Patterns of failure in gastric carcinoma after D2 gastrectomy and chemoradiotherapy: a radiation oncologist's view

American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Locoregional Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the data regarding the use of neoadjuvant, perioperative, surgical, and adjuvant treatment options in localized gastric cancer patients and to develop Appropriate Use Criteria recommended by a panel of experts convened by the American Radium Society.

METHODS

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses methodology was used to develop an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed phase 2/2R/3 trials, as well as meta-analyses found within the Ovid Medline database between 2010 and 2020. The expert panel then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 5 representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi).

RESULTS

For patients with medically operable locally advanced gastric cancer, the strongest recommendation was for perioperative chemotherapy based on high-quality data. Acceptable alternatives included surgery followed by either chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). For patients with upfront resection of stages I to III gastric cancer (no neoadjuvant therapy), the group strongly recommended adjuvant therapy with either chemotherapy alone or CRT, based on high-quality data. For patients with locally advanced disease who received preoperative chemotherapy without tumor regression, the group strongly recommended postoperative chemotherapy or postoperative CRT. Finally, for medically inoperable gastric cancer patients, there was moderate consensus recommending definitive concurrent CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation, either in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative setting, results in improved survival rates for patients compared with surgery alone. For inoperable patients, definitive CRT is a reasonable treatment option, though largely palliative.

A qualitative classification signature for post-surgery 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) is a preferred regimen for post-surgery gastric cancer (GC). However, the survival outcome of 5-FU-based ACRT varies greatly among different GC patients. Thus, it is necessary to classify which patients may benefit from 5-FU-based ACRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected 577 GC and 84 adjacent normal samples for training and 675 GC samples for validation. Based on the within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene expression levels, reversal gene pairs were selected, and the pairs correlating with overall survival (OS) of GC patients receiving 5-FU-based ACRT were identified as candidates. Finally, an optimized set of candidate gene pairs was selected as a classification signature in training data and validated in validation data.

RESULTS

A signature consisting of 34 gene pairs was identified in training data and validated in three independent datasets. The classified low-risk group had better OS than the classified high-risk group. We also analyzed the recurrent free survival or disease free survival (RFS/DFS) of the validation datasets, and the similar results were shown. Furthermore, although the signature was identified based on the OS of GC patients receiving ACRT, it was not a prognostic signature for patients treated with surgery alone, but may be a potential signature for 5-FU-based chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The signature can accurately classify GC patients who may benefit from 5-FU-based ACRT, which could aid clinicians in tailoring more effective GC treatments.

Clinical Application of Circulating Tumor Cells in Gastric Cancer

Early detection and accurate monitoring of cancer is important for improving clinical outcomes. Endoscopic biopsy and/or surgical resection specimens are the gold standard for diagnosing gastric cancer and are also useful for selecting therapeutic strategies based on the analysis of genomic/immune parameters. However, these approaches cannot be easily performed because of their invasiveness and because these specimens do not always reflect tumor dynamics and drug sensitivities during therapeutic processes, especially chemotherapy. Accordingly, many researchers have tried to develop noninvasive novel biomarkers that can monitor real-time tumor dynamics for early diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and prediction of recurrence and therapeutic efficacy. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are metastatic cells that are released from the primary tumors into the blood stream and comprise a crucial step in hematogenous metastasis. CTCs, as a liquid biopsy, have received a considerable amount of attention from researchers since they are easily accessible in peripheral blood, avoiding the invasiveness associated with traditional biopsy techniques; they can also be used to derive clinical information for monitoring disease status. In this review, with respect to CTCs, we summarize the metastatic cascade, detection methods, clinical applications, and prospects for patients with gastric cancer.

Pathologic and prognostic impacts of FGFR2 amplification in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and systemic review

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2) gene is amplified in up to 15% of patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic significance of FGFR2 amplification has been controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinicopathological impacts of FGFR2 amplification in patients with GC. We performed a systematic computerized search of the electronic databases of PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and selected studies assessing the correlation of FGFR2 amplification with pathologic features and/or prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma. From eight studies, 2,377 patients were included in the pooled analysis of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pathologic findings and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for overall survival. FGFR2 amplification was significantly associated with LN metastasis (OR = 3.93, 95% CI: 2.22-6.96, p < 0.00001) and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.03-5.39, p = 0.04). In addition, patients with GC harboring FGFR2 amplification showed significantly worse survival (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.68-2.59, p < 0.00001), compared with patients with FGFR2-unamplified GC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that FGFR2 amplification is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with GC.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-, epidermal growth factor receptor-, and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor-positive sites of gastric cancer using surgical samples

BACKGROUND

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play critical roles in gastric cancer (GC) progression and are potential targets for novel molecular-targeted agents or photo-immunotherapies. During patient selection, targeted biopsy is the first step. However, heterogeneous expression of RTKs based on the macroscopic appearance in GC has not been extensively addressed. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated differences in RTK expression associated with macroscopic appearance in GC.

METHODS

In total, 375 consecutive patients who had undergone gastrectomy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East and who had histologically proven adenocarcinoma, available archived tumor sample, and no history of chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. For these cases, tissue microarray (TMA) samples were examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Based on the results of IHC, cases were selected for detailed examination. We re-evaluated IHC scores in more than three tumor blocks per case and comparatively evaluated differences in IHC expression in RTKs between the mucosal portion (MuP) and invasive portion (InP).

RESULTS

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-, and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (c-MET)-positive rates were 6, 9, and 20%, respectively. Twenty-two cases were then analyzed to assess differences in IHC expression levels in the same lesion. Concordance rates of positive staining of HER2, EGFR, and MET between MuP and whole tumor were 100, 40, and 56% and those with InP were 46, 100, and 56%.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid underestimating expression status, biopsies must be taken from MuP for HER2, InP for EGFR, and both proportions for c-MET.

Pathological and Prognostic Impacts of FGFR2 Overexpression in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2) protein expression by immunohistochemistry has been reported in up to 60% of patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the clicopathological impacts of high FGFR2 expression have not been consistent among studies. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the pathological and prognostic significance of FGFR2 overexpression in patients with GC. A systematic search of the electronic databases including PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed. From ten studies, 4,294 patients were included in the pooled analyses of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pathological features and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for overall survival according to the FGFR2 expression status. Compared with tumors showing low FGFR2 expression, GCs with FGFR2 overexpression revealed deeper depth of invasion (pT3-4) (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.70-4.06, p < 0.0001), higher rate of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.31-2.67, p < 0.0001), and more advanced stage (III-IV) (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07-2.96, p = 0.03). In addition, patients with FGFR2-overexpressed GC showed significantly worse survival than those with FGFR2-low tumor (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.25-1.58, p < 0.00001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that FGFR2 overexpression is associated with poor pathological features and prognosis in patients with GC.

Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Gastric Cancer: Implications for Target Definition

The INT0116 trial was a milestone study and laid the foundation for the adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) associated to concurrent chemotherapy (CT) for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) after gastrectomy. However, it is still controversial whether adding RT to CT could further benefit D2-dissected GC patients. The ARTIST trial indicated that the addition of RT to CT did not have a positive impact on disease-free survival (DFS). Nevertheless, in a subgroup of 396 patients with positive pathological lymph nodes, combined treatment with RT was superior to CT alone. A similar randomized Chinese trial confirmed the superiority of adding RT to CT in terms of DFS for patients with D2 lymphadenectomy. However, several previous randomized studies provided inconsistent results with the benefits of combined treatment of RT and CT. The inconsistent results of several studies may be due to the differences between tumor epidemiology, treatment policies, and treatment outcomes. During the past decade, major progress in accurate target delineation utilizing RT technology has been observed. However, even though the use of adjuvant RT doubled after the INT-0116 trial results became public, the fraction of patients receiving adjuvant RT was still low according to the SEER database. The low rate of adjuvant RT can partially be explained by concern over toxicity while undergoing RT. Several studies have also defined the specific location of locoregional recurrence for postoperative RT in GC, but these studies are still limited. A number of retrospective studies demonstrated that the most prevalent nodal recurrence was outside the D2 dissection field. In order to overcome the restricted nature of a retrospective study and provide more individual radiation field determination, additional large-scale prospective multicenter studies are required to evaluate the optimal RT target.

Survival outcomes and patterns of failure after D2 dissection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

  The goal of the study was to analyze the incidence and patterns of failure in patients with gastric cancer who received D2 dissection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

  From January 2004 to October 2015, 324 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical D2 resection followed by postoperative CRT were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics and patterns of failure were retrospectively reviewed to identify factors associated with survival and recurrence.

RESULTS

  After a median follow-up of 30 months, the 3-year overall survival and 3-year disease-free survival rates of these patients were 60.3 and 51.1%, respectively. 117 patients had recurrence or metastasis, with peritoneal recurrence as the most frequent (20.7%), followed by distant metastasis (14.2%). The most commonly involved distant organs were the liver (5.9%) and bone (4.9%). Locoregional failure occurred in 39 patients (12.0%), with isolated regional failure occurring in only 23 (7.1%). Further multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed N stage to be an independent risk factor for distant failure-free survival (p = 0.012). Independent risk factors for peritoneal metastasis were tumor differentiation (p = 0.022), T stage (p =0.035) and vascular invasion (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative CRT has a potential effect on optimizing locoregional control, resulting in only 12.0% of locoregional failure. In patients after D2 resection and adjuvant CRT, peritoneal metastasis was the leading pattern of failure, followed by distant metastasis. Advances in knowledge: Peritoneal recurrence was the most common pattern of failure after D2 dissection and adjuvant CRT, followed by distant metastasis, whereas locoregional relapse was relatively rare. Selection of patients based on the predicted risk of each recurrence pattern may be a reasonable approach to the optimization of treatment strategies.

Prospective phase II trial of pazopanib plus CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer

We designed a single-arm, open label phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib with CapeOx (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) in metastatic /recurrent advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. Previously untreated AGC patients received capecitabine (850 mg/m² bid, day 1–14) plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m², day 1) in combination with pazopanib (800 mg, day 1–21) every three weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of the disease or intolerable toxicity was observed. In all, 66 patients were treated with pazopanib plus CapeOx. The median age of the patients was 51.5 years (range, 23.0–77), and the median ECOG performance status was 1 (0–1). Among all 66 patients, one complete response and 37 partial responses were observed (overall response rate, 62.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 45.7–73.5% accounting for the 2-stage design of this trial). Stable disease was observed in 23 patients (34.8%), revealing a 92.4% disease control rate. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.4) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.1–12.9), respectively. Thirty-four patients (51.5%) experienced a treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or more. The most common toxicities of grade 3 or more were neutropenia (15.1%), anemia (10.6%), thrombocytopenia (10.6%), anorexia (7.6%), nausea (3.0%), and vomiting (3.0%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of pazopanib and CapeOx showed moderate activity and an acceptable toxicity profile as a first-line treatment in metastatic / recurrent AGC patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01130805).

Lymph Node Burden as a Predictive Factor for Selective Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After a D2 Dissection: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The role of adjuvant radiation in locally advanced gastric cancer after a D2 lymph node dissection is not well defined. The Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Stomach Cancer trial demonstrated a benefit in selected patients with positive lymph nodes. This study further defines lymph node burden as a predictive factor for adjuvant radiation in locally advanced gastric cancer after radical D2 lymph node dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-six patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and D2 dissections were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into 2 equal and well-balanced groups based on clinicopathologic characteristics, with half receiving chemoradiation and the other half chemotherapy alone. Clinical outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared. Lymph node ratio (LNR) was defined as ratio of positive to examined nodes. Chemotherapies were fluorouracil-based regimens. Radiation was prescribed to 45 Gy (range, 45 to 50.4 Gy) using 3-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques.

RESULTS

There was no difference between patients treated with or without radiation in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (57.0% vs. 62.0%, P=0.30) or 3-year overall survival (72.8% vs. 77.4%, P=0.23). However, patients with LNR>0.65 or 3 to 6 positive nodes (N2) had improved 3-year DFS and 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the chemoradiation group (LNR>0.65 vs. LNR≤0.65: 3-y DFS: 35.8% vs. 0%, P=0.052, 3-y DMFS: 75.2% vs. 0%, P=0.026; N2 vs. non-N2: 3-y DFS: 84.7% vs. 57.1%, P=0.046, 3-y DMFS: 100.0% vs. 65.3%, P=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

N2 or LNR>0.65 may be indications for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Further randomized studies are needed for validation.

Patterns of Care for Radiotherapy in the Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Twelve-Year Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea

Purpose

Although Korea has the highest incidence of gastric cancer worldwide and D2-lymphadenectomies are routinely performed, radiotherapy (RT) practice patterns have not been well studied. Therefore, we examined RT usage trends for neoadjuvant/adjuvant patients and identified factors associated with RT. We also examined survival benefits and net medical cost advantages of adding RT.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy from 2002-2013 were identified using National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort.

Results

Annually, 30.9 cases per 100,000 population in crude rate underwent gastrectomy in 230 hospitals and 49.8% received neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in 182 hospitals. For neoadjuvant/adjuvant patients, postoperative chemo-RT was administered in 4% of cases in 26 hospitals. No significant trends regarding treatment type were observed over time. Having undergone RT was inversely associated with being ≥ 60 years old and having a low income. Having undergone RT was positively related to having a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, hospital location and hospital volume (≥ 2,000 beds). Significant portions of patients treated with RT in this nation (52%) were concentrated in one large-volume hospital. Use of RT linked to increased cost of primary treatment, yet not to reduced overall medical expense. RT did not influence both on overall and disease-specific survivals after adjusting for potential confounders (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

RT was uncommonly utilized as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment by physicians in Korea. Despite intrinsic drawback in this data, we did not find either survival benefit or net medical cost advantage by adding RT in adjuvant treatment.

D2-resected stage IIIc gastric cancer patients benefit from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Although adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been an important part in the treatment of gastric cancer, whether or not adjuvant radiation can benefit patients undergoing resection with D2 lymph node dissection remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on patients with D2‐resected gastric cancer. A total of 337 patients with resected gastric cancer treated at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 2004 to 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were divided into the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (CRT; n = 124) and the adjuvant chemotherapy group (CT; n = 213). The primary endpoints were disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with toxicity as the secondary endpoint. A subgroup analysis was performed based on clinical staging. The two groups were comparable in baseline characteristic, except for the number of lymph nodes dissected. The median OSs in the CRT and CT groups were 51.0 months and 48.6 months, respectively (P = 0.251), and the median DFSs were 40.7 months and 31.2 months, respectively (P = 0.112). Subgroup analysis revealed that the median OSs in patients at stage IIIc in the CRT group and CT group were 29.0 and 23.0 months, respectively (P = 0.049), and those of the median DFSs were 21.2 and 15.1 months, respectively (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in main adverse events between two groups. Collectively, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer patients with D2 resection was well tolerated. For Stage IIIc patients, the addition of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significant benefit in both OS and DFS.

Retrospective assessment of patterns of recurrence relative to radiotherapy volumes for adjuvant conformal chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Since the Intergroup 0116 study was published in 2000, adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy using CT-planned and 3D conformal/intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been offered routinely to fit patients with resected gastric cancer at Princess Margaret Hospital .The objective of this study was to analyze patterns of disease recurrence with respect to the radiotherapy volumes.

METHODS

For the date and site (local, locoregional, or distant) of the first recurrence, medical records were reviewed for all patients treated at Princess Margaret Hospital with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gastric adenocarcinoma (January 1, 2000 to November 30, 2009). Patients whose recurrences were limited to local and/or regional sites were selected for further analysis. Available diagnostic imaging of the recurrence site was registered to the original planning radiotherapy dataset for contouring. If necessary to respect changes in anatomy, the contour was translocated on the basis of anatomic descriptors. The center of mass for each recurrence was identified as a point and its location was categorized according to the isodose encompassing it; in field (90 % or more), marginal (50-89 %), or out of field (less than 50 %).

RESULTS

Of all 197 patients, 14 (7 %) had isolated locoregional failure, constituting 20 % of all 71 patients with a recurrence. Successful fusions were feasible in five cases. Of these recurrences, four were in field and one was marginal. In a further four cases, visual inspection was used, showing one in-field recurrence, one marginal recurrence, and two out-of-field recurrences. In five patients, either a useable original dataset or diagnostic imaging of the recurrence was not available.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of isolated local/locoregional tumor recurrence in this study were low. Of the small number of recurrences available for analysis, most (five of nine) were in field. Further studies involving a larger cohort of patients might allow a more meaningful analysis of trends in the recurrence site with evolving radiotherapy techniques.

Value of FGFR2 expression for advanced gastric cancer patients receiving pazopanib plus CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to use immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the effect of FGFR2 and VEGFR2 expression on treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic or recurrent advanced gastric cancer (AGC) receiving a combination of pazopanib with CapeOx (capecitabine and oxaliplatin).

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, open-label phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib with CapeOx in 66 patients with metastatic or recurrent AGC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01130805). IHC analysis of FGFR2 and VEGFR2 was possible in 54 patients (81.8 %).

RESULTS

Among 54 patients, the median age was 51.5 years (range 23-72 years). Male patients were 59.3 %. Seven patients (13.5 %) had tumor tissues that expressed FGFR2 by IHC. No patients had tumors that expressed VEGFR2. Among seven patients with tumors with FGFR2 expression, six achieved partial response (PR) with a 85.7 % response rate and one patient with stable disease. Among 47 patients with tumors without FGFR2 expression, one had complete response and 27 had PR (59.5 %). A significant difference in PFS was seen between patients who were positive and negative for FGFR2 using IHC (8.5 vs. 5.6 months, P = 0.050). By prognostic analysis for PFS, only FGFR2 status by IHC (positive vs. negative) had significant prognostic value for predicting PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

FGFR2 expression by IHC might be a useful biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic or recurrent AGC treated with a combination of pazopanib and CapeOx.

A retrospective study on intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy after D2 radical surgery for gastric carcinoma

In order to investigate the clinical value of different chemotherapies, the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy following D2 radical surgery for gastric carcinoma was evaluated in this study. A total of 102 patients who underwent D2 radical surgery for gastric carcinoma followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between January, 2008 and March, 2012, were selected. The 5/7 field intensity-modulated radiation therapy was used, with a planning target volume dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Among these patients, 45 were administered 400 mg/m²/day fluorouracil and 20 mg/m²/day tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol through intravenous infusion 4 days before and 3 days after the radiotherapy (F-CRT group), while 57 patients received 825 mg/m² capecitabine orally twice a day (C-CRT group). The 3-year overall and the disease-free survival rates were 75.5 and 70.5%, respectively. The overall 3-year survival rates of the F-CRT and C-CRT groups were 72.2 and 78.5% (P>0.05), respectively, and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 67.7 and 72.8% (P>0.05), respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups. However, during the concurrent CRT, significant differences were found in the incidence of grade 1-2 haematological toxicity between the F-CRT and C-CRT groups (73.3 vs. 50.9%, respectively; χ² =5.320, P=0.021). Significant differences were also found in the incidence of grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions between the two groups (77.8 vs. 57.9%, respectively; χ²=4.474, P=0.034). Therefore, intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy following D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer was found to be safe and effective. In addition, radiotherapy was better tolerated and more likely to be completed using C-CRT rather than F-CRT.

A phase II study of adjuvant S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by S-1-based chemoradiotherapy for D2-resected gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Surgery is the only possible curative treatment for gastric cancer. However, the high recurrence rate makes gastric cancer difficult to cure by surgery alone. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant treatment, including S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with concurrent S-1.

METHODS

Patients with radically D2-resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach of stage IB-IV (M0) were eligible. Patients were treated with S-1 (40-60 mg depending on the patient's body surface area) twice daily for 3 weeks and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) intravenously on day 1 every 5 weeks. Patients received CRT (45 Gy of radiation at 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks with the same dose of S-1 during radiation) followed by two additional cycles of S-1/cisplatin. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the 3-year overall survival rate and toxicities.

RESULTS

Until May 2012, 46 patients were enrolled, and 34 (73.9%) completed the planned treatment. The median age was 53 years (range: 31-69 years), and the numbers of patients with stage IB, II, III and IV disease were 0, 17, 25 and 4, respectively. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (28.2%), nausea (17.4%), vomiting (8.7%) and anorexia (15.2%). At the time of analysis, after a median follow-up period of 56.5 months (3.03-74.0 months), 16 recurrence events and 15 deaths were reported. The estimated 3-year DFS and survival rates were 65.2 and 76.1%, respectively. The most common site of recurrence was the peritoneum (n = 12).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this phase II study show that intensified adjuvant treatment with S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy and S-1-based chemoradiotherapy was tolerable and effective in reducing disease recurrence. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be effective in D2-resected gastric cancer. Although the data here are promising, a randomized trial is needed between patients treated with the current regimen and an appropriate comparator arm.

Effects of adjuvant radiotherapy on completely resected gastric cancer: A radiation oncologist's view of the ARTIST randomized phase III trial

PURPOSE

We investigated which subgroups might benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and suggested optimal RT targets by analyzing the results of the Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Stomach Cancer (ARTIST) trial.

METHODS

We conducted randomized controlled trial in 458 gastric cancer patients. Patients were randomly assigned to XP (6 cycles of capecitabine and) or XPRT (2 cycles of XP+RT 45Gy/25 fraction with capecitabine+2 cycles of XP) groups after D2 resection. Minimum follow-up was 5years.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 77 patients (33.8%) in the XP arm and 60 (26.1%) in the XPRT arm experienced recurrence. Among these patients, locoregional recurrence (LRR) developed in 44 (9.6%; 29 in XP, 15 in XPRT; P=0.03). The local recurrence rate (4.8%) did not vary between arms. Regional recurrence was the most important difference between the two groups (23 in the XP arm, 5 in the XPRT arm, P<0.001). LRR-free survival (LRRFS) was significantly different between study arms (P=0.03), especially in patients with LN metastasis (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT after D2 resection in gastric cancer reduced LRR, especially in group 3 LNs, and improved LRRFS. Patients with LN metastasis benefited more from the adjuvant RT treatment than the other subgroups.

Radiotherapy patterns of care in gastric adenocarcinoma: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. Two standard approaches for treatment of resectable GAC include adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy [per Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) trial and perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil (ECF) chemotherapy per Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial]. Controversy remains regarding the most appropriate treatment strategy to decrease recurrence rates and improve survival following surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze how patterns of care for patients with GAC treated at Emory University Hospital changed following publication of the MAGIC trial in 2006.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of 150 patients who underwent resection for GAC between December 2000 and June 2013. Patients were divided into two cohorts, Early [2000-2006] and late [2007-2013]. The primary objective was to compare the number of patients assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT) vs. perioperative chemotherapy (PC) throughout the study period and secondarily assess for recurrence patterns and survival outcomes for patients assigned to those two strategies.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2013, 124 patients received adjuvant therapy for GAC. Fifty-four patients were treated with PC and 70 patients with aCRT. The early cohort included 56 patients, and the late cohort included 94 patients. There was no statistical difference in the number of patients receiving aCRT between the Early and Late cohorts [n=23 (50%) vs. 35 (38%) respectively, P=0.21]. PC increased from 2 patients (3.6%) in the Early cohort to 32 patients (34%) in the Late cohort (P<0.001). Four-year overall survival (OS) was 32.6% for the Early cohort and 68.8% for the Late cohort (P=0.010). Overall recurrence rate was 25.3% with no significant difference in rates of recurrence seen between the Early and Late cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

PC has become more prevalent in patients treated at Emory following publication of the MAGIC trial in 2006. OS, but not recurrence rates, has also improved since publication. Although improved survival is suggestive of improved care, the question of optimal treatment regimen remains open. Further prospective comparisons of PC and aCRT are needed to identify patient and disease parameters that may guide therapy selection.

Resected gastric cancer with D2 dissection: advances in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy techniques

Surgery is the main treatment option for locally advanced gastric cancer. D2 dissection has been recommended worldwide as standard lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer. Furthermore, the role of peri- or postoperative chemotherapy for D2-dissected gastric cancer has been established in both Western and European countries. It has been disputed whether adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy could further benefit those patients. Until recently, studies from Korea and China may have made it clear. In North America, however, the INT-0116 trial does not rule out that chemoradiotherapy is effective in patients with D2 dissection, but the ongoing CRITICS trial will, hopefully, clarify this. In addition, literature published in the past decade supports the theory that improved radiotherapy techniques are likely to accurately deliver radiation dose and significantly reduce radiation toxicity. Finally, the status of E2F-1 and HER-2 may be associated with efficacy of radiotherapy based on retrospective studies.

Chemoradiation for gastric cancer: controversies, updates and novel techniques

The INT0116 trial established the role of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in the multidisciplinary approach to the management of locally advanced gastric cancer. However, whether adjuvant CRT is indispensable for patients undergoing D2 dissection remains undefined. The adjuvant chemoradiation therapy in stomach cancer (ARTIST) trial, which was designed to compare adjuvant chemotherapy to CRT, failed to demonstrate differences in disease-free and overall survival in the whole study group; however, subgroup analysis indicated that patients with lymph node metastasis may benefit from additional radiation. A follow-up ARTIST II trial is currently under way. The efficacy of adjuvant CRT remains controversial because of variation among studies in the inclusion criteria and treatment delivery methods; however, the identification of patients who would benefit from CRT is critical. Advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy protect normal tissues via motion management and decreased radiation-induced toxicity and contribute to plan optimization. Further studies integrating clinical and molecular factors as well as neoadjuvant CRT are warranted.

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a clinical feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the medical and technical feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in high-risk nonmetastatic gastric cancer stage II and III after primary gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective nonrandomized phase II trial was performed on 25 consecutive patients with gastric cancer with high risk (T3-4, N1-3, G2-3, R0-1). The dose delivered was 45 Gy (1.80 Gy per fraction) in IMRT technique. Concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy at 225 mg/m(2) was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion. Primary endpoints were acute gastrointestinal toxicity (CTC 4.0) and technical feasibility of IMRT in regard to dose planning and radiation delivery.

RESULTS

Early acute events were defined as clinical and chemical adverse effects of IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy during treatment. By definition, 90 days after the end of IMRT has been evaluated as acute-phase toxicity. No patient had grade 4 or higher acute adverse events. Clinical grade 3 toxicity occurred in two patients (8%) with diarrhea and in one case (4%) with nausea. Hematological changes with grade 3 occurred in three cases (12%) with hemoglobin decrease, in five cases (25%) as leukopenia, and in one case (4%) with thrombocytopenia. The mean dose for liver was 16 Gy and the percentage volume exceeding 30 Gy (V30) was 21%. Mean dose for right and left kidney was 9 and 13 Gy, respectively, and V20 was 9% and 13%, respectively. Heart received a median dose of 15 Gy and V40 was 17%. The mean dose to the bowel was 11 Gy and V40 was 6%. Spinal cord had at maximum 33 Gy in median. Specifics of dose distribution, including the coverage, for the target region were as follows: minimum was 33 Gy, maximum 48.6 Gy, and mean dose 44.6 Gy. The prescribed dose (45 Gy) covered 99% and 95% of planning target volume (OTV) in 66% and 92% of cases, respectively. Median PTV was 15.77 ml (range, 805-3,604 ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the practical feasibility of IMRT in adjuvant treatment in high-risk gastric cancer in the postoperative setting as a proof of principle. Acute toxicity has been tolerable.

Can capecitabine be used instead of concurrent bolus 5-FU in postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

5-fluoro-uracil (FU) is a common agent in postoperative chemoradiation in gastric adenocarcinoma. However, FU is not well tolerated in a significant proportion of patients. Capecitabine (CA) is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is preferentially converted to active 5-FU and is one of the agents used instead of FU in such cases. We compared the toxicity, local and distant control and survival rates with FU or oral CA during the course of concurrent radiotherapy to assess the role of CA used instead of FU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an analysis of survival, disease control and toxicity data in 46 patients treated with postoperative chemoradiation following total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma with either FU or CA between January 2008 and December 2012.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 19 months (range: 3-59), median survival time was 23 (± 6.08) months and 1-3 years overall survival (OS) rates were 64.9- 39% for all patients. Compared with the CA regimen, the incidence of treatment interruption was higher with FU (p=0.023), but no significant differences were seen in local control (p=0.510), distant recurrences (p=0.721) and survival rates (p=0.866) among patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent CA with radiotherapy seems to be a more tolerable and an equally effective regimen for the postoperative treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma when compared to FU.

Dosimetric and Clinical Influence of 3D Versus 2D Planning in Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric and clinical influence of computed tomography-based (3-dimensional [3D]) simulation versus conventional 2-dimensional (2D)-based simulation in postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with advanced gastric cancer in terms of parallel opposed anteroposterior-posteroanterior field arrangement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective stage-matched cohort study was conducted in 158 patients treated with adjuvant CRT following curative surgery and D2 dissection from 2006 to 2008 at Samsung Medical Center: 98 patients in the 3D group; and 60 patients in the 2D group. For comparison of the dosimetric parameters between 3D plan and 2D plan, second sets of radiation treatment plans were generated according to the same target delineation method used in the 2D group for each patient in the 3D group (V2D). Acute toxicity, recurrence, and survival were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 28 months (range, 5 to 51 months).

RESULTS

The 3D group showed better dose-volume histogram (DVH) profiles than the V2D group for all dosimetric parameters, including the kidneys, liver, spinal cord, duodenum, pancreas, and bowel. However, no difference in acute gastrointestinal toxicity and survival outcomes was observed between the 3D group and the 2D group.

CONCLUSION

The 3D plan enabled precise delineation of the target volume and organs at risk by visualization of geometric changes in the internal organs after surgery. The DVH of normal tissues in the 3D plan was superior to that of the V2D plan, but similar clinical features were observed between the 3D group and the 2D group.

Adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. Since the rate of early diagnosis is low, postoperative recurrence and metastasis rates are still high. In recent years, the curative effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy is becoming better with the development of new chemotherapy drugs, targeted drugs, biological immune therapy and postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the progress in postoperative adjuvant therapy for gastric carcinoma.

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in D2-dissected gastric cancer: Is radiotherapy necessary after D2-dissection?

Studies from the Far East have demonstrated that D2-dissection is superior to D0/1-dissection. The effect of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after D2-dissection has not been accepted due to the lack of D2-dissection in Western countries, as well as the potential harmful effect of radiotherapy. In the current NCCN guideline, adjuvant chemotherapy alone is recommended in D2-dissected patients. However, three recent prospective randomized controlled trials in South Korea and China (ARTIST, NCC and Multicenter IMRT Trials) demonstrated that adjuvant CRT can be safely administered to D2-dissected patients with notable benefits. To identify the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the D2-dissected postoperative setting, clinical research attempts should include (1) identification of high-risk patients for loco-regional recurrence who might benefit from CRT; (2) modification of RT target volume based on the findings that failure patterns should be different after D1- and D2-dissection; and (3) integration of new RT techniques to decrease treatment-related toxicity. The present paper is a review of recent studies addressing these fields. Well-designed prospective randomized studies are needed to clearly define the role of adjuvant CRT in D2-dissected gastric cancer, however, future clinical studies should also focus on answering these questions.

[Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma: about 34 cases and review of the literature]

Notre étude consistera en l’évaluation du pronostic des patients porteurs d'un adénocarcinome gastrique opérés et traités par radio-chimiothérapie adjuvante en technique conformationnelle. Entre Janvier 2007 et Décembre 2011, 34 patients ont reçu après une chirurgie radicale (R0 ou R1), un à trois cycles de 5-Fluoro-uracile associé à de l'Elvorine en adjuvant, suivi d'une radio-chimiothérapie selon le même protocole à la dose de 45Gy, puis de deux cycles de chimiothérapie à un mois d'intervalle après la radio-chimiothérapie concomitante. Dans le groupe d’étude, il y avait 34 patients d’âge médian 50 ans (47-58), avec un sexe ratio (H/F) de 2,4. Une chirurgie de type R1 a été réalisée dans 26,5% des cas, et 53% des patients étaient de stade III-IV. Le rapport nombres de ganglions positifs, sur nombre de ganglions prélevés étaient > 0,4 dans 26,5% des cas. Durant le traitement mené à terme, une neutropénie de grade III a été observée chez quatre patients, avec des troubles digestifs (nausées, vomissement, ou diarrhée) de grade I/II dans la majorité des cas. Après un suivi médian de 20 mois, 70,6% des patients étaient en survie sans rechute, et 29,4% ont présenté une récidive métastatique; la survie globale à 5 ans était de 35,4% et la survie sans progression de 58,7%. La radio-chimiothérapie concomitante postopératoire pourrait être un régime efficace et sûre chez les patients ayant bénéficié d'une gastrectomie à visée curative dans le cancer de l'estomac localement avancé.

Simvastatin plus capecitabine-cisplatin versus placebo plus capecitabine-cisplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer: a double-blind randomised phase 3 study

PURPOSE

We aimed to the addition of synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, simvastatin to capecitabine-cisplatin (XP) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histological or cytological confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) at nine centres in Korea. Patients, stratified by disease measurability and participating site, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive capecitabine 1000mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks plus either simvastatin 40 mg or placebo, once daily. Cisplatin was given for 8 cycles; capecitabine and simvastatin were administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01099085.

RESULTS

Between February 2009 and November 2012, 244 patients were enrolled and assigned to treatment groups (120 simvastatin, 124 placebo). Median progression free survival (PFS) for 120 patients allocated XP plus simvastatin was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-6.1) compared with 4.63 months (95% CI 3.5-5.7) for 124 patients who were allocated to XP plus placebo (hazard ratio 0.930, 95% CI 0.684-1.264; p=0.642). 63 (52.5%) of 120 patients in simvastatin group and 70 (56.4%) of 124 had grade 3 or higher adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of 40 mg simvastatin to XP does not increase PFS in our trial, although it does not increase toxicity. Low dose of simvastatin (40 mg) to chemotherapy is not recommended in untargeted population with AGC.

A phase II trial of post-operative chemoradiotherapy for completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy

The optimal post-operative adjuvant treatment for completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy remains controversial. The present study was a phase II trial on post-operative chemoradiotherapy in 30 patients with gastric cancer. Patients with stage II to IV (M0) gastric cancer received two cycles of chemotherapy prior to and following chemoradiotherapy. The chemotherapy consisted of a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m²) and folinic acid (100 mg/m²), which was followed by a 46-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 2,400 mg/m²) through a portable pump, repeated every 3 weeks. The chemoradiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy of radiotherapy for 5 weeks and 5-FU continuous infusion (350 mg/m²/day). In total, 30 patients were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent the chemoradiotherapy treatment as planned. A total of 10 (33.3%) patients relapsed; two (6.7%) locoregional relapses and mediastinum metastases, four (13.3%) peritoneal relapses, and four (13.3%) distant metastases. The three-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 72.7 and 65%, respectively. The toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, consisting of neutropenia, nausea and hand-foot syndrome, were observed. In conclusion, post-operative chemoradiotherapy following complete resection of gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy is feasible in a significant subset of patients.

Surgical treatment of anastomotic recurrence after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of reoperation with curative intent for the treatment of anastomotic recurrent gastric cancer.

Methods

Ten patients with anastomotic recurrence of gastric cancer who underwent reoperation from November 1995 to February 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. The time interval between the first operation and reoperation, recurrence pattern, type of surgery, survival, and postoperative outcome were analyzed.

Results

The average time to recurrence after initial surgery was 48.8 months (median, 23.5 months). Of the ten patients, eight (80.0%) had recurrence at the esophagojejunostomy, one (10.0 %) at the esophagogastrostomy, and two (20.0%) at the esophagus. Among these patients, five had combined metastasis or invasion to major organs in addition to anastomotic recurrence. Complete resection was achieved in five patients (50.0%), and incomplete resection or bypass surgery was performed in the remaining five patients (50.0%). The overall median survival time was 7.0 months (range, 2.2 to 105.5 months). The median survival time following complete resection and palliative surgery (incomplete resection or bypass surgery) was 28.1 months (range, 4.2 to 105.5 months) and 5.5 months (range, 2.2 to 7.5 months), respectively.

Conclusion

Surgical resection of anastomotic recurrent gastric cancer should be implemented only in selected patients in whom complete resection is possible.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophagus for treating locally recurrent gastric cancer at the anastomotic site

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophagus (VATS-E) for the treatment of locally recurrent gastric cancer at the anastomotic site.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION

A 59-year-old man underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Histopathologically, it was mucinous adenocarcinoma [pT1(sm), pN1, sM0, PM(-), DM(-), stage IB]. Local recurrence was detected and he received chemotherapy and radiotherapy; histopathologically, it was identified as mucinous adenocarcinoma [pT1(sm), pN0, sM0, stage IA]. As the local recurrence was uncontrollable, he underwent VATS-E. At the 1-year follow-up, he was recurrence-free.

CONCLUSION

The VATS-E minimally invasive surgery was a very useful technique for anastomotic recurrence after total gastrectomy in our patient.

Radiotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There have been many trials trying to prove the benefit of radiotherapy for gastric cancer; however, the results were either inclusive or controversial. The purpose of the study was to elucidate the effect of radiotherapy on gastric cancer delivered as perioperative or palliative treatment. We conducted systematic searches for trials exploring the effect of radiotherapy on gastric cancer. In the subgroup of patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer, a significant benefit was found on 10-year overall survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61 to 0.91); however, the benefit on 5-year overall survival was not proven (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.45 to 1.01). There are also no significant differences in resection rate and radical resection rate between group of patients receiving radiotherapy and control group with a relative risk (RR) of 1.06 (95%CI, 0.99 to 1.13) and 1.12 (95%CI 0.93 to 1.36), respectively. In the subgroup of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer, survival benefits were found on 3- and 5-year progression-free survival with HR of 0.69 (95%CI, 0.53 to 0.90) and HR of 0.70 (95%CI, 0.61 to 0.80), respectively. Survival benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy on 3- and 5-year progression-free survival were also found; nonetheless, there was no evidence of significant difference in 3-year overall survival (HR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.61 to 1.01). The effect of radiotherapy on 5-year overall survival was also quite controversial. In short, gastric cancer patients could benefit from radiotherapy both in the form of preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.

Defining the target volume for post-operative radiotherapy after D2 dissection in gastric cancer by CT-based vessel-guided delineation

PURPOSE

To determine the recurrent nodal gross tumor volume (rnGTV) based on CT-guided vascular structure to refine the clinical target volume (CTV) delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for advanced gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy with D2 dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed follow-up images from 91 patients with their first regional recurrence after D2 dissection in stage III gastric cancer with N3 disease. We defined rnGTV as recurrent nodes shown in follow-up CT images, in which one diagnostic radiologist with specialty of gastrointestinal tract investigated. We drew rnGTVs at the equivalent location based on the same vessels of reference comparing CT images to recurrence CT images.

RESULTS

We propose vessel-based locations of rnGTVs on CT images with axial and coronal views. We show different patterns of regional recurrence according to the location of primary gastric cancer using CT and digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) images. Frequently recurred sites, overlapped by more than five rnGTVs, are depicted in a DRR image.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests vessel-based delineations of rnGTVs on CT images depending on nodal recurrence sites from follow-up images after D2 lymphadenectomy. Our results could help reduce the inter-observer variation of CTV delineation after D2 dissection in gastric cancer.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction

Background

Due to low tolerance to chemotherapy, the maximum number of cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is 4 in adjuvant gastric clinical trials. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resected locally advanced stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Methodology/Principal Findings

From January 2004 to July 2008, ninety-seven consecutive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients in stages T3–4/N+ were treated with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The recommended treatment plan was radical resection followed by 1–2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and, finally, 4–5 cycles of ACT. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the number of cycles of ACT: group 1 received 4–6 cycles (n = 59), and group 2 received 0–3 cycles (n = 38). The detailed grouping is as follows: RT alone, 2; RT and CT, 18; concurrent RTCT and CT, 41; and CRT, 36. Of the 97 patients, 77 patients received concurrent therapy (CRT, (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine), and 20 received radiotherapy alone because of patient refusal (n = 15) or treatment toxicity (n = 5). After a median follow-up of 44 months, the 3-year disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66.5% and 69.5% for group 1 and 45.5% and 50% for group 2, respectively (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis revealed that 4–6 cycles of ACT, lymphovascular invasion, or peritoneal metastasis were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival or overall survival (p<0.05).

Conclusions/Significance

This study demonstrates that concurrent chemoradiation with adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy is feasible and tolerable for gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma patients. Patients can benefit from more cycles of ACT.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in high risk locally advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

To evaluate treatment outcome of patients with high risk locally advanced gastric cancer after postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Between May 2003 and May 2012, thirteen patients who underwent postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer with resection margin involvement or adjacent structure invasion were retrospectively analyzed. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 10 patients. Median dose of radiation was 50.4 Gy (range, 45 to 55.8 Gy).

Results

The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 48 months (range, 5 to 108 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 42% and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 28%. Major pattern of failure was peritoneal seeding with 46%. Locoregional recurrence was reported in only one patient. Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 54% of the patients. However, there was only one patient with higher than grade 3 toxicity.

Conclusion

Despite reported suggested role of adjuvant radiotherapy with combination chemotherapy in gastric cancer, only very small portion of the patients underwent the treatment. Results from this study show that postoperative chemoradiotherapy provided excellent locoregional control with acceptable and manageable treatment related toxicity in patients with high risk locally advanced gastric cancer. Thus, postoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve treatment result in terms of locoregional control in these high risk patients. However, as these findings are based on small series, validation with larger cohort is suggested.

Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

In gastric adenocarcinoma, high rates of loco-regional recurrences have been reported even after complete resection, and various studies have been tried to find the role of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Among them, Intergroup 0116 trial was a landmark trial, and demonstrated the definite survival benefit in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, compared with surgery alone. However, the INT 0116 trial had major limitation for global acceptance of the INT 0116 regimen as an adjuvant treatment modality because of the limited lymph node dissection. Lately, several randomized studies that were performed to patients with D2-dissected gastric cancer were published. This review summarizes the data about patterns of failure after surgical resection and the earlier prospective studies, including INT 0116 study. Author will introduce the latest studies, including ARTIST trial and discuss whether external beam radiotherapy should be applied to patients receiving extended lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patterns of regional recurrence after curative D2 resection for stage III (N3) gastric cancer: implications for postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To analyze patterns of regional recurrence after curative gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection in patients with stage III (N3) gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, 2918 patients with primary gastric cancer underwent D2 resection at a single institution. A retrospective review was performed on 382 patients in stage III with N3 disease. Of these, 357 patients (93.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. None of the patients received pre- or postoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 56.3 months. The 5-year regional failure free-survival (RFFS) rate was 63.6%. Regional failure (RF) as any component of first recurrence occurred in 91 patients (23.8%), with isolated regional failure occurring in 49 (12.8%). The most commonly involved lymph nodes were the No. 16b, No. 16a, No. 12, No. 14, No. 13, and No. 9 nodes. RFFS was adversely affected by advanced nodal stage (N3b vs. N3a). The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 32.1% and overall survival was 41.5%.

CONCLUSION

The most prevalent nodal recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer was in the nodal basin outside the D2 dissection field. Our findings may help physicians construct a lymph node target volume for radiation treatment of gastric cancer after D2 dissection.

Interobserver variability in target volume delineation in postoperative radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer. A pilot prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to determine the interobserver variability (IV) between radiation oncologists (RO) in target volume delineation for postoperative gastric cancer (GC) radiotherapy planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four physicians were asked to delimitate clinical target volume (CTV) on the same 3D CT images in 9 postoperative radiochemotherapy GC patients. Instructions were given to include tumour bed, remaining stomach, anastomosis, duodenal loop and local lymph nodes. The principal variable was spatial volume discrepancy between the main observer (called "A") and other observers (all called "B"), which were compared using the mathematical formula A⌣B/A⌢B, applied to the 3D CT images using Boolean operators. Analysis of variance with two random effects (observers and patients) was performed.

RESULTS

Mean volumes were 1410 cm(3) for OBA, 1231 cm(3) for OB2, 734.6 cm(3) for OB3 and 1350 cm(3) for OB4. Discrepancies were 519.9±431.6 cm(3) for OB2, 652.1±294.36 cm(3) for OB3 and 225.90±237.07 cm(3) for OB4. Standard deviation ascribed to patients as random effect was 898.6 cm(3) and that ascribed to observers was 198.10 cm(3), considered as a statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant IV in target delineation that can be attributed to many factors depends more on patients' characteristics than RO delineating decisions.

Retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes after postoperative chemoradiotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the survival outcome, patterns of failure, and complications in patients treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2006, 80 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received postoperative concurrent CRT were included. Pathological staging was IB-II in 9%, IIIA in 38%, IIIB in 33%, and IV in 21%. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy of radiation. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of a continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on the first 4 days and last 3 days of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 3 to 83 months). The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survivals were 62%, 59%, and 80%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant factors for disease-free survival were T stage (hazard ratio [HR], 0.278; p = 0.038), lymph node dissection extent (HR, 0.201; p = 0.002), and maintenance oral chemotherapy (HR, 2.964; p = 0.004). Locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in 5 (6%) and 18 (23%) patients, respectively. Mixed failure occurred in 10 (16%) patients. Grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (5%) and one (1%) patient, respectively. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting developed in 8 (10%) patients. Intestinal obstruction developed in one (1%).

CONCLUSION

The survival outcome of the postoperative CRT in advanced gastric cancer was similar to those reported previously. Our postoperative CRT regimen seems to be a safe and effective method, reducing locoregional failure without severe treatment toxicity in advanced gastric cancer patients.

Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial

PURPOSE

The ARTIST (Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Stomach Cancer) trial was the first study to our knowledge to investigate the role of postoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection. This trial was designed to compare postoperative treatment with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus XP plus radiotherapy with capecitabine (XP/XRT/XP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The XP arm received six cycles of XP (capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks) chemotherapy. The XP/XRT/XP arm received two cycles of XP followed by 45-Gy XRT (capecitabine 1,650 mg/m2 per day for 5 weeks) and two cycles of XP.

RESULTS

Of 458 patients, 228 were randomly assigned to the XP arm and 230 to the XP/XRT/XP arm. Treatment was completed as planned by 75.4% of patients (172 of 228) in the XP arm and 81.7% (188 of 230) in the XP/XRT/XP arm. Overall, the addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0862). However, in the subgroup of patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery (n = 396), patients randomly assigned to the XP/XRT/XP arm experienced superior DFS when compared with those who received XP alone (P = .0365), and the statistical significance was retained at multivariate analysis (estimated hazard ratio, 0.6865; 95% CI, 0.4735 to 0.9952; P = .0471). CONCLUSION The addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly reduce recurrence after curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. A subsequent trial (ARTIST-II) in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer is planned.

Post-operative radiochemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer: one department's experience of 56 patients

OBJECTIVES

Prognosis in patients with locally advanced stomach cancer undergoing surgery alone is poor. High local failure rates in gastric cancer have been reported of up to 70%. When a relapse occurs, attempts at curative treatment are generally unsuccessful. A retrospective analysis was performed in order to determine whether post-operative radiochemotherapy improves treatment results in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between November 2004 and July 2008, 56 patients with clinical Stage IB-IV cancer of the stomach underwent curative gastrectomy and adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patients with distant metastases were excluded from the analysis. The total radiation dose was 45.0 Gy. The chemotherapy regimen comprised a 5 day cycle of 5-fluorouracil at 425 mg m(-2) and leucovorin at 20 mg m(-2). Overall survival and disease-free survival, as well as toxicity, were estimated for all patients.

RESULTS

Within the study group there were 7 (13%) local recurrences, 4 (7%) distant metastases and 8 (14%) local and distant relapses. The 2 year overall survival was 48%. A total of 19 (34%) patients developed Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative radiochemotherapy is an effective and safe regimen in patients with curatively resected locally advanced gastric cancer.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: a phase I study of radiotherapy with dose escalation of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX regimen)

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy begins to be more and more widely accepted as a standard adjuvant treatment in gastric cancer. And oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) also reveals to be a very effective regimen in gastric cancer. But the safety and the dosages of FOLFOX combining with radiotherapy are still unknown. This study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of FOLFOX with higher-dose concurrent radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with gastric cancer. Patients with Stage II/III gastric cancer after surgery were recruited. They received one cycle of induction chemotherapy (standard FOLFOX4). Then, they received 50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions in combination with two cycles of concurrent FOLFOX, and oxaliplatin among this regimen was administered with escalating doses. Dose-limiting toxicity including grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was investigated. Fifteen patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: oxaliplatin 55 mg/m(2) (3 patients), 65 mg/m(2) (6 patients), and 75 mg/m(2) (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 patient at 65 mg/m(2) (grade 4 leukopenia) and in 3 patients at 75 mg/m(2) (1 patient had grade 4 leukopenia, 1 had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 had grade 3 stomatitis). Combination chemotherapy FOLFOX with oxaliplatin 65 mg/m(2), d 1; leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 2 h, d1-2; 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), iv, d 1-2 and 600 mg/m(2) civ, 22 h, d 1-2 given concurrently with RT (50.4 Gy) can be recommended as a safer and preferable regimen for the adjuvant treatment of patients with gastric cancer.

Self-expandable metallic stent placement for malignant obstruction in patients with locally recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) provide effective palliation for inoperable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SEMSs in patients with recurrent gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with gastric cancer who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement. The patients had obstructive symptoms due to recurrent gastric cancer after curative-intent subtotal or total gastrectomies. Technical and clinical success rates of stent placement were evaluated and clinical outcomes were compared according to operation types.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients underwent total gastrectomies with esophagojejunostomies and Roux-en-Y reconstructions, 8 underwent subtotal gastrectomies with Billroth I reconstructions, and 12 underwent subtotal gastrectomies with Billroth II reconstructions. Four patients in the Billroth II group received stents in afferent and efferent loops, so a total of 39 stents were placed. Technical success was achieved with 92% (36/39) of stents, and clinical success occurred with 90% (35/39) of stents, with no significant differences among surgery groups or between stent types (covered vs. uncovered). The GOO score (preprocedure: 0.45±0.62) increased by 1 week (2.06±0.51, p<0.001) and was maintained up to 1 month (1.71±1.15, p<0.001 compared with initial score). Complications occurred with 17 of 39 stents (44%) and included 2 perforations, 3 migrations, and 12 restenoses. Median stent patency duration was 10.7 weeks and median survival was 21.3 weeks; these did not significantly differ by surgery group (p=0.25 and 0.93, respectively) or stent type (covered vs. uncovered, p=0.51 and 0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic SEMS placement for obstruction due to recurrent cancer after total or subtotal gastrectomy is feasible and provides effective short-term palliation, independent of the type of surgical procedure or stent (covered vs. uncovered) used.

Gastric carcinoma in China: Current status and future perspectives (Review)

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers in China, with an estimated 380,000 new cases each year, accounting for more than 40% of the worldwide annual cancer incidence. There is geographical clustering of the distribution of gastric cancer in China, with most of the high-risk areas being rural. D2 resection is the standard lymphadenectomy for curative resection in China, but more extensive lymphadenectomy is conducted for selected patients. Perioperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy can be combined with surgery. It remains uncertain which option is best, but if surgery is insufficient, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended. In the palliative setting, although there is no standard first-line chemotherapy, regimens based on taxane, oxaliplatin or capecitabine, or the epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil regimen and its modifications are the most common options selected by Chinese oncologists. Several studies to evaluate target therapy are ongoing, but it is too early to draw any conclusions. However, the development of target therapy is likely to become a milestone in the treatment of gastric cancer.