Survival comparison between postoperative and preoperative radiotherapy for stage I-III non-inflammatory breast cancer

Advances in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for breast cancer

Breast conserving treatment typically involves surgical excision of tumor and adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the breast area or tumor bed. Accurately defining the tumor bed is challenging and lead to irradiation of greater volume of healthy tissues. Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) which target tumor may solves that issues. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluates the early toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of this promising treatment approach. Secondary we reviewed pathological complete response (pCR) rates, late toxicity, patient selection criteria and radiotherapy protocols. We retrieved literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten prospective clinical trials (7 phase II, 3 phase I), encompassing 188 patients (aged 18-75 years, cT1-T3 cN0-N3 cM0, primarily with ER/PgR-positive, HER2-negative status,), were analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-30). Treatment involved single-fraction SBRT (15-21Gy) in five studies and fractionated (19.5-31.5Gy in 3 fractions) in the rest. Time interval from SBRT to surgery was 9.5 weeks (range 1-28). Acute and late G2 toxicity occurred in 0-17% and 0-19% of patients, respectively, G3 toxicity was rarely observed. The cosmetic outcome was excellent in 85-100%, fair in 0-10% and poor in only 1 patient. pCR varied, showing higher rates (up to 42%) with longer intervals between SBRT and surgery and when combined with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (up to 90%). Preoperative SBRT significantly reduce overall treatment time, enabling to minimalize volumes. Early results indicate excellent cosmetic effects and low toxicity.

Clinical Tools for Optimizing Therapeutic Decision-Making in Prostate Cancer: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis

The effective staging of prostate cancer is essential for optimizing treatment and predicting outcomes. This study assessed the correlation between detailed preoperative diagnostic scores and postoperative outcomes to evaluate the accuracy of cancer restaging and its impact on treatment decisions and prognosis after prostatectomy. This retrospective study analyzed 133 prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomies at "Pius Brinzeu" Clinical Emergency Hospital in Timisoara over five years. Preoperative Gleason scores increased significantly across risk categories, from an average of 6.21 in low-risk patients to 7.57 in high-risk patients. This trend continued postoperatively, with scores rising from 7.04 to 8.33, respectively. The average increase in Gleason scores from preoperative to postoperative assessments was most pronounced in high-risk patients, at 0.76. Significant changes in clinical staging included increases in NCCN risk, where high-risk patients showed a 30% increase, and ISUP grade, with a 26.7% increase in the high-risk category. Notably, nodal status changes were also significant in high-risk patients, showing a 23.3% increase. The incidence of MRI-detected adenopathy was notably higher in the high-risk group (50%). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between the preoperative CAPRA score and postoperative ISUP grade (r = 0.261) and the preoperative PIRADS score and postoperative ISUP grade (r = 0.306). Similar observations were made between the preoperative and postoperative Gleason scores (r = 0.286) and the number of positive fragments (r = 0.227) with the postoperative ISUP grading. Furthermore, the preoperative CAPRA score was significantly correlated (r = 0.261) with the postoperative ISUP grading. Preoperative MRI findings, which included assessments of adenopathy and seminal vesicle invasion, were also significantly correlated (r = 0.218) with the postoperative pathological findings. Additionally, a significant correlation was found between the preoperative PIRADS score and postoperative ISUP grade (r = 0.306). In forecasting the aggressiveness and staging of prostate cancer following surgery, preoperative PSA levels showed an AUC of 0.631; the preoperative Gleason score had an AUC adjusted to 0.582, and the number of positive biopsy fragments indicated an AUC of 0.566. These results highlight the necessity of accurate and comprehensive preoperative assessments to better predict disease progression and refine treatment strategies.

Implantable, 3D-Printed Alginate Scaffolds with Bismuth Sulfide Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Local Breast Cancer via Enhanced Radiotherapy

Surgical removal of tumor tissue remains the primary clinical approach for addressing breast cancer; however, complete tumor excision is challenging, and the remaining tumor cells can lead to tumor recurrence and metastasis over time, which substantially deteriorates the life quality of the patients. With the aim to improve local cancer radiotherapy, this work reports the fabrication of alginate (Alg) scaffolds containing bovine serum albumin (BSA)-coated bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3@BSA) nanoradiosensitizers using three-dimensional (3D) printing. Under single-dose X-ray irradiation in vitro, Alg-Bi2S3@BSA scaffolds significantly increase the formation of reactive oxygen species, enhance the inhibition of breast cancer cells, and suppress their colony formation capacity. In addition, scaffolds implanted under tumor tissue in murine model show high therapeutic efficacy by reducing the tumor volume growth rate under single-dose X-ray irradiation, while histological observation of main organs reveals no cytotoxicity or side effects. 3D-printed Alg-Bi2S3@BSA scaffolds produced with biocompatible and biodegradable materials may potentially lower the recurrence and metastasis rates in breast cancer patients by inhibiting residual tumor cells following postsurgery as well as exhibit anticancer properties in other solid tumors.

Technical consideration for breast reconstruction in patients requiring neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Surgical considerations for breast reconstruction (BR) in patients requiring neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) or adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) cannot be understated. The management of irradiated tissue leads surgeons to face several challenges. Therefore, it is essential to comprehensively understand the proper patient selection and preoperative planning to ensure the best outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. This narrative review aims to provide an update and summary of the most important technical considerations every breast surgeon must contemplate reconstructing the irradiated breast.

Methods

The search strategy was performed on January 10th, 2023. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were queried to capture all publications regarding surgical considerations in BR of patients undergoing NART and ART.

Key Content and Findings

This review shows that the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on BR are still being studied. RT represents an essential factor for overall patient survival, and its use is increasing. However, the range of RT treatments across different cancer centers complicates the creation of a single treatment protocol. BR improves women's quality of life, so finding the proper integration of BR and RT is essential. When deciding on the reconstructive method, there are several factors to consider, such as the patient's body characteristics, tumor stage, RT protocol, and chemotherapy. To achieve the best surgical results and the most satisfied patient, using less aggressive and safer RT methods in the treatment sequence is recommended.

Conclusions

The timing of the radiation will influence the selection of the best reconstructive methods to be employed in the breast cancer patient. However, there is clear evidence of preference for immediate autologous-based BR in cases due to the low rate of complications in the long term. But patient individualization is the key. Therefore, the benefits and risks of immediate versus delayed and autologous versus implant-based reconstruction must be weighed in every single case.

A narrative review for radiation oncologists to implement preoperative partial breast irradiation

The strategy to anticipate radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, for breast cancer (BC) treatment, has recently generated a renewed interest. Historically, preoperative RT has remained confined either to highly selected patients, in the context of personalized therapy, or to clinical research protocols. Nevertheless, in the recent years, thanks to technological advances and increased tumor biology understanding, RT has undergone great changes that have also impacted the preoperative settings, embracing the modern approach to breast cancer. In particular, the reappraisal of preoperative RT can be viewed within the broader view of personalized and tailored medicine. In fact, preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) allows a more precise target delineation, with less variability in contouring among radiation oncologists, and a smaller treatment volume, possibly leading to lower toxicity and to dose escalation programs. The aim of the present review, which represents a benchmark study for the AIRC IG-23118, is to report available data on different technical aspects of preoperative RT including dosimetric studies, patient's selection and set-up, constraints, target delineation and clinical results. These data, along with the ones that will become available from ongoing studies, may inform the design of the future trials and representing a step toward a tailored APBI approach with the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm in early-stage BC.Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454).

Preoperative Radiotherapy Does Not Change the Existing Treatment Paradigm in Stage III Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) plays an indispensable role in postoperative breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of preoperative RT for stage III breast cancer by comparing preoperative RT with postoperative RT in terms of overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Based on the information in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2018, patients with stage III breast cancer who had undergone radical surgery and RT were divided into two groups: a preoperative RT group and a postoperative RT group. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate independent factors associated with OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance stratification factors.

RESULTS

In total, 9,605 patients were enrolled, of whom 9,456 received postoperative RT and 149 received preoperative RT. After a median follow-up of 72 months, postoperative RT was found to be superior to preoperative RT in terms of OS (p < 0.000). Compared to the postoperative RT group, the preoperative RT group showed a significantly higher risk of overall mortality without PSM in univariate (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.653, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.288-2.123, p < 0.000) and multivariate analyses (OS: HR = 1.409, 95% CI: 1.096-1.810, p = 0.007). After PSM, the OS of the postoperative RT group was superior to the OS in the preoperative RT group (p = 0.041). Compared with the postoperative RT group, the preoperative RT group showed a significantly higher risk of overall mortality without PSM in univariate (HR = 1.312, 95% CI: 1.010-1.704, p = 0.042) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.466, 95% CI: 1.127-1.906, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative RT does not improve OS in patients with stage III breast cancer and has a worse prognosis. Preoperative RT has not changed the existing treatment paradigm in the current therapeutic context for patients with stage III breast cancer.

Anti-Tumor Immunity and Preoperative Radiovaccination: Emerging New Concepts in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for certain breast cancer (BC) subtypes confers significant tumor regression rates and a survival benefit for patients with a complete pathologic response. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated that immune-related factors are responsible for better treatment outcomes, and thus, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has emerged as a means to further improve patient survival rates. Innate immunological "coldness", however, of specific BC subtypes, especially of the luminal ones, due to their immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, hinders the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Treatment policies aiming to reverse this immunological inertia are, therefore, needed. Moreover, radiotherapy (RT) has been proven to have a significant interplay with the immune system and promote anti-tumor immunity. This "radiovaccination" effect could be exploited in the neoadjuvant setting of BC and significantly enhance the effects of the already established clinical practice. Modern stereotactic irradiation techniques directed to the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes may prove important for the RT-NACT-IO combination. In this review, we provide an overview and critically discuss the biological rationale, clinical experience, and ongoing research underlying the interplay between neoadjuvant chemotherapy, anti-tumor immune response, and the emerging role of RT as a preoperative adjunct with immunological therapeutic implications in BC.