Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with paclitaxel in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer

Phase I study of adjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 for stage III Lauren's diffuse-type gastric cancer after D2 resection (NORDICA study)

PURPOSE

The prognosis of diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) is poorer than that of intestinal type, but S-1 is a potential treatment option in DGC. This study explored the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose for phase II study (RP2D) of nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS regimen) as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III DGC.

METHODS

Patients with stage III DGC were recruited into this phase I dose-escalation study between July 2019 and June 2020 in Zhongshan Hospital. Nab-paclitaxel and S-1 (80-120 mg/day, d1-14, q3w) were administrated for 6 cycles, and then 8 cycles of S-1 monotherapy were applied. The patients received nab-paclitaxel at 180, 220, or 260 mg/m² according to the 3 + 3 design based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The primary endpoint was RP2D. Secondary endpoints were the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

One case experienced DLT in 180-mg/m² dose group, subsequently three additional subjects were enrolled. DLT was not observed in the 220- and 260-mg/m² dose groups (both n = 3). Therefore, the MTD has not reached, and the RP2D of nab-paclitaxel would be 260 mg/m² . Five participants showed progressive disease, with three and two participants in the 180- and 220-mg/m² dose groups, respectively. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month DFS rates were 100%, 63.6%, and 50.9%, respectively. The most frequently observed AEs were neutropenia (83.3%) and leukopenia (66.7%).

CONCLUSION

The RP2D of nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in DGC was 260 mg/m² . The AS regimen had a tolerable AE profile in stage III DGC.

Efficacy of Paclitaxel plus TS1 against previously treated EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Later line chemotherapy (≥2nd lines) such as Docetaxel or immunotherapy is frequently used. As the life expectancy of lung cancer patients is getting longer, we need to provide more treatment options. Other treatment options are not well documented except for Doxetaxel and immunotherapy. Therefore, the efficacy of paclitaxel plus TS1 (TTS1) is warranted.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated between 2010 and 2013. Clinical characteristics, type of tumor, EGFR mutation status, and treatment response to first-line EGFR-TKI therapy and efficacy of TTS1, were collected.

Results

Twenty eight patients were enrolled in this study. No patients archived complete response and seven patients had partial response (ORR: 25%). The disease control rate was 60.7% (17/28). The progression free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months and overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months. Of them, 17 had EGFR mutations, eight EGFR wild type, and three were unknown EGFR status. After TTS1 treatment, patients with EGFR mutations had better PFS (4.9 months vs. 1.8 months) and OS (15.5 months vs. 7.2 months) compared with those of EGFR wild type.

Conclusions

TTS1 are effective later line chemotherapy, especially in tumor EGFR mutated patients. Paclitaxel plus TS1 is another treatment of choice for NSCLC patients before a more effective treatment strategy is found.

Phase II Study of S-1 and Paclitaxel Combination Therapy in Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lessons Learned.

In terms of efficacy and safety, good results were obtained with S‐1 and paclitaxel (PTX) combination therapy.

The findings suggest that S‐1 and PTX combination therapy is a feasible treatment option in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer.

Background.

Although monotherapy with cytotoxic agents, including docetaxel and pemetrexed, is recommended for patients with previously treated advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its outcomes are unsatisfactory. S‐1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine agent that consists of tegafur, 5‐ chloro‐2, 4‐dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate. S‐1 is approved for patients with gastric cancer in 7 Asian countries and 15 European countries. It is also approved for patients with eight type of cancers, including NSCLC, in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of S‐1 and paclitaxel (PTX) combination therapy in patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods.

Oral S‐1 was administered thrice weekly on days 1–14 at 80, 100, and 120 mg/day in patients with body surface areas of <1.25, 1.25–1.5, and >1.5 m², respectively. PTX was administered at 80 mg/m² on days 1 and 8. Primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results.

Forty patients were enrolled, with response and disease control rates of 27.5% and 75.0%, respectively (Fig. 1). Median PFS and OS were 6.5 and 20.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were seen in five (12%) and one (2%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (7%). Common grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities were stomatitis (5% of patients), diarrhea (7% of patients), and interstitial lung disease (one patient). No treatment‐related deaths were observed.

Conclusion.

This S‐1 and PTX cotherapy dose and schedule showed satisfactory efficacy, with mild toxicities, in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of S-1 and Paclitaxel Combination Therapy as a First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lessons Learned.

Coadministration of S‐1 and paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer showed favorable efficacy.

Coadministration of S‐1 and paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced non‐small lung cancer showed tolerable toxicity.

Background.

Although monotherapy with cytotoxic agents including docetaxel or vinorelbine are recommended for elderly patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcome is not satisfactory. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of S‐1 and paclitaxel (PTX) as a first‐line cotreatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods.

Oral S‐1 was administered on days 1–14 every 3 weeks at 80, 100, and 120 mg per day for patients with body surface area < 1.25 m², 1.25–1.5 m², and > 1.5 m², respectively. PTX was administered at 80 mg/m² on days 1 and 8. The primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results.

Seventeen patients were enrolled with response and disease control rates of 47.1% and 88.2%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 5.6 and 35.0 months, respectively. Hematological grade 3 or 4 toxicities included leukopenia (55.8%), neutropenia (52.9%), febrile neutropenia (11.8%), and anemia (11.8%). Nonhematological grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis (23.5%), diarrhea (5.9%), and interstitial lung disease (5.9%), and grade 5 toxicities included interstitial lung disease (5.9%).

Conclusion.

This S‐1 and PTX cotherapy dose and schedule showed satisfactory efficacy with mild toxicities in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase I study of S-1 plus paclitaxel combination therapy as a first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

This phase I study was aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) for oral S-1 plus paclitaxel combination therapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-naïve patients (age, >70 years) with stage III/IV NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel intravenously at four dose levels (DLs), 60, 70, 80, and 90 mg/m², on day 1 and 8, and with S-1 (80 mg/m²) orally on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. MTD was defined as the dose at which two of the initial three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three patients were added when the initial three patients experienced DLTs. The dose administered in three of the six patients with DLTs met the definition of MTD. The RD was defined as a dose 1 DL below the MTD. Fifteen patients including six on DL 1 and three each on DLs 2, 3, and 4 were enrolled. One patient experienced a DLT (febrile neutropenia) at DL 1. The remaining DLTs were noted at DL 4 (in one patient each): febrile neutropenia, grade (G) 3 skin rash, G3 diarrhea, G3 stomatitis, and G3 international normalized ratio (INR) elevation. The MTD of paclitaxel was 90 mg/m². The RD for both S-1 and paclitaxel was 80 mg/m² (DL 3). The response rate was 45.5% (8 of 15 patients achieved a partial response). In conclusion, the RD of both S-1 and paclitaxel was 80 mg/m² in the combination therapy for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC.

S-1 Based Doublet as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Curatively Resected Stage III Gastric Cancer: Results from the Randomized Phase III POST Trial

Purpose

We conducted a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial to compare S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) with S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Stage III gastric cancer patients who had received curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomized into equal groups to receive adjuvant chemotherapy of eight cycles of DS (S-1 70 mg/m²/day on days 1-14 plus docetaxel 35 mg/m²on days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or SP (S-1 70 mg/m²/day on days 1-14 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m²on day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate.

Results

Between November 2010 and July 2013, 153 patients (75 patients to DS and 78 patients to SP) were enrolled from 8 institutions in Korea. After the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin was approved based on the CLASSIC study, itwas decided to close the study early. With a median follow-up duration of 56.9 months, the 3-year DFS rate between two groups was not significantly different (49.14% in DS group vs. 52.5% in SP group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (42.7% in DS and 38.5% in SP, p=0.351). SP group had more grade 3-4 anemia (1.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.037), whereas grade 3-4 hand-foot syndrome (4.1% vs. 0%, p=0.025) and mucositis (10.7% vs. 2.6%, p=0.001) were more common in DS group. Fifty-one patients (68%) in DS group and 52 (66.7%) in SP group finished planned treatment.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that SP or DS is an effective and tolerable option for patients with curatively resected stage III gastric cancer.

High STMN1 level is associated with chemo-resistance and poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients

Background:

Stathmin1 (STMN1) is a cytosolic phosphoprotein that regulates cellular microtubule dynamics and is known to have oncogenic activity. Despite several reports, its roles in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear owing to a lack of analyses of highly metastatic cases. This study aimed to investigate STMN1 as a prognostic and predictive indicator of response to paclitaxel therapy in patients with GC, including inoperable cases.

Methods:

Immunohistochemical analysis of STMN1 was performed on both operable (n=95) and inoperable GC (n=61) samples. The roles of STMN1 in cancer cell proliferation and sensitivity to a microtubule-targeting drug, paclitaxel, were confirmed by knockdown experiments using GC cell lines.

Results:

Multivariate and Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated that high STMN1 was predictive of poor prognosis in both the groups. In the operable cohort, STMN1 expression correlated with cancer curability, recurrence, and resistance to adjuvant therapy. A correlation with paclitaxel resistance was observed in inoperable cases. Knockdown of STMN1 in GC cell lines inhibited proliferation and sensitised the cells to paclitaxel by enhancing apoptosis.

Conclusions:

STMN1 is a possible biomarker for paclitaxel sensitivity and poor prognosis in GC and could be a novel therapeutic target in metastatic GC.

A phase I study of S-1 in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In Japan, S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, plus cisplatin is a standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer, whereas nab-paclitaxel is a treatment option. We aimed to evaluate the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical efficacy of S-1 combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer in a phase 1 study.

METHODS

The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of S-1 plus nab-paclitaxel. The study was designed in accordance with a standard 3 + 3 method. Patients received 3-week cycles of treatment. S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days, and nab-paclitaxel was administered as an intravenous infusion at 180, 220, or 260 mg/m² on day 1 or 8.

RESULTS

Among the 16 patients enrolled, dose-limiting toxicity was observed in one patient at level 2a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 220 mg/m² on day 1). The MTD was not obtained, but the RD was established as level 3a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m² on day 1). The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (62.5 %). The overall response rate was 54.5 %. The pharmacokinetic profiles of coadministered S-1 and paclitaxel were comparable to those of nab-paclitaxel or S-1 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present results, the RD was determined as level 3a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m² on day 1). This combination therapy was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan

Among advanced gastric cancer cases, peritoneal dissemination is a life-threatening mode of metastasis, and any strategy to control peritoneal metastasis will significantly improve treatment outcomes. Since intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs can induce an extremely high concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal chemotherapy would appear to be a reasonable and promising strategy to control the peritoneal dissemination. However, it has been reported in the past that intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C or cisplatin resulted in no significant clinical effects against peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. In contrast, intraperitoneal paclitaxel is expected to remain inside the peritoneal cavity due to its large molecular weight and fat solubility, leading to a high concentration of the drug in the peritoneal cavity. In fact, promising results in several phase II clinical trials using intraperitoneal paclitaxel have been reported, including a median survival time of 16.2-24.6 months and a 1-year overall survival rate of 69-78 %. Thereafter, a phase III randomized control study (PHOENIX-GC trial) with intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel in comparison to systemic S-1 plus cisplatin was conducted in Japan. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with systemic capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is currently ongoing in Singapore. In this review, based on clinical experience from Singapore and Japan, the clinical significance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease is discussed.

A phase II study of biweekly S-1 and paclitaxel (SPA) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Paclitaxel and S-1 are both effective antitumor chemotherapeutic agents for advanced gastric cancer. However, the continuous administration of S-1 for 3 weeks or more can result in unacceptable toxicities, particularly hematological toxicities. Therefore, an alternative treatment schedule (1-week administration followed by 1-week rest) is warrant for testing in order to allow continuation of the therapy. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly S-1 and paclitaxel (SPA) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced or relapsed gastric cancer who had measurable lesion(s) were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously at a dose of 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oral S-1 was given twice daily (BSA < 1.25 m(2), 80 mg/day; 1.25 ≤ BSA < 1.50 m(2), 100 mg/day; 1.50 m(2) ≤ BSA, 120 mg/day) on days 1-7 followed by a drug-free interval of 1 week every 14-day cycle.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (M/F = 33/11) were enrolled. A total of 277 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles per patient (range 1-12), and 19 (43.2 %) patients received up to seven cycles. The assessed overall response rate was 38.6 with 38.6 % partial response in 17 patients, 45.4 % stable disease in 20 patients, and 13.6 % progressive disease in six patients. Thirty-four patients (77.3 %) received second-line chemotherapy. The estimated median progression-free survival and median overall survival times were, respectively, 5.2 months (95 % CI 4.08-6.39 months) and 12.2 months (95 % CI 8.81-15.60 months). The major hematological toxicities were included grade 3 leucocytopenia in two patients (4.5 %), grade 3 neutropenia in 14 patients (40.9 %), and grade 4 neutropenia in four patients (9.0 %). Two patients (4.5 %) suffered grade 1 febrile neutropenia. All grade of the non-hematological toxicities, such as nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and diarrhea, held the proportion of 54.5 % (grade 3/4, 4.5 %), 31.8, 95.4, and 18.1 % (grade 3/4, 2.2 %), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly S-1 and paclitaxel (SPA regimen) combination therapy had promising activity with acceptable adverse toxicities. SPA regimen was easily implemented, and more patients received second-line chemotherapy. It deserved to conduct a well-designed randomized phase III study to compare this regimen with S-1-based combination treatment.

Biweekly S-1 plus paclitaxel (SPA) as second-line chemotherapy after failure from fluoropyrimidine and platinum in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

Second-line chemotherapy is now considered a standard therapy option in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who failed from first-line chemotherapy. Single agents, such as irinotecan, docetaxel or paclitaxel, provided an overall response rate of about 10 %. However, the efficacy was not satisfactory. The authors conducted a phase II study to investigate biweekly regimen of S-1 plus paclitaxel in Chinese AGC in second-line setting, with response rate as the primary end point.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with AGC failed from first-line chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/platinum who had measurable lesions were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on day 1 at a dose of 120 mg/m(2), and oral S-1 was administered twice a day from days 1 to 7, followed by a 7-day drug-free interval.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with pretreated AGC were accrued. No complete responses were observed. Partial responses were documented in 10 (33.3 %) patients. Ten (33.3 %) patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.6 months and the overall survival was 7.2 months. The main toxicity was bone marrow suppression. The most frequent grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia, which were observed in 8 (26.7 %) and 6 (20 %) patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity was neuropathy, which was reported in 4 (13.3 %) patients.

CONCLUSION

Biweekly S-1 plus paclitaxel showed promising activity with acceptable toxicities as second-line chemotherapy in pretreated patients with AGC. This regimen deserves further investigation in a phase III trial.

Treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis

Although the treatment of gastric cancer improves the clinical outcomes, the survival of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is still very poor. Effective drugs against peritoneal metastasis, coupled with new therapeutic modalities, are needed to improve the prognoses of these patients. Paclitaxel and TS-1 are candidate drugs for peritoneal metastasis, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy and targeted therapy are potential new therapeutic modalities. Two phase II studies using TS-1 and intraperitoneal and systemic paclitaxel for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis showed respectable survival results. In addition, peritoneal metastatic lesions showed high levels of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (ECAM) and very low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), thus indicating that an anti-ECAM monoclonal antibody, catumaxomab, would be effective against gastric cancer-derived peritoneal metastasis. Although catumaxomab and intraperitoneally administered paclitaxel are not generally used in Japan at present, these treatment strategies might therefore be effectively used in Japan in the near future.

Randomized phase II study comparing paclitaxel with S-1 vs. S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This randomized phase II study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with S-1 (PS) vs. S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Eighty-two (82) patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to oral S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) or S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) plus paclitaxel (on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 4 weeks' cycle). S-1 was orally administered with a fixed quantity according to body surface area (BSA), while paclitaxel was given 60 mg/m(2) i.v. daily through an implanted catheter. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall responsible rates and safety.

RESULTS

The median OS with PS versus S-1 monotherapy was 14.0 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.02), survival at 12 months was 61.0 % in the PS group and 46.3 % in the S-1 group. Median PFS was also significantly longer in the PS group (6.0 months) than in the S-1 group (4.0 months). The overall response rate was determined in 82 evaluable patients, and was significantly higher (P = 0.04) with PS (19 patients, 46.3 %) than with S-1 monotherapy (10 patients, 24.4 %). PS was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths, all were grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including anorexia, nausea, and diarrhea developed in less than 10 % of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel with S-1 is well tolerated and active in AGC patients. Further investigation with comparative trials is needed for confirmation.

Phase II study of single intraperitoneal chemotherapy followed by systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study involving a single administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by sequential systemic chemotherapy with S-1+ paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered intraperitoneally at staging laparoscopy. Within 7 days, patients received systemic chemotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14) plus paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8), followed by 7-days rest. The responders to this chemotherapy underwent second-look laparoscopy, and gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in patients when the disappearance of peritoneal metastasis had been confirmed. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. All patients were confirmed as having localized peritoneal metastasis by staging laparoscopy. Eventually, gastrectomy was performed in 22 patients. The median survival time of the total patient population and those patients in which gastrectomy was performed was 21.3 and 29.8 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 65.7 % for all patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia and leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 was well tolerated in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Programmed chemotherapy for patients with metastatic unresectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic unresectable gastric cancers (MGC) include the development of new antitumor drugs and new regimens for their use. However, the selection of individually designed regimens by gastric cancer (GC) subtype remains problematic. Here, we investigated the clinical usefulness of programmed chemotherapy.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

MGC patients were classified into three groups by clinical condition. We implemented a chemotherapy program consisting of S-1 combination regimens. Median survival time (MST) of level 1 patients was 416 days (95% CI: 313-506 days), with an overall response rate of 47%. MSTs of level 2 and 3 patients were 208 (95% CI: 153-287 days) and 95 days (95% CI: 28-136 days), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 12% and anorexia in 6%. All treatment- related toxicities were resolved, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

This program provided reasonable selection of case-matching regimens and may improve the survival of patients with MGC. Further, it may represent the first clinical tool to provide efficient chemotherapy course selection for MGC. Ongoing analysis of newly developed drugs and regimens will allow the efficacy of this chemotherapy program to be improved.

Phase II multi-institutional prospective randomised trial comparing S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer

Background:

A combination of S-1 and cisplatin has been shown to be effective with acceptable safety for the first-line treatment of far-advanced gastric cancer in Japan. This is the first randomised phase II trial to compare S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in this setting.

Methods:

Patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens: S-1 (40 mg m⁻² twice daily) on days 1–14 plus paclitaxel (60 mg m⁻²) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (S-1+paclitaxel) or S-1 (40 mg m⁻² twice daily) on days 1–21 plus cisplatin (60 mg m⁻²) on day 8 of a 5-week cycle (S-1+cisplatin). The primary end point was the response rate (RR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results:

A total of 83 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses. In the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups, RRs (52.3% vs 48.7% P=0.74) and median PFS (9 vs 6 months; P=0.50) were similar. The median OS was similar in the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups (16 vs 17 months; P=0.84). The incidence of grade 3 or higher haematological toxicity was 19.0% with S-1+paclitaxel and 19.5% with S-1+cisplatin. The incidence of grade 3 or higher non-haematological toxicity was 14.2% with S-1+paclitaxel and 17.1% with S-1+cisplatin.

Conclusion:

S-1+paclitaxel was suggested to be a feasible and effective non-platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Our results should be confirmed in multicenter, phase III-controlled clinical trials.

Targeted therapies for gastric cancer: current status

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common cancers internationally. Unfortunately the majority of patients still present at an advanced stage, and despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, outcomes still remain poor with high mortality rates despite a decline in incidence. Whilst the utility of classical chemotherapy agents has been explored thoroughly (and continues to be investigated, alone or in various combinations), advances have been slow and the efficacy of these agents has reached a plateau. As such, the focus of recent study has shifted toward developing a greater understanding of the molecular biology of carcinogenesis and the cancer cell phenotype, and, in turn, the development of rationally designed drugs that target molecular aberrancies in signal transduction pathways specific to gastric cancer. These targets include circulating growth and angiogenic factors, cell surface receptors, and other molecules that comprise downstream intracellular signalling pathways, including receptor tyrosine kinases. Therapeutic advances in this area significantly lag behind other solid organ malignancies such as breast and colorectal cancer. This article reviews the role of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, including rationale and mechanism of action, current and emerging data, as single-agent therapy or in combination regimens. A recently published randomized phaseIII trial supporting the use of trastuzumab, an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu monoclonal antibody, in a selected population of patients is discussed. Therapies that have been evaluated in phase II trials are also reviewed, as well as promising new therapies currently being investigated in preclinical or phase I studies. There is optimism that targeted therapies, whether as single-agent therapy or in combination with traditional therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, may yet have an impact on improvement of the overall prognosis of gastric cancer.

Phase II study of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel (FLTAX) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

Patients with untreated stage IV GC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour infusion, followed by 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) as a bolus infusion and L-leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. The primary endpoint was response rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range 34-75). Twenty-one patients (60%) had diffuse-type cancer and 11 had peritoneal metastasis. The confirmed response rate was 43% (95% CI 26-61) with 15 partial responses. Stable disease was observed in 16 (46%) patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 months (95% CI 5.8-7.4) and 16.2 months (95% CI 10.0-22.8), respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were: neutropenia (54%), febrile neutropenia (3%), diarrhea (6%) and sensory neuropathy (11%).

CONCLUSION

FLTAX showed a desirable safety profile, and the efficacy against advanced GC was encouraging. FLTAX may be a good option for GC patients with deteriorated general condition, and a randomized clinical trial in such patients is currently underway.

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer patients after curative D2 gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with stage III gastric cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 53 patients with pathological stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day) administration for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks (1 cycle). The treatment was started within 45 days after surgery and repeated for 4 cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) until 1 year after surgery. The feasibility of the 4 cycles of chemotherapy, followed by S-1 administration, was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (79.2%, 95% CI 65.9-82.9) tolerated the planned 4 cycles of treatment with S-1 and docetaxel, and 34 patients (64.2%, 95% CI 49.8-76.9) completed subsequent S-1 monotherapy for 1 year. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 28% and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 9% of the patients, while grade 3 nonhematological toxicities were relatively low.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel therapy is feasible and has only moderate toxicity in stage III gastric cancer patients. We believe that this regimen will be a candidate for future phase III trials seeking the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer patients.

Multicenter phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, plus oral S-1 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1 to 14 followed by 2 weeks off, in a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were registered. All of them had measurable disease and were determined to be eligible for the present study. Two complete responses and 23 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 46.3%. At a final follow up of 3 years, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.0 and 14.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients, and grade 4 in 1 patient (total, 27.8%). The most serious nonhematological toxicity was diarrhea, where grade 3 occurred in 5 patients (9.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

A combination of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation with comparative trials is needed for confirmation.

Pilot study of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel for patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This pilot study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer or positive lavage cytology diagnosed by staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered at 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2) for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week rest, as one course. After five courses of this therapy, the primary gastric tumors were evaluated and second-look laparoscopy was performed for patients showing partial response or stable disease with clinical benefit.

RESULTS

Partial response or stable disease with clinical benefit was confirmed in seven and five patients, respectively, and these patients underwent second-look laparoscopy. No viable cancer cells were detected on cytopathological investigation during second-look laparoscopy in 9 patients who underwent surgical treatment. The intent-to-treat response rate for gastric tumor was 44% and the rate of disappearance of peritoneal metastasis was 38% (6 cases) at surgery. The median survival time was 555 days. Leucopenia of grade 3 and neutropenia of grade 3 were recognized in two and three patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This chemotherapy regimen may be an acceptable option for patients with peritoneal dissemination. We plan to study this regimen further in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination.

Sudden bilateral sensorineural hearing loss as the presenting symptom of meningeal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer: report of a case

Meningeal carcinomatosis is the diffuse infiltration of the meninges by metastatic carcinoma. A 62-year-old man presented with a sudden onset of profound hearing loss affecting both ears. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images of both vestibulocochlear nerves. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a large type 3 gastric cancer, and the pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Although combination chemotherapy with oral S-1 and weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy were performed, the patient's condition gradually worsened, and he eventually died 12 weeks after the onset of deafness. Isolated bilateral hearing loss is therefore considered to be a rare first manifestation of meningeal carcinomatosis.

Multicenter phase II trial of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin triplet combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of S-1, paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² plus cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and S-1 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1-14 based on a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the current study, among whom 38 were assessable for efficacy and all assessable for toxicity. Two complete response and 24 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 59.1%. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival was 9.4 (95% CI 6.8-12.1) months and 11.2 (95% CI 7.6-14.8) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 45 events (20.9%) and febrile neutropenia was observed in five events (2.3%). The common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea (grade 1/2, 27.2%) and diarrhea (grade 1/2, 9.0%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer

A comprehensive review of phase I and phase II clinical trials of paclitaxel and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer was performed. Response rates, median progression-free survivals, and median overall survivals were examined, together with the treatment regimens and the numbers of patients registered in each trial. Although paclitaxel monotherapy produced considerable improvement in tumor response and prognosis, combination doublet or triplet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or platinum compounds showed better results than the paclitaxel monotherapy. With regard to the schedule of paclitaxel administration, weekly injection seemed to show less toxicity and better results than administration every 3 weeks. Adjuvant therapies, chemoradiation therapies, and paclitaxel treatment for gastric ascites were also investigated and are discussed.

Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of weekly i.v. and i.p. paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 was carried out in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination and/or cancer cells on peritoneal cytology were enrolled. PTX was administered i.v. at 50 mg/m(2) and i.p. at 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. The primary end point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, efficacy against malignant ascites and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, including 21 with primary tumors with peritoneal dissemination, 13 with peritoneal recurrence and six with positive peritoneal cytology only. The median number of courses was 7 (range 1-23). The 1-year OS rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 65% to 90%). The overall response rate was 56% in 18 patients with target lesions. Malignant ascites disappeared or decreased in 13 of 21 (62%) patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (18%) and anemia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy of i.v. and i.p. PTX with S-1 is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

The number of metastatic lymph nodes is a significant risk factor for bone metastasis and poor outcome after surgery for linitis plastica-type gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Linitis plastica-type gastric carcinoma remains a disease with poor prognosis despite an aggressive surgical approach. Although a prominent pattern of disease failure is peritoneal carcinomatosis, some patients experience rapid disease progression without signs of the peritoneal disease.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data from 178 patients with linitis plastica-type gastric cancer operated on between 1991 and 2000 were analyzed. Survival stratified by curability of surgery, pN stage, and patterns of failure were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and chi(2) test was used to evaluate correlation between the number of metastatic lymph nodes in terms of pN categories and the incidence of various patterns of metastasis and recurrence. Cox regression hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

R0 resection was performed only among 82 patients (46% of those who underwent laparotomy). Node metastasis was frequent with only 22 patients classified as pN0. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was observed in 131 patients and was the commonest pattern of recurrence. Bone metastasis, found in 13 patients, was associated with poor outcome, and its incidence was significantly correlated with the number of metastatic nodes. pT4 status and pN3 status were identified as significant independent prognostic determinants.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategy for the linitis plastica should in general combine surgery with aggressive treatment directed toward peritoneal disease. However, patients with >16 metastatic nodes more often are associated with bone metastasis than those with modest nodal involvement and suffer from poor prognosis.

Pilot study of intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel and oral S-1 for patients with peritoneal metastasis due to advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer. A novel combination chemotherapy has been introduced for patients with advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

This pilot study was performed on four patients to confirm safety and efficacy. They were diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer with severe peritoneal dissemination by staging laparoscopy, or with metastasis to the transverse colon. We selected combined chemotherapy with both paclitaxel and S-1. Paclitaxel at 60 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/body was administered intraperitoneally on days 1 and 8 and S-1, at 80-120 mg/body, was administered orally for 14 days followed by 7 days' rest, as one course. After five courses of this therapy, the primary gastric tumors were evaluated by conventional examinations, and second-look laparoscopy was performed to assess the efficacy of the treatment against the peritoneal metastases.

RESULTS

After five courses, primary tumor reductions were confirmed, and no cancer cells were detected on pathocytological investigation during second-look laparoscopy in any of the patients. Three patients underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection and one underwent left upper abdominal evisceration. Final histological staging showed two stage 3 and two stage 4 patients. The intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel and the oral administration of S-1 were well tolerated. Three patients died, at 8, 15, and 29 months, respectively, after the initial treatment, and one has been alive for 54 months without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This chemotherapy can be used in the treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.

Gastrojejunostomy as induction treatment for S-1-based chemotherapy in patients with incurable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The development of new generation anticancer agents, including the oral drug, S-1, may alter the clinical importance of gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of incurable gastric cancer. We reviewed a series of patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy for this reason between 2002 and 2005.

METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent gastrojejunostomy followed by S-1-based chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer with obstruction or stenosis of the gastric outlet at Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital and two affiliated hospitals. The safety of gastrojejunostomy, outcome of palliation, and survival time were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the survival times with those of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy or exploratory laparotomy between 1987 and 2001.

RESULTS

The median operative time and blood loss were 153 min and 66 ml, respectively. There were no major complications. The median starting time for chemotherapy after gastrojejunostomy was 15.5 days. All patients were discharged after gastrojejunostomy, and the median postoperative home stay ratio was 68%. The median survival time after gastrojejunostomy was 354 days, which was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy or exploratory laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Gastrojejunostomy for incurable gastric cancer contributes not only to improving quality of life (QOL), but to prolonging survival through the induction and maintenance of S-1-based chemotherapy.

Emerging drugs for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer remains poor and therapy disappointing despite decades of experience with various chemotherapies, including the current gold standard, carboplatin/paclitaxel (TC).

OBJECTIVE

To review current and emerging therapies for ovarian cancer in search of ways to improve outcome, reduce toxicity, and maintain quality of life.

METHODS

This is a review of the current status of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, the ongoing clinical studies, emerging therapies, and proposals for future research.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Novel chemotherapeutic agents are needed to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy. Effective biological agents must be found and tested, either in combination with TC or as maintenance therapy after TC. An appropriate regimen and number of repeat treatment cycles for intraperitoneal chemotherapy is urgently needed, and an effective regimen must be established for patients with clear cell/mucinous adenocarcinoma. The main strategy for recurrent ovarian cancer is to find the gene related to drug resistance, then treat the cancer based on its molecular biology.

A multicenter phase II study of biweekly paclitaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This Phase II study assessed the activity and safety of biweekly paclitaxel and oral S-1 as treatment for unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer. The maximum tolerated dose for this regimen had been established previously in a Phase I study performed in Japanese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy was performed using two anticancer agents, S-1 and paclitaxel. Oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) was administered twice a day after meals for two consecutive weeks from Day 1 to 14, followed by a 2 week recovery period; paclitaxel (120 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously, biweekly, on Days 1 and 15. The patient received cycles of this regimen every 4 weeks (q 28-day cycles). The primary end point was the response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients (median age, 65 years) were enrolled; 13 other patients were screened, but found to be ineligible. All patients had unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer. The most common treatment-related Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (37.5%), appetite loss, diarrhea, decreased sodium (each 5%), and anemia, increased alanine aminotransferase, general fatigue, and dizziness (each 2.5%). Almost all the patients experienced alopecia. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a response rate of 43.6%. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 8-21 months), median survival was 256 days and the median time to progression was 4 months.

CONCLUSION

A combination regimen of biweekly paclitaxel and oral S-1 was well tolerated and showed promising activity against unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer.

Pharmacotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the seventh and oesophageal cancer the ninth most common cancer in the UK, and >50% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The incidence of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional tumours is increasing, making these important disease entities to understand and research. Despite improvements in surgical and peri-operative supportive care, 3-year overall survival with surgery alone for resectable disease is still poor. Outcomes in localised oesophageal cancer are improved with pre-operative chemotherapy, and in gastric cancer with peri-operative treatment or post-operative chemoradiotherapy. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy as an alternative to surgery. While survival in patients presenting with metastatic disease is improved with the addition of systemic chemotherapy, median survival remains <1 year. Patients who are otherwise fit can be offered chemotherapy and this is superior to best supportive care. Regimens including a platinum and an anthracycline agent are favoured by the results of randomised trials. No standard second-line therapy has emerged. New research into taxanes has shown promising anti-cancer activity, and novel areas of investigation include incorporation of agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor into standard regimens. This review focuses on the clinical trial evidence that dictates the optimal management of localised and advanced oesophagogastric cancer, focusing on pharmacotherapy. We examine areas of current research and highlight future therapeutic directions.

Phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

A phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and objective response rate (RR) in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-14. Paclitaxel was injected intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15, starting with a dose of 50 mg/m(2). The dose was increased in a stepwise manner.

RESULTS

In phase I, level 2 (60 mg/m(2)) was considered the MTD, because 2 of 3 patients in level 2 developed DLTs (grade 3 neutropenia and anemia, and grade 4 diarrhea and stomatitis). Therefore, the RD was determined to be level 1 (50 mg/m(2)). In phase II, efficacy and safety were assessed in 18 patients treated with the RD. The RR was 64.7% and the median survival time was 13.5 months. The most severe toxicities were grade 3 leukopenia (5.5%) and grade 3 neutropenia (5.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that S-1 combined with 50 mg/m(2) paclitaxel is effective and safe in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.