Distinct value computations support rapid sequential decisions

A cognitive process model captures near-optimal confidence-guided waiting in rats

Rational decision-makers invest more time pursuing rewards they are more confident they will eventually receive. A series of studies have therefore used willingness to wait for delayed rewards as a proxy for decision confidence. However, interpretation of waiting behavior is limited because it is unclear how environmental statistics influence optimal waiting, and how sources of internal variability influence subjects' behavior. We trained rats to perform a confidence-guided waiting task, and derived expressions for optimal waiting that make relevant environmental statistics explicit, including travel time incurred traveling from one reward opportunity to another. We found that rats waited longer than fully optimal agents, but that their behavior was closely matched by optimal agents with travel times constrained to match their own. We developed a process model describing the decision to stop waiting as an accumulation to bound process, which allowed us to compare the effects of multiple sources of internal variability on waiting. Surprisingly, although mean wait times grew with confidence, variability did not, inconsistent with scalar invariant timing, and best explained by variability in the stopping bound. Our results describe a tractable process model that can capture the influence of environmental statistics and internal sources of variability on subjects' decision process during confidence-guided waiting.

Acetylcholine demixes heterogeneous dopamine signals for learning and moving

Midbrain dopamine neurons promote reinforcement learning and movement vigor. A major outstanding question is how dopamine-recipient neurons in the striatum parse these heterogeneous signals. Here we characterized dopamine and acetylcholine release in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) of rats performing a decision-making task. We found that dopamine acted as a reward prediction error (RPE), modulating behavior and DMS spiking on subsequent trials when coincident with pauses in cholinergic release. In contrast, at task events that elicited coincident bursts of acetylcholine and dopamine, dopamine preceded contralateral movements and predicted movement vigor without inducing plastic changes in DMS firing rates. Our findings provide a circuit-level mechanism by which cholinergic modulation allows the same dopamine signals to be used for either movement or learning depending on instantaneous behavioral context.

Mesolimbic dopamine encodes reward prediction errors independent of learning rates

Biological accounts of reinforcement learning posit that dopamine encodes reward prediction errors (RPEs), which are multiplied by a learning rate to update state or action values. These values are thought to be represented in synaptic weights in the striatum, and updated by dopamine-dependent plasticity, suggesting that dopamine release might reflect the product of the learning rate and RPE. Here, we leveraged the fact that animals learn faster in volatile environments to characterize dopamine encoding of learning rates. We trained rats on a task with semi-observable states offering different rewards, and rats adjusted how quickly they initiated trials across states using RPEs. Computational modeling and behavioral analyses showed that learning rates were higher following state transitions, and scaled with trial-by-trial changes in beliefs about hidden states, approximating normative Bayesian strategies. Notably, dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens encoded RPEs independent of learning rates, suggesting that dopamine-independent mechanisms instantiate dynamic learning rates.

Curriculum learning inspired by behavioral shaping trains neural networks to adopt animal-like decision making strategies

Recurrent neural networks (RNN) are ubiquitously used in neuroscience to capture both neural dynamics and behaviors of living systems. However, when it comes to complex cognitive tasks, traditional methods for training RNNs can fall short in capturing crucial aspects of animal behavior. To address this challenge, we take inspiration from a commonly used (though rarely appreciated) approach from the experimental neuroscientist's toolkit: behavioral shaping. Our solution leverages task compositionality and models the animal's relevant learning experiences prior to the task. Taking as target a temporal wagering task previously studied in rats, we designed a pretraining curriculum of simpler cognitive tasks that are prerequisites for performing it well. These pretraining tasks are not just simplified versions of the temporal wagering task, but reflect relevant sub-computations. We show that this approach is required for RNNs to adopt similar strategies as rats, including long-timescale inference of latent states, which conventional pretraining approaches fail to capture. Mechanistically, our pretraining supports the development of key dynamical systems features needed for implementing both inference and value-based decision making. Overall, our approach addresses a gap in neural network model training by incorporating inductive biases of animals, which is important when modeling complex behaviors that rely on computational abilities acquired from past experiences.

Estrogenic control of reward prediction errors and reinforcement learning

Gonadal hormones act throughout the brain 1 , and nearly all neuropsychiatric disorders vary in symptom severity with hormonal fluctuations over the reproductive cycle, gestation, and perimenopause 2-4 . Yet the mechanisms by which hormones influence mental and cognitive processes are unclear. Exogenous estrogenic hormones modulate dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) 5,6 , which instantiates reward prediction errors (RPEs) for reinforcement learning 7-16 . Here we show that endogenous estrogenic hormones enhance RPEs and sensitivity to previous rewards by regulating expression of dopamine reuptake proteins in the NAcc. We trained rats to perform a temporal wagering task with different reward states; rats adjusted how quickly they initiated trials across states, balancing effort against expected rewards. Dopamine release in the NAcc reflected RPEs that predicted and causally in-fluenced subsequent initiation times. When fertile, females more quickly adjusted their initiation times to match reward states due to enhanced dopaminergic RPEs in the NAcc. Proteomics revealed reduced expression of dopamine transporters in fertile stages of the reproductive cycle. Finally, genetic suppression of midbrain estrogen receptors eliminated hormonal modulation of behavior. Estrogenic hormones therefore control the rate of reinforcement learning by regulating RPEs via dopamine reuptake, providing a mechanism by which hormones influence neural dynamics for motivation and learning.