, Ma YB, Ding FH, Zheng CH, Li P, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Huang CM. A Novel ypTLM Staging System Based on LODDS for Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Multicenter and Large-Sample Retrospective Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:1762-1771. [PMID: 37069317 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06994-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The accuracy of the eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system on the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is controversial. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel staging system using the log odds of positive lymph nodes scheme (LODDS). METHODS A retrospective analysis of 606 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy was conducted as the development cohort. (Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital (n = 183), Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital (n = 169), Mayo Clinic (n = 236), Lanzhou University First Hospital (n = 18)). The validation cohort came from the SEER database (n = 1701). A novel ypTLoddsS (ypTLM) staging system was established using the 3-year overall survival. The predictive performance of two systems was compared. RESULTS Two-step multivariate Cox regression analysis in both cohorts showed that ypTLM was an independent predictor of overall survival of GC patients after neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.30-1.88, p < 0.001). In the development cohort, ypTLM had better discrimination ability than ypTNM (C-index: 0.663 vs 0.633, p < 0.001), better prediction homogeneity (LR: 97.7 vs. 70.9), and better prediction accuracy (BIC: 3067.01 vs 3093.82; NRI: 0.36). In the validation cohort, ypTLM had a better prognostic predictive ability (C-index: 0.614 vs 0.588, p < 0.001; LR: 11,909.05 vs. 11,975.75; BIC: 13,263.71 vs 13,328.24; NRI: 0.22). The time-dependent ROC curve shows that the predictive performance of ypTLM is better than ypTNM, and the analysis of the decision curve shows that ypTLM achieved better net benefits. CONCLUSION A LODDS-based ypTLM staging system based on multicenter data was established and validated. The predictive performance was superior to the eighth AJCC ypTNM staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Jin Que
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mark J Truty
- Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Su Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Yu-Bin Ma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Fang-Hui Ding
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Long-Long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ru-Hong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ju-Li Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hua-Long Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhao K, Na Y, Xu HM. Advances in translational therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:2405-2411. [PMID: 37123309 PMCID: PMC10130985 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i11.2405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Translational therapy refers to a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer who are initially unable to undergo R0 resection. This treatment can achieve partial or complete remission of the unresectable tumors to meet the criteria for R0 resection, thus enabling the patients to prolong their survival time and improve their quality of life. In gastric cancer, translational therapy has been tried and improved. At present, there are a large number of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer in China, and the selection of suitable patients for translational therapy to prolong objective survival and improve survival quality is one of the hot spots in the field of gastric cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, Shandong Province, China
| | - Ying Na
- Department of General Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hui-Min Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yuan Z, Cui H, Wang S, Liang W, Cao B, Song L, Liu G, Huang J, Chen L, Wei B. Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1103320. [PMID: 36776290 PMCID: PMC9909552 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1103320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising prospects in locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) immunotherapy, but their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of integrating programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of GC/GEJC treatment. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and main oncology conference databases were systematically searched up to 19 November 2022, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus NACT were included. The main outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results A total of 753 patients from 20 prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled pCR and MPR rates from studies reporting were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1%-25.5%] and 44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of total TRAEs was 89.1% (95% CI, 82.7%-94.3%), and the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 TRAEs was 34.4% (95% CI, 17.8%-66.5%). The pooled R0 resection rate was reported to be 98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%). Subgroup analysis has not found significant differences in efficacy and safety among different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, the efficacy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥1) was comparable with that in the entire study population [pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05); MPR, 48.6% vs. 43.7% (p > 0.05)]. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with NACT for locally advanced GC/GEJC were well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages. The integration of ICIs into NACT has shown the potential for application in any PD-L1 expression population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Yuan
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Cui
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuyuan Wang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wenquan Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liqiang Song
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guibin Liu
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Huang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Wei
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhai Y, Zheng Z, Deng W, Yin J, Bai Z, Liu X, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Interval time between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in advanced gastric cancer doesn't affect outcome: A meta analysis. Front Surg 2023; 9:1047456. [PMID: 36726960 PMCID: PMC9885804 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1047456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is not yet firmly confirmed, but the exciting results demonstrated in several clinical studies have led neoadjuvant chemotherapy as the important treatment methods in guidelines. The 4-6 weeks interval time is currently the most commonly used in clinical treatment, but there are insufficient studies to support this time and the optimal interval has not yet been identified. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the short-term life quality and long-term prognostic impact of the interval time between the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane Liabrary for studies published or reported in English from January 2006 to May 2022. We summarised relevant studies for the time to surgery (TTS), included as retrospective studies and prospective studies. The primary study outcome was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), and the secondary outcomes included R0 resection rate, incidence of serious postoperative complications, 3-year progression free survival time (PFS) rate and overall survival time (OS) rate. TTS were classified in three groups: 4-6 weeks, <4 weeks and >6 weeks. The ratio ratios (ORs) were calculated and forest plots and funnel plots were made to analysis by using fixed-effect and random-effect models in Review Manager 5.2. Results A total of five studies included 1,171 patients: 411 patients in shorter TTS group (<4 weeks), 507 patients in medium TTS group (4-6 weeks) and 253 patients in longer TTS groups (>6 weeks). And The results of our meta-analysis indicate that there are no significant difference between the three groups. The pCR, R0 resection rate, incidence of serious postoperative complications, 3-year PFS and OS were similar between three groups. Conclusions Although there many studies exploring the suitable TTS in advanced gastric cancer, but we have not find the evidence to prove the TTS is the risk factor influencing the outcome. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022369009.
Collapse
|
21
|
Knockdown of Circ_0003506 Impedes Radioresistance, Cell Growth, Migration and Invasion in Gastric Cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:128-137. [PMID: 35590046 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioresistance is a major obstacle for clinical treatment of gastric cancer (GC). has_circ_0003506 (circ_0003506) was reported as an oncogenic factor in GC, but its effect on radioresistant GC is unclear. AIMS This study aimed to explore the role of circ_0003506 in radioresistance and regulatory mechanism. METHODS The expression detection was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cell survival was analyzed by colony formation assay. Cell proliferation was measured by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and colony formation assay. Cell migration and invasion were examined using transwell assay. Cell apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry. The target binding was confirmed via dual-luciferase reporter assay. The protein level was determined through western blot. Animal assay was performed for the functional exploration of circ_0003506 on radiosensitivity in vivo. RESULTS Circ_0003506 was upregulated in radioresistant GC cells. Downregulation of circ_0003506 inhibited radioresistance to repress proliferation, migration and invasion but increase apoptosis in radioresistant GC cells. Circ_0003506 was a sponge of miR-1256. The effects of si-circ_0003506 on radioresistant GC cells were reverted by miR-1256 inhibitor. MiR-1256 suppressed tumor progression in radioresistant GC cells by downregulating bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor. Circ_0003506 regulated the level of bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor by targeting miR-1256. Downregulating circ_0003506 increased radiosensitivity of GC in vivo via regulating miR-1256 and bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor. CONCLUSION Knockdown of circ_0003506 suppressed radioresistance in GC through the regulation of miR-1256/bone morphogenetic protein type 2 receptor axis. Circ_0003506 might be a therapeutic target in radiotherapy of GC.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tong X, Zhi P, Lin S. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Asian Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2023; 23:182-193. [PMID: 36750998 PMCID: PMC9911622 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Presently, surgery is the only treatment approach for gastric cancer and improving the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer is one of the key factors in promoting gastric cancer survival benefit. The MAGIC study was the first to demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in European countries. In recent years, several clinical trials have provided evidence for the use of NAC in Asian patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, clinical practice guidelines vary between Asian and non-Asian populations. Optimal NAC regimens, proper target populations, and predictors of NAC outcomes in Asian patients are still under investigation. Herein, we summarized the current progress in the administration of NAC in Asian patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xie Tong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - Shen Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang MQ, Chen YR, Xu HW, Zhan JR, Suo DQ, Wang JJ, Ma YZ, Guan XY, Li Y, Zhu SL. HKDC1 upregulation promotes glycolysis and disease progression, and confers chemoresistance onto gastric cancer. Cancer Sci 2022; 114:1365-1377. [PMID: 36519789 PMCID: PMC10067396 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that hexokinase is involved in cell proliferation and migration. However, the function of the hexokinase domain containing protein-1 (HKDC1) in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. Immunohistochemistry analysis and big data mining were used to evaluate the correlation between HKDC1 expression and clinical features in GC. In addition, the biological function and molecular mechanism of HKDC1 in GC were studied by in vitro and in vivo assays. Our study indicated that HKDC1 expression was upregulated in GC tissues compared with adjacent nontumor tissues. High expression of HKDC1 was associated with worse prognosis. Functional experiments demonstrated that HKDC1 upregulation promoted glycolysis, cell proliferation, and tumorigenesis. In addition, HKDC1 could enhance GC invasion and metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Abrogation of HKDC1 could effectively attenuate its oncogenic and metastatic function. Moreover, HKDC1 promoted GC proliferation and migration in vivo. HKDC1 overexpression conferred chemoresistance to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) onto GC cells. Furthermore, nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) inhibitor PS-341 could attenuate tumorigenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance ability induced by HKDC1 overexpression in GC cells. Our results highlight a critical role of HKDC1 in promoting glycolysis, tumorigenesis, and EMT of GC cells via activating the NF-κB pathway. In addition, HKDC1-mediated drug resistance was associated with DNA damage repair, which further activated NF-κB signaling. HKDC1 upregulation may be used as a potential indicator for choosing an effective chemotherapy regimen for GC patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Qian Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Ru Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui-Wen Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Rong Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Da-Qin Suo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Jin Wang
- Department of radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan-Zhen Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Yuan Guan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Departments of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sen-Lin Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Su J, Guo W, Chen Z, Wang L, Liu H, Zhao L, Lin T, Li F, Mao X, Huang H, Yu J, Li G, Hu Y. Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A retrospective cohort study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1078196. [PMID: 36569865 PMCID: PMC9779926 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1078196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the safety and the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with AGC after neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAI) remain unknown. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the patients with AGC who underwent laparoscopic surgery after neoadjuvant therapy between 1 January 2019 and 31 October 2021. We further compared the differences in postoperative complications, overall response rate, adverse events, surgical parameters, and postoperative recovery between two cohorts: the NAI group (NAI plus chemotherapy) and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group. Multivariable regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors for the overall response rate. Results Overall, 80 patients were enrolled, of whom 30 cases were included in the NAI cohort and 50 were included in the NAC cohort. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 30.0% in both groups (p = 1.000). The overall response rate was 70.0% in the NAI cohort and 40% in the NAC cohort (p = 0.012). The adverse effects were found in 16 cases (53.3%) of the NAI cohort and 23 cases (46.0%) of the NAC cohort (p = 0.645). There was no statistical difference in intraoperative bleeding (50 ml vs. 50 ml, p = 0.983), operation time (320.9 min vs. 303.5 min, p = 0.382), dissected lymph node count (43.5 vs. 40.0, p = 0.364), first postoperative anal aerofluxus (3 days vs. 3 days, p = 0.091), first liquid diet (4 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.213), and postoperative length of stay in the hospital (8 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.508) between the two groups. NAI was estimated to be the independent protective factor [odds ratio (OR) 4.931, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.385-17.559), p = 0.014] for odds to overall response rate, whereas vessel invasion was found to be the significant risk factor [OR 0.113, 95% CI (0.027-0.475), p = 0.003]. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery after NAI combined with chemotherapy is a safe therapeutic choice for AGC and may bring better short-term outcomes due to a higher overall response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Su
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,Department of General Surgery, Zhuzhou Hospital affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China
| | - Weihong Guo
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhian Chen
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lingzhi Wang
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liying Zhao
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tian Lin
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fengping Li
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyuan Mao
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huilin Huang
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiang Yu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guoxin Li
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanfeng Hu
- Department of General Surgery & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yanfeng Hu,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang C, Wu B, Yang H, Yao Z, Zhang N, Tan F, Liu M, Xu K, Chen L, Xing J, Cui M, Su X. The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1223. [PMID: 36443694 PMCID: PMC9703660 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10230-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC. METHODS A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenghai Zhang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Binghong Wu
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Hong Yang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Zhendan Yao
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Nan Zhang
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Fei Tan
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Maoxing Liu
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Kai Xu
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Lei Chen
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Jiadi Xing
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Ming Cui
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Xiangqian Su
- grid.412474.00000 0001 0027 0586Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang T, Li C, Li X, Zhai J, Wang S, Shen L. The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:239. [DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00878-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LAGC) has been recommended in several guidelines. However, there is no global consensus about the optimum of NAC regimens. We aimed to determine the optimal NAC regimen for LAGC.
Methods
A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The literature search was conducted from inception to June 2022. The odds ratio (OR) value and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for assessment of R0 resection rate and pathological complete response rate (pCR) as primary outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) value and 95% CI were interpreted for the assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as second outcomes. The risk ratio (RR) value and 95% CI were used for safety assessment.
Results
Twelve randomized controlled trials were identified with 3846 eligible participants. The network plots for R0 resectability, OS, and DFS constituted closed loops. The regimens of TPF (taxane and platinum plus fluoropyrimidine), ECF (epirubicin and cisplatin plus fluorouracil), and PF (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) showed a meaningful improvement of R0 resectability, as well as OS and/or DFS, compared with surgery (including surgery-alone and surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy). Importantly, among these regimens, TPF regimen showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (versus ECF regimen), OS (versus ECF regimen), DFS (versus PF and ECF regimens), and pCR (versus PF regimen).
Conclusions
The taxane-based triplet regimen of TPF is likely the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for LAGC patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tang X, Liang Y, Sun G, He Q, Hou Z, Jiang X, Gao P, Qu H. Upregulation of CRABP2 by TET1-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation attenuates mitochondrial apoptosis and promotes oxaliplatin resistance in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:848. [PMID: 36195596 PMCID: PMC9532395 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05299-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Oxaliplatin is the main chemotherapy drug for gastric cancer (GC), but quite a few patients are resistant to oxaliplatin, which contributes to the poor prognosis of GC patients. There is therefore an urgent need to identify potential targets for reversing chemotherapy resistance in GC patients. In this study, we analyzed the tumor samples of GC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin through quantitative proteomics and identified the potential chemoresistance-related protein cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (CRABP2). CRABP2 was significantly upregulated in the tumor tissues of chemoresistant GC patients and was closely related to prognosis. The results of cell function experiments showed that CRABP2 can promote the oxaliplatin resistance of GC cells in vitro. Coimmunoprecipitation and GST pulldown assays showed that CRAPB2 expedited the binding of BAX and PARKIN in GC cells and facilitated the ubiquitination-mediated degradation of BAX. Furthermore, both the in vitro assay and cell-derived xenograft (CDX) in vivo model verified that CRABP2 promoted oxaliplatin resistance by inhibiting BAX-dependent cell apoptosis. Further experiments proved that the abnormally high expression of CRABP2 in oxaliplatin-resistant GC cells was affected by TET1-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model suggested that interference with CRABP2 reversed oxaliplatin resistance in GC in vivo. In conclusion, the results of our study show that CRABP2 was a key molecule in oxaliplatin resistance regulation and could be a new target for reversing the chemoresistance of GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Tang
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Yahang Liang
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Guorui Sun
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Qingsi He
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Zhenyu Hou
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Xingzhi Jiang
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Peng Gao
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of Pathology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| | - Hui Qu
- grid.452402.50000 0004 1808 3430Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a multicentered, prospective, cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04302-9. [PMID: 36042044 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04302-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and apatinib have been utilized in metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib (SOXPA) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. METHODS This two-centered, prospective, cohort study analyzed 30 resectable LAGC patients receiving SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS Two (6.7%), 18 (60.0%), and 10 (33.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD), separately. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 66.7% and 100.0%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 93.3%. Beyond that, 6 (20.0%), 18 (60.0%), and 6 (20.0%) patients achieved grade 1, 2, and 3 pathological responses. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20%. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.6% and 77.7% respectively; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.6% and 90.1%, separately. What's more, better clinical response (P = 0.046); achievement of ORR (P = 0.014), and better pathological response (P = 0.020) were correlated with longer DFS. Besides, ORR achievement was linked with longer OS (P = 0.040). Most adverse events were relatively mild and manageable. Grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting. No grade 4 adverse events were witnessed. CONCLUSION SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy achieves a satisfying clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and tolerable safety in LAGC patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang Z, He T, Yu D, Qin X, Geng A, Yang H. Neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S‑1)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma. Exp Ther Med 2022; 24:625. [PMID: 36160880 PMCID: PMC9468841 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma (LAGC). Therefore, patients with LAGC treated with neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy (apatinib + SOX group; n=25) or SOX chemotherapy (SOX group; n=35) were enrolled in the present study. Subsequently, the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were recorded. The results showed that patients in the apatinib + SOX group exhibited a higher ORR (64.0 vs. 37.1%; P=0.040), but a similar DCR (96.0 vs. 88.6%; P=0.580), compared with those in the SOX group. The pathological response rates in patients with grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 LAGC were 0.0, 20.8, 62.5 and 16.7%, respectively, in the apatinib + SOX group, while in those treated with SOX alone they were 9.1, 39.4, 42.4 and 9.1%, respectively. By contrast, the pathological response was elevated in the apatinib + SOX group compared with the SOX group (P=0.030). During a median follow-up period of 21.0 months (range, 6.4-38.1 months), median DFS and OS were not reached. More specifically, the 1-, 2- and 3-year DFS rates were 91.7, 75.2 and 75.2% in the apatinib + SOX group and 71.8, 59.6 and 44.7% in the SOX group, respectively. In addition, the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 100.0, 89.6 and 78.4% in the apatinib + SOX group, while those in the SOX group were 90.3, 69.2 and 55.4%, respectively. However, no differences in DFS (P=0.094) or OS (P=0.155) were observed between the two groups. Additionally, the most common adverse events in the SOX group were mild leukopenia (42.9%) and fatigue (34.3%), while those in the apatinib + SOX group were tolerable leukopenia (44.0%) and hypertension (44.0%). In conclusion, the present study suggested that neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy could be more effective and tolerable compared with SOX chemotherapy alone in patients with LAGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenfeng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Liaocheng, Shandong 252699, P.R. China
| | - Tingbang He
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xiajin Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Xiajin, Dezhou, Shandong 253299, P.R. China
| | - Deguo Yu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Liaocheng, Shandong 252699, P.R. China
| | - Xiantao Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Liaocheng, Shandong 252699, P.R. China
| | - Aizhi Geng
- Department of Gynecology, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Liaocheng, Shandong 252699, P.R. China
| | - Hailei Yang
- Department of Gynecology, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, Liaocheng, Shandong 252699, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen J, Guo Y, Fang M, Yuan Y, Zhu Y, Xin Y, Zhang L. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:927119. [PMID: 35992846 PMCID: PMC9388908 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the clinical curative effects and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer compared to those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy were performed in patients with resectable gastric cancer. Results Seven RCTs were included (601 patients; 302 in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 299 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group had an increased number of patients with a complete response [odds ratio (OR) = 3.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68–8.54, p = 0.001] and improved objective response rate (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.69–4.57, p < 0.0001), 1-year (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.40–8.81, p = 0.007) and 3-year (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.30–3.50, p = 0.003) survival rates, R0 resection rate (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.39–3.50, p = 0.0008), and complete pathologic response (OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.59–12.14, p = 0.004). Regarding the incidence of adverse effects after neoadjuvant therapy, only the occurrence rate of gastrointestinal reaction in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group was higher than that in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.09–2.85, p = 0.02), and there was no significant difference in other adverse effects. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer has several advantages in terms of efficacy and safety compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has great potential as an effective therapy for resectable gastric cancers. Systematic Review Registration https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0164, registration number INPLASY202230164.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiuzhou Chen
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yaru Guo
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Miao Fang
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yan Yuan
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Youqi Zhu
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yong Xin
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- *Correspondence: Yong Xin, ; Longzhen Zhang,
| | - Longzhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China
- *Correspondence: Yong Xin, ; Longzhen Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shi J, Li N, Tang Y, Jiang L, Yang L, Wang S, Song Y, Liu Y, Fang H, Lu N, Qi S, Chen B, Li Z, Liu S, Wang J, Wang W, Zhu S, Yang J, Li Y, Zhao D, Jin J. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:359. [PMID: 35902798 PMCID: PMC9331588 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02440-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer ranks high in terms of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multimodal therapy is therefore essential for locally advanced gastric cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that both perioperative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the completion rate of chemotherapy after surgery remains low, which may affect survival. Thus, identifying the best way to combine radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery is important. The aim of this study was to explore the toxicity and efficacy of the total neoadjuvant therapy modality for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods This study will be a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced (stage cT3-4 and cN positive, AJCC 8th) gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma will be enrolled. Patients will initially receive radiotherapy (95% planned target volume: 45 Gy/25 f) and concurrent chemotherapy (S-1: 40–60 mg twice a day) followed by six cycles of consolidated chemotherapy (SOX, consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin) and surgery. The primary objective will assess pathological complete response; the secondary objectives will include toxicities assessing surgical complications, the tumor downstaging rate and the R0 resection rate. Discussion Investigation of total neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer is limited. The goal of this trial is to explore the efficacy and toxicity of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04062058, August 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinming Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongwen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ningning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shunan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Shixin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wenling Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guizhou Provincial Cancer Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Suyu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, China
| | - Jialin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongbing Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study. Ir J Med Sci 2022:10.1007/s11845-022-03075-x. [PMID: 35819743 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03075-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apatinib, a small molecule targeting VEGFR2, is commonly used for advanced gastric cancer treatment. This prospective cohort study further investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients. METHODS Ninety-six locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients were divided into the apatinib plus chemotherapy group (N = 45) and chemotherapy group (N = 51) according to their chosen treatment. Apatinib was administered (375 mg/day), and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapOx) was given as chemotherapy, for 3 cycles with 3 weeks a cycle before surgery. RESULTS The objective response rate (62.2% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.015) and pathological response grade (P = 0.011) were better; meanwhile, the tumor-resection rate (95.6% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.143) and pathological complete response rate (23.3% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.080) exhibited increasing trends (without statistical significance) in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. Additionally, the apatinib plus chemotherapy group achieved prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047) compared with the chemotherapy group. After adjusted by multivariate Cox's regression analysis, neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy was still superior to chemotherapy regarding DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.277, P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.316, P = 0.038). Notably, the incidences of adverse events between the two groups were not different (P > 0.050). Moreover, the most common adverse events of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy were leukopenia (42.2%), fatigue (37.8%), hypertension (37.8%), and anemia (31.1%). CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy realizes better clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and non-inferior safety profile compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.
Collapse
|
33
|
Yang ZY, Yuan F, Lu S, Xu W, Wu JW, Xi WQ, Shi M, Wang ZQ, Ni ZT, He CY, Yao XX, Zheng YN, Zhu ZL, Liu WT, Zhang J, Zhang H, Li C, Yan C, Yan M, Zhu ZG. Efficacy and Safety of Conversion Therapy by Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Paclitaxel Plus Oral S-1 in Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Prospective Phase II Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:905922. [PMID: 35795055 PMCID: PMC9251062 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundNeoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) has shown promising results in gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis. However, clinical practice experience of NIPS is still lacking in China. In this study, we investigate the efficacy and safety of NIPS in Chinese patients.MethodsEligible patients received NIPS every 3 weeks. Gastrectomy was performed for patients who met the criteria of conversion surgery. The primary end point was 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, toxic effects, conversion surgery outcomes and median survival time (MST).ResultsSixty-seven patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was achieved with 1-year OS rate reached 67.2% (95% CI, 56.8%-79.4%). Conversion surgery was performed in 42 patients (62.9%), and R0 resection was achieved in 23 patients (54.8%) with the MST of 31.3 months (95% CI, 24.3-38.3). And the MST was 19.3 months (95% CI, 16.4-22.2) for all patients. Toxicity and surgical complications were well-tolerated. Moreover, sex, R0 resection, pathological nodal stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) were independent prognostic factors for patients who underwent conversion surgery.ConclusionThe NIPS is effective and safe in treating GC patients with peritoneal metastasis. Male patients, patients who underwent R0 resection, patients with ypN0-1 or TRG 1 after conversion surgery are more likely to benefit from the NIPS.Clinical Trial Registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (<ChiCTR2200056029>).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-Yin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Yuan
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun-Wei Wu
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Qi Xi
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Shi
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Qiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Tian Ni
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chang-Yu He
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-Xin Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ya-Nan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng-Lun Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Tao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Chao Yan, ; Min Yan, ; Zheng-Gang Zhu,
| | - Min Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Chao Yan, ; Min Yan, ; Zheng-Gang Zhu,
| | - Zheng-Gang Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Key laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Chao Yan, ; Min Yan, ; Zheng-Gang Zhu,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yeh JH, Yeh YS, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Chang TK, Su WC, Wang JY. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123026. [PMID: 35740693 PMCID: PMC9221037 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary More than 50% of gastric cancer are at least locally advanced at presentation. For such patients, a multimodal approach rather than mere surgical resection leads to better long-term prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is one of the common treatment strategies for local advanced gastric cancer. Based on the experience and evidence from esophago-gastric cancers, the incorporation of systemic and locoregional therapy has shown superior disease control and reduced local recurrence. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen, patient selection, technical consideration and potential biomarkers are still under investigation. Furthermore, the comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy is also an important issue to be answered. In the review article, we addressed the current available evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Future studies and ongoing trials will be necessary to determine the best candidate and the role of newer systemic and radiation therapies in such patients. NCRT is a feasible treatment option for LAGC, with the ability to achieve favorable disease control and enable higher radical resection rates over those afforded by perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. Large clinical trials examining the comparative efficacy of NCRT and NCT are underway. The discrepancy between the satisfactory pCR rates associated with NCRT and the nonsignificant association between NCRT and survival warrants further exploration. Furthermore, newer therapies such as immunotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy may be implemented in con-junction with NCRT, and the development of useful biomarkers may ultimately lead to the de-velopment of personalized treatments for LAGC. These research directions may lead to the dis-covery of the optimal approach to administering NCRT to patients with LAGC. They may also aid in the determination of the optimal candidates for undergoing NCRT. Abstract Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Dachang Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Department of Medical technology, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Sung Yeh
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wen Huang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Kun Chang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Su
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-3122805; Fax: +886-7-3114679
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Li B, Tang R, Zhang G, Cheng J, Chao M, Ding K. The efficacy and safety of continuous intra-arterial infusion neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer: a preliminary pilot study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:968-976. [PMID: 35837182 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by R0 resection is regarded as a standard treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC); however, the response to systemic chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory. Continuous intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (CAIC) is a new method, compared with systematic chemotherapy, it can deliver chemotherapy drugs more accurately, so as to achieve higher surgical conversion rate. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of CAIC in locally advanced GC patients. Methods In this retrospective pilot study, four patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced GC were identified from a tertiary hospital between May 2018 and December 2018. Clinic stage was belonged to T4N1-3M0 in all cases with potential probability for surgery. All cases received three cycles of NAC by CAIC with oxaliplatin (100 mg on day 1) plus oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day twice daily for 14 days) (SOX). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans and pathological examinations were performed to evaluate chemotherapeutic response based on the tumor regression grade (TRG) and post-neoadjuvant pathological Tumor Node Metastasis (ypTNM) staging. All cases were regularly followed up with face-to-face interviews at outpatient, abdominal enhanced CT scan and serum tumor markers were be requested at 3-month intervals for up to 1 year postoperatively. Results The obstruction was significantly alleviated after three cycles of CAIC. Contrast-enhanced CT scans showed decreased tumor volume to some extent, along with lymph node shrinkage after treatment. Radical (R0) resection was achieved in all cases. Histopathological analysis showed tumor downstaging in three cases and upstaging in one case. The tumor response to treatment demonstrated TRG1a in one case, TRG1b in one case, and TRG2 in two cases, with an overall tumor regression rate of 100%. No obvious adverse events or perioperative complications were observed during or following treatment. All cases were alive without tumor recurrence or progression after the 1-year postoperative follow-up. Conclusions Our study may shed light on super-selective CAIC as an effective method for improving the NAC response in locally advanced GC. Future studies with a larger sample sizes and long-term outcomes are required for a final conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rui Tang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guangqiang Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingkai Cheng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Chao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kefeng Ding
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yu D, Wang Z, He T, Yang L. Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel/Cisplatin/Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study. Front Surg 2022; 9:842828. [PMID: 35647008 PMCID: PMC9130594 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen presents good efficacy in patients with locally advanced cancer. However, its role in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is not clear. Thus, the study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant BEV plus chemotherapy in patients with LAGC.MethodsTwenty resectable patients with LAGC who received BEV plus docetaxel/cisplatin/capecitabine (DCC) chemotherapy for 3 cycles with 21 days as one cycle as neoadjuvant regimen were involved. Besides, their treatment response, survival profiles, and adverse events were assessed.ResultsIn total, two (10.0%), 9 (45.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 1 (5.0%) patients achieved complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) according to imaging evaluation, which resulted in 55.0% of objective response rate and 95.0% of disease control rate, respectively. Moreover, the number of patients with pathological response grades 1, 2, and 3 was 8 (40.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 3 (15.0%); while 1 (5.0%) patient did not receive surgery due to PD, thus the data of this patient was not assessable. Meanwhile, 18 (90.0%) patients achieved R0 resection. Regarding survival profile, the median disease-free survival or overall survival were both not reached. The 1-year, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 88.8, 80.7, and 67.3%. Meanwhile, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 75.8%, and 75.8%, respectively. Additionally, the main adverse events were anemia (90.0%), alopecia (90.0%), leukopenia (70.0%), and anorexia (65.0%). Indeed, most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and were manageable.ConclusionNeoadjuvant BEV plus DCC chemotherapy presents a favorable pathological response and survival profile with acceptable safety in patients with LAGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deguo Yu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| | - Zhenfeng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| | - Tingbang He
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of XiaJin Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Xiajin, China
- *Correspondence: Tingbang He
| | - Lijun Yang
- Department of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases. MOLECULES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 27:molecules27082466. [PMID: 35458666 PMCID: PMC9031877 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27082466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The problems with anticancer therapy are resistance and toxicity. From 3000 Cisplatin derivatives tested as antitumor agents, most of them have been rejected, due to toxicity. The aim of current study is the comparison of therapeutic combinations of the currently applied in clinical practice: Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, Heptaplatin, and Satraplatin. The literature data show that the strategies for the development of platinum anticancer agents and bypassing of resistance to Cisplatin derivatives and their toxicity are: combination therapy, Pt IV prodrugs, the targeted nanocarriers. The very important strategy for the improvement of the antitumor effect against different cancers is synergistic combination of Cisplatin derivatives with: (1) anticancer agents—Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Cytarabine, Fludarabine, Pemetrexed, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Topotecan, Etoposide, Amrubicin, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel; (2) modulators of resistant mechanisms; (3) signaling protein inhibitors—Erlotinib; Bortezomib; Everolimus; (4) and immunotherapeutic drugs—Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Bevacizumab, Cemiplimab, Cetuximab, Durvalumab, Erlotinib, Imatinib, Necitumumab, Nimotuzumab, Nivolumab, Onartuzumab, Panitumumab, Pembrolizumab, Rilotumumab, Trastuzumab, Tremelimumab, and Sintilimab. An important approach for overcoming the drug resistance and reduction of toxicity of Cisplatin derivatives is the application of nanocarriers (polymers and liposomes), which provide improved targeted delivery, increased intracellular penetration, selective accumulation in tumor tissue, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The advantages of combination therapy are maximum removal of tumor cells in different phases; prevention of resistance; inhibition of the adaptation of tumor cells and their mutations; and reduction of toxicity.
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen Y, Xu W, Li YL, Liu W, Sah BK, Wang L, Xu Z, Wels M, Zheng Y, Yan M, Zhang H, Ma Q, Zhu Z, Li C. CT-Based Radiomics Showing Generalization to Predict Tumor Regression Grade for Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:758863. [PMID: 35280802 PMCID: PMC8913538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.758863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics model to predict treatment response in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) sensitive to neoadjuvant therapies and verify its generalization among different regimens, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and molecular targeted therapy. Materials and Methods A total of 373 patients with AGC receiving neoadjuvant therapies were enrolled from five cohorts. Four cohorts of patients received different regimens of NAC, including three retrospective cohorts (training cohort and internal and external validation cohorts) and a prospective Dragon III cohort (NCT03636893). Another prospective SOXA (apatinib in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin) cohort received neoadjuvant molecular targeted therapy (ChiCTR-OPC-16010061). All patients underwent computed tomography before treatment, and thereafter, tumor regression grade (TRG) was assessed. The primary tumor was delineated, and 2,452 radiomics features were extracted for each patient. Mutual information and random forest were used for dimensionality reduction and modeling. The performance of the radiomics model to predict TRG under different neoadjuvant therapies was evaluated. Results There were 28 radiomics features selected. The radiomics model showed generalization to predict TRG for AGC patients across different NAC regimens, with areas under the curve (AUCs) (95% interval confidence) of 0.82 (0.76~0.90), 0.77 (0.63~0.91), 0.78 (0.66~0.89), and 0.72 (0.66~0.89) in the four cohorts, with no statistical difference observed (all p > 0.05). However, the radiomics model showed poor predictive value on the SOXA cohort [AUC, 0.50 (0.27~0.73)], which was significantly worse than that in the training cohort (p = 0.010). Conclusion Radiomics is generalizable to predict TRG for AGC patients receiving NAC treatments, which is beneficial to transform appropriate treatment, especially for those insensitive to NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan-Ling Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wentao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Birendra Kumar Sah
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhihan Xu
- Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Michael Wels
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging Computed Tomography Image Analytics, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Yanan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qianchen Ma
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenggang Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ozer M, Goksu SY, Sanford NN, Porembka M, Khurshid H, Ahn C, Maxwell MC, Beg MS, Kazmi SM. A Propensity Score Analysis of Chemotherapy Use in Patients With Resectable Gallbladder Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2146912. [PMID: 35171262 PMCID: PMC8851300 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Gallbladder cancer is uncommon but highly fatal. Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized or locoregionally advanced gallbladder cancer. The rate of use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable gallbladder cancer is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer and survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The National Cancer Database was used to identify 6391 adults who underwent definitive surgical resection for gallbladder cancers between January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2016. Data analysis was performed from January 15 to February 15, 2020. Patients with localized or locoregionally advanced gallbladder cancers (ie, categories cTx-cT4, cN0-2, and cM0) were categorized as receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or surgery alone. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, with 1:3 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes between groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The use and survival outcomes of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Of 6391 patients who underwent definitive surgery for gallbladder cancer, 4559 were women (71.3%); median age was 68 (IQR, 59-77) years. A total of 3145 patients (49.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 3145 patients (49.2%) underwent surgery without chemotherapy, and 101 patients (1.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use was associated with treatment at an academic facility (61 patients [60%] vs 38 patients [38%] treated in a nonacademic facility; P < .001) and in those with private insurance (65 patients [65%] vs 11 patients [11%] with Medicaid insurance; P < .001). Surgery alone was frequently used in older patients (median age, 72 [IQR, 63-81] years vs 59 [IQR, 52-66] years in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001), those with Medicare insurance (1925 patients [57%] vs 1438 patients [43%] with adjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001), and patients with a higher comorbidity index score (326 patients [62%] vs 197 patients [38%] with adjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001). Adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently than surgery in patients with node-positive cancer (1482 [67.2%] vs 53 [65.4%] vs 912 [49.7%]). On propensity score matching analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with longer survival than surgery alone (22 vs 18 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96); survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not statistically significant compared with surgery alone and adjuvant chemotherapy groups (27 months, HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04). However, in patients with node-positive gallbladder cancer, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with longer median overall survival (30 months [95% CI, 24-36 months] vs 14 months [95% CI, 11-17] in patients with surgery alone; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was low in patients with surgically resected gallbladder cancers. Chemotherapy was used more frequently than surgery in lymph node-positive disease compared with lymph node-negative disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a survival advantage in resectable gallbladder cancer, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased survival in node-positive gallbladder cancers. These findings suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in treatment of gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammet Ozer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Capital Health Regional Medical Center, Trenton, New Jersey
| | - Suleyman Y. Goksu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Nina N. Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Matthew Porembka
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Hajra Khurshid
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Mary Claire Maxwell
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Muhammad Shaalan Beg
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Syed M. Kazmi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kuang XH, Li J. Dilemma in selection of treatment for preoperative anemia in patients with gastric cancer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:92-99. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i2.92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the common comorbidities of patients with gastric cancer waiting for gastrectomy is anemia, which negatively affects the postoperative outcomes and prognosis. Therefore, preoperative anemia often needs to be corrected. The most commonly used strategy to treat preoperative anemia in gastric cancer is transfusion. Currently, a large amount of evidence shows that transfusion can increase the incidence of postoperative complications and affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, there is a dilemma in choosing the treatment for preoperative anemia in patients with gastric cancer. Surgeons need to fully understand the duality of therapy strategies for preoperative anemia in gastric cancer patients. In this study, we review the studies on preoperative anemia and its treatment in patients with gastric cancer, aiming to help clinicians manage patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer better.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lin JL, Lin JX, Lin JP, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Huang CM. Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer With Serosal Invasion. Front Immunol 2022; 12:783243. [PMID: 35116023 PMCID: PMC8805791 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.783243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for the treatment of gastric cancer with serosal invasion.MethodTwo hundred patients with gastric cancer with serosal invasion who received neoadjuvant therapy from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different neoadjuvant therapy regimens, the patients were divided into the following three groups: the SOX group (S-1 + oxaliplatin) (72 patients), SAP group (S-1 + nab-paclitaxel) (95 patients) and C-SAP group (camrelizumab + S-1 + nab-paclitaxel) (33 patients).ResultThe pathological response (TRG 1a/1b) in the C-SAP group (39.4%) was not significantly different from that in the SAP group (26.3%) and was significantly higher than that in the SOX group (18.1%). The rate of ypT0 in the C-SAP group (24.2%) was higher than that in the SAP group (6.3%) and the SOX group (5.6%). The rate of ypN0 in the C-SAP group (66.7%) was also higher than that in the SAP group (38.9%) and the SOX group (36.1%). The rate of pCR in the C-SAP group (21.2%) was higher than that in the SAP group (5.3%) and the SOX group (2.8%). The use of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody was an independent protective factor for TRG grade (1a/1b). The use of camrelizumab did not increase postoperative complications or the adverse effects of neoadjuvant therapy.ConclusionCamrelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 could significantly improve the rate of tumor regression grade (TRG 1a/1b) and the rate of pCR in gastric cancer with serosal invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Li Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Peng Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Chang-Ming Huang, ; orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-885X
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hasegawa H, Shitara K, Takiguchi S, Takiguchi N, Ito S, Kochi M, Horinouchi H, Kinoshita T, Yoshikawa T, Muro K, Nishikawa H, Suna H, Kodera Y. A multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase I trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:619-628. [PMID: 35254550 PMCID: PMC9013329 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01286-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nivolumab monotherapy has demonstrated superior efficacy in advanced unresectable gastric cancer (GC), but its impact on resectable GC remains unknown. This phase I study aimed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy in resectable GC. METHODS Untreated, resectable, cT2 or more advanced gastric adenocarcinomas with clinical stage I, II, or III were treated with two doses of nivolumab before gastrectomy. Patients were excluded if their tumors may be applicable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse event (AE) categories of special interest. RESULTS All of the 31 enrolled patients completed 2 doses of nivolumab monotherapy. While 30 (97%) patients underwent surgery with curative intent, 1 patient discontinued before the planned surgical intervention because of a newly emerging liver metastasis. Seven patients (23%) had nivolumab treatment-related AEs, and one patient had a treatment-related AE of grade 3-4. The incidences of treatment-related AE categories of special interest ranged from 0 to 6%. Notable surgical complications included two cases of grade 3 anastomotic leakage and two cases of pancreatic fistula. The major pathologic response (MPR) assessed by the independent pathology review committee was achieved in five (16%) patients, of which one patient had a pathologic complete response. The MPR was mostly observed in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, high microsatellite instability, and/or high tumor mutation burden. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy is feasible with an acceptable safety profile and induces a MPR in certain patients with resectable GC. (Registration: clinicaltrials.jp, JapicCTI-183895).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotaka Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Kohei Shitara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shuji Takiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Noriaki Takiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Seiji Ito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Kochi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidehito Horinouchi
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kinoshita
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Nishikawa
- Division of Cancer Immunology, Research Institute/Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Immunology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideaki Suna
- Clinical Development Planning Division, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Xu P, Zhang X, Cao J, Yang J, Chen Z, Wang W, Wang S, Zhang L, Xie L, Fang L, Xia Y, Xuan Z, Lv J, Xu H, Xu Z. The novel role of circular RNA ST3GAL6 on blocking gastric cancer malignant behaviours through autophagy regulated by the FOXP2/MET/mTOR axis. Clin Transl Med 2022; 12:e707. [PMID: 35061934 PMCID: PMC8782491 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks third in mortality among all cancers worldwide. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) play an important role in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. Forkhead box P2 (FOXP2), as a transcription factor, is closely associated with the development of many types of tumours. However, the regulatory network between FOXP2 and circRNAs remains to be explored. In our study, circST3GAL6 was significantly downregulated in GC and was associated with poor prognosis in GC patients. Overexpression of circST3GAL6 inhibited the malignant behaviours of GC cells, which was mediated by inducing apoptosis and autophagy. In addition, we demonstrated that circST3GAL6 regulated FOXP2 through the mir-300 sponge. We further found that FOXP2 inhibited MET Proto-Oncogene (MET), which was the initiating factor that regulated the classic AKT/mTOR pathway of autophagy. In conclusion, our results suggested that circST3GAL6 played a tumour suppressive role in gastric cancer through miR-300/FOXP2 axis and regulated apoptosis and autophagy through FOXP2-mediated transcriptional inhibition of the MET axis, which may become a potential target for GC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penghui Xu
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Xing Zhang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jiacheng Cao
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Zetian Chen
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Weizhi Wang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Sen Wang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Li Xie
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Lang Fang
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Yiwen Xia
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Zhe Xuan
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jialun Lv
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
- Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer MedicineNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Zekuan Xu
- Department of General Surgerythe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized MedicineNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
- Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer MedicineNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chen Y, He J, Liu D, Xiao J, Chen X, Tang H, Luo D, Shang C, Lian L, Peng J. Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1328. [PMID: 34903191 PMCID: PMC8667459 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09093-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the differences between doublet and triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens in efficacy and safety profile. METHODS A total of 227 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients who received NAC and sequential radical gastrectomy were reviewed. After propensity score matching (PSM), 140 patients with similar baseline characteristics were selected. Among them, 70 received doublet NAC regimens consisted of platinum and fluorouracil; the other 70 received triplet NAC regimens consisted of docetaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil. RESULTS The efficacy of doublet and triplet regimens was comparable after propensity score matching in terms of tumor regression (pathological complete response, Doublet 11.4% vs. Triplet 15.7%, p = 0.642), achieving of R0 resection (Doublet 88.6% vs. Triplet 88.6%, p = 1), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (Doublet 77.1% vs. Triplet 68.6%, p = 0.178), 3-years overall survival (OS) (Doublet 54.3% vs. Triplet 60.9%, p = 0.941). Post-surgery complications were more common in the triplet cohort (Doublet 5.7% vs. Triplet 27.1%, p = 0.001), especially abdominal infection (Doublet 0% vs. Triplet 11.1%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A more intense preoperative triplet NAC regimen does not bring extra downstage effect and survival benefit compared to a doublet regimen. It may even result in a higher risk of post-surgery complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghe Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Jiasheng He
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Laboratory Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510105, China
| | - Jian Xiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Xijie Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Haijie Tang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Dandong Luo
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Chenyu Shang
- Department of Laboratory Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510105, China
| | - Lei Lian
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
| | - Junsheng Peng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Deng L, Groman A, Jiang C, Perimbeti S, Gabriel E, Kukar M, Mukherjee S. Association of Preoperative Chemosensitivity With Postoperative Survival in Patients With Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2135340. [PMID: 34797369 PMCID: PMC8605482 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Considering its low completion rate, the survival benefit associated with postoperative chemotherapy (PC) is unclear in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who received preoperative chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To determine whether preoperative chemosensitivity is associated with postoperative survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who receive PC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This national, hospital-based cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, which covers more than 70% newly diagnosed gastric adenocarcinomas in the US, between 2006 and 2017. Participants included patients with clinical stage II or III disease treated with preoperative chemotherapy and curative-intent resection, excluding radiotherapy. Preoperative chemosensitivity was defined as very sensitive (ypT0N0), sensitive (pathological TNM stage less than clinical, excluding ypT0N0), and refractory (pathological greater than or equal to clinical). Data were analyzed in April 2021. EXPOSURES Receipt of PC or not. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival from surgical discharge. RESULTS This study included 2382 patients (1599 men [67%]; median [IQR] age, 63 [54-70] years). Most patients (1524 patients [64%]) received no PC. Most patients (1483 patients [62%]) had refractory disease, followed by sensitive disease (727 patients [31%]) and very sensitive disease (172 patients [7%]). Patients with older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), comorbidity (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90), longer time from chemotherapy initiation to surgery (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), less sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy (very sensitive vs refractory OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.89; sensitive vs refractory OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.20), and longer surgical hospitalization (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97) had a significantly lower likelihood of receiving PC. PC was not associated with improved survival in the whole group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.02). Patients with refractory disease had the worst survival compared with patients with sensitive disease (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.46) and those with very sensitive disease (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.20). Preoperative chemosensitivity was significantly associated with the survival benefit from PC (P for interaction = .03). PC was significantly associated with longer survival in patients with sensitive disease (5-year survival rate, 73.8% in the PC group vs 65.0% in the no PC group; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91), but not in those with very sensitive disease (5-year survival rate, 80.0% in the PC group vs 90.8% in the no PC group; HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 0.81-7.43) and those with refractory disease (5-year survival rate, 41.8% in the PC group vs 40.7% in the no PC group; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, preoperative chemosensitivity was associated with survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who received PC. These findings may help inform future studies to personalize postoperative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Deng
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Adrienne Groman
- Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Changchuan Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Stuthi Perimbeti
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Moshim Kukar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sarbajit Mukherjee
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ding Y, Jiang J, Xu N. Comment on: "Phase II study of S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastric or esophagogastric junction: KSCC1601. Gastric cancer, 2021 Aug 11" by Iwatsuki et al. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:1376-1377. [PMID: 34515901 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01247-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yongfeng Ding
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junjie Jiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Nong Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Feng Q, Long D, Du MS, Wang XS, Li ZS, Zhao YL, Qian F, Wen Y, Yu PW, Shi Y. Short-Term Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Siewert Type II and III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:690662. [PMID: 34660265 PMCID: PMC8511681 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been increasingly used for the treatment of locally advanced Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). However, whether LG can achieve the same short-term efficacy in the treatment of patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of NACT combined with LG for Siewert type II and III AEG. Methods This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced Siewert type II and III AEG diagnosed between May 2011 and October 2020 using the clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) staging system. The short-term outcomes were compared between the matched groups using a 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) method, which was performed to reduce bias in patient selection. Results After PSM, 164 patients were selected, including 41 in the NACT group and 123 in the LG group. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared with the LG group, the NACT group exhibit a smaller tumor size and significantly less advanced pathological tumor classification and nodal classification stages. The time to first flatus of the NACT group was significantly shorter, but the hospital stay was significantly longer than that of the LG group. The NACT group showed similar overall (29.3% vs 25.2%, P=0.683), systemic (24.4% vs 21.1%, P=0.663), local (12.2% vs 9.8%, P=0.767), minor (19.5% vs 19.5%, P=1.000) and major (9.8% vs 5.7%, P=0.470) complications as the LG group. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in most stratified parameters. Operation time≥ 300 minutes was identified as an independent risk factor for overall complications. Age≥ 60 years was identified as an independent risk factor for major complications. Conclusion NACT combined with LG for AEG does not increase the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with LG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Feng
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Du Long
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ming-Shan Du
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Song Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhen-Shun Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong-Liang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Feng Qian
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yan Wen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Pei-Wu Yu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yan Shi
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lieto E, Auricchio A, Tirino G, Pompella L, Panarese I, Del Sorbo G, Ferraraccio F, De Vita F, Galizia G, Cardella F. Naples Prognostic Score Predicts Tumor Regression Grade in Resectable Gastric Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184676. [PMID: 34572903 PMCID: PMC8471422 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Multimodal treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer is still debated today due to controversial results in different trials. Nevertheless, perioperative chemotherapy with radical surgery certainly shows a better long-term outcome than surgery alone, so much so it is the main multimodal treatment offered in Europe, at the present. Tumor regression grade is the objective response to preoperative chemotherapy and its extent, in terms of reduction of neoplastic cells in the resected specimen, is strongly affected by Lauren’s classification, TNM stage, and tumor grading. Therefore, since this information can be achieved only after surgical resection, the return of chemotherapy is quite unpredictable in advance and, in about half cases, it is definitely ineffective. Naples Prognostic Score, that mirrors the immune–nutritional conditions, tested on 59 consecutive advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing multimodal treatment, showed a strong power in predicting tumor regression grade and therefore is strictly correlated with long-term outcome and survival. Abstract Despite recent progresses, locally advanced gastric cancer remains a daunting challenge to embrace. Perioperative chemotherapy and D2-gastrectomy depict multimodal treatment of gastric cancer in Europe, shows better results than curative surgery alone in terms of downstaging, micrometastases elimination, and improved long-term survival. Unfortunately, preoperative chemotherapy is useless in about 50% of cases of non-responder patients, in which no effect is registered. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is directly related to chemotherapy effectiveness, but its understanding is achieved only after surgical operation; accordingly, preoperative chemotherapy is given indiscriminately. Conversely, Naples Prognostic Score (NPS), related to patient immune-nutritional status and easily obtained before taking any therapeutic decision, appeared an independent prognostic variable of TRG. NPS was calculated in 59 consecutive surgically treated gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant FLOT4-based chemotherapy. 42.2% of positive responses were observed: all normal NPS and half mild/moderate NPS showed significant responses to chemotherapy with TRG 1–3; while only 20% of the worst NPS showed some related benefits. Evaluation of NPS in gastric cancer patients undergoing multimodal treatment may be useful both in selecting patients who will benefit from preoperative chemotherapy and for changing immune-nutritional conditions in order to improve patient’s reaction against the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Lieto
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (A.A.); (G.D.S.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Annamaria Auricchio
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (A.A.); (G.D.S.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (G.T.); (L.P.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (G.T.); (L.P.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Iacopo Panarese
- Division of Pathology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (I.P.); (F.F.)
| | - Giovanni Del Sorbo
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (A.A.); (G.D.S.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Francesca Ferraraccio
- Division of Pathology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (I.P.); (F.F.)
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (G.T.); (L.P.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Gennaro Galizia
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (A.A.); (G.D.S.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Francesca Cardella
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Vanvitelli University, 80132 Napoli, Italy; (A.A.); (G.D.S.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Michael A, Nath DK. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Strategy of Colorectal Mixed Adeno-Neuroendocrine Carcinomas. Cureus 2021; 13:e16645. [PMID: 34458045 PMCID: PMC8384403 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) is a rare pathological diagnosis characterized by the presence of both adeno-carcinomatous and neuroendocrine differentiation with each component comprising 30% of the tumor. This literature review is aimed at the extraction of all existing clinical studies and reviews on colorectal MANEC so as to ensure that a suitable chemotherapeutic regimen is chosen to improve survival outcomes and prognosis of the disease. Parallel search strategies were employed to extract past 10 years articles from PubMed, PubMed Central and Google Scholar databases. A total of 30 records consisting of one clinical trial, five retrospective cohort studies, one case control study, one case series, 16 case reports and six review papers were shortlisted. Chemotherapeutic regimens that were administered as an adjuvant and a neoadjuvant therapy were analyzed with their survival outcomes. The overall survival rate of those administered with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy can be as high as 57.4% and 69%, respectively. Multiple chemotherapeutic regimens were employed in colorectal MANEC and superiority of one regimen over the other can’t be established. Any drug or combination of drugs that is responsive against either of the MANEC components is found to be effective against the tumor. However, excellent responsiveness has been found with 5-fluorouracil regimens as a neoadjuvant therapy and platinum-based combinations as an adjuvant therapy. XELOX, streptozocin and S1 regimens also prove to be drugs of choice in aggressive and metastasized disease conditions. Our analysis allows for improved chemotherapeutic management of individuals with colorectal MANEC and establishes an increased potential for use of streptozocin therapy in the clinical setting. However, newer drugs like amrubicin require further research prior to describing its efficacy in colorectal MANEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Michael
- Internal Medicine, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, IND
| | - Debashis K Nath
- Internal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Kings Lynn, King's Lynn, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Liang C, Wu HM, Yu WM, Chen W. Research status on immunotherapy trials of gastric cancer. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:5782-5793. [PMID: 34368297 PMCID: PMC8316931 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The breakthrough of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has created extensive opportunities for cancer immunotherapy. Especially, the block of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis using ICIs has become a new therapeutic strategy to treat advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, in the past decade, single-arm and randomized trials for single-drug ICI therapy showed that the therapeutic effect was not satisfactory, including clinical trials for advanced GC. However, after selecting suitable predictive biomarkers and developing a combination of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs and other chemotherapeutic drugs, the objective response rate and progression-free survival of patients with gastric cancer were improved significantly. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved treatment with pembrolizumab for patients with advanced GC with PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficiency. In this review, the updated data from the latest trial results of combination immunotherapy for GC are presented. Based on the outcome of combination therapy, we discuss its possible molecular mechanism and summarize effective predictive biomarkers. We also discuss possible problems stemming from results of other clinical trials of ICI treatment and propose other directions for ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Heng-Miao Wu
- Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei-Ming Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Cancer Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|