The Neo-PLANET phase II trial of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction

Unveiling promising targets in gastric cancer therapy: A comprehensive review

Gastric cancer (GC) poses a significant global health challenge, ranking fifth in incidence and third in mortality among all malignancies worldwide. Its insidious onset, aggressive growth, proclivity for metastasis, and limited treatment options have contributed to its high fatality rate. Traditional approaches for GC treatment primarily involve surgery and chemotherapy. However, there is growing interest in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This comprehensive review highlights recent advancements in GC targeted therapy and immunotherapy. It delves into the mechanisms of various strategies, underscoring their potential in GC treatment. Additionally, the review evaluates the efficacy and safety of relevant clinical trials. Despite the benefits observed in numerous advanced GC patients with targeted therapies and immunotherapies, challenges persist. We discuss pertinent strategies to overcome these challenges, thereby providing a solid foundation for enhancing the clinical effectiveness of targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Current status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. At present, comprehensive surgical treatment has enhanced the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer patients significantly. However, the postoperative recurrence rate remains high, and the long-term survival for patients is sub-optimal. In recent years, immunotherapy has garnered extensive attention as an innovative approach to the treatment of gastric cancer. Indeed, multiple studies have validated its therapeutic effects in advanced gastric cancer patients, leading to its incorporation into treatment guidelines. Currently, researchers are exploring the application of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting globally in order to further adjust and refine neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens for gastric cancer. This article summarizes the research progress and controversies associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastric cancer, aiming to optimize clinical benefits for gastric cancer patients undergoing this treatment approach. The retrieval methods of this study encompassed databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, etc. The retrieved articles included guidelines, consensus, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and reviews related to locally advanced gastric cancer published up to January 2024.

Two-Year Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy from the Phase II WuhanUHGI001 Trial

BACKGROUND

This study reports the 2-year outcomes and biomarker analysis results of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in a phase II WuhanUHGI001 trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients with cT3/4aN+M0 locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were screened, enrolled, and treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab and SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 5 cycles of postoperative adjuvant SOX. The primary endpoint was major pathological response.

RESULTS

Of the 49 included patients, 24 (49.0%) achieved major pathological response and 13 (26.5%) achieved pathological complete response. During a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 69.4% and 81.2%, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in six patients (12.2%) during the neoadjuvant period, eight patients (17.0%) during the postoperative period, and seven patients (15.2%) during the adjuvant period. Biomarker analysis revealed that the pathological complete response showed no association with 2-year PFS and OS. Major pathological response showed a potentially strong association with improved 2-year PFS and OS rates. In addition, preoperative circulating tumor cells combined with pathological responses are helpful in prognosis assessment. In addition, our results showed that T downstaging, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and CD3+ T cells were independent factors that affect PFS. The signet ring cell component (SRCC), T downstaging, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent factors affecting OS. Prognostic nomograms of PFS and OS constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression results demonstrated suitable calibration and discrimination ability.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus SOX exhibits promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. In addition, our study established a prognostic risk signature and nomograms based on clinicopathological characteristics, which can accurately predict patient outcomes and aid in personalized treatment planning.

Combining immunotherapy and radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancers: A review

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

With a significant global impact, treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers still presents with challenges, despite current multimodality approaches in advanced stages. Clinical trials are expanding for checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiation therapy (RT). This review intends to offer a comprehensive image of the current data regarding the effectiveness of this association, and to reflect on possible directions to further optimize the results.

RESULTS

Several early phase studies demonstrated encouraging potential. However, translating preclinical outcomes to clinical settings proves challenging, especially in immunologically "cold" environments. GI cancers exhibit heterogeneity, requiring tailored approaches based on disease stage and patient characteristics. Current results, though promising, lack the power of evidence to influence the general practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding biomarkers for identifying or converting resistant cancers is essential for maximizing responses, moreover in this context strategic RT parameters need to be carefully considered. Our review emphasizes the significance of having a thorough grasp of how immunology, tumour biology, and treatment settings interact in order to propose novel research avenues and efficient GI cancer therapy.

Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.

Advances in Immunotherapy in Esophagogastric Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are rapidly transforming the care of patients with esophagogastric cancer. Particularly, anti-PD-1 therapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in metastatic and resectable disease. In this review, the authors discuss landmark clinical trials, highlight challenges and opportunities in this field, and propose potential directions for future work.

Association of pathological response with long-term survival outcomes after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors for resectable gastric/gastroesophageal cancer

Gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer represents a significant global health challenge. Radical surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for resectable G/GEJ cancer. Supported by robust evidence from multiple clinical studies, therapeutic approaches, including adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation, and perioperative chemotherapy, are generally recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence and enhance long-term survival outcomes post-surgery. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have altered the landscape of systemic treatment for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer, becoming the standard first-line therapy for specific patients. Consequently, exploring the efficacy of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting for resectable G/GEJ cancer is worthwhile. This review summarizes the current advances in the application of ICIs for resectable G/GEJ cancer.

Comprehensive multi-omics analysis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: Assessing response to neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy in a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant treatment for this condition has involved the exploration of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a potential approach. However, the efficacy remains uncertain.

METHODS

A single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with mFOLFOX6 and identify potential biomarkers of response through multi-omics analysis in patients with resectable locally advanced GC. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the R0 rate, near pCR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multi-omics analysis was assessed by whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) using biopsies pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

This study involved 60 patients, of which 55 underwent gastrectomy. Among these, five (9.1%) attained a pathological complete response (pCR), and 11 (20.0%) reached near pCR. No unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or perioperative mortality were observed, and the regimen presented a manageable safety profile. Molecular changes identified through multi-omics analysis correlated with treatment response, highlighting associations between HER2-positive and CTNNB1 mutations with treatment sensitivity and a favourable prognosis. This finding was further supported by immune cell infiltration analysis and mIF. Expression data uncovered a risk model with four genes (RALYL, SCGN, CCKBR, NTS) linked to poor response. Additionally, post-treatment infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes positively correlates with pathological response.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest the combination of PD-1-inhibitor and mFOLFOX6 showed efficacy and acceptable toxicity for locally advanced GC. Extended follow-up is required to determine the duration of the response. This study lays essential groundwork for developing precise neoadjuvant regimens.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes for resectable gastroesophageal junction cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has developed rapidly in patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). The suggested neoadjuvant treatment regimens for patients with GEJC may vary in light of the efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

A search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was completed to locate studies examining the safety and effectiveness of NAIT for resectable GEJC. We analyzed the effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in addition to subgroups and heterogeneity. Meta-analyses were performed using Stata BE17 software.

RESULTS

For these meta-analyses, 753 patients were chosen from 21 studies. The effectiveness of NAIT was assessed using the pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and nodal downstage to ypN0 rate. The MPR, pCR, and nodal downstage to ypN0 rate values in NAIT were noticeably higher (MPR: ES = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.36-0.54; pCR: ES = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.21-0.32; nodal downstage to ypN0 rate: ES = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.48-0.72) than those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (MPR < 30%; pCR: ES = 3%-17%; nodal downstage to ypN0 rate: ES = 21%-29%). Safety was assessed using the treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) incidence rate, surgical delay rate, surgical complications incidence rate, and surgical resection rate. In conclusion, the incidence of trAEs, incidence of surgical complications, and surgical delay rate had ES values of 0.66, 0.48, and 0.09, respectively. These rates were comparable to those from nCT or nCRT (95% CI: 0.60-0.70; 0.15-0.51; and 0, respectively). The reported resection rates of 85%-95% with nCT or nCRT were comparable to the mean surgical resection rate of 90%.

CONCLUSION

NAIT is an effective treatment for resectable GEJC; additionally, the level of NAIT toxicity is acceptable. The long-term effects of NAIT require further study.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Patients suffering from locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma often face a high postoperative recurrence rate. Despite aggressive treatment, less than 50% survive beyond five years. Ongoing clinical studies are exploring ways to prolong patient survival, revealing that perioperative chemotherapy can extend both the period of recurrence-free survival and overall survival for this group of patients. Currently, combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a critical treatment approach for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach in locally advanced patients remains unverified. This article delves into the latest research concerning the use of perioperative chemotherapy coupled with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treatment, and highlights prospective challenges and discusses how to best identify patients who may benefit from combined chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab plus LAG-3 inhibitor relatlimab in resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a phase Ib trial and ctDNA analyses

Gastroesophageal cancer dynamics and drivers of clinical responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remain poorly understood. Potential synergistic activity of dual programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibition may help improve immunotherapy responses for these tumors. We report a phase Ib trial that evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab (Arm A, n = 16) or nivolumab-relatlimab (Arm B, n = 16) in combination with chemoradiotherapy in 32 patients with resectable stage II/stage III gastroesophageal cancer together with an in-depth evaluation of pathological, molecular and functional immune responses. Primary endpoint was safety; the secondary endpoint was feasibility; exploratory endpoints included pathological complete (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study met its primary safety endpoint in Arm A, although Arm B required modification to mitigate toxicity. pCR and MPR rates were 40% and 53.5% for Arm A and 21.4% and 57.1% for Arm B. Most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia and dermatitis. Overall, 2-year RFS and OS rates were 72.5% and 82.6%, respectively. Higher baseline programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and LAG-3 expression were associated with deeper pathological responses. Exploratory analyses of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) showed that patients with undetectable ctDNA post-ICI induction, preoperatively and postoperatively had a significantly longer RFS and OS; ctDNA clearance was reflective of neoantigen-specific T cell responses. Our findings provide insights into the safety profile of combined PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade in gastroesophageal cancer and highlight the potential of ctDNA analysis to dynamically assess systemic tumor burden during neoadjuvant ICI that may open a therapeutic window for future intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03044613 .

Pathologic Complete Response After Gastric Artery Chemoembolization Combined With Tislelizumab for Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Case Report

Gastric cancer is the most common type of gastrointestinal cancer in China which about 80% of patients are locally advanced or advanced when diagnosed. Surgery along brings high recurrence rate for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), and neoadjuvant therapies are needed. The use of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor nowadays improved the disease-free survival for LAGC, however, only <35% of patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy nowadays. Therefore, new regimens are needed to be investigated. Gastric artery chemoembolization is applied to metastasis gastric cancer and researches showed interventional therapy can enhance the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibitor. Here, for the first time, we combined gastric artery chemoembolization with tislelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) for neoadjuvant therapy of a patient with LAGC. The patient achieved pCR after a D2 resection and tumor regression grade score was 1. After surgery, the patient received tislelizumab 200 mg per 3 weeks, and showed no sign of recurrence after 6 months of follow-up. The study indicated the use of tislelizumab and gastric artery chemoembolization for neoadjuvant therapy may bring a better pCR rate and prognosis of LAGC.

A prospective phase II clinical trial of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

To investigate the safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy (NCCT) and surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients diagnosed as locally advanced GC or Siewert II/III GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage T3-4 and/or N positive were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent NCRT (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent S-1, followed by NCCT (4 to 6 cycles of the SOX regimen) 2 to 4 weeks after NCRT. Gastric cancer radical resection with D2 lymph node dissection was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the total neoadjuvant therapy. The study was conducted from November 2019 to January 2023, enrolling a total of 46 patients. During the NCRT, all patients completed the treatment without dose reduction or delay. During the NCCT, 32 patients (69.6%) completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events in NCRT (5 cases) were non-hematological. During the course of NCCT, a notable occurrence of hematological toxicities was observed, with grade 3 or higher leukopenia (9.7%) and thrombocytopenia (12.2%) being experienced. A total of 28 patients (60.9%) underwent surgery, achieving R0 resection in all cases. A significant proportion of cases (71.4%) exhibited pathological downstaging to ypT0-2, while 10 patients (35.7%) demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR). The total neoadjuvant therapy comprising NCRT followed by NCCT and surgery demonstrates a low severe adverse reactions and promising efficacy, which could be considered as a viable treatment for locally advanced GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT04062058); the full date of first trial registration was 20/08/2019.

Deep learning on tertiary lymphoid structures in hematoxylin-eosin predicts cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) have been associated with favorable immunotherapy responses and prognosis in various cancers. Despite their significance, their quantification using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) staining of T and B lymphocytes remains labor-intensive, limiting its clinical utility. To address this challenge, we curated a dataset from matched mIHC and H&E whole-slide images (WSIs) and developed a deep learning model for automated segmentation of TLSs. The model achieved Dice coefficients of 0.91 on the internal test set and 0.866 on the external validation set, along with intersection over union (IoU) scores of 0.819 and 0.787, respectively. The TLS ratio, defined as the segmented TLS area over the total tissue area, correlated with B lymphocyte levels and the expression of CXCL13, a chemokine associated with TLS formation, in 6140 patients spanning 16 tumor types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The prognostic models for overall survival indicated that the inclusion of the TLS ratio with TNM staging significantly enhanced the models' discriminative ability, outperforming the traditional models that solely incorporated TNM staging, in 10 out of 15 TCGA tumor types. Furthermore, when applied to biopsied treatment-naïve tumor samples, higher TLS ratios predicted a positive immunotherapy response across multiple cohorts, including specific therapies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and stomach adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, our deep learning-based approach offers an automated and reproducible method for TLS segmentation and quantification, highlighting its potential in predicting immunotherapy response and informing cancer prognosis.

Camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma cancer: Results from a retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy during preoperative neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of clinical Stages II and III. The patients received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy regimen on Day 1 for up to three to four cycles (3 weeks per cycle). The probabilities of overall survival (OS) were 55.6% at 12 months and 35.6% at 18 months (45 patients). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.0% at 12 months and 63.3% at 18 months (30 patients). The median OS and DFS were not reached. The proportion of patients at postneoadjuvant pathological tumor stages ypT0, ypT2, and ypT3 were 10 (33.3%), 14 (46.7%), and 6 (20.0%), respectively, and those at stages ypN0 and ypN1 were 19 (63.3%) and 11 (36.7%), respectively. Additionally, the pathological complete response rate was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.154-0.512), and the major pathologic response rate was 46.7% (95% CI: 0.277-0.656). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in five patients (11.1%), with vomiting being the most common AE (three patients; 3.3%). Other common AEs of any grade included decreased lymphocyte count (48.9%), reactive capillary endothelial proliferation (46.7%), decreased white blood cell count (40.0%), anemia (31.1%), and vomiting (31.1%). The combination of camrelizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable safety.

Immunoneoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors of gastric cancer: an emerging exemplification : Immunoneoadjuvant therapy of gastric cancer

Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have enabled more effective treatment for individuals with various types of solid tumors. Given the improved survival benefit and acceptable safety profile of ICIs in advanced gastric cancer, there is plenty of interest in the use of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting with curative intent. Theoretically, immunoneoadjuvant with ICIs could boost the levels of endogenous tumor antigen present in the tumor to enhance T-cell priming and further enhance systemic immunity. This systemic immune response may improve the detection and elimination of the disseminated micrometastatic tumors beyond the resected tumor, which are sources of postsurgical relapse. Numerous clinical studies have begun to explore the application of ICIs in neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer. This article reviews the progress in the use of ICI monotherapy and in combination with alternative therapies for the treatment of gastric cancer to aid in the development of gastric cancer immunoneoadjuvant therapy and improve the overall therapeutic benefit.

Evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction tumors: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction tumors is progressing slowly. Although immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction tumors has made great progress, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally resectable gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction tumors have not been clearly demonstrated. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and advance the current research.

Methods

Original articles describing the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction tumors published up until October 15, 2023 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and other major databases. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for heterogeneity and subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 1074 patients from 33 studies were included. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy was mainly evaluated using pathological complete remission (PCR), major pathological remission (MPR), and tumor regression grade (TRG). Among the included patients, 1015 underwent surgical treatment and 847 achieved R0 resection. Of the patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, 24% (95% CI: 19%-28%) achieved PCR and 49% (95% CI: 38%-61%) achieved MPR. Safety was assessed by a surgical resection rate of 0.89 (95% CI: 85%-93%), incidence of ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of 28% (95% CI: 17%-40%), and incidence of ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of 19% (95% CI: 11%-27%).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, especially neoadjuvant dual-immunotherapy combinations, is effective and safe for resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction tumors in the short term. Nevertheless, further multicenter randomized trials are required to demonstrate which combination model is more beneficial.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=358752, identifier CRD42022358752.

Oncological outcomes of sequential laparoscopic gastrectomy after treatment with camrelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for gastric cancer with serosal invasion

Objective

To explore the oncological outcomes of sequential laparoscopic gastrectomy after treatment with camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for the treatment of gastric cancer with serosal invasion.

Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study and retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 128 patients with serosal invasion gastric cancer (cT4NxM0) who received nab-paclitaxel + S-1(SAP) or camrelizumab + nab-paclitaxel + S-1 (C-SAP) regimen and underwent laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy in Fujian Union Hospital from March 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into SAP group and C-SAP group. The 2-years overall survival rate, 2-year recurrence free survival rate recurrence rate and initial recurrence time were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included, including 90 cases in SAP group and 38 cases in C-SAP group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, gastrectomy method, surgical approach, R0 resection, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes and major pathologic response (MPR) rate between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the proportion of ypT0, ypN0 and pCR rate in C-SAP group were significantly higher than those in SAP group (P<0.05). The 2-year OS of C-SAP group (80.7%) was higher than that of SAP group (67.8%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.112); At 2 years after operation, the recurrence rate of C-SAP group (44.3%) was lower than that of SAP group (55.8%) (P = 0.097); Further analysis showed that the average time to recurrence in the C-SAP group was 18.9 months, which was longer than that in SAP group 13.1 months (P = 0.004); The 2-year recurrence free survival rate in C-SAP group was higher than that in SAP group (P=0.076); There was no significant difference in the overall survival time after recurrence between the two groups (P= 0.097).

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the proportion of ypT0, ypN0 and pCR in patients, while prolonging the initial recurrence time of patients in the C-SAP group, but did not increase the immunotherapy/chemotherapy related side effects and postoperative complications.

The Evolving Landscape of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer

Despite advances in treatment strategies and surgical approaches in recent years, improving survival outcomes in esophagogastric cancer (EGC) patients treated with curative intent remains a significant area of unmet need. The recent emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for resected EGC demonstrates the impact of immunotherapy in improving recurrence-free survival. Neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapies represent another promising approach with potential advantages over adjuvant therapy. Despite the promising results of early neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies, there are several challenges and future research needs. The optimal timing, duration and number of doses in relation to surgery and the optimal combination of immunotherapies are still unclear. In addition, rigorous correlative studies need to be performed to identify biomarkers for patient selection and treatment response prediction to maximize the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a concise summary of the current standard of care for resectable EGC and discuss the rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the pre-clinical and early clinical data of these novel therapies. Finally, we will examine the potential role and future direction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm and the perceived challenges and opportunities that lay ahead.

Comparative single-cell analysis reveals heterogeneous immune landscapes in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is a type of tumor that arises at the anatomical junction of the esophagus and stomach. Although AEG is commonly classified as a subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), the tumor microenvironment (TME) of AEG remains poorly understood. To address this issue, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on tumor and adjacent normal tissues from four AEG patients and performed integrated analysis with publicly available GAC single-cell datasets. Our study for the first time comprehensively deciphered the TME landscape of AEG, where heterogeneous AEG malignant cells were identified with diverse biological functions and intrinsic malignant nature. We also depicted transcriptional signatures and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires for T cell subclusters, revealing enhanced exhaustion and reduced clone expansion along the developmental trajectory of tumor-infiltrating T cells within AEG. Notably, we observed prominent enrichment of tumorigenic cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the AEG TME compared to GAC. These CAFs played a critical regulatory role in the intercellular communication network with other cell types in the AEG TME. Furthermore, we identified that the accumulation of CAFs in AEG might be induced by malignant cells through FGF-FGFR axes. Our findings provide a comprehensive depiction of the AEG TME, which underlies potential therapeutic targets for AEG patient treatment.

Association between pathologic response and survival after neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy improves event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (0% residual viable tumor (RVT) in primary tumor (PT) and lymph nodes (LNs)), and is approved for treatment of resectable lung cancer. Pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy is the potential analog to radiographic response for advanced disease. However, %RVT thresholds beyond pathologic complete response and major pathologic response (≤10% RVT) have not been explored. Pathologic response was prospectively assessed in the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial (NCT02998528), which evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab (anti-programmed death protein 1) plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable lung cancer. RVT, regression and necrosis were quantified (0-100%) in PT and LNs using a pan-tumor scoring system and tested for association with EFS in a prespecified exploratory analysis. Regardless of LN involvement, EFS improved with 0% versus >0% RVT-PT (hazard ratio = 0.18). RVT-PT predicted EFS for nivolumab plus chemotherapy (area under the curve = 0.74); 2-year EFS rates were 90%, 60%, 57% and 39% for patients with 0-5%, >5-30%, >30-80% and >80% RVT, respectively. Each 1% RVT associated with a 0.017 hazard ratio increase for EFS. Combining pathologic response from PT and LNs helped differentiate outcomes. When compared with radiographic response and circulating tumor DNA clearance, %RVT best approximated EFS. These findings support pathologic response as an emerging survival surrogate. Further assessment of the full spectrum of %RVT in lung cancer and other tumor types is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02998528 .

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with PD-1 antibodies

Background

Currently, the survival benefits of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody immunotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma remain controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that the survival benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma hinge upon the attainment of pathological complete response (pCR). Therefore, the prediction of pCR in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 antibody immunotherapy holds significant importance and is beneficial for the individualized treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Methods

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with GC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor (camrelizumab) therapy and radical gastrectomy between January 2019 and December 2020 at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 52 patients were enrolled in the study, with all subjects assigned to the training set. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of a combination of PD-1 inhibitor and fluorouracil analogues plus oxaliplatin, comprising two drugs. The patients were divided into a pCR group and a non-pCR group according to pCR occurrence. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the correlation between each factor and pCR. A prediction model was developed based on the results of the logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curves. Internal verification was completed via the bootstrapping method.

Results

The pCR was observed in 10 out of 52 patients (19.2%). The results of binary logistic regression multivariate analysis showed that cN stage [odds ratio (OR): 0.215; P=0.03], combined positive score (CPS) (OR: 6.364; P=0.026), and tumor diameter (OR: 0.112; P=0.026) were independent predictors of pCR. The nomogram prediction model for the pCR was plotted with a concordance index of 0.923 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8441-1].

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 antibodies may be the preferred option for patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who have a small tumor diameter, no or few lymph node metastases, and high CPS. The presented nomogram model exhibits the potential to predict pCR in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients, showcasing satisfactory predictive performance and potentially facilitating the implementation of personalized treatment strategies.

Making "cold" tumors "hot"- radiotherapy remodels the tumor immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer to benefit from immunotherapy: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have limited efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer due to the complex tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Studies have shown that radiotherapy can cause cell lesions to release tumor antigens and then take part in the remodeling of the tumor environment and the induction of ectopic effects via regional and systemic immunoregulation. Here, we reported a case of advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and a sharp shift of the TIME from T3 to T2 was also observed. One hepatic metastasis within the planning target volume (PTV) was evaluated complete response (CR), the other one was evaluated partial response (PR) and 2 hepatic metastases outside the PTV were surprisingly considered PR. In the study, we found that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy achieved significant therapeutic benefits, which may provide a new strategy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Association of systemic inflammatory markers and tertiary lymphoid structure with pathological complete response in gastric cancer patients receiving preoperative treatment: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of systemic and local immune responses is crucial in determining the efficacy of cancer interventions. The identification of specific factors that correlate with pathological complete response (pCR) is essential for optimizing treatment decisions.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 521 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative gastrectomy following preoperative treatment were reviewed. Of these patients, 463 did not achieve pCR (non-pCR) and 58 achieved pCR. Clinicopathological factors were evaluated to identify predictors for pCR using a logistic regression model. Additionally, a smaller cohort (n=76) was derived using propensity score matching to investigate local immune response, specifically the features of tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) using H&E staining, immunohistochemistry, and multiplex immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between low systemic inflammatory status and pCR, as evidenced by reduced levels of the combined systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (SII+NLR) (odds ratio: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.79-6.17, P<0.001). In the smaller cohort analysis, distinct TLS characteristics were correlated with the presence of pCR. Specifically, a higher density of TLS and a lower proportion of PD1+ cells and CD8+ cells within TLS in the tumor bed were strongly associated with pCR.

CONCLUSION

Both systemic and local immune profile were associated with pCR. A low level of SII+NLR served as an independent predictor of pCR, while distinct TLS features were associated with the presence of pCR. Focusing on the immune profile was crucial for optimal management of gastric cancer patients receiving preoperative treatment.

Research progress on the immune microenvironment and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

The tumor microenvironment, particularly the immune microenvironment, plays an indispensable role in the malignant progression and metastasis of gastric cancer (GC). As our understanding of the GC microenvironment continues to evolve, we are gaining deeper insights into the biological mechanisms at the single-cell level. This, in turn, has offered fresh perspectives on GC therapy. Encouragingly, there are various monotherapy and combination therapies in use, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell transfer therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and cancer vaccines. In this paper, we review the current research progress regarding the GC microenvironment and summarize promising immunotherapy research and targeted therapies.

Predictive Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Current Status and Emerging Prospects

Gastric cancer presents substantial management challenges, and the advent of immunotherapy has ignited renewed hope among patients. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, and adverse events associated with immunotherapy also occur on occasion, underscoring the imperative to identify suitable candidates for treatment. Several biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, mismatch repair status, Epstein-Barr Virus infection, circulating tumor DNA, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, have demonstrated potential in predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy in gastric cancer. However, the quest for the optimal predictive biomarker for gastric cancer immunotherapy remains challenging, as each biomarker carries its own limitations. Recently, multi-omics technologies have emerged as promising platforms for discovering novel biomarkers that may help in selecting gastric cancer patients likely to respond to immunotherapy. The identification of reliable predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in gastric cancer holds the promise of enhancing patient selection and improving treatment outcomes. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of clinically established biomarkers of immunotherapy in gastric cancer. Additionally, we introduce newly reported biomarkers based on multi-omics studies in the context of gastric cancer immunotherapy, thereby contributing to the ongoing efforts to refine patient stratification and treatment strategies.

Effect of two surgical approaches on the lung function and prognosis of patients with combined esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction has a center of origin within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction. Surgical resection remains the main treatment. A transthoracic approach is recommended for Siewert I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and a transabdominal approach is recommended for Siewert III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. However, there is a need to determine the optimal surgical approach for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to improve lung function and the prognosis of patients.

AIM

To investigate and compare the surgical effects, postoperative changes in pulmonary function, and prognoses of two approaches to treating combined esophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients with combined esophagogastric cancer treated by general and thoracic surgeries in our hospital were selected. They were divided into group A comprising 70 patients (transabdominal approach) and group B comprising 68 patients (transthoracic approach) based on the surgical approach. The indexes related to surgical trauma, number of removed lymph nodes, indexes of lung function before and after surgery, survival rate, and survival duration of the two groups were compared 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative drainage duration of the patients in group A were shorter than those of the patients in group B, and the volume of blood loss caused by surgery was lower for group A than for group B (P < 0.05). At the one-month postoperative review, the first second, maximum ventilation volume, forceful lung volume, and lung volume values were higher for group A than for group B (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, the QLQ-OES18 scale scores of the patients in group A were higher than those in group B on re-evaluation at 3 mo postoperatively (P < 0.05). The surgical complication rate of the patients in group A was 10.00%, which was lower than that of patients in group B, which was 23.53% (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches are comparable in treating combined esophagogastric cancer; however, the former results in lesser surgical trauma, milder changes in pulmonary function, and fewer complications.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib and camrelizumab for unresectable advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a single-arm, single-center, retrospective study

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Apatinib and Camrelizumab for treating unresectable advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer.

Material and methods

In this study, data of patients with unresectable advanced G/GEJ cancer who received TACE combined with Apatinib and Camrelizumab from August 2018 to December 2021 was evaluated. After TACE, patients were given intravenous Camrelizumab 200mg every three weeks and oral apatinib 250mg/day for treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 49 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up time was 14.0 months, and the median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI = 13.6-26.4). Two patients (4.08%) achieved complete remission, 28 patients (57.14%) achieved partial remission, 18 patients (36.73%) had stable disease, and 1 patient (2.04%) had disease progression. The ORR was 61.22%, and the DCR was 97.96%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age (HR 4.74, 95% CI = 1.674-13.440, P=0.003) and multiple distant metastases (HR 20.916, 95% CI = 4.094-106.808, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for OS. Most AEs were classified as grade 1-2, the most common being RCCEP (69.39%). There were 5 cases of grade 3-4 adverse events (10.20%). No patients discontinued or reduced the treatment dose due to AEs, and all patients received symptomatic treatment.

Conclusion

TACE combined with Apatinib and Camrelizumab is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with unresectable advanced G/GEJ cancer, which can significantly improve the median OS and ORR of patients. And the adverse events (AEs) are tolerable and manageable.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial

In this multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial (ChiCTR1900024428), patients with locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancers receive one cycle of sintilimab (anti-PD1) and chemotherapy (S-1 and nab-paclitaxel), followed by 5 weeks of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sintilimab, and another cycle of sintilimab and chemotherapy thereafter. Surgery is preferably scheduled within one to three weeks, and three cycles of adjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy are administrated. The primary endpoint is the pathological complete response. Our results meet the pre-specified primary endpoint. Thirteen of 34 (38.2%) enrolled patients achieve pathological complete response (95% CI: 22.2-56.4). The secondary objectives include disease-free survival (DFS), major pathological response, R0 resection rate, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and safety profile. The median DFS and EFS were 17.0 (95%CI: 11.1-20.9) and 21.1 (95%CI: 14.7-26.1) months, respectively, while the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 92.6% (95%CI: 50.1-99.5%). Seventeen patients (50.0%) have grade ≥3 adverse events during preoperative therapy. In prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis, CD3+ T cells, CD56+ NK cells, and the M1/M1 + M2-like macrophage infiltration at baseline are associated with pathological complete response. Here, we show the promising efficacy and manageable safety profile of sintilimab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the perioperative treatment of locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Promising New Standard of Care

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the treatment of various malignancies, with preclinical studies showing improved immune responses in the preoperative setting. FDA-approved neoadjuvant-immunotherapy-based approaches include triple-negative breast cancer and early non-small cell lung cancer on the basis of improvement in pathological response and event free survival. Nevertheless, current trials have only shown benefits in a fraction of patients. It is therefore crucial to identify predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection for such approaches. This review aims to provide an overview of potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. By the extrapolation of the metastatic setting, we explore known predictive biomarkers, i.e., PD-L1, mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden, as well as potential early-disease-specific biomarkers. We also discuss the challenges of identifying reliable biomarkers and the need for standardized protocols and guidelines for their validation and clinical implementation.

Current status and future perspectives for the treatment of resectable locally advanced esophagogastric junction cancer: A narrative review

Incidence rates for esophagogastric junction cancer are rising rapidly worldwide possibly due to the economic development and demographic changes. Therefore, increased attention has been paid to the prevention, diagnosis, and the treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer. Although there are discrepancies in the treatment strategy between Asian and Western countries, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer. Recent developments of perioperative multidisciplinary treatment may lead to better therapeutic effect, higher complete resection rate, and better control of the residual diseases, thus result in prolonged prognosis. In this review, we will focus on the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophagogastric junction cancer, and discuss the current status and future perspectives of the perioperative treatment including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy, as well as the surgical strategy. Better understanding of the latest treatment strategy and future overlook may enable to standardize and individualize the treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer, thus leading to better prognosis for those patients.

Impacts of neoadjuvant therapy on the number of dissected lymph nodes in esophagogastric junction cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy favors the prognosis of various cancers, including esophagogastric junction cancer (EGC). However, the impacts of neoadjuvant therapy on the number of dissected lymph nodes (LNs) have not yet been evaluated in EGC.

METHODS

We selected EGC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2006-2017). The optimal number of resected LNs was determined using X-tile software. Overall survival (OS) curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy significantly decreased the mean number of LN examination compared to the mean number of patients without neoadjuvant therapy (12.2 vs. 17.5, P = 0.003). The mean LN number of patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 16.3, which was also statistically lower than 17.5 (P = 0.001). In contrast, neoadjuvant chemotherapy caused a significant increase in the number of dissected LNs (21.0, P < 0.001). For patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the optimal cutoff value was 19. Patients with > 19 LNs had a better prognosis than those with 1-19 LNs (P < 0.05). For patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the optimal cutoff value was 9. Patients with  > 9 LNs had a better prognosis than those with 1-9 LNs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy decreased the number of dissected LNs, while neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased it in EGC patients. Hence, at least 10 LNs should be dissected for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 20 for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which could be applied in clinical practice.

Advances in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a group of drugs designed to improve the therapeutic effects on various types of malignant tumors. Irrespective of monotherapy or combinational therapies as first-line and later-line therapy, ICIs have achieved benefits for various tumors. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) / ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint that suppresses antitumor immunity, especially in the tumor microenvironment (TME). PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors block tumor-related downregulation of the immune system, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity. In comparison with traditional small-molecule drugs, ICIs exhibit pharmacokinetic characteristics owing to their high molecular weight. Furthermore, different types of ICIs exhibit different pharmacodynamic characteristics. Hence, ICIs have been approved for different indications by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). This review summarizes pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitors to provide a reference for rational clinical application.

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus routine neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the new strategy with routine neoadjuvant strategy, which included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Patients and methods

MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library were included. And, all of them were searched for eligible studies between January, 2000 and February, 2023. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were primary outcome of our study. The second outcome of interest was R0 resection rate. Odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators comparing the safety and efficiency of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the routine neoadjuvant therapy. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

Results

There were eight trials with 652 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The estimated pCR rate was higher in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group (OR =1.86; 95% CI, 1.25-2.75; I² = 32.8%, P=0.166). The different results were found in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) subgroups, the estimated OR was 2.35 (95%CI, 1.00-2.72; I² = 30.9%, P=0.215) in the EAC subgroup, and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.20-4.54; I² = 45.3%, P=0.161) in the ESCC subgroup, respectively. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy also showed the advantage in the MPR rates (OR =2.66; 95% CI, 1.69-4.19; I² = 24.3%, P=0.252). There was no obvious difference between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy with respect to surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate; while more treatment-related adverse events were observed for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy for pneumonitis/pneumonia (OR=3.46, 95% CI, 1.31-9.16; I² = 67.3%, P=0.005) and thyroid dysfunction (OR=4.69, 95% CI, 1.53-14.36; I² = 56.5%, P=0.032).

Conclusion

The pooled correlations indicated that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy (both nICT and nICRT) could significantly increase the rates of pCR and MPR, compared with routine neoadjuvant therapy (both nCT and nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced EC. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy were with acceptable toxicity. However, randomized studies with larger groups of patients need to performed to confirm these results.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020155802.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Background

Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy has been shown to improve prognosis in patients with untreated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥5. However, the available first-line treatment options for advanced GC are limited. Analysis of efficacy and safety of other programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies combined with chemotherapy may provide alternative treatment options.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic GC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who received either camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX)/capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) or SOX/CapOX alone between November 2020 and April 2022. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated.

Results

This study included 49 patients in camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group and 54 in chemotherapy group. The baseline clinical characteristics beyond Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status and PD-L1 CPS had no difference between combination group and chemotherapy group. ORR and DCR were significantly higher in combination therapy group than in chemotherapy group (59.18% vs. 38.89%, P=0.048; 83.67% vs. 62.96%, P=0.018). The median PFS in combination group was significantly longer than chemotherapy group [10.03 vs. 6.24 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.603, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.368-0.989, P=0.045]. The OS was not mature at the time of the OS analysis, with 40% patients died. Subgroup analyses showed that PFS was longer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 compared with CPS <1 and in patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <2.38 compared with ≥2.38. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were granulocytopenia (57% in combination group vs. 54% in chemotherapy group), anemia (39% vs. 33%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (39% vs. 33%, respectively). The proportion of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP, 73% vs. 0%) was higher in combination group relative to chemotherapy group; all were grades 1-2.

Conclusions

Among patients treated with camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy, the clinical outcomes were superior to those patients treated with chemotherapy. However, these promising findings need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.