1
|
Pan X, Hu Y, Lei G, Wei Y, Li J, Luan T, Zhang Y, Chu Y, Feng Y, Zhan W, Zhao C, Meunier FA, Liu Y, Li Y, Wang T. Actomyosin-II protects axons from degeneration induced by mild mechanical stress. J Cell Biol 2024; 223:e202206046. [PMID: 38713825 PMCID: PMC11076810 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202206046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Whether, to what extent, and how the axons in the central nervous system (CNS) can withstand sudden mechanical impacts remain unclear. By using a microfluidic device to apply controlled transverse mechanical stress to axons, we determined the stress levels that most axons can withstand and explored their instant responses at nanoscale resolution. We found mild stress triggers a highly reversible, rapid axon beading response, driven by actomyosin-II-dependent dynamic diameter modulations. This mechanism contributes to hindering the long-range spread of stress-induced Ca2+ elevations into non-stressed neuronal regions. Through pharmacological and molecular manipulations in vitro, we found that actomyosin-II inactivation diminishes the reversible beading process, fostering progressive Ca2+ spreading and thereby increasing acute axonal degeneration in stressed axons. Conversely, upregulating actomyosin-II activity prevents the progression of initial injury, protecting stressed axons from acute degeneration both in vitro and in vivo. Our study unveils the periodic actomyosin-II in axon shafts cortex as a novel protective mechanism, shielding neurons from detrimental effects caused by mechanical stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaorong Pan
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiqing Hu
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gaowei Lei
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences China, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaxuan Wei
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences China, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Li
- Division of Chemistry and Physical Biology, School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research and Trial Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Tongshu Luan
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunfan Zhang
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences China, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanyuan Chu
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Feng
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenrong Zhan
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunxia Zhao
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Frédéric A. Meunier
- Clem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yifan Liu
- Division of Chemistry and Physical Biology, School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research and Trial Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Li
- Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences China, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Wang
- The Brain Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goodman GW, Devlin P, West BE, Ritzel RM. The emerging importance of skull-brain interactions in traumatic brain injury. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1353513. [PMID: 38680490 PMCID: PMC11047125 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1353513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The recent identification of skull bone marrow as a reactive hematopoietic niche that can contribute to and direct leukocyte trafficking into the meninges and brain has transformed our view of this bone structure from a solid, protective casing to a living, dynamic tissue poised to modulate brain homeostasis and neuroinflammation. This emerging concept may be highly relevant to injuries that directly impact the skull such as in traumatic brain injury (TBI). From mild concussion to severe contusion with skull fracturing, the bone marrow response of this local myeloid cell reservoir has the potential to impact not just the acute inflammatory response in the brain, but also the remodeling of the calvarium itself, influencing its response to future head impacts. If we borrow understanding from recent discoveries in other CNS immunological niches and extend them to this nascent, but growing, subfield of neuroimmunology, it is not unreasonable to consider the hematopoietic compartment in the skull may similarly play an important role in health, aging, and neurodegenerative disease following TBI. This literature review briefly summarizes the traditional role of the skull in TBI and offers some additional insights into skull-brain interactions and their potential role in affecting secondary neuroinflammation and injury outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rodney M. Ritzel
- Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hou L, Zhang H, Li Y, Zhu H, Liao K, Guo B, Dong C, Li G, Ye W, Wang L, Xu H. Correlation analysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging of cannabinoid type 1 receptor in the lumbar spine and brain of aged osteoporosis female cynomolgus monkeys. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:7924-7935. [PMID: 38106237 PMCID: PMC10722013 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Although cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) antagonists can inhibit bone loss in osteoporosis mouse models, different strains of mice show different bone mass phenotypes after knock out the CB1R gene. The relationship between CB1R and bone metabolism is complex, and its regulatory role in bone metabolism and as a therapeutic target for osteoporosis requires further investigation. Methods Based on lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) data of healthy female cynomolgus monkeys aged 1-25 years, naturally aged postmenopausal female osteoporotic monkeys and normal young monkeys were screened by detecting lumbar vertebrae vBMD and estradiol levels in this study. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed on the lumbar spine and brain of the two groups of monkeys using the probe [11C]OMAR, which specifically targets CB1R, and the difference in the CB1R expression of osteoporotic monkeys was evaluated. Results The vBMD values of two standard deviations (SDs) below the peak bone value (428.1±53.8 g/cm3) were set as the reference standard for osteoporosis vBMD. Of the 49 healthy female cynomolgus monkeys, 4 postmenopausal older osteoporotic monkeys (18-26 years) and 5 young control monkeys (6-7 years) were selected, and the mean vBMD of the lumbar spine of the two groups was 295.07±19.11 and 419.72±16.14 g/cm3, respectively (P<0.0001). Radioactive uptake in the lumbar spine was linearly and negatively correlated with vBMD (r=-0.7977; P=0.01). Dynamic PET/MR imaging of the brains showed that CB1R was upregulated in the osteoporosis group, and there was a negative linear correlation between the vBMD and area under the time-radioactivity curve (AUC) of the thalamus (r=-0.8506; P=0.0153) and prefrontal cortex (r=-0.8306; P=0.0207). Conclusions In this study, PET/CT-MRI molecular imaging technology revealed that CB1R was upregulated in the lumbar spine and brain of the osteoporosis monkeys and that CB1R may be regulated by the brain-bone axis. CB1R antagonist may be a potential drug for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Hou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haitong Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Honghao Zhu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Liao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Guo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenchen Dong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guocong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weijian Ye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Localized, time-dependent responses of rat cranial bone to repeated mild traumatic brain injuries. Sci Rep 2022; 12:14175. [PMID: 36050485 PMCID: PMC9437056 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18643-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
While it is well-established that bone responds dynamically to mechanical loading, the effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on cranial bone composition are unclear. We hypothesized that repeated mTBI (rmTBI) would change the microstructure of cranial bones, without gross skull fractures. To address this, young adult female Piebald Viral Glaxo rats received sham, 1×, 2× or 3× closed-head mTBIs delivered at 24 h intervals, using a weight-drop device custom-built for reproducible impact. Skull bones were collected at 2 or 10 weeks after the final injury/sham procedure, imaged by micro computed tomography and analyzed at predetermined regions of interest. In the interparietal bone, proximal to the injury site, modest increases in bone thickness were observed at 2 weeks, particularly following 2× and 3× mTBI. By 10 weeks, 2× mTBI induced a robust increase in the volume and thickness of the interparietal bone, alongside a corresponding decrease in the volume of marrow cavities in the diploë region. In contrast, neither parietal nor frontal skull samples were affected by rmTBI. Our findings demonstrate time- and location-dependent effects of rmTBI on cranial bone structure, highlighting a need to consider microstructural alterations to cranial bone when assessing the consequences of rmTBI.
Collapse
|
5
|
Association of cannabinoid receptor modulation with normal and abnormal skeletal remodelling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro, in vivo and human studies. Pharmacol Res 2021; 175:105928. [PMID: 34800625 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To address the inconsistent findings from studies that used different models to explore the role of classical cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2) receptors in skeletal remodelling, we searched Medline, Web of Science and Embase for relevant studies from inception to June 23, 2020. We identified 38 in vitro, 34 in vivo and 9 human studies. A meta-analysis of in vitro studies showed that exposure to the inverse-agonists AM251 (mean difference [MD]:-26.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]:-45.36,-8.14, p = 0.005), AM630 (standardised[std.] MD:-3.11, CI:-5.26,-0.97, p = 0.004; SR144528, std.MD:-4.88, CI -7.58,-2.18, p = 0.0004) and CBD (std.MD:-1.39, CI -2.64,-0.14, p = 0.03) is associated with reduced osteoclastogenesis, whereas the endocannabinoid 2-AG (std.MD:2.00, CI:0.11-3.89, p = 0.04) and CB2-selective agonist HU308 (MD:19.38, CI:11.75-27.01, p < 0.00001) were stimulatory. HU308 also enhanced osteoblast differentiation (std.MD:2.22, CI:0.95-3.50, p = 0.0006) and activity (std.MD:2.97, CI:1.22-4.71, p = 0.0008). In models of bone loss, CB1/2 deficiency enhanced peak bone volume (std.MD:3.70, CI:1.77-5.63, p = 0.0002) but reduced bone formation (std.MD:-0.54, CI:-0.90,-0.17, p = 0.004) in female mice. In male rats, CB1/2 deficiency (std.MD:2.31, CI:0.30-4.33, p = 0.02) and AM251 or CBD treatments (std.MD:2.19, CI:0.46-3.93, p = 0.01) enhanced bone volume. CB1/2 deficiency (std.MD:9.78, CI:4.96-14.61, p < 0.0001) and AM251 or AM630 treatments (std.MD:28.19, CI:19.13-37.25, p < 0.0001) were associated with osteoprotection. The CB2-selective agonists JWH133 and 4Q3C enhanced bone volume in arthritic rodents (std.MD:14.45, CI:2.08-26.81, p = 0.02). In human, CB2 SNPs (AA:rs2501431, MD:-0.28, CI:-0.55,-0.01, p = 0.04; CC:rs2501432, MD:-0.29, CI:-0.56,-0.02, p = 0.03) were associated with reduced bone mineral density, however the association of Marijuana use remains unclear. Thus, CB1/2 modulation is associated with altered bone metabolism, however findings are confounded by low study number and heterogenicity of models.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Here, we overview the latest findings from studies investigating the skeletal endocannabinoid (EC) system and its involvement in bone formation and resorption. RECENT FINDINGS The endocannabinoid system consists of endogenous ligands, receptors, and enzymes. The main cannabinoids found in the cannabis plant are Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 are expressed in bone and regulate bone homeostasis in rodents and humans. CBD treatment was shown to enhance fracture healing in rats. Recent studies in mice indicate that strain, age, and sex differences dictate the skeletal outcome of the EC activation. CBD treatment was shown to enhance bone healing, but needs validation in clinical trials. While research shows that EC activity protects against bone loss, studies on CB1 and CB2 agonists in bone regeneration models are lacking. Whether modulating the EC system would affect bone repair remains therefore an open question worth investigating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bitya Raphael-Mizrahi
- Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Yankel Gabet
- Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crosstalk of Brain and Bone-Clinical Observations and Their Molecular Bases. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21144946. [PMID: 32668736 PMCID: PMC7404044 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
As brain and bone disorders represent major health issues worldwide, substantial clinical investigations demonstrated a bidirectional crosstalk on several levels, mechanistically linking both apparently unrelated organs. While multiple stress, mood and neurodegenerative brain disorders are associated with osteoporosis, rare genetic skeletal diseases display impaired brain development and function. Along with brain and bone pathologies, particularly trauma events highlight the strong interaction of both organs. This review summarizes clinical and experimental observations reported for the crosstalk of brain and bone, followed by a detailed overview of their molecular bases. While brain-derived molecules affecting bone include central regulators, transmitters of the sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory nervous system, bone-derived mediators altering brain function are released from bone cells and the bone marrow. Although the main pathways of the brain-bone crosstalk remain ‘efferent’, signaling from brain to bone, this review emphasizes the emergence of bone as a crucial ‘afferent’ regulator of cerebral development, function and pathophysiology. Therefore, unraveling the physiological and pathological bases of brain-bone interactions revealed promising pharmacologic targets and novel treatment strategies promoting concurrent brain and bone recovery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Arlt H, Mullarkey T, Hu D, Baron R, Ominsky MS, Mitlak B, Lanske B, Besschetnova T. Effects of abaloparatide and teriparatide on bone resorption and bone formation in female mice. Bone Rep 2020; 13:100291. [PMID: 32637467 PMCID: PMC7330158 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Intermittent administration of PTH type 1 receptor (PTH1R) agonists increases bone remodeling, with greater stimulation of bone formation relative to bone resorption causing net gains in bone mass. This pharmacodynamic feature underlies the bone-building effects of teriparatide and abaloparatide, the only PTH1R agonists approved to reduce osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women. This study in 8-week-old female mice compared bone resorption and formation responses to these agents delivered at the same 10 μg/kg dose, and a 40 μg/kg abaloparatide dose was also included to reflect its 4-fold higher approved clinical dose. Peptides or vehicle were administered by daily supra-calvarial subcutaneous injection for 12 days, and local (calvarial) and systemic (L5 vertebral and tibial) responses were evaluated by histomorphometry. Terminal bone histomorphometry data indicated that calvarial resorption cavities were similar in both abaloparatide groups versus vehicle controls, whereas the teriparatide group had more calvarial resorption cavities compared with the vehicle or abaloparatide 40 μg/kg groups. The bone resorption marker serum CTX was significantly lower in the abaloparatide 40 μg/kg group and similar in the other two active treatment groups compared with vehicle controls. Both peptides increased trabecular bone formation rate (BFR) in L5 and proximal tibia versus vehicle, and L5 BFR was higher with abaloparatide 40 μg/kg versus teriparatide. At the tibial diaphysis, periosteal BFR was higher with abaloparatide 40 μg/kg versus vehicle or teriparatide, and endocortical BFR was higher with teriparatide but not with abaloparatide 10 or 40 μg/kg versus vehicle. Few differences in structural or microarchitectural bone parameters were observed with this brief duration of treatment. In summary, calvarial bone resorption cavity counts were higher in the teriparatide group versus the vehicle and abaloparatide 40 μg/kg groups, and the abaloparatide 40 μg/kg group had lower serum CTX versus vehicle. L5 and tibial trabecular bone formation indices were higher in all three active treatment groups versus vehicle. The abaloparatide 40 μg/kg group had higher L5 trabecular BFR and tibial periosteal BFR versus teriparatide, whereas tibial endocortical BFR was higher with teriparatide but not abaloparatide. Together, these findings in female mice indicate that an improved balance of bone formation versus bone resorption is established shortly after initiating treatment with abaloparatide. PTH receptor (PTH-R) agonists increase bone density by stimulating bone formation. PTH-R agonists differ in their propensity to increase bone resorption. Female mice were treated for 12 d with PTH-R agonists abaloparatide or teriparatide. The systemic resorption marker serum CTX was lower with abaloparatide vs vehicle. Calvarial resorption cavities were higher with teriparatide but not abaloparatide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dorothy Hu
- Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roland Baron
- Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|