Histamine H1-receptor-mediated increase in the Ca2+ transient without a change in the Ca2+ current in electrically stimulated guinea-pig atrial myocytes

Initial Characterization of a Transgenic Mouse with Overexpression of the Human H1-Histamine Receptor on the Heart

There is a debate on whether H1-histamine receptors can alter contractility in the mammalian heart. We studied here a new transgenic mouse model where we increased genetically the cardiac level of the H1-histamine receptor. We wanted to know if histamine could augment or decrease contractile parameters in mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of human H1-histamine receptors (H1-TG) and compared these findings with those in littermate wild-type mice (WT). In H1-TG mice, we studied the presence of H1-histamine receptors by autoradiography of the atrium and ventricle using [3H]mepyramine. The messenger RNA for human H1-histamine receptors was present in the heart from H1-TG and absent from WT. Using in situ hybridization, we noted mRNA for the human H1-histamine receptor in cardiac cells from H1-TG. We noted that histamine (1 nM-10 µM) in paced (1 Hz) left atrial preparations from H1-TG, exerted at each concentration of histamine initially reduced force of contraction and then raised contractile force. Likewise, in spontaneously beating left atrial preparations from H1-TG, we noted that histamine led to a transient reduction in the spontaneous beating rate followed by an augmentation in the beating rate. The negative inotropic and chronotropic and the positive inotropic effects on histamine in isolated atrial muscle strips from H1-TG were attenuated by the H1-histamine receptor antagonist mepyramine. Histamine failed to exert an increased force or reduce the heartbeat in atrial preparations from WT. We concluded that stimulation of H1-histamine-receptors can decrease and then augment contractile force in the mammalian heart and stimulation of H1-histamine receptors exerts a negative chronotropic effect. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We made novel transgenic mice with cardiomyocyte-specific high expressional levels of the human H1-histamine receptor to contribute to the clarification of the controversy on whether H1-histamine receptors increase or decrease contractility and beating rate in the mammalian heart. From our data, we conclude that stimulation of H1-histamine receptors first decrease and then raise contractile force in the mammalian heart but exert solely negative chronotropic effects.

Function and Role of Histamine H1 Receptor in the Mammalian Heart

Histamine can change the force of cardiac contraction and alter the beating rate in mammals, including humans. However, striking species and regional differences have been observed. Depending on the species and the cardiac region (atrium versus ventricle) studied, the contractile, chronotropic, dromotropic, and bathmotropic effects of histamine vary. Histamine is present and is produced in the mammalian heart. Thus, histamine may exert autocrine or paracrine effects in the mammalian heart. Histamine uses at least four heptahelical receptors: H₁, H₂, H₃ and H₄. Depending on the species and region studied, cardiomyocytes express only histamine H₁ or only histamine H₂ receptors or both. These receptors are not necessarily functional concerning contractility. We have considerable knowledge of the cardiac expression and function of histamine H₂ receptors. In contrast, we have a poor understanding of the cardiac role of the histamine H₁ receptor. Therefore, we address the structure, signal transduction, and expressional regulation of the histamine H₁ receptor with an eye on its cardiac role. We point out signal transduction and the role of the histamine H₁ receptor in various animal species. This review aims to identify gaps in our knowledge of cardiac histamine H₁ receptors. We highlight where the published research shows disagreements and requires a new approach. Moreover, we show that diseases alter the expression and functional effects of histamine H₁ receptors in the heart. We found that antidepressive drugs and neuroleptic drugs might act as antagonists of cardiac histamine H₁ receptors, and believe that histamine H₁ receptors in the heart might be attractive targets for drug therapy. The authors believe that a better understanding of the role of histamine H₁ receptors in the human heart might be clinically relevant for improving drug therapy.

Myocardial toxicity induced by silica nanoparticles in a transcriptome profile

The deleterious effects of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) on human health and the ecological system have gradually gained attention owing to their heavy annual output and extensive global flux. The updated epidemiological or experimental investigations have demonstrated the potential myocardial toxicity triggered by SiNPs, but the underlying mechanisms and long-lasting cardiac effects are still poorly understood. Here, a rat model of sub-chronic respiratory exposure to SiNPs was conducted, and the histopathological analysis and ultrastructural investigation of heart tissues were carried out. More importantly, a comprehensive analysis of whole-genome transcription was utilized in rat heart to uncover key biological and cellular mechanisms triggered by SiNPs. The widening of myocardial space and partial fiber rupture were clearly manifested in rat heart after prolonged SiNPs exposure, particularly accompanied by mitochondrial swelling and cristae rupture. With the aid of Affymetrix GeneChips, 3153 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified after SiNPs exposure, including 1916 down- and 1237 up-regulated genes. GO and KEGG analysis illustrated many important biological processes and pathways perturbed by SiNPs, mainly specializing in cellular stress, energy metabolism, actin filament dynamics and immune response. Signal-net analysis revealed that Prkaca (PKA) plays a core role in the cardiac toxification process of prolonged exposure of SiNPs to rats. Furthermore, qRT-PCR verified that PKA-mediated calcium signaling is probably responsible for SiNPs-induced cardiac injury. Conclusively, our study revealed that SiNPs caused myocardial injury, and particularly, provided transcriptomic insight into the role of PKA-calcium signaling triggered by SiNPs, which would facilitate SiNPs-based nanosafety assessment and biomedicine development.

The Roles of Cardiovascular H2-Histamine Receptors Under Normal and Pathophysiological Conditions

This review addresses pharmacological, structural and functional relationships among H₂-histamine receptors and H₁-histamine receptors in the mammalian heart. The role of both receptors in the regulation of force and rhythm, including their electrophysiological effects on the mammalian heart, will then be discussed in context. The potential clinical role of cardiac H₂-histamine-receptors in cardiac diseases will be examined. The use of H₂-histamine receptor agonists to acutely increase the force of contraction will be discussed. Special attention will be paid to the potential role of cardiac H₂-histamine receptors in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, novel findings on the putative role of H₂-histamine receptor antagonists in treating chronic heart failure in animal models and patients will be reviewed. Some limitations in our biochemical understanding of the cardiac role of H₂-histamine receptors will be discussed. Recommendations for further basic and translational research on cardiac H₂-histamine receptors will be offered. We will speculate whether new knowledge might lead to novel roles of H₂-histamine receptors in cardiac disease and whether cardiomyocyte specific H₂-histamine receptor agonists and antagonists should be developed.

Mechanisms of Nausea and Vomiting: Current Knowledge and Recent Advances in Intracellular Emetic Signaling Systems

Nausea and vomiting are common gastrointestinal complaints that can be triggered by diverse emetic stimuli through central and/or peripheral nervous systems. Both nausea and vomiting are considered as defense mechanisms when threatening toxins/drugs/bacteria/viruses/fungi enter the body either via the enteral (e.g., the gastrointestinal tract) or parenteral routes, including the blood, skin, and respiratory systems. While vomiting is the act of forceful removal of gastrointestinal contents, nausea is believed to be a subjective sensation that is more difficult to study in nonhuman species. In this review, the authors discuss the anatomical structures, neurotransmitters/mediators, and corresponding receptors, as well as intracellular emetic signaling pathways involved in the processes of nausea and vomiting in diverse animal models as well as humans. While blockade of emetic receptors in the prevention of vomiting is fairly well understood, the potential of new classes of antiemetics altering postreceptor signal transduction mechanisms is currently evolving, which is also reviewed. Finally, future directions within the field will be discussed in terms of important questions that remain to be resolved and advances in technology that may help provide potential answers.

Broad-spectrum antiemetic potential of the L-type calcium channel antagonist nifedipine and evidence for its additive antiemetic interaction with the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist palonosetron in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva)

Cisplatin-like chemotherapeutics cause vomiting via release of multiple neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin (5-HT), or substance P (SP)) from the gastrointestinal enterochromaffin cells and/or the brainstem via a calcium dependent process. Diverse channels in the plasma membrane allow extracellular Ca(2+) entry into cells for the transmitter release process. Agonists of 5-HT3 receptors increase calcium influx through both 5-HT3 receptors and L-type Ca(2+) channels. We envisaged that L-type calcium agonists such as FPL 64176 should cause vomiting and corresponding antagonists such as nifedipine would behave as broad-spectrum antiemetics. Administration of FPL 64176 did cause vomiting in the least shrew in a dose-dependent fashion. Nifedipine and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist palonosetron, potently suppressed FPL 64176-induced vomiting, while a combination of ineffective doses of these antagonists was more efficacious. Subsequently, we investigated the broad-spectrum antiemetic potential of nifedipine against diverse emetogens including agonists of serotonergic 5-HT3- (e.g. 5-HT or 2-Me-5-HT), SP tachykinin NK1- (GR73632), dopamine D2- (apomorphine or quinpirole), and cholinergic M1- (McN-A-343) receptors, as well as the non-specific emetogen, cisplatin. Nifedipine by itself suppressed vomiting in a potent and dose-dependent manner caused by the above emetogens except cisplatin. Moreover, low doses of nifedipine potentiated the antiemetic efficacy of non-effective or semi-effective doses of palonosetron against vomiting caused by either 2-Me-5-HT or cisplatin. Thus, our findings demonstrate that activation of L-type calcium channels causes vomiting, whereas blockade of these ion channels by nifedipine-like antagonists not only provides broad-spectrum antiemetic activity but can also potentiate the antiemetic efficacy of well-established antiemetics such as palonosetron. L-type calcium channel antagonists should also provide antiemetic activity against drug-induced vomiting as well as other emetogens including bacterial and viral proteins.

Cardiac adrenergic control and atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and it causes substantial mortality. The autonomic nervous system, and particularly the adrenergic/cholinergic balance, has a profound influence on the occurrence of AF. Adrenergic stimulation from catecholamines can cause AF in patients. In human atrium, catecholamines can affect each of the electrophysiological mechanisms of AF initiation and/or maintenance. Catecholamines may produce membrane potential oscillations characteristic of afterdepolarisations, by increasing Ca(2+) current, [Ca(2+)](i) and consequent Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchange, and may also enhance automaticity. Catecholamines might affect reentry, by altering excitability or conduction, rather than action potential terminal repolarisation or refractory period. However, which arrhythmia mechanisms predominate is unclear, and likely depends on cardiac pathology and adrenergic tone. Heart failure (HF), a major cause of AF, causes adrenergic activation and adaptational changes, remodelling, of atrial electrophysiology, Ca(2+) homeostasis, and adrenergic responses. Chronic AF also remodels these, but differently to HF. Myocardial infarction and AF cause neural remodelling that also may promote AF. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) are used in the treatment of AF, mainly to control the ventricular rate, by slowing atrioventricular conduction. beta-Blockers also reduce the incidence of AF, particularly in HF or after cardiac surgery, when adrenergic tone is high. Furthermore, the chronic treatment of patients with beta-blockers remodels the atria, with a potentially antiarrhythmic increase in the refractory period. Therefore, the suppression of AF by beta-blocker treatment may involve an attenuation of arrhythmic activity that is caused by increased [Ca(2+)](i), coupled with effects of adaptation to the treatment. An improved understanding of the involvement of the adrenergic system and its control in basic mechanisms of AF under differing cardiac pathologies might lead to better treatments.

Involvement of tyrosine phosphorylation in the positive inotropic effect produced by H(1)-receptors with histamine in guinea-pig left atrium

We investigated the effect of stimulation of H(1)-receptors with histamine on protein tyrosine phosphorylation levels in guinea-pig left atrium and evaluated the influences of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on the positive inotropic effect mediated by H(1)-receptors in this tissue. Histamine induced an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation in four main clusters of proteins with apparent molecular weights of 25, 35, 65 and 150 kDa. Tyrosine phosphorylation of these proteins attained a peak around 2 - 3 min following histamine stimulation and then declined to or below basal levels. Histamine-induced protein tyrosine phosphorylation was antagonized by the H(1)-receptor antagonists mepyramine (1 microM) and chlorpheniramine (1 microM), but not by the H(2)-receptor antagonist cimetidine (10 microM). The positive inotropic effect of histamine was depressed in a concentration-dependent manner by the tyrosine kinase inhibitors tyrphostin A25 (50 to 100 microM) and genistein (10 to 50 microM) but not by the inactive genistein analogue daidzein (50 microM). The positive inotropic effect of isoprenaline was unchanged by tyrphostin A25 and genistein. At a concentration of 1 microM histamine produced a dual-component positive inotropic response composed of an initial increasing phase and a second and late developing, greater positive inotropic phase. Treatment with tyrphostin A25 (100 microM) and genistein (50 microM), but not daidzein (50 microM), significantly attenuated the two components of the inotropic response, although genistein suppressed the initial component more markedly than the late component. We conclude that increased protein tyrosine phosphorylation may play an important role in initiating at least some part of the positive inotropic effect of H(1)-receptor stimulation in guinea-pig left atrium.

Histamine H1-receptor-mediated modulation of the delayed rectifier K+ current in guinea-pig atrial cells: opposite effects on IKs and IKr

1. Histamine receptor-mediated modulation of the rapid and slow components of the delayed rectifier K+ current (IK) was investigated in enzymatically-dissociated atrial cells of guinea-pigs using the whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique. 2. Histamine at a concentration of 10 microM enhanced IK recorded during strong depolarization to potentials ranging from +20 to +40 mV and inhibited IK recorded during mild depolarization to potentials ranging from -20 to -10 mV. The increase of IK was more prominent with longer depolarizing pulses, whereas the inhibition of IK was more marked with shorter depolarizing pulses, suggesting that histamine enhances IKs (the slow component of IK) and inhibits IKr (the rapid component of IK). 3. The histamine-induced enhancement of IKs and inhibition of IKr were abolished by 3 microM chlorpheniramine but not by 10 microM cimetidine, suggesting that these opposite effects of histamine on IKr and IKs are mediated by H1-receptors. 4. In the presence of 5 microM E-4031, an IKr blocker, histamine hardly affected IK during mild depolarization although it enhanced IK during strong depolarization in a concentration-dependent manner. Histamine increased IKs with EC50 value of 0.7 microM. In the presence of 300 microM indapamide, an IKs blocker, histamine hardly affected IKs but inhibited IKr in a concentration-dependent manner. Histamine decreased IKr with IC50 value of 0.3 microM. 5. Pretreatment with 100 nM calphostin C or 30 nM staurosporine, protein kinase C inhibitors, abolished the histamine-induced enhancement of IKs, but failed to affect the histamine-induced inhibition of IKr. 6. We conclude that in guinea-pig atrial cells H1-receptor stimulation enhances IKs and inhibits IKr through different intracellular mechanisms.