Tumor sidedness influences prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery

Prognostic value of tumor deposits and positive lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In colorectal cancer (CRC), tumor deposits (TD) have been used to guide the N staging only in node-negative patients. It remains unknown about the prognostic value of TD in combination with positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors analyzed data from 31 139 eligible patients diagnosed with stage III CRC, including 30 230 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as a training set and 909 from two Chinese hospitals as a validation set. The associations of TD and LNR with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Both TD-positive and high LNR (value ≥0.4) were associated with worse CSS in the training [multivariable hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% CI: 1.43-1.58 and HR, 1.74; 95% CI: 1.62-1.86, respectively] and validation sets (HR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.41-2.54 and HR, 2.01; 95% CI: 1.29-3.15, respectively). Compared to patients with TD-negative and low LNR (value<0.4), those with TD-positive and high LNR had a 4.09-fold risk of CRC-specific death in the training set (HR, 4.09; 95% CI: 3.54-4.72) and 4.60-fold risk in the validation set (HR, 4.60; 95% CI: 2.88-7.35). Patients with TD-positive/H-LNR CRC on the right side had the worst prognosis ( P <0.001). The combined variable of TD and LNR contributed the most to CSS prediction in the training (24.26%) and validation (32.31%) sets. A nomogram including TD and LNR showed satisfactory discriminative ability, and calibration curves indicated favorable consistency in both the training and validation sets.

CONCLUSIONS

TD and LNR represent independent prognostic predictors for stage III CRC. A combination of TD and LNR could be used to identify those at high-risk of CRC deaths.

Prognostic value of primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis

The clinical, histological, and molecular differences between right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (RCC) have received considerable attention. Over the past decade, many articles have been published concerning the association between primary tumor location (PTL) of colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing need for an updated meta-analysis integrating the outcomes of recent studies to determine the prognostic role of right vs left-sidedness of PTL in patients with colorectal cancer. We conducted a comprehensive database review using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library databases from February 2016 to March 2023 for prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of RCC compared with LCC. A total of 60 cohort studies comprising 1,494,445 patients were included in the meta-analysis. We demonstrated that RCC is associated with a significantly increased risk of death compared with LCC by 25% (hazard ratio (HR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.31; I2 = 78.4%; Z = 43.68). Results showed that patients with RCC have a worse OS compared with LCC only in advanced stages (Stage III: HR, 1.275; 95% CI 1.16-1.4; P = 0.0002; I2 = 85.8%; Stage IV: HR, 1.34; 95% CI 1.25-1.44; P < 0.0001; I2 = 69.2%) but not in primary stages (Stage I/II: HR, 1.275; 95% CI 1.16-1.4; P = 0.0002; I2 = 85.8%). Moreover, a meta-analysis of 13 studies including 812,644 patients revealed that there is no significant difference in CSS between RCC and LCC (HR, 1.121; 95% CI 0.97-1.3; P = 0.112). Findings from the present meta-analysis highlight the importance of PTL in clinical decision-making for patients with CRC, especially in advanced stages. We provide further evidence supporting the hypothesis that RCC and LCC are distinct disease entities that should be managed differently.

Immunohistochemical expression of apolipoprotein B and 4-hydroxynonenal proteins in colorectal carcinoma patients: a retrospective study

AIM

To assess the association of the expression of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE) with the clinicopathological data of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We obtained 80 CRC histopathological specimens sent to the Pathology Laboratory of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from 2015 to 2019. Data on demographic factors, body mass index (BMI), and clinicopathological characteristics were also collected. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were stained by using an optimized immunohistochemical protocol.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly older than 50 years, male, Malay, and overweight or obese. A high apoB expression was observed in 87.5% CRC samples (70/80), while a high 4HNE expression was observed in only 17.5% (14/80) of CRCs. The expression of apoB was significantly associated with the sigmoid and rectosigmoid tumor sites (p =0.001) and tumor size 3-5 cm (p =0.005). 4HNE expression was significantly associated with tumor size 3-5 cm (p =0.045). Other variables were not significantly associated with the expression of either marker.

CONCLUSION

ApoB and 4HNE proteins may play a role in promoting CRC carcinogenesis.

Immunohistochemical expression of apolipoprotein B and 4-hydroxynonenal proteins in colorectal carcinoma patients: a retrospective study

AIM

To assess the association of the expression of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE) with the clinicopathological data of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We obtained 80 CRC histopathological specimens sent to the Pathology Laboratory of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from 2015 to 2019. Data on demographic factors, body mass index (BMI), and clinicopathological characteristics were also collected. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were stained by using an optimized immunohistochemical protocol.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly older than 50 years, male, Malay, and overweight or obese. A high apoB expression was observed in 87.5% CRC samples (70/80), while a high 4HNE expression was observed in only 17.5% (14/80) of CRCs. The expression of apoB was significantly associated with the sigmoid and rectosigmoid tumor sites (p =0.001) and tumor size 3-5 cm (p =0.005). 4HNE expression was significantly associated with tumor size 3-5 cm (p =0.045). Other variables were not significantly associated with the expression of either marker.

CONCLUSION

ApoB and 4HNE proteins may play a role in promoting CRC carcinogenesis.

Risk factors of central area lymph nodes metastasis for guiding optimal right colon cancer surgery: A retrospective multicenter study.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1991182/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: D3 or CME lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer (RCC) with lymph nodes metastasis (LNM) is strongly recommended but the anatomical landmark remains controversial. Central LNM predicted poor prognosis in RCC and determined the extent of lymphadenectomy. Methods: Data for 1712 RCC patients treated with D3/CME lymphadenectomy were reviewed. These patients had been treated in 9 centers. A total of 1023 RCC patients were enrolled in the derivation cohort while 689 patients were enrolled in the validation cohort. Results: The overall central LNM incidence was 12.58% (215/1712). In the derivation cohort, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses revealed that preoperative N staging based on CT scan (OR=7.85, 95% CI, 4.53-14.51, p<0.001), tumor differentiation (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.01) and intraoperative view of tumor movability (OR=0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p=0.02) were significant independent factors. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for assessing central LNM in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.802 and 0.750, respectively. The risk-scoring system for patients with RCC was also established. A score of 0 points was the optimal cut-off value for central LNM. Compared to patients in the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk group exhibited worse overall survival outcomes (p<0.001).Conclusions: The established model can be used for preoperative assessment of the risk of central LNM in RCC patients, and for determining the landmark for D3/CME lymphadenectomy, therefore might contribute to decreased therapeutic complications and improved clinical outcomes.

Lymph node yield in the pathological staging of resected nonmetastatic colon cancer: The more the better?

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend regional lymphadenectomy with a lymph node yield (LNY) of at least 12 lymph nodes (LN) for adequate colon cancer (CC) staging. LNY ≥22LN may improve survival, especially in right-sided CC [Lee et al., Surg Oncol, 27(3), 2018]. This multicentric retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of LNY and tumor laterality on CC staging and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-III CC that underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 were grouped according to LNY: <22 and ≥ 22. Primary outcomes were LN positivity (N+ rate) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome. Exploratory analyses were performed for laterality and stage.

RESULTS

We included 795 patients (417 < 22LN, 378 ≥ 22LN); 53% had left-sided CC and 29%/37%/38% had stage I/II/III tumors. There was no association between LNY ≥22LN and N+ rate after adjustment for grade, T stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion; a trend for a higher N+ rate in left-sided CC was identified (interaction p = 0.033). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months for DFS and 73.2 months for OS, 254 patients (31.9%) relapsed and 207 (26.0%) died. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, ASA score, laparoscopic approach, T/N stage, mucinous histology, LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy, LNY ≥22LN was significantly associated with both DFS (HR 0.75, p = 0.031) and OS (HR 0.71, p = 0.025). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a more significant benefit for right-sided CC.

CONCLUSION

LNY ≥22LN was associated with longer DFS and OS in patients with operable CC, especially for right-sided CC.

Comparison of Resected Malignant Tumors of the Right- and Left-Sided Colon—Is There a Difference?

Embryological, anatomical, and immunological differences between the right-sided and left-sided colons are well known, but the difference in oncological behavior of colon tumors has only recently become the main subject of studies. Published articles propose that there is a difference not only in symptoms, but also in survival. Our aim was to analyze the clinicopathological and oncological differences among our patients who had been operated for colon cancer in our department. We examined the historical data of our patients who underwent colon resection for malignancy between 1st of January 2016 and 31st of December 2018. Tumor markers, histological results, postoperative complications, and oncological therapies were investigated. The primary outcome was overall survival. We analyzed our patients’ survival data with Kaplan–Meier log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. In our study, 267 patients were enrolled. One hundred thirty-three (49.8%) patients had right-sided colon cancer; 134 (50.2%) patients had left-sided colon cancer. Patients with right-sided colon cancer were significantly more likely to have mucinous adenocarcinoma (p = 0.037). No significant differences were revealed in overall survival between right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colon cancer patients (p = 0.381). Additional subgroup analysis showed that there were no significant differences in overall survival for laterality neither in the metastatic group (p = 0.824) nor in the non-metastatic group (p = 0.345). Based on the conflicting previous study results, our findings repeatedly highlight that the relationship between tumor location in the colon and overall survival is not straightforward.

Tumor Size >5 cm and Harvested LNs <12 Are the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Stage I Colon and Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection

Simple Summary

We analyzed the data from 1952 patients with stage I colorectal cancer to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence and survival rates. In the entire cohort, the recurrence rate was 4.6%. There were some differences in the risk factors for recurrence between colon and rectal cancer in stage I colorectal cancer. Left-sided tumors, T2, tumor size >5 cm, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of colon cancer recurrence. Male, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥2.5 ng/mL, and harvested lymph nodes (LNs) <12 were independently associated with recurrence of rectal cancer. Even though patients with early-stage CRC underwent curative resection, survival sharply decreased in cases of recurrence. Our findings could suggest more aggressive surveillance for patients with an increased risk of recurrence.

Abstract

Recurrence can still occur even after radical resection of stage I colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to identify subgroups with a high risk for recurrence in the stage I CRC. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 1952 patients with stage I CRC after radical resection between 2002 and 2017 at our institute. 1398 (colon, 903 (64.6%), rectum, 495 (35.4%)) were eligible for analysis. We analyzed the risk factors for recurrence and survival. During the follow-up period (median: 59 months), 63 (4.6%) had a recurrence. The recurrence rate of rectal cancer was significantly higher than that of colon cancer (8.5% vs. 2.3%). Left-sided tumors, T2, tumor size >5 cm, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of colon cancer recurrence. Male, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥2.5 ng/mL, and harvested lymph nodes (LNs) <12 were independently associated with recurrence of rectal cancer. Recurrence affected OS (5-year OS: 97.1% vs. 67.6%). Despite curative resection, survival sharply decreased with recurrence. The risk factors for recurrence were different between colon and rectal cancer. Patients with a higher risk for recurrence should be candidates for more aggressive surveillance, even in early-stage CRC.

The effect of comprehensive nursing on the recovery speed and prognosis of elderly colon cancer patients

To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing on the recovery speed and prognosis of elderly colon cancer patients. A total of 110 elderly patients undergoing colon cancer surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected and divided into a control group (n=55, routine care) and an observation group (n=55, comprehensive nursing) according to the random number table method. The post-care stress state index score, surgical tolerance, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, satisfaction, gastrointestinal quality of life index and other conditions were compared. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and other indicators scores in observation group were lower than those in the control group; the observation group had shorter postoperative hospital stay, bed time, first defecating time, first anal exhaust time; the postoperative complication rate of the observation group was 9.09%, which was lower than 25.45% of the control group; the satisfaction rate of the observation group was 94.55%, which was higher than 78.18% of the control group. All the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (inter-group effect: F=172.100, P<0.001). The GIQLI score of both groups increased with time (time effect: F=69.270, P<0.001), and the grouping and time had an interactive effect (interactive effect: F=7.186, P<0.001). The application of comprehensive nursing in elderly patients with colon cancer has a remarkable effect. It can promote the rehabilitation of patients and improve the prognosis, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.

Examining More Lymph Nodes May Improve the Prognosis of Patients With Right Colon Cancer: Determining the Optimal Minimum Lymph Node Count

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to determine the optimal minimum lymph node examination number for right colon cancer (RCC) patients.

METHODS

We comprehensively analysed the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database data from 2004 to 2016 to determine the 13-year trend in the number of lymph nodes examined among 108,703 left colon cancer and 165,937 RCC patients. 133,137 RCC patients eligible for inclusion were used to determine the optimal minimum for lymph node examination. We used restricted cubic splines to analyse the dose-response relationship between the number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis. X-tiles and decision trees were used to determine the optimal cutoff for the number of lymph nodes based on the survival outcomes of patients with RCC. The Kaplan-Meier method and COX model were used to estimate the overall survival and independent prognostic factors, and a prediction model was constructed. The C-index, calibration curve, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were used to determine the predictive performance of the model, and decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the benefits.

RESULTS

Lymph node examinations were common among colon cancer patients over the 13-year study period. It is generally agreed that at least 12 lymph nodes must be examined to ensure proper dissection and accurate staging of RCC; however, the optimal number of lymph nodes to be examined is controversial. The dose-response relationship indicated that 12 was not the optimal minimum number of lymph nodes for RCC patients. X-tile and survival decision-tree analysis indicated that 20 nodes was the optimal number. Survival analysis indicated that <20 nodes examined was a risk factor for poor prognosis, and the classification performance was superior for 20 nodes compared to 12 nodes.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node examination in RCC patients should be altered. Our research suggests that a 20-node measure may be more suitable for RCC patients.

Expression and regulation effects of chemokine receptor 7 in colon cancer cells

In China the incidence and mortality rates of colon cancer have been increasing annually. Studies have revealed that CXCR7 is expressed in many tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the function of CXCR7 in colon cancer. The expression level of chemokine receptor 7 (CXCR7) in Caco-2 and HCT116 cells was investigated to elucidate the effect of CXCR7 on cell biological behavior. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis were used to detect the expression level of CXCR7 in Caco-2 and HCT116 cells after transfection with small interfering (si)RNA. To analyze the in vitro biological function of CXCR7, cell proliferation was measured using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, and cell invasion and migration were measured using Matrigel, and Transwell and wound healing assays. siRNAs were successfully transfected into Caco-2 and HCT116 cells and resulted in a decrease in CXCR7 protein and mRNA expression. Downregulation of CXCR7 inhibited Caco-2 and HCT116 cell proliferation, invasion, and migration. Regulation of CXCR7 expression may affect the biological behavior of Caco-2 and HCT116 cells, suggesting that CXCR7 has a potential role in molecular therapy in colon cancer.