Outcome differences by sex in oncology clinical trials

Sex disparities in advanced non-small cell lung cancer survival: A Danish nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Historically, cancers often exhibit sexual dimorphism. However, following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies into routine clinical practice, the association of sex on patient and tumour characteristics, as well as survival remains largely unexplored in advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this observational study, we identified adults diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023, using Danish nationwide health registries and clinical databases. We compared females to males across demographic, social, socioeconomic, patient and tumour characteristics (including PDL-1 expression and driver mutations), treatments, and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis and initiation of the first line of treatment (LOT1). Cox proportional hazards regression was employed, adjusting for key covariates in the overall cohort and stratified by stage, histological subtype, PD-L1 expression level, and treatment type. Propensity score matching was conducted as a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Among 14,635 included individuals, males comprised 50 % (n = 7,322). Patient and tumour characteristics differed between sexes. The crude and adjusted female-to-male mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0·82 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0·79-0·85) and 0·84 (0·81-0·88) from diagnosis and 0·80 (0·76-0·84) and 0·80 (0·75-0·84) from initiation of LOT1. Median OS for females and males was 8·8 months (95 % CI 8·4-9·2) and 7·0 months (6·7-7·3) from diagnosis and 14·1 months (13·5-15·1) and 10·9 months (10·3-11·5) from initiation of LOT1. Stratified analyses revealed that across all strata, females consistently demonstrated either favourable or comparable outcomes compared to males.

CONCLUSIONS

This study increases our understanding of sex-based disparities in advanced NSCLC. Adjusted analyses addressing previously suggested explanations for sex disparities in survival still demonstrated a longer survival for females, indicating yet-unidentified sex differences with potential clinical implications. Our results underscore the critical role of acknowledging sex as a key variable in oncology trials, research, and clinical practice.

Are we ignoring sex differences in haematological malignancies? A call for improved reporting

There are clear sex-based differences in the incidence, risk factors and mortality of most haematologic malignancies (HM). Despite known differences in physiology, haematopoiesis, molecular profiles, drug pharmacokinetics, treatment-related toxicities and treatment experience, males and females receive standardized and identical treatment for most HMs. Previous published work has demonstrated disparities in female representation in cancer clinical trials and highlighted a paucity of information on differential treatment outcomes and toxicities by sex. We analysed references of 182 clinical trials which form the basis of recent treatment guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and found a minority (17/9.3%) did not report the sex distribution of trial participants. However, a majority (165/90.6%) did not report sex-disaggregated outcomes. Of those that did, 36.5% showed outcome differences by sex. Academic leadership by women in the assessed trials as well as in guidelines committees was disproportionately lower than their representation in the profession. We call on all clinical trials leaders, consortia and guideline builders to include sex-disaggregated data in their analyses, reporting these in a transparent manner (as per regulations mandating such reporting), and for investigators to assess whether aetiological factors differ by sex. These actions will enhance personalized prevention, therapy and follow-up.

Sex Differences in the Cancer Proteome

Proteins play a central role in cancer biology, as are the most common drug targets and biomarkers. Sex influences the proteome in many diseases, ranging from neurological to cardiovascular. In cancer, sex is associated with incidence, progression and therapeutic response, as well as characteristics of the tumour genome and transcriptome. The extent to which sex differences impact the cancer proteome remains largely unknown. To fill this gap, we quantified sex differences across 1,590 proteomes from eight cancer types, identifying 39 genes with sex-differential proteins abundance in adenocarcinomas of the lung and 15 genes in hepatocellular carcinomas, clear cell cancers of the kidney and adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. A subset of these protein differences could be rationalized by sex-differential copy number aberrations. Pathway analysis showed that sex-differential proteins in lung adenocarcinoma were enriched in MYC and E2F target pathways. These findings highlight the modest impact of sex on the cancer proteome, but the very limited power of existing proteomics cohorts for these analyses.

Hallmarks of artificial intelligence contributions to precision oncology

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into oncology promises to revolutionize cancer care. In this Review, we discuss ten AI hallmarks in precision oncology, organized into three groups: (1) cancer prevention and diagnosis, encompassing cancer screening, detection and profiling; (2) optimizing current treatments, including patient outcome prediction, treatment planning and monitoring, clinical trial design and matching, and developing response biomarkers; and (3) advancing new treatments by identifying treatment combinations, discovering cancer vulnerabilities and designing drugs. We also survey AI applications in interventional clinical trials and address key challenges to broader clinical adoption of AI: data quality and quantity, model accuracy, clinical relevance and patient benefit, proposing actionable solutions for each.

Personalization of Cancer Treatment: Exploring the Role of Chronotherapy in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy

In the era of precision medicine, mounting evidence suggests that the time of therapy administration, or chronotherapy, has a great impact on treatment outcomes. Chronotherapy involves planning treatment timing by considering circadian rhythms, which are 24 h oscillations in behavior and physiology driven by synchronized molecular clocks throughout the body. The value of chronotherapy in cancer treatment is currently under investigation, notably in the effects of treatment timing on efficacy and side effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is a promising cancer treatment. However, many patients still experience disease progression or need to stop the therapy early due to side effects. There is accumulating evidence that the time of day at which ICI therapy is administered can have a substantial effect on ICI efficacy. Thus, it is important to investigate the intersections of circadian rhythms, chronotherapy, and ICI efficacy. In this review, we provide a brief overview of circadian rhythms in the context of immunity and cancer. Additionally, we outline current applications of chronotherapy for cancer treatment. We synthesize the 29 studies conducted to date that examine the impact of time-of-day administration on the efficacy of ICI therapy, its associated side effects, and sex differences in both efficacy and side effects. We also discuss potential mechanisms underlying these observed results. Finally, we highlight the challenges in this area and future directions for research, including the potential for a chronotherapeutic personalized medicine approach that tailors the time of ICI administration to individual patients' circadian rhythms.

Sex Disparity in Cancer: Role of Autophagy and Estrogen Receptors

Autophagy, a cellular process essential for maintaining homeostasis, plays a fundamental role in recycling damaged components and in adapting to stress. The dysregulation of autophagy is implicated in numerous human diseases, including cancer, where it exhibits a dual role as both a suppressor and a promoter, depending on the context and the stage of tumor development. The significant sex differences observed in autophagic processes are determined by biological factors, such as genetic makeup and sex hormones. Estrogens, through their interaction with specific receptors, modulate autophagy and influence tumor progression, therapy resistance, and the immune response to tumors. In females, the escape from X inactivation and estrogen signaling may be responsible for the advantages, in terms of lower incidence and longer survival, observed in oncology. Women often show better responses to traditional chemotherapy, while men respond better to immunotherapy. The action of sex hormones on the immune system could contribute to these differences. However, women experience more severe adverse reactions to anticancer drugs. The estrogen/autophagy crosstalk-involved in multiple aspects of the tumor, i.e., development, progression and the response to therapy-deserves an in-depth study, as it could highlight sex-specific mechanisms useful for designing innovative and gender-tailored treatments from the perspective of precision medicine.

Influence of Sex in the Development of Liver Diseases

The liver is a sexually dimorphic organ. Sex differences in prevalence, progression, prognosis, and treatment prevail in most liver diseases, and the mechanism of how liver diseases act differently among male versus female patients has not been fully elucidated. Biological sex differences in normal physiology and disease arise principally from sex hormones and/or sex chromosomes. Sex hormones contribute to the development and progression of most liver diseases, with estrogen- and androgen-mediated signaling pathways mechanistically involved. In addition, genetic factors in sex chromosomes have recently been found to contribute to the sex disparity of many liver diseases, which might explain, to some extent, the difference in gene expression pattern, immune response, and xenobiotic metabolism between men and women. Although increasing evidence suggests that sex is one of the most important modulators of disease prevalence and outcomes, at present, basic and clinical studies have long been sex unbalanced, with female subjects underestimated. As such, this review focuses on sex disparities of liver diseases and summarizes the current understanding of sex-specific mechanisms, including sex hormones, sex chromosomes, etc. We anticipate that understanding sex-specific pathogenesis will aid in promoting personalized therapies for liver disease among male versus female patients.

Heterogeneity in Cancer

Cancer heterogeneity is a major challenge in oncology, complicating diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. The clinical heterogeneity of cancer, which leads to differential treatment outcomes between patients with histopathologically similar cancers, is attributable to molecular diversity manifesting through genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic, microenvironmental, and host biology differences. Heterogeneity is observed between patients, individual metastases, and within individual lesions. This review discusses clinical implications of heterogeneity, emphasizing need for personalized approaches to overcome challenges posed by cancer's diverse presentations. Understanding of emerging molecular diagnostic and analytical techniques can provide a view into the multidimensional complexity of cancer heterogeneity. With over 90% of cancer-related deaths associated with metastasis, we additionally explore the role heterogeneity plays in treatment resistance and recurrence of metastatic lesions. Molecular insights from next-generation sequencing, single-cell transcriptomics, liquid biopsy technology, and artificial intelligence will facilitate the development of combination therapy regimens that can potentially induce lasting and even curative treatment outcomes.

OncoSexome: the landscape of sex-based differences in oncologic diseases

The NIH policy on sex as biological variable (SABV) emphasized the importance of sex-based differences in precision oncology. Over 50% of clinically actionable oncology genes are sex-biased, indicating differences in drug efficacy. Research has identified sex differences in non-reproductive cancers, highlighting the need for comprehensive sex-based cancer data. We therefore developed OncoSexome, a multidimensional knowledge base describing sex-based differences in cancer (https://idrblab.org/OncoSexome/) across four key topics: antineoplastic drugs and responses (SDR), oncology-related biomarkers (SBM), risk factors (SRF) and microbial landscape (SML). SDR covers sex-based differences in 2051 anticancer drugs; SBM describes 12 551 sex-differential biomarkers; SRF illustrates 350 sex-dependent risk factors; SML demonstrates 1386 microbes with sex-differential abundances associated with cancer development. OncoSexome is unique in illuminating multifaceted influences of biological sex on cancer, providing both external and endogenous contributors to cancer development and describing sex-based differences for the broadest oncological classes. Given the increasing global research interest in sex-based differences, OncoSexome is expected to impact future precision oncology practices significantly.

Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Men are generally more susceptible to bacterial infections than women. Central venous catheters (CVCs), often used to administer systemic treatment in patients with cancer, are an important source of infection. However, little is known about sex-specific differences of CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to compare CRBSIs in men versus women in a large cohort of patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data were derived from the SECRECY registry including nonselected patients with centrally inserted non-tunneled internal jugular or subclavian vein CVCs in 10 hematology and oncology sites in Germany. Only CRBSIs classified as definite CRBSI (dCRBSI) or probable CRBSI were included, and the combination of both was summarized as dpCRBSI. CVCs were matched 1:1 for underlying disease, anatomic site of CVC insertion, type of CVC dressing, antimicrobial coated CVC, complicated CVC insertion, and CVC in situ time by propensity score matching (PSM). Endpoints were CRBSI rates and incidences in CVCs inserted in men versus women.

RESULTS

A total of 5,075 CVCs registered from March 2013 to March 2024 were included in the analysis, of which 3,024 comprise the PSM cohort. A total of 1,512 (50.0%) CVCs were inserted in men. Underlying diseases mainly were hematological malignancies (96.4%). While there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the dCRBSI rate (5.4% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.12) and the dCRBSI incidence (3.8 vs. 2.9/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.11), the rate of dpCRBSI (9.9% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and the dpCRBSI incidence (7.0 vs. 4.7/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in men versus women. The proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci as causative agent of both dCRBSI and dpCRBSI was higher in men than in women (58.8% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.07 and 61.5% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.002, respectively). A multivariable regression revealed neutropenia as an independent risk factor for dCRBSI and male sex as risk factor for dCRBSI and dpCRBSI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with hematological malignancies, men have a higher risk of CRBSI than women. This finding may be attributed to the high number of jugular vein-inserted CVCs, which in men may be associated with higher rates of skin colonization than in women. Special preventive measures such as earlier removal of CVCs in men may be studied in future.

INTRODUCTION

Men are generally more susceptible to bacterial infections than women. Central venous catheters (CVCs), often used to administer systemic treatment in patients with cancer, are an important source of infection. However, little is known about sex-specific differences of CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with cancer. This study aimed to compare CRBSIs in men versus women in a large cohort of patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data were derived from the SECRECY registry including nonselected patients with centrally inserted non-tunneled internal jugular or subclavian vein CVCs in 10 hematology and oncology sites in Germany. Only CRBSIs classified as definite CRBSI (dCRBSI) or probable CRBSI were included, and the combination of both was summarized as dpCRBSI. CVCs were matched 1:1 for underlying disease, anatomic site of CVC insertion, type of CVC dressing, antimicrobial coated CVC, complicated CVC insertion, and CVC in situ time by propensity score matching (PSM). Endpoints were CRBSI rates and incidences in CVCs inserted in men versus women.

RESULTS

A total of 5,075 CVCs registered from March 2013 to March 2024 were included in the analysis, of which 3,024 comprise the PSM cohort. A total of 1,512 (50.0%) CVCs were inserted in men. Underlying diseases mainly were hematological malignancies (96.4%). While there was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the dCRBSI rate (5.4% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.12) and the dCRBSI incidence (3.8 vs. 2.9/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.11), the rate of dpCRBSI (9.9% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and the dpCRBSI incidence (7.0 vs. 4.7/1,000 CVC days; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in men versus women. The proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci as causative agent of both dCRBSI and dpCRBSI was higher in men than in women (58.8% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.07 and 61.5% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.002, respectively). A multivariable regression revealed neutropenia as an independent risk factor for dCRBSI and male sex as risk factor for dCRBSI and dpCRBSI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with hematological malignancies, men have a higher risk of CRBSI than women. This finding may be attributed to the high number of jugular vein-inserted CVCs, which in men may be associated with higher rates of skin colonization than in women. Special preventive measures such as earlier removal of CVCs in men may be studied in future.

The impact of sex/gender-specific funding and editorial policies on biomedical research outcomes: a cross-national analysis (2000-2021)

Reflecting sex and gender characteristics in biomedical research is critical to improving health outcomes and reducing adverse effects from medical treatments. This study investigates the impact of sex/gender-specific funding policies and journal editorial standards on the integration of sex/gender analysis in biomedical research publications. Using data from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and other countries between 2000 and 2021, we assessed how these policies influenced research output in the fields of medicine and life sciences. Our findings show that countries with progressive funding policies and journals promoting sex/gender-based reporting have significantly improved research quality and publication rates. This highlights the importance of coordinated policy efforts and editorial practices in advancing integrated sex/gender research. We recommend continued global efforts from policymakers, funding bodies, and journals to embed sex/gender perspectives in scientific inquiry, ensuring more effective and equitable biomedical advancements.

Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trials of Diet Intervention Reports and Their Impact on Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of diet on cancer have been short term (<1 year), mostly evaluating breast cancer survivors. Given the many-year interval that is generally required for an intervention to have an impact on cancer risk or prognosis, as well as the fact that lifestyle strategies such as diet modification frequently fail due to lack of adherence over the long term, we focused this systematic review only on longer-term (≥1 year) intervention reports. Diet intervention reports focused on reducing cancer risk in overweight and obese individuals target caloric restriction (every day, some days, or most hours of each day).

METHODS

This study is a systematic review of RCTs lasting at least 1 year, testing dietary interventions with a primary or secondary endpoint of cancer or a biomarker linked to cancer.

RESULTS

Fifty-one reports met our review criteria. Twenty of fifty-one (39%) reports are RCTs where the primary endpoint was cancer or a cancer-related biomarker, while the other reports evaluated reports where cancer or a cancer-related biomarker was a secondary endpoint. Thirteen of twenty (65%) primary reports evaluated isocaloric, and the remaining eight evaluated low-calorie diets. All but one of the primary and two secondary isocaloric diet reports evaluated the benefit of a low-fat diet (LFD), with the other three evaluating a Mediterranean diet (MedD). More LCD vs. isocaloric diet primary reports (71% vs. 38%) demonstrated cancer or cancer-related biomarker benefit; the difference in chance of benefit with secondary reports was 85% for LCD vs. 73% for isocaloric diets. Three of three MedD reports demonstrated benefit. Sixty-nine percent (20/29) of the secondary reports came from two large reports: the WHI diet modification trial (15 secondary reports) and the polyp prevention trial (5 secondary reports). Nineteen of twenty-two (86%) primary reports enrolled only women, and three enrolled both men and women. No study that met our criteria enrolled only men, comprising 1447 men in total vs. 62,054 women. Fifteen of twenty (75%) primary reports focus on healthy women or women with breast cancer. Adherence findings are discussed when provided.

CONCLUSIONS

More long-term RCTs evaluating cancer and cancer-related biomarker endpoints are needed, especially for cancers at sites other than the breast.

Difference in Body Composition Patterns between Age Groups in Italian Individuals with Overweight and Obesity: When BMI Becomes a Misleading Tool in Nutritional Settings

Little is known about the changes in body composition (BC) in people with overweight or obesity. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in BC patterns in this population based on gender and age. A total of 2844 Italian adults of mixed gender and a body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 underwent a BC assessment by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The sample was categorized into three age groups: 'young' (20-39 years), 'middle' (40-59 years), and 'older' (60-80 years) adults, after being matched by body weight and BMI. Males showed higher total body fat percentage (BF%) and a lower total lean mass (LM), progressively from the young to the middle to the older age groups, while females showed similar values for these total compartments between the three age groups. However, in both genders, participants in the middle and older groups were more likely to have a higher trunk fat percentage by +1.23% to +4.21%, and lower appendicular lean mass (ALM) by -0.81 kg to -2.63 kg with respect to the young group, indicating expression of major central adiposity and sarcopenia. While our findings underscore the limitations of BMI to detect these differences between age groups, the identification of new tools suitable for this aim is greatly needed in this population. Moreover, further investigation that clarifies the impact of these differences in BC patterns between gender and age groups on health outcomes is also required.