The human GABA(B1b) and GABA(B2) heterodimeric recombinant receptor shows low sensitivity to phaclofen and saclofen

The β-cell primary cilium is an autonomous Ca2+ compartment for paracrine GABA signaling

The primary cilium is an organelle present in most adult mammalian cells that is considered as an antenna for sensing the local microenvironment. Here, we use intact mouse pancreatic islets of Langerhans to investigate signaling properties of the primary cilium in insulin-secreting β-cells. We find that GABAB1 receptors are strongly enriched at the base of the cilium, but are mobilized to more distal locations upon agonist binding. Using cilia-targeted Ca2+ indicators, we find that activation of GABAB1 receptors induces selective Ca2+ influx into primary cilia through a mechanism that requires voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel activation. Islet β-cells utilize cytosolic Ca2+ increases as the main trigger for insulin secretion, yet we find that increases in cytosolic Ca2+ fail to propagate into the cilium, and that this isolation is largely due to enhanced Ca2+ extrusion in the cilium. Our work reveals local GABA action on primary cilia that involves Ca2+ influx and depends on restricted Ca2+ diffusion between the cilium and cytosol.

Optimization and pharmacological characterization of receptor-mediated Gi/o activation in postmortem human prefrontal cortex

The biochemical abnormalities in transmembrane signal transduction mediated through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been postulated as underlying pathophysiology of psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia and mood disorders. In the present study, the experimental conditions of agonist-induced [35 S]GTPγS binding in postmortem human brain membranes were optimized, and the responses induced by a series of agonists were pharmacologically characterized. The [35 S]GTPγS binding assay was performed in postmortem human prefrontal cortical membranes by means of filtration techniques, and standardized as to GDP concentration, membrane protein content, MgCl2 and NaCl concentrations in assay buffer, incubation period and effect of white matter contamination. Under the standard assay conditions, the specific [35 S]GTPγS binding was stimulated by the addition of 15 compounds in a concentration-dependent manner. Of these agonists, R(+)-8-OH-DPAT, UK-14,304, DAMGO and DPDPE showed apparently biphasic concentration-response curves. As for these four responses, only higher-potency site was pharmacologically characterized. The receptors involved in the responses investigated were 5-HT1A receptor (probed with R(+)-8-OH-DPAT or 5-HT), α2A -adrenoceptor (UK-14,304 or (-)-epinephrine), M2 /M4 mAChRs (carbachol), adenosine A1 receptor (adenosine), histamine H3 receptor (histamine), group II mGlu (l-glutamate), GABAB receptor (baclofen), μ-opioid receptor (DAMGO or endomophin-1), δ-opioid receptor (DPDPE or SNC-80) and NOP (nociceptin). Although dopamine also activated specific [35 S]GTPγS binding, this response was likely mediated via α2A -adrenoceptor, but not dopamine receptor subtypes. The present study provides us with fundamental aspects of the strategy for elucidation of probable abnormalities of neural signalling mediated by G proteins activated through multiple GPCRs in the brain of psychiatric patients.

Evaluation of FLIPR Calcium 3 Assay Kit—A New No-Wash Fluorescence Calcium Indicator Reagent

We have evaluated the FLIPR Calcium 3 Assay Kit (Calcium 3), a new no-wash fluorescence calcium indicator dye reagent, for the measurement of agonist-stimulated calcium signaling in cells expressing the serotonin 2C (5-HT2C), metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) and the vasopressin 2 (V2) G-protein-coupled receptors. Calcium 3 yielded equivalent (5-HT2C) or superior (mGluR5 and V2) sensitivity to FLUO-4 as indexed by the change in fluorescence counts following agonist application. Assay variability, indexed by CV, using Calcium 3 or FLUO-4 was equivalent with 5-HT2Creceptor responses although CVs were reduced using Calcium 3 in the examples of the mGluR5 and V2 receptors. Receptor pharmacologies based on agonist EC50values were identical when either Calcium 3 or FLUO-4 were utilized. Our results validate Calcium 3 as a compel-ling alternative to FLUO-4 in the choice of fluorescent dye reagent for studying G-protein-coupled receptors, providing the advantage of a homogenous, no-wash assay format. ( Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003:571-577)

Antistress Effects of Rosa rugosa Thunb. on Total Sleep Deprivation-Induced Anxiety-Like Behavior and Cognitive Dysfunction in Rat: Possible Mechanism of Action of 5-HT6 Receptor Antagonist

Our previous results suggest that the Rosa rugosa Thunb. (family Rosaceae) alleviates endurance exercise-induced stress by decreasing oxidative stress levels. This study aimed to screen and identify the physiological antistress effects of an extract of R. rugosa (RO) on sleep deprivation-induced anxiety-like behavior and cognitive tests (in vivo) and tested for hippocampal CORT and monoamine levels (ex vivo), corticosterone (CORT)-induced injury, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, and serotonin 6 (5-hydroxytryptamine 6, 5-HT6) receptor activities (in vitro) in search of active principles and underlying mechanisms of action. We confirmed the antistress effects of RO in a sleep-deprived stress model in rat and explored the underlying mechanisms of its action. In conclusion, an R. rugosa extract showed efficacy and potential for use as an antistress therapy to treat sleep deprivation through its antagonism of the 5-HT6 receptor and resulting inhibition of cAMP activity.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets. It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.

Chimeric G proteins in fluorimetric calcium assays: experience with opioid receptors

High throughput calcium mobilization assays are extensively used for pharmacological characterization of GPCR ligands. These approaches, initially developed for G(q)-coupled receptors, can be extended to G(i) coupled GPCRs using chimeric G proteins. Here we used the Gα(qi5) protein to force the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide (NOP) receptor, as well as the classical opioid receptors to signal through the PLC-IP(3)-Ca(2+) pathway in CHO cells. Calcium levels were monitored using the fluorometric imaging plate reader FlexStation II and the Ca(2+) dye Fluo 4 AM. For investigating the pharmacology of the NOP receptor a panel of full and partial agonists and antagonists were assessed, while a small panel of agonists and antagonists was used for evaluating the pharmacological profile of opioid receptors. Some limitations of this assay and differences in the results obtained in comparison with those with G(i) based biochemical assays are described. Overall, the present results confirm that the chimeric G protein strategy is useful for studying the pharmacological activity of G(i) coupled receptor ligands and that the aberrant signaling does not produce any measurable change in the pharmacological profile of the receptor under study. Thus, this G protein strategy is extremely useful for setting up primary screening assays for NOP and classical opioid receptors and likely for other members of the GPCR family.

A fluorescent ligand-binding alternative using Tag-lite® technology

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are crucial cell surface receptors that transmit signals from a wide range of extracellular ligands. Indeed, 40% to 50% of all marketed drugs are thought to modulate GPCR activity, making them the major class of targets in the drug discovery process. Binding assays are widely used to identify high-affinity, selective, and potent GPCR drugs. In this field, the use of radiolabeled ligands has remained so far the gold-standard method. Here the authors report a less hazardous alternative for high-throughput screening (HTS) applications by the setup of a nonradioactive fluorescence-based technology named Tag-lite(®). Selective binding of various fluorescent ligands, either peptidic or not, covering a large panel of GPCRs from different classes is illustrated, particularly for chemokine (CXCR4), opioid (δ, µ, and κ), and cholecystokinin (CCK1 and CCK2) receptors. Affinity constants of well-known pharmacological agents of numerous GPCRs are in line with values published in the literature. The authors clearly demonstrate that the Tag-lite binding assay format can be successfully and reproducibly applied by using different cellular materials such as transient or stable recombinant cells lines expressing SNAP-tagged GPCR. Such fluorescent-based binding assays can be performed with adherent cells or cells in suspension, in 96- or 384-well plates. Altogether, this new technology offers great advantages in terms of flexibility, rapidity, and user-friendliness; allows easy miniaturization; and makes it completely suitable for HTS applications.

Reciprocal inhibition of G-protein signaling is induced by CB(1) cannabinoid and GABA(B) receptor interactions in rat hippocampal membranes

Cannabinoid CB(1) and the metabotropic GABA(B) receptors have been shown to display similar pharmacological effects and co-localization in certain brain regions. Previous studies have reported a functional link between the two systems. As a first step to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism, here we show cross-inhibition of G-protein signaling between GABA(B) and CB(1) receptors in rat hippocampal membranes. The CB(1) agonist R-Win55,212-2 displayed high potency and efficacy in stimulating guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate, [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Its effect was completely blocked by the specific CB(1) antagonist AM251 suggesting that the signaling was via CB(1) receptors. The GABA(B) agonists baclofen and SKF97541 also elevated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding by about 60%, with potency values in the micromolar range. Phaclofen behaved as a low potency antagonist with an ED(50) approximately 1mM. However, phaclofen at low doses (1 and 10nM) slightly but significantly attenuated maximal stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding by the CB(1) agonist R-Win55,212-2. The observation that higher concentrations of phaclofen had no such effect rule out the possibility of its direct action on CB(1) receptors. The pharmacologically inactive stereoisomer S-Win55,212-3 had no effect either alone or in combination with phaclofen establishing that the interaction is stereospecific in hippocampus. The specific CB(1) antagonist AM251 at a low dose (1 nM) also inhibited the efficacy of G-protein signaling of the GABA(B) receptor agonist SKF97541. Cross-talk of the two receptor systems was not detected in either spinal cord or cerebral cortex membranes. It is speculated that the interaction might occur via an allosteric interaction between a subset of GABA(B) and CB(1) receptors in rat hippocampal membranes. Although the exact molecular mechanism of the reciprocal inhibition between CB(1) and GABA(B) receptors will have to be explored by future studies it is intriguing that the cross-talk might be involved in balance tuning the endocannabinoid and GABAergic signaling in hippocampus.

GABAB heterodimeric receptors promote Ca2+ influx via store-operated channels in rat cortical neurons and transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells

The GABAB receptors are generally considered to be classical Gi-coupled receptors that lack the ability to mobilize intracellular Ca2+ without the aid of promiscuous G proteins. Here, we report the ability of GABAB receptors to promote calcium influx into primary cultures of rat cortical neurons and transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells were transfected with GABAB1(a) or GABAB1(b) subunits along with GABAB2 subunits. In experiments using the fluorometric imaging plate reader platform, GABA and selective agonists promoted increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells and cortical neurons with the expected order of potency. These effects were fully antagonized by selective GABAB receptor antagonists. To investigate the intracellular pathways responsible for mediating these effects we employed several pharmacological inhibitors. Pertussis toxin abolished GABAB mediated Ca2+ increases, as did the phospholipase Cbeta inhibitor U73122. Inhibitor 2-aminethoxydiphenyl borane acts as an antagonist at inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors and at store-operated channels. In all cell types, 2-aminethoxydiphenyl borane prevented Ca2+ mobilization. The selective store-operated channel inhibitor 1-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propoxy]ethyl-1H-imidazole hydrochloride prevented increases in intracellular Ca2+ levels as did performing the assays in Ca2+ free buffers. In conclusion, GABAB receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and endogenously expressed in rat cortical neurons promote Ca2+ entry into the cell via the activation of store-operated channels, using a mechanism that is dependent on Gi/o heterotrimeric proteins and phospholipase Cbeta. These findings suggest that the neuronal effects mediated by GABAB receptors may, in part, rely on the receptor's ability to promote Ca2+ influx.

Does gabapentin act as an agonist at native GABAB receptors?

Gabapentin, a novel anticonvulsant and analgesic, is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue but was shown initially to have little affinity at GABA(A) or GABA(B) receptors. It was recently reported to be a selective agonist at GABA(B) receptors containing GABA(B1a)-GABA(B2) heterodimers, although several subsequent studies disproved that conclusion. In the present study, we examined whether gabapentin is an agonist at native GABA(B) receptors using a rat model of postoperative pain in vivo and periaqueductal gray (PAG) slices in vitro; PAG contains GABA(B) receptors, and their activation results in antinociception. An intrathecal injection of gabapentin or baclofen, a GABA(B) receptor agonist, induced antiallodynia in this postoperative pain model. Intrathecal injection of GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP 35348 and CGP 55845 antagonized baclofen- but not gabapentin-induced antiallodynia. In ventrolateral PAG neurons, baclofen activated G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels in a manner blocked by CGP 35348 or CGP 55845. However, gabapentin displayed no effect on the membrane current. In neurons unaffected by gabapentin, baclofen activated GIRK channels through GABA(B) receptors. It is concluded that gabapentin is not an agonist at GABA(B) receptors that are functional in baclofen-induced antiallodynia in the postoperative pain model in vivo and in GIRK channel activation in ventrolateral PAG neurons in vitro.

Gabapentin actions on Kir3 currents and N-type Ca2+ channels via GABAB receptors in hippocampal pyramidal cells

Gabapentin is a clinically effective anticonvulsant with an unclear mechanism of action. It was described as a GABA(B(1a,2)) receptor subtype-selective agonist, activating postsynaptic K(+) currents and inhibiting postsynaptic Ca(2+) channels in CA1 pyramidal cells, but without presynaptic actions. These activities appeared controversial and we therefore sought to further clarify gabapentin actions in rat hippocampal slices by characterizing K(+) currents and Ca(2+) channels targeted by gabapentin using whole-cell recording and multiphoton Ca(2+) imaging. 1) We found that gabapentin and baclofen induced inwardly rectifying K(+) currents (K(Gbp) and K(Bac), respectively), sensitive to Ba(2+) and Cs(+). 2) A constitutively active K(IR) current, independent of GABA(B) receptor activation and sensitive to Ba(2+) and Cs(+) was also present. 3) K(Gbp), K(Bac), and K(IR) currents showed some differences in sensitivity to Ba(2+) and Cs(+), indicating the possible activation of distinct Kir3 currents, independent of K(IR), by gabapentin and baclofen. 4) Gabapentin inhibition of Ca(2+) channels was abolished by omega-conotoxin GVIA, but not by omega-agatoxin IVA and nimodipine, indicating a predominant action of gabapentin on N-type Ca(2+) channels. 5) Gabapentin actions were linked to activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins since N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) blocked K(Gbp) activation and Ca(2+) channel inhibition by gabapentin. 6) Finally, gabapentin reduced epileptiform discharges in slices via GABA(B) receptor activation. The anticonvulsant actions of gabapentin in hippocampal cells may thus involve GABA(B) receptor coupling to G-proteins and modulation of Kir3 and N-type Ca(2+) channels. Moreover, gabapentin and baclofen activation of GABA(B) receptors may couple to distinct cellular targets.

Characterization of the 5-HT6 receptor coupled to Ca2+ signaling using an enabling chimeric G-protein

We examined the feasibility of coupling the 5-HT(6) receptor to a Ca(2+) signaling read-out using a chimeric G-protein, comprising of G(alphaq) with the C-terminal five amino acids from G(alphas), to facilitate assays on the fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR). Using a transient transfection assay in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, Ca(2+) signaling in response to serotonin (5-HT) was facilitated by co-transfection of the 5-HT(6) receptor with the G(alphaq)/G(alphas) chimera, but not with the 5-HT(6) receptor alone or with a similar chimera incorporating the C-terminal five amino acids of G(alphai3). A series of agonist concentration-response curves were constructed using the 5-HT(6)-G(alphaq)/G(alphas) signaling assay generating the following rank order of agonist potency; 5-methoxytryptamine (EC(50), 9 nM)=5-HT (12 nM)=2-methyl 5-HT (13 nM)>tryptamine (86 nM)=5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) (119 nM)>>lisuride (>1 microM). In comparison, essentially identical EC(50) values were observed for the stimulation of cAMP accumulation with the same compounds; 5-methoxytryptamine (EC(50), 6 nM)=5-HT (6 nM)=2-methyl 5-HT (15 nM)>tryptamine (91 nM)=5-CT (153 nM)>lisuride (>350 nM). Clozapine and SB 271046 both produced a concentration-dependent antagonism of the 5-HT-stimulated Ca(2+) response with IC(50) values of 45 and 11 nM, respectively. In contrast, aripiprazole, a recently launched atypical anti-psychotic with a novel mechanism of action described as a dopamine/serotonin stabilizer, was essentially devoid of 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist activity. Our results demonstrate that a FLIPR-based Ca(2+) signaling assay is a feasible approach to the functional characterization of 5-HT(6) receptor ligands. Moreover, the equivalent coupling efficiency, as indexed by agonist potency, observed using this system compared with the native coupling assay to cAMP suggests that the C-terminal five amino acids of G(alphas) are the major determinant for the receptor/G-protein interaction of the 5-HT(6) receptor subtype.

Pharmacological characterisation of a cell line expressing GABA B1b and GABA B2 receptor subunits

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptor has been shown to be a heterodimer consisting of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). We have stably co-expressed these two subunits in a CHO cell line, characterised its pharmacology and compared it to the native receptor in rat brain membranes. Radioligand binding using [3H]CGP54626A demonstrated a similar rank order of potency between recombinant and native receptors: CGP62349>CGP54626A>SCH 50911>3-aminopropylphosphinicacid(3-APPA)>GABA>baclofen>saclofen>phaclofen. However, differences were observed in the affinity of agonists, which were higher at the native receptor, suggesting that in the recombinant system a large number of the receptors were in the low agonist affinity state. In contrast, [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies did not show any differences between recombinant and native receptors with the full agonists GABA and 3-APPA. Measurement of cAMP accumulation in the cells revealed a degree of endogenous coupling of the receptors to G-proteins. This is most likely to be due to the high expression levels of receptors (B(max)=22.5+/-2.5pmol/mg protein) in this experimental system. There was no evidence of GABA(B2) receptors, when expressed alone, binding [3H]CGP54626A, [3H]GABA, [3H]3-APPA nor of GABA having any effect on basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding or cAMP levels.

Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel GABAB-related G-protein coupled receptor

Using a homology-based bioinformatics approach we have analysed human genomic sequence and identified the human and rodent orthologues of a novel putative seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, termed GABA(BL). The amino acid sequence homology of these cDNAs compared to GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) led us to postulate that GABA(BL) was a putative novel GABA(B) receptor subunit. The C-terminal sequence of GABA(BL) contained a putative coiled-coil domain, di-leucine and several RXR(R) ER retention motifs, all of which have been shown to be critical in GABA(B) receptor subunit function. In addition, the distribution of GABA(BL) in the central nervous system was reminiscent of that of the other known GABA(B) subunits. However, we were unable to detect receptor function in response to any GABA(B) ligands when GABA(BL) was expressed in isolation or in the presence of either GABA(B1) or GABA(B2). Therefore, if GABA(BL) is indeed a GABA(B) receptor subunit, its partner is a potentially novel receptor subunit or chaperone protein which has yet to be identified.

Galpha(16/z) chimeras efficiently link a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors to calcium mobilization

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a class of important therapeutic targets for drug discovery. The integration of GPCRs into contemporary high-throughput functional assays is critically dependent on the presence of appropriate G proteins. Given that different GPCRs can discriminate against distinct G proteins, a universal G protein adapter is extremely desirable. In this report, the authors evaluated two highly promiscuous Galpha(16/z) chimeras, 16z25 and 16z44, for their ability to translate GPCR activation into Ca(2+) mobilization using the fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) and aequorin. A panel of 24 G(s)- or G(i)-coupled receptors was examined for their functional association with the Galpha(16/z) chimeras. Although most of the GPCRs tested were incapable of inducing Ca(2+) mobilization upon their activation by specific agonists, the introduction of 16z25 or 16z44 allowed all of these GPCRs to mediate agonist-induced Ca(2+) mobilization. In contrast, only 16 of the GPCRs tested were capable of using Galpha(16) to mobilize intracellular Ca(2+). Analysis of dose-response curves obtained with the delta-opioid, dopamine D(1), and Xenopus melatonin Mel1c receptors revealed that the Galpha(16/z) chimeras possess better sensitivity than Galpha(16) in both the FLIPR and aequorin assays. Collectively, these studies help to validate the promiscuity of the Galpha(16/z) chimeras as well as their application in contemporary drug-screening assays that are based on ligand-induced Ca(2+) mobilization.

GABA and development of the Xenopus optic projection

In the developing visual system of Xenopus laevis retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons extend through the brain towards their major target in the midbrain, the optic tectum. Enroute, the axons are guided along their pathway by cues in the environment. In vitro, neurotransmitters have been shown to act chemotropically to influence the trajectory of extending axons and regulate the outgrowth of developing neurites, suggesting that they may act to guide or modulate the growth of axons in vivo. Previous work by Roberts and colleagues (1987) showed that populations of cells within the developing Xenopus diencephalon and mid-brain express the neurotransmitter gamma amino butyric acid (GABA). Here we show that Xenopus RGC axons in the midoptic tract grow alongside the GABAergic cells and cross their GABA immunopositive nerve processes. Moreover, RGC axons and growth cones express GABA-A and GABA-B receptors, and GABA and the GABA-B receptor agonist baclofen both stimulate RGC neurite outgrowth in culture. Finally, the GABA-B receptor antagonist CGP54626 applied to the developing optic projection in vivo causes a dose-dependent shortening of the optic projection. These data indicate that GABA may act in vivo to stimulate the outgrowth of Xenopus RGC axons along the optic tract.

Gabapentin is not a GABAB receptor agonist

Recent experiments have demonstrated that formation of functional type B gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptors requires co-expression of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). Despite the identification of these subunits and a number of associated splice variants, there has been little convincing evidence of pharmacological diversity between GABA(B) receptors comprising different subunit combinations. However, Ng et al. [Mol. Pharmacol., 59 (2000) 144] have recently suggested a novel and important pharmacological difference between GABA(B) receptor heterodimers expressing the GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b) receptor subunits. This study suggested that the antiepileptic GABA analogue gabapentin (Neurontin) is an agonist at GABA(B) receptors expressing the GABA(B1a) but not the GABA(B1b) receptor subunit. The importance of this finding with respect to identifying novel GABA(B) receptor subunit specific agonists prompted us to repeat these experiments in our own [35S]-GTPgammaS binding and second messenger assay systems. Here we report that gabapentin was completely inactive at recombinant GABA(B) heterodimers expressing either GABA(B1a) or GABA(B1b) receptor subunits in combination with GABA(B2) receptor subunits. In addition, in both CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurones from rodent hippocampal slices we were unable to demonstrate any agonist-like effects of gabapentin at either pre- or post-synaptic GABA(B) receptors. In contrast, gabapentin activated a GABA(A) receptor mediated chloride conductance. Our data suggest that gabapentin is not a GABA(B)-receptor agonist let alone a GABA(B) receptor subunit selective agonist.

GABA(B2) is essential for g-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer

GABA(B) receptors are unique among G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in their requirement for heterodimerization between two homologous subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), for functional expression. Whereas GABA(B1) is capable of binding receptor agonists and antagonists, the role of each GABA(B) subunit in receptor signaling is unknown. Here we identified amino acid residues within the second intracellular domain of GABA(B2) that are critical for the coupling of GABA(B) receptor heterodimers to their downstream effector systems. Our results provide strong evidence for a functional role of the GABA(B2) subunit in G-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer. In addition, they provide evidence for a novel "sequential" GPCR signaling mechanism in which ligand binding to one heterodimer subunit can induce signal transduction through the second partner of a heteromeric complex.

GABA(B2) is essential for g-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer

GABA(B) receptors are unique among G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in their requirement for heterodimerization between two homologous subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), for functional expression. Whereas GABA(B1) is capable of binding receptor agonists and antagonists, the role of each GABA(B) subunit in receptor signaling is unknown. Here we identified amino acid residues within the second intracellular domain of GABA(B2) that are critical for the coupling of GABA(B) receptor heterodimers to their downstream effector systems. Our results provide strong evidence for a functional role of the GABA(B2) subunit in G-protein coupling of the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer. In addition, they provide evidence for a novel "sequential" GPCR signaling mechanism in which ligand binding to one heterodimer subunit can induce signal transduction through the second partner of a heteromeric complex.