When to refer patients with chronic kidney disease for vascular access surgery: Should age be a consideration?

Clinical impact of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation for vascular access planning

BACKGROUND

Risk-based thresholds for arteriovenous (AV) access creation has been proposed to aid vascular access planning. We aimed to assess the clinical impact of implementing the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) for vascular access referral.

METHODS

A total of 16 102 nephrology-referred chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients from the Swedish Renal Registry 2008-18 were included. The KFRE was calculated repeatedly, and the timing was identified for when the KFRE risk exceeded several pre-defined thresholds and/or the estimated glomerular filtration rate was <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR15). To assess the utility of the KFRE/eGFR thresholds, cumulative incidence curves of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) or death, and decision-curve analyses were computed at 6 and 12 months, and 2 years. The potential impact of using the different thresholds was illustrated by an example from the Swedish access registry.

RESULTS

The 12-month specificity for KRT initiation was highest for KFRE >50% {94.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 94.3-94.7]} followed by KFRE >40% [90.0 (95% CI 89.7-90.3)], while sensitivity was highest for KFRE >30% [79.3 (95% CI 78.2-80.3)] and eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 [81.2 (95% CI 80.2-82.2)]. The 2-year positive predictive value was 71.5 (95% CI 70.2-72.8), 61.7 (95% CI 60.4-63.0) and 47.2 (95% CI 46.1-48.3) for KFRE >50%, KFRE >40% and eGFR <15, respectively. Decision curve analyses suggested the largest net benefit for KFRE >40% over 2 years and KFRE >50% over 12 months when it is important to avoid the harm of possibly unnecessary surgery. In Sweden, 54% of nephrology-referred patients started hemodialysis in a central venous catheter (CVC), of whom only 5% had AV access surgery >6 months before initiation. Sixty percent of the CVC patients exceeded KFRE >40% a median of 0.8 years (interquartile range 0.4-1.5) before KRT initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of using KFRE >40% and KFRE >50% is higher compared with the more traditionally used eGFR threshold <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for vascular access planning.

Association between Timing of Vascular Access Creation and Mortality in Patients Initiating Hemodialysis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

The optimal time for vascular access (VA) creation remains controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry. Adult patients who started receiving hemodialysis in 2007 and had a permanent VA created were included. The exposure of interest was the timing of VA creation, categorized into three groups: early VA creation (defined as creation at least 4 months before hemodialysis initiation), just prior VA creation (creation between 1 and 3 months before hemodialysis initiation), and late VA creation (creation within 1 month of or after hemodialysis initiation). Cox regression analyses were used to compare 1-year all-cause mortality, with late VA creation as the reference group. Owing to the violations of the proportional hazards assumptions, the follow-up period was divided into "early" (1-4 months follow-up) and "late" (5-12 months follow-up) periods.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,280 (15.4%) of 8,322 patients died. Both early creation and just prior creation were associated with lower all-cause mortality in the early period compared with late creation. In the late period, the hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality decreased with earlier VA creation (adjusted HRs [95% confidence intervals]: 0.49 [0.35-0.67] for the early creation group and 0.63 [0.51-0.79] for the just prior creation group).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that VA creation at least 1 month before hemodialysis initiation is associated with lower all-cause mortality in the early period, with earlier VA creation resulting in further mortality reduction in the late period.

Enhancing vascular access planning in CKD: validating the 40% KFRE threshold for predicting ESKD in a French retrospective cohort study

Background

Establishing the optimal timing for creating vascular access in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical and challenging aspect of patient management. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines propose using a 40% 2-year threshold based on the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) for this purpose. However, the effectiveness of this threshold compared with traditional methods, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), is not well-established.

Methods

In this monocentric retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients referred for vascular mapping before arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation between April 2013 and June 2023. The study aimed to compare the ≥40% 2-year KFRE threshold with a <15 mL/min/1.73 m² eGFR threshold for predicting end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We assessed the probability of ESKD, considering death before AVF creation as a competing risk. Discrimination between KFRE and eGFR was evaluated using C-statistics.

Results

The study included 238 patients with a mean age of 65.2 years and a mean eGFR of 13.3 mL/min/1.73 m². Over a median follow-up of 10.7 months, 178 patients developed ESKD, and 21 died before ESKD. Probability of ESKD at 1 year was 77.6% (95% CI 69.9%-85.3%) using a ≥40% 4-variable KFRE threshold versus 65.8% (95% CI 58.3%-73.3%) using a <15 mL/min/1.73 m² eGFR threshold. The C-statistics indicated better predictive ability for the 8-variable KFRE at 6 months [0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.88)], while both 4- and 8-variable KFRE models were effective for 1-year predictions [0.835 (95% CI 0.78-0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.875), respectively]. Sensitivity and specificity analyses favored the ≥40% KFRE threshold over the eGFR threshold.

Conclusions

This study suggests that using a ≥40% 2-year KFRE threshold for planning vascular access in CKD patients is promising and potentially superior to the traditional <15 mL/min/1.73 m² eGFR threshold. This approach may offer a balance between minimizing premature AVF creation and the risk of starting dialysis via a central venous catheter.

Kidney Failure Risk Equation in vascular access planning: a population-based study supporting value in decision making

Background

The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) can play a better role in vascular access (VA) planning in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring hemodialysis (HD). We described the VA creation and utilization pattern under existing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based referral, and investigated the utility of KFRE score as an adjunct variable in VA planning.

Methods

Patients with CKD aged ≥18 years with eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 who chose HD as dialysis modality from January 2010 to August 2020 were included from a population-based database in British Columbia, Canada. Modality selection date was the index date. Exposures were categorized as (i) current eGFR-based referral, (ii) eGFR-based referral plus KRFE 2-year risk score on index date (KFRE-2) >40% and (iii) eGFR-based referral plus KFRE-2 ≤40%. We estimated the proportion of patients who started HD on arteriovenous fistula/graft (AVF/G) within 2 years, indicating timely pre-emptive creation, and the proportion of patients in whom AVF/G was created but did not start HD within 2 years, indicating too-early creation.

Results

Study included 2581 patients, median age 71 years, 60% male. Overall, 1562(61%) started HD and 276 (11%) experienced death before HD initiation within 2 years. Compared with current referral, the proportion of patients who started HD on AVF/G was significantly higher when KFRE-2 was considered in addition to current referral (49% vs 58%, P-value <.001). Adjunct KFRE-2 significantly reduced too-early creation (31% vs 18%, P-value <.001).

Conclusions

KFRE in addition to existing eGFR-based referral for VA creation has the potential to improve VA resource utilization by ensuring more patients start HD on AVF/G and may minimize too-early/unnecessary creation. Prospective research is necessary to validate these findings.

Predialysis Vascular Access Placement and Catheter Use at Hemodialysis Initiation

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines encourage placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula in patients with advanced CKD to avoid initiation of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter. However, the relative merits of predialysis placement of an AV fistula or graft have been poorly studied.

METHODS

This study included 380 patients (mean age 59±14 years, 73% Black patients, 51% male) from a large academic medical center who underwent predialysis placement of an AV fistula (286) or AV graft (94). The study quantified three end points: time from access placement to initiation of dialysis, likelihood of starting hemodialysis without a catheter, and number of vascular access procedures before dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

The eGFR at access surgery was <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 in 87 (23%), 179 (47%), and 114 (30%) patients, respectively. The median time from access surgery to hemodialysis initiation was 69, 156, and 429 days in patients with an eGFR of <10, 10-14, and ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively ( P < 0.001). Hemodialysis was initiated within 2 years of access surgery in 298 (78%) of the patients. Catheter-free hemodialysis initiation was higher in patients with an AV graft versus an AV fistula when the eGFR was <10 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 43%; odds ratio [OR], 9.10 [95% confidence interval, 2.74 to 26.4]) and when the eGFR was 10-14 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (88% versus 54%; OR, 6.05 [2.35 to 15.0]) but similar when the eGFR was ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (90% versus 75%; OR, 3.00 [0.48 to 34.9]). Patients undergoing an AV fistula were more likely to undergo an angioplasty (11% versus 0%, P < 0.001), surgical access revision (26% versus 8%, P < 0.001), a second access placement (16% versus 6%, P = 0.02), and a catheter insertion (32% versus 11%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing vascular access surgery when their eGFR was <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , catheter use at dialysis initiation was much less likely when an AV graft, rather than an AV fistula, was placed.

Is there a role of the kidney failure risk equation in optimizing timing of vascular access creation in pre-dialysis patients?

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to assess the utility of using the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) as an indicator to guide timing of vascular access creation in pre-dialysis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred for vascular access creation had KFRE calculated at the time of assessment and compared to standard criteria for referral. Receiver operating characteristic curves were produced for each parameter. The outcomes at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were used as time points for analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients were assessed, and full data sets were available on 190 (94.6%). Access was created in 156 patients (82.1%) with a fistula in 153 (98.7%). Only 65.7% initiated dialysis within the follow up period. Those patients with an AV access created (n = 156) 37 (23.7%) did not reach end stage over the entire follow up period. Of the remaining patients (n = 119) that reached end stage 72.2% (n = 86) started on an AVF/AVG and 27.7% (n = 33) on a CVC. Using ROC analysis for referral eGFR, ACR and KFRE predicting dialysis initiation predictors resulted in C statistics for eGFR, ACR, and KFRE2 of 0.68 (0.58-0.79), 0.75 (0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (0.62-0.81) at 3 months; 0.73 (0.65-0.81), 0.70 (0.62-0.78), and 0.75 (0.67-0.81) at 6 months; and 0.65 (0.57-0.72); 0.67 (0.59-0.75), and 0.68 (0.61-0.77) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In a group of patients referred for vascular access creation the predictive models are relatively poor when applied to initiation of dialysis. The application of current guidelines to fistula creation appears to result in a high rate of unnecessary fistula formation and non-use. The study requires further evaluation in a test set of patients to confirm these findings and also identify where such risk based approaches may need modification.

Prognostic Significance of Amino Acid and Biogenic Amines Profiling in Chronic Kidney Disease

There is a pressing need for more precise biomarkers of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Plasma samples from 820 subjects [231 with CKD, 325 with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and 264 controls] were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to determine a metabolic profile of 28 amino acids (AAs) and biogenic amines to test their value as markers of CKD risk and progression. The kynurenine/tryptophan ratio showed the strongest correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate values (coefficient = -0.731, p < 0.0001). Models created with orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) containing the metabolic signature showed a high goodness of fit and predictability for controls/CKD (R2X:0.73:R2Y:0.92:Q2:0.92, p < 0.0001) and lower values for CKD/ESKD (R2X:0.56:R2Y:0.59:Q2:0.55, p < 0.0001). Based on generated VIP scores, the most relevant markers for segregating samples into control/CKD and CKD/ESKD groups were citrulline (1.63) and tryptophan (1.47), respectively. ROC analysis showed that the addition of the metabolic profile to a model including CKD classic risk factors improved the AUC from 86.7% (83.6-89.9) to 100% (100-100) for CKD risk (p < 0.0001) and from 63.0% (58.2-67.8) to 96.5% (95.3-97.8) for the risk of progression from CKD to ESKD (p < 0.0001). Plasma concentrations of AAs and related amines may be useful as diagnostic biomarkers of kidney disease, both for CKD risk and for progression of CKD patients to ESKD.

Renal cryoablation combined with prior transcatheter arterial embolization in non-dialysis patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate cryoablation combined with prior transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in non-dialysis patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD undergoing TAE and cryoablation for RCC between May 2012 and October 2021 were included. TAE was selectively performed using iodized oil with absolute ethanol or gelatin sponge 1-14 days before cryoablation. Local efficacy, safety, and changes in renal function were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine patients (seven men and two women; median age, 64 years; range 52-88 years) with nine RCCs (mean diameter, 3.0 ± 1.0 cm; range 1.7-4.7 cm) were included. The mean pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 24.2 ± 5.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 10.4-29.2 ml/min/1.73 m2). The mean amount of contrast medium used in TAE was 58 ± 29 ml (range 40-128 ml). Except in one patient (grade 3 pyelonephritis), no grade ≥ 3 complications occurred. During the follow-up period (median, 18 months; range 7-54 months), no local tumor progression occurred. In two patients with pre-treatment eGFR of < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2, hemodialysis was initiated at 3 and 19 months after cryoablation. At their last follow-up, the remaining seven patients showed a decrease of 6.2 ± 5.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 0.7-17.2 ml/min/1.73 m2) in their eGFR.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation combined with TAE for RCC in non-dialysis patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD was effective and safe, with an acceptable impact on renal function.

The kidney failure risk equation predicts kidney failure: Validation in an Australian cohort

AIMS

Predicting progression to kidney failure for patients with chronic kidney disease is essential for patient and clinicians' management decisions, patient prognosis, and service planning. The Tangri et al Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) was developed to predict the outcome of kidney failure. The KFRE has not been independently validated in an Australian Cohort.

METHODS

Using data linkage of the Tasmanian Chronic Kidney Disease study (CKD.TASlink) and the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), we externally validated the KFRE. We validated the 4, 6, and 8-variable KFRE at both 2 and 5 years. We assessed model fit (goodness of fit), discrimination (Harell's C statistic), and calibration (observed vs predicted survival).

RESULTS

There were 18 170 in the cohort with 12 861 participants with 2 years and 8182 with 5 years outcomes. Of these 2607 people died and 285 progressed to kidney replacement therapy. The KFRE has excellent discrimination with C statistics of 0.96-0.98 at 2 years and 0.95-0.96 at 5 years. The calibration was adequate with well-performing Brier scores (0.004-0.01 at 2 years, 0.01-0.03 at 5 years) however the calibration curves, whilst adequate, indicate that predicted outcomes are systematically worse than observed.

CONCLUSION

This external validation study demonstrates the KFRE performs well in an Australian population and can be used by clinicians and service planners for individualised risk prediction.

Dialysis Access Considerations in Kidney Palliative Care

In this review, we discuss common challenges at the interface between dialysis access planning, prognostication, and patient-centered decision making. Particularly for patients whose survival benefit from dialysis is attenuated by advanced age or other serious illness, knowing the potential complications and anticipated frequency of access procedures is essential for patients and families to be able to conceptualize what life on dialysis will look like. Although starting dialysis with a functioning graft or fistula is associated with reduced infection rates, mortality, hospitalizations, and cost compared with a central venous catheter, these benefits must be weighed against the chance that early access placement in an elderly or seriously ill patient is an unnecessary surgery because the chronic kidney disease never progresses, the patient dies before developing an indication to start dialysis, or, the patient prefers conservative kidney management over dialysis. Kidney palliative care is a growing subspecialty of nephrology focused on helping seriously ill patients navigate complex medical decisions, and may be useful for intensive goals-of-care discussions about treatment and access options for patients with limited anticipated survival because of age or other serious illness.

Ten-year experience of an outpatient clinic for CKD-5 patients with multidisciplinary team and educational support

PURPOSE

To analyze the results of an outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team and educational support for patients with late-stage CKD (lsCKD), to check its possible effect on their outcomes.

METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study on patients followed up in the MaReA (Malattia Renale Avanzata = CKD5) outpatient clinic at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from 2005 to 2015 for at least six months. Trajectory of renal function over time has been evaluated only in those patients with at least four estimations of eGFR before referring to MaReA.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and six patients were enrolled, their mean age was 72 ± 14 years, 59% were males. At the end of the study, 147 (21%) were still on MaReA, 240 (34%) on dialysis, 92 (13%) on very low-protein diet (VLPDs), 13 (2%) on pre-hemodialysis clinic, 23 (3%) improved renal function, 10 (1%) transplanted, 62 (9%) transferred/lost to follow-up, and 119 (17%) died. Optimal dialysis start (defined as start with definitive dialysis access, as an out-patient and without lsCKD complications) occurred in 180/240 (75%) patients. The results showed a slower eGFR decrease during MaReA follow-up compared to previous renal follow-up: - 2.0 vs. - 4.0 mL/min/1.73 m² BSA/year (p < 0.05), corresponding to a median delay of 17.7 months in dialysis start in reference to our policy in starting dialysis. The patient cumulative survival was 75% after 24 months and 25% after 70.

LIMITATIONS

(1) lack of a control group, (2) one-center-study, (3) about all patients were Caucasians.

CONCLUSION

The follow-up of lsCKD patients on MaReA is associated with an optimal and delayed initiation of dialysis.

Outcomes of arteriovenous fistula in elderly patients on maintenance haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal vascular access strategy in elderly patients receiving haemodialysis (HD) remains controversial. We aim to report the outcomes of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in elderly patients initiated on maintenance HD in our centre.

METHODS

Medical records of 688 incident patients initiated on HD from 2010 to 2012 in a tertiary centre were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' characteristics and AVF outcomes were compared among those < 65 years (non-elderly), ≥ 65-75 years (early elderly) and ≥ 75 years (late elderly).

RESULTS

There were 418 non-elderly, 184 early elderly and 86 late elderly patients. There is a higher proportion of brachiocephalic and brachiobasilic fistula created in the late elderly (24.9% vs. 37.0% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.001). The outcomes of accesses created were comparable in the 3 age groups with similar proportions of functional AVFs (80.4% vs. 79.3% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.832) and comparable 1-, 3- and 5-year primary and secondary patency rates (p = 0.351 and 0.282, respectively). However, a longer maturation time (2.78 vs. 2.86 vs. 3.72 months, p = 0.010) and a higher mean number of interventions to assist maturation of the first AVF were required in late elderly patients (0.19 vs. 0.22 vs. 0.35, p = 0.014). Following AVF creation, median patient survival in the non-elderly, early and late elderly was 65.2 vs. 55.1 vs. 49.8 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

AVFs created in elderly patients have comparable outcomes compared to non-elderly patients although more interventions are required to assist maturation with a longer maturation time necessitating early access creation to allow for time needed due to maturation delay.

Roles of telomeres and telomerase in age‑related renal diseases (Review)

Age‑related renal diseases, which account for various progressive renal disorders associated with cellular and organismal senescence, are becoming a substantial public health burden. However, their aetiologies are complicated and their pathogeneses remain poorly understood. Telomeres and telomerase are known to be essential for maintaining the integrity and stability of eukaryotic genomes and serve crucial roles in numerous related signalling pathways that activate renal functions, such as repair and regeneration. Previous studies have reported that telomere dysfunction served a role in various types of age‑related kidney disease through various different molecular pathways. The present review aimed to summarise the current knowledge of the association between telomeres and ageing‑related kidney diseases and explored the contribution of dysfunctional telomeres to these diseases. The findings may help to provide novel strategies for treating patients with renal disease.

An independent validation of the kidney failure risk equation in an Asian population

Predicting the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression facilitates appropriate nephrology care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Previously, the kidney failure risk equations (KFREs) were developed and validated in several cohorts. The purpose of this study is to validate the KFREs in a Korean population and to recalibrate the equations. A total of 38,905 adult patients, including 13,244 patients with CKD stages G3–G5, who were referred to nephrology were recruited. Using the original KFREs (4-, 6- and 8-variable equations) and recalibration equations, we predicted the risk of 2- and 5-year ESRD progression. All analyses were conducted in CKD stages G3-G5 patients as well as the total population. In CKD stages G3–G5 patients, All the original 4-, 6- and 8-variable equations showed excellent areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 and 0.83 for the 2- and 5-year risk of ESRD, respectively. The results of net reclassification improvement, integrated discrimination index and Brier score showed that recalibration improved the prediction models in some cases. The original KFREs showed high discrimination in both CKD stages G3–G5 patients and the total population referred to nephrology in this large Korean cohort. KFREs can be implemented in Korean health systems and can guide nephrology referrals and other CKD-related treatment decisions.

Use of disease embedding technique to predict the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease

The accurate prediction of progression of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is of great importance to clinicians and a challenge to researchers as there are many causes and even more comorbidities that are ignored by the traditional prediction models. We examine whether utilizing a novel low-dimensional embedding model disease2disease (D2D) learned from a large-scale electronic health records (EHRs) could well clusters the causes of kidney diseases and comorbidities and further improve prediction of progression of CKD to ESRD compared to traditional risk factors. The study cohort consists of 2,507 hospitalized Stage 3 CKD patients of which 1,375 (54.8%) progressed to ESRD within 3 years. We evaluated the proposed unsupervised learning framework by applying a regularized logistic regression model and a cox proportional hazard model respectively, and compared the accuracies with the ones obtained by four alternative models. The results demonstrate that the learned low-dimensional disease representations from EHRs can capture the relationship between vast arrays of diseases, and can outperform traditional risk factors in a CKD progression prediction model. These results can be used both by clinicians in patient care and researchers to develop new prediction methods.

Early cannulation of percutaneously created arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulae

INTRODUCTION

The optimal vascular access for most dialysis patients is an arteriovenous fistula and the recognized appropriate process of care for the chronic kidney disease patient is to have the access in place ready for use when renal replacement therapy is required. Unfortunately, as a result of multiple barriers, most patients start dialysis with a catheter and many experience multiple interventions. The recent advent of the percutaneous arteriovenous fistula may offer at least a partial solution to these problems. The purpose of this study was to report of the results of early cannulation of the percutaneous arteriovenous fistula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Early cannulation, less than 14 days post creation, was performed in 14 cases in order to avoid an initial catheter or continued use of a problematic catheter for dialysis. Immediately post access creation, blood flow ranged from 491 to 1169 mL/min (mean = 790 mL/min). Ultrasound was used to map potential cannulation sites prior to use. Cannulation was performed using plastic fistula cannulas.

RESULTS

Early cannulation was successful in this cohort of cases except for one cannulation complication. Dialysis treatments were otherwise uncomplicated. Primary patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 76%, 76%, and 66%, respectively. Assisted primary patency for the same intervals was 100%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. Cumulative patency was 100% at all three-time intervals.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the possibility of successful early cannulation with a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula can be considered as an additional factor in making this access a reasonable alternative for a surgically created arteriovenous fistula in appropriate patients.

Early cannulation of percutaneously created arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulae

INTRODUCTION

The optimal vascular access for most dialysis patients is an arteriovenous fistula and the recognized appropriate process of care for the chronic kidney disease patient is to have the access in place ready for use when renal replacement therapy is required. Unfortunately, as a result of multiple barriers, most patients start dialysis with a catheter and many experience multiple interventions. The recent advent of the percutaneous arteriovenous fistula may offer at least a partial solution to these problems. The purpose of this study was to report of the results of early cannulation of the percutaneous arteriovenous fistula.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Early cannulation, less than 14 days post creation, was performed in 14 cases in order to avoid an initial catheter or continued use of a problematic catheter for dialysis. Immediately post access creation, blood flow ranged from 491 to 1169 mL/min (mean = 790 mL/min). Ultrasound was used to map potential cannulation sites prior to use. Cannulation was performed using plastic fistula cannulas.

RESULTS

Early cannulation was successful in this cohort of cases except for one cannulation complication. Dialysis treatments were otherwise uncomplicated. Primary patency at 3, 6, and 12 months was 76%, 76%, and 66%, respectively. Assisted primary patency for the same intervals was 100%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. Cumulative patency was 100% at all three-time intervals.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the possibility of successful early cannulation with a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula can be considered as an additional factor in making this access a reasonable alternative for a surgically created arteriovenous fistula in appropriate patients.

The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on The Association between Vascular Access Type and Clinical Outcomes among Elderly Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

The optimal vascular access type for elderly hemodialysis patients is controversial. We evaluated the impact of comorbidity burden on the association between vascular access type and mortality risk among 23,100 hemodialysis patients aged ≥65 years from the Korean Society of Nephrology End-Stage Renal Disease registry data. Subjects were stratified into tertiles according to the simplified Charlson comorbidity index (sCCI), and the survival and hospitalization rates were compared with respect to vascular access type: arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), and central venous catheter (CVC). Among all tertiles of sCCI, CVC use showed highest risk of mortality than AVF use. In the lowest to middle tertile, no difference was observed in survival rates between the use of AVF and AVG. However, in the highest tertile, AVG use showed higher risk of mortality than AVF use. When subjects were classified according to a combination of sCCI tertile and access type (AVF vs. AVG), patients with the highest CCI with AVG showed 1.75-folded increased risk of mortality than those with the lowest sCCI with AVF. Hospitalization rates due to access malfunction were highest in patients with CVC in all sCCI tertiles. In the highest tertile, patients with AVG showed increased rates of hospitalization compared to those with AVF due to access malfunction. However, hospitalization rates due to access infection were highest in patients with AVG in all tertiles. The use of AVF may be of benefit and switching to AVF should be considered in elderly hemodialysis patients with a high burden of comorbidity.

Hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly-getting it right

Choosing the optimal hemodialysis vascular access for the elderly patient is best achieved by a patient-centered coordinated multidisciplinary team approach that aligns the patient's end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, i.e., the individual treatment approach (supportive care, time-limited or long-term kidney replacement therapy, or combination thereof) and selection of dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis) with the most suitable dialysis access. Finding the right balance between the patient's preferences, the likelihood of access function and survival, and potential complications in the context of available resources and limited patient survival can be extremely challenging. The framework for choosing the most appropriate vascular access for the elderly presented in this review considers the individual end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, the patient life expectancy, the likelihood of access function and survival, the timing of dialysis relative to access placement, prior access history, and patient preference. This complex decision-making process should be dynamic in order to accommodate patients' changing needs and life and health circumstances. Effective and timely communication between the patient, their caregivers, and treating team is key to delivering truly patient-centered care. Delivering this care also requires overcoming the limitations of the currently available evidence that is predominantly based on observational data with its inherent risks of bias. While challenging, future randomized controlled studies exploring the risks, benefits, costs, and timing of placement of available access types in the elderly are required to help us "get it right" for our patients.

Integrating Risk-Based Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in the Community: Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial

Background:

A risk-based model of care for managing patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) has been successfully integrated into nephrology care pathways in several jurisdictions. However, as most patients with CKD can be managed in primary care, the next pertinent steps would be to integrate the KFRE into primary care pathways.

Objective:

Using a risk-based approach for guiding CKD care in the primary care setting, the objective of the study is to develop, implement, and evaluate tools that can be used by patients and providers.

Design:

This study is a multicenter cluster randomized control trial.

Setting:

Thirty-two primary care clinics belonging to the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) across Manitoba and Alberta.

Patients:

All patients at least 18 years old or older with CKD categories G3-G5 attending the participating clinics; we estimate each clinic will have an average of 185 patients with CKD.

Methods:

Thirty-two primary care clinics will be randomized to receive either an active knowledge translation intervention or no intervention. The intervention involves the addition of the KFRE and decision aids to clinics’ Data Presentation Tool (DPT), as well as patient-facing visual aids, a medical detailing visit, and sentinel feedback reports. Control clinics will only be exposed to current guidelines for CKD management, without active dissemination.

Measurements:

Data from the CPCSSN repository will be used to assess whether a risk-based care approach affected management of CKD. Primary outcomes are as follows: the proportion of patients with measured urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and the proportion of patients being appropriately treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers. Secondary outcomes are as follows: the optimal management of diabetes (hemoglobin A1C <8.5%, and the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in CKD G3 patients), hypertension (office blood pressure <130/80 for patients with diabetes, 140/90 for those without), and cardiovascular risk (statin prescription); prescriptions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In addition, in a substudy, we will measure CKD-specific health literacy and trust in physician care via surveys administered in the clinic post-visit. At the provider level, we will measure satisfaction with the risk prediction tools. Lastly, at the health system level, outcomes include cost of CKD care, and appropriate referrals for patients at high risk of kidney failure based on provincial guidelines. Primary and secondary outcomes will be measured at the patient level and enumerated at the clinic level 1 year after the intervention implementation, except for decline in eGFR, which will be measured 2 years postintervention.

Limitations:

Limitations include scalability of the proposal in other health care systems.

Conclusions:

If successful, this intervention has the potential to improve the management of patients with CKD within Canadian primary care settings, leading to health and economic benefits, and influencing practice guidelines.

Trial Registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03365063

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Vascular Access Type and Clinical Outcomes among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal type of initial permanent access for hemodialysis among the elderly is controversial. Duration of central venous catheter dependence, patient comorbidities, and life expectancy are important considerations in whether to place an arteriovenous fistula or graft. We used an observational study design to compare clinical outcomes in elderly patients who initiated hemodialysis with a central venous catheter and subsequently had an arteriovenous fistula or graft placed.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We identified 9458 United States patients ages ≥67 years old who initiated hemodialysis from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 with a central venous catheter and no secondary vascular access and then received an arteriovenous fistula (n=7433) or graft (n=2025) within 6 months. We evaluated key clinical outcomes during the 6 months after vascular access placement coincident with high rates of catheter use and used a matched propensity score analysis to examine patient survival.

RESULTS

Central venous catheter dependence was greater in every month during the 6-month period after arteriovenous fistula versus graft placement (P<0.001). However, rates of all-cause infection-related hospitalization (adjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.99; P=0.01) and bacteremia/septicemia-related hospitalization (adjusted relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.02) were lower in the arteriovenous fistula versus graft group as was the adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.80; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite extended central venous catheter dependence, elderly patients initiating hemodialysis with a central venous catheter who underwent arteriovenous fistula placement within 6 months had fewer hospitalizations due to infections and a lower likelihood of death than those receiving an arteriovenous graft.

A Survey of Canadian Nephrologists Assessing Prognostication in End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently have a relatively poor prognosis with complex care needs that depend on prognosis. While many means of assessing prognosis are available, little is known about how Canadian nephrologists predict prognosis, whether they routinely share prognostic information with their patients, and how this information guides management.

OBJECTIVE

To guide improvements in the management of patients with ESRD, we aimed to better understand how Canadian nephrologists consider prognosis during routine care.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A web-based multiple choice survey was designed, and administered to adult nephrologists in Canada through the e-mail list of the Canadian Society of Nephrology. The survey asked the respondents about their routine practice of estimating survival and the perceived importance of prognostic practices and tools in patients with ESRD. Descriptive statistics were used in analyzing the responses.

RESULTS

Less than half of the respondents indicated they always or often make an explicit attempt to estimate and/or discuss survival with ESRD patients not on dialysis, and 25% reported they do so always or often with patients on dialysis. Survival estimation is most frequently based on clinical gestalt. Respondents endorse a wide range of issues that may be influenced by prognosis, including advance care planning, transplant referral, choice of dialysis access, medication management, and consideration of conservative care.

LIMITATIONS

This is a Canadian sample of self-reported behavior, which was not validated, and may be less generalizable to non-Canadian health care jurisdictions.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, prognostication of patients with ESRD is an important issue for nephrologists and impacts management in fairly sophisticated ways. Information sharing on prognosis may be suboptimal.

End-stage renal disease versus death in a Portuguese cohort of elderly patients: an approach using competing event analysis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is higher in elderly, but mortality outweighs the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Our aim was to identify prognostic markers for ESRD or death in elderly CKD, within a competing-risk analysis. This is a longitudinal study of consecutive newly referred patients with CKD ages 65 years, followed until the time of the first event (ESRD or death), using a competing-risk analysis. A modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI) was subdivided into subgroups (0-2, 3-4, ≥5). Patients were followed for hospitalizations that occurred prior to the outcomes. Among 416 patients, age 76±8 years, 52% male, median estimated glomerular filtration rate of 32 mL/min per 1.73 m², 50% had diabetes, and 67% cardiovascular disease. Over a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 36 patients progressed to ESRD (8.7%) and 103 died (24.8%). Older age (subdistribution HR (sHR)=1. 06; p<0.001), creatinine≥1.6 mg/dL (sHR=2.03, p=0.004), hemoglobin <11 g/dL (sHR=1.91, p=0.003), mCCI score≥5 (sHR=3.01, p<0.001) and having one or more hospitalizations (sHR=1.73, p<0.001) were associated with death before ESRD. The independent predictors for ESRD with competing risk of death were: lower age (sHR=0.94; p=0.009), creatinine≥1.6 mg/dL (sHR=3.26, p=0.006), hemoglobin <11 g/dL (sHR=2.15, p=0.027), peripheral vascular disease (sHR=3.45, p=0.001) and having one or more hospitalizations (sHR=1.56, p=0.031). Elderly referred patients with CKD are near threefold more likely to die than progress to ESRD. A competing-risk framework based on available clinical and laboratory data may discriminate between those outcomes and could be used as a decision-making tool.

Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care

The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. In the United States, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI) has been influential in improving use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Currently, prevalent AVF rates are near the goal of 66% set forth by the original FFBI. However, central venous catheter (CVC) rates remain very high in the United States in patients initiating hemodialysis, nearly exceeding 80%. A new direction of the of the FFBI has focused on strategies to reduce CVC use, and subsequently the FFBI has now been renamed the "Fistula First-Catheter Last Initiative". However, an AVF may not be the best vascular access in all hemodialysis patients, and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and CVCs may be appropriate and the best access for a subset of hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, there still remains very little emphasis within vascular access initiatives and guidelines directed towards evaluation of the individual patient context, specifically patients with poor long-term prognoses and short life expectancies, patients with multiple comorbidities, patients who are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients of elderly age with impaired physical and cognitive function. Given the complexity of medical and social issues in advanced CKD and ESRD patients, planning, selection, and placement of the most appropriate vascular access are ideally managed within a multidisciplinary setting and requires consideration of several factors including national vascular access guidelines. Thus, the evolution of the FFBI should underscore the need for multidisciplinary health teams with a major emphasis placed on "the right access for the right patient" and improving the patient's overall quality of life.

Dialysis Access as an Area of Improvement in Elderly Incident Hemodialysis Patients: Results from a Cohort Study from the International Monitoring Dialysis Outcomes Initiative

BACKGROUND

Commencing hemodialysis (HD) using a catheter is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes, and early conversion from central-venous catheter (CVC) to arteriovenous fistula/graft (non-CVC) improves outcomes. We investigated CVC prevalence and conversion, and their effects on outcomes during the first year of HD in a multinational cohort of elderly patients.

METHODS

Patients ≥70 years from the MONDO Initiative who commenced HD between 2000 and 2010 in Asia-Pacific, Europe, North-, and South-America and survived at least 6 months were included in this investigation. We stratified by age (70-79 years [younger] vs. ≥80 years [older]) and compared access types (at first and last available date) and their changes. We studied the association between access at initiation and conversion, respectively, and all-cause mortality using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression, and predicted the absence of conversion from catheter to non-CVC using adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

In 14,966 elderly, incident HD patients, survival was significantly worse when using a CVC at all times. In Europe, the conversion frequency from CVC to non-CVC was higher in the younger fraction. Conversion from non-CVC to CVC was associated with worsened outcomes only in the older fraction.

CONCLUSION

These results corroborate the need for early HD preparation in the elderly HD population. Treatment of elderly patients who commence HD with a CVC should be planned considering aspects of individual clinical risk assessment. Differences in treatment practices in predialysis care specific to the elderly as a population may influence access care and conversion rate.

Optimal timing for vascular access creation

Many guidelines recommend that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients should have a permanent vascular access, preferably an autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF), at the start of renal replacement therapy. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients still start hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC). On the other hand, there are increasing numbers of patients in whom an AVF has been created, but who never actually end up on dialysis, as well as a substantial number of patients in whom creation of a vascular access has been attempted unsuccessfully.To improve this situation, timely exploration to assess suitability for and creation of preemptive AVF should be promoted. Decision to construct an AVF should depend on the likelihood and rate of progression to ESRD. For this goal, some reliable prediction models are available. Also, the likelihood that such an attempt will result in a successful outcome should be taken into account, but suitable validated models to accurately make such estimates are lacking. Next to patient-specific factors, some local conditions such as easy access to a vascular surgeon should also be incorporated in the decision-making process between the nephrology team and the patient.

Establishing patient-specific criteria for selecting the optimal upper extremity vascular access procedure

OBJECTIVE

The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative and Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative call for the indiscriminate creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) without providing patient-specific criteria for vascular access selection. Although the U.S. AVF rate has increased dramatically, several reports have found that this singular focus on increasing AVFs has resulted in increased AVF nonmaturation/early failure and a high prevalence of catheter dependence. The objective of this study was to determine the appropriateness of vascular access procedures in clinical scenarios constructed with combinations of relevant factors potentially influencing outcomes.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Accordingly, a comprehensive literature search was performed and a synthesis of results compiled. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied to 2088 AVF and 1728 AVG clinical scenarios with varying patient characteristics. Eleven international vascular access experts rated the appropriateness of each scenario in two rounds. On the basis of the distribution of the panelists' scores, each scenario was determined to be appropriate, inappropriate, or indeterminate.

RESULTS

Panelists achieved agreement in 2964 (77.7%) scenarios; 860 (41%) AVF and 588 (34%) AVG scenarios were scored appropriate, 686 (33%) AVF and 480 (28%) AVG scenarios were scored inappropriate, and 542 (26%) AVF and 660 (38%) AVG scenarios were indeterminate. Younger age, larger outflow vein diameter, normal or obese body mass index (vs morbidly obese), larger inflow artery diameter, and higher patient functional status were associated with appropriateness of AVF creation. Older age, dialysis dependence, and smaller vein size were associated with appropriateness of AVG creation. Gender, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were not associated with AVF or AVG appropriateness. Dialysis status was not associated with AVF appropriateness. Body mass index and functional status were not associated with AVG appropriateness. To simulate the surgeon's decision-making, scenarios were combined to create situations with the same patient characteristics and both AVF and AVG options for access. Of these 864 clinical situations, 311 (36%) were rated appropriate for AVG but inappropriate or indeterminate for AVF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that patient-specific situations exist wherein AVG is as appropriate as or more appropriate than AVF. These results provide patient-specific recommendations for clinicians to optimize vascular access selection criteria, to standardize care, and to inform payers and policy. Indeterminate scenarios will guide future research.

Predictors of Initiation for Predialysis Arteriovenous Fistula

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal timing of predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery remains uncertain. We evaluated factors associated with hemodialysis initiation in patients undergoing predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery and derived a model to predict future initiation of dialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Our study retrospectively identified 308 patients undergoing predialysis arteriovenous fistula creation at a large medical center in 2006-2012 to determine whether they initiated hemodialysis. Multiple variable logistic regression analyzed which demographic and clinical factors predicted initiation of dialysis within 2 years of arteriovenous fistula surgery. A receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was used to quantify the predictive value of preoperative factors on the likelihood of initiating hemodialysis within 2 years.

RESULTS

Overall, hemodialysis was initiated within 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in 119 (39%), 175 (57%), and 211 (68%) patients, respectively. Using multiple variable logistic regression, four factors were associated with hemodialysis initiation at 2 years: eGFR at access surgery (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.64 per 5 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001), diabetes (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 5.15; P=0.003), GFR trajectory (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.17 per 3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year; P=0.01), and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.71 per 1 U; P<0.001). eGFR alone had a moderate predictive value for dialysis initiation (area under the curve =0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.76; P<0.001), whereas the full model had a higher predictive value (area under the curve =0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.88; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of initiating hemodialysis within 2 years of predialysis arteriovenous fistula surgery is associated with eGFR at access surgery, diabetes, GFR trajectory, and magnitude of proteinuria. The combined use of all four variables improves the ability to predict future hemodialysis compared with the use of eGFR alone.

Arteriovenous Vascular Access Selection and Evaluation

When making decisions regarding vascular access creation, the clinician and vascular access team must evaluate each patient individually with consideration of life expectancy, timelines for dialysis start, risks and benefits of access creation, referral wait times, as well as the risk for access complications. The role of the multidisciplinary team in facilitating access choice is reviewed, as well as the clinical evaluation of the patient.

New Insights into Dialysis Vascular Access: What Is the Optimal Vascular Access Type and Timing of Access Creation in CKD and Dialysis Patients?

Optimal vascular access planning begins when the patient is in the predialysis stages of CKD. The choice of optimal vascular access for an individual patient and determining timing of access creation are dependent on a multitude of factors that can vary widely with each patient, including demographics, comorbidities, anatomy, and personal preferences. It is important to consider every patient's ESRD life plan (hence, their overall dialysis access life plan for every vascular access creation or placement). Optimal access type and timing of access creation are also influenced by factors external to the patient, such as surgeon experience and processes of care. In this review, we will discuss the key determinants in optimal access type and timing of access creation for upper extremity arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

Finding the right hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly: a patient-centered approach

Vascular access preparation in the elderly with advanced kidney disease needs a nuanced approach. Recent studies indicate that age, along with comorbidity, modify the outcomes associated with the type of access placed or used for hemodialysis (HD). Options ranging from permanent vascular access (arteriovenous fistula [AVF] or graft [AVG]) to tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC) or conservative medical care must be weighed on an individual basis and reassessed longitudinally. The potential benefits derived from AVF compared with AVG and TCVC are not always seen in this population. Herein, we review the literature concerning patient and vascular access outcomes in the elderly with advanced kidney disease or on HD. A multidimensional approach that takes into consideration the burden of comorbid diseases, functional status and patient-reported views on quality of life ought to be incorporated in the process of vascular access planning in the elderly.

Predialysis nephrology care and dialysis-related health outcomes among older adults initiating dialysis

BACKGROUND

Predialysis nephrology care is associated with lower mortality and rates of hospitalization following chronic dialysis initiation. Whether more frequent predialysis nephrology care is associated with other favorable outcomes for older adults is not known.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients ≥66 years who initiated chronic dialysis in 2000-2001 and were eligible for VA and/or Medicare-covered services. Nephrology visits in VA and/or Medicare during the 12-month predialysis period were identified and classified by low intensity (<3 visits), moderate intensity (3-6 visits), and high intensity (>6 visits). Outcome measures included very low estimated glomerular filtration rate, severe anemia, use of peritoneal dialysis, and receipt of permanent vascular access at dialysis initiation and death and kidney transplantation within two years of initiation. Generalized linear models with propensity score weighting were used to examine the association between nephrology care and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 58,014 patients, 46 % had none, 22 % had low, 13 % had moderate, and 19 % had high intensity predialysis nephrology care. Patients with a greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care had more favorable outcomes (all p < 0.001). In adjusted models, patients with high intensity predialysis nephrology care were less likely to have severe anemia (RR = 0.70, 99 % CI: 0.65-0.74) and more likely to have permanent vascular access (RR = 3.60, 99 % CI: 3.42-3.79) at dialysis initiation, and less likely to die within two years of dialysis initiation (RR = 0.80, 99 % CI: 0.77-0.82).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of older adults treated with chronic dialysis, greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care was associated with more favorable outcomes.

Patient Education and Support During CKD Transitions: When the Possible Becomes Probable

Patients transitioning from kidney disease to kidney failure require comprehensive patient-centered education and support. Efforts to prepare patients for this transition often fail to meet patients' needs due to uncertainty about which patients will progress to kidney failure, nonindividualized patient education programs, inadequate psychosocial support, or lack of assistance to guide patients through complex treatment plans. Resources are available to help overcome barriers to providing optimal care during this time, including prognostic tools, educational lesson plans, decision aids, communication skills training, peer support, and patient navigation programs. New models are being studied to comprehensively address patients' needs and improve the lives of kidney patients during this high-risk time.

Preparation of the Dialysis Access in Stages 4 and 5 CKD

Patients with Stages 4 and 5 CKD are optimally managed within a multidisciplinary care setting. This provides an opportunity to create a "patient centered" approach to renal replacement modality options and conservative care. The care team engages with the patient and caregivers to assist with the understanding of their health status, modality and vascular access selection, and overall living with the comorbidity of chronic illness. A systematic approach to provision of education, modality, and access selection, are in part, driven by the patient's expected survival and need for dialysis, the risks and benefits with different modalities, and access and adaptation to their preferences and home situations. Dialysis access education should be included in all education programs so that patients can consider risks and benefits of all modalities. Decision support interventions have been effective in reducing decisional conflict and informed values-based decision-making. For both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, timing of the surgical referral and access creation should be individualized based on the rate of CKD progression, risk of complications, and ease of access to surgical services. The health care team should support the patients' decision balancing risks and benefits, as well as their lifestyle, values, beliefs, and preferences.

Vascular access for elderly hemodialysis patients: what should we aim for?

PURPOSE

Elderly chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are one of the fastest growing groups in hemodialysis (HD). However, overall mortality and arteriovenous fistulae failure are still high in this population. Therefore, a different vascular access policy may be advised for this group of patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for relevant articles published in English between the years 2000-2015. Studies investigating vascular access-related outcomes in elderly CKD patients were included.

RESULTS

The scarce literature on this topic suggests that elderly CKD patients are more likely to undergo unnecessary vascular access procedures. However, with appropriate vascular evaluation, arteriovenous access placement is a viable strategy for this group of patients and dialysis access-related outcomes are superior for arteriovenous access in comparison with dialysis catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

When deciding whether or not to create an arteriovenous vascular access in elderly CKD patients, physicians should consider the probability of CKD progression, the expected life expectancy and quality of life of the patient and the probability of success of an arteriovenous access creation.

Multinational Assessment of Accuracy of Equations for Predicting Risk of Kidney Failure: A Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Identifying patients at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression may facilitate more optimal nephrology care. Kidney failure risk equations, including such factors as age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and calcium and phosphate concentrations, were previously developed and validated in 2 Canadian cohorts. Validation in other regions and in CKD populations not under the care of a nephrologist is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of the risk equations across different geographic regions and patient populations through individual participant data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Thirty-one cohorts, including 721,357 participants with CKD stages 3 to 5 in more than 30 countries spanning 4 continents, were studied. These cohorts collected data from 1982 through 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Cohorts participating in the CKD Prognosis Consortium with data on end-stage renal disease.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were obtained and statistical analyses were performed between July 2012 and June 2015. Using the risk factors from the original risk equations, cohort-specific hazard ratios were estimated and combined using random-effects meta-analysis to form new pooled kidney failure risk equations. Original and pooled kidney failure risk equation performance was compared, and the need for regional calibration factors was assessed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Kidney failure (treatment by dialysis or kidney transplant).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4 years of 721,357 participants with CKD, 23,829 cases kidney failure were observed. The original risk equations achieved excellent discrimination (ability to differentiate those who developed kidney failure from those who did not) across all cohorts (overall C statistic, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92 at 2 years; C statistic at 5 years, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90); discrimination in subgroups by age, race, and diabetes status was similar. There was no improvement with the pooled equations. Calibration (the difference between observed and predicted risk) was adequate in North American cohorts, but the original risk equations overestimated risk in some non-North American cohorts. Addition of a calibration factor that lowered the baseline risk by 32.9% at 2 years and 16.5% at 5 years improved the calibration in 12 of 15 and 10 of 13 non-North American cohorts at 2 and 5 years, respectively (P = .04 and P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Kidney failure risk equations developed in a Canadian population showed high discrimination and adequate calibration when validated in 31 multinational cohorts. However, in some regions the addition of a calibration factor may be necessary.

End-Stage Kidney Disease in the Elderly: Approach to Dialysis Initiation, Choosing Modality, and Predicting Outcomes

The number of patients with end-stage kidney disease 65 years and older is growing, and this growth is expected to continue. The presence of medical comorbidities, limited life expectancy, frailty, and poor functional status in these patients poses substantial challenges in clinical decision-making and provision of optimal care. Frailty is more common in elderly patients with CKD than without and is associated with poor outcomes. Several prognostic tools were developed to estimate the rate of CKD progression among elderly, and risk of mortality after dialysis initiation. Risk factors for CKD progression among elderly include low estimated glomerular filtration rate, high baseline proteinuria, acute kidney injury, low serum albumin, and presence of congestive heart failure. The decision to initiate dialysis in the elderly should take into consideration life expectancy, risks and benefits of each dialysis modality, quality of life, and patient and caregiver preferences. This article discusses common issues in the elderly with end-stage kidney disease, with particular emphasis on the impact of frailty and functional status, choice of dialysis modality and vascular access, and prognosis after dialysis initiation, to assist the nephrologist in making decisions regarding optimal care for this complex group of patients.

Outcomes of Elderly Patients after Predialysis Vascular Access Creation

Uniform vascular access guidelines for elderly patients may be inappropriate because of the competing risk of death, high rate of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure, and poor vascular access outcomes in this population. However, the outcomes in elderly patients with advanced CKD who receive permanent vascular access before dialysis initiation are unclear. We identified a large nationally representative cohort of 3418 elderly patients (aged ≥ 70 years) with CKD undergoing predialysis AVF or arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation from 2004 to 2009, and assessed the frequencies of dialysis initiation, death before dialysis initiation, and dialysis-free survival for 2 years after vascular access creation. In all, 67% of patients with predialysis AVF and 71% of patients with predialysis AVG creation initiated dialysis within 2 years of access placement, but the overall risk of dialysis initiation was modified by patient age and race. Only one half of patients initiated dialysis with a functioning AVF or AVG; 46.8% of AVFs were created <90 days before dialysis initiation. Catheter dependence at dialysis initiation was more common in patients receiving predialysis AVF than in patients receiving AVG (46.0% versus 28.5%; P<0.001). In conclusion, most elderly patients with advanced CKD who received predialysis vascular access creation initiated dialysis within 2 years. As a consequence of late predialysis placement or maturation failure, almost one half of patients receiving AVFs initiated dialysis with a catheter. Insertion of an AVG closer to dialysis initiation may serve as a "catheter-sparing" approach and allow delay of permanent access placement in selected elderly patients with CKD.

Embedded Catheters: Minimizing Excessive Embedment Time and Futile Placement while Maintaining Procedure Benefits

BACKGROUND

Embedding peritoneal catheters far in advance of anticipated need may successfully commit patients to their modality choice and reduce central venous catheter use but can be complicated by excessive embedment periods and futile catheter placement.

OBJECTIVE

Embedded catheter outcomes were studied to identify factors that minimize inordinate embedment time and futile placement while maintaining procedure benefits.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were examined in 107 patients with embedded catheters that were either externalized, remained embedded, or were futilely placed.

RESULTS

Externalization of 84 catheters was performed after a median embedment period of 9.4 months. Flow dysfunction occurred in 14.3% of externalized catheters. Overall function rate was 98.8% after laparoscopic revision. One patient changed their mind about modality choice. Except for 1 patient hospitalized acutely in a facility unfamiliar with embedded catheters, none remaining on a peritoneal dialysis pathway initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter. Including catheters with extremely long embedment periods, the incidence of futile placement was 13.1%. Multiple regression analysis identified estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum albumin as the 2 variables best associated with catheter embedment duration (r(2) = 0.44, p < 0.0001). Diabetic nephropathy was statistically more likely to be associated with lower serum albumin values (p < 0.0001); however, no association was noted between diabetic status and embedment duration (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of the embedment procedure should include appraisal of both eGFR and serum albumin. Appropriate consideration of these values together may help minimize excessive embedment periods and decrease futile placements while preserving procedure benefits.