Rituximab in CD20 positive multiple myeloma

Precision medicine for multiple myeloma: The case for translocation (11;14)

The t(11;14) translocation is among the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM), distinguished by its unique features and biology that have been thoroughly explored for decades. What further sets this MM subtype apart is its oscillating prognostic significance, from initially being considered a favorable alteration to intermediate risk and potential future reclassification as favorable risk. Despite not being inherently a high-risk alteration indicative of an aggressive phenotype, it appears that t(11;14)-MM is less responsive to novel agents like proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs which have otherwise transformed the disease's treatment landscape, perhaps partially explained by its reduced propensity for immunoglobulin production and oligosecretory nature. However, its distinct reliance on Bcl-2 has heightened its sensitivity to venetoclax. Further subclassification based on morphological and genomic characteristics could enhance our prediction models of treatment responses and enable more tailored therapeutic strategies for patients. This review aims to encapsulate the existing research evidence in this area.

Flow cytometric myeloma measurable residual disease testing in the era of targeted therapies

Therapies in myeloma are rapidly advancing with a host of new targeted therapies coming to market. While these drugs offer significant survival benefits and better side-effect profiles compared with conventional chemotherapeutics, they raise significant difficulties in monitoring post-therapy disease status by flow cytometry due to assay interference and/or selection of phenotypically different sub-clones. The principal culprit, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, limits the ability to detect plasma cells based on classical CD38/CD45 gating. Other markers, such as CD138, are known to be suboptimal by flow cytometry. Various techniques have been proposed to overcome this problem. The most promising of these techniques has been the marker VS38c, a monoclonal antibody targeting an endoplasmic reticulum protein which has shown high sensitivity for plasma cells. Alternative techniques for gating plasma cells, while variably effective in the near term are already the subject of several targeted therapies rendering their usefulness limited in the longer term. Likewise, future targets of these therapies may render present aberrancy markers ineffective in MRD testing. These therapies pose challenges that must be overcome with new markers and novel panels in order for flow cytometric MRD testing to remain relevant.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis

In systemic light-chain amyloidosis, monoclonal antibodies target antigens that are either membrane-bound or circulating or deposited in the organs. CD38 holds high promise as a target against clonal plasma cells. Multiple anti-CD38 antibodies are either approved for use or being investigated in clinical trials. Daratumumab has been investigated and has clinical efficacy in upfront or refractory settings. High rates of hematologic response are seen with daratumumab, which translates to high organ response rates. Rituximab is usually integrated into the treatment regimen for IgM amyloidosis. Anti-amyloid therapies have shown preclinical proof of principle, but lack confirmation of improvement.

Diagnostic and treatment hurdles in plasma cell myeloma with t(11;14) translocation: A case report

t(11;14) translocation is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities in plasma cell myeloma. The present case report presented a case of plasma cell myeloma with t(11;14) translocation, in which the plasma cells were small lymphoplasmacytoids in morphology with positive cluster of differentiation-20 and Cyclin D1 expression. These results led to initial diagnostic difficulties. The patient was refractory to bortezomib-based therapy, and responsive to vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone. However, the prognostic value of t(11;14) in plasma cell myeloma remains to be determined. With recent advances in treatment options, physicians should be aware of the clinical and pathological characteristics of this translocation in plasma cell myeloma.

Plasma Cell Dyscrasias in India-2017 Updates

Rapid advances are being made in the field of plasma cell dyscrasias. Many abstracts pertaining to the laboratory aspects, clinical features, treatment modalities and outcome of plasma cell dyscrasias were presented at Hematocon 2017. All the total of 24 abstracts pertaining to plasma cell dyscrasias presented at the Hematocon 2017 were reviewed. Out of them 10 were original research and 14 were case reports/short case series. The key findings of original research studies conducted in India are being summarized. Exciting research in the field of plasma cell dyscrasias is being carried out by various centers in the country. Data presented on various aspects of research in plasma cell disorders is encouraging. Multicentric research in the field plasma cell dyscrasias should be encouraged to highlight the various aspects of disease biology and challenges in management unique to our country.

Role of the Immune Response in Disease Progression and Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic cancer derived from malignant plasma cells within the bone marrow. Unlike most solid tumors, which originate from epithelial cells, the myeloma tumor is a plasma cell derived from the lymphoid cell lineage originating from a post-germinal B-cell. As such, the MM plasma cell represents an integral component of the immune system in terms of both antibody production and antigen presentation, albeit not efficiently. This fundamental difference has significant implications when one considers the implications of immunotherapy. In the case of lymphoid malignancies such as myeloma, immune-based strategies must take into consideration this important difference, potentially necessitating immunotherapy targeted toward MM to be altered from that targeted at solid tumors. Typically, the immune system "surveys" cells within our body and is able to recognize and attack cancerous cells that may arise. However, some cancer cells are able to evade immune surveillance and continue to flourish, causing disease. The major mechanism leading to an effective tumor-specific response is one that enables effective antigen processing and presentation with subsequent T-cell activation, expansion, and effective trafficking to the tumor site. Plasma cells employ several mechanisms to escape immune surveillance which include altered interactions with T-cells, DCs, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC's), and natural killer cells (NK Cells) that can be mediated by immunosuppressive cells such as and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC's) and cytokines such as IL-10, TGFβ, and IL-6 as well as down-regulation of the antigen processing machinery. Many therapies have been developed to reestablish a functional immune system in MM patients. These include adoptive T-cell therapies to deliver more tumor-specific T-cells, vaccines to increase the tumor-specific precursor frequency of the endogenous T-cell population, immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) such as thalidomide and lenalidomide to enhance global endogenous immunity, immunostimulatory cytokines, and antibodies to specifically target tumor-specific cell-surface proteins or cytokines. This review will dissect these various approaches currently being explored in MM as well as highlight some future directions for myeloma-specific immune-based strategies.

Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma

The therapeutic landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved spectacularly over the past decade with the discovery and validation of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents as highly active agents, both in front-line therapy as well as in the relapse and maintenance settings. Although previous attempts to apply available monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) to the treatment of patients with MM has until recently been disappointing, novel targets specifically explored in the context of MM have recently lead to the first approvals of Mabs for the treatment of patients with MM. We have performed a literature search to identify preclinical targeting of MM, including in vitro and in vivo models using monoclonal antibodies, as well as clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies in patients with MM. Sources used were peer-reviewed publications, congress abstracts and on-line clinical trials data (such as clinicaltrials.gov). Several targets have been evaluated in preclinical models and a growing number of agents are being evaluated in clinical trials, as single agents or in combination and under various antibody formats. Two agents, targeting for the first time CD38 and SLAMF7, respectively, have recently been approved for the treatment of patients with MM. The recent approval of these two antibodies is expected to have a strong impact on treatment modalities and outcome in patients with MM, including both transplant eligible and elderly patients.

Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma: where do we stand and where are we going?

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that is characterized by refractory and relapsing course of disease. Despite the introduction of high-dose chemotherapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation and innovative agents such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, achieving cure in multiple myeloma is a challenging endeavor. In the last couple of years, enormous advances were made in implementing monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma. A large number of preclinical and clinical studies have been introduced successfully, demonstrating a safe and efficient administration of monoclonal antibodies in multiple myeloma. In particular, the application of monoclonal antibodies in combination with immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, corticosteroids or conventional chemotherapy seem to be promising and will expand the treatment arsenal for patients with multiple myeloma.

CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Myeloma

The goal of this review is to provide historical, recent preclinical, and current clinical summaries of efforts to understand the CD38 molecule and to develop monoclonal antibodies that target it. We focus particularly on efforts involving multiple myeloma, a malignancy of terminally differentiated B cells that remains incurable despite many advances. An era of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody therapy for myeloma is approaching, one that, we hope, will enable patients to live longer and better lives.

[The characteristics of 62 cases of CD20-positive multiple myeloma]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical and laboratory characteristics of mutiple myeloma patients with CD20 expression.

METHODS

Review the data of mutiple myeloma patients and analyze the clinical and laboratory characteristics of CD20 positive patients, compared with CD20 negative patients.

RESULTS

(1)Totally 465 cases of newly-diagnosed MM were collected with CD20 expression status detected by multi-color flow cytometry. Sixty two patients (13.3%) were CD20 positive and the others were negative. (2)No statistical differences were found between CD20 positive and negative groups about the sex ratio, age predominance, D-S staging, ISS staging, renal insufficiency rate, platelet count, LDH level and classifications by paraprotein(all P value>0.05). (3)Compared with those of CD20 negative patients, the hemoglobulin value(74.5 g/L vs 83.5 g/L, P=0.021), extramedullary involvement rate (3.5% vs 13.7%, P=0.029), CD56-positive rate(36.7% vs 68.8%,P=0.000), t(4;14)translocation rate(2.4% vs 24.0%, P=0.001) in CD20 positive patients were lower statistically. (4)Compared with those of CD20 negative patients, the percentage of plasma cells (0.400 vs 0.295, P=0.045) by marrow smear differential counting, the percentage of myeloma cells(20.0% vs 6.8%, P=0.000) by multi-color flow cytometry analysis, CD45-positive rate(12.1% vs 4.5%, P=0.018), CD79a-positive rate(9.8% vs 1.5%, P=0.013) and t(11;14) translocation rate(60.5% vs 14.4%, P=0.000)in CD20 positive patients were higher statistically. (5)There was no statistical differences about the overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), TTP(time to progression), PFS(progression free survival) and overall survival (OS) between CD20 positive and negative groups.

CONCLUSION

CD20 positive rate is 13.3% in multiple myeloma pateints according to our data. CD20 poaitive myeloma were prone to residing in bone marrow and affecting erythropoiesis. Atypical immunophenotypes were more common, and the incidence of t(11;14) were increased markedly while that of t(4;14)were rare for CD20 positive multiple myeloma.

Potential role of daratumumab in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the US. Treatments utilizing alkylating agents, corticosteroids, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs have resulted in significant survival benefits, however, despite the advances, relapse is inevitable. Decreased depth and duration of response obtained with each successive relapse of disease is typical of the disease course, thereby highlighting a continuing need for new treatment options. With the introduction of monoclonal antibodies for multiple myeloma, new options for treatment in the relapsed setting are on the horizon. Among the new immunologic agents is daratumumab (DARA), a humanized antibody to CD38 with potent multifaceted antitumor activity. Phase I and II clinical trials have demonstrated significant reduction in serum M-protein and bone marrow plasma cell percentage in refractory patients, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Moreover, ex vivo studies have shown that DARA may be particularly useful in combination with currently used anti-myeloma agents. With a recent breakthrough drug designation by the US Food and Drug Administration, DARA shows promise as mono- and combination therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Profile of elotuzumab and its potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Although the introduction of novel drugs has improved outcome significantly in multiple myeloma (MM), many patients still eventually relapse. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting MM-related antigens can complement currently available therapies. CS1 (also known as CD2 subunit 1, SLAMF7, CD319, and CRACC), a cell surface glycoprotein receptor that is a member of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family, is highly and nearly uniformly expressed in myeloma cells at the gene and protein level, but not expressed in other tissues, including hematopoietic stem cells, making CS1 a compelling target for the design of immunotherapies directed at MM. Elotuzumab (formerly HuLuc63), which is a humanized IgG1 mAb recognizing the extracellular region of human CS1, has been shown to be effective in preclinical and early stage clinical investigations, and its efficacy and safety will be further validated in ongoing Phase III trials. Integration of elotuzumab into multidrug therapeutic paradigms seems logical, as elotuzumab is more effective when combined with other agents, such as immunomodulatory drugs or proteasome inhibitors. The functional role of CS1 in MM pathogenesis and the consequences of elotuzumab on normal immune cells should be further investigated. Identification of potential biomarkers and exploration of resistance mechanisms are important issues for elotuzumab-based therapies, as is determining the best clinical placement of elotuzumab, not only in the relapsed/refractory setting but also in upfront therapy for high-risk frank MM, smoldering MM at high-risk of progression, and in maintenance regimens. This review will cover the biological characteristics of CS1 in normal immune cells and MM cells, the efficacy profile and mechanisms of action of elotuzumab from preclinical and clinical investigations, and its potential impact on the treatment of MM.

Immunophenotype of normal and myelomatous plasma-cell subsets

Plasma cells (PCs) are essentially characterized by the co-expression of CD138 and CD38, which allows their identification in flow cytometry in bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood, or cell suspensions from tissues. These terminally differentiated B-cells may lose the expression of surface CD19 and that of CD20 while retaining CD27. When malignant, they can gain a number of other markers such as CD28, CD33, CD56, or CD117 and lose CD27. Moreover, since each PC is only able to produce a single type of immunoglobulins (Igs), they display isotypic restriction and clonal malignant PCs can be further characterized by their homogeneous expression of either kappa or lambda light chains. In multiple myeloma (MM), such PC clones produce the Ig identified in plasma as an abnormal peak. In the BM where they essentially accumulate, these PCs may however display various immunophenotypes. The latter were explored in a two-way approach. Firstly, the various subsets delineated by the selective or common expression of CD19 together with combined CD56/CD28 were explored in normal and MM BM. Then, other aberrant markers’ expression was investigated, i.e., CD20, CD27, CD33, CD56, CD117. These data were compared to literature information. They underline the vast heterogeneity of MM PCs possibly accounting for the various answers to therapy of MM patients.

Targeting and depletion of circulating leukocytes and cancer cells by lipophilic antibody-modified erythrocytes

There is a great interest in targeting and selective ablation of populations of circulating cells for research or therapeutic purposes. Red blood cells (RBCs) are readily available and fully biocompatible long-circulating intravascular carriers (natural life is 120days) that are amenable to chemical modifications, drug loading and reinjection. Here we demonstrate that using our previously described lipophilic ligand painting strategy, red blood cells (RBCs) could be in one step converted into targeted entities that selectively seek and bind various cells in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, RBCs modified with lipophilic anti-EpCAM or anti-CD45 antibodies efficiently bound to cancer cells and leukocytes, forming characteristic rosettes. In vivo, intravenously injected RBCs painted with anti-CD45 antibody immediately associated with CD45 positive cells in blood, forming RBC-leukocyte rosettes. Moreover, anti-CD45-modified RBCs, but not the same amount of anti-CD45 antibody or anti-CD45-lipid conjugate (1-2μg/mouse), depleted over 50% of CD45+ leukocytes from circulation, with main clearance organs of leukocytes being liver and spleen with no visible deposition in kidneys and lungs. Anti-CD20 (Rituximab)-painted RBCs efficiently (over 90%) depleted CD19+/CD20+/CD45+ human lymphoma cells in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) JeKo-1 model, while the same amount of rituximab-lipid (2μg/mouse) was much less efficient in lymphoma cell depletion. Treatment of MCL mice with rituximab-modified RBCs carrying only 2μg of the antibody resulted in a significant prolongation of survival as compared to the same amount of antibody-lipid control. Lipophilic ligand-painted RBCs is a novel tool that can be utilized for targeting blood borne cells for experimental immunology and drug delivery applications.

Future agents and treatment directions in multiple myeloma

The development of bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents resulted in a revolution in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Moreover, second-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib) and immunomodulatory agents (pomalidomide) have recently been approved. Nevertheless, the incurability of this disease requires other drugs with different mechanisms of action to either prolong the survival of patients refractory to current therapies, or achieve cure. Active research has been done exploring the pathogenesis of MM and searching for novel, druggable targets. In this regard, some of these novel agents seem promising, such as monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD38 - daratumumab or anti-CS1 - elotuzumab) or the kinesin protein inhibitor Arry-520. Other agents under investigation are kinase inhibitors, signaling pathways inhibitors or deacetylase inhibitors. With so many novel agents under investigation, future therapy in MM will probably involve the combined use of the already approved drugs with some of those newly discovered.

Activity of 129 single-agent drugs in 228 phase I and II clinical trials in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

More than 400 preclinical studies report ≥ 1 compound as cytotoxic to multiple myeloma (MM) cells; however, few of these agents became relevant in the clinic. Thus, the utility of such assays in predicting future clinical value is debatable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the application of early-phase trial experiences to predict future clinical adoption. We identified 129 drugs explored as single agents in 228 trials involving 7421 patients between 1961 and 2013.

RESULTS

All drugs in common use in MM (melphalan, dexamethasone, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and doxorubicin) demonstrated a best reported response rate of ≥ 22%. Older agents, including teniposide, fotemustine, paclitaxel, and interferon, also appear active by this criterion; however, if mean response rates from all reported trials for an agent are considered, then only drugs with a mean response rate of 15% partial response are in clinical use.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that thresholds of 20% for best or 15% for mean response are highly predictive of future clinical success. Below these thresholds, no drug has yet reached regulatory approval or widespread use in the clinic. Thus, this benchmark provides 1 element of the framework for guiding choice of drugs for late-stage clinical testing.

Myeloma stem cell concepts, heterogeneity and plasticity of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells (PCs) in the bone marrow (BM). Although novel therapeutic strategies have prolonged survival of patients, the disease remains difficult to treat with a high risk of relapse. The failure of therapy is thought to be associated with a persistent population of the so-called MM stem cells or myeloma initiating cells (MIC) that exhibit tumour-initiating potential, self-renewal and resistance to chemotherapy. However, the population responsible for the origin and sustainability of tumour mass has not been clearly characterized so far. This review summarizes current myeloma stem cell concepts and suggests that high phenotypic and intra-clonal heterogeneity, together with plasticity potential of MM might be other contributing factors explaining discrepancies among particular concepts and contributing to the treatment failure.

Immunotherapy strategies for multiple myeloma: the present and the future

Growing knowledge of the complexities of the immune system have led to a better understanding of how it can be harnessed for the purpose of anticancer therapy. Moreover, recent success with immunotherapies for solid tumors, combined with novel therapeutic strategies against myeloma, heighten excitement at the prospect of improving clinical outcomes for myeloma by improving antitumor immunity. Increased understanding of myeloma tumor-associated antigens, availability of more potent vaccines, expanded immune-modulating therapies, development of agents that block immune-suppressive pathways, increased sophistication of adoptive cell therapy techniques and capitalization upon standard autologous transplant are all important standalone or combination strategies that might ultimately improve prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma.

Is CD20 positive plasma cell myeloma a unique clinicopathological entity? A study of 40 cases and review of the literature

AIMS

A number of clinicopathological features have been attributed to the CD20 positive subset of plasma cell myeloma (PCM). CD20 is an appealing therapeutic target given the success with monoclonal antibody regimens in a spectrum of B cell lymphomas. To date, a small number of reports have described CD20 PCM as a unique subset, and these are not conclusive, especially taking into consideration reporting bias. This study aims to further identify the clinicopathological features of CD20 PCM.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all newly diagnosed PCM between 2003 and 2010 was undertaken. Trephine material was retrieved and reviewed for CD20, and for positive cases an extended immunohistochemical (IHC) panel including cyclin D1 was subsequently performed.

RESULTS

The review of our 40 cases and those described in the literature demonstrated that these are heterogeneous with regard to clinical features, morphology, biochemical features, immunophenotype, and cytogenetics.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study and review of the literature, CD20 PCM cases represent a heterogeneous disease and not a unique clinicopathological entity.

The role of CD19 and CD27 in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: a new statistical model

We have developed a new statistical diagnostic model that examines the correlation between immunophenotype and clonality as detected by flow cytometry (FC) and histology, defining the diagnostic role of FC in multiple myeloma (MM). The 192 bone marrow samples from patients and control subjects were studied for routine diagnostic analysis of MM; a minimum of 100 plasma cells (PCs) were analyzed for each patient sample. A direct 7- or 8-color method was applied to study the immunophenotype of PCs, utilizing a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Samples were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (AmCyan, Pac Blue, fluorescein isothiocyanate, phycoerythrin [PE], PECy7, peridinin-chlorophyll protein, allophycocyanin [APC], and APC-Cy7) to the following antigens: CD138, CD81, CD200, CD221, CD45, CD38, CD28, CD19, CD27, CD117, CD38, CD33, CD20, CD56, CD10, and immunoglobulin κ and λ light chains. Among all antigens tested, CD19 and CD27, when applied to our model, resulted in optimal concordance with histology. This model defines the effective diagnostic role FC could have in MM and in the detection of minimal residual disease.

Update on the Diagnosis and Classification of the Plasma Cell Neoplasms

The plasma cell neoplasms are malignancies of the most terminally differentiated cells in B-cell ontogeny and are usually associated with the production of a monoclonal immunoglobulin molecule or M protein. These malignancies include tumors whose clinical manifestations are directly attributable to the end-organ damage induced by the dysregulated proliferation of neoplastic plasma cells. In contrast, disorders, such as primary amyloidosis, have a paradoxically low burden of neoplastic plasma cells, rendered highly pathogenic by the end-organ damage induced by deposition of the secreted paraprotein. In this article, discussion focuses on plasma cell myeloma. The molecular pathogenesis of plasma cell myeloma is reviewed and the diagnosis of the plasma cell neoplasms discussed.

Multiparameter immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: The diagnostic utility of defining ranges of normal antigenic expression in comparison to histology

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported on the immunophenotype of plasma cells (PCs) in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and in plasma cell myeloma (PCM), but very few have examined the immunophenotype of normal PCs. In this study, an objective definition of normal range of expression for each antigen was found on normal control PCs. Using these new ranges of normal expression (new method) is different from using a static 20% of PCs cut-off for all antigens as described in the literature (traditional method). These newly calculated normal ranges for each antigen were applied to our data, and compared to histologic and immunohistochemical findings.

METHODS

Bone marrow samples from 46 patients with PC neoplasms and 15 normal controls were studied. A minimum of 100 PC were analyzed for each patient and control sample. An 8-color staining method was applied to study the immunophenotype of PCs, using a BD FACSCanto II.

RESULTS

By the new ranges of normality calculated in this study it was determined that different antigens have different level of expression on polyclonal PCs. CD19 correlated with histology by both the traditional and new methods, but had superior correlation by the new method.

CONCLUSIONS

This report is the first 8-color immunophenotypic study of PCM in which a "range of normal expression" for each antigen is defined. This is a critical step to help distinguish between a normal and neoplastic PC immunophenotype and discern which antigens are of diagnostic importance.

Bortezomib successfully reverses early recurrence of light-chain deposition disease in a renal allograft: a case report

Light-Chain Deposition Disease (LCDD) frequently recurs after renal transplantation, displaying a pernicious course. Herein we have described a 39-year-old Caucasian man with a history of immunoglobulin G-kappa multiple myeloma who failed two chemotherapy regimens, but ultimately responded to the combination of thalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation 3 years prior to transplantation, during which time he showed no evidence of persistent or recurrent disease. At 3 days following spousal living related renal transplantation, he displayed a rapid deterioration of renal function requiring dialysis therapy. This episode failed to respond to empiric antirejection therapy including anti-thymocyte globulin, plasmapheresis, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Increasing evidence suggested recurrence of LCDD, including positive immunofluorescence staining of basement membranes and vessels for kappa light chains as well as free kappa light chains in his urine and serum. Following suspension of sirolimus, he was initiated on and responded to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)) with discontinuation of dialysis within 3 weeks and progressively improving renal function. His maintenance therapy, in addition to six 2-week-long cycles of bortezomib separated by 1-week rest periods, includes cyclosporine (50 mg twice daily), prednisone (10 mg daily), and curcumin (9 g daily). In sum, bortezomib rescue therapy salvaged a spousal renal transplant afflicted with recurrent LCDD.

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping and minimal residual disease analysis in multiple myeloma

Presence of normal plasma cells (PCs), hemodilution of bone marrow aspirate, and changes in the immunophenotype are important considerations in minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated 124 subjects-107 with MM, 11 with Hodgkin lymphoma, and 6 allogeneic stem cell transplantation donors-for the immunophenotype of neoplastic, reactive, and normal PCs respectively. Of the patients with MM, 36 were evaluated for MRD and 23 for a change in immunophenotype after chemotherapy. The immunophenotype of normal and reactive PCs was similar and differed from that of neoplastic PCs with respect to CD19, CD45, CD56, CD52, CD20, and CD117. At least 2 antigens were aberrantly expressed in all cases and 3 in 90.7% of MM cases. A change in the immunoprofile of PCs was observed in 18 (78%) of 23 cases. By using flow cytometry, we detected MRD in all samples, and a neoplastic PC index (percentage of neoplastic PCs/total bone marrow PCs) of less than 30 could differentiate immunofixation (IFx)- from IFx+ samples (complete and partial responders, respectively).

Combinatorial efficacy of anti-CS1 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab (HuLuc63) and bortezomib against multiple myeloma

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy for multiple myeloma, a malignancy of plasma cells, has not been clinically efficacious in part due to a lack of appropriate targets. We recently reported that the cell surface glycoprotein CS1 (CD2 subset 1, CRACC, SLAMF7, CD319) was highly and universally expressed on myeloma cells while having restricted expression in normal tissues. Elotuzumab (formerly known as HuLuc63), a humanized mAb targeting CS1, is currently in a phase I clinical trial in relapsed/refractory myeloma. In this report we investigated whether the activity of elotuzumab could be enhanced by bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor with significant activity in myeloma. We first showed that elotuzumab could induce patient-derived myeloma cell killing within the bone marrow microenvironment using a SCID-hu mouse model. We next showed that CS1 gene and cell surface protein expression persisted on myeloma patient-derived plasma cells collected after bortezomib administration. In vitro bortezomib pretreatment of myeloma targets significantly enhanced elotuzumab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, both for OPM2 myeloma cells using natural killer or peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors and for primary myeloma cells using autologous natural killer effector cells. In an OPM2 myeloma xenograft model, elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib exhibited significantly enhanced in vivo antitumor activity. These findings provide the rationale for a clinical trial combining elotuzumab and bortezomib, which will test the hypothesis that combining both drugs would result in enhanced immune lysis of myeloma by elotuzumab and direct targeting of myeloma by bortezomib.

Milatuzumab: a promising new agent for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies

BACKGROUND

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma are often incurable and respond to a limited set of treatment options. The selective expression of CD74, the invariant chain of the MHC class II molecule, in these malignancies provides an attractive target for antibody-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the preclinical data for milatuzumab, a humanized antibody targeting CD74, as a treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and multiple myeloma.

METHODS

A review of the literature was carried out using PubMed. Current Phase I protocols using milatuzumab are summarized.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Milatuzumab is cytotoxic to lymphoma and multiple myeloma cell lines and mouse-human xenografts. The efficacy dramatically increases when milatuzumab is attached to a toxin or a radioactive agent. Phase I trials of milatuzumab are now underway in human subjects with lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

Rituximab in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Besides traditional cytostatic drugs the introduction of monoclonal antibodies has substantially influenced current treatment concepts of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 chimeric antibody, now has been widely evaluated in the various B-cell lymphatic neoplasms. Large phase III studies helped to prove the value of this drug in follicular lymphoma as part of induction or relapse treatment as well as maintenance treatment. The addition of rituximab to the well established CHOP regimens has increased achievable cure rates in diffuse large cell lymphoma, and this combination is now accepted worldwide as standard of care. Although conflicting results are available, rituximab is widely used for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. For the less frequent lymphoma entities phase 2 studies show a considerable efficiency for most of these B-NHL variants. Current research focuses on combined chemoimmunotherapy approaches, optimization of dosing regimens, and combination with novel agents.

Combination of rituximab and oral melphalan and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Clonotypic B lymphocytes may underlie relapse of patients with multiple myeloma. Rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, may result in eradication of the monoclonal B cells. We conducted a phase II study of rituximab in combination with melphalan and prednisone therapy (MP) followed by rituximab maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Sixteen patients (35%) had CD20 positive bone marrow plasma cells, while 9 patients (20%) had unknown CD20 status. No patient had a complete remission, 26 patients (58%) had a partial response, 6 patients (13%) had a minimal response, and 8 patients (18%) had stable disease. The median event-free survival was 14 months, and the 7-year overall survival was 30%. The toxicity of the combination was overall manageable and consistent with what is generally noted with MP chemotherapy. The combination of rituximab to MP therapy did not result in improved response rate or event-free survival.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma

CD20 is a particularly appealing target that is expressed on the surface of almost all B cells, with no significant shedding, secretion or internalization. In contrast to the demonstrated efficacy of anti-CD20 strategies in various B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, the role of such therapy in multiple myeloma is undetermined and controversial. The expression of CD20 by myeloma cells is heterogeneous, and can be detected only in 13-22% of patients. However, there is increasing interest in testing anti-CD20 therapy in myeloma because of recent studies suggesting the existence of clonogenic CD20-positive precursor B cells in the disease. This article reviews the rationale, preclinical and clinical activity of anti-CD20 therapy in myeloma. Clinical trials show that anti-CD20 therapy with rituximab elicits a partial response in approximately 10% of CD20+ patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, there is preliminary evidence of disease stabilization in 50-57% of CD20+ patients for a period of 10-27 months. Further large-scale clinical trials are therefore needed to establish the role of this promising strategy in the treatment of myeloma.

From the bench to the bedside: emerging new treatments in multiple myeloma

Within the last decade, several novel classes of anti-myeloma therapeutics have become available. The clinical successes achieved by thalidomide, lenalidomide, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, and in particular the ability of these agents to lead to major clinical responses in patients resistant to conventional or high-dose chemotherapy, have highlighted the importance of expanding further the spectrum of classes of agents utilized for the treatment of myeloma. Herein, we review the current status for the development of novel anti-myeloma agents, with emphasis on classes of therapeutics which have already translated into clinical trials or those in advanced stages of preclinical development. These include second-generation proteasome inhibitors (NPI-0052 and PR-171), heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) inhibitors, 2-methoxyestradiol, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (e.g. SAHA and LBH589), fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGF-R3) inhibitors, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and agents specifically targeting the tumor microenvironment, such as defibrotide.

Mini-Midi-Maxi? How to harness the graft-versus-myeloma effect and target molecular remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after standard myeloablative conditioning induces a high rate of complete remissions, but long-term freedom from disease is achieved in 30-40% of the cases only. The therapeutic effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is due to cytotoxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma effect by donor T cells. Retrospective studies clearly suggest that both (a) reducing the intensity of high-dose chemotherapy by using reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen or (b) reducing the immunotherapy of donor T cells by using T-cell depletion result in lower treatment-related morbidity and mortality, but also in higher rate of relapse. Therefore, this review will focus on potential strategies of how treatment-related morbidity and mortality might be kept low without an increased risk of relapse and how remission status after transplantation can be enhanced by using the newly established donor immunosystems after allografting as a platform for post-transplant treatment strategies with new drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) or immunotherapy (donor lymphocyte infusion, vaccination, tumor-specific T cells) in order to achieve remission on a molecular level, which seems to be a 'conditio sine qua non' to cure myeloma patients.