Relevance of pepsinogen, gastrin, and endoscopic atrophy in the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis

Thyroid disorders and gastrointestinal dysmotility: an old association

Gastrointestinal motility symptoms may be closely related to thyroid diseases. Sometimes, such symptoms are the only thyroid disease-related clue although the degree of the symptoms may vary. The exact mechanism of action of thyroid hormones on gastrointestinal motility is not completely understood, however, a clue lies in the fact that muscle cell receptors can be directly acted upon by thyroxines. Both hypo- and hyperthyroidism can cause impairment of gastrointestinal motility, modifying structure and function of pharynx and esophagus, and regulating esophageal peristalsis through neuro-humoral interaction. In hyperthyroid patients, alterations of postprandial and basic electric rhythms have been observed at gastro-duodenal level, often resulting in slower gastric emptying. Gastric emptying may also be delayed in hypothyroidism, but an unrelated gastric mucosa-affecting chronic modification may also cause such pattern. Hyperthyroidism commonly show malabsorption and diarrhoea, while hypothyroidism frequently show constipation. In summary, it can be stated that symptoms of gastrointestinal motility dysfunction can be related to thyroid diseases, affecting any of the gastrointestinal segment. Clinically, the typical thyroid disease manifestations may be missing, borderline, or concealed because of intercurrent sicknesses. Motility-linked gastrointestinal problems may easily conceal a misdetected, underlying dysthyroidism that should be carefully analyzed. Here, we aim to elaborate on the associations between thyroid disorders and GI dysmotility and the common clinical manifestations associated with GI dysmotility.

RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative-updating the updates

At the end of the last century, a far-sighted 'working party' held in Sydney, Australia addressed the clinicopathological issues related to gastric inflammatory diseases. A few years later, an international conference held in Houston, Texas, USA critically updated the seminal Sydney classification. In line with these initiatives, Kyoto Global Consensus Report, flanked by the Maastricht-Florence conferences, added new clinical evidence to the gastritis clinicopathological puzzle.The most relevant topics related to the gastric inflammatory diseases have been addressed by the Real-world Gastritis Initiative (RE.GA.IN.), from disease definitions to the clinical diagnosis and prognosis. This paper reports the conclusions of the RE.GA.IN. consensus process, which culminated in Venice in November 2022 after more than 8 months of intense global scientific deliberations. A forum of gastritis scholars from five continents participated in the multidisciplinary RE.GA.IN. consensus. After lively debates on the most controversial aspects of the gastritis spectrum, the RE.GA.IN. Faculty amalgamated complementary knowledge to distil patient-centred, evidence-based statements to assist health professionals in their real-world clinical practice. The sections of this report focus on: the epidemiology of gastritis; Helicobacter pylori as dominant aetiology of environmental gastritis and as the most important determinant of the gastric oncogenetic field; the evolving knowledge on gastric autoimmunity; the clinicopathological relevance of gastric microbiota; the new diagnostic horizons of endoscopy; and the clinical priority of histologically reporting gastritis in terms of staging. The ultimate goal of RE.GA.IN. was and remains the promotion of further improvement in the clinical management of patients with gastritis.

Circulating Proteins as Diagnostic Markers in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly malignant disease affecting humans worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Most GC cases are detected at advanced stages due to the cancer lacking early detectable symptoms. Therefore, there is great interest in improving early diagnosis by implementing targeted prevention strategies. Markers are necessary for early detection and to guide clinicians to the best personalized treatment. The current semi-invasive endoscopic methods to detect GC are invasive, costly, and time-consuming. Recent advances in proteomics technologies have enabled the screening of many samples and the detection of novel biomarkers and disease-related signature signaling networks. These biomarkers include circulating proteins from different fluids (e.g., plasma, serum, urine, and saliva) and extracellular vesicles. We review relevant published studies on circulating protein biomarkers in GC and detail their application as potential biomarkers for GC diagnosis. Identifying highly sensitive and highly specific diagnostic markers for GC may improve patient survival rates and contribute to advancing precision/personalized medicine.

Update on Serum Biomarkers in Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is a persistent, corpus-restricted immune-mediated destruction of the gastric corpus oxyntic mucosa with reduced gastric acid and intrinsic factor secretion, leading to iron deficiency and pernicious anemia as a consequence of iron and cobalamin malabsorption. Positivity toward parietal cell (PCA) and intrinsic factor (IFA) autoantibodies is very common. AAG may remain asymptomatic for many years, thus making its diagnosis complex and often delayed. Due to the increased risk of gastric neoplasms, a timely diagnosis of AAG is clinically important.

CONTENT

The gold standard for AAG diagnosis is histopathological assessment of gastric biopsies obtained during gastroscopy, but noninvasive, preendoscopic serological screening may be useful in some clinical scenarios. Serum biomarkers for AAG may be divided into 2 groups: gastric autoimmunity-related biomarkers, such as PCA and IFA, and gastric corpus atrophy/reduced gastric acid secretion-related biomarkers, such as serum gastrin and pepsinogens. The present review focuses on the clinical significance and pitfalls of serum biomarkers related to gastric autoimmunity and gastric corpus atrophy, including some discussion of analytical methods.

SUMMARY

Serum assays for PCA, IFA, gastrin, and pepsinogen I show good diagnostic accuracy for noninvasive diagnostic work-up of AAG. Diagnostic performance may increase by combining >1 of these tests, overcoming the problem of seronegative AAG. However, appropriately designed, comparative studies with well-characterized patient cohorts are needed to better define the reliability of these biomarkers in the diagnosis of patients with AAG. Currently, positive serum tests should always be followed by the state-of-art diagnostic test, that is, histopathological assessment of gastric biopsies obtained during gastroscopy to definitively confirm or rule out AAG and eventually neoplastic complications.

Serum pepsinogens can help to discriminate between H. pylori-induced and auto-immune atrophic gastritis: Results from a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Serum pepsinogen (PG) testing is recommended by the European guidelines for diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG). However, wide variations in diagnostic performances are observed, due to the differences in the extent of gastric atrophy, and possibly in its origin (Helicobacter pylori-, autoimmune (AIG)).

AIM

To analyze the diagnostic performances of PGs testing according to these different parameters, using enzyme-linked-immunosorbent serologic assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLEIA).

METHODS

Serum samples from patients having undergone gastroscopy with biopsies in five French centers were collected prospectively. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and Area Under Curve were analyzed according to the extent and origin of CAG.

RESULTS

Overall, 344 patients (156 males [45%]; mean age 58.8 [±14.2] years) were included, among whom 44 had AIG. Diagnostic performances of PG I for the detection of corpus CAG were excellent, with Se and Sp of 92.7% and 99.1% for ELISA and 90.5% and 98.2% for CLEIA, respectively. For AIG, corresponding values were 97.7% and 97.4% for ELISA, and 95.6% and 97.1% for CLEIA. In multivariate analysis, PG levels were associated with the auto-immune origin (p<0.001) but not with the extent of the atrophic gastritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pepsinogens are highly efficient for the diagnosis of corpus-limited CAG and allow to discriminate AIG from H. pylori-induced gastritis.

Increased Prevalence of Autoimmune Gastritis in Patients with a Gastric Precancerous Lesion

Background: Autoimmune gastritis (AIG), characterized with the presence of anti-parietal-cell antibodies (APCA), is a risk factor for gastric cancer. However, AIG may go underdiagnosed, especially in the case of H. pylori infection and the presence of gastric precancerous lesions (GPL), due to the ambiguous pathology and delayed symptom onset. Aim: Investigate the prevalence and characteristics of AIG in GPL patients. Methods: Prevalence of AIG was determined with the presence of APCA in patients with GPL (n = 256) and the control group (n = 70). Pathological characteristics and levels of gastrin 17 (G17), pepsinogen (PG) I and II and anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG were assessed in GPL cases, and the severity of intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy was scored by expert pathologists. Results: APCA positivity was observed in 18% of cases vs. 7% of controls (p = 0.033). Only 3/256 patients were previously diagnosed with AIG. The presence of APCA was associated with corpus-limited and extended GPL. A receiver operating curve analysis demonstrated that the G17 and PGI/II ratio could identify APCA-positive patients within GPL cases (AUC: 0.884). Conclusions: The prevalence of AIG is higher in patients with GPL but goes undiagnosed. Using G17 and PG I/II as diagnostic markers can help to identify patients with AIG and improve surveillance programs for patients with GPL.

A Comprehensive Review of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Management in Autoimmune Gastritis: Current Insights and Future Directions

Autoimmune gastritis is characterized by inflammation of the gastric mucosa due to autoimmune dysregulation. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms associated with autoimmune gastritis can significantly impact an individual's quality of life and require effective management strategies. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of upper gastrointestinal symptom management in autoimmune gastritis, aiming to consolidate existing knowledge, identify gaps, and offer insights for future research and clinical practice. The review begins by discussing the background and significance of autoimmune gastritis, highlighting its prevalence and the impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms on affected individuals. The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of autoimmune gastritis-related upper gastrointestinal symptoms are explored, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis and targeted management approaches. Diagnostic approaches, including diagnostic criteria, endoscopy, histology, and biomarkers, are critically examined, along with the challenges and limitations associated with diagnosing autoimmune gastritis. The review then delves into the pharmacological approaches for symptom relief, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 receptor antagonists. It explores the role of dietary modifications and lifestyle changes in symptom control. The article further discusses recent advancements in pharmacological interventions, novel therapeutic approaches, and the potential benefits of complementary and alternative medicine in symptom management. The concept of patient-centered approaches and personalized management strategies is emphasized, highlighting the importance of considering individual patient characteristics, treatment goals, and preferences. Recommendations for future research and clinical management are provided, including exploring emerging therapeutic targets, precision medicine approaches, and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and patient advocacy groups. The review concludes by emphasizing the significance of implementing the findings and recommendations in clinical practice to enhance patient care and improve the quality of life for individuals with autoimmune gastritis.

Clinicopathological characteristics of autoimmune gastritis: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a prominent risk factor for pernicious anemia (PA) and gastric neoplasia. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of AIG patients in China, with a focus on those who had positive anti-intrinsic factor antibodies (AIFA).

METHODS

A total of 103 AIG patients who were diagnosed between January 2018 and August 2022 were reviewed in a large academic tertiary teaching hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of AIFA, and their serologic and histopathological characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 103 AIG patients was 54.16±11.92 years (range 23-79), with 69 (66.99%) being women. AIFA were present in 28.16% of patients. Patients with AIFA-positive had a higher risk of PA than those with AIFA-negative, as demonstrated by a larger mean corpuscular volume (MCV), lower hemoglobin level, and lower vitamin B-12 level (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in gastric histopathology, gastrin level, and pepsinogen level when patients were divided into AIFA-positive and AIFA-negative group. Of the 103 cases, 34 (33.01%) were concomitant with other autoimmune diseases, with autoimmune thyroid diseases being the most common (25.24%, 26/103). Thyroid peroxidase antibody, which accounted for 45.45% (25/55), was the most prevalent thyroid antibody, followed by anti-thyroglobulin antibody (34.55%, 19/55), thyroid stimulating antibody (12.73%, 7/55), and thyrotropin receptor antibody (3.64%, 2/55).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the increased risk of severe anemia in AIFA-positive AIG patients, particularly for PA. Clinicians should consider the presence of AIFA as a warning sign for PA and prioritize early diagnosis and appropriate treatment to prevent serious complications.

Clinical value of serum pepsinogen in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric diseases

Pepsinogen, secreted from the gastric mucosa, is the precursor of pepsin. It is categorized as pepsinogen 1 and pepsinogen 2 based on its immunogenicity. The pepsinogen content that can enter the blood circulation through the capillaries of the gastric mucosa is approximately 1% and remains stable all the time. The pepsinogen content in serum will change with the pathological changes of gastric mucosa. Therefore, the level of pepsinogen in serum can play a role in serologic biopsy to reflect the function and morphology of different regions of gastric mucosa and serve as an indicator of gastric disease. This study conducts relevant research on serum pepsinogen 1, pepsinogen 2, and the ratio of pepsinogen 1 to pepsinogen 2, and reviews their important value in clinical diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric ulcer, and even gastric carcinoma, providing ideas for other researchers.

Update in Molecular Aspects and Diagnosis of Autoimmune Gastritis

Recent studies have advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of autoimmune gastritis, particularly its molecular aspects. The most noteworthy recent advancement lies in the identification of several candidate genes implicated in the pathogenesis of pernicious anemia through genome-wide association studies. These genes include PTPN22, PNPT1, HLA-DQB1, and IL2RA. Recent studies have also directed attention towards other genes such as ATP4A, ATP4B, AIRE, SLC26A7, SLC26A9, and BACH2 polymorphism. In-depth investigations have been conducted on lymphocytes and cytokines, including T helper 17 cells, interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17E, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-19, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-15, transforming growth factor-β1, IL-13, and diminished levels of IL-27. Animal studies have explored the involvement of roseolovirus and H. pylori in relation to the onset of the disease and the process of carcinogenesis, respectively. Recent studies have comprehensively examined the involvement of autoantibodies, serum pepsinogen, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis. The current focus lies on individuals demonstrating atypical presentations of the disease, including those diagnosed in childhood, those yielding negative results for autoantibodies, and those lacking the typical endoscopic characteristics of mucosal atrophy. Here, we discuss the recent developments in this field, focusing on genetic predisposition, epigenetic modifications, lymphocytes, cytokines, oxidative stress, infectious agents, proteins, microRNAs, autoantibodies, serum pepsinogen, gastrin, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and microscopic findings, and the risk of gastric neoplasm.

Autoimmune gastritis: long-term natural history in naïve Helicobacter pylori-negative patients

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is an immunomediated disease targeting parietal cells, eventually resulting in oxyntic-restricted atrophy. This long-term follow-up study aimed at elucidating the natural history, histological phenotype(s), and associated cancer risk of patients with AIG consistently tested H. pylori-negative (naïve H. pylori-negative subjects).

DESIGN

Two-hundred eleven naïve H. pylori-negative patients (tested by serology, histology, molecular biology) with AIG (F:M=3.15:1; p<0.001) were prospectively followed up with paired biopsies (T1 vs T2; mean follow-up years:7.5 (SD:4.4); median:7). Histology distinguished non-atrophic versus atrophic AIG. Atrophy was further subtyped/scored as non-metaplastic versus metaplastic (pseudopyloric (PPM) and intestinal (IM)). Enterochromaffin-like-cell (ECL) status was categorised as diffuse versus adenomatoid hyperplasia/dysplasia, and type 1 neuroendocrine tumours (Type1-NETs).

RESULTS

Over the long-term histological follow-up, AIG consistently featured oxyntic-predominant-mononuclear inflammation. At T1, PPM-score was greater than IM (200/211 vs 160/211, respectively); IM scores increased from T1 to T2 (160/211 to 179/211), with no changes in the PPM prevalence (T1=200/211; T2=201/211). At both T1/T2, the prevalence of OLGA-III-stage was <5%; no Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)-IV-stage occurred. ECL-cell-status progressed from diffuse to adenomatoid hyperplasia/dysplasia (T1=167/14 vs T2=151/25). Type1-NETs (T1=10; T2=11) always coexisted with extensive oxyntic-atrophy, and ECL adenomatoid-hyperplasia/dysplasia. No excess risk of gastric or other malignancies was found over a cumulative follow-up time of 10 541 person years, except for (marginally significant) thyroid cancer (SIR=3.09; 95% CI 1.001 to 7.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxyntic-restricted inflammation, PPM (more than IM), and ECL-cell hyperplasia/neoplasia are the histological AIG hallmarks. Compared with the general population, corpus-restricted inflammation/atrophy does not increase the GC risk. The excess of GC risk reported in patients with AIG could plausibly result from unrecognised previous/current H. pylori comorbidity.

Kyoto classification of gastritis: Advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis

This editorial provides an update of the recent evidence on the endoscopy-based Kyoto classification of gastritis, clarifying the shortcomings of the Kyoto classification, and providing prospects for future research, with particular focus on the histological subtypes of gastric cancer (GC) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection status. The total Kyoto score is designed to express GC risk on a score ranging from 0 to 8, based on the following five endoscopic findings: Atrophy, intestinal metaplasia (IM), enlarged folds (EF), nodularity, and diffuse redness (DR). The total Kyoto score reflects H. pylori status as follows: 0, ≥ 2, and ≥ 4 indicate a normal stomach, H. pylori-infected gastritis, and gastritis at risk for GC, respectively. Regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) predicts non-infection; EF, nodularity, and DR predict current infection; map-like redness (MLR) predicts past infection; and atrophy and IM predict current or past infection. Atrophy, IM, and EF all increase the incidence of H. pylori-infected GC. MLR is a specific risk factor for H. pylori-eradicated GC, while RAC results in less GC. Diffuse-type GC can be induced by active inflammation, which presents as EF, nodularity, and atrophy on endoscopy, as well as neutrophil and mononuclear cell infiltration on histology. In contrast, intestinal-type GC develops via atrophy and IM, and is consistent between endoscopy and histology. However, this GC risk-scoring design needs to be improved.