Individualizing high-dose oral busulfan: prospective dose adjustment in a pediatric population undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies

Therapeutic drug monitoring for cytotoxic anticancer drugs: Principles and evidence-based practices

Cytotoxic drugs are highly efficacious and also have low therapeutic index. A great degree of caution needs to be exercised in their usage. To optimize the efficacy these drugs need to be given at maximum tolerated dose which leads to significant amount of toxicity to the patient. The fine balance between efficacy and safety is the key to the success of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. However, it is possibly more rewarding to obtain that balance for this class drugs as the frequency of drug related toxicities are higher compared to the other therapeutic class and are potentially life threatening and may cause prolonged morbidity. Significant efforts have been invested in last three to four decades in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) research to understand the relationship between the drug concentration and the response achieved for therapeutic efficacy as well as drug toxicity for cytotoxic drugs. TDM evolved over this period and the evidence gathered favored its routine use for certain drugs. Since, TDM is an expensive endeavor both from economic and logistic point of view, to justify its use it is necessary to demonstrate that the implementation leads to perceivable improvement in the patient outcomes. It is indeed challenging to prove the utility of TDM in randomized controlled trials and at times may be nearly impossible to generate such data in view of the obvious findings and concern of compromising patient safety. Therefore, good quality data from well-designed observational study do add immense value to the scientific knowledge base, when they are examined in totality, despite the heterogeneity amongst them. This article compiles the summary of the evidence and the best practices for TDM for the three cytotoxic drug, busulfan, 5-FU and methotrexate. Traditional use of TDM or drug concentration data for dose modification has been witnessing a sea change and model informed precision dosing is the future of cytotoxic drug therapeutic management.

Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Busulfan Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Busulfan (Bu) is an old drug, but is still well recommended as an alkylating agent during conditioning therapy, before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although its dose administration is standardized and based on patient weight, therapeutic drug monitoring is required in order to maintain its exposure [as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity AUC_0-∞] within a narrow therapeutic range and, if necessary, to adjust the dose with as short a lead time as possible. The aim of the study is to evaluate the agreement (as calculated AUC) between a gold standard analytical method and a new one that is faster and easier.

METHODS

We analyzed 221 plasma samples from 37 children (0.25-16 years; 4-62.5 kg) and 11 adults (21-59 years; 45-80 kg), corresponding to 52 AUC values (ng h/mL). The drug exposure was calculated, simultaneously, by two validated analytical methods. The reference method was a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay combined with an ultraviolet detector (UV). The test method had a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) as detector; the clean-up procedures of the samples were different and faster.

RESULTS

The agreement between the two methods (reference and test) was evaluated in terms of Bu exposure differences based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and represented by the Bland-Altman plot. The CCC between the AUC of the two methods was excellent (0.868; 95% CI: 0.802-0.935). The precision of the measures (expressed by Pearson's italic "r") was 0.872, and the accuracy (accounted by the bias correction factor) was 0.996.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that the HPLC-MS/MS assay represents a very good alternative to the reference.

Busulfan Pharmacokinetics in Adenosine Deaminase-Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Gene Therapy

The pharmacokinetics of low-dose busulfan (BU) were investigated as a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen for autologous gene therapy (GT) in pediatric subjects with adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency disease (ADA SCID). In 3 successive clinical trials, which included either γ-retroviral (γ-RV) or lentiviral (LV) vectors, subjects were conditioned with BU using different dosing nomograms. The first cohort received BU doses based on body surface area (BSA), the second cohort received doses based on actual body weight (ABW), and in the third cohort, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to target a specific area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Neither BSA-based nor ABW-based dosing achieved a consistent cumulative BU AUC; in contrast, TDM-based dosing led to more consistent AUC. BU clearance increased as subject age increased from birth to 18 months. However, weight and age alone were insufficient to accurately predict the dose that would consistently achieve a target AUC. Furthermore, various clinical, laboratory, and genetic factors (eg, genotypes for glutathione-S-transferase isozymes known to participate in BU metabolism) were analyzed, but no single finding predicted subjects with rapid versus slow clearance. Analysis of BU AUC and the postengraftment vector copy number (VCN) in granulocytes, a surrogate marker of the level of engrafted gene-modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), demonstrated gene marking at levels sufficient for therapeutic benefit in the subjects who had achieved the target BU AUC. Although many factors determine the ultimate engraftment following GT, this work demonstrates that the BU AUC correlated with the eventual level of engrafted gene-modified HSPCs within a vector group (γ-RV versus LV), with significantly higher levels of granulocyte VCN in the recipients of LV-modified grafts compared to recipients of γ-RV-transduced grafts. Taken together, these findings provide insight into low-dose BU pharmacokinetics in the unique setting of autologous GT for ADA SCID, and these dosing principles may be applied to future GT trials using low-dose BU to open the bone marrow niche.

Busulfan systemic exposure and its relationship with efficacy and safety in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children: a meta-analysis

Background

Busulfan (Bu) is a key component of several conditioning regimens used before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the optimum systemic exposure (expressed as the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) of Bu for clinical outcome in children is controversial.

Methods

Research on pertinent literature was carried out at PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Observational studies were included, which compared clinical outcomes above and below the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) cut-off value, which we set as 800, 900, 1000, 1125, 1350, and 1500 μM × min. The primary efficacy outcome was notable in the rate of graft failure. In the safety outcomes, incidents of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) were recorded, as well as other adverse events.

Results

Thirteen studies involving 548 pediatric patients (aged 0.3–18 years) were included. Pooled results showed that, compared with the mean Bu AUC (i.e., the average value of AUC measured multiple times for each patient) of > 900 μM × min, the mean AUC value of < 900 μM × min significantly increased the incidence of graft failure (RR = 3.666, 95% CI: 1.419, 9.467). The incidence of VOD was significantly decreased with the mean AUC < 1350 μM × min (RR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.205–0.666) and < 1500 μM × min (RR = 0.409, 95% CI: 0182–0.920).

Conclusions

In children, Bu mean AUC above the cut-off value of 900 μM × min (after every 6-h dosing) was associated with decreased rates of graft failure, while the cut-off value of 1350 μM × min were associated with increased risk of VOD, particularly for the patients without VOD prophylaxis therapy. Further well-designed prospective and multi centric randomized controlled trials with larger sample size are necessary before putting our result into clinical practices.

Retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of intravenous busulfan vs. total-body irradiation after single cord blood transplantation

Limited to inadequate stem-cell doses, cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is accompanied by increased graft failure and delayed haematopoietic recovery. The conditioning regimen is critically important for engraftment, and numerous trials have been undertaken comparing the outcomes of IV Bu and TBI, but there are no comparative data for UCBT. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study to analyse the outcomes of IV Bu and TBI in UCBT patients with haematologic malignancies. Between 1 May, 2008 and 31 Mar, 31 2018, a total of 331 patients from the China Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation Corporation (IV Bu, n = 131; TBI, n = 200) were evaluated. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 91.6% in the IV Bu/Cy cohort and 98.0% in the Cy/TBI cohort (P < 0.001). The median times to neutrophil engraftment were 16 and 19 days (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed no statistical difference for nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.86; P = 0.695), relapse (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.60; P = 0.713) and overall survival (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.44; P = 0.763) between the two conditioning regimens. Our results show that both IV Bu and TBI are valid myeloablative conditioning regimens for haematologic malignancy patients treated with UCBT.

Monitoring of Busulphan Concentrations in Children Undergone Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Unicentric Experience over 10 years

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this report is to describe the experience in the management of busulphan-based conditioning regimen administered before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children.

METHODS

We report the values of the first dose AUC (area under the concentration-time curve, normal target between 3600 and 4800 ng·h/mL) in children treated with oral and intravenous busulphan, and we analyze the impact of some clinical variables in this cohort of patients.

RESULTS

82 children treated with busulphan before HSCT were eligible for the study: 57 received oral busulphan with a mean AUC of 3586 ng·h/mL, while 25 received intravenous busulphan with a mean AUC of 4158 ng·h/mL. Dose adjustment was based on first dose AUC. The dose was increased in 36 children (43.9%) and decreased in 26 patients (31.7%). Age at HSCT (P = 0.015), cumulative dose of busulphan as mg/m² (P < 0.001), busulphan dose prescribed as mg/Kg (P = 0.001), intravenous busulphan administration (P < 0.001), type of stem source cells (P = 0.016), and type of HSCT (P = 0.03) were associated with AUC levels. No statistically significant differences were found between transplant-related toxicity, acute and chronic graft versus host disease, engraftment, and AUC levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that older age at HSCT, intravenous administration of busulphan, cumulative, and prescribed dose of busulphan are associated with higher AUC levels. The absence of significant correlations between toxic events, graft failure, and AUC suggests the efficacy of busulphan concentrations monitoring in our patients.

Clarifying busulfan metabolism and drug interactions to support new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent with a limited therapeutic margin and exhibits inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK). Despite decades of use, mechanisms of Bu PK-based drug-drug interactions (DDIs), as well as the negative downstream effects of these DDIs, have not been fully characterized. Areas covered: This article provides an overview of Bu PK, with a primary focus on how known and potentially unknown drug metabolism pathways influence Bu-associated DDIs. In addition, pharmacogenomics of Bu chemotherapy and Bu-related DDIs observed in the stem cell transplant clinic (SCT) are summarized. Finally the increasing importance of Bu therapeutic drug monitoring is highlighted. Expert opinion: Mechanistic studies of Bu metabolism have shown that in addition to GST isoenzymes, other oxidative enzymes (CYP, FMO) and ABC/MDR drug transporters likely contribute to the overall clearance of Bu. Despite many insights, results from clinical studies, especially in polypharmacy settings and between pediatric and adult patients, remain conflicting. Further basic science and clinical investigative efforts are required to fully understand the key factors determining Bu PK characteristics and its effects on complications after SCT. Improved TDM strategies are promising components to further investigate, for instance DDI mechanisms and patient outcomes, in the highly complex SCT treatment setting.

Should busulfan therapeutic range be narrowed in pediatrics? Experience from a large cohort of hematopoietic stem cell transplant children

Busulfan, the corner stone of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation regimens, has a narrow therapeutic window. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing to reach the conventional area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) target range of 900-1500 μmol min/L is associated with better outcomes. We report our experience with busulfan TDM in a large cohort of children. The aims were to investigate the relevance of using a more restricted therapeutic range and investigate the association between busulfan therapeutic range and clinical outcome. This study includes 138 children receiving 16 doses of intravenous busulfan, with the first dose assigned based on weight and doses adjusted to a local AUC target range of 980-1250 μmol min/L. Busulfan TDM combined with model-based dose adjustment was associated with an increased probability of AUC target attainment, for both target range: 90.8% versus 74.8% for the conventional target range and 66.2% versus 43.9% for the local target range (P<0.001). The median follow-up was 56.2 months. Event-free survival was 88.5%, overall survival was 91.5% and veno-occlusive disease occurred in 18.3% of patients. No difference was observed for clinical outcomes depending on the selected target range. Pharmacokinetic monitoring and individualization of busulfan dosage regimen are useful in improving target attainment, but using a restricted target range has no impact on clinical outcomes.

Clinical comparison of weight- and age-based strategy of dose administration in children receiving intravenous busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Bu, combined with TDM-guided dosing, is associated with fewer graft failures/relapses and lower toxicity in pediatric HSCT. We aimed this retrospective study for comparison of weight- and age-based dosing in terms of clinical outcomes such as time to engraftment, early complications, EFS, OS, and toxicity profiles in children receiving iv Bu. Sixty-one children who underwent HSCT from April 2010 to February 2013 by means of a Bu-based conditioning regimen and completed 100 days after transplantation at Ankara Children?s Hematology and Oncology Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit were enrolled in this study. SOS and neutropenic fever occurred more frequently in the weight-based dosing group. We found a statistically significant correlation between Bu dose and the incidence of SOS (r = 0.26, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed only weight-based dosing of Bu was a significant predictor of SOS (HR = 9.46; p = 0.009). However, no relationship was found between two groups in terms of hemorrhagic cystitis, engraftment syndrome, acute or chronic GvHD, time to engraftment, chimerism, TRM, OS, and EFS rates. Weight-based dosing of Bu may cause higher incidence of SOS and early infectious complications at the places where TDM of Bu cannot be performed.

Association between busulfan exposure and outcome in children receiving intravenous busulfan before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous (IV) busulfan (Bu) combined with therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing is associated with better event-free survival (EFS), lower transplant-related mortality. But optimal target steady-state concentration (Css) of Bu in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the relation between Css of Bu and clinical outcomes in children receiving Bu before HSCT.

METHODS

This study includes 75 children receiving IV Bu in 16 doses, with first dose assigned based on age. Bu first-dose pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from Bu plasma concentrations measured at 6 time points by high-performance liquid chromatography. Doses were adjusted at the fifth dose to a target Css of 600-900 ng/mL. Cumulative incidence of overall survival (OS), EFS, transplant-related mortality, acute graft-versus host disease (aGVHD), and other toxicities in relation to Css of Bu were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves in univariate and Cox's proportional hazards model in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

After the first dose, median Css was 578 (325-1227) ng/mL. Forty-one patients had Bu IV dose increased by > 10%. Neutrophil and platelet recoveries, grade 2-4 aGVHD, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) incidences were 90%, 91%, 12%, and 13%, respectively. Relapse incidence was 33%. Incidence of veno-occlusive disease, hemorrhagic cystitis, and lung toxicities were 13%, 24%, and 7%, respectively. OS and EFS were 70% and 58%. First-dose Bu Css >600 ng/mL was associated with a higher NRM (P < 0.001) and grade 2-4 aGVHD (P = 0.04), a lower EFS (P < 0.001), and OS (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a significant association between the first-dose pharmacokinetics of Bu and NRM, OS, and EFS. Bu therapeutic drug monitoring provides information that potentially influences outcomes of HSCT in pediatric patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for adults AML using i.v. BU in the conditioning regimen: outcomes and risk factors for the occurrence of hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome

I.v. BU is frequently used in the conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT); however, overall outcomes, incidence of hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) and its risk factors are not well known. With this aim, we performed a study on 257 AML adult recipients. Seattle Criteria were used for diagnosis and classification of SOS. The median age was 44 years. Donors were HLA-identical siblings in 60%, HLA-matched unrelated in 29% and HLA mismatched in 11%. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 84% (i.v. BU with CY was the most frequently used regimen) and it was reduced intensity in 16% (i.v. BU associated with fludarabine). Acute and chronic GVHD was observed in 28% and 44%, respectively. Two-year incidence of non-relapse mortality was 16±2% and 2-year leukemia-free survival for patients in CR1, CR2 and non remission at HSCT were 55±4%, 58±7%, and 20±5%, respectively. At 6 months, incidence of SOS was 7.8±2%; and it was severe in eight patients (3%). Factors associated with the occurrence of SOS were: HLA-mismatched donor HSCT (P=0.002) and patients transplanted in non-remission (P=0.002). In conclusion, outcomes of HSCT using i.v. BU are encouraging in this setting, SOS incidence is low and it is influenced by the type of donor and disease status at the time of transplant.

The development of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity, conditioning regimen for cord blood transplantation

Cord blood transplantation is being used with increasing frequency for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Myeloablative preparative regimens provide antitumor efficacy and facilitate engraftment but are associated with higher morbidity and nonrelapse mortality rates than nonablative regimens. We evaluated 3 sequential myeloablative regimens in the cord blood transplant setting. Regimen 1 (melphalan, fludarabine, and thiotepa) produced prompt engraftment and minimal engraftment failure but was associated with a high nonrelapse mortality rate. Regimen 2 (busulfan and fludarabine) was very well tolerated but was associated with a high rate of engraftment failure and relapse. Regimen 3 (busulfan, clofarabine, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation given 9 days after the chemotherapy) was associated with a low rate of engraftment failure but was logistically difficult to administer. Finally, regimen 3 that included the total body irradiation given immediately after the chemotherapy was well tolerated, with prompt engraftment and tumor control. This latter regimen appears to be effective in preliminary studies and warrants further evaluation.

Comparison of intravenous with oral busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning regimens for pediatric acute leukemia

Recent reports revealed that intravenous (iv) busulfan (BU) may not only reduce early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but also improve overall survival (OS) probability in adults. Therefore, we retrospectively compared outcomes for 460 children with acute leukemia who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with either iv-BU (n = 198) or oral busulfan (oral-BU) (n = 262) myeloablative conditioning. OS at 3 years was 53.4% ± 3.7% with iv-BU and 55.1% ± 3.1% with oral-BU; the difference was not statistically significant (P = .77). OS at 3 years in 241 acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 219 acute myeloid leukemia patients was 56.4% ± 5.5% with iv-BU and 54.6% ± 4.1 with oral-BU (P = .51) and 51.0% ± 5.0% with iv-BU and 55.8% ± 4.8% with oral-BU (P = .83), respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years with iv-BU was similar to that with oral-BU (39.0% ± 3.6% and 36.4% ± 3.1%, respectively; P = .67). Cumulative incidence of NRM at 3 years was 16.6% ± 2.7% with iv-BU and 18.3% ± 2.5% with oral-BU (P = .51). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed no significant survival advantage with iv-BU. In conclusion, iv-BU failed to show a significant survival advantage in children with acute leukemia.

Increased risk of gastrointestinal acute GVHD following the addition of melphalan to busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning

Risk factors associated with the development of aGVHD in the gastrointestinal tract have not been studied in depth. We retrospectively assessed 25 pediatric patients with MDS and JMML and compared the treatment outcome of two different conditioning regimens. Seventeen children (68%) underwent conditioning with busulfan (Bu), cyclophosphamide (Cy), and melphalan (Mel) and eight children (32%) with Bu and Cy. Gastrointestinal aGVHD stages II-IV (day 0-100) were observed in 47% (eight of 17) of the patients in the BuCyMel group and in none (0 of 8) in the BuCy group (p < 0.05). In patients who developed gastrointestinal aGVHD stages III-IV, a 24-h variation in the Bu concentration with a nighttime peak was noted. HC and liver aGVHD stages II-IV were observed in 47% (eight of 17) and 35% (six of 17) after BuCyMel conditioning and in 0% (0 of 17) and 12.5% (one of eight) after BuCy conditioning. The overall survival rate was 53% (nine of 17) in the BuCyMel group and 62.5% (five of eight) in the BuCy group. In conclusion, the addition of melphalan to the BuCy conditioning regimen resulted in severe gastrointestinal complications and did not improve overall survival.

Levetiracetam for busulfan-induced seizure prophylaxis in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Anti-seizure prophylaxis is routinely utilized during busulfan administration for HSCT. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of levetiracetam in children undergoing HSCT. A total of 28 children and young adults received levetiracetam during HSCT and the outcomes and costs were compared to a historical, but similar cohort of 25 patients who had received fosphenytoin. Levetiracetam was well tolerated and was efficacious in preventing seizures. Cost of drug, administration, and monitoring were also similar among the two groups. Due to non-induction of the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, levetiracetam may lead to better dose assurance of busulfan in targeted dose regimens for HSCT.

TBI and melphalan followed by allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in children with advanced hematological malignancies

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the conditioning regimen that consisted of TBI and melphalan (L-PAM), followed by hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in 23 children with advanced hematological malignancies. The median age at HSCT was 9 (range, 2-15) years. The underlying diseases were ALL in 16 patients (5 in CR2, 3 in CR3, 6 in relapse (RP) and 2 in induction failure (IF)), AML in 4 patients (3 in RP and 1 in IF) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 3 patients (1 in CR3, 1 in CR4 and 1 in RP). The stem cell sources were BM for 19 patients and cord blood for 4 patients. All patients received the conditioning regimen that consisted of TBI 12 or 13.2 Gy and L-PAM 210 mg/m(2). In all, 22 patients engrafted on the median of day 16 (range, 10-23). The regimen was well tolerated and common regimen-related toxicities (RRTs) included grade II stomatitis and grade I hepatic toxicity. The cumulative incidences of RP and TRM were 47.6 and 21.5%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.4 months, the probability of disease-free survival was 41.0%. The regimen may provide sufficient anti-leukemic effect without increased RRT for advanced pediatric hematological malignancies.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE

To determine the safety, efficacy, and PK profile of intravenous busulfan (Bu) in the context of a Bu and cyclophosphamide (IVBuCy) preparative regimen in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Twenty-four children were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter trial of IVBuCy as the preparative regimen for HLA-matched sibling allogeneic HSCT. IVBu was administered q6 hr for 16 doses with a targeted area under the curve (AUC) of 900-1,350 microMol-min. The initial dose was 0.8 mg/kg for children >4 years of age and 1 mg/kg for those <4 years of age. PK of the first dose IVBu was determined to calculate a single dosage adjustment, and with the 9th and 13th doses to confirm steady-state PK.

RESULTS

The targeted AUC was achieved with the first dose in 17/24 (71%) of the children using the age-adjusted dosing approach. Dosing was increased in five patients, and reduced in two patients to achieve target values. After dose adjustment based on PK, 91% of the children had an AUC within the target range at steady state (AUCss). Median final dosing and clearance (CL) of IVBu were 1.1 mg/kg and 4.1 ml/min/kg in patients < or =4 years, and 0.9 mg/kg and 2.9 ml/min/kg in patients >4 years. All children were engrafted with documented donor chimerism. No late rejections or graft failures occurred. Four patients had veno-occlusive disease, three of which resolved within 2 weeks of onset. Two children died from transplant-related causes unrelated to Bu.

CONCLUSION

IVBu is a safe and effective and offers the benefit of predictable and consistent systemic exposure.

Evaluating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients receiving bone marrow transplantation

BU is a commonly used conditioning agent in BMT. However, it is a narrow therapeutic index drug which shows a strong correlation between AUC and both efficacy and toxicity. Studies in pediatric patients have suggested that children less than four yr of age have a greater clearance and thus lower AUC at standard adult doses. The goal of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate any age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences in pediatric patients who received BU as a conditioning agent. From 2003 to 2006, 21/77 pediatric patients who received BMT were reviewed. There were 15 males and six females with a mean age of six yr old. Diagnoses of leukemia (n = 11), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 3), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2), and other (n = 5) were included. Sixteen patients received BU + cyclophosphamide while five patients received BU + another agent. There were 20 allogeneic and one autologous transplants among which 16 were human leukocyte antigen matched and five were mismatched. Average BU clearance in patients younger than four yr old (n = 8) was 4.1 +/- 1.0 mL/min/kg vs. 3.1 +/- 0.7 mL/min/kg in patients older than four yr old (n = 13) (p = 0.02). The corresponding averages for AUC were 998 +/- 226 microm x min vs. 1155 +/- 183 microm x min (p = 0.12). No patients younger than four yr old developed VOD while five of the older patients did (p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in terms of engraftment and acute GvHD. There were significant age-related pharmacokinetic differences in pediatric patients less than four yr of age receiving BU for conditioning prior to BMT. There was a decrease in drug toxicity seen in these patients.

Influence of GST gene polymorphisms on busulfan pharmacokinetics in children

Busulfan (BU) is a key compound in conditioning myeloablative regimens for children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are wide interindividual differences in BU pharmacokinetics, which increase the risk of veno-occlusive disease, graft rejection and disease relapse. As BU is mainly metabolized by glutathione S-transferase (GST), it is hypothesized that functional polymorphisms in GST genes may explain in part the variability in BU pharmacokinetics. We analyzed polymorphisms in GSTA1 (C-69T, A-513G, G-631T, C-1142G), GSTM1 (deletion) and GSTP1 (A1578G, C2293T) genes in 28 children undergoing HSCT. All patients had individualized dosing based on pharmacokinetics after the first dose of intravenous BU. GSTM1-null individuals had higher drug exposure (P(Cmax)=0.008; P(AUC)=0.003; P(Css)=0.02) and lower clearance (P(CL)=0.001). Multivariate regression models showed that, other than the drug dose and age, the GSTM1 genotype was the best predictor of first-dose pharmacokinetic variability. GSTM1-null patients also received lower cumulative BU doses (P=0.02). No association was found between BU exposure and major GSTA1 or GSTP1 gene variants. In children, GSTM1 polymorphism seems to modify BU pharmacokinetics after intravenous drug administration.

Use of enzyme replacement therapy (Laronidase) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for mucopolysaccharidosis I: experience in 18 patients

We describe the use of enzyme replacement therapy in conjunction with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 18 consecutive patients with severe mucopolysaccharidosis type I. The survival and engraftment rate was 89% overall and 93% for the 15 patients who received full-intensity conditioning.

Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients

AIM

To examine inter- and intrapatient variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) busulphan given as a single daily dose to children with malignant (n = 19) and nonmalignant (n = 21) disease.

METHODS

Busulphan (120 mg m(-2), 130 mg m(-2) or 3.2 mg kg(-1)) was administered over median 2.1 h. Blood samples (4-10) were collected after the first dose, busulphan concentrations were measured and pharmacokinetic parameters, including clearance (CL) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), were determined using the Kinetica software (Innaphase). Interpatient variability was assessed as percent coefficient of variation (% CV). Intrapatient variability was assessed by calculating percent differences between observed full dose AUC and AUC predicted from an initial 65 mg m(-2) dose in 13 children who had busulphan pharmacokinetic monitoring.

RESULTS

Clearance of i.v. busulphan in 40 children was 4.78 +/- 2.93 l h(-1) (% CV 61%), 0.23 +/- 0.08 l h(-1) kg(-1) (% CV 35%) and 5.79 +/- 1.59 l h(-1) m(-2) (% CV 27%). Age correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with CL (l h(-1)) and CL (l h(-1) kg(-1)), but not with CL (l h(-1) m(-2)). AUC normalized to the 130 mg m(-2) dose ranged from 14.1 to 56.3 mg l(-1) x h (% CV 37%) and also did not correlate with age. Interpatient variability in CL (l h(-1) m(-2)) was highest in six children with immune deficiencies (60%) and lowest in seven children with solid tumours (14%). Intrapatient variability was <13% for nine (of 13) children, but between 20 and 44% for four children.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable inter- and intrapatient variability in i.v. busulphan CL (l h(-1) m(-2)) and exposure that is unrelated to age, especially in children with immune deficiencies. These results suggest that monitoring of i.v. busulphan pharmacokinetics is required.

Once-daily intravenous busulfan with therapeutic drug monitoring compared to conventional oral busulfan improves survival and engraftment in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Because of intra- and interindividual variability, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics of busulfan (Bu) in children, oral busulfan without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is assumed to be associated with higher graft failure rates as well as higher toxicity (eg, veno-occlusive disease [VOD]). This study compares the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) of 2 groups: 1) 30 patients who received myeloablation with once-daily intravenous (i.v.) dose-targeted busulfan (BUdtIV) based on TDM and 2) 30 patients who received the current practice of untargeted oral busulfan (BUPO). Patients received a 3-hour infusion of Bu at a first dose of 120 mg/m(2) (age >or=1 year) or 80 mg/m(2) (<1 year), or BUPO 1 mg/kg 4 times daily. Both regimens were continued for 4 days. The target area under the curve (AUC) was defined as 17,500 microg *h/l. BUdtIV resulted in higher event-free survival (EFS) and survival rates compared to BUPO (EFS: 30% versus 83%, P < .001, survival: 53% versus 83%, P = .016). BUdtIV was associated with more cases of VOD. TDM was feasible in routine clinical practice. The results show that i.v. Bu using TDM is preferable over oral Bu in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, especially in those at high risk for graft failure/relapse.

Influence of Underlying Disease on Busulfan Disposition in Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients: A Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetic Study

Busulfan is an alkylating agent used in a conditioning regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation. Busulfan has a narrow therapeutic index, giving rise to major liver toxicity (veno-occlusive disease), and a wide interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability. This report presents the results of a population pharmacokinetic analysis leading to models based on underlying diseases requiring bone marrow transplantation. One hundred children received oral busulfan-based conditioning regimens between March 1998 and February 2006. Busulfan pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (Ka, first order absorption rate constant; Vs, volume of distribution related to the body weight; and Cl/F, apparent clearance) were estimated by using the nonparametric adaptative grid (NPAG) algorithm in patients divided into four groups according to initial diagnosis: metabolic diseases, hemoglobinopathies, hematological malignancies, and immune deficiencies. Ka and Vs did no differ significantly in the four subgroups. Cl/F and areas under the plasma concentration curve were significantly different in the four groups. Cl/F was significantly higher in the hemoglobinopathies group (P = 0.002), with a mean value of 7.78 L . h, whereas the immune deficiencies group was characterized by the lowest Cl/F (3.59 L . h). Interindividual variability was shown by high interindividual parameter percent coefficients of variation (CV%) but, nevertheless, with less diversity in the population parameter distributions for Vs in the three subgroups-metabolic diseases, hemoglobinopathies, and malignant diseases-and in Cl/F for patients with hemoglobinopathies. The fit was good for busulfan concentration predictions based on Bayesian individual posterior values, with little bias and good precision. In comparison with the overall population, the only model of subgroup presenting a greater precision was patients with hemoglobinopathies (P = 0.002). Use of these more specific models of a given disease may well result in more accurate individualization of busulfan dose regimens, especially in very sparse blood sampling situations.

Population pharmacokinetic-based dosing of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. Twenty-four pediatric patients were treated with intravenous busulfan, 1.0 or 0.8 mg/kg for ages < or = 4 years or > 4 years, respectively, 4 times a day for 4 days. Dense PK sampling was performed. Body weight, age, gender, and body surface area were explored for effects on PK, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess different dosing regimens. The PK of intravenous busulfan was described by a 1-compartment model with clearance of 4.04 L/h/20 kg and volume of distribution of 12.8 L/20 kg. Simulations indicated that the mg/kg and mg/m2 regimens were similar and achieved the desired target exposure in approximately 60% of patients. This model suggests that patients < or = 12 kg should be dosed at 1.1 mg/kg and those > 12 kg dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment will further improve therapeutic targeting.

Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of pretransplantation preparative regimens: a comparison with an every 6-hour dosing schedule

In pretransplantation therapy busulfan is typically given every 6 hours. We infused busulfan once daily at 130 mg/m2 for 4 days, performing pharmacokinetic analyses on plasma concentration-time data (n = 60 patients) on days 1, 3, and/or 4. Mean (percent coefficient of variation) maximum concentration, volume of distribution, half-life, and clearance were 3.6 microg/mL (13.8%), 22.6 L/m2 (20.2%), 2.73 hours (27.5%), and 109 mL/min/m2 (26%), respectively. The mean (percent coefficient of variation) and median daily areas under the curve were 4873 (21.8%) and 4871 microM x minute. Intrapatient variability in day-to-day estimated clearance was <20%, without day-to-day drug accumulation. The pharmokinetic parameters were compared with those from 47 patients given intravenous busulfan at approximately 0.8 mg/kg (approximately 32 mg/m2) every 6 hours. We conclude that there is (1) a dose proportionality based on mean and median areas under the curve, (2) unchanged estimated clearance with a 4-fold increase in dose and a 2.5-fold difference in dosing rate, (3) negligible variability in dose-to-dose pharmacokinetics and negligible interdose accumulation with once-daily administration, and (4) no change in pharmokinetic parameter(s) with concomitant use of imidazole antifungals, oral contraceptives, or phenytoin. In summary, intravenous busulfan has highly predictable, linear pharmacokinetics from 32 mg/m2 (approximately 0.8 mg/kg) to 130 mg/m2 (approximately 3.2 mg/kg). Further, once-daily intravenous busulfan dosing is convenient, favoring its more widespread application.

Pretransplant Conditioning in Adults and Children: Dose Assurance With Intravenous Busulfan

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide clinical insights into dosing and administration of IV busulfan, a conditioning agent for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

DATA SOURCES

Review of published literature related to busulfan pretransplant conditioning using MEDLINE. Meeting abstracts, investigational protocols, and pharmaceutical manufacturers' package inserts also were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Busulfan is an effective myeloablative conditioning agent for HSCT. The IV formulation increases dose assurance and the ability to target a therapeutic window. Therapeutic drug monitoring ensures that targeted blood levels are achieved, especially in children, thereby preventing underdosing, which can lead to disease progression or rejection, as well as overdosing, which can cause an increased risk of toxic side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

IV busulfan is a convenient, safe, and effective conditioning agent used in HSCT that has a predictable pharmacokinetic profile.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

An understanding of the pharmacokinetic principles underlying the relationship between the therapeutic window for busulfan and optimal HSCT outcomes will facilitate proper dosing and administration of IV busulfan.

Absence of veno-occlussive disease in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation with targeted busulfan dosage

BACKGROUND

Plasma concentrations of oral busulfan (BU) were measured in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with a double alkylating conditioning protocol in order to individualise doses of BU based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to reduce toxicities related to BU exposure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four consecutive patients with MM participating in the co-operative Spanish protocol were prospectively evaluated. Conditioning regimen prior to autologous infusion consisted of BU followed by melphalan. BU pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for each patient after the first dose based on measured concentrations and subsequent doses were modified as necessary to achieve target exposure.

RESULTS

Mean BU exposure (AUCss) (+/-DS) before dosage modification range from 3192 to 12 180 ng h/mL. Twenty-six out of 44 (59%) patients required dose adjustment. None of the patients developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Grade > or = II oropharyngeal mucositis was observed in the majority of patients (95%) and the severity of mucositis increased with increasing average steady-state BU plasma concentration. There were four treatment-related deaths: two patients died from multiorgan failure and two of respiratory infections. Of the remaining 40 patients, 15 were in complete remission with negative immunofixation, 21 in partial remission and four in stable disease 3 months after ASCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study show the variability in BU pharmacokinetic parameters and suggest the possible relationship between toxicities and BU exposure. Individualising BU dosage in MM patients undergoing ASCT we observed the absence of VOD.

Development of a Pharmacokinetic and Bayesian Optimal Sampling Model for Individualization of Oral Busulfan in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to minimize toxicity and maximize the therapeutic efficacy of busulfan, which shows high intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and erratic oral absorption. This study was designed to develop a pharmacokinetic model that could accommodate the erratic oral absorption of busulfan and to use this model to develop an optimal sparse pharmacokinetic sampling strategy to improve the precision and efficiency of therapeutic drug monitoring. Twenty-one pharmacokinetic profiles were collected from 12 patients receiving oral busulfan before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Each pharmacokinetic profile was defined by 5 to 9 plasma concentrations. Candidate pharmacokinetic models were initially fit to the data by maximum likelihood, with model discrimination by Akaike's Information Criterion. Maximum likelihood results were used to derive Bayesian previous parameter estimates, and D-optimal design was used to determine optimal sparse sampling strategies. Each candidate sampling strategy was tested in each patient by comparing the resultant Css obtained from the sparse strategy to the actual Css derived from each patient's full pharmacokinetic dataset. The final model was a 1-compartment model, with oral busulfan absorbed in 1 to 3 phases, and fit the data well. All limited sampling models tested were unbiased in their results, and a 4-sample scheme proved to adequately characterize busulfan pharmacokinetics, and should allow for a reduced sampling frequency for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Influence of glutathione S-transferase A1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan

BACKGROUND

High-dose oral busulfan is used for myeloablative chemotherapy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Fatal adverse effects or relapse may occur with excess or insufficient busulfan exposure. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) A1, whose genetic polymorphism in its promoter region has been reported, is responsible for busulfan metabolism. We investigated the polymorphism of GSTA1 on busulfan pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Blood samples (6 or 7 points) were taken from patients receiving high-dose oral busulfan (approximately 1 mg/kg every 6 h) on Doses 1 and 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from plasma busulfan concentration.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. Nine patients were genotyped as wildtype (GSTA1*A/*A), and 3 as heterozygous variants (GSTA1*A/*B). At Dose 5, the heterozygous group had significantly lower elimination constant (0.176+/-0.038 vs. 0.315+/-0.021 h-1; P=0.008) and clearance corrected by bioavailability (0.118+/-0.013 vs. 0.196+/-0.011 l/h/kg; P=0.004), and significantly higher mean plasma busulfan concentration (1344+/-158 vs. 854+/-44 ng/ml; P=0.001) than the wildtype.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on the significant influence of GSTA1 polymorphism on busulfan elimination. This may account for the large inter-individual variance in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and with more information confirming our study, busulfan high-dose therapy may be optimized by GSTA1 genotyping in advance.

Intravenous busulfan in children prior to stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics in association with early clinical outcome and toxicity

We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan (Bu) in children in order to further optimize intravenous Bu dosing in relation to toxicity and survival. A total of 31 children undergoing Bu-based conditioning for allogeneic SCT were enrolled in a study. The starting dose was 1.0 mg/kg (age < 4 years) and 0.8 mg/kg (age > or =4 years), four doses per day during 4 days. Dose adjustment was allowed up to a maximum dose of 1.0 mg/kg per dose if the target area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) was not reached. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed after the first dose. Donor engraftment was established in 28 out of 31 patients. The average AUC after the first dose was the same in children < 4 years as in children > or =4 years. Mean clearance was higher in children < 4 years than in children > or =4 years. In 35% of all patients, total AUC was within the target AUC. The other children's AUCs were below the target range. No relationships were found between systemic exposure to Bu and toxicity or clinical outcome. We concluded that, in accordance with previous data, within the observed AUCs no clear relationship was observed between Bu AUC and outcome with respect to toxicity, engraftment and relapse.

Individualised Cancer Chemotherapy: Strategies and Performance of Prospective Studies on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Dose Adaptation

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the optimisation of drug treatment. Although pharmacokinetic variability is an established factor involved in the variation of therapeutic outcome of many chemotherapeutic agents, the use of TDM in the field of oncology has been limited thus far. An important reason for this is that a therapeutic index for most anticancer agents has not been established; however, in the last 20 years, relationships between plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcome have been defined for various chemotherapeutic agents. Several attempts have been made to use these relationships for optimising the administration of chemotherapeutics by applying pharmacokinetically guided dosage. These prospective studies, individualising chemotherapy dose during therapy based on measured drug concentrations, are discussed in this review. We focus on the way a target value is defined, the methodologies used for dose adaptation and the way the performance of the dose-adaptation approach is evaluated. Furthermore, attention is paid to the results of the studies and the applicability of the strategies in clinical practice. It can be concluded that TDM may contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should therefore be further investigated.

Intraindividual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing a bone marrow transplant: assessment of a test dose and first dose strategy

Busulfan systemic exposure correlates with regimen-related toxicity, engraftment and relapse in select patients receiving high-dose oral busulfan (HD-BU) (1 mg/kg dose or 40 mg/m dose every 6 h for 16 doses) as part of a preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring is frequently conducted after the first HD-BU dose in order to determine necessary dose adjustments. Limitations with this method include the need for rapid determination of busulfan plasma concentration and difficulties with estimating apparent oral clearance in patients who exhibit delayed absorption of HD-BU. This pharmacokinetic study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the apparent oral clearance obtained after administering a lower (0.25 mg/kg) test dose and the traditional (1 mg/kg) first dose to predict the dose required to achieve a desired area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at steady-state (13th dose). In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test, first and 13th dose were compared to assess intrasubject variability. Twenty-nine patients received a test dose of oral busulfan (0.25 mg/kg) the day immediately prior to initiation of HD-BU. Busulfan serum concentrations were measured following the test, first and 13th doses using gas chromatography with electron capture detection. The AUC and apparent oral clearance were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Therapeutic drug monitoring following the first dose of HD-BU was conducted for clinical purposes in six patients, and dose adjustment between the first and 13th dose occurred in only two patients. The dose-corrected test dose and first dose AUC and apparent oral clearance were not bioequivalent (two one-sided t-tests, +/-20%). The first dose and 13th dose AUC and apparent oral clearance were also not bioequivalent. Six of the 29 patients receiving HD-BU dose based on weight (1 mg/kg) would have achieved a steady-state AUC of 3600-5400 ng x h/ml, a frequently used target AUC, as compared to eight and 13 patients if their dose was based on the apparent oral clearance following the test dose and first dose HD-BU, respectively. Monitoring busulfan concentrations after a test dose or a first dose provides a better estimate of the dose needed to achieve the target steady-state AUC as compared to traditional weight-based dosing. However, significant intraindividual variability exists in the apparent oral clearance of busulfan and follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended particularly if the desired target AUC range is narrow.

I.V. busulfan in pediatrics: a novel dosing to improve safety/efficacy for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients

A retrospective population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed in 24 pediatric patients (PEDS) (0.45-16.7 years old) receiving i.v. busulfan/cyclophosphamide (i.v. Bu/Cy 4) regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. I.V. Bu doses were given as a 2-hour infusion every 6 h over 4 days. Initial dosing of i.v. Bu was 1 mg/kg for children < or =4 years old and 0.8 mg/kg for patients >4 years old. Bu plasma concentrations at doses 1, 9 and 13 were analyzed through a multivariate NONMEM analysis. A close log-linear relationship between body weight (BW) and i.v. Bu clearance was demonstrated with no further age-dependency or gender effect. The interpatient coefficient of variation (CV) in Bu clearance significantly decreased from 56% (covariate-free model) to 19% (BW covariate model) and reproducible i.v. Bu exposure between doses was illustrated (intraindividual CV=9%). Based on the PPK model, a novel Bu dosing regimen (ie: doses in mg/kg adjusted to discrete weight categories) for a better AUC targeting was developed by simulation on 1000 patients. Age-based dosing was demonstrated not to be clinically relevant with i.v. Bu. Use of the new BW-based dosing appears to be more appropriate for the PEDS.

Pharmacokinetics and individualized dose adjustment of intravenous busulfan in children with advanced hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a recently approved intravenous busulfan (IVBU) formulation as a part of the preparative regimen in 20 children with advanced hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Seventeen patients received a thiotepa, IVBU, and cyclophosphamide-based regimen, and 3 patients received an IVBU and cyclophosphamide-based regimen. All patients received IVBU 0.8 mg/kg for the first 2 doses; thereafter, the IVBU dose was modified, if required, to achieve a final area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at steady state of 1150 micromol/L/min per dose (range, 1000-1300 micromol/L/min per dose; SD +/-13%) based on the first-dose PK determination. PK studies were repeated on subsequent doses to verify the final AUC. Initial mean IVBU clearance and half-life were 3.96 mL/min/kg and 1.98 hours, respectively. Sixteen (80%) of the 20 patients received dose adjustments: 14 patients required dose escalations, and 2 required dose reductions. Overall, thirteen (72%) of 18 available sample sets at final follow-up PK analysis showed the IVBU exposure to be within the targeted range. IVBU PK was linear, and interpatient variability was much lower than that observed with oral busulfan. IVBU was well tolerated, and no case of hepatic veno-occlusive disease was encountered. Mild and transient hyperbilirubinemia was observed in 7 patients. Thirteen of the 20 patients were alive at a median follow-up of 651 days (range, 386-1555 days). We conclude that a standardized IVBU dose of 0.8 mg/kg in children does not always result in an AUC within the reference range defined in this study. Therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adjustment based on first-dose PK can optimize the systemic busulfan exposure for children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

[Busulfan and cycosporin in bone graft children]

Most drugs exhibit both inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. This variability explains the different responses observed in patients exposed to standard doses and must be taken into consideration when the therapeutic window is narrow. Population pharmacokinetics provides mean (or median) values of pharmacokinetic parameters as well as the distribution pattern and the statistical relationship with covariables in a group of individuals presenting common characteristics. Among the different methods developed for population pharmacokinetics, the data pool method, as well as the two-step and one-step methods (NONMEM and NPEM) are attractive. Population models can then be developed using bayesian logistics to obtain an estimation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of a given patient and predict the most adapted dose in light of the therapeutic target (residual serum concentration, mean concentration.). Busulfan is an alkylizing agent used instead of radiotherapy for pre-graft preparation before bone marrow grafts in children. This compound requires dose monitoring because of its narrow therapeutic window: under-dosing raises the risk of graft rejection; inversely over-dosing can cause potentially fatal complications such as occlusive venous disease. Interindividual variability is characteristic of busulfan kinetics. Several factors can explain part of this variability: age, underlying disease, changes in liver function, drug bioavailability, chronobiology. The short treatments used (most protocols have 16 doses given in four days) require rapid monitoring to propose effective adjustments. In this context, use of bayesian logistics to estimate the patient's pharmokinetic parameters is very useful for correct dosing. This type of monitoring could also be used for other compounds such as cyclosporine, with a narrow therapeutic window.

Intravenous busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in infants: clinical and pharmacokinetic results

SUMMARY

High-dose busulfan is an important component of myeloablative regimens. Variable drug exposure may occur following oral administration. Therefore, the use of intravenous busulfan has been advocated. Previous work has suggested a cumulative dosage of 16 mg/kg for haematopoietic transplantation in children less than 3 years of age, but only limited data are available in infants. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan administered at the suggested dosage were studied in 14 infants (median age 4.7 months). Busulfan plasma concentrations were measured by either GC-MS or HPLC-UV. In seven patients, the dose was decreased to target an area- under- the- curve of 600-1300 micromol min. The median total dose given was 13.8 mg/kg. All patients engrafted. Severe veno-occlusive disease occurred in one patient. Our study demonstrates that a cumulative dosage of 16 mg/kg is associated with higher exposure than expected in infants. We suggest an initial dose of 0.8 mg/kg followed by pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustment.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children prior to stem cell transplantation

AIMS

Intravenous formulations of busulfan have recently become available. Although busulfan is used frequently in children as part of a myeloablative regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation, pharmacokinetic data on intravenous busulfan in children are scarce. The aim was to investigate intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children and to suggest a limited sampling strategy in order to determine busulfan systemic exposure with the minimum of inconvenience and risk for the patient.

METHODS

Plasma pharmacokinetics after the first administration was investigated in six children using nonlinear mixed effect modelling.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics showed little variability and were described adequately with a one-compartment model (population estimates CL,av=0.29 l h(-1) kg(-1); V,av=0.84 l kg(-1); t(1/2)=1.7-2.8 h). Combined with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure, the model can adequately estimate the systemic exposure to intravenous busulfan, which in children appears to be at the lower end of the adult range.

CONCLUSIONS

Busulfan systemic exposure in children during intravenous administration can be estimated adequately with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure from a one-compartment model. Intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children should be the subject of more research.