1
|
Yang L, Lu S, Zhou L. The Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Infection Prevention and Control: Current Progress and Future Perspectives. China CDC Wkly 2024; 6:901-904. [PMID: 39233995 PMCID: PMC11369059 DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Shuya Lu
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Lei Zhou
- Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hasner MC, van Opijnen MP, de Vos FYF, Cuppen E, Broekman MLD. Whole genome sequencing in (recurrent) glioblastoma: challenges related to informed consent procedures and data sharing. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:266. [PMID: 38874628 PMCID: PMC11178618 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06158-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
Increased use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in neuro-oncology for diagnostics and research purposes necessitates a renewed conversation about informed consent procedures and governance structures for sharing personal health data. There is currently no consensus on how to obtain informed consent for WGS in this population. In this narrative review, we analyze the formats and contents of frameworks suggested in literature for WGS in oncology and assess their benefits and limitations. We discuss applicability, specific challenges, and legal context for patients with (recurrent) glioblastoma. This population is characterized by the rarity of the disease, extremely limited prognosis, and the correlation of the stage of the disease with cognitive abilities. Since this has implications for the informed consent procedure for WGS, we suggest that the content of informed consent should be tailor-made for (recurrent) glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira C Hasner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mark P van Opijnen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.
| | - Filip Y F de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Oncode Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliva R, Grassi S, Marchetti C, Cazzato F, Marinelli R, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Medicolegal and insurance issues regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene tests in high income countries. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:935-941. [PMID: 38642925 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is an autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility syndrome mainly due to variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Patients presenting with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations have a lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer (80% and 40%, respectively). Genetic testing to explore the predisposition to develop cancer represents a pivotal factor in such cases, and this review wants to explore the main implications in terms of medicolegal liability and insurance issues. Medicolegal issues related to these diagnostic processes include: (a) failure to recommend the test; (b) failure to properly interpret the test; (c) failure to correctly translate results into clinical practice; (d) lack of informed consent; and (e) failure to refer patients to specialized genetic counseling. Such errors may lead to compensation since the legal burden inherent in the efficacy of prophylactic interventions is a proof that requires the so-called 'preponderance of the evidence'. Concerning insurance issues, the carriers of such alleles without cancer are healthy because the genetic predisposition is not a disease per se but represents a (relevant) health risk. However, disclosure of these conditions can be impelled by insurers. It can lead to so-called 'genetic discrimination' because insurance companies might use genetic information to limit insurance options or increase their costs. Many private and public healthcare funders do not cover risk reducing surgeries, even when recommended as part of a risk reduction management plan for BRCA gene mutation carriers. Here, positions on these matters from different high income countries are discussed, stressing the importance of a common supranational or international regulatory framework to reach a trade-off between the economic interests of insurers and the rights of carriers not to disclose extremely sensitive information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Oliva
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Simone Grassi
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Forensic Medical Sciences, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Cazzato
- Section Legal Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberta Marinelli
- Section Legal Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Campus di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Department of Women's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartels K, Afonso S, Brown L, Carriles C, Kim R, Lazier J, Mercimek-Andrews S, Nelson TN, Stedman I, Thain E, Vanneste R, Chad L. Next generation of free? Points to consider when navigating sponsored genetic testing. J Med Genet 2024; 61:299-304. [PMID: 37932018 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Genetics has been integrated into patient care across many subspecialties. However, genetic and genomic testing (GT) remain expensive with disparities in access both within Canada and internationally. It is, therefore, not surprising that sponsored GT has emerged as one alternative. Sponsored GT, for the purpose of this document, refers to clinical-grade GT partially or fully subsidised by industry. In return, industry sponsors-usually pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies-may have access to patients' genetic data, practitioner information, DNA and/or other information. The availability of sponsored GT options in the Canadian healthcare landscape has appeared to simplify patient and practitioner access to GT, but the potential ethical and legal considerations, as well as the nuances of a publicly funded healthcare system, must also be considered. This document offers preliminary guidance for Canadian healthcare practitioners encountering sponsored GT in practice. Further research and dialogue is urgently needed to explore this issue to provide fulsome considerations that one must be aware of when availing such options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Bartels
- Department of Medicine, Providence Health Care Heart Centre, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Samantha Afonso
- Heart, Lung and Vascular Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay Brown
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Claudia Carriles
- Genomics Laboratory, Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanna Lazier
- Medical Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tanya N Nelson
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ian Stedman
- School of Public Policy and Administration, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Thain
- Familial Cancer Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Vanneste
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Lauren Chad
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsieh E, Morrissey BS, Chiareli IA. The Landscape of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Reproductive Health Contexts: An Analytical Framework of Stakeholders and Their Competing Motivations. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38317624 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2312607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
We propose a theoretical framework that identifies (a) the different categories of stakeholders and (b) the normative values that drive their attitudes toward direct-to-consumer genetic testing, with an emphasis on the reproductive health contexts. We conducted a literature search using varied combinations of search terms, including direct-to-consumer genetic testing, decision-making, reproductive health, and policy. Using a grounded theory approach to existing literature and in combination with a narrative review, we present a systematic framework of five categories of stakeholders (i.e., genome-driven stakeholders, industry-driven stakeholders, history-driven stakeholders, value-driven stakeholders, and social justice-driven stakeholders) that shape the public's discourse. Moving beyond the dialectical ethics that have governed the public discourse, we also identify the normative values and interests that motivate different stakeholders' attitudes and decision-making through theoretical sampling under the grounded theory. We investigate the competing and conflicting values within the same category of stakeholders. For example, despite being industry-driven stakeholders, medical professionals' attitudes are driven by concerns about standards of care; in contrast, health insurance companies' concerns are centered on profit. We further explore the tensions between these stakeholders that impact their strategic alliances and pose challenges to the practices of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Finally, we examine how these stakeholders and their corresponding values may shape future development and policies of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the context of reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Hsieh
- Department of Communication Studies, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zahid MF, Moriarty K, Dryden C, Weinberg O, Asif M, Ikpefan R, Anderson JM, Collins RH, Chung SS, Chen W, Patel PA, Madanat YF. Identifying patients at risk for hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes incorporating a novel, self-administered questionnaire to an initial screening platform. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:844-850. [PMID: 37587783 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Four to 10% of cases of myeloid malignancies are inherited. We report our experience on hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes (HMMS) incorporating a novel questionnaire in the screening platform for patients with myeloid malignancies and aplastic anemia. METHODS The questionnaire was sent via electronic patient portal prior to clinic visits. Patients screened positive based on responses to questionnaire items, presence of suspicion disease characteristics (young age, family history, monosomy 7 etc.) and/or presence of signs of HMMS. Those deemed at-risk based on questionnaire responses, clinical features and/or somatic mutation profile were offered germline testing. RESULTS A total of 408 patients were screened, 141 (35%) were deemed at-risk. Fifty-four (38%) of at-risk patients were seen in the genetics clinic. Forty-one (76%) of the patients seen agreed to germline testing and 13 declined due to cost or personal decision. Twenty pathogenic (P)/likely-pathogenic (LP) germline mutations were identified in 16 (39%) of the tested patients. Five patients also had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and an additional 13 had at least 1 VUS without P/LP mutations (total 29 VUS's were found in 18 (44%) of tested patients). The median age of diagnosis for patients with P/LP mutations was 56 years versus 66 years in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION Incorporating an electronic questionnaire is an effective screening method for HMMS. Many patients declined testing due to cost. These results highlight the importance of germline testing in patients with myeloid malignancies, further research in HMMS, and coverage by healthcare plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Faizan Zahid
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Leukemia Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kelsey Moriarty
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Courtney Dryden
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Olga Weinberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Misha Asif
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ruth Ikpefan
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Julia M Anderson
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert H Collins
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Leukemia Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen S Chung
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Leukemia Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Weina Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Prapti A Patel
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Leukemia Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yazan F Madanat
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Leukemia Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benevento M, Mandarelli G, Carravetta F, Ferorelli D, Caterino C, Nicolì S, Massari A, Solarino B. Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1213615. [PMID: 37546309 PMCID: PMC10397406 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the age of digitalization and big data, personal health information is a key resource for health care and clinical research. This study aimed to analyze the determinants and describe the measurement of the willingness to disclose personal health information. Methods The study conducted a systematic review of articles assessing willingness to share personal health information as a primary or secondary outcome. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol. English and Italian peer-reviewed research articles were included with no restrictions for publication years. Findings were narratively synthesized. Results The search strategy found 1,087 papers, 89 of which passed the screening for title and abstract and the full-text assessment. Conclusion No validated measurement tool has been developed for willingness to share personal health information. The reviewed papers measured it through surveys, interviews, and questionnaires, which were mutually incomparable. The secondary use of data was the most important determinant of willingness to share, whereas clinical and socioeconomic variables had a slight effect. The main concern discouraging data sharing was privacy, although good data anonymization and the high perceived benefits of sharing may overcome this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Benevento
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Ferorelli
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Cristina Caterino
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Simona Nicolì
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Massari
- Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Biagio Solarino
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abondio P, Cilli E, Luiselli D. Human Pangenomics: Promises and Challenges of a Distributed Genomic Reference. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1360. [PMID: 37374141 DOI: 10.3390/life13061360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
A pangenome is a collection of the common and unique genomes that are present in a given species. It combines the genetic information of all the genomes sampled, resulting in a large and diverse range of genetic material. Pangenomic analysis offers several advantages compared to traditional genomic research. For example, a pangenome is not bound by the physical constraints of a single genome, so it can capture more genetic variability. Thanks to the introduction of the concept of pangenome, it is possible to use exceedingly detailed sequence data to study the evolutionary history of two different species, or how populations within a species differ genetically. In the wake of the Human Pangenome Project, this review aims at discussing the advantages of the pangenome around human genetic variation, which are then framed around how pangenomic data can inform population genetics, phylogenetics, and public health policy by providing insights into the genetic basis of diseases or determining personalized treatments, targeting the specific genetic profile of an individual. Moreover, technical limitations, ethical concerns, and legal considerations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Abondio
- Laboratory of Ancient DNA, Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cilli
- Laboratory of Ancient DNA, Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| | - Donata Luiselli
- Laboratory of Ancient DNA, Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Halbisen AL, Lu CY. Trends in Availability of Genetic Tests in the United States, 2012-2022. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040638. [PMID: 37109024 PMCID: PMC10142561 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, genetic testing has become increasingly used over the last two decades. As a result of the rapid development of genetic tests, the Genetic Testing Registry was created in the United States to provide transparent information on genetic tests and the corresponding laboratories. Using publicly available data from the Genetic Testing Registry, we analyzed trends in the availability of genetic tests in the United States over the last decade. As of November 2022, a total of 129,624 and 197,779 genetic tests in the US and globally, respectively, including updated versions of previously existing tests, have been made available and submitted to the genetic testing registry. Over 90% of tests submitted to GTR are for clinical rather than research purposes. Worldwide, 1081 and 6214 new genetic tests had been made available in 2012 and in 2022, respectively. In 2012, only 607 and in 2022, 3097 new genetic tests were made available in the US, with 2016 seeing the biggest increase in availability of new tests during the study period. Over 90% of tests can be used for diagnosis. In the US, 10 of >250 laboratories account for 81% of new genetic tests in GTR. As more genetic tests become available, further international collaboration is required for a comprehensive understanding of the available genetic tests worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa L Halbisen
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2077, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hanson EN, Delacroix E, Austin S, Carr G, Kidwell KM, Bacon E, Gerido LH, Griggs JJ, Stoffel EM, Resnicow K. Psychosocial factors impacting barriers and motivators to cancer genetic testing. Cancer Med 2023; 12:9945-9955. [PMID: 36808717 PMCID: PMC10166953 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only a small proportion of patients who qualify for clinical genetic testing for cancer susceptibility get testing. Many patient-level barriers contribute to low uptake. In this study, we examined self-reported patient barriers and motivators for cancer genetic testing. METHODS A survey comprised of both new and existing measures related to barriers and motivators to genetic testing was emailed to patients with a diagnosis of cancer at a large academic medical center. Patients who self-reported receiving a genetic test were included in these analyses (n = 376). Responses about emotions following testing as well as barriers and motivators prior to getting testing were examined. Group differences in barriers and motivators by patient demographic characteristics were examined. RESULTS Being assigned female at birth was associated with increased emotional, insurance, and family concerns as well as increased health benefits compared to patients assigned male at birth. Younger respondents had significantly higher emotional and family concerns compared to older respondents. Recently diagnosed respondents expressed fewer concerns about insurance implications and emotional concerns. Those with a BRCA-related cancer had higher scores on social and interpersonal concerns scale than those with other cancers. Participants with higher depression scores indicated increased emotional, social and interpersonal, and family concerns. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported depression emerged as the most consistent factor influencing report of barriers to genetic testing. By incorporating mental health resources into clinical practice, oncologists may better identify those patients who might need more assistance following through with a referral for genetic testing and the response afterwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika N. Hanson
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Emerson Delacroix
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Sarah Austin
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Grant Carr
- School of Public Health, Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Kelley M. Kidwell
- School of Public Health, Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Elizabeth Bacon
- Center for Health Communications Research, Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan MedicineAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Lynette Hammond Gerido
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Jennifer J. Griggs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Management and PolicyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and InnovationAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Elena M. Stoffel
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and InnovationAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Ken Resnicow
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and InnovationAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Becherucci F, Landini S, Palazzo V, Cirillo L, Raglianti V, Lugli G, Tiberi L, Dirupo E, Bellelli S, Mazzierli T, Lomi J, Ravaglia F, Sansavini G, Allinovi M, Giannese D, Somma C, Spatoliatore G, Vergani D, Artuso R, Rosati A, Cirami C, Dattolo PC, Campolo G, De Chiara L, Papi L, Vaglio A, Lazzeri E, Anders HJ, Mazzinghi B, Romagnani P. A Clinical Workflow for Cost-Saving High-Rate Diagnosis of Genetic Kidney Diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:706-720. [PMID: 36753701 PMCID: PMC10103218 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT To optimize the diagnosis of genetic kidney disorders in a cost-effective manner, we developed a workflow based on referral criteria for in-person evaluation at a tertiary center, whole-exome sequencing, reverse phenotyping, and multidisciplinary board analysis. This workflow reached a diagnostic rate of 67%, with 48% confirming and 19% modifying the suspected clinical diagnosis. We obtained a genetic diagnosis in 64% of children and 70% of adults. A modeled cost analysis demonstrated that early genetic testing saves 20% of costs per patient. Real cost analysis on a representative sample of 66 patients demonstrated an actual cost reduction of 41%. This workflow demonstrates feasibility, performance, and economic effect for the diagnosis of genetic kidney diseases in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND Whole-exome sequencing (WES) increases the diagnostic rate of genetic kidney disorders, but accessibility, interpretation of results, and costs limit use in daily practice. METHODS Univariable analysis of a historical cohort of 392 patients who underwent WES for kidney diseases showed that resistance to treatments, familial history of kidney disease, extrarenal involvement, congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract and CKD stage ≥G2, two or more cysts per kidney on ultrasound, persistent hyperechoic kidneys or nephrocalcinosis on ultrasound, and persistent metabolic abnormalities were most predictive for genetic diagnosis. We prospectively applied these criteria to select patients in a network of nephrology centers, followed by centralized genetic diagnosis by WES, reverse phenotyping, and multidisciplinary board discussion. RESULTS We applied this multistep workflow to 476 patients with eight clinical categories (podocytopathies, collagenopathies, CKD of unknown origin, tubulopathies, ciliopathies, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, syndromic CKD, metabolic kidney disorders), obtaining genetic diagnosis for 319 of 476 patients (67.0%) (95% in 21 patients with disease onset during the fetal period or at birth, 64% in 298 pediatric patients, and 70% in 156 adult patients). The suspected clinical diagnosis was confirmed in 48% of the 476 patients and modified in 19%. A modeled cost analysis showed that application of this workflow saved 20% of costs per patient when performed at the beginning of the diagnostic process. Real cost analysis of 66 patients randomly selected from all categories showed actual cost reduction of 41%. CONCLUSIONS A diagnostic workflow for genetic kidney diseases that includes WES is cost-saving, especially if implemented early, and is feasible in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Becherucci
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Samuela Landini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Viviana Palazzo
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Valentina Raglianti
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Lugli
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Tiberi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Elia Dirupo
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Mazzierli
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lomi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Sansavini
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy
| | - Marco Allinovi
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Somma
- Nephrology Unit Florence 1, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spatoliatore
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, AUSL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Debora Vergani
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Rosangela Artuso
- Medical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Rosati
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, AUSL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Calogero Cirami
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Claudio Dattolo
- Nephrology Unit Florence 1, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | - Gesualdo Campolo
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Santo Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy
| | - Letizia De Chiara
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Papi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Augusto Vaglio
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Elena Lazzeri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Hans-Joachim Anders
- Division of Nephrology, Medizinische Klinik and Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedetta Mazzinghi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Paola Romagnani
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio,” University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dusic EJ, Theoryn T, Wang C, Swisher EM, Bowen DJ. Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscape. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:961128. [PMID: 36386046 PMCID: PMC9665160 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.961128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Individual, provider, clinic, and societal level barriers have been shown to undermine the potential impact of genetic testing. The current approach in the primary care setting places an exorbitant burden on both providers and patients. Current literature provides insight into how to address barriers across multiple levels (patient, provider, clinic, system) and at multiple stages in the testing process (identification, referral, counseling, and testing) but interventions have had limited success. After outlining the current approach to genetic testing in the primary care setting, including the barriers that prevent genetic testing uptake and the methods proposed to address these issues, we recommend integrating genetic testing into routine medical care through population-based testing. Success in efforts to increase the uptake of genetic testing will not occur without significant changes to the way genetic services are delivered. These changes will not be instantaneous but are critical in moving this field forward to realize the potential for cancer risk genetic assessment to reduce cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. J. Dusic
- Institute of Public Health Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Correspondence: E. J. Dusic
| | - Tesla Theoryn
- Institute of Public Health Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Catharine Wang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elizabeth M. Swisher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Deborah J. Bowen
- Institute of Public Health Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Bioethics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - EDGE Study Team
- Beth Devine, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Barbara Norquist, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Brian Shirts, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Mariebeth Velasquez, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Michael Raff, Genomics Institute, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, WA, United States
- Jeannine M. Brant, Clinical Science & Innovation, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinzón-Espinosa J, van der Horst M, Zinkstok J, Austin J, Aalfs C, Batalla A, Sullivan P, Vorstman J, Luykx JJ. Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians' attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe. Transl Psychiatry 2022; 12:442. [PMID: 36220808 PMCID: PMC9553897 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing has evolved rapidly over recent years and new developments have the potential to provide insights that could improve the ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent diseases. Information obtained through genetic testing has proven useful in other specialties, such as cardiology and oncology. Nonetheless, a range of barriers impedes techniques, such as whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, pharmacogenomics, and polygenic risk scoring, from being implemented in psychiatric practice. These barriers may be procedural (e.g., limitations in extrapolating results to the individual level), economic (e.g., perceived relatively elevated costs precluding insurance coverage), or related to clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (e.g., perceived unfavorable cost-effectiveness, insufficient understanding of probability statistics, and concerns regarding genetic counseling). Additionally, several ethical concerns may arise (e.g., increased stigma and discrimination through exclusion from health insurance). Here, we provide an overview of potential barriers for the implementation of genetic testing in psychiatry, as well as an in-depth discussion of strategies to address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justo Pinzón-Espinosa
- Sant Pau Mental Health Group, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IBB-Sant Pau), Hospital de la Sant Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Clinical Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama
- Department of Mental Health, Parc Tauli University Hospital, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli (I3PT), Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marte van der Horst
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Outpatient Second Opinion Clinic, GGNet Mental Health, Warnsveld, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Zinkstok
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, Genetic Counselling Training Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cora Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Batalla
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Sullivan
- Center for Psychiatric Genomics, Department of Genetics and Psychiatric, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacob Vorstman
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- The Centre for Applied Genomics, Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jurjen J Luykx
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- Outpatient Second Opinion Clinic, GGNet Mental Health, Warnsveld, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Sullivan JW, Raghavan S, Marquez-Luna C, Luzum JA, Damrauer SM, Ashley EA, O'Donnell CJ, Willer CJ, Natarajan P. Polygenic Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 146:e93-e118. [PMID: 35862132 PMCID: PMC9847481 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading contributor to years lost due to disability or premature death among adults. Current efforts focus on risk prediction and risk factor mitigation' which have been recognized for the past half-century. However, despite advances, risk prediction remains imprecise with persistently high rates of incident cardiovascular disease. Genetic characterization has been proposed as an approach to enable earlier and potentially tailored prevention. Rare mendelian pathogenic variants predisposing to cardiometabolic conditions have long been known to contribute to disease risk in some families. However, twin and familial aggregation studies imply that diverse cardiovascular conditions are heritable in the general population. Significant technological and methodological advances since the Human Genome Project are facilitating population-based comprehensive genetic profiling at decreasing costs. Genome-wide association studies from such endeavors continue to elucidate causal mechanisms for cardiovascular diseases. Systematic cataloging for cardiovascular risk alleles also enabled the development of polygenic risk scores. Genetic profiling is becoming widespread in large-scale research, including in health care-associated biobanks, randomized controlled trials, and direct-to-consumer profiling in tens of millions of people. Thus, individuals and their physicians are increasingly presented with polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular conditions in clinical encounters. In this scientific statement, we review the contemporary science, clinical considerations, and future challenges for polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular diseases. We selected 5 cardiometabolic diseases (coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolic disease) and response to drug therapy and offer provisional guidance to health care professionals, researchers, policymakers, and patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Association between Health Insurance Type and Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081263. [PMID: 36013212 PMCID: PMC9409681 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As genetic testing becomes increasingly incorporated into clinical practice to aid in both the diagnosis and risk assessment of genetic diseases, patients benefit from genetic counseling to support their understanding of test results either before and/or after genetic testing. Therefore, access to genetic testing and counseling is imperative for patient care. It is well established that health insurance coverage is a major determinant of access to health care in the United States as individuals without insurance are less likely to have a regular source of health care than their insured counterparts. Different health insurance plans and benefits also influence patients’ access to health care. Data on the association of health insurance and the uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for cancer risk are limited. Using data from the National Health Interview Survey, we examined the uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk by health insurance type. We found that only a small proportion of women undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk (2.3%), even among subgroups of women at risk due to family or personal history (6.5%). Women with health insurance were more likely to undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for breast/ovarian cancer risk, particularly those with military and private insurance plans, than those without health insurance after adjusting for various demographic, socioeconomic, and health risk covariates. Further investigations are needed to examine potential disparities in access and health inequities.
Collapse
|
16
|
Mansur A, Zhang F, Lu CY. Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Colorectal Cancer by Health Insurance Type. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071146. [PMID: 35887643 PMCID: PMC9317363 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly used in clinical practice to assist with the diagnosis of genetic diseases and/or provide information about disease risk, and genetic counseling supports patient understanding of test results before and/or after genetic testing. Therefore, access to genetic testing and counseling is important for patient care. Health insurance coverage is a major determinant of access to health care in the United States. Uninsured individuals are less likely to have a regular source of health care than their insured counterparts. Different health insurance types and benefits also influence access to health care. Data on the association of health insurance and uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for cancer risk are limited. Using data from the National Health Interview Survey, we examined the uptake of genetic testing and/or counseling for colorectal cancer (CRC) risk by health insurance type. We found that only a small proportion of individuals undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for CRC risk (0.8%), even among subgroups of individuals at risk due to family or personal history (3.7%). Insured individuals were more likely to undergo genetic testing and/or counseling for CRC risk, particularly those with Military and Private insurance plans, after adjusting for various demographic, socioeconomic, and health risk covariates. Further investigations are warranted to examine potential disparities in access and health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fang Zhang
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| | - Christine Y. Lu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-617-867-4989
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agudelo Motta ML, Osorio Ortega DF, Rubio Roa AC, Beltrán Casas OI. Privacidad y confidencialidad de los datos genéticos y genómicos de uso diagnóstico en Colombia. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE BIOÉTICA 2022. [DOI: 10.18359/rlbi.5196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
La información genética y genómica requiere regulaciones estrictas para su manejo adecuado con el fin de evitar la divulgación inapropiada y la discriminación secundaria, pues tiene una relación directa con los derechos fundamentales y los principios bioéticos. De ahí la necesidad de evaluar la regulación colombiana existente, por lo que se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura en bases de datos del 2000 al 2020, sitios web del Congreso de la República de Colombia, la Comisión de Reforma de la Ley Australiana y la Corte Constitucional de Colombia, para identificar las falencias y los aciertos en la jurisprudencia actual del manejo, el control y la accesibilidad de la población colombiana a las pruebas e información genética. Se toma como referente Australia para comprender y plantear mejoras. Se encontró que en Colombia la información genética se cataloga como sensible (Sentencia C-334-10) con regulaciones inespecíficas sin norma legislativa. En contraste, Australia dispone de directrices bioéticas específicas, penalización y protocolos que abarcan las implicaciones individuales y colectivas descritas en el Privacy Legislation Amendment Act del 2006. Es necesario que en Colombia se cree una regulación jurídica específica para la información genética y genómica con énfasis en pautas de uso sobre la privacidad, la divulgación y la no discriminación.
Collapse
|
18
|
Clinical non-effectiveness of clopidogrel use for peripheral artery disease in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:1217-1225. [PMID: 35657416 PMCID: PMC9283278 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03346-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review to identify studies that assessed the association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients who took clopidogrel. METHODS We systematically searched Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science from November 1997 (inception) to September 2020. We included observational studies evaluating how CYP2C19 polymorphism is associated with clopidogrel's effectiveness and safety among patients with PAD. We extracted relevant information details from eligible studies (e.g., study type, patient population, study outcomes). We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool to assess the risk of bias for included observational studies. RESULTS The outcomes of interest were the effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel. The effectiveness outcomes included clinical ineffectiveness (e.g., restenosis). The safety outcomes included bleeding and death related to the use of clopidogrel. We identified four observational studies with a sample size ranging from 50 to 278. Outcomes and comparison groups of the studies varied. Three studies (75%) had an overall low risk of bias. All included studies demonstrated that carrying CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles was significantly associated with reduced clinical effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review showed an association between CYP2C19 LOF alleles and reduced functions of clopidogrel. The use of CYP2C19 testing in PAD patients prescribed clopidogrel may help improve the clinical outcomes. However, based on the limited evidence, there is a need for randomized clinical trials in PAD patients to test both the effectiveness and safety outcomes of clopidogrel.
Collapse
|
19
|
Bos W, Bunnik EM. Informed consent practices for exome sequencing: An interview study with clinical geneticists in the Netherlands. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022; 10:e1882. [PMID: 35150093 PMCID: PMC8922961 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic sequencing is being used more frequently in the clinic, not only by clinical geneticists, but also by other specialists ("mainstreaming"). The use of genomic sequencing gives rise to challenges regarding informed consent, as it can yield more, and more complex results. METHODS This study maps the informed consent process for exome sequencing in the Netherlands by means of semistructured interviews with 14 clinical geneticists. Interviewees were asked about their strategies for informing patients about exome sequencing and supporting patients in their decision making, about what they think of as essential information elements, about the challenges they experience, and about their preferences for future policy and practice. RESULTS Clinical geneticists typically discuss the following topics: the nature and aim of the test, the possible results (including unsolicited or incidental findings and Variants of Uncertain Significance) of the test and the consequences of those results for the patient and their family members. Some clinical geneticists use a layered approach to informed consent, meaning that they give short and concise information at first, and provide more detailed information depending on the situation or the needs of the patient. CONCLUSION During pre-test counseling for genomic sequencing, clinical geneticists use various strategies to enhance patient understanding and personalization of the informed consent process. Going forward, layering information may be part of a solution to ethical challenges of informed consent, also in mainstream settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Bos
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of MedicineErasmus MC, University Medical Centre RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Eline M. Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of MedicineErasmus MC, University Medical Centre RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Karlsson Linnér R, Koellinger PD. Genetic risk scores in life insurance underwriting. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2022; 81:102556. [PMID: 34847443 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Genetic tests that predict the lifetime risk of common medical conditions are fast becoming more accurate and affordable. The life insurance industry is interested in using predictive genetic tests in the underwriting process, but more research is needed to establish whether this nascent form of genetic testing can refine the process over conventional underwriting factors. Here, we perform Cox regression of survival on a battery of genetic risk scores for common medical conditions and mortality risks in the Health and Retirement Study, without returning results to participants. Adjusted for covariates in a relevant insurance scenario, the scores could improve mortality risk classification by identifying 2.6 years shorter median lifespan in the highest decile of total genetic liability. We conclude that existing genetic risk scores can already improve life insurance underwriting, which stresses the urgency of policymakers to balance competing interests between stakeholders as this technology develops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Karlsson Linnér
- School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081HV, the Netherlands; Department of Economics, Leiden University, Steenschuur 25, Leiden 2531ES, the Netherlands.
| | - Philipp D Koellinger
- School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081HV, the Netherlands; La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA..
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prince AE, Uhlmann WR, Suter SM, Scherer AM. Genetic testing and insurance implications: Surveying the US general population about discrimination concerns and knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE REVIEW 2021; 24:341-365. [PMID: 35663290 PMCID: PMC9165621 DOI: 10.1111/rmir.12195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Globally, due to public concerns of genetic discrimination, some countries and insurance industries have adopted policies restricting insurer use of genetic information, such as the US Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This study reports on combined analysis of two surveys assessing public knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination in a diverse U.S. sample (N=1616). We focus on whether occupation, genetic testing history, and insurance status are correlated with knowledge of GINA or concerns of discrimination. While bivariate analysis identified some populations with higher subjective/objective knowledge and concern relative to counterparts, multivariable regression identified very few significant associations with outcomes of interest. Overall, this study highlights lack of awareness and understanding of GINA, even among subpopulations hypothesized to have greater knowledge of the law. These findings have implications for the broader debate around insurer use of genetic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wendy R. Uhlmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine; Department of Human Genetics; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wauters A, Van Hoyweghen I. Normalising life at risk of Huntington's disease. A qualitative study of backgrounds and coping strategies of fears of genetic discrimination. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:940-948. [PMID: 33594260 PMCID: PMC8187417 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00822-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies in the sociology of genetics have shown how living with a predisposition to a genetic disorder often comes with significant psycho-social burdens and struggles. One of these struggles is the fear of genetic discrimination. Despite genetic non-discrimination regulations, research shows people still worry about being subjected to genetic discrimination. This article adds to this existing body of literature by showing why people still worry about genetic discrimination and how they cope with these worries. Our findings derive from an analysis of semi-structured, in-depth interviews with individuals at risk for Huntington's disease (HD) in Belgium. Concerns of genetic discrimination are grounded in the participants' family backgrounds. Our participants, having witnessed numerous events in which symptomatic relatives suffered discrimination and stigmatisation, expressed heightened fears of facing genetic discrimination. Further, this article provides insight into the strategies participants use to cope with these fears. Two ways of normalising life were identified-while some persist in keeping their genetic risk a secret, other participants explicitly choose to be transparent about their genetic risk, desiring a level of openness. However, while they want to 'break' with their family background, participants who choose to be open are still held back by their worries about genetic discrimination by organisational actors. 'Normalising genetics' appears to be particularly challenging considering the remaining stereotypes and stigma surrounding genetic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annet Wauters
- Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 45 - 3601, Parkstraat, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| | - Ine Van Hoyweghen
- Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 45 - 3601, Parkstraat, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing among Jordanians: An approach towards genomic medicine. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28:3989-3999. [PMID: 34220256 PMCID: PMC8241592 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The twenty first century can be called the genomic era referring to the rapid development of genetics, and the beginning of genomic medicine. An initial step towards genomic medicine is to evaluate the knowledge and attitude towards genetic testing among different populations. The aims of this study were to assess the genetic knowledge and attitude towards genetic testing among the Jordanian population and patients with immune diseases. In addition, we evaluated the association between knowledge, attitude and several demographic factors of the population. Methods This study was performed using an online questionnaire that was distributed to respondents from different regions of Jordan. Results A total of 1149 participants were recruited from the Jordanian population. Overall factual genetic knowledge of the participants was good (65.4%), with education level, working or studying in a health-related field and household average monthly income being significant predictors of factual knowledge scores (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, factual knowledge results revealed that scores of questions related to diseases were significantly higher than scores of gene-related scientific facts (P < 0.01). Participants of our study reported to have low perceived knowledge on medical uses (39.5%) and social consequences (23.9%) of genetic testing. Regarding the participants’ attitudes, favorable attitudes towards genetic testing were prevailing (91.5%). Favorable attitudes were more prominent among higher educated participants, and participants with higher scores of factual knowledge. Conclusion Despite the fact that our Jordanian-based study revealed a good level of genetic knowledge as well as a favorable attitude towards genetic testing, we realized an imbalance of knowledge between gene-related scientific facts and disease-related concepts as well as between factual and perceived genetic knowledge, which indicates the necessity of increasing the awareness about genetic testing in order to ensure that individuals can take informed decisions that help in the employment of personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kotanidis CP, Antoniades C. Selfies in cardiovascular medicine: welcome to a new era of medical diagnostics. Eur Heart J 2021; 41:4412-4414. [PMID: 32822487 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos P Kotanidis
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Charalambos Antoniades
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beriault DR, Gilmour JA, Hicks LK. Overutilization in laboratory medicine: tackling the problem with quality improvement science. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2021; 58:430-446. [PMID: 33691585 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2021.1893642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Overutilization of tests and treatments is a widespread problem in contemporary heath care, and laboratory medicine is no exception. It is estimated that 10-70% of laboratory tests may be unnecessary, with estimates in the literature varying depending on the situation and the laboratory test. Inappropriate use of laboratory tests can lead to further unnecessary testing, adverse events, inaccurate diagnoses, and inappropriate treatments. Altogether, this increases the risk of harm to a patient, which can be physical, psychological, or financial in nature. Overutilization in healthcare is driven by complex factors including care delivery models, litigious practice environments, and medical and patient culture. Quality improvement (QI) methods can help to tackle overutilization. In this review, we outline the global healthcare problem of laboratory overutilization, particularly in the developed world, and describe how an understanding of and application of quality improvement principles can help to address this challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Beriault
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julie A Gilmour
- Division of Endocrinology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa K Hicks
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McInerney-Leo AM, Duncan EL. Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 11:628946. [PMID: 33679611 PMCID: PMC7933540 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.628946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There have been two major eras in the history of gene discovery. The first was the era of linkage analysis, with approximately 1,300 disease-related genes identified by positional cloning by the turn of the millennium. The second era has been powered by two major breakthroughs: the publication of the human genome and the development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). MPS has greatly accelerated disease gene identification, such that disease genes that would have taken years to map previously can now be determined in a matter of weeks. Additionally, the number of affected families needed to map a causative gene and the size of such families have fallen: de novo mutations, previously intractable by linkage analysis, can be identified through sequencing of the parent-child trio, and genes for recessive disease can be identified through MPS even of a single affected individual. MPS technologies include whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS), and panel sequencing, each with their strengths. While WES has been responsible for most gene discoveries through MPS, WGS is superior in detecting copy number variants, chromosomal rearrangements, and repeat-rich regions. Panels are commonly used for diagnostic purposes as they are extremely cost-effective and generate manageable quantities of data, with no risk of unexpected findings. However, in instances of diagnostic uncertainty, it can be challenging to choose the right panel, and in these circumstances WES has a higher diagnostic yield. MPS has ethical, social, and legal implications, many of which are common to genetic testing generally but amplified due to the magnitude of data (e.g., relationship misattribution, identification of variants of uncertain significance, and genetic discrimination); others are unique to WES and WGS technologies (e.g., incidental or secondary findings). Nonetheless, MPS is rapidly translating into clinical practice as an extremely useful part of the clinical armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aideen M. McInerney-Leo
- Dermatology Research Centre, University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emma L. Duncan
- Department of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kawasaki H, Kawasaki M, Iki T, Matsuyama R. Genetics education program to help public health nurses improve their knowledge and enhance communities' genetic literacy: a pilot study. BMC Nurs 2021; 20:31. [PMID: 33579269 PMCID: PMC7881575 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00549-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As human genetics knowledge develops, public genetic literacy needs to be increased, though the educational capacity for this purpose has not yet been fully developed. Under this circumstance, the daily work of public health nurses can be viewed as an opportunity to enhance public genetic literacy. However, in Japan, there is not only a lack of public knowledge of human genomics but also a lack of public health nurses' recognition about genomic literacy. A short-term education program was implemented as a pilot study. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the program to support public health nurses' activity aimed at promoting health services-related genetic literacy. METHODS The genetics education program was implemented in December 2019, in Kagoshima, Japan. Twenty-three public health nurses cooperated with the research. The program was composed of a case study on consultation, a lecture on hereditary diseases, and a discussion on the role of public health nurses. Familial hypercholesterolemia was used as the topic of the case study. We evaluated scores for cognition, affect, and psychomotor characteristics related to their learning goals before and after the program using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Answers in the consultation were qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS The mean cognitive score, capturing provision of explanations of hereditary disease, was 6.3 before the program but increased significantly to 9.3 after the program (p < 0.001). For the affective score, the goal of which was deepening interest in human genetics, the mean score increased significantly from 8.5 before to 11.0 after (p < 0.001). For the psychomotor score, addressing the need for genetic consultation, the mean score increased significantly from 4.4 before to 8.1 after (p < 0.001). Prominent themes extracted from descriptions on the worksheet post training included, "providing advice and accurate information on genetic disorders" and "referral to a specialized organization." CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicated that this education program helps public health nurses be positively involved in human genetic disorders. Thus, they may connect to their local community to provide accurate genetics knowledge and advice for health management and promoting genetic literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromi Kawasaki
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Kawasaki
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan
| | - Tomoko Iki
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan
| | - Ryota Matsuyama
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Wahrman MZ, Garcia P, Basch CE. DNA testing information on YouTube: Inadequate advice can mislead and harm the public. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:785-792. [PMID: 33382174 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA (i.e., genetic) testing has become very popular, with close to 30 million Americans having used these services. The 100 most widely viewed DNA YouTube testing videos were analyzed to determine whether they are providing adequate information for consumers. The top 100 videos had more than 300 million cumulative views, showing the popularity and reach of the information source. While many videos addressed the specimen collection process, family roots and ancestry, and the prospect of uncovering unexpected information about family or health leading to possible distress, almost none of the videos addressed accuracy or confidentiality issues, which are major issues of DNA testing. It is recommended that further information on those issues be made readily available, and more vigilant oversight by regulatory agencies be implemented. Such oversight should include monitoring what information is and is not readily provided by each company, and the veracity of information being communicated to existing and prospective consumers. We also recommend that for medical issues, clinical genetic testing, along with genetic counseling by genetic counselors, be the method of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey H Basch
- Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Grace C Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miryam Z Wahrman
- Department of Biology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Philip Garcia
- Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA
| | - Charles E Basch
- Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Blasimme A, Brall C, Vayena E. Reporting Genetic Findings to Individual Research Participants: Guidelines From the Swiss Personalized Health Network. Front Genet 2020; 11:585820. [PMID: 33362850 PMCID: PMC7759560 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.585820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2017 the Swiss federal government established the Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN), a nationally coordinated data infrastructure for genetic research. The SPHN advisory group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) was tasked with the creation of a recommendation to ensure ethically responsible reporting of genetic research findings to research participants in SPHN-funded studies. Following consultations with expert stakeholders, including geneticists, pediatricians, sociologists, university hospitals directors, patient representatives, consumer protection associations, and insurers, the ELSI advisory group issued its recommendation on "Reporting actionable genetic findings to research participants" in May 2020. In this paper we outline the development of this recommendation and the provisions it contains. In particular, we discuss some of its key features, namely: (1) that participation in SPHN-funded studies as a research subject is conditional to accepting that medically relevant genetic research findings will be reported; (2) that a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP) should be created to support researchers' decision-making processes about reporting individual genetic research findings; (3) that such Multidisciplinary Expert Panel will make case-by-case decisions about whether to allow reporting of genetic findings, instead of relying on a pre-defined list of medically relevant variants; (4) that research participants shall be informed of the need to disclose genetic mutations when applying for private insurance, which may influence individual decisions about participation in research. By providing an account of the procedural background and considerations leading to the SPHN recommendation on "Reporting actionable genetic findings to research participants," we seek to promote a better understanding of the proposed guidance, as well as to contribute to the global dialog on the reporting of genetic research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Brall
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Advisory Group, Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Advisory Group, Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN), Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hendricks-Sturrup RM, Cerminara KL, Lu CY. A Qualitative Study to Develop a Privacy and Nondiscrimination Best Practice Framework for Personalized Wellness Programs. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040264. [PMID: 33287396 PMCID: PMC7761887 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Employers in the United States (US) increasingly offer personalized wellness products as a workplace benefit. In doing so, those employers must be cognizant of not only US law but also European Union (EU) law to the extent that the EU law applies to European immigrants or guest workers in the US. To the extent that wellness programs are implemented in either public health or employment contexts within the US and/or EU, sponsors of these programs can partner with direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies and other digital health companies to generate, collect, and process sensitive health information that are loosely or partially regulated from a privacy and nondiscrimination standpoint. Balancing claims about the benefits of wellness programs are concerns about employee health privacy and discrimination and the current unregulated nature of consumer health data. We qualitatively explored the concerns and opinions of public and legislative stakeholders in the US to determine key themes and develop privacy and nondiscrimination best practices. Key themes emerged as promoting a culture of trust and wellness. Best practices within these themes were: (1) have transparent and prominent data standards and practices, (2) uphold employee privacy and nondiscrimination standards, (3) remove penalties associated with biometric outcomes and nondisclosure of sensitive health information, (4) reward healthy behavior regardless of biometric outcomes, and (5) make program benefits accessible regardless of personal status. Employers, DTC genetic testing companies, policymakers, and stakeholders broadly should consider these themes and best practices in the current absence of broad regulations on nondiscriminatory workplace wellness programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachele M. Hendricks-Sturrup
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-617-867-4274
| | - Kathy L. Cerminara
- Shepard Broad College of Law, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA;
| | - Christine Y. Lu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Systematic review and evaluation of predictive modeling algorithms in spinal surgeries. J Neurol Sci 2020; 420:117184. [PMID: 33203588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In order to better educate patients, predictive models have been implemented to stratify surgical risk, thereby instituting greater uniformity across surgical practices and prioritizing the safety and outcomes of patients. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review summarizing the major predictive models used to evaluate patients as candidates for spinal surgery. A search was conducted for articles related to predictive modeling in spinal surgeries using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. Papers with area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) scores reported were included in the analysis. Models not relevant to spinal procedures were excluded. Comparison between models was only attainable for those that reported AUROCs for individual procedures. Based on a combination of AUROC scores and demonstrated applicability to spinal procedures, the models by Scheer et al. (0.89), Ratliff et al. (0.70), the Seattle Spine Score (0.712), Risk Assessment Tool (0.67-0.7), and the Spine Sage calculator (0.81-0.85) were determined to be ideal for predictive modeling in spinal surgeries and were subsequently broken down into their individual inputs and outputs to determine what elements a theoretical model should assimilate. Alongside the model by Scheer et al., the Spine Sage calculator, Seattle Spine Score, Risk Assessment Tool, and a model by Ratliff et al. showed the most promise for patients undergoing spinal procedures. Using the first model as a springboard, new spinal predictive models can be optimized through use of larger prospective databases, with longer follow-up times, and greater inclusion of reliable high impact variables.
Collapse
|
32
|
Yuen J, Fung SM, Sia CL, Venkatramani M, Shaw T, Courtney E, Li ST, Chiang J, Tan VKM, Tan BKT, Ngeow J. An in-depth exploration of the post-test informational needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2020; 18:22. [PMID: 33110458 PMCID: PMC7585213 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-00154-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Identification of one's status as a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carrier often marks the start of navigating challenging decisions related to cancer risk management and result disclosure. Carriers report unmet informational needs, but studies have yet to explore the specific aspects of and how best to fulfill these needs. This study aims to explore the informational needs of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia to inform for the design of educational materials to support risk management decision-making. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with two male and 22 female English-speaking BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, aged 29-66 years, identified through the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. A grounded theory approach with thematic analysis was undertaken to extract dominant themes. Results Four themes were identified: (i) proactive online information seeking behaviors (ii) personalized informational needs; (iii) challenges in sharing the results; and (iv) lack of genetic awareness. Discussion Participants highlight challenges with sharing their result arising from significant post-result informational needs, which have manifested into proactive online information-seeking behaviors. They desire for an online source of information, where content is personalized, reliable and local. Participants foresee the potential of an online resource to raise genetic awareness. This suggests the use of a culturally tailored online-based genetics resource, to promote result disclosure, empower risk-management decisions and raise genetic literacy rates. Supplementary information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13053-020-00154-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Yuen
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Si Ming Fung
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin Leong Sia
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Drive, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mallika Venkatramani
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tarryn Shaw
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eliza Courtney
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shao-Tzu Li
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jianbang Chiang
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan
- Singhealth-Duke NUS Breast Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Singhealth-Duke NUS Breast Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Drive, Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hays T, Groopman EE, Gharavi AG. Genetic testing for kidney disease of unknown etiology. Kidney Int 2020; 98:590-600. [PMID: 32739203 PMCID: PMC7784921 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In many cases of chronic kidney disease, the cause of disease remains unknown despite a thorough nephrologic workup. Genetic testing has revolutionized many areas of medicine and promises to empower diagnosis and targeted management of such cases of kidney disease of unknown etiology. Recent studies using genetic testing have demonstrated that Mendelian etiologies account for approximately 20% of cases of kidney disease of unknown etiology. Although genetic testing has significant benefits, including tailoring of therapy, informing targeted workup, detecting extrarenal disease, counseling patients and families, and redirecting care, it also has important limitations and risks that must be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hays
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology and Perinatology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emily E Groopman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ali G Gharavi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA; Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA; Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Joly Y, Dupras C, Pinkesz M, Tovino SA, Rothstein MA. Looking Beyond GINA: Policy Approaches to Address Genetic Discrimination. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2020; 21:491-507. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111119-011436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Concerns about genetic discrimination (GD) often surface when discussing research and innovation in genetics. Over recent decades, countries around the world have attempted to address GD using various policy measures. In this article, we survey these approaches and provide a critical commentary on their advantages and disadvantages. Our examination begins with regions featuring extensive policy-making activities (North America and Europe), followed by regions with moderate policy-making activities (Australia, Asia, and South America) and regions with minimal policy-making activities (the Middle East and Africa). Our analysis then turns to emerging issues regarding genetic testing and GD, including the expansion of multiomics sciences and direct-to-consumer genetic tests outside the health context. We additionally survey the shortcomings of current normative approaches addressing GD. Finally, we conclude by highlighting the evolving nature of GD and the need for more innovative policy-making in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Charles Dupras
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Miriam Pinkesz
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Stacey A. Tovino
- William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA
| | - Mark A. Rothstein
- Brandeis School of Law and School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bunnik EM, Timmers M, Bolt IL. Ethical Issues in Research and Development of Epigenome-wide Technologies. Epigenet Insights 2020; 13:2516865720913253. [PMID: 32313869 PMCID: PMC7154555 DOI: 10.1177/2516865720913253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, few scholarly discussions on ethical implications of epigenetics and epigenomics technologies have focused on the current phase of research and development, in which researchers are confronted with real and practical ethical dilemmas. In this article, a responsible research and innovation approach, using interviews and an expert meeting, is applied to a case of epigenomic test development for cervical cancer screening. This article provides an overview of ethical issues presently facing epigenomics researchers and test developers, and discusses 3 sets of issues in depth: (1) informed consent; (2) communication with donors and/or research participants, and (3) privacy and publication of data and research results. Although these issues are familiar to research ethics, some aspects are new and most require reinterpretation in the context of epigenomics technologies. With this article, we aim to start a discussion of the practical ethical issues rising in research and development of epigenomic technologies and to offer guidance for researchers working in the field of epigenetic and epigenomic technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Timmers
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke Lle Bolt
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Edge MD, Coop G. Attacks on genetic privacy via uploads to genealogical databases. eLife 2020; 9:51810. [PMID: 31908268 PMCID: PMC6992384 DOI: 10.7554/elife.51810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetics services are increasingly popular, with tens of millions of customers. Several DTC genealogy services allow users to upload genetic data to search for relatives, identified as people with genomes that share identical by state (IBS) regions. Here, we describe methods by which an adversary can learn database genotypes by uploading multiple datasets. For example, an adversary who uploads approximately 900 genomes could recover at least one allele at SNP sites across up to 82% of the genome of a median person of European ancestries. In databases that detect IBS segments using unphased genotypes, approximately 100 falsified uploads can reveal enough genetic information to allow genome-wide genetic imputation. We provide a proof-of-concept demonstration in the GEDmatch database, and we suggest countermeasures that will prevent the exploits we describe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Edge
- Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.,Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.,Quantitative and Computational Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Graham Coop
- Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.,Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lovis C. Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Medicine. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e16607. [PMID: 31702565 PMCID: PMC6874800 DOI: 10.2196/16607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Data-driven science and its corollaries in machine learning and the wider field of artificial intelligence have the potential to drive important changes in medicine. However, medicine is not a science like any other: It is deeply and tightly bound with a large and wide network of legal, ethical, regulatory, economical, and societal dependencies. As a consequence, the scientific and technological progresses in handling information and its further processing and cross-linking for decision support and predictive systems must be accompanied by parallel changes in the global environment, with numerous stakeholders, including citizen and society. What can be seen at the first glance as a barrier and a mechanism slowing down the progression of data science must, however, be considered an important asset. Only global adoption can transform the potential of big data and artificial intelligence into an effective breakthroughs in handling health and medicine. This requires science and society, scientists and citizens, to progress together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Lovis
- Division of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|