Strong protective effect of the APOL1 p.N264K variant against G2-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and kidney disease

The APOL1 p.N264K variant is co-inherited with the G2 kidney disease risk variant through a proximity recombination event

Black Americans are 3-4 times more likely to develop nondiabetic kidney disease than other populations. Exclusively found in people of recent African (AFR) ancestry, risk variants in Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) termed G1 and G2 contribute significantly to this increased susceptibility. Our group and others showed that a missense variant in APOL1, rs73885316 (p.N264K, "M1"), is remarkably protective against APOL1 kidney disease when co-inherited with the G2 risk allele. Since the distance between the M1 and G2 variants is only 367 base pairs, we initially suspected that 2 independent mutation events occurred to create non-risk M1-G0 and M1-G2 haplotypes. Here, we examined APOL1 haplotypes in individuals of AFR ancestry from the 1000 Genomes Project, the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE), and an ancient individual from the Allen Ancient Genome Diversity Project to determine how the M1-G2 haplotype arose. We demonstrate that M1 most likely first appeared on a non-risk G0 haplotype, and that a subsequent recombination event bypassed strong recombination hotspots flanking APOL1 and occurred between p.N388Y389del on a G2 haplotype and M1 on a G0 haplotype to create the M1-G2 haplotype. Observing a recombination event within a small region between clinically relevant loci emphasizes the importance of studying the entire haplotype repertoire of a disease gene and the impact of haplotype backgrounds in disease susceptibility.

Platform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1 and their implications for kidney disease

Mutations in apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) are strongly associated with an increased risk of kidney disease in individuals of African ancestry, yet the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Plasma proteomics provides opportunities to elucidate mechanisms of disease by studying the effects of disease-associated variants on circulating protein levels. Here, we examine the genetic drivers of circulating APOL1 in individuals of African and European ancestry from four independent cohorts (UK Biobank, AASK, deCODE and Health ABC) employing three proteomic technologies (Olink, SomaLogic and mass spectrometry). We find that disease-associated APOL1 G1 and G2 variants are strong pQTLs for plasma APOL1 in Olink and SomaLogic, but the direction of their effects depends on the proteomic platform. We identify an additional APOL1 missense variant (rs2239785), common in Europeans, exhibiting the same platform-dependent directional discrepancy. Similarly, variants in the kallikrein-kinin pathway ( KLKB1 , F12 , KNG1 ) and their genetic interactions exhibit strong trans -pQTL effects for APOL1 measured by Olink, but not SomaLogic. To explain these discrepancies, we propose a model in which APOL1 mutations and the kallikrein-kinin pathway influence the relative abundance of two distinct APOL1 forms, corresponding to APOL1 bound to trypanolytic factors 1 and 2, which are differentially recognized by different proteomic platforms. We hypothesize that this shift in relative abundance of APOL1 forms may contribute to the development of kidney disease.

Evaluation for genetic disease in kidney transplant candidates: A practice resource

The increasing availability of clinically approved genetic tests for kidney disease has spurred the growth in the use of these tests in kidney transplant practice. Neither the testing options nor the patient population where this should be deployed has been defined, and its value in kidney transplant evaluation has not been demonstrated. Transplant providers may not always be aware of the limitations of genetic testing and may need guidance on comprehending test results and providing counsel, as many centers do not have easy access to a renal genetic counselor or a clinical geneticist. In this practice resource, a working group of nephrologists, geneticists, and a genetic counselor provide a pragmatic, tailored approach to genetic testing, advocating for its use only where the genetic diagnosis or its exclusion can impact the choices available for transplantation or posttransplant management or the workup of living donor candidates at increased risk for heritable disease.

Multiethnic prevalence of the APOL1 G1 and G2 variants among the Israeli dialysis population

Background and hypothesis

The two apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) variants, G1 and G2, are common in populations of sub-Saharan African ancestry. Individuals with two of these alleles (G1 or G2) have an increased risk for a spectrum of non-diabetic chronic kidney diseases. However, these variants are typically not observed outside of populations that self-identify as current continental Africans or having clear recent African ancestry such as, most notably, African Americans, and other large population groups in the Americas and several European countries. We hypothesized that the diverse ethnic groups within the Israeli population may exhibit varying levels of recent African ancestry. Therefore, it is plausible that APOL1 risk alleles might be present even in individuals who do not self-identify as being of sub-Saharan African descent.

Methods

We non-selectively screened people with kidney failure across Israel for APOL1 risk variants using restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Results

We recruited 1744 individuals from 38 dialysis units in Israel. We identified eight patients of Moroccan Jewish, Bedouin, or Muslim Arab ancestry, who carry at least one G1 or G2 allele. None of the eight patients carried the protective APOL1 p.N264K variant. Furthermore, despite all Bedouin individuals being G2 heterozygous, the G2 minor allele frequency was significantly enriched in kidney failure cases compared to ethnically matched controls (P = .006).

Conclusions

These findings show that APOL1 G1 and G2 allelic variants are present in populations previously not appreciated to possess recent sub-Saharan ancestry and suggest that a single G2 risk variant may confer increased risk for chronic kidney disease in certain population contexts.

APOL1 Bi- and Monoallelic Variants and Chronic Kidney Disease in West Africans

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants are risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) among Black Americans. Data are sparse on the genetic epidemiology of CKD and the clinical association of APOL1 variants with CKD in West Africans, a major group in the Black population.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study involving participants from Ghana and Nigeria who had CKD stages 2 through 5, biopsy-proven glomerular disease, or no kidney disease. We analyzed the association of CKD with APOL1 variants among participants with high-risk genotypes (two APOL1 risk alleles) and those with low-risk genotypes (fewer than two APOL1 risk alleles) by fitting logistic-regression models that controlled for covariates, including clinical site, age, and sex.

RESULTS

Among 8355 participants (4712 with CKD stages 2 through 5, 866 with glomerular diseases, and 2777 with no kidney disease), the prevalence of monoallelic APOL1 variants was 43.0% and that of biallelic APOL1 variants was 29.7%. Participants with two APOL1 risk alleles had higher odds of having CKD than those with one risk allele or no risk alleles (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.40), as well as higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.61). Participants with one APOL1 risk allele had higher odds of having CKD than those with no risk alleles (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.33), as well as higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.48). The inclusion of covariates did not modify the association of monoallelic and biallelic APOL1 variants with CKD or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, monoallelic APOL1 variants were associated with 18% higher odds of CKD and 61% higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; biallelic APOL1 variants were associated with 25% higher odds of CKD and 84% higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. (Funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and others.).

The Diagnostic Yield of Genomic Sequencing-Based Genetic Kidney Disease Testing in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Experience at an Urban US Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that approximately 10% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have disease-causing genetic variants, an observation relevant to evaluation of kidney transplant candidates.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in kidney transplant candidates evaluated at our program (January 1, 2021-December 8, 2022). Inclusion criteria were as follows: first-degree relative(s) with CKD/end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), early-onset CKD, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cystic kidney disease, alternative complement pathway-associated diseases, or ESKD of unknown cause.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients underwent genetic kidney disease testing. The most common indication for testing was early-onset CKD (34.2%), followed by a family history of CKD (23.4%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (18.0%), cystic kidney disease (9.0%), alternative complement pathway diseases (3.6%), and ESKD of unknown cause (11.7%). Overall diagnostic yield was 46.9% (52/111), and yield was highest among candidates with a family history of CKD (61.5%; 16/26). Among cases with positive testing, the most common diagnostic variant was APOL1, with 2 renal risk variants identified in 57.7% (30/52), while monogenic causes of CKD were identified in 42.3% (22/52). Genetic testing led to further evaluation or to a different diagnosis than the initial clinical diagnosis in 8.1% (9/111) of the cohort. For 24 transplant candidates, their identified diagnostic variants indicated the need for genetic testing of related living donor candidates; of these, 6 living donor candidates were evaluated and underwent testing, of whom donation was excluded in 1 candidate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant genetic testing increases understanding of CKD cause, and provides information for living donor evaluation and risk assessment of posttransplant disease recurrence.

Polygenic scores and their applications in kidney disease

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered thousands of risk variants that individually have small effects on the risk of human diseases, including chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, heart diseases and inflammatory disorders, but cumulatively explain a substantial fraction of disease risk, underscoring the complexity and pervasive polygenicity of common disorders. This complexity poses unique challenges to the clinical translation of GWAS findings. Polygenic scores combine small effects of individual GWAS risk variants across the genome to improve personalized risk prediction. Several polygenic scores have now been developed that exhibit sufficiently large effects to be considered clinically actionable. However, their clinical use is limited by their partial transferability across ancestries and a lack of validated models that combine polygenic, monogenic, family history and clinical risk factors. Moreover, prospective studies are still needed to demonstrate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of polygenic scores in clinical practice. Here, we discuss evolving methods for developing polygenic scores, best practices for validating and reporting their performance, and the study designs that will empower their clinical implementation. We specifically focus on the polygenic scores relevant to nephrology and other chronic, complex diseases and review their key limitations, necessary refinements and potential clinical applications.

Emerging role of genetics in kidney transplantation

The advent of more affordable genomic analytical pipelines has facilitated the expansion of genetic studies in kidney transplantation. Advances in genetic sequencing have allowed for a greater understanding of the genetic basis of chronic kidney disease, which has helped to guide transplant management and address issues related to living donation in specific disease settings. Recent efforts have shown significant effects of genetic ancestry and donor APOL1 risk genotypes in determining worse allograft outcomes and increased donation risks. Genetic studies in kidney transplantation outcomes have started to assess the effects of donor and recipient genetics in primary disease recurrence and transplant-related comorbidities, while genome-wide donor-recipient genetic incompatibilities have been shown to represent an important determinant of alloimmunity. Future large-scale comprehensive studies will shed light on the clinical utility of integrative genomics in the kidney transplantation setting.

Pathogenesis of HIV-associated nephropathy in children and adolescents: taking a hard look 40 years later in the era of gene-environment interactions

HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) is a kidney disease that affects mainly people of African ancestry with a high HIV-1 viral load. New antiretroviral therapies (ART) have been highly efficient in preventing and improving the outcome of HIVAN. However, providing chronic ART to children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) remains a significant challenge all over the world. More than 2.5 million CALWH, including those living in Sub-Saharan Africa, continue to be at high risk of developing HIVAN. Much of our understanding of the pathogenesis of HIVAN is based on studies conducted in transgenic mice and adults with HIVAN. However, CALWH may experience different health outcomes, risk factors, and susceptibilities to HIVAN in comparison to adults. This article reviews the progress made over the last 40 years in understanding the pathogenesis of HIVAN in CALWH, focusing on how the HIV virus, alongside genetic and environmental factors, contributes to the development of this disease. The landmark discovery that two risk alleles of the apolipoprotein-1 (APOL1) gene play a critical role in HIVAN has significantly advanced our understanding of the disease's pathogenesis. However, we still need to understand why renal inflammation persists despite ART and determine whether the kidney may harbor HIV reservoirs that need to be eliminated to cure HIV permanently. For these reasons, we emphasize reviewing how HIV-1 infects renal cells, affects their growth and regeneration, and discussing how inflammatory cytokines and APOL1 affect the outcome of childhood HIVAN.

Analysis of Glomerular Transcriptomes from Nephrotic Patients Suggest APOL1 Risk Variants Impact Parietal Epithelial Cells

The disproportionate risk for idiopathic proteinuric podocytopathies in Black people is explained, in part, by the presence of two risk alleles (G1 or G2) in the APOL1 gene. The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for this genetic association remain incompletely understood. We analyzed glomerular RNASeq transcriptomes from patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of which 72 had inferred African ancestry (AA) and 152 did not (noAA). Using gene coexpression networks we found a significant association between APOL1 risk allele number and the coexpression metamodule 2 (MM2), even after adjustment for eGFR and proteinuria at biopsy. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that unlike noAA, AA with the highest tertile of MM2 gene activation scores were less likely to achieve complete remission (p≤0.014). Characteristic direction (ChDir) identified a signature of 1481 genes, which separated patients with APOL1 risk alleles from those homozygous for reference APOL1 . Only in AA, the tertile with the highest activation scores of these 1481 genes was less likely to achieve complete remission (p≤0.022) and showed a trend to faster progression to the composite event of kidney failure or loss of 40% eGFR (p≤0.099). The MM2 and ChDir genes significantly overlapped and were both enriched for Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and inflammation terms. Finally, MM2 significantly overlapped with a parietal epithelial cell (PEC)-identity gene signature but not with a podocyte identity signature. Podocytes expressing variant APOL1s may generate inflammatory signals that activate PECs by paracrine mechanisms contributing to APOL1 nephropathy.

Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants

Introduction

Returning research-based genetic results (gRoR) to participants in nephrology research can improve care; however, the practice raises implementational questions and no established guidelines for this process currently exist. Nephrologists' views on this issue can inform the process but are understudied.

Methods

We developed a conceptual workflow for gRoR from literature and experience, covering aspects such as which results to return, how, and by whom. We surveyed US nephrologists to gauge their views on the workflow and anticipated barriers and collected participants' demographics, including professional backgrounds.

Results

A total of 201 adult and pediatric nephrologists completed the survey. Most of them agreed that all diagnostic kidney-related results (93%), secondary findings (80%), and kidney-related risk variants (83%) should be returned. No significant differences were found between adult and pediatric nephrologists' responses, except that 48% of adult nephrologists versus 26% of pediatric nephrologists supported returning polygenic risk scores (PRS) (P < 0.01). Seventy-nine percent wanted to know about research results before clinical confirmation. Most of them (63%) believed a genetic counselor should return clinically confirmed results. Key barriers included the cost of clinical validation (77%) and the unavailability of genetic counseling services (63%). Facilitators included educational resources on genetic kidney diseases (91%), a referral list of experts (89%), and clear clinical care guidelines (89%). We discuss findings' implications and provide "points to consider."

Conclusion

There is significant interest in gRoR among nephrologists; however, logistical and economic concerns need addressing. Identified facilitators can help large nephrology studies planning to return genetic results to participants.

Mechanisms of podocyte injury in genetic kidney disease

Glomerular diseases are a leading cause of chronic kidney disease worldwide. Both acquired and hereditary glomerulopathies frequently share a common final disease mechanism: disruption of the glomerular filtration barrier, podocyte injury, and ultimately podocyte death and detachment. Over 70 monogenic causes of proteinuric kidney disease have been identified, and most of these genes are highly expressed in podocytes, regulating key processes such as maintenance of the slit diaphragm, regulation of actin cytoskeleton remodeling, and modulation of downstream transcriptional pathways. Collectively, these are increasingly being referred to as hereditary "podocytopathies," in which podocyte injury is the central feature driving proteinuria and kidney dysfunction. In this review, we provide an overview of the monogenic podocytopathies and discuss the molecular mechanisms by which single-gene defects lead to podocyte injury and ultimately glomerulosclerosis. We review how advances in genomic technology and a better understanding of the cell biological basis of disease have led to the development of more targeted and personalized therapeutic strategies, including an overview of small molecule and gene therapy approaches.

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1): From Sleeping Sickness to Kidney Disease

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) is a membrane-interacting protein induced by inflammation, which confers human resistance to infection by African trypanosomes. APOL1 kills Trypanosoma brucei through induction of apoptotic-like parasite death, but two T. brucei clones acquired resistance to APOL1, allowing them to cause sleeping sickness. An APOL1 C-terminal sequence alteration, such as occurs in natural West African variants G1 and G2, restored human resistance to these clones. However, APOL1 unfolding induced by G1 or G2 mutations enhances protein hydrophobicity, resulting in kidney podocyte dysfunctions affecting renal filtration. The mechanism involved in these dysfunctions is debated. The ability of APOL1 to generate ion pores in trypanosome intracellular membranes or in synthetic membranes was provided as an explanation. However, transmembrane insertion of APOL1 strictly depends on acidic conditions, and podocyte cytopathology mainly results from secreted APOL1 activity on the plasma membrane, which occurs under non-acidic conditions. In this review, I argue that besides inactivation of APOL3 functions in membrane dynamics (fission and fusion), APOL1 variants induce inflammation-linked podocyte toxicity not through pore formation, but through plasma membrane disturbance resulting from increased interaction with cholesterol, which enhances cation channels activity. A natural mutation in the membrane-interacting domain (N264K) abrogates variant APOL1 toxicity at the expense of slightly increased sensitivity to trypanosomes, further illustrating the continuous mutual adaptation between host and parasite.

Design and Rationale of the Phase 2 Baricitinib Study in Apolipoprotein L1-Mediated Kidney Disease (JUSTICE)

Introduction

Individuals of recent West African ancestry develop focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and hypertension-attributed end-stage kidney disease (HTN-ESKD) at 4 times the rate of White Americans. Two protein-coding variants of the Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene, G1 and G2, explain 50% to 70% of the excess risk of HTN-ESKD and FSGS among this group. Increased expression of G1 and G2 in the kidney, mediated by Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling, drive pathogenesis of these kidney diseases. Baricitinib is an orally active inhibitor of JAK1/2 that blocks APOL1 synthesis. The Janus kinase-STAT Inhibition to Reduce APOL1-Associated Kidney Disease (JUSTICE) trial is evaluating the antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with APOL1-associated FSGS and HTN-attributed chronic kidney disease (HTN-CKD).

Methods

JUSTICE is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot phase 2 trial of baricitinib in patients with proteinuria, APOL1-associated FSGS or APOL1-associated HTN-CKD without diabetes. A total of 75 African American patients with APOL1-associated CKD, including 25 with FSGS and 50 with HTN-CKD, aged 18 to 70 years will be randomized 2:1 to daily treatment with baricitinib or placebo, respectively.

Results

The primary efficacy end point will be percent change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to end of month 6. The primary safety end point will be incidence of clinically significant decreases in hemoglobin of ≥ 1g/dl.

Conclusion

The phase 2 JUSTICE study will characterize the antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in patients with APOL1-associated FSGS and APOL1-associated HTN-CKD.

APOL1 High-Risk Genotype is Not Associated With New or Worsening of Proteinuria or Kidney Function Decline Following COVID-19 Vaccination

Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 infection increases systemic inflammatory cytokines which act as a second-hit driver of Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1)-mediated collapsing glomerulopathy. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination also increases cytokines. Recent reports of new glomerular disease in individuals with APOL1 high-risk genotype (HRG) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination raised the concern SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may also act as a second-hit driver of APOL1-mediated glomerulopathy.

Methods

We screened 1507 adults in the Duke's Measurement to Understand Reclassification of Disease of Cabarrus and Kannapolis (MURDOCK) registry and enrolled 105 eligible participants with available SARS-CoV-2 vaccination data, prevaccination and postvaccination serum creatinine, and urine protein measurements. Paired data were stratified by number of APOL1 risk alleles (RAs) and compared within groups using Wilcoxon signed rank test and across groups by analysis of variance.

Results

Among 105 participants, 30 (28.6%) had 2, 39 (37.1%) had 1, and 36 (34.3%) had 0 APOL1 RA. Most of the participants (94%) received at least 2 doses of vaccine. Most (98%) received the BNT162B2 (Pfizer) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. On average, the prevaccine and postvaccine laboratory samples were drawn 648 days apart. There were no detectable differences between pre- and post-serum creatinine or pre- and post-urine albumin creatinine ratio irrespective of the participants' APOL1 genotype. Finally, most participants with APOL1 RA had the most common haplotype (E150, I228, and K255) and lacked the recently described protective N264K haplotype.

Conclusion

In this observational study, APOL1 HRG is not associated with new or worsening of proteinuria or decline in kidney function following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Validation of this result in larger cohorts would further support the renal safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in individuals with APOL1 HRG.

Genetic Causes of Nephrotic Syndrome and Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

The field of nephrology has a long-standing interest in deciphering the genetic basis of nephrotic syndrome (NS), motivated by the mechanistic insights it provides in chronic kidney disease. The initial era of genetic studies solidified NS and the focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesion as podocyte disorders. The likelihood of identifying a single gene (called monogenic) cause is higher if certain factors are present such as positive family history. Obtaining a monogenic diagnosis enables reproductive counseling and screening of family members. Now, with a new era of genomic studies facilitated by technological advances and the emergence of large genetically characterized cohorts, more insights are apparent. This includes the phenotypic breadth associated with disease genes, as evidenced in Alport syndrome and congenital NS of the Finnish type. Moreover, the underlying genetic architecture is more complex than previously appreciated, as shown by genome-wide association studies, suggesting that variants in multiple genes collectively influence risk. Achieving molecularly informed diagnoses also holds substantial potential for personalizing medicine, including the development of targeted therapeutics. Illustrative examples include coenzyme Q10 for ADCK4-associated NS and inaxaplin, a small molecule that inhibits apolipoprotein L1 channel activity, though larger studies are required to confirm benefit.

APOL1 nephropathy - a population genetics success story

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More than a decade ago, apolipoprotein L1 ( APOL1 ) risk alleles designated G1 and G2, were discovered to be causally associated with markedly increased risk for progressive kidney disease in individuals of recent African ancestry. Gratifying progress has been made during the intervening years, extending to the development and clinical testing of genomically precise small molecule therapy accompanied by emergence of RNA medicine platforms and clinical testing within just over a decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the plethora of excellent prior review articles, we will focus on new findings regarding unresolved questions relating mechanism of cell injury with mode of inheritance, regulation and modulation of APOL1 activity, modifiers and triggers for APOL1 kidney risk penetrance, the pleiotropic spectrum of APOL1 related disease beyond the kidney - all within the context of relevance to therapeutic advances.

SUMMARY

Notwithstanding remaining controversies and uncertainties, promising genomically precise therapies targeted at APOL1 mRNA using antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), inhibitors of APOL1 expression, and small molecules that specifically bind and inhibit APOL1 cation flux are emerging, many already at the clinical trial stage. These therapies hold great promise for mitigating APOL1 kidney injury and possibly other systemic phenotypes as well. A challenge will be to develop guidelines for appropriate use in susceptible individuals who will derive the greatest benefit.

APOL1-mediated and Mendelian forms of "heretofore" idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy: lessons from Brazil

APOL1-mediated kidney diseases have forever changed nephrology and kidney transplantation. Neves et al. extend this field with analyses in admixed Brazilians with the most severe type of APOL1-mediated kidney disease, idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy. Causative gene variants were detected in 58.6% of patients; 80.5% had APOL1 high-risk genotypes, and 19.5% had causative Mendelian variants. Their work identifies the cause of previous idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy and provides opportunities to identify novel modifiers in severe APOL1-mediated kidney diseases that are relevant beyond Brazil.

APOL1-mediated monovalent cation transport contributes to APOL1-mediated podocytopathy in kidney disease

Two coding variants of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), called G1 and G2, explain much of the excess risk of kidney disease in African Americans. While various cytotoxic phenotypes have been reported in experimental models, the proximal mechanism by which G1 and G2 cause kidney disease is poorly understood. Here, we leveraged 3 experimental models and a recently reported small molecule blocker of APOL1 protein, VX-147, to identify the upstream mechanism of G1-induced cytotoxicity. In HEK293 cells, we demonstrated that G1-mediated Na+ import/K+ efflux triggered activation of GPCR/IP3-mediated calcium release from the ER, impaired mitochondrial ATP production, and impaired translation, which were all reversed by VX-147. In human urine-derived podocyte-like epithelial cells (HUPECs), we demonstrated that G1 caused cytotoxicity that was again reversible by VX-147. Finally, in podocytes isolated from APOL1 G1 transgenic mice, we showed that IFN-γ-mediated induction of G1 caused K+ efflux, activation of GPCR/IP3 signaling, and inhibition of translation, podocyte injury, and proteinuria, all reversed by VX-147. Together, these results establish APOL1-mediated Na+/K+ transport as the proximal driver of APOL1-mediated kidney disease.