1
|
de Boisredon d'Assier MA, Portafaix A, Vorontsov E, Le WT, Kadoury S. Image-level supervision and self-training for transformer-based cross-modality tumor segmentation. Med Image Anal 2024; 97:103287. [PMID: 39111265 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/30/2024]
Abstract
Deep neural networks are commonly used for automated medical image segmentation, but models will frequently struggle to generalize well across different imaging modalities. This issue is particularly problematic due to the limited availability of annotated data, both in the target as well as the source modality, making it difficult to deploy these models on a larger scale. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new semi-supervised training strategy called MoDATTS. Our approach is designed for accurate cross-modality 3D tumor segmentation on unpaired bi-modal datasets. An image-to-image translation strategy between modalities is used to produce synthetic but annotated images and labels in the desired modality and improve generalization to the unannotated target modality. We also use powerful vision transformer architectures for both image translation (TransUNet) and segmentation (Medformer) tasks and introduce an iterative self-training procedure in the later task to further close the domain gap between modalities, thus also training on unlabeled images in the target modality. MoDATTS additionally allows the possibility to exploit image-level labels with a semi-supervised objective that encourages the model to disentangle tumors from the background. This semi-supervised methodology helps in particular to maintain downstream segmentation performance when pixel-level label scarcity is also present in the source modality dataset, or when the source dataset contains healthy controls. The proposed model achieves superior performance compared to other methods from participating teams in the CrossMoDA 2022 vestibular schwannoma (VS) segmentation challenge, as evidenced by its reported top Dice score of 0.87±0.04 for the VS segmentation. MoDATTS also yields consistent improvements in Dice scores over baselines on a cross-modality adult brain gliomas segmentation task composed of four different contrasts from the BraTS 2020 challenge dataset, where 95% of a target supervised model performance is reached when no target modality annotations are available. We report that 99% and 100% of this maximum performance can be attained if 20% and 50% of the target data is additionally annotated, which further demonstrates that MoDATTS can be leveraged to reduce the annotation burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aloys Portafaix
- Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - William Trung Le
- Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhadra S, Liu J, Summers RM. Subcutaneous edema segmentation on abdominal CT using multi-class labels and iterative annotation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2024:10.1007/s11548-024-03262-4. [PMID: 39271574 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03262-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anasarca is a condition that results from organ dysfunctions, such as heart, kidney, or liver failure, characterized by the presence of edema throughout the body. The quantification of accumulated edema may have potential clinical benefits. This work focuses on accurately estimating the amount of edema non-invasively using abdominal CT scans, with minimal false positives. However, edema segmentation is challenging due to the complex appearance of edema and the lack of manually annotated volumes. METHODS We propose a weakly supervised approach for edema segmentation using initial edema labels from the current state-of-the-art method for edema segmentation (Intensity Prior), along with labels of surrounding tissues as anatomical priors. A multi-class 3D nnU-Net was employed as the segmentation network, and training was performed using an iterative annotation workflow. RESULTS We evaluated segmentation accuracy on a test set of 25 patients with edema. The average Dice Similarity Coefficient of the proposed method was similar to Intensity Prior (61.5% vs. 61.7%; p = 0.83 ). However, the proposed method reduced the average False Positive Rate significantly, from 1.8% to 1.1% ( p < 0.001 ). Edema volumes computed using automated segmentation had a strong correlation with manual annotation (R 2 = 0.87 ). CONCLUSION Weakly supervised learning using 3D multi-class labels and iterative annotation is an efficient way to perform high-quality edema segmentation with minimal false positives. Automated edema segmentation can produce edema volume estimates that are highly correlated with manual annotation. The proposed approach is promising for clinical applications to monitor anasarca using estimated edema volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantan Bhadra
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland, USA
| | - Jianfei Liu
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland, USA
| | - Ronald M Summers
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 20892, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wirth W, Maschek S, Wisser A, Eder J, Baumgartner CF, Chaudhari A, Berenbaum F, Eckstein F. Evaluation of an automated laminar cartilage T2 relaxation time analysis method in an early osteoarthritis model. Skeletal Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00256-024-04786-1. [PMID: 39230576 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04786-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A fully automated laminar cartilage composition (MRI-based T2) analysis method was technically and clinically validated by comparing radiographically normal knees with (CL-JSN) and without contra-lateral joint space narrowing or other signs of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA, CL-noROA). MATERIALS AND METHODS 2D U-Nets were trained from manually segmented femorotibial cartilages (n = 72) from all 7 echoes (AllE), or from the 1st echo only (1stE) of multi-echo-spin-echo (MESE) MRIs acquired by the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Because of its greater accuracy, only the AllE U-Net was then applied to knees from the OAI healthy reference cohort (n = 10), CL-JSN (n = 39), and (1:1) matched CL-noROA knees (n = 39) that all had manual expert segmentation, and to 982 non-matched CL-noROA knees without expert segmentation. RESULTS The agreement (Dice similarity coefficient) between automated vs. manual expert cartilage segmentation was between 0.82 ± 0.05/0.79 ± 0.06 (AllE/1stE) and 0.88 ± 0.03/0.88 ± 0.03 (AllE/1stE) across femorotibial cartilage plates. The deviation between automated vs. manually derived laminar T2 reached up to - 2.2 ± 2.6 ms/ + 4.1 ± 10.2 ms (AllE/1stE). The AllE U-Net showed a similar sensitivity to cross-sectional laminar T2 differences between CL-JSN and CL-noROA knees in the matched (Cohen's D ≤ 0.54) and the non-matched (D ≤ 0.54) comparison as the matched manual analyses (D ≤ 0.48). Longitudinally, the AllE U-Net also showed a similar sensitivity to CL-JSN vs. CS-noROA differences in the matched (D ≤ 0.51) and the non-matched (D ≤ 0.43) comparison as matched manual analyses (D ≤ 0.41). CONCLUSION The fully automated T2 analysis showed a high agreement, acceptable accuracy, and similar sensitivity to cross-sectional and longitudinal laminar T2 differences in an early OA model, compared with manual expert analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identification: NCT00080171.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Wirth
- Chondrometrics GmbH, Freilassing, Germany.
- Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Institute of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Center of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
- Ludwig Boltzmann Inst. for Arthritis and Rehabilitation (LBIAR), Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Susanne Maschek
- Chondrometrics GmbH, Freilassing, Germany
- Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Institute of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Center of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Anna Wisser
- Chondrometrics GmbH, Freilassing, Germany
- Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Institute of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Center of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Inst. for Arthritis and Rehabilitation (LBIAR), Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jana Eder
- Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Institute of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Center of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | - Francis Berenbaum
- , 4Moving Biotech, Lille, France
- Department of Rheumatology, AP-HP Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP Saint-Antoine Hospital, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Felix Eckstein
- Chondrometrics GmbH, Freilassing, Germany
- Research Program for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Institute of Imaging & Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Center of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Inst. for Arthritis and Rehabilitation (LBIAR), Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chierici A, Lareyre F, Salucki B, Iannelli A, Delingette H, Raffort J. Vascular liver segmentation: a narrative review on methods and new insights brought by artificial intelligence. J Int Med Res 2024; 52:3000605241263170. [PMID: 39291427 PMCID: PMC11418557 DOI: 10.1177/03000605241263170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver vessel segmentation from routinely performed medical imaging is a useful tool for diagnosis, treatment planning and delivery, and prognosis evaluation for many diseases, particularly liver cancer. A precise representation of liver anatomy is crucial to define the extent of the disease and, when suitable, the consequent resective or ablative procedure, in order to guarantee a radical treatment without sacrificing an excessive volume of healthy liver. Once mainly performed manually, with notable cost in terms of time and human energies, vessel segmentation is currently realized through the application of artificial intelligence (AI), which has gained increased interest and development of the field. Many different AI-driven models adopted for this aim have been described and can be grouped into different categories: thresholding methods, edge- and region-based methods, model-based methods, and machine learning models. The latter includes neural network and deep learning models that now represent the principal algorithms exploited for vessel segmentation. The present narrative review describes how liver vessel segmentation can be realized through AI models, with a summary of model results in terms of accuracy, and an overview on the future progress of this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Chierici
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of Antibes Juan-les-Pins, Antibes, France
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inria, Epione Team, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Fabien Lareyre
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Antibes Juan-les-Pins, Antibes, France
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France
| | - Benjamin Salucki
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of Antibes Juan-les-Pins, Antibes, France
| | - Antonio Iannelli
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm U1065, Team 8 “Hepatic complications of obesity and alcohol”, Nice, France
- ADIPOCIBLE Study Group, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Hervé Delingette
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inria, Epione Team, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Juliette Raffort
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
- 3IA Institute, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holzschuh JC, Mix M, Freitag MT, Hölscher T, Braune A, Kotzerke J, Vrachimis A, Doolan P, Ilhan H, Marinescu IM, Spohn SKB, Fechter T, Kuhn D, Gratzke C, Grosu R, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. The impact of multicentric datasets for the automated tumor delineation in primary prostate cancer using convolutional neural networks on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:106. [PMID: 39113123 PMCID: PMC11304577 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02491-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have emerged as transformative tools in the field of radiation oncology, significantly advancing the precision of contouring practices. However, the adaptability of these algorithms across diverse scanners, institutions, and imaging protocols remains a considerable obstacle. This study aims to investigate the effects of incorporating institution-specific datasets into the training regimen of CNNs to assess their generalization ability in real-world clinical environments. Focusing on a data-centric analysis, the influence of varying multi- and single center training approaches on algorithm performance is conducted. METHODS nnU-Net is trained using a dataset comprising 161 18F-PSMA-1007 PET images collected from four distinct institutions (Freiburg: n = 96, Munich: n = 19, Cyprus: n = 32, Dresden: n = 14). The dataset is partitioned such that data from each center are systematically excluded from training and used solely for testing to assess the model's generalizability and adaptability to data from unfamiliar sources. Performance is compared through a 5-Fold Cross-Validation, providing a detailed comparison between models trained on datasets from single centers to those trained on aggregated multi-center datasets. Dice Similarity Score, Hausdorff distance and volumetric analysis are used as primary evaluation metrics. RESULTS The mixed training approach yielded a median DSC of 0.76 (IQR: 0.64-0.84) in a five-fold cross-validation, showing no significant differences (p = 0.18) compared to models trained with data exclusion from each center, which performed with a median DSC of 0.74 (IQR: 0.56-0.86). Significant performance improvements regarding multi-center training were observed for the Dresden cohort (multi-center median DSC 0.71, IQR: 0.58-0.80 vs. single-center 0.68, IQR: 0.50-0.80, p < 0.001) and Cyprus cohort (multi-center 0.74, IQR: 0.62-0.83 vs. single-center 0.72, IQR: 0.54-0.82, p < 0.01). While Munich and Freiburg also showed performance improvements with multi-center training, results showed no statistical significance (Munich: multi-center DSC 0.74, IQR: 0.60-0.80 vs. single-center 0.72, IQR: 0.59-0.82, p > 0.05; Freiburg: multi-center 0.78, IQR: 0.53-0.87 vs. single-center 0.71, IQR: 0.53-0.83, p = 0.23). CONCLUSION CNNs trained for auto contouring intraprostatic GTV in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET on a diverse dataset from multiple centers mostly generalize well to unseen data from other centers. Training on a multicentric dataset can improve performance compared to training exclusively with a single-center dataset regarding intraprostatic 18F-PSMA-1007 PET GTV segmentation. The segmentation performance of the same CNN can vary depending on the dataset employed for training and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius C Holzschuh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany.
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin T Freitag
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Braune
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Paul Doolan
- Department of Medical Physics, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Ioana M Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dejan Kuhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Radu Grosu
- Cyber-Physical Systems Division, Institute of Computer Engineering and Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elmalam N, Ben Nedava L, Zaritsky A. In silico labeling in cell biology: Potential and limitations. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2024; 89:102378. [PMID: 38838549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
In silico labeling is the computational cross-modality image translation where the output modality is a subcellular marker that is not specifically encoded in the input image, for example, in silico localization of organelles from transmitted light images. In principle, in silico labeling has the potential to facilitate rapid live imaging of multiple organelles with reduced photobleaching and phototoxicity, a technology enabling a major leap toward understanding the cell as an integrated complex system. However, five years have passed since feasibility was attained, without any demonstration of using in silico labeling to uncover new biological insight. In here, we discuss the current state of in silico labeling, the limitations preventing it from becoming a practical tool, and how we can overcome these limitations to reach its full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitsan Elmalam
- Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Lion Ben Nedava
- Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Assaf Zaritsky
- Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schirmacher D, Armagan Ü, Zhang Y, Kull T, Auler M, Schroeder T. aiSEGcell: User-friendly deep learning-based segmentation of nuclei in transmitted light images. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1012361. [PMID: 39178193 PMCID: PMC11343410 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Segmentation is required to quantify cellular structures in microscopic images. This typically requires their fluorescent labeling. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can detect these structures also in only transmitted light images. This eliminates the need for transgenic or dye fluorescent labeling, frees up imaging channels, reduces phototoxicity and speeds up imaging. However, this approach currently requires optimized experimental conditions and computational specialists. Here, we introduce "aiSEGcell" a user-friendly CNN-based software to segment nuclei and cells in bright field images. We extensively evaluated it for nucleus segmentation in different primary cell types in 2D cultures from different imaging modalities in hand-curated published and novel imaging data sets. We provide this curated ground-truth data with 1.1 million nuclei in 20,000 images. aiSEGcell accurately segments nuclei from even challenging bright field images, very similar to manual segmentation. It retains biologically relevant information, e.g. for demanding quantification of noisy biosensors reporting signaling pathway activity dynamics. aiSEGcell is readily adaptable to new use cases with only 32 images required for retraining. aiSEGcell is accessible through both a command line, and a napari graphical user interface. It is agnostic to computational environments and does not require user expert coding experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Schirmacher
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ümmünur Armagan
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kull
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Markus Auler
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Timm Schroeder
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hernandez M, Ramon Julvez U. Insights into traditional Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping and unsupervised deep-learning for diffeomorphic registration and their evaluation. Comput Biol Med 2024; 178:108761. [PMID: 38908357 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
This paper explores the connections between traditional Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping methods and unsupervised deep-learning approaches for non-rigid registration, particularly emphasizing diffeomorphic registration. The study provides useful insights and establishes connections between the methods, thereby facilitating a profound understanding of the methodological landscape. The methods considered in our study are extensively evaluated in T1w MRI images using traditional NIREP and Learn2Reg OASIS evaluation protocols with a focus on fairness, to establish equitable benchmarks and facilitate informed comparisons. Through a comprehensive analysis of the results, we address key questions, including the intricate relationship between accuracy and transformation quality in performance, the disentanglement of the influence of registration ingredients on performance, and the determination of benchmark methods and baselines. We offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of both traditional and deep-learning methods, shedding light on their comparative performance and guiding future advancements in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Hernandez
- Computer Science Department, University of Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Institute on Engineering Research, Spain.
| | - Ubaldo Ramon Julvez
- Computer Science Department, University of Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Institute on Engineering Research, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lucas A, Jaskir M, Sinha N, Pattnaik A, Mouchtaris S, Josyula M, Petillo N, Roth RW, Dikecligil GN, Bonilha L, Gottfried J, Gleichgerrcht E, Das S, Stein JM, Gugger JJ, Davis KA. Connectivity of the Piriform Cortex and its Implications in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.07.21.24310778. [PMID: 39108505 PMCID: PMC11302608 DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.21.24310778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background The piriform cortex has been implicated in the initiation, spread and termination of epileptic seizures. This understanding has extended to surgical management of epilepsy, where it has been shown that resection or ablation of the piriform cortex can result in better outcomes. How and why the piriform cortex may play such a crucial role in seizure networks is not well understood. To answer these questions, we investigated the functional and structural connectivity of the piriform cortex in both healthy controls and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients. Methods We studied a retrospective cohort of 55 drug-resistant unilateral TLE patients and 26 healthy controls who received structural and functional neuroimaging. Using seed-to-voxel connectivity we compared the normative whole-brain connectivity of the piriform to that of the hippocampus, a region commonly involved in epilepsy, to understand the differential contribution of the piriform to the epileptogenic network. We subsequently measured the inter-piriform coupling (IPC) to quantify similarities in the inter-hemispheric cortical functional connectivity profile between the two piriform cortices. We related differences in IPC in TLE back to aberrations in normative piriform connectivity, whole brain functional properties, and structural connectivity. Results We find that relative to the hippocampus, the piriform is functionally connected to the anterior insula and the rest of the salience ventral attention network (SAN). We also find that low IPC is a sensitive metric of poor surgical outcome (sensitivity: 85.71%, 95% CI: [19.12%, 99.64%]); and differences in IPC within TLE were related to disconnectivity and hyperconnectivity to the anterior insula and the SAN. More globally, we find that low IPC is associated with whole-brain functional and structural segregation, marked by decreased functional small-worldness and fractional anisotropy. Conclusions Our study presents novel insights into the functional and structural neural network alterations associated with this structure, laying the foundation for future work to carefully consider its connectivity during the presurgical management of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Lucas
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Marc Jaskir
- Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Akash Pattnaik
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Nina Petillo
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandhitsu Das
- Department of Neurology, University of South Carolina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tejani AS, Klontzas ME, Gatti AA, Mongan JT, Moy L, Park SH, Kahn CE. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e240300. [PMID: 38809149 PMCID: PMC11304031 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.240300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
To address the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence in medical imaging, the authors present the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) 2024 Update.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John T. Mongan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.); Department of Radiology, University of
Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (M.E.K.); Department of
Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
(M.E.K.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
(A.A.G.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (J.T.M.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.);
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical
Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.);
and Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University
of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6243 (C.E.K.)
| | - Linda Moy
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.); Department of Radiology, University of
Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (M.E.K.); Department of
Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
(M.E.K.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
(A.A.G.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (J.T.M.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.);
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical
Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.);
and Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University
of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6243 (C.E.K.)
| | - Seong Ho Park
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.); Department of Radiology, University of
Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (M.E.K.); Department of
Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
(M.E.K.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
(A.A.G.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (J.T.M.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.);
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical
Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.);
and Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University
of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6243 (C.E.K.)
| | - Charles E. Kahn
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.); Department of Radiology, University of
Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (M.E.K.); Department of
Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
(M.E.K.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
(A.A.G.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (J.T.M.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.M.);
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical
Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.);
and Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University
of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6243 (C.E.K.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huisman M. When AUC-ROC and accuracy are not accurate: what everyone needs to know about evaluating artificial intelligence in radiology. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10859-5. [PMID: 38913248 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10859-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Huisman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nikiforaki K, Karatzanis I, Dovrou A, Bobowicz M, Gwozdziewicz K, Díaz O, Tsiknakis M, Fotiadis DI, Lekadir K, Marias K. Image Quality Assessment Tool for Conventional and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisitions. J Imaging 2024; 10:115. [PMID: 38786569 PMCID: PMC11122086 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10050115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Image quality assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important factor not only for conventional diagnosis and protocol optimization but also for fairness, trustworthiness, and robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, especially on large heterogeneous datasets. Information on image quality in multi-centric studies is important to complement the contribution profile from each data node along with quantity information, especially when large variability is expected, and certain acceptance criteria apply. The main goal of this work was to present a tool enabling users to assess image quality based on both subjective criteria as well as objective image quality metrics used to support the decision on image quality based on evidence. The evaluation can be performed on both conventional and dynamic MRI acquisition protocols, while the latter is also checked longitudinally across dynamic series. The assessment provides an overall image quality score and information on the types of artifacts and degrading factors as well as a number of objective metrics for automated evaluation across series (BRISQUE score, Total Variation, PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, MS-SSIM). Moreover, the user can define specific regions of interest (ROIs) to calculate the regional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), thus individualizing the quality output to specific use cases, such as tissue-specific contrast or regional noise quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Nikiforaki
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece; (I.K.); (A.D.); (M.T.); (K.M.)
| | - Ioannis Karatzanis
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece; (I.K.); (A.D.); (M.T.); (K.M.)
| | - Aikaterini Dovrou
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece; (I.K.); (A.D.); (M.T.); (K.M.)
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maciej Bobowicz
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (M.B.); (K.G.)
| | - Katarzyna Gwozdziewicz
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland; (M.B.); (K.G.)
| | - Oliver Díaz
- Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain; (O.D.); (K.L.)
- Computer Vision Center, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Manolis Tsiknakis
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece; (I.K.); (A.D.); (M.T.); (K.M.)
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
- Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 45500 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Karim Lekadir
- Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain; (O.D.); (K.L.)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kostas Marias
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece; (I.K.); (A.D.); (M.T.); (K.M.)
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mertens TF, Liebheit AT, Ehl J, Köhler R, Rakhymzhan A, Woehler A, Katthän L, Ebel G, Liublin W, Kasapi A, Triantafyllopoulou A, Schulz TJ, Niesner RA, Hauser AE. MarShie: a clearing protocol for 3D analysis of single cells throughout the bone marrow at subcellular resolution. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1764. [PMID: 38409121 PMCID: PMC10897183 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45827-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Analyzing immune cell interactions in the bone marrow is vital for understanding hematopoiesis and bone homeostasis. Three-dimensional analysis of the complete, intact bone marrow within the cortex of whole long bones remains a challenge, especially at subcellular resolution. We present a method that stabilizes the marrow and provides subcellular resolution of fluorescent signals throughout the murine femur, enabling identification and spatial characterization of hematopoietic and stromal cell subsets. By combining a pre-processing algorithm for stripe artifact removal with a machine-learning approach, we demonstrate reliable cell segmentation down to the deepest bone marrow regions. This reveals age-related changes in the marrow. It highlights the interaction between CX3CR1+ cells and the vascular system in homeostasis, in contrast to other myeloid cell types, and reveals their spatial characteristics after injury. The broad applicability of this method will contribute to a better understanding of bone marrow biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Fabian Mertens
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Immune Dynamics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Tabea Liebheit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Immune Dynamics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Ehl
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Immune Dynamics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf Köhler
- Immune Dynamics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Asylkhan Rakhymzhan
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Biophysical Analytics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew Woehler
- Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 10115, Berlin, Germany
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA
| | - Lukas Katthän
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. and Co. Bertha-von-Suttner-Straße 5, 37085, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gernot Ebel
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. and Co. Bertha-von-Suttner-Straße 5, 37085, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wjatscheslaw Liublin
- Biophysical Analytics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ana Kasapi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Innate Immunity in Rheumatic Diseases, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antigoni Triantafyllopoulou
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Innate Immunity in Rheumatic Diseases, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tim Julius Schulz
- Department of Adipocyte Development and Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE) Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), 85764, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Raluca Aura Niesner
- Biophysical Analytics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Dynamic and Functional in vivo Imaging, Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Erika Hauser
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Immune Dynamics, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), a Leibniz Institute, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Where imaging and metrics meet. Nat Methods 2024; 21:151. [PMID: 38347133 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02187-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
|
15
|
Maier-Hein L, Reinke A, Godau P, Tizabi MD, Buettner F, Christodoulou E, Glocker B, Isensee F, Kleesiek J, Kozubek M, Reyes M, Riegler MA, Wiesenfarth M, Kavur AE, Sudre CH, Baumgartner M, Eisenmann M, Heckmann-Nötzel D, Rädsch T, Acion L, Antonelli M, Arbel T, Bakas S, Benis A, Blaschko MB, Cardoso MJ, Cheplygina V, Cimini BA, Collins GS, Farahani K, Ferrer L, Galdran A, van Ginneken B, Haase R, Hashimoto DA, Hoffman MM, Huisman M, Jannin P, Kahn CE, Kainmueller D, Kainz B, Karargyris A, Karthikesalingam A, Kofler F, Kopp-Schneider A, Kreshuk A, Kurc T, Landman BA, Litjens G, Madani A, Maier-Hein K, Martel AL, Mattson P, Meijering E, Menze B, Moons KGM, Müller H, Nichyporuk B, Nickel F, Petersen J, Rajpoot N, Rieke N, Saez-Rodriguez J, Sánchez CI, Shetty S, van Smeden M, Summers RM, Taha AA, Tiulpin A, Tsaftaris SA, Van Calster B, Varoquaux G, Jäger PF. Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation. Nat Methods 2024; 21:195-212. [PMID: 38347141 PMCID: PMC11182665 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02151-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. In biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, and thus fail to adequately measure scientific progress and hinder translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, we created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Developed by a large international consortium in a multistage Delphi process, it is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint-a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), dataset and algorithm output. On the basis of the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as classification tasks at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. Its applicability is demonstrated for various biomedical use cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Maier-Hein
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Helmholtz Imaging, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Annika Reinke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Helmholtz Imaging, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Patrick Godau
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Minu D Tizabi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Buettner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt/Mainz, a partnership between DKFZ and UCT Frankfurt-Marburg, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Insititute, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Evangelia Christodoulou
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ben Glocker
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
| | - Fabian Isensee
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Applied Computer Vision Lab, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Kleesiek
- Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michal Kozubek
- Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis and Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Riegler
- Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Manuel Wiesenfarth
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Biostatistics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Emre Kavur
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Applied Computer Vision Lab, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carole H Sudre
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL and Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Baumgartner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eisenmann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim Rädsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Helmholtz Imaging, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Acion
- Instituto de Cálculo, CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michela Antonelli
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tal Arbel
- Centre for Intelligent Machines and MILA (Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute), McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Division of Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, IU Health Information and Translational Sciences Building, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arriel Benis
- Department of Digital Medical Technologies, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel
- European Federation for Medical Informatics, Le Mont-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthew B Blaschko
- Center for Processing Speech and Images, Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Jorge Cardoso
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veronika Cheplygina
- Department of Computer Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Beth A Cimini
- Imaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Keyvan Farahani
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Luciana Ferrer
- Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación (ICC), CONICET-UBA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Adrian Galdran
- BCN Medtech, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning AIML, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bram van Ginneken
- Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Haase
- Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, DFG Cluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Dresden, Germany
- Center for Systems Biology, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel A Hashimoto
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- General Robotics Automation Sensing and Perception Laboratory, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael M Hoffman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Merel Huisman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Pierre Jannin
- Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image - UMR_S 1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
- INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Charles E Kahn
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dagmar Kainmueller
- Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Biomedical Image Analysis and HI Helmholtz Imaging, Berlin, Germany
- Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kainz
- Department of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department AIBE, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Annette Kopp-Schneider
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Biostatistics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Kreshuk
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tahsin Kurc
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Geert Litjens
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Amin Madani
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Klaus Maier-Hein
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne L Martel
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Mattson
- Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA, USA
| | - Erik Meijering
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bjoern Menze
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henning Müller
- Information Systems Institute, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland
- Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Brennan Nichyporuk
- MILA (Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Petersen
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nasir Rajpoot
- Tissue Image Analytics Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Julio Saez-Rodriguez
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara I Sánchez
- Informatics Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten van Smeden
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M Summers
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Abdel A Taha
- Institute of Information Systems Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksei Tiulpin
- Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Neurocenter Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration and EPI-centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gaël Varoquaux
- Parietal project team, INRIA Saclay-Île de France, Palaiseau, France
| | - Paul F Jäger
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, HI Helmholtz Imaging, Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Interactive Machine Learning Group, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|