Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rh-G-CSF) may accelerate hematopoietic recovery after HLA-identical sibling allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Revisiting the Utility of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Post-Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Outpatient-Based Transplantations

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to reduce the time to neutrophil engraftment, as well as the duration of hospitalization post-transplantation. However, prior studies have focused on inpatient-based ASCT, where patients are routinely admitted for conditioning and frequently remain hospitalized until signs of neutrophil recovery. Given improvements in post-transplantation care, an increasing number of patients, particularly those receiving ASCT for multiple myeloma, are now undergoing transplantation in an outpatient setting. We hypothesized that the routine use of G-CSF for outpatient-based ASCT might not result in the same benefit with respect to a reduced duration of hospitalization and thus should be reconsidered in this setting. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 633 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma (MM; n = 484) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 149) who underwent ASCT between September 2018 and February 2023. Outpatient ASCT comprised 258 (53%) of combined MM and NHL cases. Starting in September 2021, post-transplantation G-CSF was incorporated into the supportive care regimen for all ASCTs. A total of 410 patients (309 with MM, 101 with NHL) underwent ASCT during the pre-G-CSF policy period and 223 (175 with MM, 48 with NHL) did so in the post-G-CSF policy period. The primary outcome focused on the duration of hospitalization within the first 30 days following graft infusion. As expected, after implementation of the G-CSF policy, the time to neutrophil engraftment was reduced in the patients with MM (mean, -2.8 days; P < .0001) and patients with NHL (mean, -2.9 days; P < .0001). However, among the patients with MM, roughly one-half of whom underwent outpatient-based ASCT, the inpatient duration during the first 30 days was not reduced after G-CSF implementation (P = .40). Comparatively, the inpatient duration (mean, -1.8 days; P = .030) was reduced among patients with NHL, all of whom were electively admitted for ASCT. For patients with MM at an outpatient-based transplant center, incorporation of G-CSF post-ASCT resulted in reduced time to neutrophil engraftment but did not significantly reduce the time spent in the inpatient setting through day +30.

The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor dose and administration interval after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on early engraftment of neutrophil and platelet

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is one of the treatments for hematologic malignancies. Numerous factors affect the HSCT outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of post-HSCT administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (post-G-CSF) on early neutrophil and platelet engraftment in allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT).

MATERIAL & METHODS

The study was performed on 76 patients diagnosed with AML and ALL. All patients underwent allo-HSCT at Taleghani stem cell transplantation center, Tehran, Iran, from February 2016 to December 2018. Chemotherapy regimens based on patients' conditions were selected between myeloablative and reduced-intensity regimens.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed that the number of administered G-CSF units after HSCT was a time-dependent variable. Statistical analysis before day +11 reported that patients who received G-CSF <14 units had three times better early neutrophil engraftment than those with G-CSF ≥14 (CI 95%, AHR = 3.03, p:0.002). CD3+ cells count <318.5 × 10⁶ /kg was associated with fast platelet engraftment (CI 95%, AHR 2.28, p:0.01).

CONCLUSION

In this study, post-G-CSF stimulation was associated with early engraftment in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Administration of G-CSF beyond 14 units resulted in adverse effects on neutrophil early engraftment. It also appeared that with a reduction in CD3+ cell counts, the likelihood of GVHD decreases, and platelet engraftment occurs earlier. Further investigations in the future are required to determine the factors affecting the process of early engraftment.

G-CSF use post peripheral blood stem cell transplant is associated with faster neutrophil engraftment, shorter hospital stay and increased incidence of chronic GVHD

The use of G-CSF post allogeneic transplant has become a common practice to accelerate neutrophil engraftment. There is some controversy in its use. To further evaluate the effectiveness, we compared outcomes in patients who underwent PBSCT, either with or without the planned use of G-CSF post SCT. Among consecutive 162 patients from October 2012 to October 2014, 65 patients received G-CSF post-PBSCT, and 97 did not. More patients in G-CSF group received MAC (78% vs. 55%). Patients who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median days 11 vs. 14) and shorter post-transplant hospital stay (median days 16 vs. 20, p = 0.001). G-CSF use was associated with a higher rate of extensive chronic GVHD (44.3% vs.61.5%, p = 0.027). G-CSF cost the equivalent of 0.25 hospital days but shortened the initial transplant admission by 4 days. Early cost-benefit may be later offset by the economic burden of chronic GVHD and associated complications.

Bacterial blood stream infections (BSIs), particularly post-engraftment BSIs, are associated with increased mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We analyzed CIBMTR data to evaluate the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and association with overall survival (OS) for Bacterial blood stream infections (BSIs) occurring within 100 days of alloHCT in 2 different phases: pre/peri engraftment (BSI very early phase, BSI-VEP) and BSI post engraftment (BSI occurring between 2 weeks after engraftment and Day100, late early phase, BSI-LEP). Of 7,128 alloHCT patients, 2,656 (37%) had ≥1 BSI by day100. BSI-VEP, BSI-LEP, BSI-Both constituted 56% (n=1492), 31% (n=824), and 13% (n=340) of total BSI, respectively. Starting in 2009 we observed a gradual decline in BSI incidence through 2012 (61% to 48%). Patients with BSI-VEP were more likely to receive a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen with total body irradiation (TBI). NRM was significantly higher in patients with any BSI (RR 1.82 95CI 1.63–2.04 for BSI-VEP, RR 2.46, 95%CI 2.05–2.96 for BSI-LEP, and RR 2.29, 95%CI 1.87–2.81 for BSI-Both) compared with those without BSI. OS was significantly lower in patients with any BSI compared with patients without BSI (RR 1.36, 95%CI 1.26–1.47 for BSI-VEP; RR 1.83, 95%CI 1.58–2.12 for BSI-LEP: RR 1.66, 95%CI 1.43–1.94 for BSI-Both). BSIs within day100 after alloHCT are common and remain a risk factor for mortality.

Administration of G-CSF from day +6 post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents accelerates neutrophil engraftment but does not appear to have an impact on cost savings

G-CSF post-allogeneic HSCT accelerates neutrophil engraftment, but evidence that it impacts on cost-related outcomes is lacking. We performed a retrospective child and adolescent single-center cohort study examining G-CSF administration from Day +6 of allogeneic HSCT vs. ad hoc G-CSF use where clinically indicated. Forty consecutive children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic HSCT were included. End-points were as follows: time to engraftment; incidence of acute and chronic GvHD; number of patients alive at Day +100; 180-day TRM; post-transplant days in hospital; and cost of antimicrobials, TPN, and G-CSF usage. Neutrophil engraftment occurred earlier in the group that received G-CSF from Day +6. There was no difference between groups in any of the other end-points with the following exception: the cost of GCSF was significantly higher in the D + 6 G-CSF group. However, median G-CSF cost in this group amounted to only €280. There was a trend towards reduced cost of antimicrobials in the D + 6 G-CSF group, although this did not reach significance (p = 0.13). The median cost per patient of antimicrobial agents between groups differed by €1116. This study demonstrated the administration of G-CSF on Day +6 in pediatric HSCT to be safe. A further study using a larger cohort of patients is warranted to ascertain its true clinico-economic value.

High incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in a large cohort of related and unrelated allogeneic transplantation patients

Both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The optimal pharmacological regimen for GVHD prophylaxis is unclear, but combinations of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporin or tacrolimus [Tac]) and an antimetabolite (methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) are typically used. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 414 consecutive patients who underwent AHSCT from sibling (SD) or unrelated donors (UD) with Tac/MMF combination, between January 2005 and August 2010. The median follow-up was 60 months. Less than one third of the patients received a reduced-intensity chemoregimen. The incidence of grades III and IV acute GVHD was 22.3% and 36.5% in SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0007). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 47.1% and 52.7% in the SD and UD groups, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 60 months was 33.3% and 46.5% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0016). The incidence of relapse was 22.4% for UD and 28.8% for SD. Five-year overall survival was 43% and 34% in the SD and UD groups, respectively (P = .0183). GVHD was the leading cause of death for the entire cohort. Multivariable analysis showed that 8/8 HLA match, patient's age < 60, and low-risk disease were associated with better survival. The use of Tac/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with a relatively high incidence of severe acute GVHD and NRM in AHSCT from sibling and unrelated donors.

Busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning regimen compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective and multicenter study

Objective

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study to compare busulfan plus fludarabine (BuFlu) with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) as the conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1).

Methods

Totally 108 AML-CR1 patients undergoing allo-HSCT were randomized into BuCy (busulfan 1.6 mg/kg, q12 hours, -7 ~ -4d; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg.d, -3 ~ -2d) or BuFlu (busulfan 1.6 mg/kg, q12 hours, -5 ~ -2d; fludarabine 30 mg/m².d, -6 ~ -2d) group. Hematopoietic engraftment, regimen-related toxicity (RRT), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplant related mortality (TRM), and overall survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

All patients achieved hematopoietic reconstitution except for two patients who died of RRT during conditioning. All patients obtained complete donor chimerism by day +30 post-transplantation. The incidence of total and III-IV RRT were 94.4% and 81.5% (P = 0.038), and 16.7% and 0.0% (P = 0.002), respectively, in BuCy and BuFlu group. With a median follow up of 609 (range, 3–2130) days after transplantation, the 5-year cumulative incidence of TRM were 18.8 ± 6.9% and 9.9 ± 6.3% (P = 0.104); the 5-year cumulative incidence of leukemia relapse were 16.5 ± 5.8% and 16.2 ± 5.3% (P = 0.943); the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 67.4 ± 7.6% and 75.3 ± 7.2% (P = 0.315), and 72.3 ± 7.5% and 81.9 ± 7.0% (P = 0.177), respectively in BuCy and BuFlu group.

Conclusion

Compared with BuCy, BuFlu as a myeloablative condition regimen was associated with lower toxicities and comparable anti-leukemic activity in AML-CR1 patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Leukocyte cell population analysis from the coulter automatic blood cell analyzer DxH800 to monitor the effect of G-CSF

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces the formation of toxic granulation neutrophils (TGNs), which are found in many inflammatory responses. Cell population data (CPD) may be able to clarify the effect of G-CSF, and potentially help doctors in discriminating the effect of G-CSF from other inflammatory situations.

METHODS

To achieve this, we performed analyses of leukocyte CPD from normal controls and healthy donors that had received G-CSF for peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilization (G-CSF group).

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-one subjects were enrolled as normal controls, and 21 subjects were enrolled in the G-CSF group. Mean volume (MN-V)-neutrophils (NE), mean axial light loss (MN-AL2)-NE, and all standard deviation (SD) parameters increased significantly, whereas all light scattering parameters, mean median angle light scatter (MN-MALS)-NE, mean upper median angle light scatter (MN-UMALS)-NE, mean lower median angle light scatter (MN-LMALS)-NE, and mean low angle light scatter (MN-LALS)-NE reduced significantly in the G-CSF group. MN-V-lymphocytes (LY) from the G-CSF group showed no significant difference (P = 0.143), whereas MN-V-monocytes (MO) were significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the discrimination of the G-CSF group from normal controls showed excellent sensitivity in SD-LALS-NE (at 30.85, sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 76.0%), MN-AL2-NE (at 134.5, sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 83.0%), and SD-AL2-NE (at 16.4, sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 95.2). Several CPD parameters of lymphocytes and monocytes, as well as neutrophils can be used as markers for determining the effect of G-CSF.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that many CPD of leukocytes can be considered to be useful parameters of the effect of G-CSF.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

A recent experimental study in mice shed new light on the controversy as to whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Total body irradiation and bone marrow were found to be prerequisites for acute GVHD. This study encouraged us to perform a retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

We compared 260 patients given G-CSF prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with 205 controls transplanted between 1993 and 2003.

RESULTS

G-CSF hastened the engraftment of neutrophils, but that of platelets was delayed (P<0.0001). The proportion of acute GVHD of grades II to IV was 29% in the G-CSF group and 19% in the controls (P<0.01) and that of chronic GVHD was 54% and 43%, respectively (P=0.019). G-CSF increased acute and chronic GVHD in patients preferentially conditioned with chemotherapy. Unexpectedly, it exacerbated acute GVHD in recipients of peripheral blood stem cells and enhanced chronic GVHD in bone marrow recipients. A multivariable analysis showed that acute GVHD (hazards ratio=1.52, P=0.03) and chronic GVHD (hazards ratio=1.51, P=0.004) were associated with G-CSF. There was no significant difference between study groups regarding nonrelapse mortality, relapse, or survival.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF increased acute and chronic GVHD in patients treated with chemotherapy but did not affect relapse or survival.

Optimal use of G-CSF administration after hematopoietic SCT

After hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), G-CSF is commonly used to enhance stem cell engraftment to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with prolonged neutropenia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal use of G-CSF after high-dose chemotherapy followed by HSCT. This review was performed to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of G-CSF after autologous and allogeneic HSCT. Studies investigating the use of G-CSF in comparison to control (observation or placebo), early vs delayed initiation of G-CSF, and other approaches driven by patient-specific parameters to identify optimal use of G-CSF have been reviewed. Various outcomes such as neutrophil and platelet engraftment, post-transplant length of hospital stay, post-transplant complications such as infection and GVHD, and survival have been assessed. Finally, we provide the level of evidence for each of the outcomes analyzed while evaluating strategies for using G-CSF in patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Filgrastim in Patients with Haematological Malignancies Undergoing Matched-related Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Introduction

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may aid engraftment post high-dose chemo-/radiotherapy in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT); however, the effects of G-CSF on graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), relapse, and survival are not well defined.

Methods

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study, the effects of the G-CSF Filgrastim on neutrophil and platelet recovery, and on clinical outcomes were evaluated. Patients (12–55 years) receiving an allogeneic BMT for a haematological malignancy were randomized to receive Filgrastim 5 µg/kg or placebo. Study treatment was continued until patients achieved an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L, or until day 42.

Results

Fifty-one patients (Filgrastim, N = 25; placebo, N = 26) were evaluable. Patients treated with Filgrastim had significantly faster engraftment with ANC ≥0.5 × 10⁹/L being achieved after a median (range) of 15.0 (1.0–22.0) days vs. 19.0 (15.0–28.0) days for placebo (P< 0.0001). The incidence of GvHD was comparable for both groups. During the limited follow-up (2 years), Filgrastim had no adverse effect on mortality and possibly reduced the rate of relapse.

Granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors in allografts: Uses, misuses, misconceptions, and future applications

Despite more than 10 years experience using growth factors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), their state in this has not been elucidated. Most studies show that they accelerate myeloid recovery, regardless of whether they are instituted on day 0 or day 10 after transplant. However, this does not correlate with an improvement in the outcome. One disadvantage is that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis is associated with slower platelet engraftment due to an increase in platelet aggregation. There is also no agreement as regards the value of G-CSF given as prophylaxis after ASCT, the effects on graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and the survival rate. A large retrospective study from Europe showed that patients with acute leukemia who received bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings and were treated with G-CSF ran a higher risk of acute and chronic GVHD and transplant-related mortality, while the survival and the leukemia-free survival rates were reduced. In contrast, a meta-analysis of 18 small studies showed no evidence of an increase in acute and chronic GVHD, using G-CSF as prophylaxis after ASCT. Two studies from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research showed contradictory data. When G-CSF is given to the recipient as prophylaxis, the levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor-alpha increase, which aggravates GVHD. When it is given to the donor, G-CSF polarizes T cells to produce T-helper cell-2 cytokines, which reduce GVHD after transplantation. G-CSF has no effect on relapse. Available findings suggest that there is no indication to use G-CSF as prophylaxis after ASCT.

Relationships between hematological recovery and overall survival in older adults undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The advancement of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation techniques and the increase in frequency of hematological malignancy in older patients are expected to expand the indications to include more elderly patients. We investigated the problem of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) in patients over 40 years old.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 21 consecutive patients (13 males and 8 females) over 40 years old who underwent allo-BMT at our center during the past 12 years.

RESULTS

The patients had a median age of 46 years, and 5 patients were over 50 years old. There were 8 cases of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), 5 cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), 6 cases of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and 2 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The 3-year overall survival rate was 43.0%. Overall survival was associated with recovery of platelets in less than 30 days and recovery of neutrophil counts in less than 15 days. We did not observe any severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or regimen-related toxicities. Twelve patients died of transplantation-related diseases.

CONCLUSION

A faster recovery of the neutrophil and platelet counts was significantly associated with overall survival. Decreasing transplantation-related death, particularly by infection control, in allo-BMT in patients over age 40 is an important problem.

The effect of hematopoietic growth factors on the risk of graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis

The effect of hematopoietic growth factors on neutrophil recovery after allogeneic transplantation is well-recognized. Recent laboratory studies demonstrated that these cytokines may also modify T-cell and dendritic cell function, but whether the effect is strong enough to alter the risk of GVHD is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of G-CSF or GM-CSF on the risk of nonhematopoietic outcomes after allogeneic transplantation. A search of the literature from 1986 to present yielded 18 publications in which data were provided for cohorts receiving growth factor vs either placebo or no therapy. These included nine prospective randomized studies, eight retrospective cohort studies, and one case-control study comprising a total of 1198 patients. The publication types were heterogeneous with regard to demographic and treatment characteristics, although within publications, comparative groups were generally balanced. The pooled risk ratio estimates with use of growth factor was 1.08 (95% CI 0.87-1.33, P=0.48) for grades 2-4 acute GVHD, 1.22 (95% CI 0.80-1.86, P=0.99) for grades 3-4 acute GVHD, and 1.02 (95% CI 0.82-1.26, P=0.87) for chronic GVHD. This analysis did not detect a significant change in the risk of acute or chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation when hematopoietic growth factors were used to shorten the initial period of neutropenia.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes adhesion of neutrophils

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is well known for its ability to drive the maturation and mobilization of neutrophils. G-CSF also appears to have the potential to activate functions of mature neutrophils, influencing recruitment at sites of inflammation and tissue injury. We investigated the ability of G-CSF to stimulate adhesion of isolated blood neutrophils. G-CSF induced significant adherence to intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 that was both macrophage antigen-1 (Mac-1) and leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 dependent. The kinetics of G-CSF-stimulated adhesion to ICAM-1 peaked at 11 min without detectable surface upregulation of Mac-1. This was in marked contrast to chemokines, in which peak activation of adhesion is seen within 1 min of stimulation. In contrast to chemokine-induced adhesion, G-CSF stimulation was not inhibited by pertussis toxin. G-CSF also augmented the attachment of neutrophils to activated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) through specific effects on neutrophils, because HUVEC appear to lack functional G-CSF receptors.