Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Feasibility of Combination Intra-arterial Yttrium-90 and Irinotecan Microspheres in the VX2 Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the combination of 90Y radioembolization (Y90) and drug-eluting bead irinotecan (DEBIRI) microspheres in the VX2 rabbit model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An initial dose finding study was performed in 6 White New Zealand rabbits to identify a therapeutic but subcurative dose of Y90. In total, 29 rabbits were used in four groups: Y90 treatment (n = 8), DEBIRI treatment (n = 6), Y90 + DEBIRI treatment (n = 7), and an untreated control group (n = 8). Hepatic toxicity was evaluated at baseline, 24 h, 72 h, 1 week, and 2 weeks. MRI tumor volume (TV) and enhancing tumor volume were assessed baseline and 2 weeks. Tumor area and necrosis were evaluated on H&E for pathology.

RESULTS

Infused activities of 84.0-94.4 MBq (corresponding to 55.1-72.7 Gy) were selected based on the initial dose finding study. Infusion of DEBIRI after Y90 was technically feasible in all cases (7/7). Overall, 21/29 animals survived to 2 weeks, and the remaining animals had extrahepatic disease on necropsy. Liver transaminases were elevated with Y90, DEBIRI, and Y90 + DEBIRI compared to control at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week post-treatment and returned to baseline by 2 weeks. By TV, Y90 + DEBIRI was the only treatment to show statistically significant reduction at 2 weeks compared to the control group (p = 0.012). The change in tumor volume (week 2-baseline) for both Y90 + DEBIRI versus control (p = 0.002) and Y90 versus control (p = 0.014) was significantly decreased. There were no statistically significant differences among groups on pathology.

CONCLUSION

Intra-arterial Y90 + DEBIRI was safe and demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity in rabbit VX2 tumors. This combined approach warrants further investigation.

Increased local failure for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST0531: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate local control for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol ARST0531.

METHODS

This study analyzed 424 patients with intermediate-risk RMS. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy with either vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine and irinotecan. With the goal of improving local control, radiation therapy (RT) was delivered early at week 4 and was concurrent with irinotecan in the experimental arm. Individualized local control plans for children 24 months old or younger were allowed. Local failure on ARST0531 was compared with local failure on the preceding COG intermediate-risk study, D9803.

RESULTS

For patients with group I/II alveolar RMS (n = 55), the 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 13.4%; for group III alveolar RMS (n = 141), it was 20.2%; and for group III embryonal RMS (n = 228), it was 27.9% (P = .03). Among patients with group III disease, local failure did not differ by histology, site, nodal status, RT modality, or treatment arm. Local failure was worse for a tumor size >5 cm (32.3% vs 16.7%; P = .001). Among patients with group III embryonal RMS, local failure was higher on ARST0531 than D9803 (27.9% vs 19.4%; P = .03). After the exclusion of patients 24 months old or younger or patients who did not receive radiation, local failure remained significantly increased on ARST0531 (P = .02). After adjustments for clinical prognostic factors, event-free survival and overall survival were worse on ARST0531 (P = .004 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite interventions designed to enhance local control, local control was inferior on ARST0531 in comparison with D9803. The reason for this is unclear, but it could be the reduced cyclophosphamide dose on ARST0531.

Phase I dose-escalation study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, targeting all four isoforms of class I PI3K (α, β, γ and δ). This open-label Phase I dose-escalation study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of continuous daily buparlisib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic marker changes. Fifteen patients were treated at 25 mg/day (n = 3), 50 mg/day (n = 3) and 100 mg/day (n = 9) dose levels. One dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 4 abnormal liver function occurred at 100 mg/day. Considering the safety profile and the maximum tolerated dose in the first-in-man study of buparlisib in non-Japanese patients, further dose escalation was stopped and 100 mg/day was declared the recommended dose. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash, abnormal hepatic function (including increased transaminase levels), increased blood insulin levels and increased eosinophil count. Hyperglycemia was experienced by two patients, one Grade 1 and one Grade 4, and mood alterations were experienced by three patients, two Grade 1 and one Grade 2. Pharmacokinetic results showed that buparlisib was rapidly absorbed in a dose-proportional manner. Best overall response was stable disease for six patients, including one unconfirmed partial response. In these Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, buparlisib had a manageable safety profile, with similar pharmacokinetics to non-Japanese patients. The recommended dose of 100 mg/day will be used in future studies of buparlisib in Japanese patients.

Clinical development of S-1 for non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese perspective

For more than a decade, S-1 has been investigated aggressively against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Recently, two randomized phase III trials of S-1 combined with cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA) compared with the standard platinum doublet chemotherapy were reported. S-1 and CDDP was noninferior to CDDP and DTX in terms of overall survival (OS) (median survival time [MST] 16.1 versus 17.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 1.013; 96.4% confidence interval [CI] 0.837-1.227). Noninferiority of S-1 and CBDCA compared with CBDCA and paclitaxel was also confirmed for OS (MST 15.2 versus 13.3 months, respectively; HR 0.928; 99.2% CI 0.671-1.283). The noninferiority design employed an upper CI limit of HR<1.322 in the former trial and HR<1.33 in the latter. S-1 combined with CDDP or CBDCA was thought to be one of the standard platinum doublet regimens in the first-line setting for patients with advanced NSCLC in Japan. Some additional interesting phase I and II studies have been published in Japan. They include studies of S-1 as first-line chemotherapy when combined with nonplatinum agents; as second-line chemotherapy; within chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease; and in the postoperative adjuvant setting. This review will also describe the use of S-1 for the treatment of NSCLC in these settings.

Concurrent radiation with irinotecan and carboplatin in intermediate- and high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report on toxicity and efficacy from a prospective pilot phase II study

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan is highly active against rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), yet its tolerability and efficacy in combination with radiation is unknown. We examined local control and toxicities in RMS patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) in combination with radiosensitizing agents irinotecan + carboplatin (I + C).

PROCEDURE

From 11/2003 to 1/2011, 60 patients were enrolled on a pilot phase II protocol with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk RMS at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Induction therapy consisted of two cycles of I + C followed by three cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. At week 13, 47 patients received definitive primary-site RT or post-operative RT with two concurrent cycles of I + C. Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range 30.6-50.4 Gy). Radiation-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.

RESULTS

Median age of the cohort was 9 years. With median follow-up of 32 months, 2.5 year actuarial local control was 89%. Among all patients, grades 3 and 4 dermatitis were observed in 11% and 4%, respectively. Among parameningeal, orbit, and other head/neck sites, rates of grades 3 and 4 mucositis were 20% and 10%, respectively. Among abdomen/pelvis sites, 12% developed grade 3 diarrhea and 6% developed grade 3 cystitis. No treatment breaks were necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results of irinotecan and carboplatin administered with concurrent RT in intermediate- and high-risk RMS demonstrated favorable tolerability, efficacy, and local control. Reduced rates of acute grades 3-4 mucositis were observed when compared with historical results.

DNA topoisomerase I drugs and radiotherapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer represents the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and around the world. DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) drugs such as irinotecan and topotecan represent a unique class of chemotherapeutic agents that exhibit not only potent cytotoxic effect, but also tumor-selective radiation-sensitizing effect. The mechanism of cytotoxicity and radiation sensitization by TOP1 drugs has been intensely investigated. Modern radiotherapy, aided by improved imaging and treatment delivery technology, is capable of targeting tumors more precisely, while sparing surrounding critical structures. Clinical trials with camptothecin derivatives and radiotherapy have been conducted in lung cancers. Combined modality therapy with TOP1 drugs and radiotherapy offers a new frontier for lung cancer therapy. We review the present state of TOP1-targeted chemotherapy and modern radiotherapy for lung cancer.

A phase II study of cisplatin and irinotecan as induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant thoracic radiotherapy with weekly low-dose irinotecan in unresectable, stage III, non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9706

OBJECTIVE

It is important to identify optimal regimens of cisplatin-based, third-generation chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy for patients with unresectable, Stage III, non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable, Stage III non-small cell lung cancer were treated with the following regimen: cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29, with irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43 and 30 mg/m(2) on days 57, 64, 71, 78, 85 and 92. Thoracic radiotherapy was started on day 57 at 2 Gy/day (total 60 Gy).

RESULTS

From February 1998 to January 1999, 68 patients were enrolled. Grade 3/4 toxicities during induction chemotherapy primarily included neutropenia (73.5%) and diarrhea (20.6%), while Grade 3/4 toxicities during concomitant thoracic radiotherapy with irinotecan consisted of neutropenia (18.4%), esophagitis (4.1%) and hypoxia (6.5%). There was one treatment-related death due to radiation pneumonitis. The response rate was 64.7% (95% confidence interval, 52.2-75.9%). The median survival time was 16.5 (95% confidence interval, 12.6-19.8) months. The 1- and 2 year survival rates were 65.8% (95% confidence interval, 54.4-77.1%) and 32.9% (95% confidence interval, 21.6-44.1%), respectively. Overall, only 36 (56%) completed both the scheduled chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus irinotecan followed by low-dose irinotecan and concomitant thoracic radiotherapy was feasible according to the prespecified decision criteria in this study for patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. We did not decide to select this regimen for further investigations because approximately half of the patients completed the scheduled treatment.

Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin and irinotecan followed by consolidation docetaxel for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In 2003, consolidation docetaxel was a promising concept for unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To test the hypothesis that chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin and irinotecan followed by consolidation docetaxel would be feasible and clinically active, we conducted a phase II study.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with unresectable stage IIIA/B NSCLC received irinotecan (30 mg/m) and carboplatin dosed to a target area under the concentration curve of 2, each administered weekly for 7 weeks. Concurrent radiotherapy was administered more than 7 weeks to a total dose of 63 Gy in 35 fractions. Consolidation docetaxel (75 mg/m) was administered every 3 weeks for 3 doses 4 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was objective response rate by RECIST.

RESULTS

Complete responses occurred in 4 patients and partial responses occurred in 14, for an objective response rate of 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.7-73.6%). Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.6-13.5); median duration of survival was 14.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-27.3). The most common hematologic toxicity was leukopenia, which were grade 3 or 4 in 16 patients (50%). Radiation pneumonitis (grade >or=2) occurred in 13 of 31 treated patients (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin and irinotecan followed by consolidation docetaxel is clinically active based on median survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC; however, the 42% incidence of clinical radiation pneumonitis was unexpected and warrants further investigation to determine the mechanism and preventive strategies.

Phase I study of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the phase II dose for the combination of irinotecan-carboplatin-paclitaxel given as induction chemotherapy and with concomitant chest radiotherapy for patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 to 2, stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC patients with resectable or unresectable disease were treated with induction chemotherapy (irinotecan 100 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC 5, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 days 1 and 22) followed by concomitant chemotherapy (irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel) and chest radiotherapy (66 Gy for unresectable and 50 Gy for resectable disease) beginning on week 7. The primary objective was to escalate the dose of irinotecan during chemoradiation in sequential cohorts to determine the DLT and MTD of the regimen.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 57% male, 41% performance status 0, 30% resectable). Induction chemotherapy was tolerable and active (response rate 26%; stable disease 60%). Eight patients did not receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy because of progressive disease (5), death (1), hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel (1), and withdrawal of consent (1). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The concomitant administration of chest radiotherapy with weekly irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was not feasible at the first, second, and third dose levels. DLT was failure to achieve recovery to <or= grade 1 absolute neutrophil count by the day of scheduled chemotherapy administration. Dose de-escalation to irinotecan 30 mg/m2, paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 (with omission of carboplatin) delivered on weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6 of radiotherapy was the MTD. After induction chemotherapy, partial responses, stable disease, and progressive disease was observed in 26%, 60%, and 14% of patients, respectively. After chemoradiotherapy, partial responses were attained in 16 (55%) patients, whereas 12 patients (41%) attained disease stabilization. Median overall survival was 21 months for the entire cohort. Resectable patients had a median survival of 24 months, whereas unresectable patients had a median survival of 19 months. Differences in overall and progression-free survival rates between resectable and unresectable patients was not statistically significant (p = 0.52 and p = 0.90, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was poorly tolerated as a result of neutropenia. Although dose de-escalation was required for delivery of the regimen, the response rates and survival outcomes were comparable to other similar regimens.

Irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a multiinstitutional phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: chemotherapy-naive, good performance status (PS, 0-2), age <75, stage III, and adequate organ function. The patients received irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 1 in the first group. The doses were reduced to 50 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively, in the second group. Two cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 4 weeks. Split-course thoracic radiotherapy of 2 Gy/day commenced on Day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 28 and 32 Gy administered in the first and second cycles, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were eligible and 48 (16 in the first, 32 in the second group) patients were assessable for response, toxicity, and survival. The overall response was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-93%). Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, pneumonitis, esophagitis, and fatigue occurred in 21%, 48%, 19%, 10%, and 19%, respectively. The median time to progression was 8.2 months. The median overall survival time and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 20.1 months, 47.1%, and 17.1%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, the overall response, and the median survival times of the first/second groups were 63%/41%, 19%/19%, 75%/88%, and 13.1/33.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined modality of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent TRT is active and further investigations are warranted at the second group dose level.

Phase I Study of Radical Thoracic Radiation, Weekly Irinotecan, and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and cisplatin individually are active in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Each is synergistic with radiation. Dosages of 65 mg/m2 of irinotecan and 30 mg/m2 of cisplatin Q weekly times four every 6 weeks yielded a 36% response rate and median survival of 11.6 months in advanced NSCLC (Jagasia et al.; Clinical Cancer Research 7: 68, 2001). A weekly schedule for each agent (versus less frequent doses) limits toxicity and increases the opportunity for radiosensitization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We initiated a phase I study of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin during radical thoracic radiation (TRT). Cisplatin was fixed at 25 mg/m2 Q weekly times seven. Irinotecan was dosed initially at 30 mg/m2 per week for 7 weeks and was increased by 10 mg/m2 per week in three- to six-patient cohorts. TRT was administered in 34 single daily fractions to 63 Gy. Eligibility stipulated locally advanced NSCLC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1; < or = 10% unintended weight loss; and adequate physiologic indices.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were accrued: nine were stage IIIB, five were stage IIIA, and one had isolated mediastinal node recurrence after prior surgery. Median age was 65 years (range, 47-77). Seven patients received irinotecan at a dose of 30 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 1). Seven other patients received irinotecan at a dose of 40 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 2). The one other patient received irinotecan in doses of 50 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 3). Neutropenic fever occurred in one patient each at dose levels 1 and 2. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in three patients at each dose level. Transient grade 3 diarrhea occurred in one patient at dose level 1. Esophagitis of grade 3 or higher occurred in one patient each at dose levels 2 and 3. There was one late grade 3 pneumonitis at dose level 2. Delivered irinotecan dose intensity for dose level 1 was 27 mg/m2 per week; for dose level 2, it was 31.4 mg/m2 per week. Nine of 13 evaluable patients (69%) responded. At median potential follow-up of 5 years, 14 have progressed, and 11 have died. Projected median survival is 28 months; one patient who was treated for mediastinal node recurrence remains free from progression at 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin combined with radical TRT (63 Gy) is active and fairly well tolerated in locally advanced NSCLC. In combination with fixed-dose cisplatin (25 mg/m2 per week), the maximum-tolerated dose of irinotecan is 30 mg/m2 per week.

Induction cisplatin-irinotecan followed by concurrent cisplatin-irinotecan and radiotherapy without surgery in oesophageal cancer: multicenter phase II FFCD trial

A recent phase I study showed that weekly cisplatin, irinotecan and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered with moderate toxicity in patients with oesophageal cancer. Patients with no prior treatment and oesophageal cancer stage I to III, performance status <3, caloric intake >1500 kcal day⁻¹ were included. Chemotherapy, with cisplatin 30 mg m⁻² and irinotecan 60 mg m⁻², was administered at days 1, 8, 22, 29, and concurrently with radiotherapy at days 43, 50, 64 and 71. Radiotherapy was delivered with 50 or 50.4 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks. Forty-three patients were included, 10 stage I, 19 stage II and 14 stage III. Mean age was 59.2 years (range 44–79). A total of 30 out of 43 (69.8%) patients underwent all planned treatment. During induction chemotherapy, 14 severe toxicities of grade 3 or 4 in 10 patients (23.3%) were reported with 57.1% due to haematoxicity. During chemoradiotherapy, 31 severe toxicities of grade 3 or 4 with 64.5% due to haematotoxicity were reported in 18 patients. One toxic death occurred (diarrhoea grade 4). The complete clinical response rate was 58.1% (95% CI: 43.4–72.8%). Overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years was 62.8%, (95% CI, 58.3–77.3%) and 27.9% (95% CI, 13.4–41.3%), respectively. In conclusion, cisplatin–irinotecan–radiotherapy is an active and well-tolerated regimen feasible in out-patients.

Simultaneous chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in limited disease small cell lung cancer: A phase I study

INTRODUCTION

Early radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy appears to have prognostic benefits in patients with limited disease SCLC. Irinotecan/cisplatin have been shown to be superior to a standard treatment with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive disease SCLC. The present phase I study aims to assess the feasibility of irinotecan/cisplatin administered concurrently with radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients were treated concurrently with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (1.8-45 Gy + 9 Gy (RP)) and two cycles of irinotecan (40/50/60 mg/m2, Day 1/8/15, 29/36/43) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2, Days 1-3, 29-31), and four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy (CT). In addition, patients in complete remission (CR) received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any case grade III/IV non-hematological toxicity (esophagitis grade IV), grade IV leukopenia or grades III/IV thrombopenia (CTC) during RCT.

RESULTS

No DLT was observed; an irinotecan dose of 60 mg/m2 is recommended. 3/12 patients developed grade III leukopenia, one grade II pneumonitis. The predominant toxicity was esophagitis, grade II in 7/12 patients, grade III in 5/12. After RCT 7/12 patients were in CR, systemic progression was not observed during RCT.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent RCT with irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and cisplatin followed by four cycles of CT can be safely administered.

Enhancement of radiotherapy with DNA topoisomerase I-targeted drugs

Since its discovery more than a century ago, ionizing radiation has become a mainstay therapy for patients suffering from cancers. Currently, radiotherapy provides cure or palliative care for approximately one half of the cancer population. The anticancer efficacy of radiotherapy is, however, largely limited by its lack of tumor specificity and, consequently, normal tissue toxicity. There is an urgent need to develop systemic adjuncts that can enhance the efficacy and the selectivity of radiotherapy toward tumor cells. DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1)-targeted drugs such as camptothecin derivatives represent a novel class of chemotherapeutic agents that have recently been shown to be excellent radiation sensitizers. Combined modality therapy with TOP1-targeted drugs and radiotherapy represents a new promising cancer therapy. The mechanism of enhancement of radiotherapy by TOP1-targeted drugs is under intense investigation. Clinical trials using combinations of radiation and camptothecin derivatives are also currently ongoing in various solid tumors including brain, head and neck, and lung cancers. A better understanding of the radiosensitization (RS) mechanism of TOP1-targeted drugs is pivotal to their clinical application, as well as in guiding the development of better radiation sensitizers.

Basic treatment considerations: chemotherapy

Lung cancer represents a major global health problem, with more than a million deaths reported each year. Because there are no effective screening tools to date, diagnosis of the disease at an advanced stage is a common feature. Over the past 20 years, elegant strides have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Several novel chemotherapy agents that are efficacious and possess favorable toxicity profiles have been developed recently. In addition to evaluating novel combinations, alternative schedules to improve toxicity profiles are subjects of clinical trials. Much work needs to be done, however, to improve the outcome for patients with lung cancer. Chemotherapy extends life and improves quality of life for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Combined modality therapy with radiation and chemotherapy improves the outcome for patients with locally advanced NSCLC and is associated with a curative potential. Molecularly targeted therapies are under rigorous evaluation, although the initial results have been disappointing. In the upcoming years, we will learn effective means to incorporate molecularly targeted therapies to existing treatment paradigms in lung cancer.

Radiation and third-generation chemotherapy

All of the third-generation chemotherapeutic agents reviewed in this article are independently active against NSCLC, although the agents differ significantly in their cellular and molecular mechanisms of cytotoxicity. All have also been shown to potentiate radiation effects, and thus are promising in exerting further cytotoxicity when used in combination chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Although the toxicity to normal tissue varies among these agents when used alone, phase I/II clinical results consistently demonstrated higher risk and severity of esophagitis and pneumonitis when these agents were administered concurrently with thoracic radiation. These results were consistent with the radiosensitization properties of all these agents. Nonetheless, most chemoradiation combinations have been made feasible through careful phase I studies that establish safe doses of these agents given concurrently with radiation. Indeed, phase I outcomes consistently have demonstrated the need for dose reduction compared with doses applied in the stage IV, metastatic disease setting (see Tables 1 and 2). There have been many different dose schedules in phase I/II studies for stage III NSCLC, and most have yielded improved response rates with these agents. For all these agents discussed, multiagent chemoradiation increased toxicity when compared with single agent chemoradiation, particularly in the risk of neutropenia, and the tumor response rates were no better than single-agent chemoradiation. Most studies have not reached an adequate interval for survival endpoint to assess the impact on survival using multiagent chemoradiation. A few earlier studies using paclitaxel chemoradiation, in fact, showed that the significant improvement in tumor response rate resulted in only a small gain in survival outcome. Despite much preclinical research conducted with these agents, the optimal sequence and dose of drug and the optimal schedule for combining the two modalities remain unknown. Optimal sequencing of the chemoradiation regimens may improve distant disease control and primary tumor control, as was seen in studies that administered both full-dose induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation at reduced drug dose and in studies that administered consolidative, full-dose chemotherapy after chemoradiation. Strategically altering the treatment schedule may also enhance the radiosensitizing effects while keeping toxicity low, such as was seen in the pulsed low-dose paclitaxel chemoradiation reported by Chen et al . This pulsed low-dose schedule resulted in superior tumor response (100%) and durable primary tumor control while keeping the toxicity low. Other methods to minimize normal tissue injury and to deliver higher radiation doses, such as conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy that excludes nontarget tissues from the radiation field, are under investigation. Marks and colleagues were able to deliver radiation to 80 Gy using accelerated hyperfractionation radiation after induction chemotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is expected to revolutionize the targeting of tumor and exclusion of normal tissues from the high-dose radiation volume in the future. Integrating biologic response modifiers, radioprotectors, and molecular targeting strategies also are being investigated. It remains unclear which agent among the third-generation drugs performs better for combination chemoradiation. The CALGB 9431 study reported by Vokes et al provided some preliminary information, in that it was a randomized phase II study of a three-arm comparison of cisplatin-containing, two-drug combination chemoradiation with one of the third-generation agents. Although direct statistical comparison between the treatment arms was not valid for a phase II setting, such an analysis did indeed reveal similar overall response rates for these three arms. Chemoradiation using third-generation chemotherapeutic agents has improved local tumor response rates, with enhanced radiation toxicity such as esophagitis and pneumonitis. The challenge of targeting distant disease control for locally advanced NSCLC continues.

Preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) and concomitant CPT-11 in locally advanced rectal carcinoma: a phase I study

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma are at risk for both local recurrence and distant metastases. We demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART). In this Phase I trial, we aimed at introducing chemotherapy early in the treatment course with both intrinsic antitumor activity and a radiosensitizer effect.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-eight patients (19 males; median age 63, range 28-75) with advanced rectal carcinoma (cT3: 24; cT4: 4; cN+: 12; M1: 5) were enrolled, including 8 patients treated at the maximally tolerated dose. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (30-105 mg/m(2)/week) were given on Days 1, 8, and 15, and concomitant HART (41.6 Gy, 1.6 Gy bid x 13 days) started on Day 8. Surgery was to be performed within 1 week after the end of radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients completed all preoperative radiochemotherapy as scheduled; all patients underwent surgery. Dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea Grade 3 occurring at dose level 6 (105 mg/m(2)). Hematotoxicity was mild, with only 1 patient experiencing Grade 3 neutropenia. Postoperative complications (30 days) occurred in 7 patients, with an anastomotic leak rate of 22%.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase II dose of CPT-11 in this setting is 90 mg/m(2)/week. Further Phase II exploration at this dose is warranted.

Irinotecan Combined with Radiation Therapy for Patients with Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Trials

The prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor, with a high percentage of patients presenting with advanced disease and metastases. Thus, the therapeutic goal is to provide optimal local control and to eradicate any metastases. The advent of novel therapies has provided new hope in the treatment of this disease. Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is active in both chemotherapy-naive and previously treated NSCLC patients. In addition, its ability to act as a radiosensitizer makes it a promising candidate for use in combined modality therapy. Encouraging response rates have been achieved in multiple trials using irinotecan alone or in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, docetaxel, and/or radiotherapy. Further phase II and III studies should clarify the benefit of combined modality therapy as well as the optimal way to integrate radiotherapy into irinotecan regimens.

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this therapy. Four chemotherapy cycles of CPT-11 (days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (day 1) were repeated every 28 days. Radiotherapy of 2 Gy/day commenced on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle with 20 Gy administered from the first to the third cycles (a total of 60 Gy). 17 patients were enrolled at three dose levels (CPT-11/cisplatin: 40/60, 50/60 and 60/60 mg/m(2)), and 16 were evaluable for toxicity and outcome. 2 of 4 patients at 60/60 mg/m(2) refused continuation of therapy because of general fatigue, and the relative dose intensity of CPT-11 at 50/60 mg/m(2) was approximately 50%. These levels were considered as the MTD. Tumour responses included four complete responses (CR), 11 partial responses (PR) and one no change (NC), and the overall response rate was 93.8% (95% confidence interval: (CI) 71.7-98.9%). This combined modality is tolerable, and CPT-11/cisplatin of 40/60 mg/m(2) in this modality is recommended for phase II study.

Dose-escalation study of weekly irinotecan and daily carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and toxicity profile of weekly irinotecan with daily carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-one previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients received weekly irinotecan plus carboplatin (20 mg x m(-2) daily for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks and thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The irinotecan dose was escalated from 30 mg x m(-2) in increments of 10 mg x m(-2). Four irinotecan dose levels were given and 30 patients were assessable. Their median age was 62 years (range: 52-72 years), 28 had a performance status of 0-1 and two had a performance status of 2, 12 had stage IIIA disease and 18 had IIIB disease. There were 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 10 adenocarcinomas, and one large cell carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicities were pneumonitis, esophagitis, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 60 mg x m(-2), with two patients developing grade 4 pulmonary toxicity and one patient died of pneumonitis (grade 5). The recommended dose of irinotecan was 50 mg x m(-2). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were nausea and vomiting. Three patients achieved complete remission and 15 had partial remission, for an objective response rate of 60.0%. The median survival time was 14.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 51.6% and 34.2%, respectively. The study concluded that the major toxicity of this regimen was pneumonitis. This therapy may be active against unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and a phase II study is warranted.

Radiosensitization with chemotherapeutic agents

The combination of low-dose chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy is one of the treatments proposed in an attempt to improve the prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapeutic drugs administered at subtoxic doses act by means of a radiosensitization mechanism. Platinum-derived drugs have been historically used as radiosensitizers, without cumulative unacceptable toxicity. Many new chemotherapeutic agents, which have shown promising results in terms of disease control in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, show also a radiosensitizing activity. However, the optimal dose and timing of such drugs when used concurrently to radiotherapy are unknown. This paper will review the results obtained using new chemotherapeutic drugs as radiosensitizers.

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in unresectable and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this therapy. Two chemotherapy cycles of CPT-11 (days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (day 1) were repeated with a 28-day interval. Radiotherapy of 2 Gy/day commenced on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 24 Gy and 36 Gy administered for the first and second cycle, respectively. 24 eligible patients were enrolled at five dose levels (CPT-11/cisplatin: 40/60, 50/60, 60/60, 60/70 and 60/80 mg/m(2)), and 23 patients were evaluated for toxicity and clinical outcome. Only 1 patient experienced a DLT with neutropenia and diarrhoea at 60/60 mg/m(2). Dose escalation was limited to 60/80 mg/m(2) which was the recommended dose for CPT-11/cisplatin alone in NSCLC. Tumour responses included one complete response (CR), 15 partial response (PR), and 7 no change (NC), and the overall response rate was 69.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 47.1-86.8%). This combined modality is tolerable, and CPT-11/cisplatin of 60/80 mg/m(2) in this modality is recommended for phase II study.

Chemotherapy-induced pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer management

Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of therapy in many stages of lung cancer. Many diagnostic options have to be taken into account when a patient suffering from lung cancer presents with nonspecific, respiratory, clinical manifestations. A multidisciplinary diagnostic approach is then warranted. The top priority is to rule out those life-threatening causes, such as lung infection, that could be properly treated if a right diagnosis is early. To reach a definite diagnosis frequently requires that one or more diagnostic, pneumologic techniques are performed. Regarding to drug-induced pulmonary disease, prevention is mandatory. In this review we have tried to highlight the risk and characteristics of cytostatic-induced pulmonary toxicity caused by those agents that have been commonly employed to treat lung cancer for the last decades. When treating lung cancer patients, a high clinical suspicion of chemotherapy-induced lung toxicity should be kept in mind since an early withdrawal of the offending drug is the most efficacious therapy.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Combined Modality Therapy of Lung Cancer

Locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 30%-40% of all pulmonary malignancies. Despite the fact that the disease is confined to the chest, most patients will eventually succumb to their dis-ease. Therefore, the management of NSCLC is undergoing rapid evolution with hope of improving overall survival. The arrival of a new generation of chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes, gemcitabine, and topoisomerase inhibitors such as irinotecan and topotecan, offers the hope of real advances against this malignancy. Irinotecan and topotecan are camptothecin derivatives that are felt to exert their cytotoxic effects by targeting topoisomerase I. It is believed that topoisomerase I inhibitors stabilize a DNA-topoisomerase I cleavable complex, and interactions between this complex and the replication machinery may lead to cell death. There is a significant volume of in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating that these topoisomerase I inhibitors also act as radiosensitizers. Early clinical data with topotecan suggests that it is a more active agent in small-cell lung cancer than it is in NSCLC despite a common mechanism of action with irinotecan. With the increasing data that exist on the improved outcome with concurrent chemoradiation treatment for malignancies including lung cancer and head and neck cancers, there is an impetus to pursue the addition of other drugs that can radiosensitize tumors and further improve local control. Irinotecan is undergoing early clinical trials in the combined modality setting in several different disease sites. This paper will review the in vitro and in vivo data on the ability of irinotecan and topotecan to render tumors more susceptible to ionizing radiation. It will then focus on the experience with both drugs and thoracic radiation in the treatment of NSCLC, in which irinotecan has yielded acceptable toxicity results and response rates in excess of 60% in early trials. It is hoped that newer treatment strategies, such as the combination of radiation and topoisomerase I inhibitors in lung cancer, will have a significant impact on cure rates in the future.

Irinotecan (CPT-11): recent developments and future directions--colorectal cancer and beyond

Since its approval in the United States in 1996, irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar, Pharmacia Corp.; Peapack, NJ) has undergone extensive clinical evaluation. In the past five years, the focus of development has evolved from evaluation of single-agent activity in refractory disease settings to evaluation of front-line irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy regimens and integration of irinotecan into combined modality regimens. Important studies have been performed clarifying the role of irinotecan in treating colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, and a variety of other malignancies. Preclinical studies performed in conjunction with these clinical trials have also provided significant insights into the pharmacology, metabolism, mechanisms of resistance, and molecular determinants of response. This review summarizes that progress, focusing on the achievements of the past five years.

Preclinical and clinical trials of topoisomerase inhibitors

CPT-11, developed by Yakult Honsha, has achieved the position of standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in the United States and in Western countries because CPT-11 + 5FU + LV showed survival benefit compared with 5FU-LV in two randomized controlled trials. CPT-11 has been distributed to almost all countries. In Japan, combination therapy of CDDP + CPT-11 was significantly superior to CDDP-VP-16 in the treatment of extensive disease small cell lung cancer. This combination is also active against non-small cell lung cancer. Daiich Pharmaceutical Co. developed a more active nonmasked form of camptothecin derivative, DX-8915f. The phase I study of a new camptothecin inhibitor, DX-8915f, has just been completed. The new topoisomerase I inhibitors of indolocarbazol derivatives, NB-506 and J107088, developed by Banyu Co., have strong antitumor activity and a wide therapeutic ratio. The phase I trial of J107088 is currently ongoing in the United States and Japan. These do not show any cross-resistance to MDR drugs.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer remains a paradoxical entity to manage. Although this type of cancer is confined to the thorax and is ostensibly curable, most patients presenting at this stage of disease eventually succumb to it. The accepted therapy presently includes chemotherapy and radiation. The exact agents, schedules, and combinations need to be defined further, although cisplatin has become the widely viewed standard cytotoxic drug in this setting. Notwithstanding, newer chemotherapeutic and biologic agents are being extensively tested to find less toxic options with greater efficacy. Drugs that are gaining widespread approval include carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine. At the same time, advances in radiation therapy are triggering a revolution in dose intensity and scheduling that will one day offer superlative local control.