1
|
Jia Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu Y, Dai J, Zhang L, Wu X, Zhang J, Xiang H, Yang Y, Zeng Z, Chen Y. Knocking out Selenium Binding Protein 1 Induces Depressive-Like Behavior in Mice. Biol Trace Elem Res 2024; 202:3149-3162. [PMID: 37801218 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-023-03894-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Selenium binding protein 1 (SELENBP1) is involved in neurologic disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and schizophrenia. However, the role of SELENBP1 in the neurogenesis of depression, which is a neurologic disorder, and the underlying mechanisms of oxidative stress and inflammation in depression remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated the changes in the expression levels of SELENBP1 in the hippocampus of a mouse model of depression and in the serum of human patients with depression using the Gene Expression Omnibus database. These changes were validated using blood samples from human patients with depression and mouse models with chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS)-induced depressive-like behavior. We also investigated the effects of SELENBP1 knockout (KO) on inflammation, oxidative stress, and hippocampal neurogenesis in mice with CUMS-induced depression. Our results revealed that SELENBP1 levels was decreased in the blood of human patients with depression and in the hippocampus of mice with CUMS-induced depression. SELENBP1 KO increased CUMS-induced depressive behavior in mice and caused dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. This led to a decrease in the numbers of doublecortin- and Ki67-positive cells, which might aggravate CUMS-induced depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that SELENBP1 might be involved in the regulation of neurogenesis in mice with depression and could be served as a potential target for diagnosing and treating depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Jia
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
| | - Xin Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Yongmei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Jie Dai
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Liangliang Zhang
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou, China
| | - Xian Wu
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, Guizhou, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Laboratory, the Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China
| | - Hongxi Xiang
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Yanping Yang
- Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Zhu Zeng
- Key Laboratory of Infectious Immune and Antibody Engineering of Guizhou Province, Cellular Immunotherapy Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, School of Biology and Engineering/School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province, Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
| | - Yulian Chen
- Mental Health Education and Counseling Center for College Students, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China
- Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Molina Galindo LS, Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Fleischer V, Grotegerd D, Meinert S, Ciolac D, Person M, Stein F, Brosch K, Nenadić I, Alexander N, Kircher T, Hahn T, Winter Y, Othman AE, Bittner S, Zipp F, Dannlowski U, Groppa S. Concurrent inflammation-related brain reorganization in multiple sclerosis and depression. Brain Behav Immun 2024; 119:978-988. [PMID: 38761819 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroinflammation affects brain tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and may have a role in major depressive disorder (MDD). Whether advanced magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the gray-to-white matter border serve as proxy of neuroinflammatory activity in MDD and MS remain unknown. METHODS We included 684 participants (132 MDD patients with recurrent depressive episodes (RDE), 70 MDD patients with a single depressive episode (SDE), 222 MS patients without depressive symptoms (nMS), 58 MS patients with depressive symptoms (dMS), and 202 healthy controls (HC)). 3 T-T1w MRI-derived gray-to-white matter contrast (GWc) was used to reconstruct and characterize connectivity alterations of GWc-covariance networks by means of modularity, clustering coefficient, and degree. A cross-validated support vector machine was used to test the ability of GWc to stratify groups according to their depression symptoms, measured with BDI, at the single-subject level in MS and MDD independently. FINDINGS MS and MDD patients showed increased modularity (ANOVA partial-η2 = 0.3) and clustering (partial-η2 = 0.1) compared to HC. In the subgroups, a linear trend analysis attested a gradient of modularity increases in the form: HC, dMS, nMS, SDE, and RDE (ANOVA partial-η2 = 0.28, p < 0.001) while this trend was less evident for clustering coefficient. Reduced morphological integrity (GWc) was seen in patients with increased depressive symptoms (partial-η2 = 0.42, P < 0.001) and was associated with depression scores across patient groups (r = -0.2, P < 0.001). Depressive symptoms in MS were robustly classified (88 %). CONCLUSIONS Similar structural network alterations in MDD and MS exist, suggesting possible common inflammatory events like demyelination, neuroinflammation that are caught by GWc analyses. These alterations may vary depending on the severity of symptoms and in the case of MS may elucidate the occurrence of comorbid depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Molina Galindo
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Vinzenz Fleischer
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Dominik Grotegerd
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Susanne Meinert
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Dumitru Ciolac
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Maren Person
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederike Stein
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brosch
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nina Alexander
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Tim Hahn
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Yaroslav Winter
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Department of Neuroradiology, Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stefan Bittner
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn(2)), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Linnerbauer M, Lößlein L, Vandrey O, Peter A, Han Y, Tsaktanis T, Wogram E, Needhamsen M, Kular L, Nagel L, Zissler J, Andert M, Meszaros L, Hanspach J, Zuber F, Naumann UJ, Diebold M, Wheeler MA, Beyer T, Nirschl L, Cirac A, Laun FB, Günther C, Winkler J, Bäuerle T, Jagodic M, Hemmer B, Prinz M, Quintana FJ, Rothhammer V. The astrocyte-produced growth factor HB-EGF limits autoimmune CNS pathology. Nat Immunol 2024; 25:432-447. [PMID: 38409259 PMCID: PMC10907300 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-024-01756-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS)-resident cells such as microglia, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes are gaining increasing attention in respect to their contribution to CNS pathologies including multiple sclerosis (MS). Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of pro-inflammatory glial subsets in the pathogenesis and propagation of inflammatory events in MS and its animal models. However, it has only recently become clear that the underlying heterogeneity of astrocytes and microglia can not only drive inflammation, but also lead to its resolution through direct and indirect mechanisms. Failure of these tissue-protective mechanisms may potentiate disease and increase the risk of conversion to progressive stages of MS, for which currently available therapies are limited. Using proteomic analyses of cerebrospinal fluid specimens from patients with MS in combination with experimental studies, we here identify Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) as a central mediator of tissue-protective and anti-inflammatory effects important for the recovery from acute inflammatory lesions in CNS autoimmunity. Hypoxic conditions drive the rapid upregulation of HB-EGF by astrocytes during early CNS inflammation, while pro-inflammatory conditions suppress trophic HB-EGF signaling through epigenetic modifications. Finally, we demonstrate both anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective effects of HB-EGF in a broad variety of cell types in vitro and use intranasal administration of HB-EGF in acute and post-acute stages of autoimmune neuroinflammation to attenuate disease in a preclinical mouse model of MS. Altogether, we identify astrocyte-derived HB-EGF and its epigenetic regulation as a modulator of autoimmune CNS inflammation and potential therapeutic target in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Linnerbauer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lena Lößlein
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Oliver Vandrey
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Peter
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yanan Han
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Molecular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thanos Tsaktanis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Emile Wogram
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Needhamsen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Molecular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lara Kular
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Molecular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lisa Nagel
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Zissler
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marie Andert
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lisa Meszaros
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jannis Hanspach
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Finnja Zuber
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrike J Naumann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin Diebold
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael A Wheeler
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Tobias Beyer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucy Nirschl
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ana Cirac
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik B Laun
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Günther
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Winkler
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maja Jagodic
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Molecular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Prinz
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in NeuroModulation (NeuroModulBasics), Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francisco J Quintana
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Veit Rothhammer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Illes Z, Jørgensen MM, Bæk R, Bente LM, Lauridsen JT, Hyrlov KH, Aboo C, Baumbach J, Kacprowski T, Cotton F, Guttmann CRG, Stensballe A. New Enhancing MRI Lesions Associate with IL-17, Neutrophil Degranulation and Integrin Microparticles: Multi-Omics Combined with Frequent MRI in Multiple Sclerosis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3170. [PMID: 38137391 PMCID: PMC10740934 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood-barrier (BBB) breakdown and active inflammation are hallmarks of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), but the molecular events contributing to the development of new lesions are not well explored. Leaky endothelial junctions are associated with increased production of endothelial-derived extracellular microvesicles (EVs) and result in the entry of circulating immune cells into the brain. MRI with intravenous gadolinium (Gd) can visualize acute blood-barrier disruption as the initial event of the evolution of new lesions. METHODS Here, weekly MRI with Gd was combined with proteomics, multiplex immunoassay, and endothelial stress-optimized EV array to identify early markers related to BBB disruption. Five patients with RMS with no disease-modifying treatment were monitored weekly using high-resolution 3T MRI scanning with intravenous gadolinium (Gd) for 8 weeks. Patients were then divided into three groups (low, medium, or high MRI activity) defined by the number of new, total, and maximally enhancing Gd-enhancing lesions and the number of new FLAIR lesions. Plasma samples taken at each MRI were analyzed for protein biomarkers of inflammation by quantitative proteomics, and cytokines using multiplex immunoassays. EVs were characterized with an optimized endothelial stress EV array based on exosome surface protein markers for the detection of soluble secreted EVs. RESULTS Proteomics analysis of plasma yielded quantitative information on 208 proteins at each patient time point (n = 40). We observed the highest number of unique dysregulated proteins (DEPs) and the highest functional enrichment in the low vs. high MRI activity comparison. Complement activation and complement/coagulation cascade were also strongly overrepresented in the low vs. high MRI activity comparison. Activation of the alternative complement pathway, pathways of blood coagulation, extracellular matrix organization, and the regulation of TLR and IGF transport were unique for the low vs. high MRI activity comparison as well, with these pathways being overrepresented in the patient with high MRI activity. Principal component analysis indicated the individuality of plasma profiles in patients. IL-17 was upregulated at all time points during 8 weeks in patients with high vs. low MRI activity. Hierarchical clustering of soluble markers in the plasma indicated that all four MRI outcomes clustered together with IL-17, IL-12p70, and IL-1β. MRI outcomes also showed clustering with EV markers CD62E/P, MIC A/B, ICAM-1, and CD42A. The combined cluster of these cytokines, EV markers, and MRI outcomes clustered also with IL-12p40 and IL-7. All four MRI outcomes correlated positively with levels of IL-17 (p < 0.001, respectively), and EV-ICAM-1 (p < 0.0003, respectively). IL-1β levels positively correlated with the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions (p < 0.01), new FLAIR lesions (p < 0.001), and total number of Gd-enhancing lesions (p < 0.05). IL-6 levels positively correlated with the number of new FLAIR lesions (p < 0.05). Random Forests and linear mixed models identified IL-17, CCL17/TARC, CCL3/MIP-1α, and TNF-α as composite biomarkers predicting new lesion evolution. CONCLUSIONS Combination of serial frequent MRI with proteome, neuroinflammation markers, and protein array data of EVs enabled assessment of temporal changes in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in RMS related to the evolution of new and enhancing lesions. Particularly, the Th17 pathway and IL-1β clustered and correlated with new lesions and Gd enhancement, indicating their importance in BBB disruption and initiating acute brain inflammation in MS. In addition to the Th17 pathway, abundant protein changes between MRI activity groups suggested the role of EVs and the coagulation system along with innate immune responses including acute phase proteins, complement components, and neutrophil degranulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt Illes
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Brain Research—Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence (BRIDGE), University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Møller Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (M.M.J.); (R.B.)
| | - Rikke Bæk
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (M.M.J.); (R.B.)
| | - Lisa-Marie Bente
- Division Data Science in Biomedicine, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; (L.-M.B.); (T.K.)
- Braunschweig Integrated Centre for Systems Biology (BRICS), TU Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Jørgen T. Lauridsen
- Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Kirsten H. Hyrlov
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Christopher Aboo
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark;
- Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 101408 Beijing, China
| | - Jan Baumbach
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- Institute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Kacprowski
- Division Data Science in Biomedicine, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; (L.-M.B.); (T.K.)
- Braunschweig Integrated Centre for Systems Biology (BRICS), TU Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Francois Cotton
- Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, France/CREATIS, Université de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France;
| | | | - Allan Stensballe
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark;
- Clinical Cancer Center, Aalborg University Hospital, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Shen J, Xu C, Wan C, Yang H, Qiu Y, Xu M, Duo W, Sun T, Cui J, Chu L, Yang X. Proteomic profile of Trichinella spiralis infected mice with acute spinal cord injury: A 4D label-free quantitative analysis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2023; 97:101994. [PMID: 37207504 DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2023.101994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause severe loss of locomotor and sensory activities, with no ideal treatment. Emerging reports suggest that the helminth therapy is highly effective in relieving numerous inflammatory diseases. Proteomic profiling is often used to elucidate the underlying mechanism behind SCI. Herein, we systematically compared the protein expression profiles of murine SCI spinal cord and Trichinella spiralis treated murine SCI spinal cord, using a 4D label-free technique known for its elevated sensitivity. Relative to the SCI mice, the T. spiralis-treated mice exhibited marked alterations in 91 proteins (31 up- and 60 down-regulated). Based on our Gene Ontology (GO) functional analysis, the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were primarily enriched in the processes of metabolism, biological regulation, cellular process, antioxidant activity, and other cell functions. In addition, according to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of protein/EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups (COG/KOG) functional stratification, proteins involved in signaling transduction mechanisms belonged to the largest category. Over-expressed DEPs were also enriched in the "NADPH oxidase complex", "superoxide anion generation", "other types of O-glycan biosynthesis", and "HIF-1 signaling pathway". Furthermore, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network identified the leading 10 hub proteins. In conclusion, we highlighted the dynamic proteomic profiling of T. spiralis-treated SCI mice. Our findings provide significant insight into the molecular mechanism behind T. spiralis regulation of SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Wang
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Junhong Shen
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Changyan Xu
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Chen Wan
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Haoyu Yang
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Yu Qiu
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Mengmeng Xu
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Wenjuan Duo
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Tongjun Sun
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Jie Cui
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Liang Chu
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | - Xiaodi Yang
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elkjaer ML, Simon L, Frisch T, Bente LM, Kacprowski T, Thomassen M, Reynolds R, Baumbach J, Röttger R, Illes Z. Hypothesis of a potential BrainBiota and its relation to CNS autoimmune inflammation. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1043579. [PMID: 36532064 PMCID: PMC9756883 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1043579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Infectious agents have been long considered to play a role in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases as part of the interaction between genetic susceptibility and the environment. The role of bacteria in CNS autoimmunity has also been highlighted by changes in the diversity of gut microbiota in patients with neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer disease and multiple sclerosis, emphasizing the role of the gut-brain axis. We discuss the hypothesis of a brain microbiota, the BrainBiota: bacteria living in symbiosis with brain cells. Existence of various bacteria in the human brain is suggested by morphological evidence, presence of bacterial proteins, metabolites, transcripts and mucosal-associated invariant T cells. Based on our data, we discuss the hypothesis that these bacteria are an integral part of brain development and immune tolerance as well as directly linked to the gut microbiome. We further suggest that changes of the BrainBiota during brain diseases may be the consequence or cause of the chronic inflammation similarly to the gut microbiota.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria L. Elkjaer
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark,BRIDGE, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,*Correspondence: Maria L. Elkjaer, ; Zsolt Illes,
| | - Lukas Simon
- Center for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Tobias Frisch
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lisa-Marie Bente
- Division Data Science in Biomedicine, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany,Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunchweig, Germany
| | - Tim Kacprowski
- Division Data Science in Biomedicine, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany,Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunchweig, Germany
| | - Mads Thomassen
- BRIDGE, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,Research Unit of Human Genetics, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Richard Reynolds
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom,Centre for Molecular Neuropathology, LKC School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jan Baumbach
- Chair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Richard Röttger
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Zsolt Illes
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark,BRIDGE, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark,*Correspondence: Maria L. Elkjaer, ; Zsolt Illes,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, He Q. The role of SELENBP1 and its epigenetic regulation in carcinogenic progression. Front Genet 2022; 13:1027726. [PMID: 36386843 PMCID: PMC9663989 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1027726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The initiation and progression of cancer is modulated through diverse genetic and epigenetic modifications. The epigenetic machinery regulates gene expression through intertwined DNA methylation, histone modifications, and miRNAs without affecting their genome sequences. SELENBP1 belongs to selenium-binding proteins and functions as a tumor suppressor. Its expression is significantly downregulated and correlates with carcinogenic progression and poor survival in various cancers. The role of SELENBP1 in carcinogenesis has not been fully elucidated, and its epigenetic regulation remains poorly understood. In this review, we summarize recent findings on the function and regulatory mechanisms of SELENBP1 during carcinogenic progression, with an emphasis on epigenetic mechanisms. We also discuss the potential cancer treatment targeting epigenetic modification of SELENBP1, either alone or in combination with selenium-containing compounds or dietary selenium.
Collapse
|
8
|
Proteomics in Multiple Sclerosis: The Perspective of the Clinician. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23095162. [PMID: 35563559 PMCID: PMC9100097 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23095162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the inflammatory demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects approximately 2.8 million people worldwide. In the last decade, a new era was heralded in by a new phenotypic classification, a new diagnostic protocol and the first ever therapeutic guideline, making personalized medicine the aim of MS management. However, despite this great evolution, there are still many aspects of the disease that are unknown and need to be further researched. A hallmark of these research are molecular biomarkers that could help in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of the disease. Proteomics, a rapidly evolving discipline of molecular biology may fulfill this dire need for the discovery of molecular biomarkers. In this review, we aimed to give a comprehensive summary on the utility of proteomics in the field of MS research. We reviewed the published results of the method in case of the pathogenesis of the disease and for biomarkers of diagnosis, differential diagnosis, conversion of disease courses, disease activity, progression and immunological therapy. We found proteomics to be a highly effective emerging tool that has been providing important findings in the research of MS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Elkjaer ML, Röttger R, Baumbach J, Illes Z. A Systematic Review of Tissue and Single Cell Transcriptome/Proteome Studies of the Brain in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:761225. [PMID: 35309325 PMCID: PMC8924618 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.761225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating and degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Although inflammatory responses are efficiently treated, therapies for progression are scarce and suboptimal, and biomarkers to predict the disease course are insufficient. Cure or preventive measures for MS require knowledge of core pathological events at the site of the tissue damage. Novelties in systems biology have emerged and paved the way for a more fine-grained understanding of key pathological pathways within the CNS, but they have also raised questions still without answers. Here, we systemically review the power of tissue and single-cell/nucleus CNS omics and discuss major gaps of integration into the clinical practice. Systemic search identified 49 transcriptome and 11 proteome studies of the CNS from 1997 till October 2021. Pioneering molecular discoveries indicate that MS affects the whole brain and all resident cell types. Despite inconsistency of results, studies imply increase in transcripts/proteins of semaphorins, heat shock proteins, myelin proteins, apolipoproteins and HLAs. Different lesions are characterized by distinct astrocytic and microglial polarization, altered oligodendrogenesis, and changes in specific neuronal subtypes. In all white matter lesion types, CXCL12, SCD, CD163 are highly expressed, and STAT6- and TGFβ-signaling are increased. In the grey matter lesions, TNF-signaling seems to drive cell death, and especially CUX2-expressing neurons may be susceptible to neurodegeneration. The vast heterogeneity at both cellular and lesional levels may underlie the clinical heterogeneity of MS, and it may be more complex than the current disease phenotyping in the clinical practice. Systems biology has not solved the mystery of MS, but it has discovered multiple molecules and networks potentially contributing to the pathogenesis. However, these results are mostly descriptive; focused functional studies of the molecular changes may open up for a better interpretation. Guidelines for acceptable quality or awareness of results from low quality data, and standardized computational and biological pipelines may help to overcome limited tissue availability and the “snap shot” problem of omics. These may help in identifying core pathological events and point in directions for focus in clinical prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria L Elkjaer
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Richard Röttger
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Baumbach
- Chair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zsolt Illes
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Proteomics of Multiple Sclerosis: Inherent Issues in Defining the Pathoetiology and Identifying (Early) Biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22147377. [PMID: 34298997 PMCID: PMC8306353 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the human central nervous system having an unconfirmed pathoetiology. Although animal models are used to mimic the pathology and clinical symptoms, no single model successfully replicates the full complexity of MS from its initial clinical identification through disease progression. Most importantly, a lack of preclinical biomarkers is hampering the earliest possible diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the development of rationally targeted therapeutics enabling pre-emptive treatment to halt the disease is also delayed without such biomarkers. Using literature mining and bioinformatic analyses, this review assessed the available proteomic studies of MS patients and animal models to discern (1) whether the models effectively mimic MS; and (2) whether reasonable biomarker candidates have been identified. The implication and necessity of assessing proteoforms and the critical importance of this to identifying rational biomarkers are discussed. Moreover, the challenges of using different proteomic analytical approaches and biological samples are also addressed.
Collapse
|