Salvage chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for taxane- and cisplatin-refractory, metastatic gastric cancer

Comparison of Two Chemotherapy Regimens After First-Line Treatment for HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer

AIM

Metastatic stage gastric cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis and the likelihood of achieving a cure in these patients is low. Treatment response to subsequent-line treatments is poor. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and paclitaxel+carboplatin regimens, which are used in subsequent lines of therapy in advanced-stage gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 40 patients who have metastatic stage gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI or paclitaxel+carboplatin therapy in subsequent lines of therapy between 2017 and 2022. The data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At diagnosis median age was 51 (23-88) years. The tumor was localized in the gastroesophageal junction in eight (20%) patients and in other gastric locations in 32 (80%) patients. At diagnosis, 75% (n=30) of the patients presented with the disease in the metastatic stage, while 25% (n=10) presented with stage II-III disease. Regarding the treatments received in the second and further lines of therapy, 18 (45%) patients received paclitaxel+carboplatin and 22 (55%) patients received a FOLFIRI regimen. Of these treatments, 67.5% (n=27) were given as the second line and 32.5% (n=13) were given as third-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5% in the FOLFIRI arm compared to 16.7% in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.05). Both treatment arms had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of three months (p=0.82). The median overall survival (OS) time was seven months in the FOLFIRI arm compared to eight months in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.71). Side effects were similar between both treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

This study determined that FOLFIRI and paclitaxel+carboplatin treatments have similar OS, PFS, and side effect profiles in subsequent line treatment of gastric cancer. The FOLFIRI treatment regimen yielded a higher ORR.

Augmenting Experimental Gastric Cancer Activity of Irinotecan through Liposomal Formulation and Antiangiogenic Combination Therapy

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Combination chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for advanced GAC. Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) has improved pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug biodistribution compared with irinotecan (IRI, CPT-11). Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the progression and metastasis of GAC. We evaluated the antitumor efficacy of nal-IRI in combination with novel antiangiogenic agents in GAC mouse models. Animal survival studies were performed in peritoneal dissemination xenografts. Tumor growth and PK studies were performed in subcutaneous xenografts. Compared with controls, extension in animal survival by nal-IRI and IRI was >156% and >94%, respectively. The addition of nintedanib or DC101 extended nal-IRI response by 13% and 15%, and IRI response by 37% and 31% (MKN-45 xenografts); nal-IRI response by 11% and 3%, and IRI response by 16% and 40% (KATO-III xenografts). Retardation of tumor growth was greater with nal-IRI (92%) than IRI (71%). Nintedanib and DC101 addition tend to augment nal-IRI or IRI response in this model. The addition of antiangiogenic agents enhanced tumor cell proliferation inhibition effects of nal-IRI or IRI. The tumor vasculature was decreased by nintedanib (65%) and DC101 (58%), while nal-IRI and IRI alone showed no effect. PK characterization in GAC xenografts demonstrated that compared with IRI, nal-IRI treatment groups had higher retention, circulation time, and tumor levels of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38. These findings indicate that nal-IRI, alone and in combination with antiangiogenic agents, has the potential for improving clinical GAC therapy.

Targeted FGFR/VEGFR/PDGFR inhibition with dovitinib enhances the effects of nab-paclitaxel in preclinical gastric cancer models

Standard chemotherapy regimens for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) have limited efficacy and considerable toxicity profiles. Nab-paclitaxel has shown promising antitumor benefits in previous GAC preclinical studies. Dovitinib inhibits members of the receptor tyrosine kinase family including FGFR, VEGFR and PDGFR, and has exhibited antitumor effects in many solid tumors including GAC. Based on the antimitotic, antistromal and EPR effects of nab-paclitaxel, we investigated augmentation of nab-paclitaxel response by dovitinib in multiple GAC preclinical models. In MKN-45 subcutaneous xenografts, inhibition in tumor growth by nab-paclitaxel and dovitinib was 75% and 76%, respectively. Dovitinib plus nab-paclitaxel had an additive effect on tumor growth inhibition and resulted in tumor regression (85% of its original value). Dovitinib monotherapy resulted in minimal improvement in animal survival (25 days) compared to control (23 days), while nab-paclitaxel monotherapy or dovitinib plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy led to a clinically significant lifespan extension of 83% (42 days) and 187% (66 days), respectively. IHC analysis of subcutaneous tumors exhibited reduced tumor cell proliferation and tumor vasculature by dovitinib. In vitro studies demonstrated that dovitinib and nab-paclitaxel individually reduced tumor cell proliferation, with an additive effect from combination therapy. Immunoblot analyses of MKN-45 and KATO-III cells revealed that dovitinib decreased phospho-FGFR, phospho-AKT, phospho-ERK, phospho-p70S6K, phospho-4EBP1, Bcl-2 and increased cleaved PARP-1, cleaved-caspase-3, p27, Bax, Bim, with an additive effect from combination therapy. These results demonstrate that the FGFR/VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitor, dovitinib, has the potential to augment the antitumor effects of nab-paclitaxel, with implications for use in the advancement of clinical GAC therapy.

[Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI after Failure of FOLFOX-4 in Advanced Gastric Cancer]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan based FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients who were pathologically diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI chemotherapy after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy between September 2005 and February 2012 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. The response to chemotherapy was assessed every 3 cycles by World Health Organization criteria and long term survival was analyzed. The toxicities were evaluated for every course of chemotherapy according to National Cancer Institution (NCI) toxicity criteria version 3.0.

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 57 years. Median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 7.8 and 5 months, respectively. The number of patients showing complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease were 0 (0.0%), 9 (17.3%), 30 (57.7%), and 13 (25.0%), respectively. The overall response rate was 17.3%. During a total of 345 cycles, anemia worse than NCI toxicity grade 3 occurred in 2.9%, leukopenia in 20.3%, neutropenia in 12.2%, and thrombocytopenia in 1.5%. Patients with less organ involvement by metastasis, less than 34 U/mL of CA 19-9 and good responsiveness to third cycle of second line chemotherapy were associated with longer OS and TTP.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRI chemotherapy has a modest efficacy with acceptable toxicities in patients with advanced gastric cancer as a second-line treatment. Further well-controlled studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy of FOLFIRI chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced stomach cancer.

The Predictive and Prognostic Value of Early Metabolic Response Assessed by Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of early metabolic change assessed by PET in predicting clinical response to chemotherapy and investigate its prognostic value in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 64 patients with advanced gastric cancer were prospectively enrolled and examined by PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and (18)F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT) at baseline and 14 days after treatment initiation. PET findings were analyzed for the correlation with best clinical response of patients, disease control status, and survival after identifying the threshold of metabolic change percentage by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

For FDG-PET, the total uptake value reduction percentage (δ-SUV) of 40% was the cut-off point with the maximum of sensitivity (70%) and specificity (83%) to predict clinical responding and that of prediction for disease control status was 30%, with the highest sensitivity (58%) and specificity (100%). The δ-SUV of FLT-PET played no predictive role for clinical response (AUC = 0.62; P= 0.134) and disease control (AUC = 0.66; P= 0.157). The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed no significant prognostic impact. FDG uptake reduction in liver metastases could predict both clinical response (P= 0.010) and disease control status (P= 0.002) at thresholds of 35% and 15%, respectively. Those with greater FDG uptake reduction in liver lesions had a longer overall survival (P= 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Early metabolic change in FDG-PET might be a predictive marker for response and disease control in advanced gastric cancer. Early FDG uptake change in liver metastases might be a useful prognostic factor and needs further exploration.

Second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: Current options and future directions

Gastric cancer remains one among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths, regardless of its decreasing incidence and newly available treatment options. Most patients present at an advanced stage and are treated with upfront systemic chemotherapy. Those patients receiving first-line therapy may initially respond to treatment, but many of them relapse over time. In such condition, second-line treatment for disease progression remains the only available option. Although there exists no standard approach in the second-line setting, several phase III trials have shown modest survival benefit in patients receiving irinotecan, taxane and ramucirumab over the best supportive care or active agents. This review analyzes the currently available treatment regimens and future directions of research in the second-line setting for metastatic gastric cancer with the best available evidence. Additionally, the prognostic factors that influence patient survival in those receiving second-line therapy are discussed.

The efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan with leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens

There is no established standard salvage chemotherapy in the second-line setting for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) pre-treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan with leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion with 5-fluorouracil) as a salvage chemotherapy regimen in patients with AGC. Medical records of 97 patients with AGC who received second-line FOLFIRI regimen between March 2006 and February 2011 were examined. Complete and partial responses were observed in 3 (3.1%) and 23 (23.7%) patients, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.4-4.6) and the median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.8-12.2). The most common observed grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (23.7%), diarrhea (6.2%), and stomatitis (5.2%). FOLFIRI regimen is safe and effective in the second-line treatment of AGC patients pre-treated with cisplatin and taxanes.

A randomized phase II study of biweekly irinotecan monotherapy or a combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (mFOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to or progressive after first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) monotherapy and CPT-11 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) combination (mFOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

A total of 59 patients were randomly assigned to either CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2) iv on day 1) or mFOLFIRI (CPT-11 150 mg/m(2) plus LV 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2) over 48 h), every 2 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Following random assignment, 29 patients received CPT-11 and 30 patients mFOLFIRI. The ORR was 17.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.4-30.9] and 20.0 % (95 % CI 5.6-34.3) for the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively (P = 0.525). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival: 2.2 months (95 % CI 0.2-4.3) for CPT-11 versus 3.0 months (95 % CI 2.0-3.7) for mFOLFIRI (P = 0.481) or in median overall survival: 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.0-8.7), compared with 6.7 months (95 % CI 5.3-8.2) (P = 0.514). Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 21 and 28 events in the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study had a small sample size and limited statistical power, CPT-11 monotherapy and mFOLFIRI appear to be equally active and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of 5-FU/LV to CPT-11 did not significantly improve efficacy.

Second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Korea

Stomach cancer is still one of the most prevalent malignancies and is the main cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The outcome for patients with metastasis, as well as for those with tumor recurrence, is dismal, with median survival time not greater than a year. Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic lesions have been treated with systemic chemotherapy, and several randomized studies have demonstrated the benefit of chemotherapy compared with best supportive care. Recently, randomized phase III trials have presented a benefit of second-line chemotherapy compared with supportive care alone. However, it is not known at present which drug is the most effective in this setting. In Korea, the practice of offering second-line treatment to patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is common, and many prospective clinical trials investigating clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy have been reported. Therefore, to define the potential role of second-line chemotherapy and to help to select an effective regimen, we review the published Korean prospective data concerning the use of chemotherapy in the second-line setting for the treatment of AGC. No phase III trials but 20 phase II trials were identified. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy in AGC has indirect evidence considering prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) and improvement of the response rate. Taxanes, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin have been studied much and might be promising drugs considering cross-resistance to a 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin combination (FP). A large, prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III study is warranted to select the most effective second-line chemotherapeutic agents.

Evolving standards of care in advanced gastric cancer

Despite its decreasing incidence in western countries, the care of gastric cancer remains a concern, as many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Whereas localized gastric cancer has benefited from advances in surgical management and perioperative chemotherapy, patients with unresectable or metastatic disease have a poor prognosis. However, advances in chemotherapy have still arisen, with the onset of more convenient and active schedules of treatment, but no significant breakthrough has been achieved in terms of survival. Recent trials in advanced gastric cancer have been focusing on targeted therapies. This article aims to focus on the current state of the art in terms of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, as well as to describe and explain the rationale and hopes for newer therapies that are currently under investigation.

Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

BACKGROUND

The value of second-line therapy for metastatic gastric cancer is unclear. So far there are no randomised phase III data comparing second-line chemotherapy to best supportive care (BSC). In this prospective, multicenter, open label, randomised phase III study we compared irinotecan to BSC to evaluate the impact on survival of second-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients (pts) had metastatic or locally advanced gastro-oesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma, objective tumour progression during or within 6months after first-line chemotherapy and ECOG performance status 0-2. Stratification for time of progression after first-line therapy, ECOG PS and pretreatment secured even distribution of important prognostic factors.

TREATMENT

Arm A: Irinotecan 250mg/m(2)q3w (first cycle) to be increased to 350mg/m(2), depending on toxicity. Arm B: BSC.

FINDINGS

Between 10/2002 and 12/2006 40 pts were randomised. The study was closed prematurely due to poor accrual. Responsefor arm A (19 pts evaluable): No objective responses, SD 53%, PD 47%. Improvement of tumour related symptoms: Arm A 50% of pts, arm B 7%. Overall Survival: (all events in 40 pts have occurred): The hazard ratio for death was reduced to 0.48 (95%CI 0.25-0.92) in the irinotecan-arm (p=0.012). Median survival arm A: 4.0months (95% CI 3.6-7.5), arm B: 2.4months (95% CI 1.7-4.9).

INTERPRETATION

Irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy significantly prolongs overall survival compared to BSC in the studied pts. Second-line chemotherapy can now be considered as a proven treatment option for metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer.

FUNDING

The study was supported by a research grant from Aventis and Pfizer.

A phase II study of biweekly mitomycin C and irinotecan combination therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0109-DI Trial)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have shown that mitomycin C (MMC) acts synergistically with irinotecan (CPT-11). In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had evidence of tumor progression despite prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens or had relapsed within 6 months after completion of therapy with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines. Treatment consisted of MMC (5 mg/m(2)) and CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2)) administered i.v. every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). Our hypothesis was that this combination therapy was efficacious when the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the RR exceeded 20% of the threshold RR.

RESULTS

Between April 2002 and July 2003, 45 eligible patients were registered and analyzed. Among the 45 patients, 40 (89%) had previously received chemotherapy for metastasis and 24 (53%) had a performance status (PS) of 0. Thirteen partial responses were obtained among the 45 patients, resulting in an overall RR of 29% (95% CI, 16-42%). The median time to progression was 4.1 months, and the median survival time was 10 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 29% of the patients, whereas febrile neutropenia occurred in 9%. The incidence rates of grade 3 nausea and diarrhea were 13 and 2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study did not achieve the per-protocol definition of activity, the progression-free survival and overall survival appeared to be promising, with acceptable tolerability. Thus, MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer presents a potential treatment option in patients with a good PS.

Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in relapsed or metastatic gastric cancer: Lessons from clinical practice

Aims and background

Soon after the approval of irinotecan for second-line therapy of advanced gastric cancer, the FOLFIRI regimen represented a possible treatment choice in clinical practice. However, there was still scarce data on the efficacy of irinotecan in this setting. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of FOLFIRI as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer patients progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients with metastatic gastric cancer progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy who received FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy were included in our analysis.

Results

Thirty patients were consecutively treated (20 males and 10 females). Median age was 62 years (range, 36–78). All patients had metastatic disease. In 17 cases (56.6%), peritoneal tumor diffusion was present. Six patients (20%) had previously received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range, 1–12). Partial remission was obtained in 1 case (3%) and stable disease in 8 patients (27%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.7 months and 5.5 months, respectively. The most common toxicities (grade 2–3) observed were neutropenia (13.3%), diarrhea (10%) and vomiting (30%). Ten patients (10%) received 3 or less courses of chemotherapy. In these cases, treatment was stopped before scheduled for accelerated worsening of clinical conditions.

Conclusions

FOLFIRI resulted scarcely active in metastatic gastric cancer patients pre-treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In this setting, the real benefit of a second-line chemotherapy with the FOLFIRI regimen should be carefully re-considered, especially according to the clinical condition of the patient and possible treatment-related side effects.

A phase II study of irinotecan, continuous 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) combination chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen

OBJECTIVES

A phase II study was carried out to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) for the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurring gastric cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those who had metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen or had disease recurrence within 6 months of completing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. Participants received irinotecan (150 mg/m² on day 1) and leucovorin (LV; 20 mg/m² on days 1-2) followed by continuous infusion of 5-FU (1500 mg/m² on days 1-2), every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Between April 2006 and March 2008, 33 patients were enrolled in the study. FOLFIRI served as a second-line treatment in 27 patients, third-line treatment in 4 patients, and fourth-line treatment in 2 patients. The patients had a median age of 60 years (range, 40-75) and underwent 132 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-15) per patient. The response rate was 18.2%, and the disease control rate was 36%. Median overall survival was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.74-6.45), and median time to progression was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.81-2.78). The major grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (45.4%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV is feasible in gastric cancer patients previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Docetaxel/cisplatin followed by FOLFIRI versus the reverse sequence in metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Both docetaxel-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated as active combination regimen in either first-line or second-line setting for metastatic gastric cancer. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the two active regimens, docetaxel/cisplatin and FOLFIRI, as first- and second-line chemotherapy and to compare the sequence of the two regimens in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment arms: Arm A-DP (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) D1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) D1 repeated every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity as the first-line treatment which was followed by FOLFIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) D1, leucovorin 100 mg/m(2) D1, 5-fluorouracil 3,000 mg/m(2) D1-2 for 48 h every 2 weeks) upon disease progression as second-line chemotherapy; Arm B-FOLFIRI as the first-line treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity then followed by DP as the second-line treatment upon documented disease progression.

RESULTS

Between April 2005 and Aug 2008, 58 patients were enrolled (Arm A, n = 28; Arm B, n = 30). Median follow-up was 38.2 months. The overall response rate (ORR) of the first-line chemotherapy was 25.0% with DP (Arm A1) and 13.3 with FOLFIRI (Arm B1) (P = 0.322). The tumor control rate (TCR) of first-line chemotherapy was 82.1% with DP and 66.7% with FOLFIRI (P = 0.209). The median first progression-free survival (1st PFS) was 4.3 months with DP and 3.4 months with FOLFIRI (P = 0.547). The overall response rate of second-line chemotherapy was 20.0% with FOLFIRI (Arm A2) and 27.2% with DP (Arm B2) (P = 0.296). The tumor control rate of second-line chemotherapy was 46.7% with FOLFIRI and 50.0% with DP. The median second progression-free survival (2nd PFS) was 8.1 months with Arm A and 6.7 months with Arm B (P = 0.865). The median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 8.17-16.83) in Arm A and 13.4 months (95% CI 9.99-16.81) in Arm B (P = 0.674). In safety profile, the incidence of neutropenic fever was comparable among the 4 arms ranging from 0 to 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The ORR, TCR of Arm A (DP → FOLFIRI) were not different from those of Arm B (FOLFIRI → DP). There was no statistically significant difference in 1st PFS, 2nd PFS, and OS of both arms. Although the trial was terminated early due to poor patient accrual, we found that both DP and FOLFIRI regimens were tolerable with comparable efficacies regardless of the sequence administered.

Outcomes of multiple salvage chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design

PURPOSE

We analyzed the natural history of advanced gastric cancer with sequential salvage chemotherapy following first-line treatment.

METHODS

We studied 532 patients with unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma who were treated at Yonsei Cancer Center (2000-2008). The patients were managed with multiple sequential salvage chemotherapy as allowed by performance status and toxicity profiles. The tumor response was assessed every two cycles.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty patients received palliative chemotherapy and 72 received supportive care only. The median overall survival was 12.0 months for all patients, 12.1 months for the chemotherapy group, and 2.5 months for the supportive care group (P < 0.001). In the chemotherapy group, 87% received first-line chemotherapy, 47% second-line, 23% third-line, 9% fourth-line, and 3% fifth-line. Response rates were 24.8, 12.6, 10.9, 2.6, and 0% and disease control rates were 76.3, 60.1, 54.2, 54.2, and 53.3% for first- to fifth-line treatment, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.5, 3.4, 2.5, 1.9, and 2.0 months and overall survival was 12.1, 7.9, 5.5, 5.0, and 6.8 months. Performance status and metastatic pattern were consistent prognostic factors throughout salvage treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials may be feasible in second- or third-line salvage chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Future clinical trials in these settings should take into account the low response rate, short progression-free survival, and the prognostic factors for optimal trial design.

Phase I study of intraperitoneal irinotecan in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal seeding

PURPOSE

The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and preliminary efficacy of intraperitoneally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with surgical biopsy proven peritoneal seeding were enrolled at the time of surgery. Prior to IP chemotherapy, patients underwent palliative gastrectomy and CAPD catheter insertion in which CPT-11 was administered on postoperative day 1. The IP CPT-11 was initiated at 50 mg/m(2), which was escalated to 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m(2). IP CPT-11 chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients received a total of 56 cycles at five different CPT-11 dose levels. The DLTs were neutropenic fever, neutropenia, and diarrhea. At the dose level 2 (100 mg/m(2)), there were one DLTs in one of the first cohort of three patients, but no DLTs at the second cohort of this level. At the dose level 5 (250 mg/m(2)), two DLTs were detected in the first two patients; thus, the accrual was stopped resulting in the recommended dose of IP CPT-11 of 200 mg/m(2). Median progression-free survival was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.9,11.2), and median overall survival was 15.6 months (95% CI, 8.4,22.8). Pharmacokinetic results of the study showed that the C (max) of peritoneal SN-38 was achieved earlier than that of plasma SN-38.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 was feasible and tolerable. Further, phase II study of IP CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding is warranted.

Advanced gastric cancer--slow but steady progress

Progress in gastric cancer has been slow, but steady. Historically, patients commonly presented with significant disease related co-morbidity and received treatment of marginal benefit but unfortunately associated with significant toxicity. Today there is no universally accepted reference standard chemotherapy for this disease. However, there is reason for optimism. Meta-analyses of randomized trials have shown a benefit for first-line combination chemotherapy. Current three drug chemotherapy regimens remain toxic, though perhaps less so than previously, and can result in a small but significant survival advantage in carefully chosen patients. Incremental improvements have been observed in both treatment-related toxicity and survival after first-line therapy. More patients are candidates for chemotherapy beyond progression with first-line therapy and response rates with second-line regimens are similar to those seen in other solid tumor malignancies. Although there is no randomized data to support its use second-line treatment should be considered in appropriate patients. Even before the integration of targeted therapies in the treatment of gastric cancer, it was evident that survival for more than 2 years is possible in a subset of patients and large retrospective studies have highlighted clinicopathologic factors associated with improved survival. Presently, with the addition of targeted therapy, especially anti-angiogenic and anti-Her2 therapy, and a better understanding of the biology of the disease, perhaps a sense of optimism should indeed suppress the nihilism commonly associated with this disease.

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in paclitaxel- and cisplatin-refractory gastric cancer

PURPOSE

S-1 is a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed to mimic the effects achieved with protracted continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 salvage chemotherapy in patients with paclitaxel- and cisplatin-refractory gastric cancer. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points were overall survival, safety, and clinical benefit.

METHODS

Patients were eligible for the study if they had histologically documented gastric adenocarcinoma previously treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin, age > or = 18 years, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status < or =2, adequate organ function, and no evidence of gastrointestinal obstruction or passage disturbance. Patients were treated with a dose of S-1 based on body surface area (BSA) as follows: BSA < 1.25 m(2), 80 mg/day; 1.25 < or = BSA < 1.5 m(2), 100 mg/day; BSA > or= 1.5 m(2), 120 mg/day. The total dose was divided in two and administered twice daily for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients enrolled in this study, 49 were evaluable. A total of 190 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and the median number of cycles was 2. Five patients (9.4%) had a partial response, and 18 (34%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.9 and 10.4 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia in six patients (11%) but no cases of febrile neutropenia were found. Most of the non-hematological toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and mucositis, but none reached grade 3 or grade 4 in severity. Improvement of pain was observed in 17 patients (32.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 monotherapy provides active and safe salvage chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer who have been previously treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin.

Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study

BACKGROUND

This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Median age was 62 years (range 26-76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3-7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.

A phase II trial evaluating capecitabine and irinotecan as second line treatment in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer who have progressed on, or within 3 months of platinum-based chemotherapy

RATIONALE

There is no standard second line therapy for relapsed oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer.

METHODS

We recruited 29 eligible patients with relapsed O-G cancer who had progressed during or within 3 months of prior chemotherapy to assess the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine [2,000 mg/(m(2) day) on days 1-14] and irinotecan (250 mg/m(2)) given every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Five patients (17%) demonstrated objective response, while a further seven patients (24%) achieved disease stabilisation. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.1 months (95% CI = 2.2-4.1 months) and 6.5 months (95%CI = 6-7.1 months), respectively. Among symptomatic patients, palliation of tumour-related symptoms included resolution of reflux (5/12 pts), dysphagia (3/9 pts) and weight loss (4/9 pts), improvements in anorexia (4/10 pts), nausea (3/4 pts), vomiting (4/6 pts) and pain (4/16 pts). Grade 3-4 toxicities were diarrhoea (15%), nausea and vomiting (7%), lethargy (31%), neutropenia (31%), anemia (14%) and thrombocytopenia (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine and irinotecan has anti-tumour activity as second line treatment for relapsed O-G cancer, and provides an important improvement in disease related symptoms.

Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

We analysed the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy as second-line treatment for metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer (MRGC) in a clinical practice setting. Factors to select patients who may benefit from salvage chemotherapy was also analysed.

METHODS

Patients with MRGC with progression on or within 6 months after discontinuing platinum-based chemotherapy received FOLFIRI as second-line therapy. The FOLFIRI regimen consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m(2); day 1) combined with leucovorin (200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) as a bolus and 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received a total of 282 courses of chemotherapy. No patients had complete remission (CR), but 9 patients achieved partial remission (PR). Stable disease (SD) was documented in 15 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.2 and 9.1 months, respectively. Toxicities were tolerable and grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 49 cycles (17%). In multivariate analysis, patients with less organ involvement by metastasis and good performance status (PS) were independently associated with a longer PFS and OS (P < 0.05). Disease control (CR, PR or SD) after first-line chemotherapy were related to a longer PFS (P = 0.02), but had no effect on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRI was tolerable and showed modest activity as a second-line therapy in MRGC. Less organ involvement by metastasis or good PS may be optimal selection criteria for patients with MRGC who are suitable for second-line chemotherapy.

Salvage chemotherapy with biweekly irinotecan, plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively assessed the combination of biweekly irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) previously treated with fluoropyrimidine (F), platinum (P), and taxane (T).

METHODS

Between October 2003 and February 2006, all 131 patients with AGC were treated with irinotecan (150 mg/m(2) on day 1), along with either FOLFIRI-1 (ie, LV (20 mg/m(2) bolus) before 5-FU (1000 mg/m(2) continuous infusion over 6-hour) on days 1-2), or FOLFIRI-2 (ie, LV (20 mg/m(2) bolus) before 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) bolus) followed by 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) on days 1-2), or FOLFIRI-3 (ie, 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) bolus) followed by 46-hour continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m(2) 5-FU and 100 mg/m(2) LV). Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 52 years (range, 19-70 years). Patients received a median of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (range, 1-21 cycles). Of the 97 patients with measurable disease, 1 (1.0%) achieved a complete response, and 11 (11.3%) achieved partial responses, making the overall response rate 12.3%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9-2.6 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6-6.9 months). Good performance status (P = 0.046), fewer metastatic sites (P < 0.001), and longer time to progression of previous chemotherapy (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. OS was longer with the FOLFIRI-1 regimen but not with statistical significance (P = 0.064). The treatments were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In actual clinical practice, biweekly irinotecan with 5-FU and LV had modest activity and tolerability in AGC patients previously treated with F, P, and T.

Treatment outcomes of oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin as salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

We performed a single-institution retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated were eligible for the study. Patients received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and LV 100 mg/m(2) (2-h intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU 2,400 mg/m(2) (46-h continuous infusion) every 2 weeks, and responses were assessed after every three cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine out of 62 patients were assessable for response. Among them, 46 patients had previously been treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. Patients had a median age of 57 years (range 32-76 years), 72.6% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Total 296 courses of chemotherapy were administered as second-line (67.7%) or third-line (27.4%), and the median courses per patient was three cycles. Out of 59 evaluable patients, 14 partial responses were observed (overall response rate, 22.6%). Stable disease was observed in 22 patients (35.5%), and progressive disease in 23 patients (37.1%). The median response duration, time to progression, and overall survival were 2.3, 3.0, and 8.0 months, respectively. The major toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis, and peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in nine patients (14.5%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (1.6%). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included mucositis in one patient (1.6%) and vomiting in two patients (3.2%). Grade 1 or 2 peripheral neuropathy were observed in 18 patients (29.0%), however there were no cases of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin, 5-FU and LV was effective and safe salvage chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.

A Phase II study of cetuximab (Erbitux) plus FOLFIRI for irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI for irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory colorectal cancers. From September 2004 to February 2006, 31 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] over 2 hr on day 1 followed by weekly 1-hr infusions of 250 mg/m(2)) plus bi-weekly FOLFIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min, and leucovorin 100 mg/m(2) IV over 2 hr, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) IV bolus on day 1, and followed by 5-FU 2,400 mg/m(2) by continuous IV over 46 hrs). Patients received a median of four cycles (range: 1-23). Eight (25.8%) patients had confirmed partial responses and 10 (32.2%) had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months for surviving patients, the median time to progression was 2.9 months, the median duration of response was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 10.9 months. Skin toxicity was observed in 25 patients (80.4%) including grade 3 in 6 patients (19.4%). Other common non-hematologic toxicities of all grades were mucositis (32.3%), asthenia (22.6%), diarrhea (12.9%), and paronychial cracking (12.9%). The combination of cetuximab with FOLFIRI was effective and tolerable in colorectal cancer patients heavily pretreated with a number of chemotherapy regimens.

Irinotecan With 5-FU/FA in Advanced Biliary Tract Adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVES

Biliary cancer has a poor prognosis and lacks a standard palliative chemotherapy. The purpose of this prospective single-arm phase II study was to determine the activity and tolerability of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid in advanced biliary cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC) and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Irinotecan 80 mg/m2, followed by folinic acid 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2000 mg/m2 infused over 24 hours (Fufiri) were administered weekly 6 times, every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with ICC and 13 patients with GBC were enrolled. All patients were evaluable for safety. WHO grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 8 patients (27%), consisting of diarrhea and leukopenia in 5 and 3 patients, respectively. One patient with diarrhea grade 4 finally succumbed to sepsis. Objective response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-26.5%), with an additional 10% of patients showing stable disease. Median overall survival was 166 days and 273 days, and median progression-free survival was 84 days and 159 days for ICC and GBC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fufiri is a well-tolerated regimen in patients with ICC and GBC but has only modest activity in advanced biliary tract cancer.

A phase II study of docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer after failure of fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Fluoropyrimidine (F) and platinum (P) combination chemotherapy has been widely used as a first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Docetaxel has shown promising activity against this disease. In this study, we explored the efficacy and safety of docetaxel monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy in AGC after F and P combination chemotherapy failed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2004 to October 2005, 49 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. The median treatment-free interval was 28.0 days, and 81.6% of patients had suffered cancer progression within 4 months after the withdrawal of first-line chemotherapy. Docetaxel was given IV at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, together with dexamethasone prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 182 cycles of docetaxel were administered with a median of 3 (range 1-9) cycles. From an intention-to-treat analysis, eight patients achieved objective response with a response rate of 16.3% (95% CI, 6.0-26.6). The median response duration was 4.7 months. A total of 20 patients showed stable disease, but 17 patients suffered disease progression. At a median follow-up duration of 11.3 months for surviving patients (range 6.3-18.8 months), the median time to disease progression was 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.3-2.7) and the median overall survival time since the start of docetaxel monotherapy was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-9.8). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 18.4% of patients and in 5.4% of cycles. The incidence of non-hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or worse was asthenia 32.7%, diarrhea 10.2% and peripheral sensory neuropathy 8.2%.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) is active against AGC as second-line chemotherapy after prior exposure to F and P combination chemotherapy. The toxicity profile is moderate.

Mitomycin C plus Infusional 5-Fluorouracil in Platinum-Refractory Gastric Adenocarcinoma: An Extended Multicenter Phase II Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the toxicity and activity of bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with a 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in gastric cancer patients who had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with MMC (10 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 22, 5-FU (2.6 g/m(2)) as a 24-hour infusion, and folinic acid 500 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with gastric cancer, 16 after failure of first-line chemotherapy and 18 after failure of at least two prior chemotherapies, were included. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 9 (26.5%) of the 34 patients had a partial response and 10 (29.4%) a disease stabilization (disease control rate 56%). The median time to progression was 3.3 months (CI95: 2.8-3.7), and the median overall survival was 7.2 months (CI95: 5.9-8.4). Grade III/IV thrombocytopenia occurred in 14.7% of patients (n = 5), while the most frequent nonhematological grade III/IV toxicities were mucositis and diarrhea, each affecting 9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

As the tested regimen was generally safe and well tolerated by the patients, MMC plus infusional 5-FU/folinic acid may be a potential second-line regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Capecitabine and doxorubicin combination chemotherapy as salvage therapy in pretreated advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and the safety of a combination regimen of capecitabine and doxorubicin as salvage chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients who had undergone one or two prior chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

Patients received capecitabine, 2,500 mg/m(2)/day PO for 14 days (D1-14) and doxorubicin, 30 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. The response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria, and the toxicity was evaluated by NCI-CTC (version 2.0).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty-six patients were treated as second-line chemotherapy and the remaining patients as third-line chemotherapy. A total of 152 cycles of chemotherapy (median 2, range 1-12) were administered. Median dose intensities of capecitabine and doxorubicin were 11,326 and 9.6 mg/m(2)/week, respectively. The overall response rate was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.1-12.5%) and the disease control rate was 46.7% (95% CI, 28.6-87.1%) according to an intent-to-treat analysis. The median progression-free survival was 11.3 weeks (95% CI, 5.6-16.7 weeks). The median overall survival was 29.1 weeks (95% CI, 18.3-39.9 weeks) with one-year survival rate of 24%. Severe (grade III/IV) hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon and included nausea/vomiting in five (11.1%), neutropenia in two (4.4%), anemia in one (2.2%), and hand-foot syndrome in one patient (2.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of capecitabine and doxorubicin is a feasible salvage regimen in advanced pre-treated gastric cancer.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in pretreated patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) is an active regimen for metastatic gastric cancer in the first-line setting. The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify its efficacy and safety in patients with prior chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients in the study fulfilled the following selection criteria: (1) histologically proven gastric cancer with metastatic lesions; (2) performance status of 2 or less; (3) age of 75 years or younger; (4) at least one prior chemotherapy regimen without CPT-11 or CDDP; (5) adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function; (6) normal cardiac function; (7) no other severe medical conditions; (8) no other active malignancy; and (9) the provision of written informed consent. The treatment consisted of CPT-11 (70 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 15 and CDDP (80 mg/m2) on day 1; repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were recruited, and 28 were assessable for clinical response. There were eight partial responses, resulting in a response rate of 28%. Median time to progression was 104 days (range, 24-863 days) and median overall survival time was 283 days from the initiation of this therapy. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 or higher infection, and diarrhea were 69%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. Other adverse reactions were mild. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

A combination of CPT-11 and CDDP may be active and feasible for gastric cancer patients with prior chemotherapy. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify this regimen's significance in the second-line setting.

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This nonrandomized open label phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven, metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, aged 18-70 years, performance status zero to two, no prior chemotherapy, and with signed written informed consent were eligible. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 150 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 100 mg/m2 day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous infusion starting on day 1, which was repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

From August 2004 to August 2005, 48 patients were prospectively enrolled. The median age was 54 years (24-69). In total, 386 cycles were administered with a median of nine cycles per patient (range 1-12 cycles) and 45 of 48 patients were assessable for treatment response. An independent review of tumor responses resulted in overall response rate of 66.7% (95% confidence interval=53.4% to 80.0%) by intent-to-treat analysis with one complete response and 31 partial responses. The median survival of all patients was 14.8 months and the median time to progression was 9.6 months. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (12% of all cycles) and emesis (8% of all cycles). Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in five patients. One (2%) patient had severe tumor bleeding and five (10%) patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified FOLFOXIRI combination chemotherapy showed a very promising preliminary antitumor activity and was generally well tolerated as a first-line treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

A pilot study of cisplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Irinotecan, in combination with leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (FU) or with cisplatin, is known to be active for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This pilot study evaluated a novel three-drug combination of irinotecan, leucovorin/FU and cisplatin as a first-line treatment of AGC. The primary endpoint was to assess the feasibility in anticipation of conducting a larger phase II study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive AGC patients received irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) on day 1, and leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) and a 22-h infusion of FU 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2. Cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) was administered on day 2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 17 eligible patients, two patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 and their median age was 48 years (range: 31 to 69). A total of 117 chemotherapy cycles were delivered (median: 6, range: 1 to 12). The causes of treatment discontinuation were disease progression in 9 patients (53%), refusal (35%) and toxicity (12%). Although grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (41% of patients) was the major toxicity that required dose adjustments, only one episode of febrile neutropenia occurred. Grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue were observed in 35%, 35% and 29% of patients, respectively. None of the patients died of toxicity during treatment. Of the 16 patients who were evaluable for response, 7 (44%) experienced a partial response.

CONCLUSION

This novel multi-drug combination was tolerated well in patients with AGC. Based on the encouraging efficacy and tolerability, a randomized phase II study is ongoing in this disease setting.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

A phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with gastric cancer recurring after or progressing during 5-FU/platinum treatment

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is a combination chemotherapy regimen that is active against untreated advanced gastric cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of DP treatment in patients with recurring or metastatic gastric cancer who had been previously treated with other chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The DP regimen consisted of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v.) over 1 h on Day 1 every 4 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (28 men, 9 women; median age, 53 years; range 28-71 years) received a total of 128 cycles of therapy (median, 3; range 1-9). Twenty-six patients had recurrent disease and 11 had metastatic tumors. The objective response rate was 32.4% (95% confidence interval = 16.6-48.3%), including 1 complete response and 11 partial responses. Eleven had stable disease, whereas 12 had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 70.5 days (range 30-392 days). Grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (10.8%), leukopenia (27.0%), neutropenia (51.4%), thrombocytopenia (2.7%), nausea/vomiting (5.4%) and oral mucositis (13.5%). Median time to progression was 136 days and median overall survival was 235 days.

CONCLUSION

The DP combination was well tolerated and effective for patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated previously with 5-fluorouracil/platinum chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety study of docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer failing fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Fluoropyrimidine (F) and platinum (P) combination chemotherapy has been widely used for the first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Docetaxel (D) has shown promising activity in this disease. The present study retrospectively investigated the efficacy of D monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy for AGC that is failing F and P combination chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 34 patients, fitting the eligibility criteria, were included in this study. D was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) IV every 3 weeks, with dexamethasone prophylaxis. Twenty-nine patients had measurable lesions. The median treatment-free interval was 38.5 days, and 91.2% of patients had progressed within 4 months of withdrawal of the first line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 133 cycles of D were administered, with a median of 3.5 (1 approximately 8) cycles. From an intention-to-treat analysis, 6 patients achieved partial responses (PR), with a response rate of 20.7% (95% CI, 6.0~35.4). The duration of objective PRs in these six were 2.3+, 2.5+, 2.9, 3.0+, 6.2 and 6.8 months, respectively. Six patients showed a stable disease, but 15 showed progression. The median time to progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.8 approximately 5.5), with a median overall survival since the start of D monotherapy of 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 approximately 11.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 12.9% of patients and 3.1% of cycles. The incidence of grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicities were as follows; peripheral sensory neuropathy 9.7%, asthenia 3.2% and allergic reaction 2.7%.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2), is active in AGC as second-line chemotherapy after failure of prior exposure to the F and P combination chemotherapy, with a favorable toxicity profile.