Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021

Efficacy of risankizumab across subgroups in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc integrated analysis of the phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 and KEEPsAKE 2 randomized controlled trials

In the KEEPsAKE 1 (NCT03675308) and KEEPsAKE 2 (NCT03671148) phase 3 trials, risankizumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post hoc integrated analysis evaluated achieving the following efficacy outcomes at weeks 24 and 52 by baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, minimal disease activity status, Low Disease Activity status (Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis), and minimal clinically important difference in pain. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between risankizumab (n = 707) and placebo (n = 700) groups. Numerically higher ACR20 response rates at week 24 (primary endpoint) were observed among the risankizumab (46.3%-60.1%) vs. placebo (15.5%-36.2%) cohorts, regardless of subgroups. At week 52, consistent proportions of patients randomized to risankizumab achieved ACR20 (48.6%-75.8%) while those initially randomized to placebo and switched to risankizumab experienced an improvement from week 24 (43.7%-63.9%), regardless of subgroups. Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures assessing rigorous skin response criteria, composite measures of overall disease activity, and PsA-related symptoms. Risankizumab treatment was efficacious among patients with varying demographic and psoriatic disease characteristics through 52 weeks.

Hypertension and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular (CV) complications in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (IAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite recent improvements in the management of IAD, patients with IAD still have an increased CV mortality and CV complications, mostly related to CV risk factors such as hypertension and inflammation. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE libraries for controlled studies involving hypertension and CV complications in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Sjogren's syndrome (SS), or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) between January 2000 and March 2022. We extracted data on the prevalence of hypertension and CV complications. Then, random-effects meta-analyses and exploratory multivariate meta-regression were performed to explore factors related to the prevalence of hypertension. Of 2726 studies screened, 122 were selected for the meta-analysis. The prevalence of hypertension was higher among patients with IAD than controls, with an overall unadjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of 1.67 [1.58-1.76] and an adjusted OR of 1.36 [1.24-1.50]. All diseases were found to be associated with increased risk of hypertension: SLE, adjusted OR 3.40 [1.93-6.00]; psoriasis, OR 1.32 [1.16-1.51]; PsA, OR 1.49 [1.15-1.94]; RA, OR 1.28 [1.04-1.58]; SS, OR 2.02 [1.19-3.44]. Age and female sex were significantly associated with hypertension in patients with IAD. The risk of CV complications was increased: ischemic heart disease, adjusted OR 1.38 [1.21-1.57]; cerebrovascular disease, OR 1.37 [1.03-1.81]; heart failure, OR 1.28 [1.05-1.55]; atherosclerotic plaques presence, OR 2.46 [1.84-3.29]. The prevalence of hypertension and CV complications is higher among patients with IAD. Screening and management of hypertension appears to be of paramount importance in these patients.

Liquiritin exerts psoriasis therapy and prevention by regulating the YY1/RBP3 axis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis (PSO) poses a global health threat. The current research challenge in PSO is relapse. Liquiritin (LIQ), a major active compound from Glycyrrhiza inflata Batalin, has multiple pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms underlying LIQ's therapeutic actions in PSO and prevention abilities remain elusive.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to delve into the potential to treat and prevent PSO and the mechanism of LIQ.

METHODS

The anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects of LIQ were studied in vitro with the HaCaT cell line. Then, Transcriptional analysis and bioinformatic analysis were used to determine the internal associations of the target set. Subsequently, functional experiment, luciferase report assay, ChIP-PCR, and immunohistochemical validation of clinical samples were performed to investigate the mechanism of LIQ. Finally, the anti-psoriatic effects and prevention abilities of LIQ were verified in vivo with imiquimod (IMQ)-induced PSO-like mouse models.

RESULTS

Here, we identified differentially expressed genes in LIQ-stimulated HaCaT cells and Retinol-Binding Protein 3 (RBP3) as the core target, whereas YY1 was a predicted upstream transcription factor of RBP3. The YY1/RBP3 axis was obviously altered after administering LIQ at optimal doses of 20 μM in vitro and 100 µg/ml in vivo. LIQ can significantly inhibit the progression of PSO in vivo. Notably, LIQ also prevented the relapse of psoriatic lesions induced by the second round of low-dose IMQ. Mechanistically, we observed that LIQ could increase the promotion of YY1 for RBP3 by enhancing the binding affinity between them.

CONCLUSION

These findings revealed that the YY1/RBP3 axis is a potential psoriatic target, and LIQ is a promising and innovative therapeutic candidate for the treatment and prevention of PSO.

Psoriatic arthritis with psychological comorbidities: an overview of systematic reviews on incidence, prevalence, and geographic disparities

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis evaluating the prevalence, incidence, and psychological comorbidities of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are increasing, so it's time to perform an overview of systematic reviews. To summarize the pooled prevalence, incidence, and psychological comorbidities rates of PsA, and to explore possible continent disparities. In this overview of systematic reviews the CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched to October 25, 2023. This overview included systematic reviews with meta-analysis of people with PsA, providing the pooled prevalence or incidence rates of PsA in general, or clinical populations and/or psychological comorbidities. The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement was followed. AMSTAR-2 assessed the quality of reviews. The degree of overlap was calculated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Maps were developed using the location of where primary studies were conducted using DataWrapper App. The protocol was prospectively registered with Open Science Framework registry. Pooled prevalence and incidence rates of PsA or its associated psychological comorbidities in general or specific populations. We also collected locations from the primary studies of the included meta-analyses. Only the assessment of prevalence rates of PsA in people with psoriasis showed slight overlap (CCA = 3.3%). Items 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 13 were poorly reported in AMSTAR-2. The pooled prevalence of PsA ranged from 0.13 to 0.15% in the general population, and 15.5% to 19.7% in people with psoriasis. The pooled incidence of PsA ranged from 8.26 to 9.27 cases per 100,000 inhabitants to 0.87 cases in individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa. The pooled prevalence of psychological comorbidities was 11.9-20% for depression, 19-33% anxiety, 38% alexithymia, and 72.9% in poor sleep quality. Only the pooled incidence of depression was assessed with 21.3 per 1000-person year. PsA seems to be prevalent and incident not only in people with psoriasis, but also in general population. Depression and anxiety symptoms may be present in some patients with PsA. Finally, continent disparities exist, and methodological and clinical issues were found, which could be helpful in the future agenda of the epidemiology of PsA.

Paradoxical psoriasis induced by IL-17 inhibitors: a case series of patients with axial spondyloarthritis and a systematic literature review

Following the market authorization of interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, a growing number of cases of IL-17 inhibitor-induced paradoxical psoriasis (PsO) have been reported. Our objectives were to present two cases of IL-17 inhibitor-induced paradoxical PsO and to systematically review the literature for similar cases, summarizing and presenting the relevant data. A systematic literature review of previously presented cases of paradoxical PsO induced by IL-17 inhibitors was conducted. We presented two patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and paradoxical PsO induced by secukinumab (SEC). One patient's psoriatic lesions responded well to adjuvant topical treatment, while the other patient required a combination of topical treatment and cyclosporine Α for successful treatment. SEC was continued in both cases. We also identified 35 patients with IL-17 inhibitor-induced paradoxical PsO in the literature review. The most frequent types of paradoxical PsO were palmoplantar pustular and plaque PsO, while the median latency period was 11 weeks. Approximately one-third of patients continued IL-17 inhibitor treatment with adjunctive therapy, primarily topical, which produced satisfactory results in most patients. Almost two-thirds of the patients discontinued the IL-17 inhibitor, with the majority of patients switching to another biological agent with a different mechanism of action or initiating other systemic antipsoriatic treatments, resulting in mainly satisfactory outcomes. Therefore, paradoxical PsO induced by IL-17 inhibitors appears to respond well in both patients who continue IL-17 inhibitors with adjunctive treatment and those who discontinue IL-17 inhibitors while switching to a different class of biological agent or initiating other systemic antipsoriatic treatments.

Persistent Patient-Level Effect of Guselkumab at Consecutive 8-Week Dosing Visits and Over Time in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of a 2-Year, Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

Group-level analyses from the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 trial of guselkumab demonstrated robust and durable improvements across psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. To specifically evaluate continuous disease control in individual patients, persistence of clinically relevant improvements was assessed, both at consecutive guselkumab dosing visits and over time.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses included biologic-naïve patients randomized to 100 mg of guselkumab at week 0, week 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W). Improvements in joint (minimal clinically important improvement [MCII] in Disease Activity Index for PsA [DAPSA; ≥7.25], clinical DAPSA [cDAPSA; ≥5.7]), skin (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1), and overall disease activity (patient global assessment of arthritis and psoriasis [PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis; MCII ≥ 15 mm], PsA Disease Activity Score [PASDAS; MCII ≥ 0.8]) were assessed. Proportions of patients with maintenance of DAPSA and cDAPSA MCII at consecutive Q8W guselkumab dosing visits (ie, at weeks 4 and 12, weeks 12 and 20, etc through week 52) and patient-level durability of response through week 100 (Kaplan-Meier) were determined.

RESULTS

Among 248 patients randomized to guselkumab Q8W, 93% to 99% maintained clinical improvement in joint disease at consecutive Q8W dosing visits through week 52 across time periods. Among guselkumab patients achieving MCII by week 24, estimated probabilities of maintenance of clinical improvement 100 weeks post achievement ranged from 68% (IGA 0/1) to 89% (PASDAS MCII). Median times to loss of improvement were not reached; estimated mean weeks of maintenance of improvement were 58.6, 52.4, 75.7, 83.6, and 76.7, respectively, for DAPSA, cDAPSA, IGA, PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis, and PASDAS.

CONCLUSION

Guselkumab provided highly durable patient-level improvements, both at consecutive Q8W dosing visits for joint disease activity and over time across PsA domains according to physician- and patient-driven assessments.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

INTRODUCTION

The relative efficacy of bimekizumab and risankizumab in patients with PsA who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or with previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR) was assessed at 52 weeks (Wk52) using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC).

METHODS

Relevant trials were systematically identified. For patients who were bDMARD naïve, individual patient data (IPD) from BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) were matched with summary data from KEEPsAKE-1 (NCT03675308; N = 483). For patients who were TNFi-IR, IPD from BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data from the TNFi-IR patient subgroup in KEEPsAKE-2 (NCT03671148; N = 106). To adjust for cross-trial differences, patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted to match the baseline characteristics of patients in the risankizumab trials. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Recalculated bimekizumab Wk52 outcomes for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA) index (non-responder imputation) were compared with risankizumab outcomes via non-placebo-adjusted comparisons.

RESULTS

In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a significantly greater likelihood of response than risankizumab at Wk52 for ACR50 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.52 [1.11, 2.09]) and ACR70 (1.80 [1.29, 2.51]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a significantly greater likelihood of response than risankizumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (1.78 [1.08, 2.96]), ACR50 (3.05 [1.74, 5.32]), ACR70 (3.69 [1.82, 7.46]), and MDA (2.43 [1.37, 4.32]).

CONCLUSIONS

Using MAIC, bimekizumab demonstrated a greater likelihood of efficacy in most ACR and MDA outcomes than risankizumab in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT03675308, NCT03671148.

GRAPPA Point-Counterpoint: Should Biologics Be Used for Mild Psoriasis?

Psoriasis (PsO) is commonly classified as mild, moderate, or severe, usually based on body surface area (BSA) or other validated measures. Although most dermatologists agree that mild PsO should be treated with topical therapies, there are circumstances where mild or limited PsO should be treated with biologics, even as first line. A debate about use of topical vs biologic therapy was presented at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting. Arguments in favor of using biologics when patients have mild disease on limited BSA included presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and symptoms on special sites (ie, scalp, face, body folds, genitals, nails, palms, soles). New data suggest that treating limited or early PsO may decrease the risk of developing PsA. Arguments against using biologics for mild PsO focused on the definition of mild PsO, citing that limited BSA with PsA and significant quality of life impact should not be defined as mild. Truly mild PsO should be treated with topical agents, given their safety and relative low cost. The availability of newer agents like roflumilast and tapinarof have expanded therapeutic choice and have data supporting their use for treatment of special sites.

Minimally invasive interventional procedures for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

a literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) were included. The results were organized according to the treated anatomical site: knee, hip, foot and ankle, shoulder, hand and wrist, sacroiliac joints. Data about treatment efficacy were extracted. The main outcome was change in pain intensity using the 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 1 month. Additional timepoints at 3, 6 and 12 months were assessed. Change in functional status was evaluated. Pooled estimates were calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval relative to baseline. The meta-analyses of RCTs and NRSI were conducted separately.

RESULTS

of the 4599 retrieved articles, 164 were included in the review and, considering all the established timepoints, 111 (38 RCTs and 73 NRSI) were selected for the meta-analysis. Only one article described patients with inflammatory arthritis. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, one month after the procedure, MD in VAS was -3.98 (-4.41 to -3.55; k = 21) for knee RFA, and -3.18 (-3.96 to -2.39; k = 8) for sacroiliac joints RFA. In the meta-analysis of NRSI, MD in VAS was -4.12 (-4.63 to -3.61; k = 23) for knee RFA, -3.84 (-4.77 to -2.92; k = 7) for knee TAE, -4.34 (-4.96 to -3.71; k = 2) for hip RFA, -3.83 (-4.52 to -3.15; k = 3) for shoulder RFA and -4.93 (-5.58 to -4.28; k = 14) for sacroiliac joints RFA. Significant decrease in pain intensity was found also at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, functional status improved at all the assessed timepoints.

CONCLUSION

minimally invasive interventional procedures can improve pain and functional status of patients affected by OA or chronic sacroiliac pain of degenerative origin. Further research is warranted in the field of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

INTRODUCTION

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess the relative efficacy at 52 weeks (Wk52) of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or who had a previous inadequate response or an intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).

METHODS

Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from the bimekizumab trials BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data on patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 1 trial (NCT01009086; 45 mg, N = 205; 90 mg; N = 204) and a subgroup of TNFi-IR patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 2 trial (NCT01077362; 45 mg, N = 60; 90 mg, N = 58), respectively. Patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of the ustekinumab trial patients. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Non-placebo-adjusted comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and ustekinumab outcomes for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria (non-responder imputation) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 45 mg: 2.14 [1.35, 3.40]; 90 mg: 1.98 [1.24, 3.16]), ACR50 (45 mg: 2.74 [1.75, 4.29]; 90 mg: 2.29 [1.48, 3.55]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 3.33 [2.04, 5.46]; 90 mg: 3.05 [1.89, 4.91]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (45 mg: 4.17 [2.13, 8.16]; 90 mg: 4.19 [2.07, 8.49]), ACR50 (45 mg: 5.00 [2.26, 11.05]; 90 mg: 3.86 [1.70, 8.79]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 9.85 [2.79, 34.79]; 90 mg: 6.29 [1.98, 20.04]).

CONCLUSIONS

Using MAIC, bimekizumab showed greater efficacy than ustekinumab in achieving all ACR responses in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT01009086, NCT01077362.

Spinal Lesions in Axial Psoriatic Disease: How Should They Be Identified and Quantified by Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Proper assessment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) requires assessment of all disease domains, including axial disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the method of choice for evaluating axial involvement in PsA. When assessing patients with PsA for spinal involvement, it is important to assess both vertebral body lesions and posterolateral lesions, such as inflammation in facet joints and costovertebral joints, and enthesitis at spinous and transverse processes. The Canada-Denmark (CanDen) assessment system for spine MRIs is the preferred method for detailed evaluation of inflammation and structural damage at various anatomical locations in the spine, and it is reproducible and sensitive to change. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) has recently published MRI definitions of inflammatory and structural lesions in the spine, incorporating the CanDen definitions of spinal lesions on MRI. Applying the ASAS definitions and the CanDen assessment system in clinical practice and trials is recommended. Ongoing research/studies, not least the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study, may provide a data-driven definition of axial involvement in PsA. Ongoing research is expected to further improve and validate assessment tools for axial PsA and to provide a much-needed data-driven consensus-based definition of axial involvement in PsA.

Microneedle transdermal drug delivery as a candidate for the treatment of gouty arthritis: Material structure, design strategies and prospects

Gouty arthritis (GA) is caused by monosodium urate (MSU) crystals deposition. GA is difficult to cure because of its complex disease mechanism and the tendency to reoccur. GA patients require long-term uric acid-lowering and anti-inflammatory treatments. In the past ten years, as a painless, convenient and well-tolerated new drug transdermal delivery method, microneedles (MNs) administration has been continuously developed, which can realize various drug release modes to deal with various complex diseases. Compared with the traditional administration methods (oral and injection), MNs are more conducive to the long-term independent treatment of GA patients because of their safe, efficient and controllable drug delivery ability. In this review, the pathological mechanism of GA and common therapeutic drugs for GA are summarized. After that, MNs drug delivery mechanisms were summarized: dissolution release mechanism, swelling release mechanism and channel-assisted release mechanism. According to drug delivery patterns of MNs, the mechanisms and applications of rapid-release MNs, long-acting MNs, intelligent-release MNs and multiple-release MNs were reviewed. Additionally, existing problems and future trends of MNs in the treatment of GA were also discussed. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Gout is an arthritis caused by metabolic disease "hyperuricemia". Epidemiological studies show that the number of gouty patients is increasing rapidly worldwide. Due to the complex disease mechanism and recurrent nature of gout, gouty patients require long-term therapy. However, traditional drug delivery modes (oral and injectable) have poor adherence, low drug utilization, and lack of local localized targeting. They may lead to adverse effects such as rashes and gastrointestinal reactions. As a painless, convenient and well-tolerated new drug transdermal delivery method, microneedles have been continuously developed, which can realize various drug release modes to deal with gouty arthritis. In this review, the material structure, design strategy and future outlook of microneedles for treating gouty arthritis will be reviewed.

Hot Topics: Depression in Individuals With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are associated with an increased risk of mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. People with psoriatic disease (PsD) are also more likely to die by suicide than those without. Mood disorders affect people with PsD in a multitude of ways, such as in effectiveness of care, response to treatment, remission rates, and quality of life. Although the links between PsD and mental health conditions have not been fully elucidated, this review will highlight recent studies investigating shared biologic mechanisms between depression and PsD. Since mental health disorders can be assessed and treated effectively, dermatologists and rheumatologists should be aware of the mental health burden in individuals with PsD to accomplish the following: (1) educate their patients with PsD about this association, (2) screen for mental health conditions on an ongoing basis in their clinical practice, (3) refer their patients with PsD to a mental health professional when needed, and (4) ensure selection of a safe PsD treatment in the setting of comorbid mental health disease. Finally, important treatment considerations for individuals with PsD and depression are reviewed. This topic was presented at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Celebrates Its 20th Anniversary

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) started in August 2003 with 40 initial participants and celebrated its 20th anniversary with 1036 members, many of whom attended the annual meeting in Dublin, Ireland, on July 15 to 17, 2023. GRAPPA arose from a need experienced by psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PsO) investigators to meet to address questions related to psoriatic disease (PsD). Though other groups were meeting at the time to classify and discuss PsA, GRAPPA arose from a desire to include international clinical and investigational researchers of both dermatology and rheumatology. The organization has built awareness of PsO and PsA, developed and validated research assessment tools to measure clinical status and disease outcomes, published multiple treatment recommendations, supported basic and clinical research on PsD pathophysiology, fostered interactions across research fields, and educated the future generation of PsO and PsA researchers. The group continues to focus on major priorities affecting patients with PsD and will continue evolving in the next decades.

How to Involve Patients in GRAPPA Research as Partners

Patient research partners (PRPs) have been actively participating in the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) annual meetings, working groups, and research activities since 2013. As they have evolved, the PRPs operate as a cohesive group supported by their GRAPPA-approved handbook and policy documents. The number of involved PRPs has increased, allowing more opportunity for the incorporation of the patient voice and experience in GRAPPA activities. In the GRAPPA proceedings, PRPs regularly report on their involvement in the meetings and research projects. During a 30-minute plenary session at the GRAPPA 2023 annual meeting, attendees were informed about the evolving roles of PRPs in GRAPPA and beyond and were asked to provide feedback on their experience and opinions regarding PRP involvement in psoriatic disease research. Here we report the key messages of the session, including polling results, examples of PRP involvement, and ongoing challenges.

GRAPPA 2023 Patient Research Partner (PRP) Network Update: Enhancing PRP Involvement Within GRAPPA

Nine patient research partners (PRPs) attended the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting in person in Dublin, Ireland. The importance of close relations between researchers, clinicians, and PRPs was highlighted at the PRP premeeting, with discussion regarding PRP engagement within GRAPPA with the GRAPPA leadership team. A presentation was given by PRPs at the plenary session, and there was continued active engagement of PRPs in breakout sessions, workshops, and plenary sessions compared to previous annual meetings. The GRAPPA PRP Network is committed to supporting the GRAPPA mission and contributing the unique perspectives of dedicated, knowledgeable individuals with the lived experience of psoriatic disease. This report provides a summary of the GRAPPA PRP Network meetings at the GRAPPA 2023 annual meeting and the continued commitment of the GRAPPA PRP Network to enhance PRP involvement within GRAPPA activities.

Four-year effectiveness, safety and drug retention rate of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis: a real-life Italian multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate over a 48-month follow-up period the: 1) long-term effectiveness and safety; 2) drug retention rate (DRR); 3) impact of comorbidities and bDMARDs line on MDA and DAPSA remission/low disease activity (LDA) of secukinumab in a multicenter Italian cohort of PsA patients.

METHODS

Consecutive PsA patients receiving secukinumab were followed prospectively in Italian centers between 2016 and 2023. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were recorded. Treatment response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and every year up to 48 months (T48). DRR was assessed according to clinical and demographic features, comorbidities and bDMARDs line. Adverse events (AE) were recorded.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-five patients [42.5% male] were enrolled; 32.9% naïve received secukinumab; 74.2% had ≥ 1 comorbidity. Overall, secukinumab yielded improved outcomes at T48: naïve maintained lower disease activity vs. non-naïve [DAPSA 4.0 (1.4-8.1) vs. 6.0 (2.2-10.4);p = 0.04]; 76.9% naïve and 66.2% non-naïve achieved MDA; MDA no comorbidities vs. 1-3 comorbidities 78.8% vs. 73.3% (p < 0.05), and MDA no comorbidities vs. > 3 comorbidities 78.8% vs. 48.7% (p < 0.001). DAPSA-REM and DAPSA-LDA rates were higher in naïve patients, albeit similar between those without comorbidities vs. 1-3 comorbidities, and slightly lower in those with > 3 comorbidities. Treatment was discontinued in 233 patients due to loss of effectiveness, and in 41 due to AE. The overall DRR at T48 was 66%, with differences according to bDMARDs line (p < 0.001), use of combined csDMARDs (p = 0.016), BMI (p = 0.037) and mono/oligoarthritis vs. polyarthritis (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab proved safe and effective, and patients achieved sustained remission with a notable drug retention rate at 4 years.

Guselkumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis in Russia: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DISCOVER-1 and -2 Randomized Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on the use of advanced therapies to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Russia. Guselkumab, an interleukin (IL)-23p19-subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in patients with PsA in the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and -2, and COSMOS trials. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with PsA in Russia.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of DISCOVER-1 and -2 included 1002 biologic-naïve patients with active PsA from Russia (n = 317) and the rest of the world (RoW; n = 685). Patients received guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), or at week 0 and 4 then Q8W, or placebo then guselkumab Q4W at week 24 (Russian: n = 119, 88, and 110, respectively; RoW: n = 216, 246, and 223, respectively). Outcomes through week 52 were pooled (DISCOVER-1 and -2); outcomes from week 52 to 100 represent DISCOVER-2 only.

RESULTS

In patients from Russia, ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria response rates were higher with guselkumab vs. placebo at week 24, increased through week 52, and were consistent across all guselkumab-treated groups at week 100. Similar trends were generally observed for ACR50, ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90), achievement of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) low disease activity/remission and minimal disease activity, enthesitis and dactylitis resolution, ≥ 0.35 improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, improvement in patient-reported pain, and measures in patients with axial PsA (including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS], and patient-reported spinal pain). Efficacy responses were similar between patients from Russia and the RoW across all endpoints and timepoints. The safety profile of guselkumab in patients from Russia was consistent with previous findings.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrated that the safety and efficacy profiles of guselkumab across all PsA domains and patient-reported outcomes in patients from Russia were similar to those in patients from the RoW.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03162796 and NCT03158285.

Comparative early effectiveness across 14 PsA drugs and 5 classes of PsA treatment: 3-month results from the PRO-SPIRIT study

BACKGROUND

The psoriatic arthritis (PsA) Observational Study of Persistence of Treatment (PRO-SPIRIT) assesses effectiveness and persistence of real-world PsA treatments. Ixekizumab (IXE) is an interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor (i) (IL-17Ai), approved for the treatment of adult PsA.

METHODS

The aim of this predefined interim analysis was to report baseline characteristics along with early (3-month) descriptive and comparative real-world effectiveness in patients with PsA prescribed with advanced treatment including IL-17Ai; IXE or secukinumab (SEC), IL-12/23i, IL-23i, tumour necrosis factor (TNFi) or Janus kinase (JAKi).

RESULTS

1192 patients across 6 countries were analysed. At baseline, patients receiving IXE had longer disease duration and higher previous biological/targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs experience than patients starting TNFi and SEC 150, and less concomitant conventional-synthetic DMARD use than TNFi and JAKi. Comparative analyses at 3 months showed that: (a) versus TNFi, IXE exhibited similar improvement in clinical Disease Activity in PsA (cDAPSA) but significantly greater improvement in body surface area affected by psoriasis (BSA) and global assessments (physician GA, patient GA (PatGA)); (b) versus IL-12/23i and IL-23i (pooled), IXE showed significantly greater improvement in cDAPSA and PatGA; (c) IXE was as fast as JAKi in improving joint disease activity. Ad hoc analysis indicated that more patients with active psoriasis (BSA ≥3%) achieved minimal disease activity with IXE than JAKi or IL-12/23i. The responses to SEC varied by dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the rapid 3-month effectiveness of IXE on joint disease activity-as fast as TNFi and JAKi (cDAPSA), and exceeding IL-12/23i and IL-23i-along with clear benefits to skin.

Is Total Joint Arthroplasty an Effective and Safe Option for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients? A Scoping Review

Recent advancements in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have improved patient outcomes, but many still experience disease progression, potentially leading to joint replacement surgery. In this scoping review, we examine the relationship between PsA and orthopedic surgery, focusing on the risks and temporal trends of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the prevalence of postoperative complications, and the effectiveness of these procedures in PsA. The included studies suggest that PsA patients have an overall higher risk of undergoing THA and TKA compared to the general population, but with temporal trends showing a decreased risk for patients diagnosed in recent years. Acute complications, such as renal failure, stroke, and postoperative infections, may be more common in PsA patients than in those with osteoarthritis after THA and TKA. No significant differences were found in pain, function, or satisfaction between PsA, skin psoriasis, and osteoarthritis patients after THA. A key conclusion from our review is the need to strengthen the collaboration between rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons, as interdisciplinary evaluation is crucial for improving the outcomes of PsA patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Development of a questionnaire to assess the patient perspective regarding challenges in psoriatic arthritis treatment-a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment in lower-income regions, particularly from the patient perspective. This study explores the challenges faced by socioeconomically vulnerable PsA patients and the reasons for non-adherence to treatment guidelines. The main objective of the study is to develop a questionnaire to identify the primary challenges in PsA treatment adherence and to analyze its feasibility while simultaneously understanding the target population's unique characteristics.

METHODS

We included PsA patients meeting the Classification Criteria for PsA (CASPAR), excluding those with other overlapping inflammatory diseases. The study, supported by two patient-research partners, began with focus groups to identify treatment challenges, leading to the creation of a 26-item questionnaire. Its reliability was verified using the test-retest method, targeting a percent agreement ≥ 0.8. Then, PsA patients at a rheumatology clinic completed the final survey.

RESULTS

The study involved 69 PsA patients. The final questionnaire contained 26-questions across five-domains, with a 92.2% agreement rate and an average completion time of 8.3 minutes. Diagnostic delays exceeded a year for 59% of patients and more than two years for 33%. Daily life disruptions affected 43.2% of patients, with 35.3% taking sick leave or retiring. Around 25% waited over 8 weeks for drug approval, and 17.6% required legal intervention to access medication. Drug dispensation issues impacted about 60% of patients. Furthermore, 66.7% lived far from their rheumatologist, with 49% traveling over an hour for appointments. Approximately 30% were unaware of the risks of methotrexatein relation to alcohol consumption and pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire was feasible and reliable, with its results underscoring patient-centric challenges in PsA management, particularly concerning diagnostic delays and medication access, as well as daily life disruptions and misinformation. These findings emphasize the urgency for healthcare reforms aimed at improving diagnosis efficiency, patient education, and streamlined medication access, emphasizing the need for tailored initiatives to improve the healthcare experience for PsA patients.

Treatment of early oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis with apremilast: primary outcomes at week 16 from the FOREMOST randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is frequent but rarely studied. The objective was to assess the efficacy of apremilast in early oligoarticular PsA.

METHODS

FOREMOST (NCT03747939) was a phase 4 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients had early (symptom duration ≤5 years) oligoarticular PsA (>1 but ≤4 swollen and >1 but ≤4 tender joints; 2-8 total active joints). Patients were randomised 2:1 to apremilast 30 mg two times per day or placebo for 24 weeks, with an early escape at week 16. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients at week 16 who achieved minimal disease activity (MDA)-Joints (modification of MDA mandating ≤1 swollen joint and ≤1 tender joint) based on sentinel joints (those affected at baseline) with a combination of non-responder imputation and multiple imputations. Exploratory analysis assessed all joints.

RESULTS

Of 308 patients randomised (apremilast: n=203; placebo: n=105), mean (SD) PsA duration was 9.9 (10.2) months, mean (SD) age was 50.9 (12.5) years and 39.9% of patients were using a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. MDA-Joints (sentinel joints (primary endpoint) and all joints) were achieved by significantly more patients with apremilast (33.9% and 21.3%) vs placebo (16.0% and 7.9%) at week 16 (p=0.0008 and nominal p=0.0028, respectively). Greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes, clinical disease activity and skin involvement were also seen with apremilast versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

FOREMOST is the first randomised controlled trial designed for early oligoarticular PsA and showed apremilast improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes. This trial may inform the optimal management of PsA in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03747939.

Cardiovascular comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis: state of the art

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex multi-system immune-mediated condition, characterised by a high comorbidity burden, one of the most prevalent of which is cardiovascular disease (CVD), affecting up to 80% of patients. This narrative review explores the current understanding of cardiovascular comorbidities in PsA, focusing on mechanistic pathways, risk assessment, and the impact of treatment choices on cardiovascular health. Here, we outline the role of inflammatory cytokines, immune system dysregulation, and genetic predispositions in PsA, not only as drivers of musculoskeletal manifestations but also atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, giving rise to cardiovascular pathology. Given these insights, accurately assessing and predicting cardiovascular risk in PsA patients is a critical challenge. This review evaluates traditional risk calculators as well as innovative biomarkers and imaging techniques, emphasising their utility and limitations in capturing the true cardiovascular risk profile of PsA patients. There are multiple complexities surrounding the treatment of PsA in the context of concurrent CVD, and therapeutic choices must carefully balance efficacy in managing PsA symptoms with the potential cardiovascular implications. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating dermatological, rheumatological, and cardiological perspectives, amongst others, to optimise patient outcomes, is key. Overall, a heightened clinical awareness and research focus on cardiovascular comorbidities in PsA is warranted, aiming to refine risk assessment strategies and therapeutic interventions that holistically address the multifaceted needs of patients with PsA.

Treatment strategies for Spondyloarthritis: Implementation of precision medicine - Or "one size fits all" concept?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a term to describe a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have common pathophysiological, genetic, and clinical features. Under the umbrella term SpA, two main groups are subsumed: axial SpA (radiographic axSpA and non-radiographic axSpA) and peripheral SpA (with the leading representative being psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but also arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated pSpA). The key clinical symptom in axSpA is chronic back pain, typically with inflammatory characteristics, which starts in early adulthood, while the leading clinical manifestations of peripheral SpA (pSpA) are arthritis, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis. Furthermore, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD) can accompany axial or peripheral symptoms. All these factors need to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in SpA patients. Despite the major advances in the treatment landscape over the past two decades with the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and most recently targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), a relevant proportion of patients still does not achieve the desired state of remission (=absence of disease activity). With this implementation of new treatment modalities, clinicians now have more choices to make in the treatment algorithms. However, despite generalized treatment recommendations, all factors need to be carefully considered when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice, aiming at an important first step towards personalized treatment strategies in SpA. In this narrative review, we focus on the efficacy of approved and emerging treatment options in axSpA and PsA as the main representative of pSpA and discuss their selective effect on the different manifestations associated with SpA to provide guidance on drivers of treatment decisions in specific situations.

Comparison of Real-World On-Label Treatment Persistence in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Guselkumab Versus Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Treatment persistence among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is essential for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. Guselkumab, a fully human interleukin-23p19-subunit inhibitor, was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of active PsA in July 2020, with a dosing regimen of 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks. In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies of patients with active PsA, 94% of guselkumab-randomized patients completed treatment through 1 year and 90% did so through 2 years (DISCOVER-2). Real-world evidence is needed to compare treatment persistence while following US prescribing guidelines (i.e., on-label persistence) for guselkumab versus subcutaneous (SC) tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis).

METHODS

Adults with PsA receiving guselkumab or their first SC TNFi (i.e., adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or golimumab) between 14 July 2020 and 31 March 2022 were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (first claim defined the treatment start date [index date]). Baseline characteristics and biologic use (biologic-naïve/biologic-experienced) were assessed during the 12-month period preceding the index date. Baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts using propensity-score weighting based on the standardized mortality ratio approach. The follow-up period spanned from the index date until the earlier of the end of continuous insurance eligibility or end of data availability. On-label persistence, defined as the absence of treatment discontinuation (based on a gap of 112 days for guselkumab or 56 days for SC TNFi) or any dose escalation/reduction during follow-up, was assessed in the weighted treatment cohorts using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. A Cox proportional hazards model, further adjusted for baseline biologic use, was used to compare on-label persistence between the weighted cohorts.

RESULTS

The guselkumab cohort included 526 patients (mean age 49.8 years; 61.2% female) and the SC TNFi cohort included 1953 patients (mean age: 48.5 years; 60.2% female). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced with a mean follow-up of 12.3-12.4 months across cohorts; 51.5% of patients in the guselkumab cohort and 16.7% in the SC TNFi cohort received biologics in the 12-month baseline period. Respective rates of treatment persistence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 91.2%, 84.1%, 75.9%, and 71.5% for the guselkumab cohort versus 77.3%, 61.6%, 50.0%, and 43.7% for the SC TNFi cohort (all log-rank p < 0.001). At 12 months, patients in the guselkumab cohort were 3.0 times more likely than patients in the SC TNFi cohort to remain persistent on treatment (p < 0.001). Median time to discontinuation was not reached for the guselkumab cohort and was 8.9 months for the SC TNFi cohort.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study employing US commercial health-plan claims data to assess on-label treatment persistence in PsA demonstrated that, at 12 months, guselkumab was associated with a 3 times greater likelihood of persistence compared with SC TNFi.

[Epidemiological data and medical care situation of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases in Germany : Real-world evidence on prevalence, disease combinations, care]

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory diseases (immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, IMID) can overlap or occur simultaneously due to clinical similarities. The resulting utilization of heathcare structures has not yet been investigated across disciplines but is of potential importance for optimizing the treatment of patients with IMID.

AIM OF THE WORK

Analysis of epidemiological data including utilization of care services in patients with selected IMIDs: psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and connective tissue disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis based on health insurances accounting data with a sample of approximately 4 million insured persons, the prevalence of the abovementioned IMID and the frequency of IMID combinations were analyzed based on documented diagnoses (ICD-10 GM). The frequency of hospitalizations and utilization of outpatient physician contacts was recorded in predefined specialist disciplines (general medicine, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology) and compared with an age-adjusted and gender-adjusted reference population.

RESULTS

A total of 188,440 patients had at least 1 of the IMID diagnoses analyzed (4.7%), with an age peak of 61-70 years. The highest prevalence was observed for psoriasis (1.85%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (1.38%). Combinations with at least one other IMID were relatively common (29%), with this being most common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (82.9%, of which 68.2% had psoriasis), followed by ankylosing spondylitis (27.5%) and Crohn's disease (21.6%). Compared to the reference population, patients with IMID were hospitalized more often and more frequently utilized the outpatient disciplines.

DISCUSSION

The study results describe that IMIDs occur in combination and that the patients make comparatively more use of care structures of different disciplines. A multidisciplinary approach could increase the efficiency of care; an evaluation is still pending.

Sequencing of Targeted Therapy in Psoriasis: Does it Matter?

With the continued development of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis, some patients have achieved optimal control, but a recommended biologic sequence if a biologic fails to initially improve the skin, termed primary nonresponse, or loses efficacy after initial improvement, termed secondary nonresponse, is still lacking. Primary and secondary nonresponse can occur with any class of biologics, and the type of nonresponse can drive the choice of whether to switch within a biologic class or to a different biologic class. The choice of biologic can also be challenging when managing psoriasis and concomitant psoriatic arthritis, as treatment differs on the basis of the severity of both diseases and further classification of axial and peripheral joint involvement. When choosing a biologic, each patient's comorbidities and preferences are also taken into account to provide the optimal therapy. With this lack of an established biologic sequence after biologic failure, the objective of our review is to define a therapy sequence for the tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor classes in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Our proposed biologic sequence was derived through an analysis of the efficacy of each biologic class, primary and secondary nonresponse rates from clinical trials, and clinical experience with expert opinion.

Comparative Effectiveness and Persistence of SB4 and Reference Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in Norway

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare drug effectiveness and persistence between the reference etanercept (ETN) and ETN biosimilar SB4 in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) naive to ETN and to investigate drug effectiveness and persistence in those undergoing a mandatory nonmedical switch from ETN to SB4.

METHODS

We used a retrospective comparative database study including 1,138 patients with PsA treated with ETN or SB4 (years 1999-2021) in Norway. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) and drug persistence were compared between unmatched ETN (n = 644) and SB4 (n = 252) cohorts and in matched analyses (n = 144, both cohorts) at baseline using a propensity score (PS) to adjust for confounders. Drug persistence was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In unmatched analyses, difference in change from baseline between ETN (n = 140) and SB4 (n = 132) for DAS28 at one year was mean 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.96) in favor of ETN. In PS-matched analyses, the difference in change from baseline between ETN (n = 54) and SB4 (n = 54) was mean 0.09 (95% CI -0.33 to 0.50), and the mean difference assessed with an analysis of covariance model was 0.01 (95% CI -0.38 to 0.40), both within predefined equivalence margin (±0.6). Drug persistence at one year was mean 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.78) for ETN, mean 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.63) for SB4, hazard ratio (HR) 2.45 (95% CI 2.02-2.97) in unmatched analysis, and mean 0.55 (95% CI 0.46-0.63) for ETN, mean 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.67) for SB4, HR 1.29 (95%CI 0.94-1.76) in PS-matched cohorts.

CONCLUSION

At one year, outcomes for PsA disease activity and drug persistence were comparable for patients treated with either ETN or SB4. In patients undergoing a mandatory nonmedical switch from ETN to SB4, drug effectiveness was maintained during a two-year period.

Targeted therapies for uveitis in spondyloarthritis: A narrative review

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a group of chronic inflammatory disorders of the joints frequently associated with uveitis in almost a quarter of cases. SpA-related uveitis typically affects the eye anterior chamber with sudden onset, causing pain, redness, photophobia, and blurred vision. Ophthalmologists will describe an acute anterior unilateral uveitis. Most patients present with episodic acute anterior non-granulomatous uveitis and retain excellent visual acuity. However, systemic treatments are recommended in the event of frequent relapses (2-3/year) or in rare cases of sight-threatening with ocular complications. The improved understanding of the pathogenesis of SpA has led to the management of this disease by biologics. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target specific components in inflammatory pathways for the treatment of SpA-related uveitis. These therapies are recommended for long-term control when uveitis relapses occur too frequently despite conventional systemic treatments. Significant benefits have been obtained with the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis), particularly infliximab and adalimumab. Paradoxically, a high number of uveitis occurrences have been shown on etanercept. Mixed results have been demonstrated with interleukin-17 antagonists (secukinumab) and interleukin-12/interleukin-23 antagonists (ustekinumab) in cases of failure of TNFis. JAK inhibitors seem to be a valuable class of medications for these patients in the future. Although SpA-related uveitis is typically managed with conventional local and/or systemic treatments, these biological/targeted therapies may provide avenues to control both the underlying SpA and uveitis manifestations. Thus, a close collaboration between patients, rheumatologists, internists, and ophthalmologists is needed to optimally manage ocular inflammation in SpA.

Diabetes and obesity burden and improvements in cardiometabolic parameters in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis receiving apremilast in a real-world setting

Introduction

Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis have a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic comorbidities compared to the general population. Clinical data suggest apremilast may reduce weight and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Objective

To describe changes in cardiometabolic parameters among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis newly treated with apremilast by prediabetes/diabetes or obesity status.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records from patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud who newly initiated apremilast. Changes from baseline in body mass index, weight, HbA1c, and lipids were evaluated at 6 and 12 months using a multivariable linear regression model stratified by prediabetes/diabetes or obesity status.

Results

Of 8487 patients initiating apremilast, 24% had diabetes. Of 8250 patients with body mass index available, 27% were obese and 34% were severely obese. Patients experienced decreases in body mass index and weight at 6 and 12 months regardless of diabetes or obesity status, with the greatest reductions seen in those with diabetes and obesity. Reductions in HbA1c at 6 months were seen in patients without diabetes and patients with severe obesity.

Conclusions

Treatment with apremilast may provide the greatest cardiometabolic benefit to those with the greatest burden of cardiometabolic disease.

Switching related to inefficacy in biologics and targeted synthetic therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a comparative real-life study

Background

Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; however, studies including real-life data are scarce.

Objectives

To assess the incidence rate (IR) of switching between biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) due to inefficacy in PsA, and to compare the risk of switching due to inefficacy across different b/tsDMARDs groups.

Design

A longitudinal retrospective study, spanning from 2007 to 2022, was conducted on patients with PsA treated with b/tsDMARDs at an outpatient rheumatology clinic.

Methods

The primary outcome was switching between b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy. The independent variable was the exposure to b/tsDMARDs during follow-up. As covariates, clinical, treatment-related, and sociodemographic variables were considered. Survival techniques were run to estimate the IR of switching due to inefficacy per 100 patients*year and confidence interval at 95% (95% CI). Cox multivariate regression analyses were run to assess the risk of b/tsDMARDs switching due to inefficacy, expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI.

Results

In all, 141 patients were included, with 893.09 patients*year follow-ups. 52.48% of them were females in their fifties. In total, 262 courses of treatment were recorded. During the study period, 56 patients presented 121 switches and 103 related to inefficacy (IR: 11.53 (9.51-13.98)). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) showed the lowest IR. In the bivariate analysis, all b/tsDMARDs had more risk of switching compared to TNFi (HR: anti-lL-17 vs TNFi: 2.26 (1.17-4.36); others vs TNFi: 3.21 (1.59-6.45)); however, this statistical significance was no longer present in the multivariate analysis once adjustments were made for the covariates. Still, the final model achieved statistical significance in the following variables: gender, clinical symptoms, prescription year, therapy courses, glucocorticoids, and sulfasalazine.

Conclusion

In this study, we did not find differences in the rate of switching due to inefficacy among different groups of b/tsDMARDs. Other concomitant treatments, sociodemographic, and clinical variables were identified as risk factors for switching due to inefficacy.

High-quality research on physical therapy in psoriatic arthritis is needed: a systematic review

Objectives

Although physical therapy is recommended as part of the non-pharmacological management of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the evidence is still unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and appraise the quality of research on physical therapy in the management of patients with PsA.

Methods

In June 2024, a systematic literature search using four different databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) was performed to include interventional and observational studies examining physical therapy in patients with PsA (PROSPERO ID 255501). A risk of bias assessment was conducted. Due to the wide variety of interventions and outcomes, a narrative synthesis was used.

Results

Of 9442 abstracts, 15 papers examining physical therapy uptake in clinical practice (N = 2) and different physical therapy interventions (N = 13) were included: cardiorespiratory exercises (N = 5), resistance exercises (N = 2), therapeutic modalities (N = 4) and mixed rehabilitation programs (N = 2). A low risk of bias was scored in only one RCT assessing cardiorespiratory exercises. The well-tolerated 11-week high-intensity interval training resulted in a long-term increase in peak oxygen uptake and a short-term decrease in truncal fat percentage in patients with low disease activity. Resistance training in patients with active disease did not increase muscle strength, but improved functional capacity, disease activity, pain and general health after the intervention. Evidence for other modalities was inconclusive.

Conclusion

High-quality evidence on physical therapy in PsA was scarce. Cardiorespiratory and resistance exercises demonstrated promising results to positively influence cardiometabolic risk as well as disease-related outcomes. Future research on physical therapy in PsA with adequate methodological quality is needed.

Long-term retention rates of anti-tumour necrosis factor and anti-interleukin-17 antibodies for patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

While biologics have been used for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, there remains to be unknown concerning long-term retention rates. This study aims to present real-world data about long-term retention rates of biologics for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, and to undertake an analysis of the contributing factors.

METHODS

We examined retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation for biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in 146 prescriptions (of which, 109 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since March 2010.

RESULTS

Throughout the entire course of the study, the 10-year retention rates were approximately 70% for adalimumab, 50% for ixekizumab, and 40% for secukinumab. When evaluating retention rates in the biologic-naïve subgroups, the 10-year retention rates were all approximately 70%. Regarding certolizumab pegol, the 3-year retention rate was approximately 75%. For adalimumab, a higher degree of arthritis at the initiation of treatment was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of secondary inefficacy. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy, except for ixekizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Each biologic exhibited a favourable long-term retention rate. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy. Regarding adalimumab, secondary inefficacy was linked to the extent of arthritis upon treatment initiation.

[Head-to-head studies on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis]

Given the ever-increasing number of approved therapies for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), head-to-head (H2H) comparative studies are essential. These are aimed primarily at a comparative analysis of treatment effectiveness. In both PsO and PsA, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have been shown to be superior to conventional therapies in H2H studies. In PsO interleukin 17 (IL-17) and IL-23 inhibitors proved superiority compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (etanercept and adalimumab) in several studies. Ustekinumab was more effective than etanercept, but less effective than IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Only a few H2H studies have been published on the treatment of PsA. In the Spirit H2H study ixekizumab was superior to adalimumab using a combined endpoint of arthritis and psoriasis response (ACR-50 and PASI-100). When looking at arthritic symptoms only (ACR-20), secukinumab was not significantly superior to adalimumab in the EXCEED study but was superior in terms of the effect on skin involvement (PASI90). Other H2H studies focused on the treatment of enthesitis (ECLIPSA study), the efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition (SELECT-PSA-1) or the additional administration of methotrexate to bDMARD treatment (MUST study). The H2H data have been incorporated into the treatment guidelines and have led to IL-17 and IL-23 inhibition being preferred over TNF inhibition in cases of relevant skin involvement in PsA.

Impact of initiation of targeted therapy on the use of psoriatic arthritis-related treatments and healthcare consumption: a cohort study of 9793 patients from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the potential impact of targeted therapies for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on symptomatic treatments (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, opioid analgesics), methotrexate and mood disorder treatments and on hospitalisation and sick leave.

METHODS

Using the French health insurance database, this nationwide cohort study included adults with PsA who were new users (not in the year before the index date) of targeted therapies for ≥9 months during 2015-2021. Main endpoints were difference in proportion of users of associated treatments, hospitalisations and sick leaves between 3 and 9 months after and 6 months before targeted therapy initiation. Logistic regression models adjusted for sex, age, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease and Charlson Comorbidity Index compared the impact of biologics initiation (tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)/interleukin 17 inhibitor (IL17i)/IL12/23i) on associated treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Among 9793 patients initiating targeted therapy for PsA (mean age: 51±13 years, 47% men), 62% initiated TNFi, 14% IL17i, 10% IL12/23i, 1% Janus kinase inhibitor, 12% phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor. After treatment initiation, the proportion of treatment users was significantly reduced for NSAIDs (-15%), opioid analgesics (-9%), prednisone (-9%), methotrexate (-15%) and mood disorder treatments (-2%), along with decreased hospitalisations (-12%) and sick leaves (-4%). TNFi had a greater sparing effect on NSAIDs and prednisone use than IL17i (ORa=1.04, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.07; 1.04, 1.02 to 1.06) and IL12/23i (1.07, 1.04 to 1.10; 1.06, 1.04 to 1.09). Odds of methotrexate discontinuation was reduced with TNFi versus IL17i (0.96, 0.94 to 0.98) and IL12/23i (0.94, 0.92 to 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapy initiation for PsA reduced the use of associated treatment and healthcare, with TNFi having a slightly greater effect than IL17i and IL12/23i, except for methotrexate discontinuation.

Durable control of psoriatic arthritis with guselkumab across domains and patient characteristics: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate patterns of stringent disease control with 2 years of guselkumab across key disease-identified domains and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) defined by baseline characteristics.

METHOD

This post hoc analysis of DISCOVER-2 (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03158285) evaluated biologic-naïve PsA patients (≥ 5 swollen/ ≥ 5 tender joints, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 0.6 mg/dL) randomized to guselkumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab at Weeks 0 and 4, then Q8W; or placebo with crossover to guselkumab Q4W at Week 24. Achievement of American College of Rheumatology 50/70% improvement (ACR50/70), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0, dactylitis/enthesitis resolution, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue response (≥ 4-point improvement), HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response (≥ 0.35-point improvement), PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), and minimal disease activity (MDA) was assessed at Weeks 24, 52, and 100 in subgroups defined by sex and baseline medication use, body mass index, PsA duration, swollen/tender joints, CRP, and psoriasis severity/extent. Patients with missing categorical response data were considered nonresponders.

RESULTS

442/493 (90%) guselkumab-randomized patients completed treatment through Week 100. Significant multi-domain efficacy of guselkumab versus placebo was shown across adequately sized patient subgroups. A pattern of continuous improvement was observed across key PsA domains and PROs within patient subgroups: 65%-85% of guselkumab-randomized patients had enthesitis/dactylitis resolution, 50%-70% achieved complete skin clearance, 60%-80% reported meaningful improvements in function/fatigue, 40%-65% achieved PASDAS LDA, and 35%-50% achieved MDA at Week 100.

CONCLUSION

Patients with active PsA receiving guselkumab demonstrated durable achievement of stringent endpoints associated with disease control across key PsA domains and PROs, regardless of baseline characteristics. Key Points • Among biologic-naïve patients with highly active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), efficacy of guselkumab across stringent disease endpoints and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at Week 24 was consistent regardless of baseline demographics and disease characteristics. • Within guselkumab-randomized PsA patient subgroups, major improvements in joint disease activity, complete skin clearance, dactylitis/enthesitis resolution, clinically meaningful improvements in PROs, and achievement of low overall disease activity were maintained through Week 100. • Durable stringent endpoint achievement indicating disease control was observed with guselkumab, regardless of baseline patient or disease characteristics.

The ATTRACT study: screening for the early identification of axial psoriatic arthritis in a cohort of Italian psoriatic patients

OBJECTIVE

There is growing interest in the early identification of patients with axial PsA (axPsA). We aimed to evaluate whether a dermatology-based screening strategy could help to identify axPsA patients.

METHODS

The dermatologist-centred screening (DCS) questionnaire was administrated by dermatologists to consecutive patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria [(i) age ≥18 years and (ii) clinical diagnosis of psoriasis made by a dermatologist] to identify patients eligible (affirmative answers 1-3c of the DCS) for rheumatological evaluation. Clinical, laboratory, genetic and imaging data were collected from all referred patients.

RESULTS

Among the 365 patients screened, 265 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 124/265 (46.8%) were eligible for rheumatological referral. Diagnosis of axPsA, with or without peripheral PsA (pPsA), was made in 36/124 (29.0%) patients; pPsA without axial involvement was found in 21/124 (16.9%) patients. Back pain at screening was recorded in 174 (66%) patients, with 158 (60%) reporting a back pain duration longer than 3 months and 140 (53%) reporting back pain onset before the age of 45 years. Active inflammatory and/or structural post-inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints and/or spine were observed in all axPsA patients. Patients with PsA showed a numerically longer duration of back pain and higher CRP levels in comparison with patients with psoriasis without PsA.

CONCLUSION

The DCS tool proved to be a valuable screening strategy for detecting and characterizing patients with axPsA in a real-life cohort of psoriasis patients in a dermatological setting and helped to identify a substantial number of patients affected by undiagnosed pPsA.

The role of bDMARDs in the prevention and treatment of inflammatory-related comorbidities in Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-inflammatory disease that affects both joints and entheses, and with diverse extra-articular manifestations (psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and uveitis). A wide range of comorbid conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, obesity, metabolic syndrome (MetS), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), mental health disorders (depression/anxiety), and osteoporosis are highly prevalent in course of PsA.Biological DMARDs (bDMARD), including TNF-inhibitors (TNFi), Interleukin (IL-17i) and IL-23i represent the cornerstone of the management of active disease. The use of these therapies obviously requires considering comorbidities presence, safety aspects and contraindications.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to describe the inflammatory mechanisms behind PsA comorbidities, and the role of bDMARDs in the prevention and treatment of these conditions in course of PsA.

EXPERT OPINION

Tailoring therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each PsA patient can be an effective approach to manage comorbidities, maximizing the efficacy of bDMARDs, and reducing the incidence of AEs. Identifying targets within disease pathways can guide research into therapeutics that address both PsA and comorbidities simultaneously, but more studies are advocated for clarifying the potential prevention and management of bDMARDs used for PsA.

Significant functional impairment and disability in individuals with psoriatic arthritis and Achilles tendon pain: a cross-sectional observational study

The Achilles tendon (AT) insertion is the most common site of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The structure and function of the AT in PsA, and the prevalence of mid-portion pathology, is unknown. To compare the structure and function of the AT in people with PsA with self-reported AT pain (PsA + AT), PsA without self-reported AT pain (PsA-AT) and healthy controls. A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted. The ATs were assessed by clinical and US examination (B-mode and Power Doppler), performance-based testing (bilateral heel raise test (HRT) and 10 m walk test), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (including the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles [VISA-A]). Between-group differences were described using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared testing, parametric (1-way ANOVA) and non-parametric (Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis) testing. 22 PsA (11 per group) and 11 healthy control participants who were comparable in terms of sex, age, and BMI (PsA-AT = longer PsA disease duration) were recruited. VISA-A scores were significantly worse in the PsA + AT group compared to the PsA-AT group and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Inflammatory US features were significantly more prevalent in the PsA + AT group (p < 0.001). Mid-portion AT pathology was observed in the PsA + AT group, irrespective of entheseal disease. Clinical examination alone missed 5/7 cases of 'active' US-confirmed AT enthesitis. AT functional deficits were significant in the PsA + AT group and both PsA groups had lower HRT repetition rates and walked slower compared to healthy controls. Less than 1/3 of the PsA + AT group had received podiatry or physiotherapy care. Significant differences in the structure and function of the AT in PsA were noted. Despite management in line with current guidance, AT pain appears to persist and can result in severe functional impairment.

Association Between Achievement of Clinical Disease Control and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

We explored the relationship between achievement of clinical disease control and improvements in and normative values for patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including quality of life (QoL) measures, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of 104-week data from the SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 trials in adults with PsA and inadequate response to one or more conventional synthetic (SELECT-PsA 1) or biologic (SELECT-PsA 2) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Patients were initially randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) to placebo switched to upadacitinib 15 mg QD at week 24 or to adalimumab 40 mg every other week (SELECT-PsA 1 only), and data were pooled across treatments and analyzed. We evaluated several clinical disease control measures (minimal disease activity [MDA]; very low disease activity [VLDA]; and low disease activity [LDA] and/or remission by Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA], Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score [PASDAS], and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) and examined their associations with improvements and normative values for various PROs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,069 and 317 patients were analyzed for SELECT-PsA 1 and 2, respectively. In both studies, responders (patients who achieved MDA or VLDA, and DAPSA, PASDAS, and RAPID3 LDA or remission) at week 104 achieved more marked changes from baseline, and more responders achieved normative values in PROs compared with nonresponders (most nominal P < 0.0001). Furthermore, numerically larger proportions of responders achieved minimal clinically important differences across PROs compared with nonresponders in both studies. In addition, patients who achieved MDA or VLDA were more likely to achieve DAPSA, PASDAS, and RAPID3 LDA or remission (all nominal P < 0.0001) for upadacitinib 15 mg QD and when treatment arms were pooled.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA who achieve clinical disease control are more likely to achieve improvements and normative values in PROs and QoL measures, which reinforces disease control as a treatment target.

Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis With or Without Methotrexate: 52-Week Results From Two Phase 3 Studies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess 52-week efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with or without concomitant methotrexate (+/-MTX) treatment at baseline.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients in BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; prior inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]), and the BE VITAL open-label extension (NCT04009499) study. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups: bimekizumab 160 mg every four weeks, placebo, or a reference drug (adalimumab 40 mg every two weeks; BE OPTIMAL only). From Week 16, placebo-randomized patients received bimekizumab. Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation, multiple imputation, or worst-category imputation.

RESULTS

Through Week 52, similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response criteria for both +MTX and -MTX (BE OPTIMAL: 54.4% +MTX, 54.7% -MTX; BE COMPLETE: 56.3% +MTX, 48.0% -MTX). Similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% [PASI100] response) and minimal disease activity in both +MTX and -MTX groups. Similar trends were seen in placebo/bimekizumab-treated patients. Through Week 52, the proportion of bimekizumab-treated patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event were similar between the +MTX and -MTX groups (BE OPTIMAL 325 of 410 [79.3%] vs 230 of 292 [78.8%], BE COMPLETE 105 of 168 [62.5%] vs 138 of 220 [62.7%]). The safety profile was comparable between subgroups and consistent with the prior safety profile of bimekizumab.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with bimekizumab demonstrated consistent, sustained efficacy to 52 weeks in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with PsA and was well tolerated, irrespective of concomitant MTX.

Treatment controversies in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: focus on biologics and targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

There are several treatment controversies that have emerged in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. These are related to the nature of the conditions as well as to the use of medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review, which included a search of PubMed database as well as the references within the articles provides an overview of the nature of spondyloarthritis, controversy over the inclusion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a peripheral spondyloarthritis, and a summary of current treatments for both PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), with special emphasis on targeted therapy. The review highlights the differences in response to certain medications, particularly biologic therapy and summarizes the randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis providing data about the responses in table format.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for better outcome measures in axSpA. Currently, the measures are subjective. Imaging may be more appropriate but there is a need for research into the reliability and responsiveness of imaging techniques. In PsA, there may also be better response measures and research into the reliability and responsiveness of available measures is underway. There is also a need for novel therapies as well as biomarkers for response in both diseases.

Early psoriatic arthritis: when is the right time to start advanced therapy?

Despite significant advances in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the last two decades, remission remains elusive and there is no cure. Evidence from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) confirming enhanced response and outcome from earlier treatment intervention suggests the plausibility of the window of opportunity in the pathogenesis of RA. Yet, data are lacking in PsA. Although treatment response may be enhanced in shorter disease duration, it is unknown how this early intervention may impact long-term outcomes. Furthermore, it remains to be demonstrated whether there is a best treatment strategy and time of intervention. Crucially, the main hurdle when aiming for early treatment intervention is the ability to achieve a timely diagnosis that highlights the need to focus research efforts on characterizing the very early disease stages including the transition to PsA in the at-risk psoriasis population.

The mechano-chemical circuit in fibroblasts and dendritic cells drives basal cell proliferation in psoriasis

Psoriasis is an intractable immune-mediated disorder that disrupts the skin barrier. While studies have dissected the mechanism by which immune cells directly regulate epidermal cell proliferation, the involvement of dermal fibroblasts in the progression of psoriasis remains unclear. Here, we identified that signals from dendritic cells (DCs) that migrate to the dermal-epidermal junction region enhance dermal stiffness by increasing extracellular matrix (ECM) expression, which further promotes basal epidermal cell hyperproliferation. We analyzed cell-cell interactions and observed stronger interactions between DCs and fibroblasts than between DCs and epidermal cells. Using single-cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, immunostaining, and stiffness measurement, we found that DC-secreted LGALS9 can be received by CD44+ dermal fibroblasts, leading to increased ECM expression that creates a stiffer dermal environment. By employing mouse psoriasis and skin organoid models, we discovered a mechano-chemical signaling pathway that originates from DCs, extends to dermal fibroblasts, and ultimately enhances basal cell proliferation in psoriatic skin.

No difference in clinical parameters and drug retention in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate: data from the RABBIT-SpA registry

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and patient reported characteristics as well as drug retention rates in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy or in combination with MTX.

METHODS

RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients. In this analysis, PsA patients were stratified into two groups: starting b/tsDMARD as monotherapy or in combination with MTX. Treatment retention was compared by drug survival analysis.

RESULTS

69% of the patients (n=900) started b/tsDMARD as monotherapy while 31% were treated in combination with MTX (n=405). At baseline, clinical domains like skin, nail and joint affection, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement were similar between the groups. Only the patients' satisfaction concerning tolerability of the previous treatment was significantly better in the combination group at treatment start. Drug retention rates did not differ between the groups (p=0.4). At 6/12 months, 66%/48% of patients in monotherapy and 67%/48% in the combination group were still on their original treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any clinical parameters with notable influence on the choice of b/tsDMARD mono or MTX-combination therapy in PsA. Drug retention rates are similar between mono and combination therapy. It seems that the decision to continue MTX at initiation of b/tsDMARDs is mostly based on the subjective tolerability of MTX treatment.

Individual joints involvement pattern in psoriatic arthritis: A cross-sectional study in China

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is characterized by multi-joint involvement, primarily affecting the small joints in the hands and feet. However, the specific pattern of joint involvement at an individual level remains uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the pattern of joint involvement in a PsA cohort. Patients diagnosed with PsA were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, personal and family history, and comorbidity data were collected. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and univariate and multivariate regression models were used to examine baseline factors influencing joint involvement. A total of 264 PsA patients (156 males) were included in the study. The results revealed a predominant involvement of peripheral facet joints. The second proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) of the right hand exhibited the highest prevalence of swelling (18.9%), while the right knee joint had the highest prevalence of tenderness (24.2%). Older age and earlier onset of PsA were identified as independent factors associated with the swelling of the second PIP of the right hand. Older age, earlier onset of PsA, lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and higher Dermatology Life Quality Index scores were identified as independent factors associated with the tenderness of the right knee joint. In conclusion, the most commonly affected joints in PsA are the second PIP of the right hand and the right knee joint.

Psoriasis Comorbidities and Their Treatment Impact

Psoriasis, a systemic inflammatory disease classically presenting with cutaneous lesions, has significant involvement in other organ systems. This article explores the prevalence, clinical manifestations, screening mechanisms, and laboratory testing by which to evaluate these comorbidities. Treatment approach for these comorbidities must combine patient preference with established treatment algorithms while recognizing innovative therapeutics currently under development.

Role of Anti-Inflammatory Diet and Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Psoriatic Arthritis

PURPOSE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition with complex and heterogenous manifestations. Although a myriad of treatment options including biologic medications are available to alleviate symptoms and slow disease progression, there is currently no cure for this condition. There has been a recent emergence of understanding about the relationship between the gut microbiome and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. This has generated interest in the potential role of dietary interventions, particularly anti-inflammatory diets, and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) as novel therapeutic approaches. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine the role of an anti-inflammatory diet and FMT in turn and whether their combination may offer alternate approaches for the management of PsA.

METHODS

Our non-systematic narrative review was informed by a literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar using the terms anti-inflammatory diet, FMT, nutrition supplements, and PsA. Preclinical studies and non-English language articles were excluded when synthesizing the narrative review.

FINDINGS

Current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational evidence suggest that a hypocaloric diet or Mediterranean diet can help achieve weight loss among PsA patients who are overweight or obese, which in turn reduces inflammation and improves disease activity. However, there is no strong data to support the beneficial effects of intermittent fasting, vitamin supplements, turmeric supplements, probiotics, or omega-3 fatty acid supplements in PsA. Current evidence on the use of FMT in PsA is limited as only one small RCT has been conducted which did not demonstrate efficacy for improving clinical symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians can consider recommending hypocaloric or Mediterranean diets as an adjunct to standard management of PsA, possibly under the guidance of a dietician. Further research is needed to explore the beneficial effects of the synergistic role of combining an anti-inflammatory diet with FMT in PsA.

Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis-Related Enthesitis and Persistence on Tofacitinib Under Real-World Conditions

OBJECTIVE

Information on the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is scarce in real-world conditions. Our objective was to analyze the persistence and safety of TOF under these conditions.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study of all patients with PsA who received at least 1 dose of TOF. The main focus was on adverse events (AEs) and drug survival. Drug survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and persistence explanatory factors by multivariate Cox regression models. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to measure association.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included, 54 women and 18 men, mean age 51.9 (SD 11.1) years, mean disease duration of 10.4 (SD 6.99) years. TOF was ≥ third line of therapy in > 70% of cases. The median survival was 13.0 (IQR 5.3-29.0) months. One-year retention rate was 52.7% (95% CI 42.4-65.6). TOF survival was not influenced by sex, disease duration, comorbidities, or line of treatment. Younger patients (HR 0.96, P = 0.01) and those with enthesitis (HR 0.37, P = 0.03) showed lower odds of drug discontinuation. The overall rate of AEs was 52.9 (95% CI 38.5-70.6)/100 person-years. Most AEs occurred during the first 6 months of exposure.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, TOF showed a reasonably good retention rate in a PsA population that was mostly refractory to biologic and oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. There were no new causes for concern regarding safety. Patients with refractory PsA and enthesitis might be a specific target population for this drug.