Induction of JNK and c-Abl signalling by cisplatin and oxaliplatin in mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient cells

Cisplatin in Liver Cancer Therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and is often diagnosed at an unresectable advanced stage. Systemic chemotherapy as well as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are used to treat advanced HCC. TACE and HAIC have long been the standard of care for patients with unresectable HCC but are limited to the treatment of intrahepatic lesions. Systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin or chemohormonal therapy with tamoxifen have also been considered, but neither has demonstrated survival benefits. In the treatment of unresectable advanced HCC, cisplatin is administered transhepatic arterially for local treatment. Subsequently, for cisplatin-refractory cases due to drug resistance, a shift to systemic therapy with a different mechanism of action is expected to produce new antitumor effects. Cisplatin is also used for the treatment of liver tumors other than HCC. This review summarizes the action and resistance mechanism of cisplatin and describes the treatment of the major hepatobiliary cancers for which cisplatin is used as an anticancer agent, with a focus on HCC.

Evaluation of toxicity and mutagenicity of oxaliplatin on germ cells in an alternative in vivo model Caenorhabditis elegans

The platinum compound oxaliplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug that shows a broad spectrum of activity in various human tumors. While the treatment-related side effects of oxaliplatin on directly treated individuals have been well-documented, little is known about the influence of oxaliplatin on germ cells and non-exposed progenies. Here we investigated the reproductive toxicity of oxaliplatin in a 3R-compliant in vivo model Caenorhabditis elegans, and evaluated the germ cell mutagenicity of oxaliplatin by using whole genome sequencing. Our results indicated that oxaliplatin treatment significantly disrupts development of spermatids and oocytes. By treating parental worms with oxaliplatin for three successive generations, sequencing data unveiled the clear mutagenic effects of oxaliplatin on germ cells. Analysis of genome-wide mutation spectra showed the preferentially induction of indels by oxaliplatin. In addition, we uncovered the involvement of translesion synthesis polymerase ζ in modulating mutagenic effects of oxaliplatin. These findings suggest that germ cell mutagenicity is worthy of consideration for the health risk assessment of chemotherapeutic drugs, while the combined use of alternative in vivo models and next generation sequencing technology appears to be a promising way for the preliminary safety assessment of various drugs.

Cisplatin-based combination therapy for cancer

Cisplatin, that is, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum is a coordinate compound that is mainly preferred as prior treatment against several solid tumors and malignancies like ovaries, head and neck, testicular, and lung cancers because of its anticancer activity. Cisplatin binds at the N7 position of purine and forms adducts, leading to altered activity of DNA that triggers apoptosis. DNA damage is followed by several signaling pathways like induced oxidative stress, upregulated p53, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) or Akt pathways along with induced apoptosis. Additionally, cisplatin treatment comes with few disadvantages such as toxic effects, that is, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, etc., and drug resistance. Furthermore, to overcome cisplatin resistance and toxicological effects, combination drug therapy has been considered. The aim of the review is to focus on the molecular mechanism of action of cisplatin and combination drug therapy to reduce the side effects in cancer therapy.

Diversity of dose-individualization and therapeutic drug monitoring practices of platinum compounds: a review

Introduction: Platinum-derived drugs are commonly used for the treatment of solid tumors. The differences in chemical structures of these molecules lead to different pharmacological properties, in terms of indication, efficacy, and toxicity. Their pharmacokinetics (PK) differ according to their respective renal elimination and have led to many studies investigating their dose optimization. Area covered: This review attempts to summarize and compare PK and pharmacodynamics of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, with an emphasis on differences of dose calculations and opportunities for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in various patient populations. Expert opinion: Although cisplatin and carboplatin can be considered as analogs since they share the same DNA interacting properties, the slower hydrolysis of the latter results in a better safety profile. Carboplatin is the only drug in oncology to be administrated according to a target area under the curve of concentration versus time, considering that its PK variability is almost fully explained by renal function, not by body size. This enables individual dosing based on predicted carboplatin clearance (along with patients renal characteristics) or on actual clearance with TDM, especially in a high-dose protocol.

Mechanistic perspective of protective effects of nilotinib against cisplatin-induced testicular injury in rats: Role of JNK/caspase-3 signaling inhibition

Cisplatin is an effective anticancer used widely in treatment of solid and germ cell tumors, however, the immense toxicity on healthy tissues discourages cisplatin use in prolonged treatment protocols. Testicular toxicity is amongst its undesired adverse effects. Nilotinib is a second generation multityrosine kinase inhibitor which is used as an anticancer agent with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. In the present study, a single dose of cisplatin (7 mg/kg, I.P) to rats induced a significant testicular injury. Daily administration of nilotinib (20 mg/kg, orally) 24 h post cisplatin injection for 10 days ameliorated testicular damage. Nilotinib significantly increased serum testosterone and sperm concentration outside frame of oligospermia with simultaneous full recovery of sperm viability. Nevertheless, biomarkers of apoptosis such as JNKs and Caspase -3, were significantly reduced. Moreover, improved antioxidant status of the testes was inferred by significant elevation of GSR, SOD and TAC alongside with reduction in lipid peroxidation biomarkers; MDA and 4-HNE. Flow Cytometry analysis of the cell cycle confirmed a significant increase in the percentage of testicular cells present in G2/M phase and a significant decrease in the percentage of apoptotic testicular cells after nilotinib administration. Histopathologically, nilotinib preserved testicular architecture showing significant numbers of sperm and spermatids within lumens of seminiferous tubule. Furthermore, nilotinib enhanced testicular expression of Ki67 significantly, providing evidence of testicular regeneration. In conclusion, nilotinib refinement of cisplatin induced testicular toxicity is attributed to enhancing antioxidant capabilities, decreasing apoptotic signals and restoring regenerative capacity of testes suggesting nilotinib to be used in conjunction with cisplatin in treatment protocols to avoid cisplatin induced long term testicular toxicity.

The mismatch repair-dependent DNA damage response: Mechanisms and implications

An important role for the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway in maintaining genomic stability is embodied in its conservation through evolution and the link between loss of MMR function and tumorigenesis. The latter is evident as inheritance of mutations within the major MMR genes give rise to the cancer predisposition condition, Lynch syndrome. Nonetheless, how MMR loss contributes to tumorigenesis is not completely understood. In addition to preventing the accumulation of mutations, MMR also directs cellular responses, such as cell cycle checkpoint or apoptosis activation, to different forms of DNA damage. Understanding this MMR-dependent DNA damage response may provide insight into the full tumor suppressing capabilities of the MMR pathway. Here, we delve into the proposed mechanisms for the MMR-dependent response to DNA damaging agents. We discuss how these pre-clinical findings extend to the clinical treatment of cancers, emphasizing MMR status as a crucial variable in selection of chemotherapeutic regimens. Also, we discuss how loss of the MMR-dependent damage response could promote tumorigenesis via the establishment of a survival advantage to endogenous levels of stress in MMR-deficient cells.

The effects of BRCA1 expression on the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to platinum agents

Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein, which is involved in homologous recombination to repair DNA double strand breaks and maintain genome stability. When BRCA1 is mutated or altered, DNA damage may not be effectively repaired, which leads to DNA replication errors and cancer growth. Accordingly, people carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 gene possess an increased risk of several types of cancer, including breast and ovarian cancer. Previous clinical studies have reported an association between BRCA1 expression level and the incidence of gastric cancer; however, to the best of our knowledge, an in vitro study has not been performed to support these clinical observations. Therefore, the present study evaluated BRCA1 expression levels in gastric cancer cell lines. In addition, the IC₅₀ values of cisplatin and oxaliplatin in each cell line were determined to investigate a potential correlation between BRCA1 expression level and chemosensitivity to platinum agents. The present results revealed that the BRCA1 expression level in gastric cancer is variable and associated with the treatment response to platinum-based chemotherapy. This suggests that BRCA1 may serve as a therapeutic marker for platinum-based chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

MLH1 enhances the sensitivity of human endometrial carcinoma cells to cisplatin by activating the MLH1/c-Abl apoptosis signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

MLH1 plays a critical role in maintaining the fidelity of DNA replication, and defects in human MLH1 have been reported. However, the role of MLH1 in endometrial carcinoma has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we aimed to study the role of MLH1 in the sensitivity of human endometrial carcinoma cells to cisplatin.

METHODS

In this study, we detected the expression of MLH1 in Ishikawa and RL95-2 cells. MLH1-siRNA and ADV-MLH1 were adopted for the silencing and overexpression of MLH1, respectively. Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, cell proliferation assays, and cell cycle and apoptotic analyses by flow cytometry were employed to explore the underlying mechanism. A mouse xenograft model was used to investigate the effect of MLH1 on tumor growth after treatment with cisplatin.

RESULTS

Over-expression of MLH1 in Ishikawa cells dramatically increased the sensitivity of cells to cisplatin and enhanced cell apoptosis. By contrast, knockdown of MLH1 yielded the opposite effects in vitro. Mechanistically, cisplatin induced the MLH1/c-Abl apoptosis signaling pathway in ADV-MLH1-infected endometrial carcinoma cells, and these effects involved c-Abl, caspase-9, caspase-3 and PARP. Altogether, our results indicate that ADV-MLH1 might attenuate Ishikawa cell growth in vivo, resulting in increased cisplatin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1 may render endometrial carcinoma cells more sensitive to cisplatin by activating the MLH1/c-Abl apoptosis signaling pathway. In addition, an applicable adenovirus vector (ADV-MLH1) for MLH1 overexpression in endometrial carcinoma was generated. Thus, ADV-MLH1 might be a novel potential therapeutic target for endometrial carcinoma.

Combination of gemcitabine-containing magnetoliposome and oxaliplatin-containing magnetoliposome in breast cancer treatment: A possible mechanism with potential for clinical application

Breast cancer is a major global health problem with high incidence and case fatality rates. The use of magnetoliposomes has been suggested as an effective therapeutic approach because of their good specificity for cancers. In this study, we developed two novel magnetoliposomes, namely, Gemcitabine-containing magnetoliposome (GML) and Oxaliplatin-containing magnetoliposome (OML). These magnetoliposomes were combined (CGOML) was used to treat breast cancer under an external magnetic field. Biosafety test results showed that GML and OML were biologically safe to blood cells and did not adversely affect the behavior of mice. Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies indicated that both magnetoliposomes exhibited stable structures and persisted at the target area under an external magnetic field. Cell and animal experiments revealed that CGOML can markedly suppress the growth of MCF-7 cells, and only the CGOML group can minimize the tumor size among all the groups. Finally, CGOML can significantly inhibit MCF-7cell growth both in vitro and vivo by activating the apoptotic signaling pathway of MCF-7 cells.

A Novel Chemotherapeutic Agent to Treat Tumors with DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiencies

Impairing the division of cancer cells with genotoxic small molecules has been a primary goal to develop chemotherapeutic agents. However, DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer cells are resistant to most conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Here we have identified baicalein as a small molecule that selectively kills MutSα-deficient cancer cells. Baicalein binds preferentially to mismatched DNA and induces a DNA damage response in a MMR-dependent manner. In MutSα-proficient cells, baicalein binds to MutSα to dissociate CHK2 from MutSα leading to S-phase arrest and cell survival. In contrast, continued replication in the presence of baicalein in MutSα-deficient cells results in a high number of DNA double-strand breaks and ultimately leads to apoptosis. Consistently, baicalein specifically shrinks MutSα-deficient xenograft tumors and inhibits the growth of AOM-DSS-induced colon tumors in colon-specific MSH2 knockout mice. Collectively, baicalein offers the potential of an improved treatment option for patients with tumors with a DNA MMR deficiency. Cancer Res; 76(14); 4183-91. ©2016 AACR.

GADD45α modulates curcumin sensitivity through c-Abl- and JNK-dependent signaling pathways in a mismatch repair-dependent manner

Colorectal cancer is a critical health concern because of its incidence as the third most prevalent cancer in the world. Currently, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 6-thioguanine, and certain other genotoxic agents are mainstays of treatment; however, patients often die due to emergence of resistant population. Curcumin, a bioactive compound derived from the dietary turmeric (Curcuma longa) is an effective anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant agent. Previously, we reported that human colorectal cancer cell lines compromised for mismatch repair (MMR) function exhibit heightened sensitivity to curcumin due to sustained curcumin-induced unrepaired DNA damage compared to proficient population counterparts. In this report, we show that the protein levels of gadd45α, whose transcript levels are increased during DNA damage and stress signals, are upregulated following curcumin treatment in a dose- and time-dependent manner. We further observed that cells compromised for Mlh1 function (HCT116 + Ch2) displayed ~twofold increased GADD45α upregulation compared to similarly treated proficient counterparts (HCT116 + Ch3). Similarly, suppression of Mlh1 using ShRNA increased GADD45α upregulation upon curcumin treatment. On the other hand, suppression of GADD45α using SiRNA-blocked curcumin-induced cell death induction in Mlh1-deficient cells. Moreover, inhibition of Abl through ST571 treatment and its downstream effector JNK through SP600125 treatment blocked GADD45α upregulation and cell death triggered by curcumin. Collective results lead us to conclude that GADD45α modulates curcumin sensitivity through activation of c-Abl > JNK signaling in a mismatch repair-dependent manner.

Oxaliplatin in the era of personalized medicine: from mechanistic studies to clinical efficacy

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum compound approved for clinical use relatively recently as compared to other drugs of the same class. Its main cellular target is DNA, where similarly to cisplatin and carboplatin it forms cross-links. However, due to a unique indication for colorectal cancer, synergistic interaction with fluoropyrimidines and peculiar toxicity profile, oxaliplatin is different from those compounds. Multiple lines of evidence indicate differences in transport and metabolism, consequences of DNA platination, as well as DNA repair and transduction of DNA damage. Here, we explore the preclinical features that may explain the unique properties of oxaliplatin in the clinics. Among them, the capability to accumulate in tumor cells via organic cation transporters, to kill KRAS mutant cells and to activate immunogenic cell death appears helpful to explain in part its clinical behavior. The continuous investigation of the molecular pharmacology of oxaliplatin is expected to provide clues to the definitions of predictors of drug activity and toxicity to translate to the clinical setting.

DNA damage response in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Cisplatin and its derivatives are widely used chemotherapeutic drugs for cancer treatment. However, they have debilitating side effects in normal tissues and induce ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. In kidneys, cisplatin preferentially accumulates in renal tubular cells causing tubular cell injury and death, resulting in acute kidney injury (AKI). Recent studies have suggested that DNA damage and the associated DNA damage response (DDR) are an important pathogenic mechanism of AKI following cisplatin treatment. Activation of DDR may lead to cell cycle arrest and DNA repair for cell survival or, in the presence of severe injury, kidney cell death. Modulation of DDR may provide novel renoprotective strategies for cancer patients undergoing cisplatin chemotherapy.

Rho GTPases: Novel Players in the Regulation of the DNA Damage Response?

The Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) belongs to the family of Ras-homologous small GTPases. It is well characterized as a membrane-bound signal transducing molecule that is involved in the regulation of cell motility and adhesion as well as cell cycle progression, mitosis, cell death and gene expression. Rac1 also adjusts cellular responses to genotoxic stress by regulating the activity of stress kinases, including c-Jun-N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) and p38 kinases as well as related transcription factors. Apart from being found on the inner side of the outer cell membrane and in the cytosol, Rac1 has also been detected inside the nucleus. Different lines of evidence indicate that genotoxin-induced DNA damage is able to activate nuclear Rac1. The exact mechanisms involved and the biological consequences, however, are unclear. The data available so far indicate that Rac1 might integrate DNA damage independent and DNA damage dependent cellular stress responses following genotoxin treatment, thereby coordinating mechanisms of the DNA damage response (DDR) that are related to DNA repair, survival and cell death.

DNA mismatch repair gene MLH1 induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells

Mismatch repair (MMR) enzymes have been shown to be deficient in prostate cancer (PCa). MMR can influence the regulation of tumor development in various cancers but their role on PCa has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to determine the functional effects of the mutL-homolog 1 (MLH1) gene on growth of PCa cells. The DU145 cell line has been established as MLH1-deficient and thus, this cell line was utilized to determine effects of MLH1 by gene expression. Lack of MLH1 protein expression was confirmed by Western blotting in DU145 cells whereas levels were high in normal PWR-1E and RWPE-1 prostatic cells. MLH1-expressing stable transfectant DU145 cells were then created to characterize the effects this MMR gene has on various growth properties. Expression of MLH1 resulted in decreased cell proliferation, migration and invasion properties. Lack of cell growth in vivo also indicated a tumor suppressive effect by MLH1. Interestingly, MLH1 caused an increase in apoptosis along with phosphorylated c-Abl, and treatment with MLH1 siRNAs countered this effect. Furthermore, inhibition of c-Abl with STI571 also abrogated the effect on apoptosis caused by MLH1. These results demonstrate MLH1 protects against PCa development by inducing c-Abl-mediated apoptosis.

Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action

Cisplatin, cisplatinum, or cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II), is a well-known chemotherapeutic drug. It has been used for treatment of numerous human cancers including bladder, head and neck, lung, ovarian, and testicular cancers. It is effective against various types of cancers, including carcinomas, germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas. Its mode of action has been linked to its ability to crosslink with the purine bases on the DNA; interfering with DNA repair mechanisms, causing DNA damage, and subsequently inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. However, because of drug resistance and numerous undesirable side effects such as severe kidney problems, allergic reactions, decrease immunity to infections, gastrointestinal disorders, hemorrhage, and hearing loss especially in younger patients, other platinum-containing anti-cancer drugs such as carboplatin, oxaliplatin and others, have also been used. Furthermore, combination therapies of cisplatin with other drugs have been highly considered to overcome drug-resistance and reduce toxicity. This comprehensive review highlights the physicochemical properties of cisplatin and related platinum-based drugs, and discusses its uses (either alone or in combination with other drugs) for the treatment of various human cancers. A special attention is paid to its molecular mechanisms of action, and its undesirable side effects.

Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years

During the past two decades the first sequencing of the human genome was performed showing its high degree of inter-individual differentiation, as a result of large international research projects (Human Genome Project, the 1000 Genomes Project International HapMap Project, and Programs for Genomic Applications NHLBI-PGA). This period was also a time of intensive development of molecular biology techniques and enormous knowledge growth in the biology of cancer. For clinical use in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), in addition to fluoropyrimidines, another two new cytostatic drugs were allowed: irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Intensive research into new treatment regimens and a new generation of drugs used in targeted therapy has also been conducted. The last 20 years was a time of numerous in vitro and in vivo studies on the molecular basis of drug resistance. One of the most important factors limiting the effectiveness of chemotherapy is the primary and secondary resistance of cancer cells. Understanding the genetic factors and mechanisms that contribute to the lack of or low sensitivity of tumour tissue to cytostatics is a key element in the currently developing trend of personalized medicine. Scientists hope to increase the percentage of positive treatment response in CRC patients due to practical applications of pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics. Over the past 20 years the clinical usability of different predictive markers has been tested among which only a few have been confirmed to have high application potential. This review is a synthetic presentation of drug resistance in the context of CRC patient chemotherapy. The multifactorial nature and volume of the issues involved do not allow the author to present a comprehensive study on this subject in one review.

DNA polymerase ζ is a major determinant of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents

Oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin are cisplatin analogs that interact with DNA forming intrastrand and interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs). Replicative bypass of cisplatin DNA adducts requires the cooperative actions of at least three translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases: Polη, REV1, and Polζ. Because oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin contain bulkier chemical groups attached to the platinum core compared with cisplatin, we hypothesized that these chemical additions may impede replicative bypass by TLS polymerases and reduce tolerance to platinum-containing adducts. We examined multiple responses of cancer cells to oxaliplatin, satraplatin, or picoplatin treatment under conditions where expression of a TLS polymerase was limited. Our studies revealed that, although Polη contributes to the tolerance of cisplatin adducts, it plays a lesser role in promoting replication through oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin adducts. REV1 and Polζ were necessary for tolerance to all four platinum analogs and prevention of hyperactivation of the DNA damage response after treatment. In addition, REV1 and Polζ were important for the resolution of DNA double-stranded breaks created during replication-associated repair of platinum-containing ICLs. Consistent with ICLs being the predominant cytotoxic lesion, depletion of REV1 or Polζ rendered two different model cell systems extremely sensitive to all four drugs, whereas Polη depletion had little effect. Together, our data suggest that REV1 and Polζ are critical for promoting resistance to all four clinically relevant platinum-based drugs by promoting both translesion DNA synthesis and DNA repair.

MLH1-deficient HCT116 colon tumor cells exhibit resistance to the cytostatic and cytotoxic effect of the poly(A) polymerase inhibitor cordycepin (3'-deoxyadenosine) in vitro

Cordycepin (3'-deoxyadenosine) is an inhibitor of poly(A) polymerase (PAP), an enzyme crucial to mRNA 3'-end processing, which produces the shortening of poly(A) tails, leading to the destabilization of mRNAs. Cordycepin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in tumor cells, indicating its antitumor activity. Defective 3'-end processing is associated with hypersensitivity to UV treatment. We investigated the effects of cordycepin on proliferation and apoptosis in MLH1-deficient and MLH1-proficient HCT116 colon tumor cells. MLH1 is a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein involved in the processing of damaged DNA. Cells with defective MMR show resistance to certain anticancer drugs. The results showed that MLH1-deficient HCT116 cells are 2-fold less sensitive to the cytostatic effect of cordycepin, as compared to MLH1-proficient cells. This reduced sensitivity to cordycepin in MLH1-deficient cells was associated with reduced upregulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21. MLH1-deficient cells also exhibited reduced susceptibility to apoptosis upon treatment with cordycepin, as demonstrated by the reduced PARP-1 cleavage. Our findings showed that MLH1-deficient HCT116 colon tumor cells are resistant to the cytostatic and cytotoxic effect of cordycepin, indicating a possible involvement of MMR in mRNA polyadenylation. The findings also suggest that cordycepin is not suitable to therapeutically encounter tumor cells lacking MLH1 expression.

Flanking bases influence the nature of DNA distortion by platinum 1,2-intrastrand (GG) cross-links

The differences in efficacy and molecular mechanisms of platinum anti-cancer drugs cisplatin (CP) and oxaliplatin (OX) are thought to be partially due to the differences in the DNA conformations of the CP and OX adducts that form on adjacent guanines on DNA, which in turn influence the binding of damage-recognition proteins that control downstream effects of the adducts. Here we report a comprehensive comparison of the structural distortion of DNA caused by CP and OX adducts in the TGGT sequence context using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. When compared to our previous studies in other sequence contexts, these structural studies help us understand the effect of the sequence context on the conformation of Pt-GG DNA adducts. We find that both the sequence context and the type of Pt-GG DNA adduct (CP vs. OX) play an important role in the conformation and the conformational dynamics of Pt-DNA adducts, possibly explaining their influence on the ability of many damage-recognition proteins to bind to Pt-DNA adducts.

Late activation of stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun N-terminal kinases triggered by cisplatin-induced DNA damage in repair-defective cells

Although stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun N-terminal kinases (SAPK/JNK) are rapidly activated by genotoxins, the role of DNA damage in this response is not well defined. Here we show that the SEK1/MKK4-mediated dual phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK (Thr-183/Tyr-185) correlates with the level of cisplatin-DNA adducts at late times (16-24 h) after drug treatment in both human and mouse cells. Transfection of platinated plasmid DNA also caused SAPK/JNK activation. A defect in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair resting on a mutation in Cockayne syndrome group B protein promoted the late SAPK/JNK activation following cisplatin exposure. Signaling to SAPK/JNK was accompanied by activation of Ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related kinase, replication protein A, and checkpoint kinases as well as by the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Ionizing radiation-induced DSBs did not provoke SAPK/JNK activation, and inhibition of transcription also failed to provoke this response. Late activation of SAPK/JNK stimulated by cisplatin-induced DNA lesions was reduced in the absence of specific DNA repair proteins, such as xeroderma pigmentosum protein C, pointing to an essential function of individual repair factors in DNA damage signaling to SAPK/JNK. Collectively, the data indicate that late SAPK/JNK activation is triggered by non-repaired cisplatin adducts in transcribed genes and involves replication-associated events, DSBs, tyrosine kinases, Rho GTPases, and specific repair factors.

MSH3 mediates sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor

The MSH3 gene is one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes that has undergone somatic mutation frequently in MMR-deficient cancers. MSH3, together with MSH2, forms the MutSβ heteroduplex, which interacts with interstrand cross-links (ICLs) induced by drugs such as cisplatin and psoralen. However, the precise role of MSH3 in mediating the cytotoxic effects of ICL-inducing agents remains poorly understood. In this study, we first examined the effects of MSH3 deficiency on cytotoxicity caused by cisplatin and oxaliplatin, another ICL-inducing platinum drug. Using isogenic HCT116-derived clones in which MSH3 expression is controlled by shRNA expression in a Tet-off system, we discovered that MSH3 deficiency sensitized cells to both cisplatin and oxaliplatin at clinically relevant doses. Interestingly, siRNA-induced down-regulation of the MLH1 protein did not affect MSH3-dependent toxicity of these drugs, indicating that this process does not require participation of the canonical MMR pathway. Furthermore, MSH3-deficient cells maintained higher levels of phosphorylated histone H2AX and 53BP1 after oxaliplatin treatment in comparison with MSH3-proficient cells, suggesting that MSH3 plays an important role in repairing DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). This role of MSH3 was further supported by our findings that MSH3-deficient cells were sensitive to olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Moreover, the combination of oxaliplatin and olaparib exhibited a synergistic effect compared with either treatment individually. Collectively, our results provide novel evidence that MSH3 deficiency contributes to the cytotoxicity of platinum drugs through deficient DSB repair. These data lay the foundation for the development of effective prediction and treatments for cancers with MSH3 deficiency.

Fever-range whole body thermotherapy combined with oxaliplatin: a curative regimen in a pre-clinical breast cancer model

PURPOSE

Studies were conducted to test whether fever-range whole body thermal therapy would boost the efficacy of oxaliplatin chemotherapy without substantial toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of mild heat (40 degrees C) on oxaliplatin cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and platinum-DNA adduct formation was studied in vitro using the MTLn3 tumour cell line. In vivo oxaliplatin was administered at various doses and times before, during and after fever-range thermal therapy (6 h at 40 degrees C) to rats bearing an MTLn3 mammary adenocarcinoma. Tumour growth, survival, and toxicity were measured to determine treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Heating halved the oxaliplatin IC-50 dose for MTLn3 cells. Cellular uptake of platinum and platinum adducts increased by 34% and 36%, respectively, with heat. In vivo, 50% of all rats given 10 mg/kg oxaliplatin 24 h before thermal therapy were completely immunologically cured, while a further 11% regressed their primary tumour but ultimately succumbed to metastases, and 17% experienced a limited response with increased survival. The curative response occurred only in a narrow range of doses, with most cures at 10 mg/kg. Thermochemotherapy-treated, but uncured, animals had delayed incidence and slowed growth of metastases. Anti-tumour efficacy was greatest, and toxicity was least, when oxaliplatin was administered 12 or 24 h before fever-range whole body thermal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

When properly dosed and scheduled, oxaliplatin thermochemotherapy achieved permanent eradication of all primary and metastatic tumours in 50% of animals, seemingly through an immune response. Successful clinical translation of this protocol would yield hitherto unseen cures and substantial improvement in quality of life.

The DNA damage response pathway regulates the alternative splicing of the apoptotic mediator Bcl-x

Alternative splicing often produces effectors with opposite functions in apoptosis. Splicing decisions must therefore be tightly connected to stresses, stimuli, and pathways that control cell survival and cell growth. We have shown previously that PKC signaling prevents the production of proapoptotic Bcl-x(S) to favor the accumulation of the larger antiapoptotic Bcl-x(L) splice variant in 293 cells. Here we show that the genotoxic stress induced by oxaliplatin elicits an ATM-, CHK2-, and p53-dependent splicing switch that favors the production of the proapoptotic Bcl-x(S) variant. This DNA damage-induced splicing shift requires the activity of protein-tyrosine phosphatases. Interestingly, the ATM/CHK2/p53/tyrosine phosphatases pathway activated by oxaliplatin regulates Bcl-x splicing through the same regulatory sequence element (SB1) that receives signals from the PKC pathway. Convergence of the PKC and DNA damage signaling routes may control the abundance of a key splicing repressor because SB1-mediated repression is lost when protein synthesis is impaired but is rescued by blocking proteasome-mediated protein degradation. The SB1 splicing regulatory module therefore receives antagonistic signals from the PKC and the p53-dependent DNA damage response pathways to control the balance of pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-x splice variants.

Cellular responses to Cisplatin-induced DNA damage

Cisplatin is one of the most effective anticancer agents widely used in the treatment of solid tumors. It is generally considered as a cytotoxic drug which kills cancer cells by damaging DNA and inhibiting DNA synthesis. How cells respond to cisplatin-induced DNA damage plays a critical role in deciding cisplatin sensitivity. Cisplatin-induced DNA damage activates various signaling pathways to prevent or promote cell death. This paper summarizes our current understandings regarding the mechanisms by which cisplatin induces cell death and the bases of cisplatin resistance. We have discussed various steps, including the entry of cisplatin inside cells, DNA repair, drug detoxification, DNA damage response, and regulation of cisplatin-induced apoptosis by protein kinases. An understanding of how various signaling pathways regulate cisplatin-induced cell death should aid in the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer.

Platinum-DNA interactions and subsequent cellular processes controlling sensitivity to anticancer platinum complexes

Platinum-based compounds are widely used as chemotherapeutics for the treatment of a variety of cancers. The anticancer activity of cisplatin and other platinum drugs is believed to arise from their interaction with DNA. Several cellular pathways are activated in response to this interaction, which include recognition by high-mobility group and repair proteins, translesion synthesis by polymerases, and induction of apoptosis. The apoptotic process is regulated by activation of caspases, p53 gene, and several proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins. Such cellular processing eventually leads to an inhibition of the replication or transcription machinery of the cell. Deactivation of platinum drugs by thiols, increased nucleotide excision repair of Pt-DNA adducts, decreased mismatch repair, and defective apoptosis result in resistance to platinum therapy. The differences in cytotoxicity of various platinum complexes are attributed to the differential recognition of their adducts by cellular proteins. Cisplatin and oxaliplatin both produce mainly 1,2-GG intrastrand cross-links as major adducts, but oxaliplatin is found to be more active particularly against cisplatin-resistant tumor cells. Mismatch repair and replicative bypass appear to be the processes most likely involved in differentiating the molecular responses to these two agents. This review describes the formation of Pt-DNA adducts, their interaction with cellular components, and biological effects of this interaction.

A new isoquinolinium derivative, Cadein1, preferentially induces apoptosis in p53-defective cancer cells with functional mismatch repair via a p38-dependent pathway

We screened a protoberberine backbone derivative library for compounds with anti-proliferative effects on p53-defective cancer cells. A compound identified from this small molecule library, cadein1 (cancer-selective death inducer 1), an isoquinolinium derivative, effectively leads to a G(2)/M delay and caspase-dependent apoptosis in various carcinoma cells with non- functional p53. The ability of cadein1 to induce apoptosis in p53-defective colon cancer cells was tightly linked to the presence of a functional DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system, which is an important determinant in chemosensitivity. Cadein1 was very effective in MMR(+)/p53(-) cells, whereas it was not effective in p53(+) cells regardless of the MMR status. Consistently, when the function of MMR was blocked with short hairpin RNA in SW620 (MMR(+)/p53(-)) cells, cadein1 was no longer effective in inducing apoptosis. Besides, the inhibition of p53 increased the pro-apoptotic effect of cadein1 in HEK293 (MMR(+)/p53(+)) cells, whereas it did not affect the response to cadein1 in RKO (MMR(-)/p53(+)) cells. The apoptotic effects of cadein1 depended on the activation of p38 but not on the activation of Chk2 or other stress-activated kinases in p53-defective cells. Taken together, our results show that cadein1 may have a potential to be an anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agent that is preferentially effective on p53-mutant colon cancer cells with functional MMR.

Comparison of the combined action of oxaliplatin or cisplatin and radiation in cervical and lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To test the combined effects of oxaliplatin and radiation versus cisplatin and radiation using human cervical and lung cancer cell lines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CaSki cervical cancer cells, and A549 lung cancer cells were cultured under standard conditions. Cells were treated with escalating doses of gamma-irradiation (0-6 Gy), and with oxali- and cisplatin for 2 h or 24 h, or a combination of both. Cell survival was measured by a colony-forming assay. Survival curves were fitted to the data using the linear quadratic model. Sensitizer enhancement ratios (SER) were calculated at the 37% survival level, and isobologram analysis was applied to test for the drug-radiation interactions.

RESULTS

Oxaliplatin as well as cisplatin alone were cytotoxic in both cell lines. In CaSki cells, oxaliplatin and cisplatin significantly increased radiation toxicity. In A549 cells no increase of radiation toxicity was observed after treatment with cisplatin, however, isobologram analysis revealed supra-additive interaction between oxaliplatin and radiation in A549 cells.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin had the same effectiveness on tumor cells as cisplatin and induced enhanced radiation toxicity in lung cancer cells, where cisplatin was not able to achieve radiosensitization.

Coordination of DNA mismatch repair and base excision repair processing of chemotherapy and radiation damage for targeting resistant cancers

DNA damage processing by mismatch repair (MMR) and/or base excision repair (BER) can determine the therapeutic index following treatment of human cancers using radiation therapy and several classes of chemotherapy drugs. Over the last decade, basic and translational cancer research in DNA repair has led to an increased understanding of how these two DNA repair pathways can modify cytotoxicity to chemotherapy and/or ionizing radiation treatments in both normal and malignant tissues. This Molecular Pathways article provides an overview of the current understanding of mechanisms involved in MMR and BER damage processing, including insights into possible coordination of these two DNA repair pathways after chemotherapy and/or ionizing radiation damage. It also introduces principles of systems biology that have been applied to better understand the complexities and coordination of MMR and BER in processing these DNA damages. Finally, it highlights novel therapeutic approaches to target resistant (or DNA damage tolerant) human cancers using chemical and molecular modifiers of chemotherapy and/or ionizing radiation including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, methoxyamine and iododeoxyuridine (and the prodrug, 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose).

How DNA lesions are turned into powerful killing structures: insights from UV-induced apoptosis

Mammalian cells treated with ultraviolet (UV) light provide one of the best-known experimental systems for depicting the biological consequences of DNA damage. UV irradiation induces the formation of DNA photoproducts, mainly cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6-4) pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts [(6-4)PPs], that drastically impairs DNA metabolism, culminating in the induction of cell death by apoptosis. While CPDs are the most important apoptosis-inducing lesions in DNA repair proficient cells, recent data indicates that (6-4)PPs also signals for apoptosis in DNA repair deficient cells. The toxic effects of these unrepaired DNA lesions are commonly associated with transcription blockage, but there is increasing evidence supporting a role for replication blockage as an apoptosis-inducing signal. This is supported by the observations that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise at the sites of stalled replication forks, that these DSBs are potent inducers of apoptosis and that inhibition of S phase progression diminishes the apoptotic response. Reactive oxygen species, generated after exposure of mammalian cells to longer UV wavelengths, may also induce apoptotic responses. In this regard, emphasis is given to the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OxoG), but indirect induced lesions such as lipoperoxide DNA adducts also deserve attention. ATR is the main established sensor molecule for UV-induced DNA damage. However, there is evidence that ATM as well as the MAPK pathway also play a role in the UV response by activating either the death receptor or the mitochondrial damage pathway. Adding more complexity to the subject, cells under stress suffer other types of processes that may result in cell death. Autophagy is one of these processes, with extensive cross-talks with apoptosis. No matter the mechanisms, cell death avoids cells to perpetuate mutations induced by genotoxic lesions. The understanding of such death responses may provide the means for the development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of cancer.

A glucose derivative as natural alternative to the cyclohexane-1,2-diamine ligand in the anticancer drug oxaliplatin?

Having oxaliplatin as archetype, several platinum complexes with a carbohydrate moiety resembling the cyclohexane-1,2-diamine ligand of oxaliplatin have been prepared. As leaving groups, the anionic ligands iodide, oxalate, and malonate were utilized, and for comparison purposes the chloro complex was employed. All compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and electrospray mass spectrometry. The crystal structure of (SP-4-3)-diiodo(2,3-diamino-2,3-dideoxy-D-glucose-kappa(2)N,N')platinum(II) was determined by X-ray diffraction. The affinity toward dGMP was assayed by capillary electrophoresis, revealing that the chloro complex shows the highest reactivity, followed by the iodo complex. In contrast, the binding kinetics of the dicarboxylato complexes are slower, with the malonato complex being the least reactive. Reactivity to dGMP in the cell-free system correlates with cytotoxicity in two of four human cancer cell lines as determined by means of the MTT assay. In three of the four cell lines, the chloro and the malonato complex are the most and the least active of the carbohydrate-Pt complexes, respectively, with IC(50) values differing only by factors of up to 3.2. Cytotoxicity of the chloro complex is one to two orders of magnitude lower than that of oxaliplatin, but still comparable to that of carboplatin in two of the four cell lines.

Role of c-Abl kinase in DNA mismatch repair-dependent G2 cell cycle checkpoint arrest responses

Current published data suggest that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) triggers prolonged G(2) cell cycle checkpoint arrest after alkylation damage from N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) by activating ATR (ataxia telangiectasia-Rad3-related kinase). However, analyses of isogenic MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient human RKO colon cancer cells revealed that although ATR/Chk1 signaling controlled G(2) arrest in MMR-deficient cells, ATR/Chk1 activation was not involved in MMR-dependent G(2) arrest. Instead, we discovered that disrupting c-Abl activity using STI571 (Gleevec, a c-Abl inhibitor) or stable c-Abl knockdown abolished MMR-dependent p73alpha stabilization, induction of GADD45alpha protein expression, and G(2) arrest. In addition, inhibition of c-Abl also increased the survival of MNNG-exposed MMR-proficient cells to a level comparable with MMR-deficient cells. Furthermore, knocking down GADD45alpha (but not p73alpha) protein levels affected MMR-dependent G(2) arrest responses. Thus, MMR-dependent G(2) arrest responses triggered by MNNG are dependent on a human MLH1/c-Abl/GADD45alpha signaling pathway and activity. Furthermore, our data suggest that caution should be taken with therapies targeting c-Abl kinase because increased survival of mutator phenotypes may be an unwanted consequence.

Oxaliplatin activity in selected and unselected human ovarian and colorectal cancer cell lines

Oxaliplatin is used for treatment of colon cancer in combination with 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan. Oxaliplatin has similar, but also different resistant mechanisms as cisplatin. We studied the activity of oxaliplatin in ovarian and colon cancer cells with different resistance patterns to cisplatin. The 40-fold cisplatin-resistant cell line ADDP was only 7.5-fold resistant to oxaliplatin. The gemcitabine-resistant AG6000 cell line, 9-fold resistant to cisplatin, was not cross-resistant. LoVo-175X2, with mutant p53 showed no resistance compared to the empty vector control. However, LoVo-Li, with inactive p53, was 3.6-fold resistant corresponding to decreased accumulation and Pt adducts. Accumulation and DNA adducts formation showed no significant correlation with oxaliplatin sensitivity. Cell cycle distribution after exposure to oxaliplatin showed arrest in G2/M (A2780) or in S-phase (LoVo-92) for wt-p53 cells. ADDP and LoVo-Li showed G1 arrest followed by S-phase arrest and no changes in distribution, respectively. The cell cycle related proteins Cyclins A and B1 and (p)CDC25C were marginally affected by oxaliplatin. Expression of hCTR1 was decreased in ADDP, LoVo-Li and AG6000, OCT1 decreased in ADDP and AG6000 and OCT3 in LoVo-175X2, compared to the parental cell lines. In ADDP and LoVo-175X2 ATP7A and B were decreased but were increased in AG6000. From this study it can be concluded that changes in cell cycle distribution were cell line dependent and not related to changes in expression of Cyclin A or B1. Oxaliplatin accumulation was related to hCTR1 and, at low concentration, ATP7A to DNA adducts formation while the retention was related to hCTR1, OCT2 and ATP7B.

Combining radiation with oxaliplatin: a review of experimental results

Oxaliplatin is integrated in treatment strategies against a variety of cancers including chemoradiation protocols against gastrointestinal, especially rectal cancers. Solid biological data with respect to radiosensitizing activity of oxaliplatin are still rare. This review is based on in vitro and experimental in vivo data concerning the combination of oxaliplatin and radiation published until July 2007. Taking either cell viability or clonogenic survival as an endpoint all reported on oxaliplatin-induced radiosensitization, and enhancement ratios ranged from 1.1 to 2.2. In vivo, enhanced tumor growth delay after combined oxaliplatin and radiation treatment was also reported. Therefore, oxaliplatin should be considered a potent radiosensitizer, although the mechanisms causing radiosensitizing properties of oxaliplatin have not been studied in detail. Herein, they are discussed with respect to apoptosis induction, p53-related signalling, cell cycle control, and DNA-repair.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of combined calcitriol and cisplatin in dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors

PURPOSE

Calcitriol potentiates cisplatin-mediated activity in a variety of tumor models. We examine here, the effect of calcitriol and cisplatin pre-clinically and clinically in canine spontaneous tumors through in vitro studies on tumor cells and through a phase I study of calcitriol and cisplatin to identify the maximum-tolerated dosage (MTD) of this combination in dogs with cancer and to characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of calcitriol in dogs.

METHODS

Canine tumor cells were investigated for calcitriol/cisplatin interactions on proliferation using an MTT assay in a median-dose effect analysis; data were used to derive a combination index (CI). Cisplatin was given at a fixed dosage of 60 mg/m2. Calcitriol was given i.v. and the dosage was escalated in cohorts of three dogs until the MTD was defined. Serum calcitriol concentrations were quantified by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

In vitro, CIs < 1.0 were obtained for all combinations of calcitriol/cisplatin examined. The MTD was 3.75 microg/kg calcitriol in combination with cisplatin, and hypercalcemia was the dose-limiting toxicosis. The relationship between calcitriol dosage and either Cmax or AUC was linear. Calcitriol dosages >1.5 microg/kg achieved Cmax > or = 9.8 ng/mL and dosages >1.0 microg/kg achieved AUC > or = 45 h ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcitriol and cisplatin have synergistic antiproliferative effects on multiple canine tumor cells and high-dosages of i.v. calcitriol in combination with cisplatin can be safely administered to dogs. Cmax and AUC at the MTD 3.75 microg/kg calcitriol exceed concentrations associated with antitumor activity in a murine model, indicating this combination might have significant clinical utility in dogs.

A comparison of the platinum analogues in bladder cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a 3rd generation platinum analogue, which is active in a broad spectrum of tumours. Clinical trials using this drug in bladder cancer are underway, but not yet reported. There are currently no in vitro data regarding oxaliplatin in bladder cancer. Therefore, this study compares the efficacy of oxaliplatin with cisplatin and carboplatin, which are both used widely in this tumour type, in bladder cancer cell lines.

METHOD

The efficacy of oxaliplatin, carboplatin and cisplatin were compared in 4 bladder cancer cell lines (5637, J82, HT1197 and 253J). Cell parameters including cell number, viability and apoptosis were assessed after 3 days of drug exposure. The effects of the drugs on the cell cycle were also observed.

RESULTS

Overall cisplatin was the most potent at inducing cell death (IC(50) 11.5-70.6 microM). Oxaliplatin was the 2nd most potent drug (IC(50 )15.2-126.3 microM) and carboplatin the least effective (IC(50 )75.4-137.8 microM). Carboplatin was significantly less potent at inducing cell death than the other two drugs in all 4 cell lines. Carboplatin was also inferior at inducing apoptosis in 3 of the 4 cell lines. All three drugs had a similar effect on the cell cycle, causing an initial G2 block.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that oxaliplatin is a potent agent in bladder cancer cell lines and is superior to carboplatin in this in vitro setting. It justifies the clinical studies using oxaliplatin that are underway.

Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents

Platinating agents, including cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, have been used clinically for nearly 30years as part of the treatment of many types of cancers, including head and neck, testicular, ovarian, cervical, lung, colorectal and relapsed lymphoma. The cytotoxic lesion of platinating agents is thought to be the platinum intrastrand crosslink that forms on DNA, although treatment activates a number of signal transduction pathways. Treatment with these agents is characterized by resistance, both acquired and intrinsic. This resistance can be caused by a number of cellular adaptations, including reduced uptake, inactivation by glutathione and other anti-oxidants, and increased levels of DNA repair or DNA tolerance. Here we investigate the pathways that treatment with platinating agents activate, the mechanisms of resistance, potential candidate genes involved in the development of resistance, and associated clinical toxicities. Although the purpose of this review is to provide an overview of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, we have focused primarily on preclinical data that has clinical relevance generated over the past five years.

Late activation of stress kinases (SAPK/JNK) by genotoxins requires the DNA repair proteins DNA-PKcs and CSB

Although genotoxic agents are powerful inducers of stress kinases (SAPK/JNK), the contribution of DNA damage itself to this response is unknown. Therefore, SAPK/JNK activation of cells harboring specific defects in DNA damage-recognition mechanisms was studied. Dual phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK by the genotoxin methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) occurred in two waves. The early response (< or = 2 h after exposure) was similar in cells knockout for ATM, PARP, p53, and CSB or defective in DNA-PK(cs) compared with wild-type cells. The late response however (> or = 4 h), was drastically reduced in DNA-PK(cs) and Cockayne's syndrome B (CSB)-deficient cells. Similar results were obtained with human cells lacking DNA-PK(cs) and CSB. Activation of SAPK/JNK by MMS was not affected upon inhibition of base excision repair (BER), indicating base damage itself does not signal to SAPK/JNK. Because SAPK/JNK activation was attenuated in nongrowing cells, DNA replication-dependent processing of lesions, involving DNA-PK(cs) and CSB, appears to be required. DNA-PK(cs) coprecipitates with SEK1/MKK4 and SAPK/JNK, supporting a role of DNA-PK(cs) in SAPK/JNK activation. In this process, Rho GTPases are involved since inhibition of Rho impairs MMS-induced signaling to SAPK/JNK. The data show that sensing of DNA damage by DNA-PK(cs) and CSB causes a delayed SEK1/MKK4-mediated dual phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK.

Modifications of DNA by platinum complexes. Relation to resistance of tumors to platinum antitumor drugs

The importance of platinum drugs in cancer chemotherapy is underscored by the clinical success of cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)] and its analogues and by clinical trials of other, less toxic platinum complexes that are active against resistant tumors. The antitumor effect of platinum complexes is believed to result from their ability to form various types of adducts with DNA. Nevertheless, drug resistance can occur by several ways: increased drug efflux, drug inactivation, alterations in drug target, processing of drug-induced damage, and evasion of apoptosis. This review focuses on mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity of tumors to conventional cisplatin associated with DNA modifications. We also discuss molecular mechanisms underlying resistance and sensitivity of tumors to the new platinum compounds synthesized with the goal to overcome resistance of tumors to established platinum drugs. Importantly, a number of new platinum compounds were designed to test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between the extent of resistance of tumors to these agents and their ability to induce a certain kind of damage or conformational change in DNA. Hence, information on DNA-binding modes, as well as recognition and repair of DNA damage is discussed, since this information may be exploited for improved structure-activity relationships.

Preparation of antitumor oxaliplatin/cisplatin docking dinuclear platinum complex

A new dinuclear docking Pt(II) complex, (cis-diammine) (l-1,2-cyclohexanediamine)(mu-dichloro)-diplatinum(II) oxalate was synthesized by reacting oxaliplatin(l-OHP, [Pt(oxalato)(L-dach)]), L-dach = 1R, 2R-cyclohexanediamine), with cisplatin (CDDP). Elemental analysis of the compound indicated that it was 1:1 molar ratio complex of oxaliplatin and cisplatin. A plausible chemical structure has been proposed as Cl(-) bridged dinuclear complex, judged from its yellow coloration and NMR spectral analysis. This complex can be denoted as, i.e. [Pt(2)Cl(2)(NH(3))(2)(L-dach)](COO)(2) (L-OHP/CDDP). The complex showed higher cytotoxicity against L1210 than the parent complexes and low cross-resistance against L1210/CDDP and L1210/DACH. Its antitumor activity was also tested in vivo against murine leukemia L1210 cell lines. The complex showed much higher activity than the mixture(1:1 molar ratio) of oxaliplatin and cisplatin. The antitumor effect against L1210/CDDP was very high, showing collateral sensitivity, being similar to that of oxaliplatin, and against L1210/DACH it showed no cross-resistance.

Characterizations of irofulven cytotoxicity in combination with cisplatin and oxaliplatin in human colon, breast, and ovarian cancer cells

PURPOSE

This study assessed the cytotoxic effects of irofulven in combination with oxaliplatin and cisplatin in a panel of human cancer cell lines.

METHODS

Growth inhibition studies were performed using the human HT29 colon cancer cell line, irofulven-resistant derivative HT29/IF2, breast cancer cell line MCF7, and ovarian cancer line CAOV3. Irofulven-oxaliplatin combinations were compared with irofulven-cisplatin combinations in the same cell lines using similar experimental settings. Cells were exposed for 1 h to irofulven and then for 24 h to oxaliplatin or cisplatin and vice versa.

RESULTS

Single agent irofulven displayed cytotoxic effects against human colon HT29 cells, human breast cancer cell lines including MCF7, SKBR3, and ZR-75-1, and human ovarian cancer cell lines CAOV3, OVCAR3, and IGROV1, with OVCAR3 being the most sensitive cancer cell line (IC50: 2.4 microM). In all tested cell lines the oxaliplatin-irofulven combination led to clear evidence of synergistic activity. In HT29 and HT29/IF2, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective whereas in MCF7 cells, irofulven given prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin is more effective than the other schedule. The combination displays additive activity toward CAOV3 ovarian cells when irofulven was administered prior to or simultaneously with oxaliplatin and partially synergistic when oxaliplatin was followed by irofulven. In most of the cell lines, the sequence oxaliplatin followed by irofulven appears to be the most effective as compared to other schedules. A combination of irofulven with cisplatin has the same efficacy as with oxaliplatin for the same cell lines. Cell cycle studies show that irofulven increases the proportion of cells in the S phase. Cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations block cells in G1/S and potently induce apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Irofulven displays synergistic antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects when combined with oxaliplatin over a broad range of concentrations in human colon and breast cancer cells. Acquired resistance to irofulven has limited impact on the effects of cisplatin-irofulven and oxaliplatin-irofulven combinations. Based on these data, irofulven-oxaliplatin and cisplatin-irofulven combinations will be further explored in clinical trials, favoring the use schedules of oxaliplatin given prior to irofulven in patients with cancer.

Comparative analysis of the mutagenic activity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the Hprt gene of CHO cells

Oxaliplatin is a platinum-derived antitumor drug that is active against cisplatin-resistant tumors and has lower overall toxicity than does cisplatin. DNA adduct formation is believed to mediate the cytotoxic activity of both compounds; however, the adducts may also be responsible for mutagenic and secondary tumorigenic activities. In this study, we have compared the mutagenicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the Hprt gene of CHO-K1 cells. Both drugs produced dose-related increases in mutant frequency. For 1-hr treatments, oxaliplatin was less mutagenic than cisplatin at equimolar doses, while similar mutant frequencies were induced at equitoxic doses. Sequencing of mutant Hprt genes indicated that the mutation spectra of both oxaliplatin and cisplatin were significantly different from the spontaneous mutation spectrum (P = 0.014 and P = 0.008, respectively). A significant difference was also observed between the spectra of oxaliplatin- and cisplatin-induced mutations (P = 0.033). Although G:C-->T:A transversion was the most common mutation produced by both compounds, oxaliplatin produced higher frequencies of A:T-->T:A transversion than did cisplatin, most commonly at nucleotide 307, and higher frequencies of small deletions/insertions. Also, cisplatin induced tandem base-pair substitutions, mainly at positions 135/136, and a higher frequency of G:C-->A:T transition than did oxaliplatin. These results provide the first evidence that oxaliplatin is mutagenic and that the profiles of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-induced mutations display not only similarities but also distinctive features relating to the type and sequence-context preference for mutation. Environ.

Recognition and processing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts

The cytotoxicity of platinum compounds is thought to be determined primarily by their DNA adducts. Cisplatin and oxaliplatin are structurally distinct, but form the same types of adducts at the same sites on DNA. However, the DNA adducts are differentially recognized by a number of cellular proteins. For example, mismatch repair proteins and some damage-recognition proteins bind to cisplatin-GG adducts with higher affinity than to oxaliplatin-GG adducts, and this differential recognition of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts is thought to contribute to the differences in cytotoxicity and tumor range of cisplatin and oxaliplatin. A detailed kinetic analysis of the insertion and extension steps of dNTP incorporation in the vicinity of the adduct shows that both DNA polymerase beta (pol beta) and DNA polymerase eta (pol eta) catalyze translesion synthesis past oxaliplatin-GG adducts with greater efficiency than past cisplatin-GG adducts. In the case of pol eta, the efficiency and fidelity of translesion synthesis in vitro is very similar to that previously observed with cyclobutane TT dimers, suggesting that pol eta is likely to be involved in error-free bypass of Pt adducts in vivo. This has been confirmed for cisplatin by comparing the cisplatin-induced mutation frequency in human fibroblast cell lines with and without pol eta. Thus, the greater efficiency of bypass of oxaliplatin-GG adducts by pol eta may explain the lower mutagenicity of oxaliplatin compared to cisplatin. The ability of these cellular proteins to discriminate between cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts suggest that there exist significant conformational differences between the adducts, yet the crystal structures of the cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts were very similar. We have recently solved the solution structure of the oxaliplatin-GG adduct and have shown that it is significantly different from the previously published solution structures of the cisplatin-GG adducts. Furthermore, the observed differences in conformation provide a logical explanation for the differential recognition of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by mismatch repair and damage-recognition proteins.