Quantification of tumor microenvironment acidity in glioblastoma using principal component analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MR imaging

The peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: a review of the pretreatment approach

Glioblastomas are the most common and aggressive form of malignant primary brain tumors in adults. The standard treatment is surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite optimal treatment methods, the prognosis for patients remains poor. Preoperative determination of glioblastoma margins remains beneficial for the complete removal of the tumor mass. Radiotherapy is essential for post-surgery treatment, but radioresistance is a significant challenge contributing to high mortality rates. Advanced imaging technologies are used to analyze the changes in the peritumoral brain zone (PTZ). Consequently, they may lead to the development of novel therapeutic options, especially targeting the marginal parts of a tumor, which could improve the prognosis of glioblastoma patients. The clinical presentation of glioblastoma is heterogeneous and mostly depends on the location and size of a tumor. Glioblastomas are characterized by both intratumoral cellular heterogeneity and an extensive, diffuse infiltration into the normal tissue bordering a tumor called the PTZ. Neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) are useful methods in the evaluation of the tumor infiltration and thus the resection margin.

Statistical plots in oncologic imaging, a primer for neuroradiologists

The simplest approach to convey the results of scientific analysis, which can include complex comparisons, is typically through the use of visual items, including figures and plots. These statistical plots play a critical role in scientific studies, making data more accessible, engaging, and informative. A growing number of visual representations have been utilized recently to graphically display the results of oncologic imaging, including radiomic and radiogenomic studies. Here, we review the applications, distinct properties, benefits, and drawbacks of various statistical plots. Furthermore, we provide neuroradiologists with a comprehensive understanding of how to use these plots to effectively communicate analytical results based on imaging data.

Peptide-Hitchhiking for the Development of Nanosystems in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the epitome of aggressiveness and lethality in the spectrum of brain tumors, primarily due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that hinders effective treatment delivery, tumor heterogeneity, and the presence of treatment-resistant stem cells that contribute to tumor recurrence. Nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to overcome these obstacles by attaching targeting ligands to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Among these ligands, peptides stand out due to their ease of synthesis and high selectivity. This article aims to review single and multiligand strategies critically. In addition, it highlights other strategies that integrate the effects of external stimuli, biomimetic approaches, and chemical approaches as nanocatalytic medicine, revealing their significant potential in treating GBM with peptide-functionalized NPs. Alternative routes of parenteral administration, specifically nose-to-brain delivery and local treatment within the resected tumor cavity, are also discussed. Finally, an overview of the significant obstacles and potential strategies to overcome them are discussed to provide a perspective on this promising field of GBM therapy.

Differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphomas and gliomas according to pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose

It is difficult to differentiate between primary central nervous system lymphoma and primary glioblastoma due to their similar MRI findings. This study aimed to assess whether pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI could provide valuable insights for differentiation.

Methods

Seventeen cases of primary central nervous system lymphoma and twenty-one cases of glioblastoma as confirmed by pathology, were retrospectively analyzed. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and the initial area under the Gd concentration curve, were measured from the enhancing tumor parenchyma, peritumoral parenchyma, and contralateral normal parenchyma. Statistical comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney U tests for Ve and Matrix Metallopeptidase-2, while independent samples t-tests were used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters in the mentioned regions and pathological indicators of enhancing tumor parenchyma, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. The pharmacokinetic parameters with statistical differences were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Except for the Wilcoxon rank sum test for Ve, the pharmacokinetic parameters were compared within the enhancing tumor parenchyma, peritumoral parenchyma, and contralateral normal parenchyma of the primary central nervous system lymphomas and glioblastomas using variance analysis and the least-significant difference method.

Results

Statistical differences were observed in Ktrans and Kep within the enhancing tumor parenchyma and in Kep within the peritumoral parenchyma between these two tumor types. Differences were also found in Matrix Metallopeptidase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and microvessel density within the enhancing tumor parenchyma of these tumors. When compared with the contralateral normal parenchyma, pharmacokinetic parameters within the peritumoral parenchyma and enhancing tumor parenchyma exhibited variations in glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, respectively. Moreover, the receiver-operating characteristics analysis showed that the diagnostic efficiency of Kep in the peritumoral parenchyma was notably higher.

Conclusion

Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can differentiate primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma, especially Kep in the peritumoral parenchyma.

Current Status and Future Perspective in Glioma Invasion Research

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults and shows an extremely poor prognosis, with a median survival of 15 months [...].

Peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: biological, clinical and mechanical features

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive and invasive tumor that affects the central nervous system (CNS). With a five-year survival rate of only 6.9% and a median survival time of eight months, it has the lowest survival rate among CNS tumors. Its treatment consists of surgical resection, subsequent fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Despite the implementation of clinical interventions, recurrence is a common occurrence, with over 80% of cases arising at the edge of the resection cavity a few months after treatment. The high recurrence rate and location of glioblastoma indicate the need for a better understanding of the peritumor brain zone (PBZ). In this review, we first describe the main radiological, cellular, molecular and biomechanical tissue features of PBZ; and subsequently, we discuss its current clinical management, potential local therapeutic approaches and future prospects.

Multi-ligand functionalized blood-to-tumor sequential targeting strategies in the field of glioblastoma nanomedicine

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an unmet clinical need characterized by a standard of care (SOC) 5-year survival rate of only 5%, and a treatment mostly palliative. Significant hurdles in GBM therapies include an effective penetration of therapeutics through the brain protective barrier, namely the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and a successful therapeutic delivery to brain-invading tumor cells post-BBB crossing. These hurdles, along with the poor prognosis and critical heterogeneity of the disease, have shifted attention to treatment modalities with capacity to precisely and sequentially target (i) BBB cells, inducing blood-to-brain transport, and (ii) GBM cells, leading to a higher therapeutic accumulation at the tumor site. This sequential targeting allows therapeutic molecules to reach the brain parenchyma and compromise molecular processes that support tumor cell invasion. Besides improving formulation and pharmacokinetics constraints of drugs, nanomedicines offer the possibility of being surface functionalized with multiple possibilities of targeting ligands, while delivering the desired therapeutic cargos to the biological sites of interest. Targeting ligands exploit the site-specific expression or overexpression of specific molecules on BBB and GBM cells, triggering brain plus tumor transport. Since the efficacy of single-ligand functionalized nanomedicines is limited due to the GBM anatomical site (brain) and disease complexity, this review presents an overview of multi-ligand functionalized, BBB and GBM sequentially- and dual-targeted nanomedicines reported in literature over the last 10 years. The role of the BBB in GBM progression, treatment options, and the multiple possibilities of currently available targeting ligands will be summarized. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

The peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: where we are and where we are going

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and invasive primary brain tumor. Current therapies are not curative, and patients' outcomes remain poor with an overall survival of 20.9 months after surgery. The typical growing pattern of GBM develops by infiltrating the surrounding apparent normal brain tissue within which the recurrence is expected to appear in the majority of cases. Thus, in the last decades, an increased interest has developed to investigate the cellular and molecular interactions between GBM and the peritumoral brain zone (PBZ) bordering the tumor tissue. The aim of this review is to provide up-to-date knowledge about the oncogenic properties of the PBZ to highlight possible druggable targets for more effective treatment of GBM by limiting the formation of recurrence, which is almost inevitable in the majority of patients. Starting from the description of the cellular components, passing through the illustration of the molecular profiles, we finally focused on more clinical aspects, represented by imaging and radiological details. The complete picture that emerges from this review could provide new input for future investigations aimed at identifying new effective strategies to eradicate this still incurable tumor.

Differentiation between glioma recurrence and treatment effects using amide proton transfer imaging: A mini-Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis

Background

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging as an emerging MRI approach has been used for distinguishing tumor recurrence (TR) and treatment effects (TEs) in glioma patients, but the initial results from recent studies are different.

Aim

The aim of this study is to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic performance of APT in assessing treatment response in patients with post-treatment gliomas.

Methods

A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was performed to retrieve related original studies. For the single and added value of APT imaging in distinguishing TR from TEs, we calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity by using Bayesian bivariate meta-analyses.

Results

Six studies were included, five of which reported on single APT imaging parameters and four of which reported on multiparametric MRI combined with APT imaging parameters. For single APT imaging parameters, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.74–0.97). For multiparametric MRI including APT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.55–0.97), respectively. In addition, in the three studies reported on both single and added value of APT imaging parameters, the combined imaging parameters further improved diagnostic performance, yielding pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80–0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.79–0.98), respectively, but the pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93) and specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.61–0.94) for single APT imaging parameters.

Conclusion

APT imaging showed high diagnostic performance in assessing treatment response in patients with post-treatment gliomas, and the addition of APT imaging to other advanced MRI techniques can improve the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TR from TE.

Prediction and Visualization of Non-Enhancing Tumor in Glioblastoma via T1w/T2w-Ratio Map

One of the challenges in glioblastoma (GBM) imaging is to visualize non-enhancing tumor (NET) lesions. The ratio of T1- and T2-weighted images (rT1/T2) is reported as a helpful imaging surrogate of microstructures of the brain. This research study investigated the possibility of using rT1/T2 as a surrogate for the T1- and T2-relaxation time of GBM to visualize NET effectively. The data of thirty-four histologically confirmed GBM patients whose T1-, T2- and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI and ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography (Met-PET) were available were collected for analysis. Two of them also underwent MR relaxometry with rT1/T2 reconstructed for all cases. Met-PET was used as ground truth with T2-FLAIR hyperintense lesion, with >1.5 in tumor-to-normal tissue ratio being NET. rT1/T2 values were compared with MR relaxometry and Met-PET. rT1/T2 values significantly correlated with both T1- and T2-relaxation times in a logarithmic manner (p < 0.05 for both cases). The distributions of rT1/T2 from Met-PET high and low T2-FLAIR hyperintense lesions were different and a novel metric named Likeliness of Methionine PET high (LMPH) deriving from rT1/T2 was statistically significant for detecting Met-PET high T2-FLAIR hyperintense lesions (mean AUC = 0.556 ± 0.117; p = 0.01). In conclusion, this research study supported the hypothesis that rT1/T2 could be a promising imaging marker for NET identification.

Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine

Simple Summary

Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.