Therapeutic effects of methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with borderline intellectual functioning or intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

BACKGROUND

There are now hundreds of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) of variable quality. To help navigate this literature, we have reviewed systematic reviews on any topic on ADHD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and performed quality assessment according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. A total of 231 systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ADHD was 7.2% for children and adolescents and 2.5% for adults, though with major uncertainty due to methodological variation in the existing literature. There is evidence for both biological and social risk factors for ADHD, but this evidence is mostly correlational rather than causal due to confounding and reverse causality. There is strong evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment on symptom reduction in the short-term, particularly for stimulants. However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in mitigating adverse life trajectories such as educational attainment, employment, substance abuse, injuries, suicides, crime, and comorbid mental and somatic conditions. Pharmacotherapy is linked with side effects like disturbed sleep, reduced appetite, and increased blood pressure, but less is known about potential adverse effects after long-term use. Evidence of the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments is mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite hundreds of systematic reviews on ADHD, key questions are still unanswered. Evidence gaps remain as to a more accurate prevalence of ADHD, whether documented risk factors are causal, the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments on any outcomes, and pharmacotherapy in mitigating the adverse outcomes associated with ADHD.

Predicting the Response of Children and Adolescents With ADHD to Methylphenidate: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To report the characteristics associated with response to methylphenidate (MPH) in children and adolescents with ADHD.

METHODS

Studies reporting potentials predictors of response to MPH were searched in Medline and Embase from January 1998 to March 2022. Narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven reports of 46 studies totaling 6,656 ADHD patients were included. No association appears between response to MPH and age, gender, MPH dosage, ADHD subtype, comorbidities nor socioeconomic status when considering a specific patient. No conclusion could be drawn about body weight, ADHD severity, intelligence quotient, and parental symptoms of depression or ADHD.

CONCLUSIONS

None of these potential predictors have proven their usefulness to predict response to MPH on an individual basis in clinical practice. In research, potential predictors should be measured, their association with response to MPH assessed, in order to control for confounding variables when modeling response to MPH.

International consensus recommendations for the identification and treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND)

BACKGROUND

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is associated with a wide range of physical manifestations for which international clinical recommendations for diagnosis and management have been established. TSC is, however, also associated with a wide range of TSC-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND) that are typically under-identified and under-treated yet associated with a profound burden of disease. The contemporary evidence base for the identification and treatment of TAND is much more limited and, to date, consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of TAND have also been limited and non-specific.

METHODS

The TANDem project was launched with an international, interdisciplinary, and participatory consortium of 24 individuals, including TSC family representatives, from all World Health Organization (WHO) regions but one. One of the aims of the TANDem project was to generate consensus recommendations for the identification and treatment of TAND. At the time of this project, no internationally adopted standard methodology and methodological checklists existed for the generation of clinical practice recommendations. We therefore developed our own systematic procedure for evidence review and consensus-building to generate evidence-informed consensus recommendations of relevance to the global TSC community.

RESULTS

At the heart of the consensus recommendations are ten core principles surrounded by cluster-specific recommendations for each of the seven natural TAND clusters identified in the literature (autism-like, dysregulated behavior, eat/sleep, mood/anxiety, neuropsychological, overactive/impulsive, and scholastic) and a set of wraparound psychosocial cluster recommendations. The overarching recommendation is to "screen" for TAND at least annually, to "act" using appropriate next steps for evaluation and treatment, and to "repeat" the process to ensure early identification and early intervention with the most appropriate biological, psychological, and social evidence-informed approaches to support individuals with TSC and their families.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus recommendations should provide a systematic framework to approach the identification and treatment of TAND for health, educational, social care teams and families who live with TSC. To ensure global dissemination and implementation of these recommendations, partnerships with the international TSC community will be important. One of these steps will include the generation of a "TAND toolkit" of "what to seek" and "what to do" when difficulties are identified in TAND clusters.

Efficacy and tolerability of psychostimulants for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There was no previous meta-analysis investigating the efficacy/tolerability of psychostimulants for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschool children.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on therapeutic efficacy of psychostimulants against ADHD symptoms in preschool children (age ≤6 years) compared with placebos. Primary outcomes were (a) changes in ADHD symptoms evaluated by validated rating scales from parents'/teacher's observation, or (b) post-intervention improvements in neuropsychological performance. Secondary outcomes were risks of adverse events.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of nine eligible trials including 544 preschool children (mean age=4.86 years, female=11.98%, median treatment duration=4.33 weeks) supported the efficacy of psychostimulants against global symptoms from observations of parents (Hedges' g=0.6152, p<0.0001) and teachers (Hedges' g=0.6563, p=0.0039). Efficacy of psychostimulants was also noted against symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, especially the latter (i.e., main symptoms in preschool children). Moreover, male gender, older age, and longer treatment duration were associated with better efficacy. Regarding adverse events, only the risk of poor appetite was higher in the psychostimulant group (odds ratio [OR]=2.39). However, the qualities of evidence were low to very low, indicating potential discrepancy between the true and estimated effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that psychostimulants might be beneficial for preschool children with ADHD, especially hyperactivity/impulsivity from teachers' observation, with tolerable side effects. Nevertheless, the true magnitude of the effect needs to be confirmed with more research due to low to very low certainty of the evidence.

A novel genetic variant potentially altering the expression of MANBA in the cerebellum associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Han Chinese children

OBJECTIVES

To obtain additional insight into the genetic factors of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHODS

First, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) integrating human cerebellum-specific variant-expression/splicing correlations to identify ADHD susceptibility genes. Then, the associations between expression/splicing quantitative trait loci (eQTLs/sQTLs) of the transcriptome-wide significant genes and ADHD were observed in a case-control study of Han Chinese children. Furthermore, dual luciferase reporter gene assays were performed to validate the regulatory function of ADHD risk variants. Additionally, the transcription level of target genes in blood was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay.

RESULTS

TWAS identified that the genetically regulated expression of MANBA in the cerebellum was significantly associated with ADHD risk. Furthermore, we observed a higher risk of ADHD and more severe clinical symptoms in subjects harbouring heterozygous (TC) or mutant homozygous (TT) genotypes of MANBA rs1054037 than CC carriers. The dual luciferase reporter gene assay revealed that the mutation of rs1054037(C > T) potentially upregulated MANBA expression by eliminating the binding site for hsa-miR-5591-3P. Finally, RT-qPCR showed that MANBA expression in blood samples of patients was significantly higher than that of controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest a role of MANBA in the development of ADHD.

An Shen Ding Zhi Ling Ameliorates the Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder via Modulating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-Related Signaling Pathways

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder. It may impact the cognitive and social functions throughout childhood and determine adult outcomes. Dopamine (DA) deficiency theory is the pathogenesis of ADHD that is recognized by most international literature. Existing studies have shown that DA deficiency is caused by the abnormal function of the DA transporter and an imbalance in the DA receptor functionality. Recent clinical and experimental studies have found that the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling pathway acts a pivotal part in DA vesicle circulation and ADHD pathogenesis. An Shen Ding Zhi Ling (ASDZL) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription, which was widely prescribed to treat ADHD in Jiangsu, China, but its therapeutic mechanism is unclear. Therefore, we constructed a spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model to explain its mechanism. SHRs were randomly assigned to four groups: SHR model group (vehicle), methylphenidate hydrochloride group (MPH), ASDZL group, and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone group (7,8-DHF). At the same time, the above groups were given continuous medication for four weeks. The results show that ASDZL, MPH, and 7,8-DHF group could significantly improve the spatial memory of SHRs in the Morris water maze tests. ASDZL increased the levels of BDNF, TrkB, p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75), C-Jun N-terminal kinases 1 (JNK1), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus synaptosome of SHRs. The results of this study suggest that ASDZL can relieve the symptoms of ADHD in SHRs by regulating the balance between the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway (promoting vesicle circulation) and the BDNF/P75/JNK1/NF-κB signaling pathway (inhibiting vesicle circulation) within the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome to increase the DA concentration in the synaptic cleft. The BDNF/TrkB signal pathway within the PFC and hippocampus synaptosome was activated by 7,8-DHF to increase DA concentration in the synaptic cleft. Whether 7,8-DHF can activate or inhibit the BDNF/P75 signaling pathway remains unclear.

Two meta-analyses of the association between atopic diseases and core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Studies in the field of neuroscience and psychology have hypothesized that a causal association exists between atopic diseases and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported a higher risk of ADHD in children with atopic diseases; however, the relationship between ADHD symptoms and atopic diseases remains unclear. We systematically reviewed observational cross-sectional and longitudinal studies to investigate the relationship between atopic diseases and ADHD symptom severity (hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention). The majority of studies showed a statistically significant association between atopic diseases and both ADHD symptoms, with substantial heterogeneity in the outcome of hyperactivity/impulsivity. Remarkably decreased heterogeneity and statistical significance were observed in the second meta-analysis of ADHD-related behavior symptoms in atopic patients without ADHD. Our study indicated that atopic diseases not only associated with ADHD but also ADHD symptoms severity. This association was even observed in children with subthreshold ADHD, indicating that atopic diseases may play a role in the spectrum of ADHD symptom severity. Trial registration: This study was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42020213219).

Psychiatric Comorbidities in 1p36 Deletion Syndrome and Their Treatment-A Case Report

1p36 deletion syndrome represents the most common terminal deletion observed in humans. Major clinical findings comprise developmental delay/intellectual disability, poor or absent expressive language, congenital central muscular hypotonia, brain anomalies, brachydactyly/camptodactyly, short feet, and characteristic facial features like straight eyebrows, deep-set eyes, and midface hypoplasia. So far, there is very limited knowledge about comorbid psychiatric disorders and their effective treatment in this special population. To fill this gap, this case report presents an initially four-year-old girl with 1p36.33-1p36.32 deletion, moderate intellectual disability, insomnia, oppositional-defiant disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder covering a period of time of about 1.5 years comprising initial psychological/psychiatric assessment, subsequent day clinic/outpatient treatment (amongst others including off-label use of melatonin and methylphenidate as well as parent-child interaction therapy) and follow-up assessment. Follow-up results indicated good efficacy of melatonin and methylphenidate medication without any adverse effects. Multidisciplinarity in diagnosis and treatment are mandatory to meet needs of patients with complex genetic disorders like 1p36 deletion syndrome. Off-label use of melatonin (for insomnia) and methylphenidate (for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) should be considered in young children with 1p36 deletion syndrome if behavioral interventions are not sufficient.

Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of the Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Its Receptor for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent chronic migraine (CM). Four mAbs acting on the CGRP or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent CM. The aim of current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of CGRP mAbs with onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate for CM. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CGRP mAbs and onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate in patients with CM. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted using the frequentist model. The primary outcomes were changes in the monthly migraine days and the 50% response rate. The safety was evaluated with acceptability (i.e., drop-out rate) and rate of any adverse event. This NMA of thirteen RCTs, which, in total, consisted of 5634 participants, demonstrated that a single 300 mg of eptinezumab (mean difference =  - 2.60 days, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) =  - 4.43 to - 0.77 compared with placebo) demonstrated the best improvement in monthly migraine days among all interventions. In addition, 675 mg fremanezumab in the first month followed by 225 mg in the second and third months (odds ratio (OR) = 2.96, 95% CIs = 2.20 to 3.97 compared to placebo) was associated with the best response rate among all the interventions. Monthly 140 mg erenumab (MD =  - 2.50 days, 95% CIs =  - 3.83 to - 1.17 compared with placebo) was the best choice for reducing the number of acute migraine-specific medication use days. The safety analysis revealed that loading dose of 240 mg galcanezumab and monthly 240 mg (OR = 0.43, 95% CIs = 0.22 to 0.84) was associated with the lowest drop-out rate; loading dose fremanezumab 675 mg and monthly 675 mg (OR = 1.44, 95% CIs = 1.10 to 1.89), loading dose of 240 mg galcanezumab and monthly 120 mg (OR = 1.37, 95% CIs = 1.02 to 1.84), and single dose of fremanezumab 675 mg (OR = 1.35, 95% CIs = 1.00 to 1.83) were associated with significantly higher rates of AEs than the placebo/control groups. Our NMA indicated that all four CGRP mAbs demonstrated excellent safety, acceptability, and efficacy profiles compared to the traditional prophylaxis for CM. However, because there are several limitations, the findings of the current NMA should be taken into consideration with caution.

The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder

BACKGROUND

Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base.

METHODS

We reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder.

RESULTS

We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents.

CONCLUSIONS

Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma.

Commentary: Identifying individualized predictions of response in ADHD pharmacotherapy - a commentary on Rodrigues et al. (2020)

In this issue, Rodrigues et al. (2020) present a systematic review with meta-analyses that reports the efficacy of five treatments for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in the context of autism spectrum disorder - (a) methylphenidate; (b) atomoxetine; (c) guanfacine; (d) aripiprazole; and (e) risperidone. In this commentary, we highlight the contrast between the scarce evidence base of treatment for ADHD in the context of autism and other subpopulations, such as tic disorders and intellectual disability, and the extensive evidence base of treatment for ADHD in general. The commentary weighs about the conundrum clinicians face of whether to rely on the limited evidence base of treatment for ADHD in subpopulation, or to derive conclusions from the larger body of evidence of treatment for ADHD in general. The commentary also discusses potential avenues for future research to address this clinical problem.

Efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological, psychosocial, and brain stimulation interventions in children and adolescents with mental disorders: an umbrella review

Top-tier evidence on the safety/tolerability of 80 medications in children/adolescents with mental disorders has recently been reviewed in this jour-nal. To guide clinical practice, such data must be combined with evidence on efficacy and acceptability. Besides medications, psychosocial inter-ventions and brain stimulation techniques are treatment options for children/adolescents with mental disorders. For this umbrella review, we systematically searched network meta-analyses (NMAs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating 48 medications, 20 psychosocial interventions, and four brain stimulation techniques in children/adolescents with 52 different mental disorders or groups of mental disorders, reporting on 20 different efficacy/acceptability outcomes. Co-primary outcomes were disease-specific symptom reduction and all-cause discontinuation ("acceptability"). We included 14 NMAs and 90 MAs, reporting on 15 mental disorders or groups of mental disorders. Overall, 21 medications outperformed placebo regarding the co-primary outcomes, and three psychosocial interventions did so (while seven outperformed waiting list/no treatment). Based on the meta-analytic evidence, the most convincing efficacy profile emerged for amphetamines, methylphenidate and, to a smaller extent, behavioral therapy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; aripiprazole, risperidone and several psychosocial interventions in autism; risperidone and behavioral interventions in disruptive behavior disorders; several antipsychotics in schizophrenia spectrum disorders; fluoxetine, the combination of fluoxetine and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and interpersonal therapy in depression; aripiprazole in mania; fluoxetine and group CBT in anxiety disorders; fluoxetine/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, CBT, and behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention in obsessive-compulsive disorder; CBT in post-traumatic stress disorder; imipramine and alarm behavioral intervention in enuresis; behavioral therapy in encopresis; and family therapy in anorexia nervosa. Results from this umbrella review of interventions for mental disorders in children/adolescents provide evidence-based information for clinical decision making.

The impact of antiseizure medications on polysomnographic parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oral antiseizure medications (ASMs) are first-line treatments for patients with epilepsy. However, ASMs may alter sleep architecture, adversely affecting patient outcomes. The meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the effect of ASMs on sleep architecture.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central database (up to Febrary 2021) were searched for randomized control trials (RCT) with effects of ASMs on polysomnography parameters. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. We did not set limitation to the participants with underlying diagnosis of epilepsy.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized-controlled trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The effects of five main groups of ASMs (sodium channel blockers, calcium channel blockers, GABA enhancers, synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A [SV2A] ligand, and broad-spetrum ASMs) on slow-wave sleep (SWS), rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and sleep efficiency (SE) were analyzed. Compared with placebo, calcium channel blockers and GABA enhancers significantly increased SWS. GABA enhancers also decreased REM sleep percentage, whereas calcium channel blockers significantly increased SE. Sodium channel blockers, SV2A ligand and broad-spectrum ASMs did not affect SWS, REM sleep, or SE. The subgroup analysis revealed that gabapentin, pregabalin, and tiagabine increased the percentage of SWS. Tiagabine also decreased REM sleep, whereas pregabalin increased SE. Finally, levetiracetam did not affect SWS, REM sleep, and SE.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that ASMs can have a statistically significant effect on sleep parameters; the effect differs between ASMs.