Lymph node yield in the pathological staging of resected nonmetastatic colon cancer: The more the better?

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend regional lymphadenectomy with a lymph node yield (LNY) of at least 12 lymph nodes (LN) for adequate colon cancer (CC) staging. LNY ≥22LN may improve survival, especially in right-sided CC [Lee et al., Surg Oncol, 27(3), 2018]. This multicentric retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of LNY and tumor laterality on CC staging and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-III CC that underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 were grouped according to LNY: <22 and ≥ 22. Primary outcomes were LN positivity (N+ rate) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome. Exploratory analyses were performed for laterality and stage.

RESULTS

We included 795 patients (417 < 22LN, 378 ≥ 22LN); 53% had left-sided CC and 29%/37%/38% had stage I/II/III tumors. There was no association between LNY ≥22LN and N+ rate after adjustment for grade, T stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion; a trend for a higher N+ rate in left-sided CC was identified (interaction p = 0.033). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months for DFS and 73.2 months for OS, 254 patients (31.9%) relapsed and 207 (26.0%) died. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, ASA score, laparoscopic approach, T/N stage, mucinous histology, LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy, LNY ≥22LN was significantly associated with both DFS (HR 0.75, p = 0.031) and OS (HR 0.71, p = 0.025). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a more significant benefit for right-sided CC.

CONCLUSION

LNY ≥22LN was associated with longer DFS and OS in patients with operable CC, especially for right-sided CC.

Abstract OT2-27-01: Solti-1718 NEREA Trial: Neratinib in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative HER2-enriched (HER2-E) advanced breast cancer (BC)

Background HR+/HER2-negative BC represents ∼70% of all newly diagnosed breast tumors. BC is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease where intrinsic subtypes play a role. Non-luminal subtypes within HR+/HER2-negative disease do not benefit to the same extent from the standard of care treatments as the luminal subtypes. Thus, other strategies are needed. HER2-E subtype represents approximately 6.6-11.0% of HR+/HER2-negative tumors and is enriched in twice as many cases in metastatic tumors. According to EGF30008 trial, HER2-E advanced BC patients despite presenting poor outcomes across treatments showed benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. SOLTI-1718 NEREA aims to evaluate whether EGFR/ERBB2 axis inhibition by neratinib improves efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced HR+/HER2-negative disease resistant to endocrine treatment (ET). Methods SOLTI-1718 NEREA (NCT04460430) is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, and multinational phase II clinical trial following a Simon’s 2-stage design with one interim and one final efficacy analysis. Locally advanced or metastatic HER2-E (determined at metastatic sample), HR+/HER2-negative BC patients who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous ET (with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor) will be included. ≤ 1 prior line of chemotherapy will be allowed. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of neratinib in combination with ET in HER2-E, HR+/HER2-negative patients in terms of PFS6 by local assessment by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate at 6 months, overall response rate, duration of response, time to response and incidence, duration, and severity of adverse events. The treatment schedule will consist of neratinib 240 mg daily in combination with ET, with either exemestane, fulvestrant, or tamoxifen (as per the investigator´s decision). All patients will take prophylactic loperamide with an established dosing scheme during the first cycle and on-demand in subsequent cycles. Tumor assessments will be performed at baseline and every 8 weeks during the first year, and every 12 weeks thereafter. An interim analysis will be performed after 33 patients are evaluable. If 15 to 27 patients achieve a PFS at 6 months (PFS6), the trial will continue to the second stage, otherwise, it will be stopped for futility (&lt;15) or efficacy (≥28). A total of 56 evaluable patients will be included in stages I and II. The Spanish regulatory national competent authority approved the study on April 8th 2020. Recruitment started in July 2020. As of June 2021. Seven patients have been enrolled in 15 sites in Spain and 3 sites in Portugal. Acknowledgments: We thank PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC for their provision of Neratinib and financial contribution to the study.

Citation Format: Eva Ciruelos, Cristina Saura, Xavier González-Farré, Javier Salvador Bofill, Maria Vidal, Isabel Blancas, Elena López-Miranda, Maria Iglesias, Miriam Arumi, Mireia Margelí, Catarina Pulido, Serafin Morales, Fernando Henao, Pilar Sánchez, Sara Alves, Diogo Branco, Joan Manel Gasent, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Ana Godoy, José L. Passos-Coelho, Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní, Juan M Ferrero-Cafiero, Tomás Pascual, Aleix Prat. Solti-1718 NEREA Trial: Neratinib in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative HER2-enriched (HER2-E) advanced breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-27-01.

FAIRLANE, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant ipatasertib plus paclitaxel for early triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This hypothesis-generating trial evaluated neoadjuvant ipatasertib-paclitaxel for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized phase II trial, patients with early TNBC (T ≥ 1.5 cm, N0-2) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo (days 1-21 every 28 days) for 12 weeks before surgery. Co-primary end points were pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/TisN0) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and immunohistochemistry phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-low populations. Secondary end points included pCR rate in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors and pre-surgery response rates by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

pCR rates with ipatasertib versus placebo were 17% versus 13%, respectively, in the ITT population (N = 151), 16% versus 13% in the immunohistochemistry PTEN-low population (N = 35), and 18% versus 12% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup (N = 62). Rates of overall and complete response (CR) by MRI favored ipatasertib in all three populations (CR rate 39% versus 9% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup). Ipatasertib was associated with more grade ≥3 adverse events (32% versus 16% with placebo), especially diarrhea (17% versus 1%). Higher cycle 1 day 8 (C1D8) immune score was significantly associated with better response only in placebo-treated patients. All ipatasertib-treated patients with low immune scores and a CR had PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ipatasertib to 12 weeks of paclitaxel for early TNBC did not clinically or statistically significantly increase pCR rate, although overall response rate by MRI was numerically higher with ipatasertib. The antitumor effect of ipatasertib was most pronounced in biomarker-selected patients. Safety was consistent with prior experience of ipatasertib-paclitaxel. A T-cell-rich environment at C1D8 had a stronger association with improved outcomes in paclitaxel-treated patients than seen for baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This dependency may be overcome with the addition of AKT inhibition, especially in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT02301988.

The cancer registry as an ally in monitoring treatment effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the cancer registry database can be used to monitor treatment effectiveness using nivolumab treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as an example.

METHOD

An observational inception cohort was used, where all registered cases of NSCLC with authorisation to initiate treatment with nivolumab were monitored retrospectively to evaluate disease characteristics and response to prior treatments. Current exposure to nivolumab was prospectively characterised and treatment outcomes classified based on the clinical information registered in the patient medical record. The main outcome measure used to assess treatment effectiveness was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes considered were progression free survival (PFS) as a measure of effectiveness and occurrence of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) as a measure of safety. Data were analysed using SPSS, version 24.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients received treatment with nivolumab for NSCLC, between November 1st 2015 and July 31st 2016, and were registered in the database. The majority were non-squamous type (n=107). The median OS was 11.4 months {CI_95%: 11.1-11.7}, with a 1-year survival of 44%, in line with clinical trial data. Median PFS was 5.4 months {CI_95%: 2.8-7.9}. Treatment was discontinued in 82 cases, most frequently due to disease progression. There were 38 cases of ADRs documented in the patient medical chart, 21 of which led to treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

The analysed data suggest that the cancer registry is a powerful tool to monitor treatment effectiveness, although considerable investment is needed to improve the medical culture of recording treatment exposure, particularly documentation of ADRs.

Benefits and risks of adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid in stage II/III breast cancer. 10 years follow-up of the AZURE randomized clinical trial (BIG 01/04)

Adjuvant bisphosphonates improve disease outcomes in postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) but the long-term effects are poorly described. The AZURE trial (ISRCTN79831382) was designed to determine whether adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZOL) improves disease outcomes in EBC. Previous analyses showed no effect on overall outcomes but identified benefits in postmenopausal women. Here we present the long-term risks and benefits of adjuvant ZOL with 10-years follow-up.

Patients and methods

3360 patients with stage II/III breast cancer were included in an academic, international, phase III, randomized, open label trial. Patients were followed up on a regular schedule until 10 years. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to standard adjuvant systemic therapy +/− intravenous ZOL 4 mg every 3–4 weeks x6, and then at reduced frequency to complete 5 years treatment. The primary outcome was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included invasive DFS (IDFS), overall survival (OS), sites of recurrence, skeletal morbidity and treatment outcomes according to primary tumor amplification of the transcription factor, MAF. Pre-planned subgroup analyses focused on interactions between menopausal status and treatment effects.

Results

With a median follow up of 117 months [IQR 70.4–120.4), DFS and IDFS were similar in both arms (HR_DFS= 0.94, 95%CI = 0.84–1.06, p = 0.340; HR_IDFS= 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82–1.02, p = 0.116). However, outcomes remain improved with ZOL in postmenopausal women (HR_DFS= 0.82, 95%CI = 0.67–1.00; HR_IDFS= 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64–0.94). In the 79% of tested women with a MAF FISH negative tumor, ZOL improved IDFS (HR_IDFS= 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58–0.97) and OS HR_OS= 0.69, 95%CI = 0.50–0.94), irrespective of menopause. ZOL did not improve disease outcomes in MAF FISH + tumors. Bone metastases as a first DFS recurrence (B_DFS) were reduced with ZOL (HR_B-DFS= 0.76, 95%CI = 0.63–0.92, p = 0.005). ZOL reduced skeletal morbidity with fewer fractures and skeletal events after disease recurrence. 30 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the ZOL arm (1.8%) have occurred.

Conclusions

Disease benefits with adjuvant ZOL in postmenopausal early breast cancer persist at 10 years of follow-up. The biomarker MAF identified a patient subgroup that derived benefit from ZOL irrespective of menopausal status.

Treatment adoption and relative effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors compared to tamoxifen in early breast cancer: A multi-institutional observational study

BACKGROUND

Since 2005, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been the adjuvant treatment of choice for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer (BC). In this study we characterize the adoption of AIs in Portugal, variables associated with treatment administration, and compare its effectiveness (either in monotherapy or sequential therapy) to tamoxifen monotherapy (TAM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included postmenopausal women with stage I-III hormone receptor (HR) positive BC diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 and treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in four participating institutions.

RESULTS

Of the 1283 eligible patients, 527 (41%) received an AI (16% as monotherapy, 25% as sequential therapy) and 756 (59%) TAM. Patients treated with AI had less differentiated tumors, with higher TNM stage, and were more frequently HER2-positive. Use of AI also differed by center (use range from 33% to 75%, p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 6.3 years and controlling for clinicopathological and treatment characteristics, treatment with AI had a better overall survival (OS) when compared with TAM (adjusted-HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81).

CONCLUSION

AIs were successfully introduced as adjuvant treatment for HR-positive BC in Portuguese hospitals. Its use was influenced by tumor and patient characteristics, but also center of care. In this large cohort, AI use was associated with an OS benefit.

Hospital resource utilization and treatment cost of skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancer: estimation for the Portuguese National Health System

BACKGROUND

Skeletal-related events (SREs) occur frequently in patients with bone metastases as a result of breast (BC) and prostate (PC) cancers. They increase both morbidity and mortality and lead to extensive health-care resource utilization.

METHODS

Health care resource utilization by BC/PC patients with at least one SRE during the preceding 12 months was assessed through retrospective chart review. SRE-treatment costs were estimated using the Portuguese Ministry of Health cost database and analyzed using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

This study included 152 patients from nine hospitals. The mean (SD) annual SRE-treatment cost per patient was €5963 (€3646) and €5711 (€4347), for BC (n=121) and PC (n=31) patients, respectively. Mean cost per single episode ranged between €1485 (radiotherapy) and €13,203 (spinal cord compression). Early onset of bone metastasis (P = 0.03) and diagnosis of bone metastases at or after the occurrence of the first SRE (P < 0.001) were associated with higher SRE-treatment costs.

CONCLUSION

These results reveal the high hospital SRE-treatment costs, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and treatment, and identify key factors determining the economic value of therapies for patients with skeletal metastases.

[Guidelines for prevention of febrile neutropenia]

Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia are common consequences of some cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. This situation leads to modifications of the therapeutic regimen, conducting to either dose reduction or cycle delays. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors are commonly used to minimize chemotherapy cytotoxic effect on the granulocytic series. The objective of this study is to assess the available evidence in what concerns the efficacy and safety of granulocyte colony stimulating factors, in several settings of their use. An extensive bibliographic review was performed, including clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and international guidelines for neutropenia prophylaxis, which aims to establish recommendations on their use, in adequacy to the National reality.

Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia--report of a new c-mpl gene missense mutation

A 44-month old girl with congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, already with pancytopenia, underwent an unrelated allogeneic cord blood transplantation with recovery of normal blood cell counts. The patient was a compound heterozygote for two c-mpl missense mutations inherited from both parents, one of them, a G578A exon 4 mutation leading to a cysteine to tyrosine replacement of codon 193, previously unreported.

The aggressiveness of cancer care in the last three months of life: a retrospective single centre analysis

BACKGROUND

There is concern that terminally ill cancer patients are over treated with chemotherapy, even when such treatment is unlikely to palliate symptoms. The study objective was to evaluate the use of chemotherapy in the last three months of life in a cohort of adult patients with advanced solid tumours.

METHODS

All adult patients with solid tumours who died in our hospital in 2003 and received chemotherapy for advanced cancer, were included. Detailed data concerning chemotherapy and toxicity, in the last three months of life, were collected from patients' clinical charts.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were included. Median age was 61 years. Median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to death was 11 months. The proportion of patients who received chemotherapy in the last three months of life was 66% (n = 211), in the last month 37% and in the last two weeks 21%. Among patients who received chemotherapy in the last three months of life, 50% started a new chemotherapy regimen in this period and 14% in the last month. There was an increased probability of receiving chemotherapy in the last three months of life in younger patients and in patients with breast, ovarian and pancreatic carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

There was a large proportion of patients who received chemotherapy in the last three months of life, including initiation of a new regimen within the last 30 days. Thus, further study is needed to evaluate if such aggressive attitude results in better palliation of symptoms at the end of life.

Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection

Up to a third of autologous transplantation candidates fail to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood with chemotherapy and/or growth factor treatment, thus requiring innovative mobilization strategies. In total, 20 cancer patients unable to provide adequate PBPC products after a previous mobilization attempt were treated with ancestim (20 microg/kg/day s.c.) and filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day s.c.). In 16 patients, the pre-study mobilization was with filgrastim alone. Eight patients underwent single large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and 12 multiple standard volume leukaphereses (SVL) in both mobilizations. Pairwise comparison of peripheral blood CD34(+) cell concentrations on the day of first leukapheresis failed to document synergism - median CD34(+)/microl of 3.2 (<0.1 to 15.4) and 4.5 (1-28.56) for the pre-study and on-study mobilizations (P = 0.79, sign test), and 4.2 (<0.1-15.4) and 5 (1-28.56), respectively, for the 16 patients previously mobilized with filgrastim alone (P = 1, sign test). The number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected per unit of blood volume (BV) processed was similar in both mobilizations - median 0.1 x 10(6)/kg/BV and 0.09 x 10(6)/kg/BV, respectively (P = 1, sign test). In this phase II study, the combination of ancestim and filgrastim did not allow adequate PBPC mobilization and collection in patients with a previous suboptimal PBPC collection.

Human mammaglobin RT-PCR assay for detection of occult breast cancer cells in hematopoietic products

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was: (i) to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of mammaglobin as a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) marker of breast cancer cells; (ii) to determine the incidence of tumor cell contamination of hematopoietic samples from patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nested RT-PCR assay for mammaglobin was developed. Sensitivity was determined by serial dilution assays with breast cancer cell lines, human breast cancers and normal breast tissue. Specificity was evaluated in hematopoietic samples from healthy volunteers and patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors other than breast cancer.

RESULTS

The mammaglobin transcript was detected in all 15 breast cancers, one benign breast tumor and five normal breast tissues studied, as well as in three breast cancer cell lines, in dilutions as low as 10(-8). The transcript was not detected in any of 47 peripheral blood samples, 15 bone marrow aspirates and 28 peripheral blood progenitor cell samples from the three control populations. Mammaglobin mRNA was detected in 19 of 78 peripheral blood samples from patients with breast cancer starting systemic chemotherapy, as well as in five of 30 repeat samples collected before the fourth cycle of treatment. The transcript was also present in six of seven bone marrow aspirates from patients with metastatic disease, two of five with loco-regional disease, but not in the aspirate of two patients with thrombocytopenia and a previous history of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Human mammaglobin mRNA is a sensitive and specific marker of breast cancer cells and should be further studied as a molecular marker of tumor cell contamination of hematopoietic tissues.

Influence of the interval between the administration of doxorubicin and paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of bolus doxorubicin followed by a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel has high antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer, but is limited by unexpected cardiac toxicity. In contrast, the administration of the two drugs 16 h apart has similar antitumor activity but less cardiac toxicity. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of these drugs when doxorubicin administration preceded paclitaxel by 30 min or by 24 h.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 i.v. bolus) followed 24 h later by paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 i.v. over 3 h) for six cycles (four before and two after surgery). In one of the first two cycles doxorubicin preceded paclitaxel by 30 min instead of 24 h, with plasma sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis up to 48 h. Determination of drug levels in plasma was done by HPLC.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were included. No clinical cardiac toxicity was observed but five patients discontinued doxorubicin-paclitaxel treatment after four cycles because of a decrease in LVEF of at least 15% from baseline or to less than 50%. While paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were not changed, there was a 30% and an 80% increase in the AUC0, 24h for doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, respectively, when the drugs were administered 30 min instead of 24 h apart. Even when paclitaxel was given 24 h after doxorubicin, there was a rebound 240% increase in the plasma concentration of doxorubicinol.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel interferes with the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin leading to higher systemic exposure to both doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, which is more evident when the plasma concentration of the anthracyclines is higher. This interference may explain the higher incidence of cardiac toxicity observed when the two drugs are administered within a short interval.

Cytokeratin 20 is not a reliable molecular marker for occult breast cancer cell detection in hematological tissues

Cytokeratins are potential markers for epithelial cell detection in hematological tissues. Thus, we developed a nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy to detect cytokeratin 20 (CK20) mRNA and studied its sensitivity and specificity as a molecular marker of occult breast cancer cells. In cell dilution experiments with human breast cancer cell lines, the limit of detection was 1 tumor cell in 1,000 hematological cells. In RNA dilution experiments of breast cancer cells' RNA in E. Coli tRNA, the CK20 transcript was only detectable when at least 1 ng of total tumor RNA was present in a total of 1 microg of RNA mixture. In parallel experiments using colorectal cancer specimens, CK20 mRNA was detected with as little as 1 pg of total tumor RNA, suggesting a low level of CK20 mRNA expression in breast cancer cells. The CK20 transcript was detected in all six tumors and five hematological samples of breast cancer patients but in none of nine hematological cell lines. However, CK20 transcript was also detected in unfractionated nucleated cell population of hematological samples from 23 of 31 (74%) healthy volunteers and from 12 of 24 (50%) patients with hematological malignancies. When mononucleated and polymorphonucleated cell populations of hematological samples from these control groups were screened separately, CK20 expression was detected in 94% of polymorphonucleated cell fractions and in 44% of mononucleated cell subpopulations. Thus, we conclude that the low sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR detection of CK20 mRNA limits its usefulness for breast cancer cell detection in hematological products.

[The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells as an autologous hematopoietic support in high-dose chemotherapy. I. The rationale and results]

We review the rationale for PBPC transplantation and the results reported in the literature. In order to prolong complete remissions and increase cure rates, high-dose chemotherapy is frequently used in the treatment of selected neoplasias. Hematological toxicity can be overcome by the infusion of autologous hemopoietic progenitors. Recently, peripheral blood is being used as the preferred source for hemopoietic progenitors, since it allows faster hematopoietic recoveries when compared to progenitors harvested from bone marrow. An adequate graft is defined by its content in clonogenic progenitors (mainly CFU-GM) and CD34 positive cells; these two parameters need to be accurately determined by specific laboratory methods. PBPC grafts are harvested using cell separators during leukaphereses; to increase efficiency, hemopoietic progenitors are first mobilized into the circulation with growth factors and or chemotherapy. PBSC transplantation may have procedure-associated toxicity related to the mobilization, harvest or reinfusion of the graft.

[The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells as an autologous hematopoietic support in high-dose chemotherapy. II. The experience of the Hematological Intensive Care Unit of the IPOFG. Franciso Gentil Portuguese Institute of Oncology]

We report the results of PBPC collection by large-volume leukaphereses and the hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous PBPC reinfusion in a series of cancer patients treated at the Hematological Intensive Care Unit (UCHI) (Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon). Large volume leukaphereses were used to increase the efficacy of the PBPC collection. This modification of the standard apheresis technique allowed the harvesting, in only one session, of enough progenitors to proceed to transplantation in nearly 2/3 of patients and without significant toxicity. From December 1993 until September 1997, 95 autologous PBSC transplants were performed at the UCHI; 45% were performed in solid tumor patients and 55% in patients with hematologic malignancies. Hematologic recovery was similar to that published in the literature and related to the number of CD34+ cells infused. Patients supported with bone marrow in addition to PBPC showed delayed hematopoietic recovery, probably because the bone marrow harvest was only performed when an insufficient number of PBPC had been collected (2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/Kg). The speed of hematological recovery differed per diagnosis, being higher in multiple myeloma and solid tumor patients and lower in Hodgkin's disease patients.

Large-volume leukaphereses may be more efficient than standard-volume leukaphereses for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells

To overcome the need for multiple leukaphereses to collect enough PBPC for autologous transplantation, large-volume leukaphereses (LVL) are used to process multiple blood volumes per session. We compared the efficiency of CD34+ cell collection by LVL (n = 63; median blood volumes processed 11.1) with that of standard-volume leukaphereses (SVL) (n = 38; median blood volumes processed 1.9). To achieve this in patients with different peripheral blood concentrations of CD34+ cells, we analyzed the ratio of CD34+ cells collected per unit of blood volume processed, divided by the number of CD34+ cells in total blood volume at the beginning of apheresis. For LVL, 30% (9%-323%) of circulating CD34+ cells were collected per blood volume compared with 42% (7%-144%) for SVL (p = 0.02). However, in LVL patients, peripheral blood CD34+ cells/L decreased a median of 54% during LVL (similar data for SVL not available). The number of CD34+ cells collected per blood volume processed after 4 and 8 blood volumes and at the end of LVL were 0.32 (0.01-2.05), 0.24 (0.01-1.68), and 0.22 (0.01-2.40) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p = 0.0007), despite the 54% decrease in peripheral blood CD34+ cells/L throughout LVL. A median 66% decrease in the platelet count was also observed during LVL. Thus, LVL may be more efficient than SVL for PBPC collection, allowing, in most patients, the collection in one LVL of sufficient PBPC to support autologous transplantation.

Similar breast cancer cell contamination of single-day peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections obtained after priming with hematopoietic growth factor alone or after cyclophosphamide followed by growth factor

PURPOSE

To evaluate tumor-cell contamination of peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) collections obtained after priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunocytochemical (ICC) and tumor clonogenic (TCA) assays were used to analyze tumor-cell contamination of pretreatment peripheral-blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples, and of PBPC collection samples obtained after priming with G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg/d for 5 or 7 days in 38 women with advanced breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Results were compared with 37 historical control patients who underwent PBPC mobilization with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) followed by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg/d for 14 days.

RESULTS

Before PBPC priming with G-CSF, only one of 37 (3%) PB and four of 36 (11%) BM samples had tumor cells detected by ICC. Tumor-cell contamination of PBPC collections obtained after 5 or 7 days of G-CSF priming was observed in only three of 38 patients (8%). All patients with tumor cells detected in the PBPC collection had stage IV disease. Cells with in vitro clonogenic potential were detected only in the pretreatment BM sample in one patient, and another two patients had ICC- and TCA-positive PBPC samples despite tumor-negative PB and BM before priming. These results are similar to those previously reported for PBPC primed with cyclophosphamide and GM-CSF.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced breast cancer responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy, tumor-cell contamination is not increased in PBPC collected after 5 or 7 days priming with G-CSF and appears similar to that seen when PBPC are primed with cyclophosphamide followed by GM-CSF.

Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization

PURPOSE

(1) To study the ability of mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected in a single large-volume leukapheresis performed on a predetermined date to accelerate engraftment after high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa; (2) to establish the minimum dose of PBPC associated with early engraftment; and (3) to identify parameters predictive of collection of large numbers of PBPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with breast cancer received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ([GM-CSF] 5 micrograms/kg/d x 15 days) for PBPC mobilization. A single leukapheresis was performed 15 days after cyclophosphamide administration. Then, patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa followed by reinfusion of PBPC and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4HC)-purged bone marrow. PBPC concentration was measured in serial peripheral-blood samples and in the leukapheresis product. Correlation analysis between PBPC dose and engraftment and between leukapheresis yield and patient characteristics was attempted.

RESULTS

A single leukapheresis processed a median 36 L (range, 24 to 46) blood and collected 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (< 0.3 to 24) and 6.2 x 10(5) colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM)/kg (< 0.001 to 29). All sixteen patients (70%) reinfused with > or = 2.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg reached a level of greater than 1,000 leukocytes/microL by day 13 and greater than 50,000 platelets/microL by day 15. All of these patients had a percentage of peripheral-blood CD34+ cells > or = 0.5%, and all but one, a level of greater than 100,000 platelets/microL, on the day of leukapheresis. The bone marrow CD34+ cell percentage at study entry predicted the number of CD34+ cells collected after PBPC mobilization (R2 = .42, P = .002). All patients with > or = 2.5% bone marrow CD34+ cells experienced early engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Reinfusion of PBPC collected in a single leukapheresis accelerates engraftment in the majority of patients. Pretreatment bone marrow CD34+ cell content determines PBPC mobilization capacity and may help select hematopoietic rescue strategies.

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation

The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide has been evaluated in 15 patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with alkylating agents followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation. Each patient received two courses of chemotherapy: 4 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide by 90-min infusion prior to peripheral blood progenitor cell collection (the first course) and 6 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide with 800 mg/m2 of thiotepa by 96-h constant infusion before marrow and stem cell reinjection (the second course). In the first course, plasma cyclophosphamide concentration-time data of 9 of 15 patients were fit by a one-compartment model with Michaelis-Menten saturable elimination in parallel with first-order renal elimination. The mean (SD) Vmax and Km values were 1.47 (0.89) microM/min and 575 (347) microM, respectively. The first course data of the remaining six patients were fit using first-order elimination only. In the second drug course, plasma cyclophosphamide disposition curves of 13 of 15 patients demonstrated a decline in concentration following attainment of an initial steady state. The plasma cyclophosphamide disposition data of these patients were fit by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model, in which the decline of plasma cyclophosphamide concentration after reaching the initial steady state was modeled as being due to an increase in the clearance rate of cyclophosphamide. The mean (SD) initial and final clearance rates were 51 (16) ml/min and 106 (48) ml/min, respectively. Michaelis-Menten elimination was not apparent in the second course because the plasma concentration of cyclophosphamide was much lower. The mean renal clearance rate was 17 ml/min in the first course and 16 ml/min in the second course. Urinary excretion of cyclophosphamide accounted for 17% and 23% of the total dose administered in the first and the second course, respectively. No change in cyclophosphamide clearance rate was apparent in a patient who was taking phenytoin, but a change was present in a patient who was taking phenobarbital. A drug interaction between cyclophosphamide and thiotepa may explain the smaller initial clearance rate for cyclophosphamide during the second drug course.

Absence of breast cancer cells in a single-day peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after priming with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

The effect of priming on occult tumor cell involvement of peripheral blood (PB) and PB progenitor cell (PBPC) collections is poorly characterized. Using sensitive immunocytochemistry (ICC) and tumor clonogenic assays (TCA) specific for epithelial-derived tumor cells, hematopoietic specimens were analyzed for PBPC and occult tumor cell involvement in 28 patients with chemotherapy-sensitive stage IIIB or IV breast cancer. Before PBPC priming, tumor was detected by ICC in PB of 1 of 23 (4%) patients and in bone marrow (BM) harvests of 4 of 27 (15%) patients. Fifteen days after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) priming, 2 of 28 (7%) patients had ICC-positive PBPC collections. The median amplification of CD34+ PBPC during this time was over 19-fold (range, < 1 to 199). One patient had pretreatment tumor involvement of both PB and BM. One patient grew tumor colonies in TCA; the PB and BM were ICC- and TCA-positive, but the PBPC collection was ICC-positive and TCA-negative. After cytoreduction with conventional-dose chemotherapy, patients with advanced breast cancer and histologically negative BM biopsy specimens have rare tumor cell involvement of PB and BM. Despite effective PBPC priming with cyclophosphamide and GM-CSF, clonogenic breast cancer cells were not found in the PBPC collection performed on day 15.

Large-volume leukapheresis using regional citrate anticoagulation to collect peripheral blood progenitor cells

The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for hematopoietic rescue after high-dose chemotherapy is limited by the number of leukaphereses required to collect an adequate number of hematopoietic progenitors. To optimize the collection of PBPC, we evaluated a single large-volume leukapheresis protocol with citrate anticoagulation. A group of 23 patients received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day for 15 days) as PBPC mobilization, with a single outpatient 6 h leukapheresis performed on the COBE Spectra 15 days later. Citrate (0.190 mmol/ml) was infused at 1.2 ml/L of blood/minute with a whole blood to citrate ratio between 17:1 and 25:1. Calcium chloride (50 mM) was administered at a citrate to calcium molar ratio between 10:1 and 5:1 to prevent hypocalcemia. A median 36.6 L (range 24.4-46.4) blood was processed using 338 mM citrate (269-473) and 50 mM calcium (25-75). A median 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (< 0.3-24) and 6.2 x 10(5) CFU-GM/kg (< 0.001-29) were collected, representing 5.6 and 5.9 more PBPC, respectively, than were in circulation at the initiation of leukapheresis. We conclude that a 6 h large-volume leukapheresis following cyclophosphamide and GM-CSF mobilization is safe, can recruit hematopoietic progenitors into the circulatory compartment, and allows the collection of high numbers of PBPC in a single procedure.