Costs of care associated with high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the University of Nebraska Medical Center 1989 to 1995

Filgrastim versus TBO-filgrastim to reduce the duration of neutropenia after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: TBO, or not TBO, that is the question

After a hospital-wide formulary change resulted in the replacement of filgrastim with TBO-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, we performed a retrospective comparison of patients with myeloma receiving 200 mg/m(2) melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to see whether the type of growth factor used post-transplant made a difference. One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients with myeloma were studied, 91 receiving filgrastim immediately prior to the change and 91 receiving TBO-filgrastim afterward. The CD34(+) cell dose was comparable, as were other characteristics. Although the overall time to neutrophil recovery was similar for both groups, early engraftment (≤ 12 d) occurred more often (p = 0.05), and late engraftment (≥ 14 d) less often (p = 0.09) in filgrastim-treated patients. The number of documented infections was significantly less in the TBO-filgrastim group. Day 100 mortality and hospital stay were similar for the two groups. These data indicate that there is no material difference between filgrastim and TBO-filgrastim in this clinical setting.

Economic impact of disease progression following front-line therapy in classical Hodgkin lymphoma

The current study aimed to assess the economic burden of progressive disease among patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) receiving second- or third-line therapy in a large US network of community-based practices. This retrospective, observational cohort analysis used electronic health records to examine adult patients with classical HL who received chemotherapy between 2007 and 2011. Of 291 observations, 112 had non-progressive disease (received only one line of therapy; LOT1), 114 received second-line therapy (LOT2), and 65 received third-line therapy (LOT3). In LOT2, 49 patients (43%) underwent transplant. In LOT3, 13 patients (20%) underwent transplant. The mean total cost per line of therapy was $21 956 in LOT1, $77 219 in LOT2, and $59 442 in LOT3. When transplant was required, the mean total cost per line of therapy increased 7- to 8-fold when compared with the cost of LOT1 (approximately $154 000 for LOT2 and $193 000 for LOT3). Future therapies that intervene as early as possible in the treatment algorithm to prevent or significantly delay relapse will likely result in significant cost savings.

Randomized study of early hospital discharge following autologous blood SCT: medical outcomes and hospital costs

We report the first randomized study comparing early hospital discharge with standard hospital-based follow-up after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and PBSCT. Patients aged 18-65 years, with an indication of PBSCT for non-leukemic malignant diseases were randomly assigned between two arms. Arm A consisted of early hospital discharge (HDCT during hospitalization, discharge at day 0, home stay with a caregiver, outpatient clinic follow-up). In arm B patients were followed up as inpatients. In total 131 patients were analyzed (66 in arm A and 65 in arm B). Patient characteristics and hematological reconstitution were comparable between the two groups. In arm A, 26 patients were actually discharged early. Patients in group A spent fewer days in hospital (11 vs 12 days, P=0.006). This strategy resulted in a 6% mean cost reduction per patient when compared with the conventional hospital-based group. The early discharge approach within the French health system, while safe and feasible, is highly dependent on social criteria (caregiver availability and home to hospital distance). It is almost always associated with conventional hospital readmission during the aplasia phase, and limits cost savings when considering the whole population of patients benefiting from HDCT in routine clinical practice.

Design of the EXercise Intervention after Stem cell Transplantation (EXIST) study: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualized high intensity physical exercise program on fitness and fatigue in patients with multiple myeloma or (non-) Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

Background

The use of high-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation has improved the outcome of hematologic malignancies. Nevertheless, this treatment can cause persistent fatigue and a reduced global quality of life, role and physical function. Physical exercise interventions may be beneficial for physical fitness, fatigue and quality of life. However, the trials conducted so far to test the effects of physical exercise interventions in this group of patients were of poor to moderate methodological quality and economic evaluations are lacking. Hence there is need for a rigorous, appropriately controlled assessment of the effectiveness of exercise programs in these patients. The aims of the present study are (1) to determine the effectiveness of an individualized high intensity strength and interval training program with respect to physiological and psychological health status in patients with multiple myeloma or (non-)Hodgkin's lymphoma who have recently undergone high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation; and (2) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective, single blind randomized controlled trial will be performed. We aim to recruit 120 patients within an inclusion period of 2 years at 7 hospitals in the Netherlands. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) intervention plus usual care; or (2) usual care. The intervention consists of an 18-week individualized supervised high-intensity exercise program and counselling. The primary outcomes (cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and fatigue) and secondary outcomes are assessed at baseline, at completion of the intervention and at 12 months follow-up.

Discussion

The strengths of this study include the solid trial design with clearly defined research groups and standardized outcome measures, the inclusion of an economic evaluation and the inclusion of both resistance and endurance exercise in the intervention program.

Trial registration

This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2341)

Costs of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with high-dose regimens

To characterize the costs of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with high-dose regimens (HDCT), we analyzed clinical information and costs of 315 HDCT recipients during a 4-year study period beginning in 2000. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify pre- and/or post-HDCT factors predicting higher costs within the first year. Overall survival (OS) at 100 days and 1 year were 80% and 58%, respectively. The median cost and days of hospitalization were $102,574 in 2004 US dollars and 36 days in the hospital for 100 days, and $128,800 and 39 days in the hospital for 1 year. Early costs, defined as costs within the first 100 days, accounted for 84% of total costs within the first year. Inpatient costs comprise 94% of the early costs, but only 61% of the later costs defined as costs incurred between 101 days and 1 year. Of the pre-HDCT factors, unrelated donors and advanced disease risk were significantly associated with increased cost. When post-HDCT events were also considered, these pre-HDCT factors were no longer independently predictive of high cost. Instead, severe complications post-HDCT were associated with higher costs, increasing total costs $20,228 on average. If no complications occurred, the mean cost within the first year was $79,222. These results provide cost estimates for complicated and uncomplicated HDCT procedures, as well as costs for management of specific transplant complications.

Evaluation of early hospital discharge after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

The increasing number of patients waiting for bone marrow transplantation in our service led to the implement of an early hospital discharge program with the intention of reducing the interval between diagnosis and transplantation. In this study we analyzed the results from early discharge, with outpatient care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study at the Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo.

METHODS

We compared clinical outcomes within 100 days post-transplantation, for 51 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who received partially outpatient-based allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the results were compared with a historical control group of 49 patients who received inpatient-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

There were significantly fewer days of hospitalization (p = 0.004), Pseudomonas-positive cultures (p = 0.006) and nausea and vomiting of grade 2-3 (p < 0.001) in the outpatient group. There were no significant differences in mortality between the groups and no deaths occurred within the first 48 days post-transplantation in the outpatient group.

CONCLUSIONS

This partially outpatient-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program allowed an increased number of transplantations in our institution, in cases of CML and other diseases, since it reduced the median length of hospital stay without increasing morbidity and mortality.

Cost-effectiveness of postremission intensive therapy in patients with acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of high-dose arabinoside (HiDAC)-based and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT)-based therapy in patients with acute leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcome, cost and cost-effectiveness of 106 patients treated from January 1994 to January 2002 [94 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/12 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)]. Forty-two young patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk received postremission intensive therapy (24 HiDAC-based/18 alloSCT-based therapy).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 50 months, the estimated 7-year overall survival for the HiDAC-based group showed a tendency to be higher than the alloSCT-based group (48% versus 28%, P = 0.1452). The HiDAC-based group spent a significantly lower total cost ($US51,857 versus 75,474, P = 0.004) than the alloSCT-based group. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the mean cost per year of life saved for the HiDAC-based group is considerably less expensive than the alloSCT-based group ($US11,224 versus 21,564). The reduced total cost for the HiDAC-based group originated from lower cost in room fees, medication, laboratory and procedure, but not in blood transfusion and professional manpower fees.

CONCLUSION

For the postremission therapy in young AML patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk, cost-effectiveness of HiDAC-based therapy compares favorably with that of alloSCT-based therapy, which deserves further clinical trials.

Economic assessment in the management of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

An increasing need for economic evaluations of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treatments exists. We performed a literature review on the currently available NHL economic evaluations, using PubMed and the Cochrane database. English and Dutch language papers on treatment in adults were selected. A total of 88 publications were found, 44 of which were included. Of these, 6 economic evaluation-specific methodological items are evaluated (study perspective, overhead costs, data sources, charges or prices, sensitivity analysis, presentations of resource use and unit costs), enabling readers to judge the value of these studies. The 11 subjects covered by the economic evaluations are discussed. Many NHL treatments remain to be studied in economic evaluations. Future publications should report on the six methodological items in more detail, and preferably tackle them in the recommended way.

Combined administration of alpha-erythropoietin and filgrastim can improve the outcome and cost balance of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders

We compared the use of G-CSF plus EPO in a group of 32 multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients with historical controls receiving G-CSF alone. Haemopoietic reconstitution was significantly faster in patients receiving G-CSF+EPO (group B), with a median time of 10 days to achieve an ANC count >0.5 x 10(9)/l, compared to 11 days in the historical group (A). The median duration of severe neutropenia (ANC count <100/ml) was significantly shorter in group B compared to group A; platelet counts >20 x 10(9) and >50 x 10(9)/l were achieved at days + 13 and + 17, respectively in group B, compared to days + 14 and + 24, respectively, in group A (P = 0.015, 0.002) patients. The transfusion requirement was reduced in group B, with 0 (0-6) RBC units and 1 (0-5) platelet unit transfused in group B vs 2 RBC (0-9) and 2 platelet units (0-8) in group A. Median days of fever, antibiotic therapy and hospital stay were reduced in group B (9.5 days vs 22). The mean cost of autotransplantation per group A patient was 23,988 Euro, compared with 18,394 Euro for a group B patient. Our study suggests that the EPO + G-CSF combination not only accelerates engraftment kinetics, but can also improve the clinical course of ASCT.

Lack of caregivers limits use of outpatient hematopoietic stem cell transplant program

Our goal was to compare direct and indirect medical costs and quality of life associated with inpatient vs outpatient autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AuHSCT). Twenty-one sequential outpatients and 26 inpatients were enrolled on this prospective trial. All candidates for AuHSCT were screened for eligibility for outpatient transplantation. Patients with either breast cancer or hematologic malignancy, insurance coverage for the outpatient procedure, one to three caregivers available to provide 24 h coverage, and no significant comorbidities were eligible to participate. Patients without caregivers or insurance coverage for outpatient transplant were accrued to the study in a consecutive manner as inpatient controls, based on willingness to participate in the quality of life portion of the study and to permit review of their hospital and billing records. Approximately half of all 139 prospective outpatient candidates were ineligible because they lacked a caregiver. Most commonly, the patient without a caregiver was single or widowed or their family and friends were needed to provide childcare. Most caregivers were college educated from families with incomes greater than US dollars 80000. Indirect costs to the caregivers totaled a median of US dollars 2520 (range US dollars 684-US dollars 4508), with the majority attributed to lost 'opportunity costs'. Overall, there were significant differences in the total costs of treatment for inpatient vs outpatient AuHSCT (US dollars 40985 vs US dollars 29210, P < 0.01)). In general, no significant differences were detected between inpatient and outpatient scores on quality of life measures. Although significant cost savings were associated with outpatient transplantation, this approach was applicable to only half of our otherwise eligible candidates because of a lack of caregivers. The financial burden associated with the caretaking role may underlie this finding.

Economic aspects of high-dose chemotherapy: a clinician's perspective review

Over the last 15 years, the increased use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has led to a considerable increase in the cost of cancer treatments. After making a general economic analysis of the benefits and costs of healthcare initiatives, this paper considers all of the different phases and elements of HDC, as well as the strategies for reducing basic, indirect and out-of-pocket costs. The cost of HDC has decreased by 40-60% over the last decade and its cost-effectiveness ratios are now similar or only slightly higher than those of other widely accepted medical interventions. However, except in the case of some hematological and paediatric neoplasms, the efficacy of the treatment has not yet been clearly defined and so it should only be used in well-designed clinical trials that should also include prospective cost evaluation measures.

Economic analysis of a phase III study of G-CSF vs placebo following allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF) decrease the duration of neutropenia following stem cell transplantation (SCT). With CSF-mobilized allogeneic blood SCT (alloBSCT), the yields of CD34+ cells are several-fold higher than in other SCT settings, raising concern that post-transplant CSF use may be unnecessary. In this study, we estimate the resource and cost implications associated with CSF use following alloBSCT. A cost identification analysis was conducted for 44 patients on a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of G-CSF following alloBSCT. Study drug was given daily until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 1000 cells/microl. Billing information from the time of transplant to day +100 was analyzed. The median number of days to an ANC > or = 500 cells/microl was shorter in the G-CSF arm, 10.5 days vs 15 days (P < 0.001), while platelet recovery and rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival were similar. Resource use was similar, including days hospitalized, days on antibiotics, blood products transfused and outpatient visits. Total median post-transplant costs were $76577 for G-CSF patients and $78799 for placebo patients (P = 0.93). G-CSF following allogeneic blood SCT decreased the median duration of absolute neutropenia and did not incur additional costs, but did not result in shorter hospitalizations, or less frequent antibiotic use.

Laboratory Automation: Trajectory, Technology, and Tactics

Laboratory automation is in its infancy, following a path parallel to the development of laboratory information systems in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Changes on the horizon in healthcare and clinical laboratory service that affect the delivery of laboratory results include the increasing age of the population in North America, the implementation of the Balanced Budget Act (1997), and the creation of disease management companies. Major technology drivers include outcomes optimization and phenotypically targeted drugs. Constant cost pressures in the clinical laboratory have forced diagnostic manufacturers into less than optimal profitability states. Laboratory automation can be a tool for the improvement of laboratory services and may decrease costs. The key to improvement of laboratory services is implementation of the correct automation technology. The design of this technology should be driven by required functionality. Automation design issues should be centered on the understanding of the laboratory and its relationship to healthcare delivery and the business and operational processes in the clinical laboratory. Automation design philosophy has evolved from a hardware-based approach to a software-based approach. Process control software to support repeat testing, reflex testing, and transportation management, and overall computer-integrated manufacturing approaches to laboratory automation implementation are rapidly expanding areas. It is clear that hardware and software are functionally interdependent and that the interface between the laboratory automation system and the laboratory information system is a key component. The cost-effectiveness of automation solutions suggested by vendors, however, has been difficult to evaluate because the number of automation installations are few and the precision with which operational data have been collected to determine payback is suboptimal. The trend in automation has moved from total laboratory automation to a modular approach, from a hardware-driven system to process control, from a one-of-a-kind novelty toward a standardized product, and from an in vitro diagnostics novelty to a marketing tool. Multiple vendors are present in the marketplace, many of whom are in vitro diagnostics manufacturers providing an automation solution coupled with their instruments, whereas others are focused automation companies. Automation technology continues to advance, acceptance continues to climb, and payback and cost justification methods are developing.