Somatic inhibition by microscopic magnetic stimulation

Cellular mechanisms underlying carry-over effects after magnetic stimulation

Magnetic fields are widely used for neuromodulation in clinical settings. The intended effect of magnetic stimulation is that neural activity resumes its pre-stimulation state right after stimulation. Many theoretical and experimental works have focused on the cellular and molecular basis of the acute neural response to magnetic field. However, effects of magnetic stimulation can still last after the termination of the magnetic stimulation (named "carry-over effects"), which could generate profound effects to the outcome of the stimulation. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of carry-over effects are largely unknown, which renders the neural modulation practice using magnetic stimulation unpredictable. Here, we investigated carry-over effects at the cellular level, using the combination of micro-magnetic stimulation (µMS), electrophysiology, and computation modeling. We found that high frequency magnetic stimulation could lead to immediate neural inhibition in ganglion neurons from Aplysia californica, as well as persistent, carry-over inhibition after withdrawing the magnetic stimulus. Carry-over effects were found in the neurons that fired action potentials under a variety of conditions. The carry-over effects were also observed in the neurons when the magnetic field was applied across the ganglion sheath. The state of the neuron, specifically synaptic input and membrane potential fluctuation, plays a significant role in generating the carry-over effects after magnetic stimulation. To elucidate the cellular mechanisms of such carry-over effects under magnetic stimulation, we simulated a single neuron under magnetic stimulation with multi-compartment modeling. The model successfully replicated the carry-over effects in the neuron, and revealed that the carry-over effect was due to the dysfunction of the ion channel dynamics that were responsible for the initiation and sustaining of membrane excitability. A virtual voltage-clamp experiment revealed a compromised Na conductance and enhanced K conductance post magnetic stimulation, rendering the neurons incapable of generating action potentials and, therefore, leading to the carry over effects. Finally, both simulation and experimental results demonstrated that the carry-over effects could be controlled by disturbing the membrane potential during the post-stimulus inhibition period. Delineating the cellular and ion channel mechanisms underlying carry-over effects could provide insights to the clinical outcomes in brain stimulation using TMS and other modalities. This research incentivizes the development of novel neural engineering or pharmacological approaches to better control the carry-over effects for optimized clinical outcomes.

Improving focality and consistency in micromagnetic stimulation

The novel micromagnetic stimulation (μMS) technology aims to provide high resolution on neuronal targets. However, consistency of neural activation could be compromised by a lack of surgical accuracy, biological variation, and human errors in operation. We have recently modeled the activation of an unmyelinated axon by a circular micro-coil. Although the coil could activate the axon, its performance sometimes lacked focality and consistency. The site of axonal activation could shift by several experimental factors, including the reversal of the coil current, displacement of the coil, and changes in the intensity of the stimulation. Current clinical practice with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has suggested that figure-eight coils could provide better performance in magnetic stimulation than circular coils. Here, we estimate the performance of μMS by a figure-eight micro-coil, by exploring the impact of the same experimental factors on its focality and consistency in axonal activation. We derived the analytical expression of the electric field and activating function generated by the figure-eight micro-coil, and estimated the location of axonal activation. Using NEURON modeling of an unmyelinated axon, we found two different types (A and B) of axon activation by the figure-eight micro-coil, mediated by coil currents of reversed direction. Type A activation is triggered by membrane hyperpolarization followed by depolarization; Type B activation is triggered by direct membrane depolarization. Consequently, the two types of stimulation are governed by distinct ion channel mechanisms. In comparison to the circular micro-coil, the figure-eight micro-coil requires significantly less current for axonal activation. Under figure-eight micro-coil stimulation, the site of axonal activation does not change with the reversal of the coil current, displacement of the coil, or changes in the intensity of the stimulation. Ultimately, the figure-eight micro-coil provides a more efficient and consistent site of activation than the circular micro-coil in μMS.

Neuron matters: neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation must consider neurons as dynamic identities

Neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation is widely used for the control of abnormal neural activity, and has been proven to be a valuable alternative to pharmacological tools for the treatment of many neurological diseases. Tremendous efforts have been focused on the design of the stimulation apparatus (i.e., electrodes and magnetic coils) that delivers the electric current to the neural tissue, and the optimization of the stimulation parameters. Less attention has been given to the complicated, dynamic properties of the neurons, and their context-dependent impact on the stimulation effects. This review focuses on the neuronal factors that influence the outcomes of electromagnetic stimulation in neuromodulation. Evidence from multiple levels (tissue, cellular, and single ion channel) are reviewed. Properties of the neural elements and their dynamic changes play a significant role in the outcome of electromagnetic stimulation. This angle of understanding yields a comprehensive perspective of neural activity during electrical neuromodulation, and provides insights in the design and development of novel stimulation technology.

Cellular mechanisms underlying state-dependent neural inhibition with magnetic stimulation

Novel stimulation protocols for neuromodulation with magnetic fields are explored in clinical and laboratory settings. Recent evidence suggests that the activation state of the nervous system plays a significant role in the outcome of magnetic stimulation, but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of state-dependency have not been completely investigated. We recently reported that high frequency magnetic stimulation could inhibit neural activity when the neuron was in a low active state. In this paper, we investigate state-dependent neural modulation by applying a magnetic field to single neurons, using the novel micro-coil technology. High frequency magnetic stimulation suppressed single neuron activity in a state-dependent manner. It inhibited neurons in slow-firing states, but spared neurons from fast-firing states, when the same magnetic stimuli were applied. Using a multi-compartment NEURON model, we found that dynamics of voltage-dependent sodium and potassium channels were significantly altered by the magnetic stimulation in the slow-firing neurons, but not in the fast-firing neurons. Variability in neural activity should be monitored and explored to optimize the outcome of magnetic stimulation in basic laboratory research and clinical practice. If selective stimulation can be programmed to match the appropriate neural state, prosthetic implants and brain-machine interfaces can be designed based on these concepts to achieve optimal results.

Finding the Location of Axonal Activation by a Miniature Magnetic Coil

Magnetic stimulation for neural activation is widely used in clinical and lab research. In comparison to electric stimulation using an implanted electrode, stimulation with a large magnetic coil is associated with poor spatial specificity and incapability to stimulate deep brain structures. Recent developments in micromagnetic stimulation (μMS) technology mitigates some of these shortcomings. The sub-millimeter coils can be covered with soft, biocompatible material, and chronically implanted. They can provide highly specific neural stimulation in the deep neural structure. Although the μMS technology is expected to provide a precise location of neural stimulation, the exact site of neural activation is difficult to determine. Furthermore, factors that could cause the shifting of the activation site during μMS have not been fully investigated. To estimate the location of axon activation in μMS, we first derived an analytical expression of the activating function, which predicts the location of membrane depolarization in an unmyelinated axon. Then, we developed a multi-compartment, Hodgkin-Huxley (H-H) type of NEURON model of an unmyelinated axon to test the impact of several important coil parameters on the location of axonal activation. The location of axonal activation was dependent on both the parameters of the stimulus and the biophysics properties of the targeted axon during μMS. The activating function analysis predicted that the location of membrane depolarization and activation could shift due to the reversal of the coil current and the change in the coil-axon distance. The NEURON modeling confirmed these predictions. Interestingly, the NEURON simulation further revealed that the intensity of stimulation played a significant role in the activation location. Moderate or strong coil currents activated the axon at different locations, mediated by two distinct ion channel mechanisms. This study reports several experimental factors that could cause a potential shift in the location of neural activation during μMS, which is essential for further development of this novel technology.

A review on magnetic and spintronic neurostimulation: challenges and prospects

In the treatment of neurodegenerative, sensory and cardiovascular diseases, electrical probes and arrays have shown quite a promising success rate. However, despite the outstanding clinical outcomes, their operation is significantly hindered by non-selective control of electric fields. A promising alternative is micromagnetic stimulation (μMS) due to the high permeability of magnetic field through biological tissues. The induced electric field from the time-varying magnetic field generated by magnetic neurostimulators is used to remotely stimulate neighboring neurons. Due to the spatial asymmetry of the induced electric field, high spatial selectivity of neurostimulation has been realized. Herein, some popular choices of magnetic neurostimulators such as microcoils (μcoils) and spintronic nanodevices are reviewed. The neurostimulator features such as power consumption and resolution (aiming at cellular level) are discussed. In addition, the chronic stability and biocompatibility of these implantable neurostimulator are commented in favor of further translation to clinical settings. Furthermore, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), as another invaluable neurostimulation material, has emerged in recent years. Thus, in this review we have also included MNPs as a remote neurostimulation solution that overcomes physical limitations of invasive implants. Overall, this review provides peers with the recent development of ultra-low power, cellular-level, spatially selective magnetic neurostimulators of dimensions within micro- to nano-range for treating chronic neurological disorders. At the end of this review, some potential applications of next generation neuro-devices have also been discussed.

Planar figure-8 coils for ultra-focal and directional micromagnetic brain stimulation

Recently, white-matter fiber tract pathways carrying neural signals through the brain were shown to follow curved, orthogonal grids. This study focuses on how these white-matter fibers may be selectively excited using micromagnetic stimulation (μMS), a new type of neuronal stimulation, which generates microscopic eddy currents capable of directionally activating neurons. One of the most remarkable properties of this novel type of stimulation is that the μMS fields provide unique directional activation of neuronal elements not seen with traditional electrical stimulation. An initial prototype built with SU-8 based photolithography technology shows that the structure can be fabricated. The coil design was optimized through electrical resistance calculations and electric field simulations to elicit the brain's maximal focal and directional neural responses.