Norman C, Grimond-Billa SK, Bennett GW, Cassaday HJ. A neurotensin agonist and antagonist decrease and increase activity, respectively, but do not preclude discrete cue conditioning.
J Psychopharmacol 2010;
24:373-81. [PMID:
18838494 DOI:
10.1177/0269881108097721]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There is evidence to suggest that neurotensin (NT) may enhance cognitive function. For example, in aversive trace conditioning, the NT agonist PD149163 selectively increased trace conditioning (Grimond-Billa, et al., 2008). The present study, therefore, examined the role of NT in associative learning, tested using an appetitive trace conditioning procedure (0-s or 10-s inter-stimulus-interval [ISI]) with a mixed frequency noise as a conditioned stimulus (CS) and food delivery as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). The effects of an NT agonist (PD149163, 0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg, Experiment 1) and an NT antagonist (SR142948A, 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg, Experiment 2) were compared. To take nonspecific effects of these compounds into account, conditioning to the CS was measured as a percentage of total responding, during UCS deliveries and in the inter-trial-interval (ITI). In both experiments, associative learning to the contiguously (0-s) presented CS was demonstrated, although there was a relative reduction in this learning under 0.125 mg/kg PD149163. Counter to prediction, the only effect on trace conditioning was some overall reduction in responding to the CS in the 10-s group conditioned under 0.25 mg/kg PD149163. The NT antagonist was without any effect on appetitive conditioning. However, these NT compounds were not ineffective: decreases and increases in responding in the ITI, ISI and during UCS deliveries seen under PD149163 and SR142948A were dissociable from effects on discrete cue conditioning.
Collapse