Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with Intracranial Meningiomas: impact of radiotherapy regimen on local control

A Case-based Guide for World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 2 Meningioma Radiosurgery and Radiation Therapy from The Radiosurgery Society

PURPOSE

Meningiomas represent the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Current treatment options include surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), definitive RT, and observation. However, the radiation dose, fractionation, and margins used to treat patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas, which account for approximately 20% of all meningiomas, are not clearly defined, and deciding on the optimal treatment modality can be challenging owing to the lack of randomized data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this manuscript, 3 cases of patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas are presented with descriptions of treatment options after gross total resection, subtotal resection, and previous irradiation. Treatment recommendations were compiled from 9 central nervous system radiation oncology and neurosurgery experts from The Radiosurgery Society, and the consensus of treatment recommendations is reported.

RESULTS

Both conventional and stereotactic RT are treatment options for WHO grade 2 meningiomas. The majority of prospective data in the setting of WHO grade 2 meningiomas involve larger margins. Stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic RT are less appropriate in this setting. Conventionally fractionated RT to at least 59.4 Gy is considered standard of care with utilization of preoperative and postoperative imaging to evaluate the extent of disease and possible osseous involvement. After careful discussion, stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic RT may play a role for the subset of patients who are unable to tolerate the standard lengthy conventionally fractionated treatment course, for those with prior RT, or for small residual tumors. However, more studies are needed to determine the optimal approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This case-based evaluation of the current literature seeks to provide examples for the management of grade 2 meningiomas and give examples of both conventional and stereotactic RT.

Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Intracranial Meningiomas-An Opportunity for Radiation Dose De-Escalation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possibility of dose de-escalation, with consideration of the efficacy and safety of robotic stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy in patients diagnosed with intracranial meningiomas.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 172 patients (42 men and 130 women) treated in III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic of Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Gliwice between January 2011 and July 2018. The qualification for dose de-escalation was based on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) features: largest tumor diameter less than 5 cm, well-defined tumor margins, no edema, and no brain infiltration. The age of patients was 21-79 years (median 59 years) at diagnosis and 24-80 years (median 62 years) at radiotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (Group A) were irradiated after initial surgery. Histopathological findings were meningioma grade WHO 1 in 51 and WHO 2 in 16 cases. Group B (105 patients) had no prior surgery and the diagnosis was based on the typical features of meningioma on MRI. All patients qualified for the robotic stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy, and the total dose received was 18 Gy in three fractions to reference isodose 78-92%.

RESULTS

Follow-up period was 18 to 124 months (median 67.5 months). Five- and eight-year progression free survival was 90.3% and 89.4%, respectively. Two patients died during the follow-up period. Progression of tumor after radiotherapy was registered in 16 cases. Four patients required surgery due to progressive disease, and three of them were progression free during further follow-up. Twelve patients received a second course of robotic radiotherapy, 11 of them had stable disease, and one patient showed further tumor growth but died of heart failure. Crude progression free survival after both primary and secondary treatment was 98.8%. Radiotherapy was well-tolerated: acute toxicity grade 1/2 (EORTC-RTOG scale) was seen in 10.5% of patients. We did not observe any late effects of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy with total dose of 18 Gy delivered in three fractions showed comparable efficacy to treatment schedules with higher doses. This could support the idea of dose de-escalation in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas.

Fractionated radiotherapy for surgically resected intracranial meningiomas: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aside from surgical resection, the only standard of care treatment modality for meningiomas is radiotherapy (RT). Despite this, few studies have focused on identifying clinical covariates associated with failure of fractionated RT following surgical resection (fRT), and the timing of fRT following surgery still remains controversial (adjuvant versus salvage fRT). We assessed the outcomes of the largest, multi-institutional cohort of surgically resected meningiomas treated with subsequent adjuvant and salvage fRT to identify factors associated with local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) over 3-10 years post-fRT and to determine the optimal timing of fRT.

METHODS

Patients with intracranial meningiomas who underwent surgery and fRT between 1997 and 2018 were included. Primary endpoints were radiographic recurrence/progression and time to progression from the completion of fRT.

RESULTS

404 meningiomas were included for analysis. Of these, 167 (41.3%) recurred post-fRT. Clinical covariates independently associated with worse PFS post-fRT included receipt of previous RT to the meningioma, having a WHO grade 3 meningioma or recurrent meningioma, the meningioma having a higher MIB1-index or brain invasion on pathology, and older patient age at diagnosis. Subgroup analysis identified higher MIB1-index as a histological factor associated with poorer LFFR in WHO grade 2 meningiomas. 179 patients underwent adjuvant RT shortly after surgery whereas 225 patients had delayed, salvage fRT after recurrence/progression. Following propensity score matching, patients that underwent adjuvant fRT had improved LFFR post-fRT compared to those that received salvage fRT.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of clinical factors that can predict a meningioma's response to fRT following surgery. Adjuvant fRT may be associated with improved PFS post-fRT compared to salvage fRT. Molecular biomarkers of RT-responsiveness are needed to better inform fRT treatment decisions.

The role of radiation therapy and systemic treatments in meningioma: The present and the future

Meningiomas are the most prevalent tumors of the central nervous system. Their standard treatment is surgery, which can be curative. Adjuvant radiotherapy treatment is reserved for newly diagnosed cases of grade II and grade III meningiomas in cases of recurrent disease or when surgery is not radical or feasible. However, around 20% of these patients cannot undergo further surgical and/or radiotherapy treatment. Systemic oncological therapy can find its place in this setting. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been tested (gefitinib, erlotinib, sunitinib) with unsatisfactory or negative results. Bevacizumab has shown encouraging results in these settings of patients. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has reported interesting results with modest objective response rates. Several ongoing studies are assessing different target therapies and multimodal therapies; the results are to be disclosed. Not only a better understanding of the molecular characteristics in meningiomas has allowed the gathering of more information regarding pathogenesis and prognosis, but in addition, the availability of new target therapy, immunotherapy, and biological drugs has widened the scope of potentially effective treatments in this patient population. The aim of this review was to explore the radiotherapy and systemic treatments of meningioma with an analysis of ongoing trials and future therapeutic perspectives.

Outcomes and predictors of response to fractionated radiotherapy as primary treatment for intracranial meningiomas

Background

Surgery is the primary treatment for most meningiomas. However, primary fractionated radiotherapy (fRT) remains an option for patients with larger meningiomas in challenging anatomic locations or patients at prohibitively high surgical risk. Outcome prediction for these patients is uncertain and cannot be guided by histopathology without available tumor tissue from surgery. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical factors that contribute to treatment failure in a large cohort of meningiomas consecutively treated with fRT as primary therapy, with the goal of identifying predictors of response.

Methods

Patients treated with primary fRT for intracranial meningiomas from 1998 to 2017 were reviewed. Those who received primary surgical resection, radiosurgery, previous fRT, or had <6 months of clinical follow-up were excluded. We applied logistic regression and Cox regression modeling to ascertain key predictors of treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AE) following fRT.

Results

Our cohort included 137 meningiomas, 21 of which progressed after fRT (median PFS 3.45 years). Progressive meningiomas had a larger median gross tumor volume (GTV) compared to those that remained stable (19.1 cm³ vs 9.6 cm³, p = 2.86 × 10^-2). GTV > 11.27 cm³ was independently predictive of progression and larger GTV was associated with higher risk of significant (grades 3/4) AE following fRT. Cavernous sinus and optic nerve sheath meningiomas had overall excellent outcomes post-fRT.

Conclusions

We present a large cohort of meningiomas treated with primary fRT and find GTV and anatomic location to be key predictors of outcome, adding to the complex treatment considerations for this heterogeneous disease.

Meningioma Treated With Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife®: First in the United Arab Emirates

A 26-year-old premenopausal lady was referred to the Department of Oncology with headaches and easy fatiguability. She had presented with the same complaints a few years ago. At that time, imaging revealed a right falcine space-occupying lesion (SOL), for which she underwent an unsuccessful attempt of excision. Imaging studies confirmed that the SOL was progressive and arose from the meninges. Previous excision failure was due to a network of blood vessels around the tumor and critical structures such as the thalamus and the brainstem, which made any approach challenging.

The patient did not want further surgery and requested a non-surgical intervention. Considering the above, the case was discussed at the Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Board, and treatment with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife® was agreed upon. The patient received a total of 21 Gy in three fractions over six days and completed the treatment without any adverse reactions.

This is the first case treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using the CyberKnife® in the United Arab Emirates, which is an effective and safe modality to treat similar challenging cases.

Radiotherapy of benign intracranial tumours

We present the updated recommendations of the French Society for Radiation Oncology on benign intracranial tumours. Most of them are meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas, and glomus tumours. Some grow very slowly, and can be observed without specific treatment, especially if they are asymptomatic. Symptomatic or growing tumours are treated by surgery, which is the reference treatment. When surgery is not possible, due to the location of the lesion, or general conditions, radiotherapy can be applied, as it is if there is a postoperative growing residual tumour, or a local relapse. Indications have to be discussed at a multidisciplinary panel, with precise evaluation of the benefit and risks of the treatments. The techniques to be used are the most modern ones, as multimodal imaging and image-guided radiation therapy. Stereotactic treatments, using fractionated or single doses depending on the size or the location of the tumours, are commonly realized, to avoid as much a possible the occurrence of late side effects.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for clinoid meningiomas: a multi-institutional study

PURPOSE

Resection of clinoid meningiomas can be associated with significant morbidity. Experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for clinoid meningiomas remains limited. We studied the safety and effectiveness of SRS for clinoid meningiomas.

METHODS

From twelve institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients treated with SRS for radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed WHO grade I clinoid meningiomas.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven patients (median age: 56 years) underwent SRS for clinoid meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.02 cm³, and 87% of tumors were immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus. The median tumor prescription dose was 12 Gy, and the median maximal dose to the anterior optic apparatus was 8.5 Gy. During a median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 51.1 months, 7% of patients experienced tumor progression. Greater margin SRS dose (HR = 0.700, p = 0.007) and pre-SRS radiotherapy (HR = 0.004, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of better tumor control. During median visual follow-up of 48 months, visual function declined in 8% of patients. Pre-SRS visual deficit (HR = 2.938, p = 0.048) and maximal radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy (HR = 11.297, p = 0.02) independently predicted greater risk of post-SRS visual decline. Four patients experienced new post-SRS cranial nerve V neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS allows durable control of clinoid meningiomas and visual preservation in the majority of patients. Greater radiosurgical prescription dose is associated with better tumor control. Radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy and visual impairment before the SRS increase risk of visual deterioration.

Effect of osteoporotic conditions on the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma

PURPOSE

Disruption of the tumor-brain barrier in meningioma is a crucial factor in peritumoral brain edema (PTBE). We previously reported the possible effect of osteoporosis on the integrity of the arachnoid trabeculae because both the bone and the arachnoid trabeculae are composed of type 1 collagen. We hypothesized that osteoporotic conditions may be associated with PTBE occurrence after radiation treatment in patients with meningioma.

METHODS

A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cut-off values of mean skull Hounsfield unit for predicting osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients from our registry. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine whether possible osteoporosis independently predicted PTBE development in patients with meningioma after radiation.

RESULTS

A total of 106 intracranial meningiomas were included for the study. All patients received linear accelerator-based radiation therapy in our hospital over an approximate 6-year period. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that hypothetical osteoporosis was an independent predictive factor for the development of PTBE in patients with meningioma after linear accelerator-based radiation treatment (hazard ratio 5.20; 95% confidence interval 1.11-24.46; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that possible osteoporotic conditions may affect PTBE development after linear accelerator-based radiation treatment for intracranial meningioma. However, due to the study's small number of patients, these findings need to be validated in future studies with larger cohorts, before firm recommendations can be made.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Perioptic Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used for management of perioptic meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and effectiveness of SRS for perioptic meningiomas.

METHODS

From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), we retrospectively assessed treatment parameters and outcomes following SRS for meningiomas located within 3 mm of the optic apparatus.

RESULTS

A total of 438 patients (median age 51 yr) underwent SRS for histologically confirmed (29%) or radiologically suspected (71%) perioptic meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.01 cm3. Median prescription dose was 12 Gy, and median dose to the optic apparatus was 8.50 Gy. A total of 405 patients (93%) underwent single-fraction SRS and 33 patients (7%) underwent hypofractionated SRS. During median imaging follow-up of 55.6 mo (range: 3.15-239 mo), 33 (8%) patients experienced tumor progression. Actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr progression-free survival was 96% and 89%, respectively. Prescription dose of ≥12 Gy (HR: 0.310; 95% CI [0.141-0.679], P = .003) and single-fraction SRS (HR: 0.078; 95% CI [0.016-0.395], P = .002) were associated with improved tumor control. A total of 31 (10%) patients experienced visual decline, with actuarial 5-yr and 10-yr post-SRS visual decline rates of 9% and 21%, respectively. Maximum dose to the optic apparatus ≥10 Gy (HR = 2.370; 95% CI [1.086-5.172], P = .03) and tumor progression (HR = 4.340; 95% CI [2.070-9.097], P < .001) were independent predictors of post-SRS visual decline.

CONCLUSION

SRS provides durable tumor control and quite acceptable rates of vision preservation in perioptic meningiomas. Margin dose of ≥12 Gy is associated with improved tumor control, while a dose to the optic apparatus of ≥10 Gy and tumor progression are associated with post-SRS visual decline.

The long-term outcome of CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy for central skull base meningiomas: a single-center experience

Few reports exist demonstrating the effects of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) on the central skull base meningiomas (CSMs). A retrospective analysis of 113 patients was performed. The median age was 62 (IQR 50-72) years old, and 78 patients (69%) were female. Upfront SRT was performed in 41 (36%), where 17 (15%) patients were asymptomatic. The other SRT was for postoperative adjuvant therapy in 32 (28%), and for the recurrent or relapsed tumors in 40 (35%) patients. Previous operation was done in 74 patients (66%). Among the available pathology in 46 patients, 37 (80%) were WHO grade I, 8 (17%) were grade II, and 1 (2%) was grade III. The median prescribed dose covered 95% of the planning target volume was 25 (IQR 21-25) Gy, and the median target volume was 9.5 (IQR 3.9-16.9) cm³. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48 (IQR 23-73) months and 84% and 78% were free of tumor progression at 5 and 10 years respectively. The median follow-up was 49 (IQR 28-83) months. PFS was better in grade I than grade II (p = 0.02). No other baseline factors including the history of previous operation were associated with PD or PFS. Adverse events of radiation therapy were radiation-induced optic neuropathy (0.9%), and cerebral edema (4.4%). Asymptomatic cavernous carotid stenosis was found in three (2.7%), five (4.4%) underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for normal pressure hydrocephalus, and five (4.4%) died. SRT is useful for the management of CSMs with a low rate of adverse events.

Disease Site-Specific Guidelines for Curative Radiation Treatment During 'Limited Surgery' and 'Hospital Avoidance': A Radiation Oncology Perspective From the Epicenter of COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented situation where the standard of care (SOC) management for cancers has been altered significantly. Patients with potentially curable cancers are at risk of not receiving timely SOC multidisciplinary treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or combination treatments. Hospital resources are in such high demand for COVID-19 patients that procedures, such as surgery, dentistry, interventional radiology, and other ancillary services, are not available for cancer patients. Our tertiary care center is considered the center of the epicenter in the USA. As a result, all non-emergent surgeries have been suspended in order to provide hospital beds and other resources for COVID-19 patients.

Additionally, ambulatory efforts to avoid treatment-related morbidity are critical for keeping patients out of emergency departments and hospitals. In this review article, we discuss evidence-based radiation therapy approaches for curable cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on three scenarios of cancer care: 1) radiation therapy as an alternative to surgery when immediate surgery is not possible, 2) radiation therapy as a ‘bridge’ to surgery, and 3) radiation options definitively or postoperatively, given the risk of hospitalization with high-dose chemotherapy. 

Significance of skull osteoporosis to the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma

Background and purpose

Disruption of the tumor-brain barrier in meningioma plays a critical role in the development of peritumoral brain edema (PTBE). We hypothesized that osteoporotic conditions may be associated with PTBE occurrence after radiation in patients with intracranial meningioma.

Methods

We measured Hounsfield units (HU) of the frontal skull on simulation brain CT in patients who underwent linear accelerator (LINAC)-based radiation treatment for intracranial meningioma. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values for several predictive factors. The cumulative hazard for PTBE was estimated and classified according to these factors. Hazard ratios were then estimated to identify independent predictive factors associated with the development of PTBE after radiation in intracranial meningioma patients.

Results

A total of 83 intracranial meningiomas in 76 patients who received LINAC-based radiation treatment in our hospital over an approximate 5-year period were included for the study. We found mean frontal skull HU ≤630.625 and gross tumor volume >7.194 cc to be independent predictors of PTBE after radiation treatment in patients with meningioma (hazard ratio, 8.41; P = 0.019; hazard ratio, 5.92; P = 0.032, respectively). In addition, patients who were ≥65 years showed a marginally significant association with PTBE.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that possible osteoporotic conditions, large tumor volume, and older age may be associated with PTBE occurrence after LINAC-based radiation treatment for intracranial meningioma. In the future we anticipate that these findings may enhance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of PTBE after radiation in meningioma patients.

Normofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy versus CyberKnife-based hypofractionation in skull base meningioma: a German and Italian pooled cohort analysis

Background

This retrospective German and Italian multicenter analysis aimed to compare the role of normofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (nFSRT) to CyberKnife-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CK-hFSRT) for skull base meningiomas.

Methods

Overall, 341 patients across three centers were treated with either nFSRT or CK-hFSRT for skull base meningioma. Treatment planning was based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following institutional guidelines. Most nFSRT patients received 33 × 1.8 Gy, and most CK-hFSRT patients received 5 × 5 Gy. The median follow-up time was 36 months (range: 1–232 months).

Results

In the CK-hFSRT group, the 1-, 3-, and 10-year local control (LC) rates were 99.4, 96.8, and 80.3%, respectively. In the nFSRT group, the 1-, 3-, and 10-year LC rates were 100, 99, and 79.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences in LC rates between the nFSRT and CK-hFSRT groups (p = 0.56, hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval, 0.3–1.9). In the CK-hFSRT group, only one case (0.49%) of severe toxicity (CTCAE 4.0 ≥ 3) was observed. In the nFSRT group, three cases (2.1%) of grade III toxicity were observed.

Conclusion

This analysis of pooled data from three centers showed excellent LC and low side effect rates for patients treated with CK-hFSRT or nFSRT. The efficacy, safety, and convenience of a shortened treatment period provide a compelling case for the use of CK-hFSRT in patients with moderate size skull base meningioma and provided that OAR constraints are met.