Orbital exenteration for invasive skin tumours

Survival After Orbital Exenteration for Primary Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced periorbital cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) may require orbital exenteration, which is highly morbid. As immunotherapy develops, orbit preservation may become widespread, and data benchmarking survival with current standard-of-care surgery and radiotherapy are essential to the integration of this emerging method into modern treatment paradigms. This study aimed to determine the survival of patients after orbital exenteration for cSCC and investigate contributing factors. It was hypothesized that postoperative radiotherapy would be associated with improved survival.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with T3 and T4 cSCC undergoing orbital exenteration. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 40 patients with a median age of 61.5 years who met the criteria. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; p = 0.019) and residual disease (HR, 9.00; p = 0.003) were associated with worse survival. Postoperative radiotherapy (HR, 0.003; p < 0.001) was associated with improved survival. Perineural, lymphovascular, and bony invasion and T and N stage were not associated with survival. Survival with postoperative radiotherapy was 94 % at 1 year, 87 % at 2 years, and 84 % at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The oncologic outcomes of orbital exenteration with postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cSCC are good. However, amelioration of the morbidity caused by resection of the eye would be ideal. Data to support immunotherapy as a sole therapy are currently limited, but a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgical treatment may facilitate orbit-preserving treatment in the future.

Periocular sebaceous carcinoma: updates in the diagnosis, treatment, staging, and management

Periocular sebaceous carcinoma (PSC) is a rare, aggressive, and potentially metastatic adnexal malignancy. Due to the ability of PSC to resemble several benign and malignant conditions, diagnosis is often delayed or mistaken. In addition, even with a known diagnosis, choosing the right treatment is still an open debate. For this reason, we decided to review the most up-to-date literature on PSC and propose a dedicated procedural protocol to help clinicians when dealing with PSC. A PubMed search was carried out using the terms "Sebaceous Carcinoma", "Adnexal Periocular Cancer", "Sebaceous Carcinoma AND eyelid", "Periocular Sebaceous Carcinoma", and "Ocular Adnexa". Pertinent studies published in English from 1997 up to December 2022 were compared to the selection criteria and if suitable, included in this review. Through the initial search, 84 articles were selected. Of these, 36 were included in the final study. Several papers explored different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies regarding PSC diagnosis and management. In light of the current literature review and the multidisciplinary experience of three clinical centers, a dedicated procedural protocol is proposed. PSC diagnosis may be achieved through accurate clinical evaluation, but it requires histopathologic confirmation, which can be challenging. Dermoscopy, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, and optical coherence tomography may facilitate PSC clinical examination, while immunohistochemistry stains may support histological diagnosis. Appropriate disease staging is necessary before choosing the treatment, as local disease requires radically different treatment compared to advanced disease. In addition, recent innovations in nonsurgical treatments, including radio-chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, may be a viable option in the most challenging cases.

Head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers: surgical management and debated issues

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review critically assesses the current literature and guidelines, aiming to clarify some of the most important factors that impact surgical strategies of head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), focusing on squamous, basal, and Merkel cell carcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments underscore the complexity of treatment for NMSC, particularly in the head and neck region. There is a lack of high-level evidence for the management of these tumors, especially in advanced stages. The need to tailor the extent of surgical margins and parotid/neck management to different histotypes, considering the varying risk factors for recurrence, is beginning to emerge in the literature. Moreover, the role of immunotherapy and targeted therapies for locally advanced disease, alongside traditional treatment options, is progressively growing.

SUMMARY

NMSCs represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies with varying treatment complexities and prognoses. Management of NMSC is evolving towards an increasingly personalized strategy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic framework.

Review of recent advances in managing periocular skin malignancies

Management of cutaneous malignancies can be particularly challenging when they are located in the periocular region. The standard of care for localized disease is complete surgical excision, but this may not be possible without significant disruption to visual structures and facial appearance. Definitive radiation may be an option for some patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo surgery. Advances in systemic treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic skin cancers in the past 10 years have prompted investigation into neoadjuvant treatment of periocular cancers. The use of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted therapies have all been reported with varying degrees of success. For many patients, targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors should be considered depending on the cancer type, symptoms, and goals with the input of a multidisciplinary cancer care team. In this article, we systematically review the latest updates in surgical, radiotherapeutic, and medical management of periocular malignancies.

Virtual Reality Planning in Reconstructive Surgery for Orbital Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using ImmersiveTouch Platform: Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Virtual reality (VR) is emerging as an effective and intuitive surgical planning and 3D visualization tool. Digital surgical planning is the gold standard for planning the placement of implants in maxillofacial prosthetics, but the field lacks a platform exclusively designed to perform the task. Virtual reality planning (VRP) specific for maxillofacial prosthetics offers the clinician improved control of the presurgical planning and the potential to limit the need to adapt other advanced segmentation software. Furthermore, the virtual plan can be directly translated to the patient through custom 3D printed (3DP) surgical guides and visual aids. To the best of our knowledge, this article outlines the development of the world's first virtual reality planning platform and workflow for pre-operatory planning within a VR environment for clinical use specific to facial prosthetics and anaplastology.

METHOD

The workflow was applied to managing 2 patients presenting with unilateral total exenteration and severe contracture enucleation, respectively (n=2). A cone-beam CT was acquired for each patient, and their data set was directly imported into the ImmersiveView Surgical Plan VR environment (ImmersiveTouch Inc, Chicago, IL). The clinicians virtually selected appropriately sized craniofacial implants and placed the implants in the desired orientation. Various measurement tools are available to aid in clinical decision-making. The ideal location of craniofacial implants was set according to an orbital and auricular prosthetic reconstruction. The resultant VR plan was exported for 3DP. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the proposed VRP treatment. The workflow's data accuracy was validated postoperatively by comparing posterative CT data and the proposed VRP. Analysis was performed using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium).

RESULT

It takes, on average, 10 minutes to place 4 implants in the virtual reality space. The 3DP files resulting from VRP take ~2 hours to print and are constructed with a biocompatible resin appropriate for clinical use as surgical guides. Our user-friendly VRP workflow allows for an accurate simulation of surgical and nonsurgical procedures with an average displacement in XYZ of 0.6 mm and an SD of 0.3 mm. In addition, VRP is an excellent tool to simulate the craniofacial placement procedure and improves unsupervised self-learning teaching.

CONCLUSION

VRP is an exciting tool for training clinicians and students in complex surgical procedures. This study shows the promising applicability and efficiency of VR in clinical planning and management of facial rehabilitation. Patients allowed to interact with VR have been engaged, which would aid their treatment acceptance and patient education. A valuable advantage of surgical simulation is the reduced costs associated with renting instruments, buying implant dummies, and surgical hardware. The authors will explore VR to plan and treat surgical and nonsurgical reconstructive procedures and improve soft tissue manipulation. This study outlines the development of an original platform and workflow for segmentation, preoperative planning, and digital design within a VR environment and the clinical use in reconstructive surgery and anaplastology.

Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma with Orbital Invasion: Update on Management and Treatment Advances

Purpose

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant periocular tumor. It is associated with exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and its incidence is gradually increasing. It may occasionally display more aggressive behavior and result in orbital or intracranial invasion. Mortality from periocular BBC with orbital invasion is very low, but the associated morbidity can be significant, from disfigurement to blindness. Traditionally, these cases have been treated with orbital exenteration or with radiotherapy (RT), but in recent years, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) have emerged, are effective in more serious cases, and are used primarily or combined with surgery, changing our perspective on the management of these patients.

Methods

We studied 24 cases of periocular BCC with orbital invasion, some primary and others recurrent, which were treated between 2011 and 2021 in the same hospital. All patients had clinical or radiological evidence of orbital invasion. Orbital exenteration was performed on 9/24 of the patients (1 received vismodegib after surgery), and 12/24 were treated, surgically preserving the eyeball, with 3 of them receiving adjuvant vismodegib. Three of the twenty-four patients were treated exclusively with vismodegib (Erivedge®, Genentech).

Results

One patient died due to poor tumor evolution, but the rest evolved favorably and they have had no recurrences. Vismodegib was generally well tolerated, except for in one patient who discontinued treatment due to the side effects.

Conclusions

In advanced BBC with orbital invasion, mutilating surgical treatments such as exenteration or potentially vision-threatening treatments such as RT remain as options. In recent years, however, very promising new medical therapies have emerged, such as HPI, which can be used effectively instead of surgery or in combination with it, preserving the eye and vision, which implies a new approach to treatment.

Exploring vismodegib: A non-surgical breakthrough in the management of advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma

The management of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is challenging due to its proximity to the eyeball. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has emerged as a therapeutic option for locally advanced and metastatic BCC. To critically appraise the relevant evidence, we conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vismodegib for periocular BCC. Thirty-seven trials, including 435 patients, were eligible. No randomized trials were retrieved. Complete and overall clinical response rates were 20-88 % and 68-100 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed at a maximum rate of 14 %. Recurrence rates varied between 0 % and 31 %. The most common side effects were muscle cramps, dysgeusia, weight loss and alopecia. Treatment with vismodegib improved health-related quality of life. In conclusion, vismodegib represents an important novel treatment for advanced periocular BCC, with good response rates and acceptable tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its full potential needs clarification through randomized controlled trials.

Risk Factors for Orbital Invasion in Malignant Eyelid Tumors, Is Orbital Exenteration Still Necessary?

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant skin tumor of the eyelids in Caucasians, followed by squamous cell carcinoma and sebaceous gland carcinoma. The primary treatment for these tumors is radical excision. In cases where malignant eyelid tumors are advanced and have invaded the orbit, orbital exenteration is necessary. In this retrospective study, we aimed to determine the correlation between the risk of orbital infiltration and various factors like tumor location, size, histological type, and patient age. This study revealed that tumors in multiple regions increased the risk of orbital infiltration by 3.75 times. Tumors with a diameter of 21-30 mm raised the likelihood of requiring exenteration by 15.5 times compared to smaller tumors (up to 10 mm). Age was also associated with the likelihood of orbital invasion in periocular tumors. Interestingly, no correlation was found between the histological type of the tumor and the risk of orbital infiltration. Notably, the conjunctiva of the eyeball was the most commonly infiltrated orbital structure, followed by the orbital fat. Timely treatment and well-planned procedures are crucial for patients with malignant periocular skin tumors to avoid multiple reoperations and the potential need for orbital exenteration.

Review of sociodemographic risk factors for presentation with advanced non-melanoma skin cancer

PURPOSE

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) are often localized and associated with an excellent prognosis but a minority present with locally advanced or metastatic disease requiring extensive resection or systemic treatment. Medical factors that increase the risk of advanced skin cancers such as tobacco use, systemic immunosuppression or genetic syndromes have been described but the sociodemographic risk factors are relatively uninvestigated and under reported. In this review a cohort of patients presenting with periorbital NMSC is reviewed for social determinants of health correlated with presentation with advanced disease.

METHODS

Patients presenting with periorbital NMSC during a 10-year period are categorized as advanced (those tumors requiring extensive local resection, sacrifice of the globe or systemic therapy) or non-advanced and demographic features are compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

274 cases of periorbital NMSC were classified as either non-advanced (177) or advanced (97). Patients with public safety net health insurance were twice as likely to present with advanced disease (25% vs 13%). Patients with advanced disease were significantly less likely to be under the care of a primary care physician, lived in economically depressed areas with lower mean household incomes, and lived further from tertiary medical care.

CONCLUSION

Financial and sociodemographic features are strongly associated with presentation with advanced NMSC. Further work is needed to determine which sociodemographic features are independent risk factors. A better understanding of the relevant barriers to care may reduce the burden of advanced disease at presentation in the future.

Orbital Extenteration Defects: Ablative and Reconstructive Flowchart Proposal

ABSTRACT

Orbital exenteration is a radical and disfiguring operation. It is still under debate the absence of correlation between the term describing the resulting orbital defect and the type of reconstruction. Authors' goal was to propose a consistent and uniform terminology for Orbital Exenteration surgery in anticipation of patients' tailored management. Twenty-five patients who underwent orbital exenteration between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed. A parallel comprehensive literature review was carried on. Five different types of orbital exenteration where outlined. Multiple reconstructive procedures were enclosed. An algorithm for orbital reconstruction was proposed based on anatomic boundaries restoration. Eyelid removal was first considered as an independent reconstructive factor, and both orbital roof and floor were indicated as independent reconstructive goals, which deserve different defect classification. In our opinion, this algorithm could be a useful tool for patient counseling and treatment selection, which might allow a more tailored patient care protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Emerging therapeutic options for periorbital and orbital cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Recently, several new therapies have emerged to address locally advanced cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Given the constraints of the ocular adnexa and orbit, this review was designed to discuss the role of these modalities in this region.

METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out to analyze the utility of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies to address these malignancies. The data presented in the identified investigations were analyzed and abstracted.

RESULTS

Multiple novel interventions may be useful in the management of periocular cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, including imiquimod, hedgehog inhibitors, and immunotherapy. While many of these treatments have not been specifically explored in the orbit and ocular adnexa, the literature generally shows favorable response rates. However, adverse events were common in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Several novel treatments may address periorbital cutaneous malignancies, and these therapies may be particularly useful in patients with unresectable disease and those who are poor surgical candidates.

A Systematic Review Article on Orbital Exenteration: Indication, Complications and Reconstruction Methods

Orbital Exenteration is a major surgical procedure that consists of the removal of the orbital bone, orbital fat, eyeball, and its contents including extraocular muscles. It is an extensive and morbid surgical procedure. Our aim is to systematically review the indications, complications and reconstruction methods utilised for orbital exenteration. An objective electronic database search was conducted in PUBMED Central, MeSH, NLM Catalog, Bookshelf, and PUBMED published in 20 years period from 1999 till 2019. A total of 29 articles were shortlisted for the present review. Most of the studies have eyelid and canthus as most common primary site of malignancy leading to orbital exenteration. Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma being most common pathology. Other intraocular pathology was Retinoblastoma and melanoma. There were various reconstruction methods used by different authors and Sino-orbital fistula was most commonly occurring in majority of studies. Inspite of being a morbid surgery, Orbital Exenteration had acceptable survival and good quality of life. The aggressive pathology that requires orbital exenteration worldwide is mostly periorbital skin, sinus, and intraocular malignancies. The morbidity of the procedure is high with many surgical complications. However, in properly selected patients it can give better outcomes and survival.

Lateral orbital wall reconstruction after basal cell carcinoma penetration—Case report

Advanced periorbital basal cell carcinomas may necessitate orbital exenteration and consequent vision loss, which significantly reduces patients’ life quality. Orbital reconstruction is a demanding surgical procedure due to the complex orbital anatomy and vital structures located in the orbit. In this report, we presented an 83-year-old patient with advanced basal cell carcinoma that had expanded into the orbit. An orbitotomy was performed to remove the tumor completely while preserving the eye function. Orbital reconstruction was performed by a standard surgical method using a titanium mesh modeled according to a natural phantom skull. This maintained the eye function and achieved satisfactory facial esthetics.

Subcutaneous pedicled propeller flap for reconstructing the large eyelid defect due to excision of malignancies or trauma

Large eyelid defect after excision of malignancies or trauma is difficult to reconstruct due to special structure and function of the eyelid. In this study, we aimed to present the outcomes of subcutaneous pedicled propeller flap for reconstructing the large eyelid defect after excision of malignancies or trauma. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with eyelid defect due to excision of malignancies or trauma, and undergoing subcutaneous pedicled propeller flap for reconstructing the large eyelid defect, was conducted at our hospital. The clinical data were collected and analyzed. A total of 15 patients were included in the cases series. Nine patients were diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma, 3 patients with epidermoid carcinoma, and 3 patients with trauma. All the defects were successfully covered with this designed flap. There was no flap necrosis in all the cases. No functional problems were observed in all of the cases. At long-term postoperative follow-up, the average score of patients’ satisfaction was good. This subcutaneous pedicled propeller flap is a feasible alternative technique for reconstructing the large eyelid defect after excision of malignancies or trauma. This flap option could avoid the use of free flaps for large defect.

Clinical Outcomes of Orbital Exenteration in Korean Patients with Orbital Malignancies

Purpose: We report the clinical outcomes of Korean patients who were diagnosed with orbital malignancies and underwent orbital exenteration.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the tumor origins, histopathological diagnoses, local/regional recurrences, distant metastases, surgical margin clearances, overall and event-free survivals, and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy statuses of 14 patients who underwent orbital exenteration in our center from February 2009 to March 2020.Results: We enrolled seven men and seven women of mean age at the time of exenteration of 68 years (range, 37 to 80 years). The mean follow-up period was 44.6 months (range, 10 to 133 months). Most tumors had arisen in the eyelid (seven cases, 50.0%). The most common pathological diagnosis was malignant melanoma (five cases, 35.7%). We observed no local or regional recurrence after exenteration, but distant metastases developed in seven cases, of which four were malignant melanomas (80% of all melanomas). Positive surgical margins were observed in six cases (42.9%). The distant metastasis rate was 42.9%; the overall survival rate was 60%. The 1-year overall survival rate was 100%, the 2-year survival rate was 81.8%, and the 5-year survival rate was 56.1%. The 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 100%, the 2-year EFS rate was 72.7%, and the 5-year EFS rate was 49.9%. Nine patients received adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy and six patients received combined chemoradiation.Conclusions: Patients underwent orbital exenteration to treat orbital malignancies and received postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation exhibited differences in clinical outcomes and survival rates depending on the tumor type.

Total eyelid complex sparing orbital exenteration for mucormycosis

Orbital exenteration is a radical surgery which involves complete removal of the orbital contents along with all or parts of the eyelid. However, the eyelid complex can be totally spared in cases of necrotising disease such as mucormycosis without compromising on exposure, or fear of devascularisation of the lids. We describe a total eyelid complex preserving orbital exenteration. Preservation of the total eyelid complex has the potential to speed up the healing process and provide dynamic functional and cosmetic rehabilitation.

Osseointegrated Implants for Orbito-Facial Prostheses: Common Complications and Solutions

PURPOSE

To evaluate anatomical and functional results of osseointegration with magnetic coupling for oculofacial prosthetic rehabilitation after exenteration.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 11 consecutive patients who received orbital reconstruction and oculofacial prosthetic rehabilitation between September 2015 and October 2019. Patient demographics, surgical indications, previous treatment procedures, histopathologic features, and reconstructive procedures were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age was 37.81 ± 23 years (range 5-78 years). The mean follow-up was 23.81 ± 12 months (range 10-48 months). The principal diagnoses were squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelids (n = 2/11), mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus (n = 2/11), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1/11), mucormycosis (n = 1/11), neurofibromatosis (n = 1/11), basosquamous carcinoma (n = 1/11), malign melanoma (n = 1/11), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (n = 1/11), and retinoblastoma (n = 1/11). Six of the patients were repaired by primary closure. Procedures performed to reconstruct the orbital cavity included split-thickness skin graft (n = 2/11), temporalis muscle flap (n = 2/11), and frontalis muscle flap (n = 1/11). Nine of the 11 patients who received orbital implants were successfully rehabilitated by epithesis. Postoperative complications included implant loss (n = 4/11), periprosthetic local infection (n = 3/11), and soft tissue overgrowth around the orbital prosthesis (n = 2/11). All patients had Straumann bone level implant (Basel, Switzerland) osseointegrated titanium implants (3.5 mm) placed in a 2-stage procedure over a span of 3 to 4 months with subsequent successful prosthesis fitting.

CONCLUSION

The reconstructive methods following orbital exenteration, should be customized according to the patients' characteristics such as extension of the orbital defect, bone quality, and expectations to achieve satisfactory results.

Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein-4 and Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 Expression in Orbitally-Invasive Versus Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the expression of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) in nodular and orbitally-invasive forms of basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for CTLA-4 and LAG-3 was performed on the pathology specimens of BCC from orbital exenteration and nodular forms. The numbers of positively-staining cells/×40 field were counted across 5 consecutive fields of each specimen and statistical analysis was performed to calculate the difference in expression between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Nine cases of orbitally-invasive BCC and 6 cases of nodular BCC were studied. The mean numbers of CTLA-4-positively staining cells were 11.51 cells/×40 field (median = 6.60 cells/×40 field, range = 0.4-31.8 cells/×40 field) in invasive BCC and 0.90 cells/×40 field (median = 0.60 cells/×40 field, range = 0.0-2.8 cells/×40 field) in nodular specimens. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0030). The mean number of LAG-3-positively staining cells was 0.58 cells/×40 field (median = 0.0, range = 0.0-2.8 cells/×40 field) in invasive BCC and 3.13 cells/×40 field (median = 0.0, range = 0.0-18.18 cells/×40 field). There was no significant difference in LAG-3 positivity between tumor groups (p = 0.5564).

CONCLUSIONS

CTLA-4 expression was enriched in orbitally invasive BCC compared with nodular forms of BCC, whereas LAG-3 expression did not differ between these entities. CTLA-4 mediated immune suppression may facilitate the development of orbitally invasive BCC. Treatment strategies that use existing medications to target CTLA-4 may decrease the requirement for orbital exenteration and provide enhanced survival outcomes.

Orbital exenteration and reconstruction in a tertiary UK institution: a 5-year experience

PURPOSE

Orbital exenteration is a radical oncological surgery that is usually indicated for advanced primary orbital tumors or invasion from local malignancy. We report a 5-year series from a tertiary head and neck center with particular focus on our ablative and reconstructive approach.

METHODS

We performed a clinicopathological review of patients referred to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Head and Neck multidisciplinary team for management input of an orbital malignancy during the period of 2013 to 2018. Cases involving local invasion from sinonasal malignancy were excluded. The reconstructive approach, perioperative complications, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

27 patients were identified and of those treated surgically, a radical extended orbital exenteration was required in almost half (44.4%), with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common pathology (55.6%). A concurrent neck dissection and parotidectomy were commonly performed with confirmed or suspected regional disease, or in the presence of high-risk pathological features. This approach resulted in favourable 2-year overall survival in these advanced stage cases of 84.6% and disease-free survival of 73.2%, with 92% achieving a negative surgical margin. The majority of treated patients required a free flap reconstruction, especially when an extended exenteration defect or adjuvant treatment was anticipated. The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used donor site, and we present our algorithm for reconstruction of these defects.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to advanced orbital malignancy with a comprehensive approach to surgical resection and reconstruction results in favorable oncological outcomes and addresses functional and cosmetic patient rehabilitation.

Sebaceous carcinoma: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

Sebaceous carcinoma usually occurs in adults older than 60 years, on the eyelid, head and neck, and trunk. In this Review, we present clinical care recommendations for sebaceous carcinoma, which were developed as a result of an expert panel evaluation of the findings of a systematic review. Key conclusions were drawn and recommendations made for diagnosis, first-line treatment, radiotherapy, and post-treatment care. For diagnosis, we concluded that deep biopsy is often required; furthermore, differential diagnoses that mimic the condition can be excluded with special histological stains. For treatment, the recommended first-line therapy is surgical removal, followed by margin assessment of the peripheral and deep tissue edges; conjunctival mapping biopsies can facilitate surgical planning. Radiotherapy can be considered for cases with nerve or lymph node involvement, and as the primary treatment in patients who are ineligible for surgery. Post-treatment clinical examination should occur every 6 months for at least 3 years. No specific systemic therapies for advanced disease can be recommended, but targeted therapies and immunotherapies are being developed.

Orbital invasion routes of non-melanoma skin cancers and survival outcomes

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

Overall non-melanoma head and neck skin cancer has a good prognosis; however, rarely patients have an aggressive variant which results in orbital invasion via perineural spread or direct extension. Despite these consequences, there are limited published studies defining this clinical entity. The main objectives of the current study are to describe orbital invasion patterns of non-melanoma head and neck skin cancers and their impact on survival.

METHODS

Retrospective case series from a tertiary-care, academic institution performed between 2004 and 2014. Demographic and tumour characteristics are reported as well as patterns of orbital invasion, types of treatments received, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 17 consecutive patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and orbital invasion who met inclusion criteria. Average age at orbital invasion diagnosis was 70.8 years old. 76% were male. Mean follow-up time was 28.5 months. Of these patients, 71% had squamous cell carcinoma and 29% had basal cell carcinoma. Brow (41%) was the most common primary sub-site followed by cheek (23%) and temple (12%). 76% of patients had a history of prior treatment. The lateral orbital wall (41%) was the most common site of invasion, followed by the medial orbital wall (29%) and antero-superior invasion (23%). Age, histology, and location of orbital invasion were associated with disease-specific and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Orbital invasion for non-melanoma head and neck skin cancers creates a treatment dilemma and the patterns of invasion are described. In addition, the location of orbital invasion is associated with survival outcomes.

Vismodegib and orbital excision for treating locally advanced basal cell carcinoma

Purpose

Orbital invasion of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a potentially life-threatening condition with high levels of ocular morbidity. Exenteration results in significant disfigurement and permanent loss of vision. We report our experience with a patient who presented with medial orbit invasion of a BCC following 2 previous microscopically adequate local excisions of medial canthal BCC, an adequate Moh’s micrographic surgical excision of the tumor, and radiotherapy. The patient underwent an orbital excision where the tumor was found to have perineural involvement and extend beyond the posterior margin. Following the pathology results of this procedure, the patient opted to try vismodegib (Erivedge®) to delay exenteration for as long as possible.

Observations

A course of vismodegib was taken by the patient with minor side effects (partial alopecia, mild dysgeusia and hyposmia, and minor muscle cramps). Subsequent imaging demonstrated no recurrence of the orbital tumor 29 months after orbital excision.

Conclusion and importance

We demonstrate the use of vismodegib with local orbital excision as an eye-saving alternative to exenteration for advanced orbital metastasis of BCC.

Factors related to survival outcomes following orbital exenteration: a retrospective, comparative, case series

BACKGROUND

Orbital exenteration is a disfiguring procedure that aims to achieve local control. It is commonly a part of the management of malignant orbital tumor which is a life-threatening condition. It is necessary to determine predictive factors associated with overall survival (OS) following orbital exenteration.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative, case series of 39 patients with malignant tumors who underwent orbital exenteration. Patient records were reviewed for age, clinical presentation, preoperative visual acuity (VA), tumor size, surgical margin, tumor invasiveness, recurrent disease, and status of distant metastasis. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess OS and event-free survival (EFS). The predictive factors related to OS were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age was 62.9 years (range, 5.5 to 89.7 years), 68.4% presented with VA < 20/400. The mean size of all tumors was 32 ± 18 mm. Distant metastasis at diagnosis was reported in 11 patients (28.2%). Twenty-two patients died during follow-up. The median OS and EFS were 3.89 years and 3.01 years, respectively. The predictive factors for worse OS on multivariate analysis were preoperative VA < 20/400 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.67, P = 0.003), tumor size larger than 20 mm (aHR 3.14, P = 0.022,) and positive distant metastasis at diagnosis (aHR 15.31, P <  0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic factors for poor survival outcome following orbital exenteration were a preoperative VA < 20/400, tumor size > 20 mm, and distant metastasis at diagnosis mostly due to patient negligence.

Orbital exenteration: Institutional review of evolving trends in indications and rehabilitation techniques

PURPOSE

To determine the changes in indications for orbital exenteration over 20 years and to assess its impact on patient survival. Evolving techniques of rehabilitation of the orbit in our institution were also evaluated.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of hospital records of patients who underwent orbital exenteration from 1995 to 2015 in a tertiary care center. Data extracted included primary location of the tumor, preoperative treatments, interval between initial diagnosis and exenteration, status of surgical margins, presence of metastatic disease, and postoperative survival. The types of prosthesis utilized over the years were also reviewed. Cox regression analysis was performed for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate post-exenteration survival.

RESULTS

Over a 20-year period, orbital exenteration was performed on 100 orbits of 100 patients. The mean age was 39.4 years (range: 2 months to 90 years). The most common indications among 98 malignant causes were retinoblastoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, extraocular extension of uveal melanoma, and conjunctival melanoma. Postoperative survival was significantly related to age and tumor location but independent from gender, surgical margin, histopathological diagnosis, previous treatment modality, and preoperative interval. In the whole cohort, 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 97% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Exenteration appears to be life-saving in children with orbital extension of retinoblastoma. While patients exenterated for malignant eyelid tumors have the best chance of survival, those with orbital extension of uveal melanoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland have the worst prognosis.

Multicentred international review of orbital exenteration and reconstruction in oculoplastic and orbit practice

Background

Orbital exenteration is a disfiguring procedure reserved for life-threatening malignancies. This study examines the clinical course and outcomes of a large series of patients who underwent orbital exenteration for malignant periocular neoplasms.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent orbital exenteration from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2015 at four tertiary referral centres in the USA, Australia and Canada. Demographics, indication for surgery, pathology, surgical technique, reconstruction type and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

Orbital exenteration was performed on 102 patients. The mean age at surgery was 67.5 years. The most common malignant tumours encountered were squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Seventy-six patients (75%) underwent reconstruction with a local myocutaneous flap, twelve with partial-thickness skin grafts (PTSG), or split skin graft, two had a free flap, and one had a dermis fat graft. Sixteen patients had combined procedures of two of the above. Complete removal of the tumour was achieved with clear margins in 81 cases. Of all patients, 72% were alive at 48 months or more.

Conclusion

The majority of orbital exenterations performed in this series were secondary to periocular malignancies with unsuccessful/insufficient previous treatments. Regional myocutaneous flaps, PTSG, full-thickness skin grafts and dermis fat grafts were all highly effective and durable reconstructive options, and were able to withstand radiation therapy without complications.

Eyelid Malignancies- Always Quite Challenging

The diagnosis and management of eyelid cancers are quite challenging. Eyelid tumours are relatively rare diverse group of diseases varied in their presentation and extent. Many benign tumours and inflammatory conditions quite frequently masquerade eyelid cancers. Eyelid cancers are not single entity but comprise a wide range of tumours with extremes of tumour biology from indolent to very aggressive histopathologic types. Compromise on aesthetics and eyelids' indispensable function of protecting the eyes during management, may lead to untoward cosmetic disfigurement and loss of vision. On the other hand, inadequate cancer clearance will also be vision threatening and life threatening due to loco regional recurrence and metastasis. To strike an optimal balance is a challenging task, to achieve 'cancer cure' with maximum preservation of function and cosmetics. In addition, the integration of other modalities of treatment, judicious selection and their sequencing require multidisciplinary discussion and joint management by different specialists. We are presenting four case scenarios, we met with in our teaching hospital with reference to literature review to emphasize that eyelid malignancies are not always simple with respect to diagnosis and management.

Ocular prosthesis incorporating IPS e-max press scleral veneer and a literature review on non-integrated ocular prosthesis

The article highlights a new method for the fabrication of an ocular prosthesis by the incorporation of a ceramic scleral veneer. The steps of fabrication include impression making, wax try-in, performing a "cut-back" on a selected stock eye, insertion of the IPS e-max press scleral veneer, finishing and insertion. It also includes a detailed review on non-integrated ocular prostheses.

Sandwich Fascial Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Evolution or Revolution?

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

The anterolateral thigh perforator flap (ALT) represents the workhorse for most reconstructive efforts in the head and neck regions. The main advantages of this flap are its versatility, the length of the pedicle, and the low morbidity of the donor site. The major drawback is the bulkiness of this flap with the frequent need for secondary revisions. To overcome this, we have developed a novel way to harvest and inset the ALT, called the sandwich fascial ALT flap (SALT).

Methods:

All patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction using the SALT flap from January 2013 to March 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. The SALT flap was harvested as a composite flap including the superficial fascia, the subscarpal fat, and the deep fascia. At the recipient site, the flap was inset with the deep fascia facing out. A split thickness skin graft (± dermal substitute) was used to cover the deep fascia and the pedicle.

Results:

Eleven patients were included: 8 cases of orbital exenteration, 1 case of forehead reconstruction, and 2 cases of palatal reconstruction after radical maxillectomy. Flap survival was 100%. One patient required an early take back for venous thrombosis. The reconstruction was effective in all cases, allowing a prosthetic rehabilitation when required. Donor-site morbidity was minimal.

Conclusions:

The reconstruction of head and neck defects with a bulky fasciocutaneous ALT flap might not be the best option in every case. The SALT flap could represent a valid alternative for selected cases, with encouraging functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Eyelid Presenting as Trigeminal Neuralgia

This paper describes two patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the periocular and periorbital skin who presented with trigeminal neuralgia. Both patients had previous cutaneous SCC of the scalp treated successfully with surgical resection but later presented with neuro-ophthalmic findings suggesting perineural invasion (PNI) of SCC. PNI of SCC in the periocular skin or orbit can lead to devastating effects if malignant cells seed into the orbit and adjacent cranial nerves as our two patients developed an orbital apex syndrome. Patients with a history of SCC of the scalp and forehead who later develop neuro-ophthalmological deficits or patients with persistent ocular symptoms should, in particular, be followed with a low threshold for cutaneous SCC or PNI of recurrent disease. SCC metastasizing into the periocular tissues and orbit by neural invasion is rare and carries a poor prognosis. The urgency for a prompt diagnosis and evaluation by a multidisciplinary team is warranted to prevent untoward outcomes of this skin cancer. 

Orbital exenteration for advanced periorbital non-melanoma skin cancer: prognostic factors and survival

PurposeTo describe prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients who underwent orbital exenteration for periocular non-melanoma cutaneous malignancies.MethodsThe authors performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of all patients who underwent orbital exenteration for non-melanoma periocular cutaneous malignancies at a tertiary care hospital system over a 10-year period. Patient demographics, tumor, and treatment data were recorded. Survival outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank tests were used to test for difference in survival curves among various potential prognostic indicators, and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazards model.ResultsForty-nine patients with an average age of 70.3 years were followed with a median follow-up of 17.5 months. At 2 years the OS was 78% while the DFS was 61%. The mean DFS for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) were 52.6, 39.2 and 28.1 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only positive final surgical margin was predictive of worse outcome (P=0.002). Recurrences were most frequent in the first 2 years.ConclusionsDespite the relatively more aggressive nature of periocular malignancies that have invaded the orbit, orbital exenteration offers an overall 2-year DFS of ~60%. BCC had the greatest mean survival time, however this was not statistically significant. We found worse prognosis with positive final surgical margins and recommend a multidisciplinary surgical approach to achieve complete resection when indicated.

Perception of patient appearance following various methods of reconstruction after orbital exenteration

This article compares the perception of health and beauty of patients after exenteration reconstruction with free flap, eyelid-sparing, split-thickness skin graft, or with a prosthesis. Cross-sectional evaluation was performed through a survey sent to all students enrolled at the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. The survey included inquiries about observer comfort, perceived patient health, difficulty of social interactions, and which patient appearance was least bothersome. Responses were scored from 0 to 4 for each method of reconstruction and an orbital prosthesis. A Friedman test was used to compare responses among each method of repair and the orbital prosthesis for each of the four questions, and if this was significant, then post-hoc pairwise comparison was performed with p values adjusted using Bonferroni's method. One hundred and thirty two students responded to the survey and 125 completed all four questions. Favorable response for all questions was highest for the orbital prosthesis and lowest for the split-thickness skin graft. Patient appearance with an orbital prosthesis had significantly higher scores compared to patient appearance with each of the other methods for all questions (p value < 0.0001). Second highest scores were for the free flap, which were higher than eyelid-sparing and significantly higher compared to split-thickness skin grafting (p value: Question 1: < 0.0001; Question 2: 0.0005; Question 3: 0.006; and Question 4: 0.019). The orbital prosthesis was the preferred post-operative appearance for the exenterated socket for each question. Free flap was the preferred appearance for reconstruction without an orbital prosthesis. Split-thickness skin graft was least preferred for all questions.

Perineural Spread of Head and Neck Cancer: Ophthalmic Considerations

Head and neck malignancies with orbital involvement present difficult decisions to the treating physician. When the spread is perineural, the challenges are greater due to the incipient nature of the spread and the fact that the orbit can also be involved by centrifugal spread from the non-ophthalmic branches of the trigeminal nerve. The disease is often misdiagnosed and the subsequent delay in treatment results in worse outcomes. This article discusses the evaluation of the eye and the many facets of orbital involvement by perineural spread of malignancy including the treatment of complications.

Orbital tumours and tumour-like lesions: exploring the armamentarium of multiparametric imaging

Although the orbit is a small anatomical space, the wide range of structures present within it are often the site of origin of various tumours and tumour-like conditions, both in adults and children. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for the detection, characterization, and mapping of these lesions. This review focuses on multiparametric imaging of orbital tumours. Each tumour is reviewed in relation to its clinical presentation, compartmental location, imaging characteristics, and its histological features. We herein describe orbital tumours as lesions of the globe (retinoblastoma, uveal melanoma), optic nerve sheath complex (meningioma, optic nerve glioma), conal-intraconal compartment (hemangioma), extraconal compartment (dermoid/epidermoid, lacrimal gland tumours, lymphoma, rhabdomysarcoma), and bone and sinus compartment (fibrous dysplasia). Lesions without any typical compartmental localization and those with multi-compartment involvement (veno-lymphatic malformation, plexiform neurofibroma, idiopathic orbital pseudotumour, IgG4 related disease, metastases) are also reviewed. We discuss the role of advanced imaging techniques, such as MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging, fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography CT (FDG-PET CT), and positron emission tomography MRI (MRI PET) as problem-solving tools in the evaluation of those orbital masses that present with non-specific morphologic imaging findings. Main messages/Teaching points • A compartment-based approach is essential for the diagnosis of orbital tumours. • CT and MRI play a key role in the work-up of orbital tumours. • DWI, PET CT, and MRI PET are complementary tools to solve diagnostic dilemmas. • Awareness of salient imaging pearls and diagnostic pitfalls avoids interpretation errors.

Management of periorbital basal cell carcinoma with orbital invasion

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common eyelid malignancy; however, orbital invasion by periocular BCC is rare, and management remains challenging. Established risk factors for orbital invasion by BCC include male gender, advanced age, medial canthal location, previous recurrences, large tumor size, aggressive histologic subtype and perineural invasion. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach with orbital exenteration remaining the treatment of choice. Globe-sparing treatment may be appropriate in selected patients and radiotherapy and chemotherapy are often used as adjuvant therapies for advanced or inoperable cases, although the evidence remains limited. We aim to summarize the presentation and treatment of BCC with orbital invasion to better guide the management of this complex condition.

Orbital Exenteration to Manage Infiltrative Sinonasal, Orbital Adnexal, and Cutaneous Malignancies Provides Acceptable Survival Outcomes: An Institutional Review, Literature Review, and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Orbital exenteration (OE) is an aggressive operative undertaking that results in a disfiguring and dysfunctional outcome for patients. The purpose of our study was to determine the survival outcome for patients who underwent OE for malignant disease that had invaded the orbit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an ambispective cohort study based on a review of the records of 31 consecutive patients who had undergone OE within John Hunter Hospital. The study period was 2006 to 2013. The predictor variables were the demographic, tumor site, and clinicopathologic characteristics that might influence survival. The secondary outcome variable was survival. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the categorical and continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival distribution were plotted. We also performed a review of published studies and a meta-analysis to investigate the nature of OE performed by various surgical disciplines.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients included in the present study, 24 were men and 7 were women. The mean age was 65 years. Of the 31 cases, 15 were squamous cell carcinoma, 8 were basal cell carcinoma, and 8 were a mixture of other pathologic types. The time to median (50%) survival for all patients was 78.4 months. The 1-year survival rate was 93.4% and the 5-year survival rate was 54.1%. Although not statistically significant, notable differences were found in the interval to death with respect to the identification of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and histopathologic features. The review of published studies suggested a difference in the histologic features and location of the disorder treated, the extent of OE undertaken, and the method of reconstruction between the ophthalmology and nonophthalmology surgical disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Although OE results in significant disfigurement and dysfunction, it does provide good survival outcomes, given the extent of disease at presentation, evident in our group of patients. Continuation of the study, with greater numbers of patients, will serve to increase the statistical power of our observations.

Imaging of the Postoperative Orbit

Imaging evaluation of the postoperative orbit remains challenging even for the expert neuroradiologist. This article provides a simplified framework for understanding the complex postoperative appearances of the orbit, in an attempt to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of postoperative computed tomography and MR imaging of the orbit. Readers are familiarized with the normal appearances of common eye procedures and orbit reconstructions to help avoid interpretative pitfalls. Also reviewed are imaging features of common surgical complications, and evaluation of residual/recurrent neoplasm in the setting of oncologic imaging surveillance.

Reliability and Effectiveness of the Manchester Orbital Exenteration Wound Assessment Tool: Inter-Observer Agreement

AIM

To evaluate the inter-observer agreement of the Manchester Orbital Exenteration Wound Assessment Tool (MOEWAT), a tool designed to facilitate grading of healing in exenterated sockets, scores from clinical photographs of exenterated sockets.

METHODS

Existing MOEWAT system was modified to allow grading of clinical photographs. Photographs of 36 different patients at different stages of healing following exenteration were identified. Scores for two masked observers, who independently graded the photographs were compared. The inter-observer agreement of scores was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot, with the average agreement and 95% confidence interval around the mean computed.

RESULTS

The average age of the 36 patients was 66 ± 29 years. Photographs were taken 32 ± 16 months after exenteration. Across all photographs, the averages score given by the first observer (4.3 ± 2.2) and second observer (3.4 ± 1.5) were similar (t = -1.9; p = 0.07). From the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference in score (0.8 ± 1.8) was close to zero, with 95% confidence limits for agreement are indicated by the dashed lines and spanning from -2.6 to 4.3.

CONCLUSION

MOEWAT can be successfully used to stage wound healing in exenterated sockets, with good inter-observer agreement.

Imaging findings of recurrent tumors after orbital exenteration and free flap reconstruction

PURPOSE

Tumors that recur following orbital exenteration may not be evident on clinical examination, highlighting the need for imaging surveillance. The goal of this study was to report the imaging characteristics of recurrent tumors following orbital exenteration and free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 48 patients who underwent orbital exenteration for the treatment of orbital malignancy and identified 17 recurrent tumors in 17 patients. The lesions were assessed for the presence of a soft tissue mass, imaging characteristics, and fluorodeoxyglucose avidity.

RESULTS

The recurrent tumors were detected 1 month to 6 years 10 months (median, 1 year 3 month) after orbital exenteration. On both CT and MRI, all 17 lesions were soft tissue masses at presentation. On CT, the lesions demonstrated heterogeneous to homogeneous to centrally necrotic enhancement; on MRI, the lesions were T1 hypointense to isointense and T2 hypointense to hyperintense. Twelve of the 15 recurrent tumors with available preoperative imaging had an enhancing appearance similar to that of the original tumor. Thirteen of the 17 recurrent tumors were at the margin of a flap placed for reconstruction; the other 4 lesions were remote from the operative site.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent tumors following orbital exenteration and free flap reconstruction demonstrate a wide range of imaging appearances but most often appear as a soft tissue masses often similar in appearance to the primary tumor and arising near the flap margin. Awareness of the imaging features of recurrent disease is important because failure to diagnose recurrence can delay appropriate treatment.

MRI findings of myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps used for reconstruction of orbital exenteration defects

PURPOSE

To facilitate detection of tumor recurrence, the authors reviewed the MRI characteristics of myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous free flaps following orbital exenteration for treatment of orbital or maxillofacial tumors.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the MRI characteristics, including T1 and T2 signal intensity, and enhancement pattern of 28 such flaps.

RESULTS

The study included 17 myocutaneous flaps and 11 fasciocutaneous flaps placed in 28 patients. For 23 flaps, additional imaging was performed after baseline imaging (range, 2-65 months after surgery). On precontrast T1 imaging, 15 of 17 myocutaneous flaps demonstrated a striated appearance similar to that of native muscle. Twenty-six of the 28 flaps in the series were T2 hyperintense. On baseline imaging, 26 flaps showed linear (n = 5), patchy (n = 10), or homogeneous (n = 11) enhancement. No flaps demonstrated mass-like enhancement. Five fasciocutaneous and 5 myocutaneous flaps showed decreased enhancement on follow-up imaging, while 4 myocutaneous flaps showed increased enhancement. Fourteen patients received postoperative radiation, 4 of which demonstrated increased enhancement, which subsequently decreased in 3 flaps. Fourteen of 23 followed flaps became smaller over time.

CONCLUSIONS

On MRI, both myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps placed after orbital exenteration generally demonstrate persistent non-mass-like enhancement and T2 hyperintensity, and both types of flaps may become smaller over time. Head and neck radiologists, ophthalmologic and plastic surgeons, and oncologists should be aware of the range of imaging features of these flaps to avoid misinterpreting the postoperative appearance as tumor recurrence.

Advanced Basal cell carcinoma in a patient with schizoaffective disorder: constraints and management

The approach used by the authors for managing a patient with a schizoaffective disorder and advanced basal cell carcinoma involving the eyelids, orbit, and face is presented. Complexities included the advanced nature of the disease, neglect of the patient's condition due to schizoaffective disorder, the difficulty of obtaining informed consent, the required aggressive surgical intervention, reconstruction, and the necessary management during the postsurgical period. A multidisciplinary team approach with psychiatry, ophthalmology, ear, nose, and throat, plastic surgery, radiation oncology, oncology, legal, and bioethics specialties is required in patients with cognitive disabilities. Curative treatment requires complete excision, reconstruction, and proper postoperative care, which can be prohibitive in a schizophrenic patient from a surgical and ethical perspective. Staging of this condition after proper informed consent with biopsy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging is presented. The options for management are discussed, including surgical intervention and palliative care.