Comparison of Effects of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin on Plasma Coenzyme Q10 in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Results From a Crossover Study

Impact of pitavastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin: a distributed network analysis of 10 real-world databases

BACKGROUND

Statin treatment increases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM); however, data directly comparing the risk of NODM among individual statins is limited. We compared the risk of NODM between patients using pitavastatin and atorvastatin or rosuvastatin using reliable, large-scale data.

METHODS

Data of electronic health records from ten hospitals converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (n = 14,605,368 patients) were used to identify new users of pitavastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin (atorvastatin + rosuvastatin) for ≥ 180 days without a previous history of diabetes or HbA1c level ≥ 5.7%. We conducted a cohort study using Cox regression analysis to examine the hazard ratio (HR) of NODM after propensity score matching (PSM) and then performed an aggregate meta-analysis of the HR.

RESULTS

After 1:2 PSM, 10,238 new pitavastatin users (15,998 person-years of follow-up) and 18,605 atorvastatin + rosuvastatin users (33,477 person-years of follow-up) were pooled from 10 databases. The meta-analysis of the HRs demonstrated that pitavastatin resulted in a significantly reduced risk of NODM than atorvastatin + rosuvastatin (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.87). In sub-analysis, pitavastatin was associated with a lower risk of NODM than atorvastatin or rosuvastatin after 1:1 PSM (HR 0.69; CI 0.54-0.88 and HR 0.74; CI 0.55-0.99, respectively). A consistently low risk of NODM in pitavastatin users was observed when compared with low-to-moderate-intensity atorvastatin + rosuvastatin users (HR 0.78; CI 0.62-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective, multicenter active-comparator, new-user, cohort study, pitavastatin reduced the risk of NODM compared with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin.

Pitavastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Pitavastatin is the newest statin on the market, and the dose-related magnitude of effect of pitavastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of pitavastatin on the surrogate markers: LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. To compare the effect of pitavastatin on surrogate markers with other statins.  Secondary objectives To quantify the effect of various doses of pitavastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.  SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for trials up to March 2019: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2019), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCT and controlled before-and-after studies evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pitavastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from RCT and controlled before-and-after studies into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. Withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE) information was collected from the RCTs. We assessed all included trials using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of allocation (selection bias), blinding (performance bias and detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other potential sources of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-seven studies (five RCTs and 42 before-and-after studies) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pitavastatin in 5436 participants. The participants were of any age with and without cardiovascular disease, and pitavastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 1 mg to 16 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pitavastatin on blood HDL cholesterol, which was increased by 4% on average by pitavastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg/day to 16 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 33.3% to 54.7%, total cholesterol by 23.3% to 39.0% and triglycerides by 13.0% to 28.1%. For every two-fold dose increase, there was a 5.35% (95% CI 3.32 to 7.38) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 3.93% (95% CI 2.35 to 5.50) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 3.76% (95% CI 1.03 to 6.48) decrease in blood triglycerides. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to other statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. For the placebo group, there were no participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 109 subjects and for all doses of pitavastatin, there were three participants who withdrew due to an adverse effect per 262 subjects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pitavastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, pitavastatin is about 6-fold more potent than atorvastatin, 1.7-fold more potent than rosuvastatin, 77-fold more potent than fluvastatin and 3.3-fold less potent than cerivastatin. There were not enough data to determine risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects due to pitavastatin.

Combining Ubiquinol With a Statin May Benefit Hypercholesterolaemic Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common causes of death in Western society. Recent results underscore the utility of coenzyme Q₁₀ (CoQ₁₀) addition to standard medications in order to reduce mortality and to improve quality of life and functional capacity in chronic heart failure (CHF). The rationale for CoQ₁₀ supplementation in CHF is two-fold. One is the well-known role of CoQ₁₀ in myocardial bioenergetics, and the second is its antioxidant property. Redox balance is also improved by oral supplementation of CoQ₁₀, and this effect contributes to enhanced endothelium-dependent relaxation. Previous reports have shown that CoQ₁₀ concentration is decreased in myocardial tissue in CHF and by statin therapy, and the greater the CoQ₁₀ deficiency the more severe is the cardiocirculatory impairment. In patients with CHF and hypercholesterolaemia being treated with statins, the combination of CoQ₁₀ with a statin may be useful for two reasons: decreasing skeletal muscle injury and improving myocardial function. Ubiquinol, the active reduced form of CoQ₁₀, presents higher bioavailability than the oxidised form ubiquinone, and should be the preferred form to be added to a statin. The combination ezetimibe/simvastatin may have advantages over single statins. Since ezetimibe reduces absorption of cholesterol and does not affect CoQ₁₀ synthesis in the liver, the impact of this combination on CoQ₁₀ tissue levels will be much less than that of high dose statin monotherapy at any target low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level to be reached. This consideration makes the ezetimibe/statin combination the ideal LDL-lowering agent to be combined with ubiquinol in CHF patients. However, particular caution is advisable with the use of strategies of extreme lowering of cholesterol that may negatively impact on myocardial function. All in all there is a strong case for considering co-administration of ubiquinol with statin therapy in patients with depressed or borderline myocardial function.

Mendelian randomization: Its impact on cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors are inheritable. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome are found in around 1 in 1000 base pairs, and this may affect the genetic variety of individuals. During meiosis, any genetic information is randomized and is independent of other characteristics. In a Mendelian randomization study (MRS), a genetic variant associated with biomarker is used as a proxy for the biomarker, and the outcomes are compared between the groups harboring the effect alleles and a group with the reference allele. An MRS using variants of both rare and modest effect sizes and variants of common and lower effect sizes provides an understanding of risk factors and their causality of cardiovascular disease; for example, an individual possessing an allele associated with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) exhibits lower risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, the log-transformed reduction rates of CAD are linearly correlated with the reduction value of LDL-C. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) removes cholesteryl esters from peripheral tissues, including atherosclerotic plaque to the liver. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are inversely associated with the frequency of the occurrence of CAD. However, genetic variants, which are only associated with higher HDL-C levels, do not decrease the frequency of myocardial infarction. This fact shows that HDL-C level is not a cause but a biomarker of CAD. Discoveries of rare variants in Mendelian disorders resulted in the successful development of drugs for the general population. An MRS may also predict the pharmacological effectiveness and adverse side effects of novel drugs targeting specific molecules. An MRS could become a standard process to be performed before the development of novel drugs. Furthermore, future guidelines for the prevention of CAD should consider the genetic information of individuals, which will result in precision medicine for cardiovascular diseases.

Statins and risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus: A real-world cohort study using a clinical research database

Although concern regarding the increased risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after statin treatment has been raised, there has been a lack of evidence in real-world clinical practice, particularly in East Asians. We investigated whether statin use is associated with risk for NODM in Koreans. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the clinical research database from electronic health records. The study cohort consisted of 8265 statin-exposed and 33,060 matched nonexposed patients between January 1996 and August 2013. Matching at a 1:4 ratio was performed using a propensity score based on age, gender, baseline glucose levels (mg/dL), and hypertension. The comparative risks for NODM with various statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) were estimated by both statin exposure versus matched nonexposed and within-class comparisons. The incidence of NODM among the statin-exposed group (6.000 per 1000 patient-years [PY]) was higher than that of the nonexposed group (3.244 per 1000 PY). The hazard ratio (HR) of NODM after statin exposure was 1.872 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.432-2.445). Male gender (HR, 1.944; 95% CI, 1.497-2.523), baseline glucose per mg/dL (HR, 1.014; 95% CI, 1.013-1.016), hypertension (HR, 2.232; 95% CI, 1.515-3.288), and thiazide use (HR, 1.337; 95% CI, 1.081-1.655) showed an increased risk for NODM, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker showed a decreased risk (HR, 0.774; 95% CI, 0.668-0.897). Atorvastatin-exposed patients showed a higher risk for NODM than their matched nonexposed counterparts (HR, 1.939; 95% CI, 1.278-2.943). However, the risk for NODM was not significantly different among statins in within-class comparisons. In conclusion, an increased risk for NODM was observed among statin users in a practical healthcare setting in Korea.

Effects of simvastatin on glucose metabolism in mouse MIN6 cells

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of simvastatin on insulin secretion in mouse MIN6 cells and the possible mechanism. MIN6 cells were, respectively, treated with 0  μ M, 2  μ M, 5  μ M, and 10  μ M simvastatin for 48 h. Radio immunoassay was performed to measure the effect of simvastatin on insulin secretion in MIN6 cells. Luciferase method was used to examine the content of ATP in MIN6 cells. Real-time PCR and western blotting were performed to measure the mRNA and protein levels of inward rectifier potassium channel 6.2 (Kir6.2), voltage-dependent calcium channel 1.2 (Cav1.2), and glucose transporter-2 (GLUT2), respectively. ATP-sensitive potassium current and L-type calcium current were recorded by whole-cell patch-clamp technique. The results showed that high concentrations of simvastatin (5  μ M and 10  μ M) significantly reduced the synthesis and secretion of insulin compared to control groups in MIN6 cells (P < 0.05). ATP content in simvastatin-treated cells was lower than in control cells (P < 0.05). Compared with control group, the mRNA and protein expression of Kir6.2 increased with treatment of simvastatin (P < 0.05), and mRNA and protein expression of Cav1.2 and GLUT2 decreased in response to simvastatin (P < 0.05). Moreover, simvastatin increased the ATP-sensitive potassium current and reduced the L-type calcium current. These results suggest that simvastatin inhibits the synthesis and secretion of insulin through a reduction in saccharometabolism in MIN6 cells.

Short-term effect of pitavastatin treatment on glucose and lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in fasting and postprandial state using a test meal in Japanese men

Introduction. The objective of this study was to clarify how pitavastatin affects glucose and lipid metabolism, renal function, and oxidative stress. Methods. Ten Japanese men (average age of 33.9 years) were orally administered 2 mg of pitavastatin for 4 weeks. Postprandial glucose, lipoprotein metabolism, and oxidative stress markers were evaluated at 0 and 4 weeks of pitavastatin treatment (2 mg once daily) with a test meal consisting of total calories: 460 kcal, carbohydrates: 56.5 g (226 kcal), protein: 18 g (72 kcal), lipids: 18 g (162 kcal), and NaCl: 1.6 g. Metabolic parameters were measured at 0, 60, and 120 minutes after test meal ingestion. Results. After administration of pitavastatin, serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, arachidonic acid, insulin, and adjusted urinary excretion of uric acid decreased, whereas creatinine clearance (C_Cr) and uric acid clearance (C_UA) increased. And postprandial versus fasting urine 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine remained unchanged, while postprandial versus fasting isoprostane decreased after pitavastatin treatment. Next, we compared postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism after test meal ingestion before and after pitavastatin administration. Incremental areas under the curve significantly decreased for triglycerides (P < 0.05) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (P < 0.01), while those for apolipoprotein E (apoE), glucose, insulin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein remained unchanged. Conclusion. Pitavastatin improves postprandial oxidative stress along with hyperlipidemia.

Problems and possible solutions for therapy with statins

Despite issues about the value of statins, benefit for high cardiovascular (CV) risk outweighs problems. However, the practitioner must be aware of concerns, be prepared to respond, and justify statin usage. Symptoms of statin-related myopathy are of more concern than stated by pharmaceutical companies. Occurrence of myopathy symptoms, estimated to be up to 10.4%, can decrease statin adherence of high CV risk patients. Dosage modification, or use of pitavastatin, may help the problematic patient. There are concerns that there may be little benefit of statins for primary prevention in women. However, evidence appears to support statin use in women at high CV risk, both in primary and secondary prevention. Abandoning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as a valid target is unwarranted; there is much evidence to support "lower is better." The practitioner must be aware of the complicated processes causing atherosclerosis and when to incorporate new approaches to disease management. Tailoring therapy for CV risk, when indicated, may contribute further to LDL-C reduction. Liver inflammation can occur with statins but is of minimal concern; frequently, statins alleviate the problem. Unless liver transaminases are over three times normal, a statin should be prescribed, if indicated. The net effect of statins on cognition appears to be zero-no harm, no benefit. Despite reports of improved cognition, statins should not be prescribed for this. With diabetes mellitus (DM), statins can increase incidence, but the CV benefit far outweighs any risk. Therefore, statins should be prescribed in DM to reduce CV risk. Statins are a major medical contribution when used appropriately.

Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin: comparative effects on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic patients with dyslipidaemia

The ever increasing interventional CVD outcome studies have resulted in statins being an essential factor of cardiovascular prevention strategies. The JUPITER study in 2008, despite reducing CVD and overall mortality, highlighted an increase in new onset diabetes in the rosuvastatin treated arm. Since then there have been many meta-analyses of the RCTs and the largest carried out by Sattar et al showed a significant increase in the incidence of diabetes during the trials. The findings from the individual studies when comparing the different statins were less clear. A higher statin dosage and risk factors associated with diabetes appeared to predict this phenomenon. There have been many studies investigating the effects of statins on glycaemic control, but again no clear conclusion is apparent. Despite the increase in new onset diabetes observed, the risk is clearly out-weighed by the CVD benefits observed in nearly all the statin trials. Thus, no change is required to any of the prevention guidelines regarding statins. However, it may be prudent to monitor glycaemic control after commencing statin therapy. This review will focus on atorvastatin which is the most widely used statin worldwide and rosuvastatin which is the most efficacious. This will be against a background of the effects of other statins on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic patients.

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and colestimide in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Aggressive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering therapy is important for high-risk patients. However, sparse data exist on the impact of combined aggressive LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), particularly on side effects to changes in plasma coenzyme Q10 and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 levels. We enrolled 17 Japanese patients with heterozygous FH (12 men, 63.9 ± 7.4 years old) with single LDL receptor gene mutations in a prospective open randomized study. Permitted maximum doses of rosuvastatin (20 mg/day), ezetimibe (10 mg/day), and granulated colestimide (3.62 g/day) were introduced sequentially. Serum levels of LDL cholesterol decreased significantly by -66.4% (p <0.001) and 44% of participants achieved LDL cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl. There were no serious side effects or abnormal laboratory data that would have required the protocol to have been terminated except for 1 patient with myalgia. Coadministration of ezetimibe and granulated colestimide further lowered serum LDL cholesterol more than rosuvastatin alone without changing plasma coenzyme Q10 and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 levels. In conclusion, adequate introduction of this aggressive cholesterol-lowering regimen can improve the lipid profile of FH.

Meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy and safety of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidaemia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Pitavastatin is the latest available statin. It has been shown to be effective in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. This meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the effects of pitavastatin on lipid profiles in patients with dyslipidaemia compared with atorvastatin.

METHODS

Clinical trials were identified through electronic searches (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBM review, and the Cochrane Library) up to January 2011 and historical searches of relevant articles. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they were (i) randomized controlled trials that evaluated pitavastatin at the recommended dose vs. atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidaemia, (ii) lasting at least 6weeks, (iii) reporting total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C or triglyceride (TG) levels and (iv) published in English. Treatment effect was estimated with the mean difference in the per cent changes in lipid profiles from baseline to final assessment between pitavastatin and atorvastatin.

RESULTS

Seven trials involving 1529 patients were included. Pitavastatin reduced LDL-C level as effectively as atorvastatin (mean difference 0.97%, 95% CI -0.48% to 2.42%). The reductions in TC and TG levels were also comparable between the two drugs. The mean differences were 1.22% (95% CI -0.55% to 2.99%) and 2.3% (95% CI -1.06% to 5.65%), respectively. However, HDL-C levels increased significantly more with pitavastatin than with atorvastatin (mean difference 1.78%, 95% CI 0.20-3.36%, P=0.03).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Pitavastatin was as effective as atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C, TC and TG levels. Pitavastatin was marginally superior to atorvastatin in increasing HDL-C levels.

Place of pitavastatin in the statin armamentarium: promising evidence for a role in diabetes mellitus

Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, known as statins, have revolutionized the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease prevention. However, there are considerable issues regarding statin safety and further development of residual risk control, particularly for diabetic and metabolic syndrome patients. Pitavastatin is a potent statin with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering effects comparable to those of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. Pitavastatin has a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol raising effect, may improve insulin resistance, and has little influence on glucose metabolism. Considering these factors along with its unique pharmacokinetic properties, which suggest minimal drug–drug interaction, pitavastatin could provide an alternative treatment choice, especially in patients with glucose intolerance or diabetes mellitus. Many clinical trials are now underway to test the clinical efficacy of pitavastatin in various settings and are expected to provide further information.

Pitavastatin: finding its place in therapy

Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Despite the widespread availability of effective lipid-lowering agents, an unacceptably large proportion of patients fail to attain their target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in clinical practice. Reasons for this include undertreatment, poor adherence/persistence with therapy and failure to address non-LDL-C residual risk factors such as high levels of triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations and raised apolipoprotein B: apolipoprotein A1 ratios. Pitavastatin is a novel, well-tolerated statin with a noninferior or superior lipid-lowering efficacy to comparable doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and prava-statin in a wide range of patients with hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidaemia. Compared with other statins, pitavastatin produces consistently greater increases in HDL-C levels that are sustained over the long term. In addition to pravastatin's potent effects on lipid profiles, a number of pleiotropic benefits have been identified that may contribute to a reduction in residual cardiovascular risk in people with dyslipidaemia and could partly account for pitavastatin's ability to regress coronary plaques in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Pitavastatin's unique metabolic profile results in a high efficacy at low (1-4 mg) doses and minimal drug interactions with cytochrome CYP3A4 substrates, making it an excellent choice for people requiring multiple medications. Although future trials are required to assess the impact of pitavastatin treatment on CV morbidity and mortality, studies to date suggest that pitavastatin will play an important role in the future management of dyslipidaemia and in the overall reduction of CV risk.

Impact of bezafibrate and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclass in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia: result from a crossover study

BACKGROUND

We elucidated the difference between the effects of bezafibrate and atorvastatin in hypertriglyceridemia with apoE2/2 and 3/3.

METHODS

An open randomized crossover study consisted of a 4-week treatment period with bezafibrate (400 mg daily) or atorvastatin (10 mg daily) and a 4-week wash-out period.

RESULTS

Bezafibrate significantly decreased serum concentrations of triglyceride (apoE2/2, E3/3: -49.2%, -39.0%) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (+28.5%, +26.1%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Atorvastatin significantly decreased serum concentrations of LDL cholesterol (-34.0%, -30.0%) and triglyceride (-27.6%, -25.8%) in both apoE phenotypes but did not change HDL cholesterol concentrations. Changes in cholesterol in lipoprotein subfractions were not different between apoE2/2 and E3/3. Bezafibrate changed cholesterol distribution from small- to large-sized LDL and from large- to small-sized HDL. On the other hand, atorvastatin decreased cholesterol in all apoB-containing lipoprotein subfractions but did not change any of the HDL subfractions.

CONCLUSION

Bezafibrate and atorvastatin improve atherogenic dyslipidemia in considerably different ways. Extrapolating from the present data, we presume that the combination of these drugs may contribute to reduce LDL-C/HDL-C ratio effectively as well as lowering concentrations of serum triglyceride.

Rationale and design of a study to evaluate effects of pitavastatin on Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: the pitavastatin heart failure study (PEARL study)

BACKGROUND

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are known to have pleiotropic effects in addition to their lipid-lowering effect. Many studies have suggested cardioprotective effects of statins, however, recent large-scale clinical trials using rosuvastatin, a hydrophilic statin, have failed to show beneficial effects on cardiovascular events in patients with severe heart failure. We have designed the study to evaluate the effects of pitavastatin, a lipophilic statin, on Japanese patients with mild to moderate heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-seven patients with chronic heart failure were enrolled. We used a prospective, randomized, open-label, and blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) design. Patients aged 20-79 years old with symptomatic (NYHA functional class II or III) heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 45% were randomly allocated to either receive pitavastatin (2mg/day) or not in addition to conventional therapy for heart failure by using the minimization method. Follow-up will be continued until March 2011. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiac death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEARL study will provide important data on the role of pitavastatin in the treatment of Japanese patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure (UMIN-ID: UMINC000000428).

Pitavastatin approved for treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined dyslipidemia

Pitavastatin was first developed in Japan and is expanding the regions in which it is clinically available. A considerable number of clinical studies have been conducted and published to date on the usefulness of pitavastatin for patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidemia. Pitavastatin demonstrates potent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction at low doses of 1–4 mg/day. It also affects the regression of coronary plaques, as observed in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention studies. Moreover, the persistent, long-term high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation observed in the populations treated with pitavastatin is worthy of further attention. The reported improvements in lipid profiles are consistent among the studies conducted in Japan, Korea, Thailand, and Europe. In light of accumulating clinical experience worldwide, pitavastatin is now expected to establish its position for preventing and treating cardiovascular disease.

Pitavastatin: evidence for its place in treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, are the most potent pharmacologic agents for lowering total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). They have become an accepted standard of care in the treatment of patients with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention) and also those at increased risk of cardiovascular events. There are currently six statin drugs commercially available in the US. Although they are chemically similar and have the same primary mechanisms of action in lowering TC and LDL-C, there are differences in their efficacy or potency, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, and individual tolerability. Considering the numbers of patients who need LDL-C-lowering therapy and questions of individual tolerance and therapeutic response, having a variety of agents to choose from is beneficial for patient care. This paper presents background information on statin treatment and reviews data regarding a new agent, pitavastatin, which has recently been approved for clinical use.

Critical appraisal of the role of pitavastatin in treating dyslipidemias and achieving lipid goals

Pitavastatin is a potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and efficient hepatocyte low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) receptor inducer, producing robust reduction of the serum LDL-C levels, even at a low dose. Pitavastatin and its lactone form are minimally metabolized by CYP enzymes, and are therefore associated with minimal drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Pitavastatin 2 to 4 mg has potent LDL-C-reducing activity, equivalent to that of atorvastatin 10 to 20 mg; several clinical trials have revealed consistently superior high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) elevating activity of pitavastatin than that of atorvastatin. Pitavastatin-induced HDL-C elevation has been shown to be sustained, even incremental, in long-term clinical trials. Pitavastatin was as well-tolerated as atorvastatin or simvastatin in double-blind randomized clinical trials. Two-year long-term safety and effectiveness of pitavastain has been confirmed in a large-scale, prospective post-marketing surveillance. The safety and efficacy profile of pitavastatin is favorable for the treatment of dyslipidemia, especially in metabolic syndrome patients. In addition to control of LDL-C, adequate control of triglyceride (TG) and HDL-C, hypertension and hyperglycemia is also necessary in metabolic syndrome patients. Pitavastatin produces adequate control of LDL-C and TG, along with potent and incremental HDL-C elevation, with a low frequency of DDIs.