Controversy in multiple myeloma transplants: tandem autotransplants and mini-allografts

Current status of stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Stem cell transplantation for myeloma has become a standard of care for newly diagnosed patients. Current evidence favors tandem transplants for those patients not achieving a complete or very good partial response (<90%) after the first transplant. Transplantation is safe and has been shown to prolong survival even in patients 65 to 70 years of age. Whether the new agents thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib will have an impact on the survival advantage of stem cell transplantation is unknown.

Prognostic factors for survival after autologous transplantation: a single centre experience in 133 multiple myeloma patients

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has an established role in the treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to analyse the impact of selected prognostic parameters on the survival of patients with MM after ASCT. The new International Staging System (ISS) was also evaluated. A total of 133 MM patients were transplanted in our centre between 1995 and 2002. Following ASCT, 35% of patients were in complete remission (CR) and 60% were in partial remission (PR). The median progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival from transplantation were 29.5 and 68.8 months, respectively. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 3%. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with significantly shorter OS were lack of CR after transplant (P = 0.002, hazard ratio (HR): 3.1), stage 3 according to ISS (P = 0.001, HR: 3.0) and age at transplant over 60 years (P = 0.035, HR: 2.0). The status of disease before ASCT did not significantly affect PFS and OS after transplantation. We conclude that ASCT is a safe and effective procedure in MM patients, associated with low TRM. The survival after ASCT was dependent on response after ASCT, stage according to ISS and age.

Pharmacotherapy of multiple myeloma: an economic perspective

Since new treatments have recently been proposed for patients with multiple myeloma, the aim of this article is to review the main innovations in this therapeutic area and to examine the cost-effectiveness ratio. Innovative approaches include autologous transplantation and thalidomide, which are both utilised as induction or salvage treatments. According to a randomised trial conducted in 1996, the survival after autologous transplantation seems to be better than that following standard therapy; however, this result has not been confirmed by a recent study. Thalidomide has been found to be effective for relapsed or refractory myeloma and, more recently, also as induction therapy. Preliminary cost-effectiveness assessments about autologous transplantation and thalidomide have given promising results; yet one regulatory problem with thalidomide is that, both in Europe and in the US, the drug has not yet been approved for this indication.

Subcutaneous plasmacytomas with tropism to sites of previous trauma in a multiple myeloma patient treated with an autologous bone marrow transplant

We report the case of a 59-year-old woman with Durie-Salmon stage IIIB IgGkappa multiple myeloma (MM), who presented 83 days after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with multiple subcutaneous plasmacytomas. These lesions were confined exclusively to sites where the patient had sustained local trauma. The patient had no pre-transplant history of extramedullary disease and no evidence of plasma cells in the peripheral blood at any time throughout the course of her disease. This case represents the first report of refractory MM presenting as multiple subcutaneous plasmacytomas with specific tropism to sites of previous trauma. Selection of tumor cell subclones with unique chemokine receptor expression profiles that may explain this clinical observation is discussed.

Idarubicin containing regimen in multiple myeloma: preliminary results of a pilot study using a modified "TANDEM" transplant program

Tandem autologous transplant actually represents a challenge in multiple myeloma treatment, but the best conditioning regimen is still under investigation. With the aim of evaluating the feasibility of a modified tandem transplant strategy, we treated 10 multiple myeloma patients after conventional first line chemotherapy with a two step conditioning regimen consisting of high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) followed by high-dose melphalan (180 mg/m2) together with indarubicin (15 mg/sqm2 c.i. x 3 days) both with peripheral stem cell support. At first transplant, the median age wasyears, performance status was good and disease status was CR in 2 patients and PR in the rest. At the end of the first transplant, 70% of patients achieved CR and only mild toxicity was observed. After the second transplant further improvement of the response rate was obtained with 90% CR. However, we observed three toxic early infection-related deaths from CMV and legionella pneumonia at day + 17, +26, +54 after transplantation. Although this schedule seems to be effective in terms of response rate, the 30% TRM imposes an anthracycline dose-reduction with careful patient selection. This approach could reduce the toxic effects and maintain the efficacy of therapy at the same time.

Non-myeloablative transplantation

The concept of utilizing enhanced immunosuppression rather than myeloablative cytotoxic conditioning has allowed the engraftment of allogeneic stem cells from related and unrelated donors with lower early transplant-related mortality (TRM) and morbidity. This approach shifts tumor eradication to the graft-vs-host immune response directed against minor histocompatibility antigens expressed on tumor cells. This is not without risk, as the long-term effects of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), it's treatment, or resulting complications and immunodeficiency may be life threatening. However, this approach does allow the application of a potentially curative procedure to elderly or medically infirm patients who would not tolerate high-dose conditioning regimens. Section I, by Dr. Sandmaier, describes the current use of nonmyeloablative regimens and matched related or unrelated donors for the treatment of patients with CLL, CML, acute leukemia, MDS, lymphoma, and myeloma. In Section II, Dr. Maloney discusses the use of cytoreductive autologous followed by planned non-myeloablative allografts as treatment for patients with myeloma or NHL. This tandem transplant approach has a lower TRM than conventional high dose allografting. The nonmyeloablative allograft may allow the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) immune response to eradicate the minimal residual disease that causes nearly all patients with low-grade NHL or myeloma to relapse following autologous transplantation. In Section III, Dr. Mackinnon discusses the risks and benefits of T cell depletion strategies to prevent acute GVHD, while retaining GVT activity by planned donor lymphocyte infusions. Finally, in Section IV, Dr. Shizuru discusses the relationship between GVHD and GVT activity. Future studies, employing a greater understanding of these issues and the separation of GVHD from GVT activity by immunization or T cell cloning, may allow nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation to be safer and more effective.