1
|
Harris R, Lowers V, Hulme C, Burnside G, Best A, Clarkson JE, Cooke R, Van Der Zande M, Maitland R. Behavioural intervention to promote the uptake of planned care in urgent dental care attenders: study protocol for the RETURN randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:475. [PMID: 35672830 PMCID: PMC9172193 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06418-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to visit the dentist for planned care, even though they have disproportionately poorer oral health. They are correspondingly more likely to experience dental problems and use urgent dental care, general practices and Accident and Emergency departments, which not only makes meeting their needs expensive, but, since these services often rely on prescriptions rather than addressing the clinical cause, can contribute to antimicrobial resistance. METHODS The RETURN intervention has been developed with substantial community co-production, to be delivered opportunistically in urgent dental care settings. This brief intervention is delivered by dental nurses and involves material relevant to the 'in-group' targeted. The material includes booklets relating to barriers to planned dental visiting with corresponding short video clips featuring local people and including a modelling element. Dental nurses are trained to have supportive and non-judgemental conversations, assisting patients to set personal goals and action plans, which are reinforced in a follow-up text within a few weeks. A randomised controlled trial will be undertaken in 3 types of sites: dental practices delivering urgent care (a) within working hours, (b) out of hours, and (c) in a Dental Hospital. The trial will recruit 1180 adult urgent dental care users over 12 months, who have not visited a dentist for a planned care appointment for 2 years or more and do not have a dentist who they visit for routine care. It aims to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention and to explore whether the intervention has different effects across the socio-economic gradient. Participants will be followed up at 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation. Co-primary outcomes are attendance at a dental practice for planned care within 12 months and self-reported oral health-related quality of life at 12 months. DISCUSSION This is a pragmatic trial, evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention under the usual condition in which it might be applied. Since dental practices work as independent contractors to the NHS, this brings implementation and fidelity challenges which will be explored and described in embedded qualitative work. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry identifier ISRCTN84666712. Registered 12/04/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Harris
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
| | - V Lowers
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - C Hulme
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - G Burnside
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Best
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Clinical Directorate, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J E Clarkson
- Division of Oral Health Sciences, Dental Hospital & School, Park Place, Dundee, UK
| | - R Cooke
- School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DE, UK
| | - M Van Der Zande
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Maitland
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Clinical Directorate, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olley RC, Frost Bem PM. Clinical and academic recommendations for primary dental care prosthodontics. Br Dent J 2019; 227:451-455. [PMID: 31562439 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-019-0785-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Prosthodontic practice includes a large proportion of dental care provision, mostly undertaken in primary dental care (PDC) in the UK. However, there is limited research evidence in prosthodontic practice, necessary to tackle key questions to improve oral and dental health. In addition, many overarching challenges exist within the NHS system relevant to prosthodontics. For example, demands on healthcare services from increasing patient expectations, the ever-ageing and growing population, risks of litigation, availability of appropriate care, difficulties with access to care, rapidly emerging treatments and technologies, and ongoing needs for education. This article develops clinical and academic recommendations to improve oral health improvements in PDC prosthodontics, further to recommendations determined by the James Lind Alliance, a non-profit making initiative to tackle treatment 'uncertainties' (http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/), and the overarching challenges, which are mentioned above. Considerable clinical and academic author experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary care as well as education and research in prosthodontics are employed. We consider management of networks involving patients, carers, healthcare professionals, industry and academics, in order to increase access to improve oral and general health and help drive dental research, education and communication. We investigate how to manage dental disease and intervene to improve the longevity of restorations and the dentition. Finally, we review how rapidly developing digital technologies can best be utilised, in conjunction with industry, in order to improve oral health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Olley
- Clinical Specialist and Academic in Prosthodontics, West Mersea Dental Practice, Colchester, CO5 8RA, UK; King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, UK.
| | - Peter M Frost Bem
- Clinical Specialist and Senior Clinical Teacher, 178 Peckham Rye Lane, London, SE22 9QA, UK; King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Macey R, Tickle M, MacKay L, McGrady M, Pretty IA. A comparison of dental fluorosis in adult populations with and without lifetime exposure to water fluoridation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018; 46:608-614. [PMID: 30178518 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a lack of evidence on the proportion and severity of fluorosis in adult populations exposed and not exposed to fluoridated water over their lifetimes. The aim of this study was to compare the proportion and severity of fluorosis in adults with lifetime exposure to water fluoridation with a nonexposed sample. A secondary aim was to report the gradient of fluorosis severity by age. METHODS A cross-sectional study recruited a sample with lifetime exposure to water fluoridation and a matched, nonexposed group. 580 participants, aged 18-52 years (mean 34.3, SD 9.4) and 64% female, were recruited in general dental practices located in fluoridated (Birmingham and County Durham) and nonfluoridated areas (Manchester). Three digital images were taken of their incisors and an experienced examiner who was blind to exposure status viewed the images remotely and allocated fluorosis scores using the Thylstrup and Fejerskov (TF) scale. RESULTS At TF ≥ 1 (any fluorosis), a significantly higher proportion of participants from the fluoridated area had fluorosis (F 39% NF 21.3%, P < 0.001), at the threshold TF ≥ 3 ("aesthetic concern"), the difference was no longer statistically significant (F 4.1%, NF 2.2%, P = 0.25). There was a gradient by age, whereby fluorosis was highest in the youngest and lowest in the oldest age group. CONCLUSIONS Although fluorosis is more common in adults with lifetime exposure to water fluoridation than those with no exposure, the aesthetic impact of fluorosis seems to diminish with age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Macey
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Tickle
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura MacKay
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael McGrady
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain A Pretty
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Estai M, Winters J, Kanagasingam Y, Shiikha J, Checker H, Kruger E, Tennant M. Validity and reliability of remote dental screening by different oral health professionals using a store-and-forward telehealth model. Br Dent J 2018; 221:411-414. [PMID: 27713449 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of intraoral photographic assessments by different members of a dental team as a means for dental screening in children.Methods The intraoral photographic records of 126 children (2 to 18 years old) were obtained from routine clinical records taken before dental treatment. Intraoral photographs were obtained using a DSLR camera and then uploaded to a cloud-based server using store-and-forward telehealth technology. Images were reviewed by an expert panel to formulate a benchmark screening baseline, to which the screeners' data were compared. The photographic assessments conducted by a mid-level dental practitioner (MLDP) and dentist, were compared to the benchmark expert panel assessment.Results The screeners' assessments by means of intraoral photography, when compared to the expert panel assessment had a sensitivity value of 82-89% and specificity value of 97%. The inter-examiner agreement between the expert panel assessment and photographic method (assessed by a dentist and MLDP), was almost perfect, with a kappa score ranging from 0.82 to 0.88. The mean DFT/dft score for the children as determined by the expert panel's review and photographic assessment ranging from 5.41 to 5.79, with mean scores between the two assessment methods not significantly different (P = 0.746).Conclusion Our results suggested that oral health professionals (other than dentists) have the potential to screen for caries from intraoral photographs with the same diagnostic accuracy and reliability as dentists. This strategy has implications for supporting the use of MLDPs such as dental therapists or hygienists to screen for oral disease using telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Estai
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - J Winters
- Dental Department, Princess Margaret Hospital, Australia
| | | | - J Shiikha
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - H Checker
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - E Kruger
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - M Tennant
- International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feasibility study: assessing the efficacy and social acceptability of using dental hygienist-therapists as front-line clinicians. Br Dent J 2018; 221:717-721. [PMID: 27932822 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background The oral health of the adult population has been improving in the United Kingdom decade upon decade. Over half of dental service activity in the National Health Service (NHS) is limited to a check-up without any further treatment. This raises a question as to whether check-ups could be provided by dental hygienist-therapists, rather than general dental practitioners. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial to evaluate the costs and effects of using dental hygienist-therapists to undertake the check-up.Methods/design Adult NHS patients were randomised into three arms in two dental practices: patients who only saw dental hygienist-therapists for a check-up, those that saw the general dental practitioner and dental hygienist-therapist alternatively and a control, where patients only saw the general dental practitioner for their check-up. The study ran for 15 months. The primary outcome measures of the study were patient recruitment, retention and fidelity. A parallel and embedded qualitative study was undertaken which recorded the views of participating patients to determine the social acceptability of the intervention.Results Sixty patients participated in the study. The initial recruitment rate for the study was 33.7%. This figure increased to over 82.1% when telephone calls or face-to-face recruitment was utilised. The retention rates were 60% for both the dental hygienist-therapist only group and the alternate general dental practitioner and dental hygienist-therapist group, compared to 70% for the general dental practitioner only group. Fifteen patients were interviewed in the qualitative study and supported a team approach to the provision of check-ups in the NHS. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of a definitive trial to evaluate the costs and effects of using dental-hygienist-therapists to undertake the check-up.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hill H, Birch S, Tickle M, McDonald R, Brocklehurst P. The technical efficiency of oral healthcare provision: Evaluating role substitution in National Health Service dental practices in England. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017; 45:310-316. [PMID: 28239951 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In many countries increasing use is being made of dental care professionals (DCPs) to provide aspects of clinical activity previously undertaken by dentists. This study evaluates the differences in practice efficiency associated with the utilisation of DCPs in the provision of General Dental Services in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. METHODS One hundred twenty-one NHS practices completed a questionnaire and shared practice information held at the NHS Business Services Authority. Practice efficiency was estimated using data envelopment analysis with the robustness of the findings checked using Stochastic Frontier Model estimation. RESULTS Dental practices operated at an estimated mean level of technical efficiency of 64%. Variations among practices in the use of DCPs were not associated with variations in practice efficiency after controlling for other staffing levels, patient population characteristics and practice variables. CONCLUSIONS The current NHS dental contract limits the potential for efficiency improvements by setting annual practice activity targets that produce little incentive for role substitution. Whilst DCPs may by practising efficiently, this is not reflected in practice-level efficiency, possibly because of dentists using the time released for other non-NHS activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hill
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Division of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Birch
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Tickle
- Division of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brocklehurst P, Birch S, McDonald R, Hill H, O’Malley L, Macey R, Tickle M. Determining the optimal model for role substitution in NHS dental services in the UK: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMaximising health gain for a given level and mix of resources is an ethical imperative for health-service planners. Approximately half of all patients who attend a regular NHS dental check-up do not require any further treatment, whereas many in the population do not regularly attend. Thus, the most expensive resource (the dentist) is seeing healthy patients at a time when many of those with disease do not access care. Role substitution in NHS dentistry, where other members of the dental team undertake the clinical tasks previously provided by dentists, has the potential to increase efficiency and the capacity to care and lower costs. However, no studies have empirically investigated the efficiency of NHS dental provision that makes use of role substitution.Research questionsThis programme of research sought to address three research questions: (1) what is the efficiency of NHS dental teams that make use of role substitution?; (2) what are the barriers to, and facilitators of, role substitution in NHS dental practices?; and (3) how do incentives in the remuneration systems influence the organisation of these inputs and production of outputs in the NHS?DesignData envelopment analysis was used to develop a productive efficiency frontier for participating NHS practices, which were then compared on a relative basis, after controlling for patient and practice characteristics. External validity was tested using stochastic frontier modelling, while semistructured interviews explored the views of participating dental teams and their patients to role substitution.SettingNHS ‘high-street’ general dental practices.Participants121 practices across the north of England.InterventionsNo active interventions were undertaken.Main outcome measuresRelative efficiency of participating NHS practices, alongside a detailed narrative of their views about role substitution dentistry. Social acceptability for patients.ResultsThe utilisation of non-dentist roles in NHS practices was relatively low, the most common role type being the dental hygienist. Increasing the number of non-dentist team members reduced efficiency. However, it was not possible to determine the relative efficiency of individual team members, as the NHS contracts only with dentists. Financial incentives in the NHS dental contract and the views of practice principals (i.e. senior staff members) were equally important. Bespoke payment and referral systems were required to make role substitution economically viable. Many non-dentist team members were not being used to their full scope of practice and constraints on their ability to prescribe reduced efficiency further. Many non-dentist team members experienced a precarious existence, commonly being employed at multiple practices. Patients had a low level of awareness of the different non-dentist roles in a dental team. Many exhibited an inherent trust in the professional ‘system’, but prior experience of role substitution was important for social acceptability.ConclusionsBetter alignment between the financial incentives within the NHS dental contract and the use of role substitution is required, although professional acceptability remains critical.Study limitationsOutput data collected did not reflect the quality of care provided by the dental team and the input data were self-reported.Future workFurther work is required to improve the evidence base for the use of role substitution in NHS dentistry, exploring the effects and costs of provision.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Birch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lucy O’Malley
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Macey
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ersöz M, Uz Z, Malkoç S, Karataş M. A Patient- and Family-Centered Care Approach to Orthodontics: Assessment of Feedbacks from Orthodontic Patients and Their Families. Turk J Orthod 2016; 29:38-43. [PMID: 30112472 DOI: 10.5152/turkjorthod.2016.160012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 04/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate orthodontic patients and their families' clinical satisfaction and their perception of dentists in the framework of the Patient and Family Centered Care (PFCC) concept. Methods The study population comprised patients treated at the Orthodontics clinic and their families. A mixed method research with quantitative and qualitative components was employed by conducting questionnaires with 62 patients and 65 parents. Collected data were recorded on the computer, and analyses were performed. Results A majority of the patients who received treatment at our clinic were high school graduates, while their parents were university graduates. The patient's and their parents' overall satisfaction were similar. We also found that the patients and their parents expected doctors to have ethical perception and professional behavior in the treatment process. Conclusion According to the results obtained from the survey questionnaires, the patients and their parents expect a dentist to have the following qualities: courtesy, friendliness, respect, punctuality, communication skills, and knowledgeableness. Dentists can optimize clinical and patient satisfaction by providing care and attention based on the principles of patient centered care (PCC) and PFCC and shaped in accordance with the expectations of the patients and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Ersöz
- Department of Orthodontics, İnönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Zehra Uz
- Department of Orthodontics, İnönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Sıddık Malkoç
- Department of Orthodontics, İnönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Karataş
- Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, İnönü University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wanyonyi KL, Radford DR, Harper PR, Gallagher JE. Alternative scenarios: harnessing mid-level providers and evidence-based practice in primary dental care in England through operational research. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2015; 13:78. [PMID: 26369553 PMCID: PMC4570749 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care dentistry, strategies to reconfigure the traditional boundaries of various dental professional groups by task sharing and role substitution have been encouraged in order to meet changing oral health needs. AIM The aim of this research was to investigate the potential for skill mix use in primary dental care in England based on the undergraduate training experience in a primary care team training centre for dentists and mid-level dental providers. METHODS An operational research model and four alternative scenarios to test the potential for skill mix use in primary care in England were developed, informed by the model of care at a primary dental care training centre in the south of England, professional policy including scope of practice and contemporary evidence-based preventative practice. The model was developed in Excel and drew on published national timings and salary costs. The scenarios included the following: "No Skill Mix", "Minimal Direct Access", "More Prevention" and "Maximum Delegation". The scenario outputs comprised clinical time, workforce numbers and salary costs required for state-funded primary dental care in England. RESULTS The operational research model suggested that 73% of clinical time in England's state-funded primary dental care in 2011/12 was spent on tasks that may be delegated to dental care professionals (DCPs), and 45- to 54-year-old patients received the most clinical time overall. Using estimated National Health Service (NHS) clinical working patterns, the model suggested alternative NHS workforce numbers and salary costs to meet the dental demand based on each developed scenario. For scenario 1:"No Skill Mix", the dentist-only scenario, 81% of the dentists currently registered in England would be required to participate. In scenario 2: "Minimal Direct Access", where 70% of examinations were delegated and the primary care training centre delegation patterns for other treatments were practised, 40% of registered dentists and eight times the number of dental therapists currently registered would be required; this would save 38% of current salary costs cf. "No Skill Mix". Scenario 3: "More Prevention", that is, the current model with no direct access and increasing fluoride varnish from 13.1% to 50% and maintaining the same model of delegation as scenario 2 for other care, would require 57% of registered dentists and 4.7 times the number of dental therapists. It would achieve a 1% salary cost saving cf. "No Skill Mix". Scenario 4 "Maximum Delegation" where all care within dental therapists' jurisdiction is delegated at 100%, together with 50% of restorations and radiographs, suggested that only 30% of registered dentists would be required and 10 times the number of dental therapists registered; this scenario would achieve a 52% salary cost saving cf. "No Skill Mix". CONCLUSION Alternative scenarios based on wider expressed treatment need in national primary dental care in England, changing regulations on the scope of practice and increased evidence-based preventive practice suggest that the majority of care in primary dental practice may be delegated to dental therapists, and there is potential time and salary cost saving if the majority of diagnostic tasks and prevention are delegated. However, this would require an increase in trained DCPs, including role enhancement, as part of rebalancing the dental workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina L Wanyonyi
- King's College London Dental Institute, Division of Population and Patient Health, Bessemer Road, London, UK.
| | - David R Radford
- King's College London Dental Institute, Teaching Division, Guys Tower, Guys Hospital, London, UK.
- University of Portsmouth Dental Academy, Hampshire Terrace, Portsmouth, UK.
| | - Paul R Harper
- Cardiff University, School of Mathematics, Cardiff, UK.
| | - Jennifer E Gallagher
- King's College London Dental Institute, Division of Population and Patient Health, Bessemer Road, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Macey R, Glenny A, Walsh T, Tickle M, Worthington H, Ashley J, Brocklehurst P. The efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by hygiene-therapists: a diagnostic test accuracy study. J Dent Res 2015; 94:70S-78S. [PMID: 25604256 PMCID: PMC4541095 DOI: 10.1177/0022034514567335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Regularly attending adult patients are increasingly asymptomatic and not in need of treatment when attending for their routine dental examinations. As oral health improves further, using the general dental practitioner to undertake the "checkup" on regular "low-risk" patients represents a substantial and potentially unnecessary cost for state-funded systems. Given recent regulatory changes in the United Kingdom, it is now theoretically possible to delegate a range of tasks to hygiene-therapists. This has the potential to release the general dental practitioner's time and increase the capacity to care. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of hygiene-therapists when screening for dental caries and periodontal disease in regularly attending asymptomatic adults who attend for their checkup. A visual screen by hygiene-therapists acted as the index test, and the general dental practitioner acted as the reference standard. Consenting asymptomatic adult patients, who were regularly attending patients at 10 practices across the Northwest of England, entered the study. Both sets of clinicians made an assessment of dental caries and periodontal disease. The primary outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity values for dental caries and periodontal disease. In total, 1899 patients were screened. The summary point for sensitivity of dental care professionals when screening for caries and periodontal disease was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87) and 0.89 (0.86 to 0.92), respectively. The summary point for specificity of dental care professionals when screening for caries and periodontal disease was 0.87 (0.78 to 0.92) and 0.75 (0.66 to 0.82), respectively. The results suggest that hygiene-therapists could be used to screen for dental caries and periodontal disease. This has important ramifications for service design in public-funded health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Macey
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - A Glenny
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - T Walsh
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - M Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - H Worthington
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - J Ashley
- General Dental Practitioner, Woodlands Dental Practice, Wirral, UK
| | - P Brocklehurst
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brocklehurst P, Price J, Glenny A, Tickle M, Birch S, Mertz E, Grytten J. The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD009853. [PMID: 24194456 PMCID: PMC6544809 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009853.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methods of remuneration have been linked with the professional behaviour of primary care physicians. In dentistry, this can be exacerbated as clinicians operate their practices as businesses and take the full financial risk of the provision of services. The main methods for remunerating primary care dentists include fee-for-service, fixed salary and capitation payments. The aim of this review was to determine the impact that these remuneration mechanisms have upon primary care dentists' behaviour. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of different methods of remuneration on the level and mix of activities provided by primary care dentists and the impact this has on patient outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 7, 2013); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1947 to 11 June 2013); EMBASE (Ovid) (1947 to 11 June 2013); EconLit (1969 to 11 June 2013); the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) (11 June 2013); and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) (11 June 2013). We conducted cited reference searches for the included studies in ISI Web of Knowledge; searched grey literature sources; handsearched selected journals; and contacted authors of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Primary care dentists were defined as clinicians that deliver routine or mainstream dental care in a primary care environment. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled clinical trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after (CBA) studies and interrupted time series (ITS) studies. The methods of remuneration that we considered were: fee-for-service, fixed salary and capitation payments. Primary outcome measures were: measures of clinical activity; volume of clinical activity undertaken; time taken and clinical session length, or both; clinician type utilised; measures of health service utilisation; access and attendance as a proportion of the population; re-attendance rates; recall frequency; levels of oral health inequalities; non-attendance rates; healthcare costs; measures of patient outcomes; disease reduction; health maintenance; and patient satisfaction. We also considered measures of practice profitability/income and any reported unintended effects of the included methods of remuneration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three of the review authors (PRB, JP, AMG) independently reviewed titles and abstracts and resolved disagreements by discussion. The same three review authors undertook data extraction and assessed the quality of the evidence from all the studies that met the selection criteria, according to Cochrane Collaboration procedures. MAIN RESULTS Two cluster-RCTs, with data from 503 dental practices, representing 821 dentists and 4771 patients, met the selection criteria. We judged the risk of bias to be high for both studies and the overall quality of the evidence was low/very low for all outcomes, as assessed using the GRADE approach.One study used a factorial design to investigate the impact of fee-for-service and an educational intervention on the placement of fissure sealants in permanent molar teeth. The authors reported a statistically significant increase in clinical activity in the arm that was incentivised with a fee-for-service payment. However, the study was conducted in the four most deprived areas of Scotland, so the applicability of the findings to other settings may be limited. The study did not report data on measures of health service utilisation or measures of patient outcomes.The second study used a parallel group design undertaken over a three-year period to compare the impact of capitation payments with fee-for-service payments on primary care dentists' clinical activity. The study reported on measures of clinical activity (mean percentage of children receiving active preventive advice, health service utilisation (mean number of visits), patient outcomes (mean number of filled teeth, mean percentage of children having one or more teeth extracted and the mean number of decayed teeth) and healthcare costs (mean expenditure). Teeth were restored at a later stage in the disease process in the capitation system and the clinicians tended to see their patients less frequently and tended to carry out fewer fillings and extractions, but also tended to give more preventive advice.There was insufficient information regarding the cost-effectiveness of the different remuneration methods. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Financial incentives within remuneration systems may produce changes to clinical activity undertaken by primary care dentists. However, the number of included studies is limited and the quality of the evidence from the two included studies was low/very low for all outcomes. Further experimental research in this area is highly recommended given the potential impact of financial incentives on clinical activity, and particular attention should be paid to the impact this has on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Brocklehurst
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCoupland III BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Juliet Price
- The University of ManchesterSchool of DentistryManchesterUK
| | - Anne‐Marie Glenny
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCochrane Oral Health GroupCoupland III Building, Oxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCoupland III BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Stephen Birch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster UniversityCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics1280 Main Street WestHamiltonCanadaL8S 4K1
| | - Elizabeth Mertz
- San Francisco School of Dentistry, University of CaliforniaPreventative and Restorative Dental Sciences, Suite 4103333 California StreetSan FranciscoUSACA 94118
| | - Jostein Grytten
- University of OsloDepartment of Community DentistryBox 1052BlindernOsloNorway0316
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Protocol for diagnostic test accuracy study: the efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by dental care professionals. BMC Oral Health 2013; 13:45. [PMID: 24053760 PMCID: PMC3849956 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The bulk of service delivery in dentistry is delivered by general dental practitioners, when a large proportion of patients who attend regularly are asymptomatic and do not require treatment. This represents a substantial and unnecessary cost, given that it is possible to delegate a range of tasks to dental care professionals, who are a less expensive resource. Screening for the common dental diseases by dental care professionals has the potential to release general dental practitioner’s time and increase the capacity to care for those who don't currently access services. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of dental care professionals when screening for dental caries and periodontal disease in asymptomatic adults aged eighteen years of age. Methods/design Ten dental practices across the North-West of England will take part in a diagnostic test accuracy study with 200 consecutive patients in each practice. The dental care professionals will act as the index test and the general dental practitioner will act as the reference test. Consenting asymptomatic patients will enter the study and see either the dental care professionals or general dental practitioner first to remove order effects. Both sets of clinicians will make an assessment of dental caries and periodontal disease and enter their decisions on a record sheet for each participant. The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic test accuracy of the dental care professionals and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values will be reported. A number of clinical factors will be assessed for confounding. Discussion The results of this study will determine whether dental care professionals can screen for the two most prevalent oral diseases. This will inform the literature and is apposite given the recent policy change in the United Kingdom towards direct access.
Collapse
|
13
|
Richards W. Does the general dental practitioner have a role in tackling oral health inequalities? Prim Dent J 2013; 2:58-63. [PMID: 24340501 DOI: 10.1308/205016813807440038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
14
|
Reporting a program evaluation: Needs, program plan, intervention, and decisions. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1697-2600(13)70008-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
15
|
Tickle M. Revolution in the provision of dental services in the UK. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40 Suppl 2:110-6. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00729.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Tickle
- Dental Public Health and Primary Care, School of Dentistry; The University of Manchester; Manchester; UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brocklehurst P, Ashley J, Walsh T, Tickle M. Relative performance of different dental professional groups in screening for occlusal caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40:239-46. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00671.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
17
|
Perry JGW. A preliminary investigation into the effect of the use of the Short Message Service (SMS) on patient attendance at an NHS Dental Access Centre in Scotland. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 18:145-9. [PMID: 21968040 DOI: 10.1308/135576111797512810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study´s aim was to assess whether the use of Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders sent to patients prior to their dental appointments improved attendance rates for two dentists at a dental access centre in Kirkcaldy, Fife, Scotland. METHOD Automated SMS text reminders were set up through practice management software at Kirkcaldy Dental Access Centre. Two audits, using a research methodology, were then performed. Failure to attend appointments with the two dentists at 150 consecutive appointments was assessed before and after implementing the SMS text reminders. The null hypothesis that SMS reminders do not improve attendance rates at the dental access centre was tested. The Yates´ corrected chi-square test was applied to the resulting data, with the level for statistical significance set at P<0.05. RESULTS Patients readily accepted the text messages and found them to be non-intrusive. Failed attendance at appointments for the two dentists was reduced from 46/150 (31%) before the SMS text reminders were introduced to 21/150 (14%) after its introduction (P=0.00088). Thus the use of SMS text reminders resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of failed attendances at appointments for the two dentists. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary study, SMS appointment reminders reduced the number of failed appointments significantly. They can provide an automated, non-intrusive, and cost-effective method of improving patient attendance at dental appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G W Perry
- Dental Foundation Trainee, University of Dundee Dental Hospital and School, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brocklehurst P, Tickle M. The policy context for skill mix in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J 2011; 211:265-9. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
19
|
Is skill mix profitable in the current NHS dental contract in England? Br Dent J 2011; 210:303-8. [PMID: 21475274 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The use of skill mix in medicine is now widespread, yet it appears that its use in dentistry is not as prominent. Unlike doctors, dentists are required to mitigate the financial risk produced by their capital investment and ensure an adequate cash flow to cover their annual running costs. Examining the financial incentives for employing dental care professionals is therefore an important step to understand why dentistry appears to lag behind medicine in skill mix. It is also apposite, given the announcement of the coalition government to develop a new contract, which could introduce incentives for the use of dental care professionals in this way. The purpose of this short paper is to examine whether skill mix is profitable for general dental practices under the existing NHS contract in England.
Collapse
|
20
|
Humphreys RE, Richards W, Gill P. Perceptions of first year foundation dentists on oral health education and its role in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2010; 209:601-6. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.1133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2009] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
21
|
Evidence summary: what is the effectiveness of alternative approaches for increasing dental attendance by poor families or families from deprived areas? Br Dent J 2010; 208:167-71. [PMID: 20186203 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In September 2009, members of the newly redeveloped Primary Care Dentistry Research Forum (http://www.dentistryresearch.org) took part in an online vote to identify questions in day-to-day practice that they felt most needed to be answered with conclusive research. The question which received the most votes formed the subject of a critical appraisal of the relevant literature. Each month a new round of voting takes place to decide which further questions will be reviewed. Dental practitioners and dental care professionals are encouraged to take part in the voting and submit their own questions to be included in the vote by joining the website.This paper details a summary of the findings of the second critical appraisal. In conclusion, the critical appraisal has identified that the most effective approaches for increasing dental attendance in families from deprived areas were the mobile dental unit at school premises and the dental access centre. The findings conclude that more high quality research is needed to determine the best ways to address the widely-acknowledged unmet treatment need of children and families in lower socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dyer TA, Dhamija AC. Evaluation of an NHS practice-based minor oral surgery service. Br Dent J 2009; 207:577-82; discussion 574. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
23
|
Gordon E. Dental access centres. Br Dent J 2009; 206:563; author reply 563. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|