Comparison of Adaptation between the Major Connectors Fabricated from Intraoral Digital Impressions and Extraoral Digital Impressions

Intaglio Surface Adaptation of Removable Partial Denture Framework Fabricated by Various Data Acquisition Techniques and Fabrication Approaches

OBJECTIVES

 The aim of this study was to compare intaglio surface adaptation of the removable partial denture framework among various data acquisition techniques and fabrication approaches using three-dimensional comparison by metrology software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 The partial edentulous typodont model with five digital superimposition landmarks was duplicated and scanned for the digital reference model. Three approaches were the conventional lost-wax (group I; LWT, n = 5), intraoral digital impressions combined with PolyJet printing and lost-wax (group II; IP-LWT, n = 5), and extraoral digital impressions combined with PolyJet printing and lost-wax (group III; EP-LWT, n = 5). Each framework was scanned and superimposed with the reference model. The misfits at 53 locations were measured.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference for pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

 Significant differences were found between three approaches at the reciprocal arm, terminal part of the retentive arm, rest, and major connector (p < 0.05). In the LWT group, the reciprocal arm and palatal vault region of major connector had the lowest misfits, but the highest misfit was found in the midline region (p < 0.001). In the IP-LWT group revealed the most excessive contact at the terminal part of the retentive arm (-0.111 ± 0.038 mm, p = 0.031), with the highest misfit at the rest area (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 A difference in adaptation was found in several removable partial denture framework components among three approaches. The LWT group had a better adaptation than other groups. Nevertheless, a clinically acceptable adaptation was seen in all three approaches.

Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview

PURPOSE

This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the mechanisms of 3D printing, the dental materials relevant to each mechanism, and the possible applications of these materials within different areas of dentistry.

METHODS

Subtopics within 3D printing technology in dentistry were identified and divided among five reviewers. Electronic searches of the Medline (PubMed) database were performed with the following search keywords: 3D printing, digital light processing, stereolithography, digital dentistry, dental materials, and a combination of the keywords. For this review, only studies or review papers investigating 3D printing technology for dental or medical applications were included. Due to the nature of this review, no formal evidence-based quality assessment was performed, and the search was limited to the English language without further restrictions.

RESULTS

A total of 64 articles were included. The significant applications, applied materials, limitations, and future directions of 3D printing technology were reviewed. Subtopics include the chronological evolution of 3D printing technology, the mechanisms of 3D printing technologies along with different printable materials with unique biomechanical properties, and the wide range of applications for 3D printing in dentistry.

CONCLUSIONS

This review article gives an overview of the history and evolution of 3D printing technology, as well as its associated advantages and disadvantages. Current 3D printing technologies include stereolithography, digital light processing, fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering/melting, photopolymer jetting, powder binder, and 3D laser bioprinting. The main categories of 3D printing materials are polymers, metals, and ceramics. Despite limitations in printing accuracy and quality, 3D printing technology is now able to offer us a wide variety of potential applications in different fields of dentistry, including prosthodontics, implantology, oral and maxillofacial, orthodontics, endodontics, and periodontics. Understanding the existing spectrum of 3D printing applications in dentistry will serve to further expand its use in the dental field. Three-dimensional printing technology has brought about a paradigm shift in the delivery of clinical care in medicine and dentistry. The clinical use of 3D printing has created versatile applications which streamline our digital workflow. Technological advancements have also paved the way for the integration of new dental materials into dentistry.

Fit accuracy in the rest region of RPDs fabricated by digital technologies and conventional lost-wax casting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Digital technologies have recently been introduced into the fabrication of removable partial dentures (RPDs). However, it is still unclear whether the digitally fabricated RPDs fit better than conventionally cast ones in the rest region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit accuracy in the rest region of RPDs fabricated by digital technologies and compare it to those made by conventional lost-wax (CLW) technique.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science and SpringerLink. Studies published up to August 2022 were collected. Two authors analyzed the studies independently and assessed the risk of bias on the modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) scale. The mean values of gap distance between rests and corresponding rest seats of each study were extracted as outcome. A random-effects model at a significance level of P < 0.05 was used in the global comparison and subgroup analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 articles out of 1214 complied with the inclusion criteria and were selected, including 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 non-randomized clinical trial and 8 in vitro studies. Quantitative data from Meta-analysis revealed that fit accuracy in the rest region of RPDs fabricated with CLW showed no statistically significant difference with digital techniques (SMD = 0.33, 95%CI (-0.18, 0.83), P = 0.21). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly better fit accuracy of CLW-fabricated RPDs in the rest region than either additive manufacturing (AM) groups or indirect groups (P = 0.03, P = 0.00), in which wax or resin patterns are milled or printed before conventional casting. While milled RPDs fit significantly better than cast ones in the rest region (P = 0.00). With digital relief and heat treatment, hybrid manufactured (HM) clasps obtained better fit accuracy in the rest region (P < 0.05). In addition, finishing and polishing procedure had no significant influence in the fit accuracy in all groups (P = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

RPDs fabricated by digital technologies exhibit comparable fit accuracy in rest region with those made by CLW. Digital technologies may be a promising alternative to CLW for the fabrication of RPDs and additional studies are recommended to provide stronger evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42020201313.

Knowledge on Applications of 3D Design and Printing in Dentistry Among Dental Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Questionnaire-Based Survey

Background: This knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) survey will provide baseline data and identify gaps that may facilitate understanding and further action to plan, implement, and evaluate practice toward 3D-printing technology among dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia.

Aims and objectives: The present study aims to assess dental practitioners' self-reported knowledge, attitude, and practice of 3D printing in Saudi Arabia.

Methodology: A cross-sectional, closed-ended questionnaire of registered dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia was conducted. A sample size of 156 was considered for analysis. After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, Riyadh Elm University, the research was conducted during the month of April 2022 amongst 154 registered dental practitioners. The research was distributed among dental health specialists either working in dental colleges, dental clinics, or both in government as well as private settings. Dentists who were not actively involved in 3D printing were excluded. SPSS software, version 25.0, (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the data.

Results and conclusion: Of all dentists included in the study, 98% were found to be aware that 3D printing in dentistry is used in Saudi Arabia and 2 % were not aware of its usage in Saudi Arabia. In total, 78.60% of the dentists felt that 3D-printed implant guides made the placement of implants the most accurate and least complicated procedure, and 21.40% of the dentists felt it was the least accurate and most complicated procedure.

Physicomechanical properties of cobalt-chromium removable partial denture palatal major connectors fabricated by selective laser melting

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Additive manufacturing by selective laser melting (SLM) has been claimed to be less challenging than conventional casting of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) removable partial dentures (RPDs), providing significant improvements. However, how the physicomechanical properties of Co-Cr RPDs fabricated by SLM compare with those fabricated by conventional casting is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the physicomechanical properties of Co-Cr RPD palatal major connectors fabricated by SLM compared with those fabricated by conventional casting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A master die simulating a maxillary arch of Kennedy class III modification 1 was scanned to create a virtual 3-dimensional (3D) cast. Two groups of 5 Co-Cr RPD major connectors were fabricated. In the 3D printing group, the Co-Cr major connector was virtually designed and exported for direct SLM 3D printing. For the conventional group, Co-Cr major connectors were constructed conventionally. The Co-Cr major connectors were virtually superimposed with the master die for surface adaptation analysis. Additional comparative analyses of surface roughness, relative density, microhardness, and microstructure of the 2 groups were performed. Data were analyzed by using independent t tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

The overall volumetric and linear discrepancies were significantly higher (P<.05) in the 3D printing group. Significant differences in the surface roughness (P<.05) and microhardness (P<.05) were observed, with the 3D printing group having higher surface roughness and microhardness than the conventional group. Unlike conventional connectors, the microstructure of 3D-printed connectors showed fine homogeneous granules.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the conventional casting technique, SLM 3D printing enabled the fabrication of Co-Cr RPD major connectors with higher microhardness and fine homogenous microstructure. However, the surface adaptation and surface roughness of SLM 3D printing Co-Cr connectors were worse than those produced conventionally. Both techniques showed similar relative densities.

Accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks for removable partial dentures evaluated by digital superimposition

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks (MEP group) for removable partial dentures (RPDs) by digital superimposition, in comparison to that of frameworks produced by the conventional (CON group) and resin printing/casting (RPC group) workflows.

METHODS

A partially edentulous maxillary dentiform was prepared with rest seats and guiding planes on the right canine, left first premolar, and left second molar. Thirty master casts were prepared via repeated impressions of the dentiform. Frameworks were fabricated by three different workflows (n = 10 for each group). The internal discrepancies of the frameworks were assessed at 12 points by digital scanning with an optical triangulation principle-based tabletop scanner and superimposition using a reference best-fit alignment method. First, the master cast was scanned alone. Subsequently, a thin silicone material was applied to the framework and fitted onto the master cast, after which the framework was removed. Finally, the master cast with the silicone material attached was rescanned. The data from the two scans were matched, with the reference being the area not occupied by the silicone.

RESULTS

For the CON, MEP, and RPC groups, respectively, the mean overall internal discrepancies (279.72 µm, 241.02 µm, and 331.70 µm), and the mean internal discrepancies on palate areas (292.92 µm, 250.72 µm, and 355.84 µm) and rest seat areas (240.12 µm, 211.91 µm, and 259.26 µm) did not significantly differ among the three fabrication methods (p = 0.558, 0.542, and 0.774).

SIGNIFICANCE

The reference best-fit alignment of scan datasets is a useful approach to evaluate the internal discrepancy of frameworks. Metal 3D printing produces RPD frameworks that are comparable to conventional frameworks and meet clinical standards.

Marginal and internal fit and intaglio surface trueness of interim crowns fabricated from tooth preparation of four finish line locations

This study evaluated the marginal and internal fit and intaglio surface trueness of interim crowns fabricated from tooth preparation scanned at four finish line locations. The right maxillary first molar tooth preparation model was fabricated using a ceramic material and placed in four finish line locations (supragingival, equigingival, subgingival, and subgingival with a cord). Intraoral scanning was performed. Crowns were designed based on the scanned area. Interim crowns were fabricated using a stereolithography three-dimensional (3D) printer (N = 16 per location). Marginal and internal fit were evaluated with a silicone replica technique. Intaglio surface trueness was evaluated using a 3D inspection software. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD test were performed for comparisons (α = 0.05). The marginal and internal fit showed significant differences according to locations (P < 0.05); the marginal fit showed the best results in the supragingival finish line (P < 0.05). Intaglio surface trueness was significantly different in the marginal region, with the highest value in the subgingival location (P < 0.05). Crowns fabricated on the subgingival finish line caused inaccurate marginal fit due to poor fabrication reproducibility of the marginal region. The use of an intraoral scanner should be decided on the clinical situation and needs.

A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part II: CAD/CAM framework, artificial teeth, and denture base

PURPOSE

This study comprehensively reviewed the current status of the digital workflow of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and summarized information about the fabrication methods and material properties of the dental framework, artificial teeth, and denture base.

STUDY SELECTION

We performed a systematic review of the literature published in online databases from January 1980 to April 2020 regarding RPD fabrication and materials used in the related digital technology. We selected eligible articles, retrieved information regarding digital RPDs, and conducted qualitative/quantitative analyses. In this paper, the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) framework, artificial teeth, and denture base materials are reported.

RESULTS

A variety of materials, such as cobalt-chromium alloy, titanium, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone, are used for dental CAD/CAM frameworks. The mechanical strength of the metal materials used for the CAD/CAM framework was superior to that of the cast framework. However, the fitness and surface roughness of the framework and clasp fabricated using a selective laser melting (SLM) method were not superior to those obtained via cast fabrication. Most material properties and the surface roughness of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) discs used for digital RPDs were superior to those of heat-cured PMMA.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a CAD/CAM framework and PMMA disc for digital RPDs offers numerous advantages over conventional RPDs. However, technical challenges regarding the accuracy and durability of adhesion between the framework and denture base remain to be solved. In digital fabrication, human technical factors influence the quality of the framework.

Effect of layer thickness setting on the adaptation of stereolithography apparatus-fabricated metal frameworks for removable partial dentures: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A staircase effect is noted in the fabrication of metal frameworks for removable partial dentures (RPDs) when using stereolithography apparatus (SLA). It affects the adaptation of the definitive metal framework depending on the layer thickness setting. However, studies on the effect of the layer thickness setting on the adaptation of metal frameworks are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the optimal layer thickness through comparative analysis of the adaptation of SLA-fabricated metal frameworks with different layer thickness settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 15 metal RPD frameworks were SLA-fabricated by using 3 different layer thickness settings (16 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm). The adaptation of the frameworks was measured by using the silicone replica technique, sectioned at the canine, first molar, and second molar regions by using a guide. The thickness of the light-body silicone was measured with a digital microscope at 3 points in each of the 3 areas. The measurements of the adaptation were statistically analyzed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

The gaps measured in each area showed statistically significant differences in all 3 groups (P<.05). In the anterior, middle, and posterior areas, the 16-μm metal framework group showed the narrowest gaps (207 ±46 μm, 195 ±49 μm, and 188 ±40 μm, respectively). The 3 groups showed statistically significant differences in total gaps in the RPD frameworks relative to the layer thickness settings (P<.05); the total gap was lowest (197 ±42 μm) for the 16-μm group.

CONCLUSIONS

For SLA, 50 μm is the recommended layer thickness considering the effect of layer thickness settings on the adaptation of the RPD framework and the fabrication time.

Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Conventional fabrication of complete denture metal bases is being replaced by the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems. However, a comparative analysis of subtractive and additive CAD-CAM manufacturing techniques is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated by milling (subtractive manufacturing) and stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) (additive manufacturing).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty metal bases were manufactured by using the milling (MIL group), SLA (SLA group), and DLP (DLP group) techniques. The silicone replica technique was used to evaluate the adaptation of the complete denture metal bases, and 30 silicone blocks were fabricated. The silicone block was cut equally in the canine, first molar, and second molar areas. The gap between the model and the metal base was measured by using a digital microscope at the 3 locations, and the measured data were statistically analyzed by using a statistical software program (α=.05).

RESULTS

The gaps measured at the 3 areas showed significant differences in all 3 groups (P<.05). At the anterior, middle, and posterior areas, the SLA group showed the narrowest gap (302 ±31 μm, 241 ±39 μm, 201 ±43 μm, respectively). The SLA group also had the narrowest total gap of the metal bases (218 ±33 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

The adaptation of the fabricated metal bases varied significantly across the techniques used but fell within a clinically allowable range. The SLA group was the most precise in the fabrication of complete denture metal bases. Further studies are required to analyze the effects of the layer thickness setting, wax elimination, and casting temperature on the adaptation of metal bases manufactured by using SLA.

Current Biomedical Applications of 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged over the past four decades as a cost-effective, on-demand modality for fabrication of geometrically complex objects. The ability to design and print virtually any object shape using a diverse array of materials, such as metals, polymers, ceramics and bioinks, has allowed for the adoption of this technology for biomedical applications in both research and clinical settings. Current advancements in tissue engineering and regeneration, therapeutic delivery, medical device fabrication and operative management planning ensure that AM will continue to play an increasingly important role in the future of healthcare. In this review, we outline current biomedical applications of common AM techniques and materials.

3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry

This narrative review presents an overview on the currently available 3D printing technologies and their utilization in experimental, clinical and educational facets, from the perspective of different specialties of dentistry, including oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, endodontics, prosthodontics, and periodontics. It covers research and innovation, treatment modalities, education and training, employing the rapidly developing 3D printing process. Research-oriented advancement in 3D printing in dentistry is witnessed by the rising number of publications on this topic. Visualization of treatment outcomes makes it a promising clinical tool. Educational programs utilizing 3D-printed models stimulate training of dental skills in students and trainees. 3D printing has enormous potential to ameliorate oral health care in research, clinical treatment, and education in dentistry.