Binding of select forms of pRB to protein phosphatase type 1 independent of catalytic activity

Understanding Retinoblastoma Post-Translational Regulation for the Design of Targeted Cancer Therapies

Simple Summary

Rb1 is a regulator of cell cycle progression and genomic stability. This review focuses on post-translational modifications, their effect on Rb1 interactors, and their role in intracellular signaling in the context of cancer development. Finally, we highlight potential approaches to harness these post-translational modifications to design novel effective anticancer therapies.

Abstract

The retinoblastoma protein (Rb1) is a prototypical tumor suppressor protein whose role was described more than 40 years ago. Together with p107 (also known as RBL1) and p130 (also known as RBL2), the Rb1 belongs to a family of structurally and functionally similar proteins that inhibits cell cycle progression. Given the central role of Rb1 in regulating proliferation, its expression or function is altered in most types of cancer. One of the mechanisms underlying Rb-mediated cell cycle inhibition is the binding and repression of E2F transcription factors, and these processes are dependent on Rb1 phosphorylation status. However, recent work shows that Rb1 is a convergent point of many pathways and thus the regulation of its function through post-translational modifications is more complex than initially expected. Moreover, depending on the context, downstream signaling can be both E2F-dependent and -independent. This review seeks to summarize the most recent research on Rb1 function and regulation and discuss potential avenues for the design of novel cancer therapies.

SPINOPHILIN: a multiplayer tumor suppressor

SPINOPHILIN (SPN, PPP1R9B or NEURABIN-2) is a multifunctional protein that regulates protein-protein interactions in different cell signaling pathways. SPN is also one of the regulatory subunits of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), implicated in the dephosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) during cell cycle. The SPN gene has been described as a tumor suppressor in different human tumor contexts, in which low levels of SPN are correlated with a higher grade and worse prognosis. In addition, mutations of the SPN protein have been reported in human tumors. Recently, an oncogenic mutation of SPN, A566V, was described, which affects both the SPN-PP1 interaction and the phosphatase activity of the holoenzyme, and promotes p53-dependent tumorigenesis by increasing the cancer stem cell (CSC) pool in breast tumors. Thus, the loss or mutation of SPN could be late events that promotes tumor progression by increasing the CSC pool and, eventually, the malignant behavior of the tumor.

Role of the Holoenzyme PP1-SPN in the Dephosphorylation of the RB Family of Tumor Suppressors During Cell Cycle

Simple Summary

Cell cycle progression is highly regulated by modulating the phosphorylation status of retinoblastoma (RB) family proteins. This process is controlled by a balance in the action of kinases, such as the complexes formed by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins, and phosphatases, mainly the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). However, while the phosphorylation of the RB family has been largely studied, its dephosphorylation is less known. Recently, the PP1-Spinophilin (SPN) holoenzyme has been described as the main phosphatase responsible for the dephosphorylation of RB proteins during the G0/G1 transition and at the end of G1. Here, we describe the regulation of the phosphorylation status of RB family proteins, giving importance not only to their inactivation by phosphorylation but also to their dephosphorylation to restore the cell cycle.

Abstract

Cell cycle progression is highly regulated by modulating the phosphorylation status of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and the other two members of the RB family, p107 and p130. This process is controlled by a balance in the action of kinases, such as the complexes formed by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins, and phosphatases, mainly the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). However, while the phosphorylation of the RB family has been largely studied, its dephosphorylation is less known. Phosphatases are holoenzymes formed by a catalytic subunit and a regulatory protein with substrate specificity. Recently, the PP1-Spinophilin (SPN) holoenzyme has been described as the main phosphatase responsible for the dephosphorylation of RB proteins during the G0/G1 transition and at the end of G1. Moreover, SPN has been described as a tumor suppressor dependent on PP1 in lung and breast tumors, where it promotes tumorigenesis by increasing the cancer stem cell pool. Therefore, a connection between the cell cycle and stem cell biology has also been proposed via SPN/PP1/RB proteins.

Mutation of SPINOPHILIN (PPP1R9B) found in human tumors promotes the tumorigenic and stemness properties of cells

Rationale: SPINOPHILIN (SPN, PPP1R9B) is an important tumor suppressor involved in the progression and malignancy of different tumors depending on its association with protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and the ability of the PP1-SPN holoenzyme to dephosphorylate retinoblastoma (pRB).

Methods: We performed a mutational analysis of SPN in human tumors, focusing on the region of interaction with PP1 and pRB. We explored the effect of the SPN-A566V mutation in an immortalized non-tumorigenic cell line of epithelial breast tissue, MCF10A, and in two different p53-mutated breast cancer cells lines, T47D and MDA-MB-468.

Results: We characterized an oncogenic mutation of SPN found in human tumor samples, SPN-A566V, that affects both the SPN-PP1 interaction and its phosphatase activity. The SPN-A566V mutation does not affect the interaction of the PP1-SPN holoenzyme with pocket proteins pRB, p107 and p130, but it affects its ability to dephosphorylate them during G0/G1 and G1, indicating that the PP1-SPN holoenzyme regulates cell cycle progression. SPN-A566V also promoted stemness, establishing a connection between the cell cycle and stem cell biology via pocket proteins and PP1-SPN regulation. However, only cells with both SPN-A566V and mutant p53 have increased tumorigenic and stemness properties.

Conclusions: SPN-A566V, or other equivalent mutations, could be late events that promote tumor progression by increasing the CSC pool and, eventually, the malignant behavior of the tumor.

Ras Regulates Rb via NORE1A

Mutations in the Ras oncogene are one of the most frequent events in human cancer. Although Ras regulates numerous growth-promoting pathways to drive transformation, it can paradoxically promote an irreversible cell cycle arrest known as oncogene-induced senescence. Although senescence has clearly been implicated as a major defense mechanism against tumorigenesis, the mechanisms by which Ras can promote such a senescent phenotype remain poorly defined. We have shown recently that the Ras death effector NORE1A plays a critical role in promoting Ras-induced senescence and connects Ras to the regulation of the p53 tumor suppressor. We now show that NORE1A also connects Ras to the regulation of a second major prosenescent tumor suppressor, the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. We show that Ras induces the formation of a complex between NORE1A and the phosphatase PP1A, promoting the activation of the Rb tumor suppressor by dephosphorylation. Furthermore, suppression of Rb reduces NORE1A senescence activity. These results, together with our previous findings, suggest that NORE1A acts as a critical tumor suppressor node, linking Ras to both the p53 and the Rb pathways to drive senescence.

Inhibition of protein phosphatase-1 and -2A decreases the chemosensitivity of leukemic cells to chemotherapeutic drugs

The phosphorylation of key proteins balanced by protein kinases and phosphatases are implicated in the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis of malignant cells and influences anticancer drug actions. The efficacy of daunorubicin (DNR) in suppression of leukemic cell survival was investigated in the presence of tautomycin (TM) and calyculin A (CLA), specific membrane permeable inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) and -2A (PP2A), respectively. CLA (50 nM) or TM (1μM) suppressed viability of THP-1 and KG-1 myeloid leukemia cell lines to moderate extents; however, they significantly increased survival upon DNR-induced cell death. CLA increased the phosphorylation level of Erk1/2 and PKB/Akt kinases, the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), decreased caspase-3 activation by DNR and increased the phosphorylation level of the inhibitory sites (Thr696 and Thr853) in the myosin phosphatase (MP) target subunit (MYPT1) as well as in a 25kDa kinase-enhanced phosphatase inhibitor (KEPI)-like protein. TM induced enhanced phosphorylation of pRb only, suggesting that this event may be a common factor upon CLA-induced PP2A and TM-induced PP1 inhibitory influences on cell survival. Silencing PP1 by siRNA in HeLa cells, or overexpression of Flag-KEPI in MCF-7 cells coupled with inducing its phosphorylation by PMA or CLA, resulted in increased phosphorylation of pRb. Our results indicate that PP1 directly dephosphorylates pRb, while PP2A might have an indirect influence via mediating the phosphorylation level of PP1 inhibitory proteins. These data imply the importance of PP1 inhibitory proteins in controlling the phosphorylation state of key proteins and regulating drug sensitivity and apoptosis in leukemic cells.

PP1 and PP2A phosphatases--cooperating partners in modulating retinoblastoma protein activation

The retinoblastoma/pocket protein family is one of the master regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle. It includes the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and the related p107 and p130 proteins. The importance of the Rb pathway for homeostasis and tumour suppression is evident from the fact that inactivating mutations in Rb are frequently associated with many cancers. Rbs regulate the cell cycle by controlling the activity of the E2F family of transcription factors. The activity of Rb proteins themselves is modulated by their phosphorylation status at several Ser/Thr residues: phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases inactivates Rb proteins and positively influences the transcription of genes necessary for cell cycle progression. Although the mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated inactivation of Rb proteins are understood in great detail, our knowledge of the process that counteracts Rb phosphorylation is still quite limited. The present review focuses on the Ser/Thr phosphatases that are responsible for the dephosphorylation and thus activation of Rb proteins. Two major scenarios are considered: (a) when pocket proteins are dephosphorylated during regular cell cycle progression and (b) when rapid dephosphorylation is dictated by external stress or growth inhibitory conditions, such as oxidative stress, UV radiation or other DNA-damaging stimuli, and cell differentiation factors. It transpires that protein phosphatase 1 and protein phosphatase 2A can efficiently modulate pocket protein activity in a highly context-dependent manner and both are tightly regulated by the presence of different regulatory subunits or interacting proteins.

An overlapping kinase and phosphatase docking site regulates activity of the retinoblastoma protein

The phosphorylation state and corresponding activity of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) are modulated by a balance of kinase and phosphatase activities. Here we characterize the association of Rb with the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c). A crystal structure identifies an enzyme-docking site in the Rb C-terminal domain that is required for efficient PP1c activity towards Rb. The phosphatase-docking site overlaps with the known docking site for Cyclin dependent kinase, and PP1 competition with Cdk-Cyclins for Rb binding is sufficient to retain Rb activity and block cell cycle advancement. These results provide the first detailed molecular insights into Rb activation and establish a novel mechanism for Rb regulation in which kinase and phosphatase compete for substrate docking.

Myosin phosphatase interacts with and dephosphorylates the retinoblastoma protein in THP-1 leukemic cells: its inhibition is involved in the attenuation of daunorubicin-induced cell death by calyculin-A

Reversible phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) is an important regulatory mechanism in cell cycle progression. The role of protein phosphatases is less understood in this process, especially concerning the regulatory/targeting subunits involved. It is shown that pretreatment of THP-1 leukemic cells with calyculin-A (CL-A), a cell-permeable phosphatase inhibitor, attenuated daunorubicin (DNR)-induced cell death and resulted in increased pRb phosphorylation and protection against proteolytic degradation. Protein phosphatase-1 catalytic subunits (PP1c) dephosphorylated the phosphorylated C-terminal fragment of pRb (pRb-C) slightly, whereas when PP1c was complexed to myosin phosphatase target subunit-1 (MYPT1) in myosin phosphatase (MP) holoenzyme dephosphorylation was stimulated. The pRb-C phosphatase activity of MP was partially inhibited by anti-MYPT1(1-296) implicating MYPT1 in targeting PP1c to pRb. MYPT1 became phosphorylated on both inhibitory sites (Thr695 and Thr850) upon CL-A treatment of THP-1 cells resulting in the inhibition of MP activity. MYPT1 and pRb coprecipitated from cell lysates by immunoprecipitation with either anti-MYPT1 or anti-pRb antibodies implying that pRb-MYPT1 interaction occurred at cellular levels. Surface plasmon resonance-based experiments confirmed binding of pRb-C to both PP1c and MYPT1. In control and DNR-treated cells, MYPT1 and pRb were predominantly localized in the nucleus exhibiting partial colocalization as revealed by immunofluorescence using confocal microscopy. Upon CL-A treatment, nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of both MYPT1 and pRb, but not PP1c, was observed. The above data imply that MP, with the targeting role of MYPT1, may regulate the phosphorylation level of pRb, thereby it may be involved in the control of cell cycle progression and in the mediation of chemoresistance of leukemic cells.

Normal regulation of Rbf1/E2f1 target genes in Drosophila type 1 protein phosphatase mutants

G1 Cyclin/Cdk complexes phosphorylate and inactivate the pRb tumor suppressor by preventing its ability to bind and repress E2F transcription factors. Current molecular and biochemical evidence suggests that type 1 protein phosphatases (PP1) dephosphorylate and thereby activate pRb, but the functional significance of this has not been addressed in the context of animal development. Here, we use genetic analyses to determine the role of PP1 in the regulation of Rbf1 activity during Drosophila development. While Rbf1 is required for E2f1 inhibition and G1 arrest in the embryonic epidermis and for the periodic expression of E2f1 target genes during endocycle S phase in the embryonic midgut and larval salivary gland, PP1 is not. PP1 regulates periodic cyclin E protein accumulation in ovarian nurse cells independently of Rbf1, which is dispensable for endocycle regulation in this tissue. We conclude that PP1 is not a major regulator of the Rbf1/E2F1 pathway in Drosophila.

SARP, a new alternatively spliced protein phosphatase 1 and DNA interacting protein

PP1 (protein phosphatase 1) is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase whose activity towards different substrates appears to be mediated via binding to specific proteins that play critical regulatory and targeting roles. In the present paper we report the cloning and characterization of a new protein, termed SARP (several ankyrin repeat protein), which is shown to interact with all isoforms of PP1 by a variety of techniques. A region encompassing a consensus PP1-binding motif in SARP (K354VHF357) modulates endogenous SARP-PP1 activity in mammalian cells. This SARP-PP1 interaction motif lies partially within the first ankyrin repeat in contrast with other proteins [53BP2 (p53 binding protein 2), MYPT1/M(110)/MBS (myosin binding protein of PP1) and TIMAP (transforming growth factor beta inhibited, membrane-associated protein)], where a PP1-binding motif precedes the ankyrin repeats. Alternative mRNA splicing produces several isoforms of SARP from a single human gene at locus 11q14. SARP1 and/or SARP2 (92-95 kDa) are ubiquitously expressed in all tissues with high levels in testis and sperm, where they are shown to interact with both PP1gamma1 and PP1gamma2. SARP3 (65 kDa) is most abundant in brain where SARP isoforms interact with both PP1alpha and PP1gamma1. SARP is highly abundant in the nucleus of mammalian cells, consistent with the putative nuclear localization signal at the N-terminus. The presence of a leucine zipper near the C-terminus of SARP1 and SARP2, and the binding of mammalian DNA to SARP2, suggests that SARP1 and SARP2 may be transcription factors or DNA-associated proteins that modulate gene expression.

Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor: where cancer meets the cell cycle

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene, Rb, was the first tumor suppressor identified and plays a fundamental role in regulation of progression through the cell cycle. This review details facets of RB protein function in cell cycle control and focuses on specific questions that remain intensive areas of investigation.

In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for the trisubstituted aminopurine cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors olomoucine, bohemine and CYC202

PURPOSE

To investigate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for the trisubstituted aminopurine cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors olomoucine, bohemine, and CYC202 (R-roscovitine; seliciclib) in the HCT116 human colon carcinoma model.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The in vitro activity of the agents was determined in a human tumor panel using the sulforhodamine B assay. The concentration and time dependence was established in HCT116 cells. Molecular biomarkers, including RB phosphorylation and cyclin expression, were assessed by Western blotting. Pharmacokinetic properties were characterized in mice following analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Based on these studies, a dosing regimen was developed for CYC202 that allowed therapeutic exposures in the HCT116 tumor xenograft.

RESULTS

The antitumor potency of the agents in vitro was in the order olomoucine (IC50, 56 micromol/L) < bohemine (IC50, 27 micromol/L) < CYC202 (IC50, 15 micromol/L), corresponding to their activities as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Antitumor activity increased with exposure time up to 16 hours. The agents caused inhibition of RB and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and depletion of cyclins. They exhibited relatively rapid clearance following administration to mice. CYC202 displayed the slowest clearance from plasma and the highest tumor uptake, with oral bioavailability of 86%. Oral dosing of CYC202 gave active concentrations in the tumor, modulation of pharmacodynamic markers, and inhibition of tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

CYC202 showed therapeutic activity on human cancer cell lines in vitro and on xenografts. Pharmacodynamic markers are altered in vitro and in vivo, consistent with the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. Such markers may be potentially useful in the clinical development of CYC202 and other cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors.

The Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CYC202 (R-roscovitine) inhibits retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, causes loss of Cyclin D1, and activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway

Deregulation of the cell cycle commonly occurs during tumorigenesis, resulting in unrestricted cell proliferation and independence from mitogens. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors have the potential to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. CYC202 (R-roscovitine) is a potent inhibitor of CDK2/cyclin E that is undergoing clinical trials. Drugs selected to act on a particular molecular target may exert additional or alternative effects in intact cells. We therefore studied the molecular pharmacology of CYC202 in human colon cancer cells. Treatment of HT29 and KM12 colon carcinoma cell lines with CYC202 decreased both retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation and total retinoblastoma protein. In addition, an increase in the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 was observed. As a result, downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway occurred, as demonstrated by an increase in ELK-1 phosphorylation and in c-FOS expression. Use of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases 1/2 inhibitors showed that the CYC202-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 phosphorylation was mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases 1/2 dependent but did not contribute to the cell cycle effects of the drug, which included a reduction of cells in G(1), inhibition of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation during S-phase, and a moderate increase in G(2)-M phase. Despite activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, cyclin D1 protein levels were decreased by CYC202, an effect that occurred simultaneously with loss of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation and inhibition of cell cycle progression. The reduced expression of cyclin D1 protein was independent of the p38(SAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways, which are known regulators of cyclin D1 protein. Interestingly, CYC202 caused a clear reduction in cyclins D1, A, and B1 mRNA, whereas c-FOS mRNA increased by 2-fold. This was accompanied by a loss of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and total RNA polymerase II protein, suggesting that CYC202 was inhibiting transcription, possibly via inhibition of CDK7 and CDK9 complexes. It can be concluded that although CYC202 can act as a CDK2 inhibitor, it also has the potential to inhibit CDK4 and CDK1 activities in cancer cells through the down-regulation of the corresponding cyclin partners. This provides a possible mechanism by which CYC202 can cause a reduction in retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation at multiple sites and cell cycle arrest in G(1), S, and G(2)-M phases. In addition to providing useful insights into the molecular pharmacology of CYC202 in human cancer cells, the results also suggest potential pharmacodynamic end points for use in clinical trials with the drug.

Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and genome stability

Retinoblastoma gene (Rb) is the prototype of tumor suppressors. Germline mutation in the retinoblastoma gene is susceptible to cancer and reintroduction of wild-type Rb is able to suppress neoplastic phenotypes. The fundamental cellular functions of Rb in the control of cell growth and differentiation are important for its tumor suppression. In general, cancer susceptibility caused by inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene results from genome instability. Accordingly, Rb may function in the maintenance of chromosome stability by influencing mitotic progression, faithful chromosome segregation, and structural remodeling of mitotic chromosomes. Rb is also implicated in the regulation of replication machinery and in the control of cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA damage, further supporting such a role for Rb. Moreover, the mechanistic basis for Rb-mediated transcriptional repression has revealed its connection to global chromatin remodeling. It is likely that Rb suppresses tumor formation by virtue of its multiple biological activities, and a theme throughout its multiple cellular functions is its central role in controlling activities that involve chromatin remodeling. A model in which Rb controls global genome fluidity is thus proposed. Finally, a recent study provides direct evidence indicating that loss of Rb function leads to genome instability. Therefore, tumor suppressors have a common role in the maintenance of genome stability, and such a role may be pivotal for their functions in tumor suppression.

Protein phosphatase 1 – targeted in many directions

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a major eukaryotic protein serine/threonine phosphatase that regulates an enormous variety of cellular functions through the interaction of its catalytic subunit (PP1c) with over fifty different established or putative regulatory subunits. Most of these target PP1c to specific subcellular locations and interact with a small hydrophobic groove on the surface of PP1c through a short conserved binding motif – the RVxF motif – which is often preceded by further basic residues. Weaker interactions may subsequently enhance binding and modulate PP1 activity/specificity in a variety of ways. Several putative targeting subunits do not possess an RVxF motif but nevertheless interact with the same region of PP1c. In addition, several ‘modulator’ proteins bind to PP1c but do not possess a domain targeting them to a specific location. Most are potent inhibitors of PP1c and possess at least two sites for interaction with PP1c, one of which is identical or similar to the RVxF motif.Regulation of PP1c in response to extracellular and intracellular signals occurs mostly through changes in the levels, conformation or phosphorylation status of targeting subunits. Understanding of the mode of action of PP1c complexes may facilitate development of drugs that target particular PP1c complexes and thereby modulate the phosphorylation state of a very limited subset of proteins.

Retinoblastoma protein partners

Studies of the retinoblastoma gene (Rb) have shown that its protein product (pRb) acts to restrict cell proliferation, inhibit apoptosis, and promote cell differentiation. The frequent mutation of the Rb gene, and the functional inactivation of pRb in tumor cells, have spurred interest in the mechanism of pRb action. Recently, much attention has focused on pRb's role in the regulation of the E2F transcription factor. However, biochemical studies have suggested that E2F is only one of many pRb-targets and, to date, at least 110 cellular proteins have been reported to associate with pRb. The plethora of pRb-binding proteins raises several important questions. How many functions does pRb possess, which of these functions are important for development, and which contribute to tumor suppression? The goal of this review is to summarize the current literature of pRb-associated proteins.

Site-specific and temporally-regulated retinoblastoma protein dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase type 1

pRb is dephosphorylated at mitotic exit by the type 1 serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PP1). Here we demonstrate for the first time that mitotic pRb dephosphorylation is a sequential, temporally-regulated event. We also provide evidence that the three mammalian isoforms of PP1, alpha, gamma-1, and delta, differ in their respective preferences for site-specific pRb dephosphorylation and that the mitotic and G(1) PP1-isoform counterparts exhibit differential activities towards mitotic pRb. Finally, the physiological relevance of the striking contrast between the patterns of Thr821 and Thr826 dephosphorylation, sites known to be important for disrupting binding of LXCXE-containing proteins to pRb, is addressed.

The carboxyl-terminal region of the retinoblastoma protein binds non-competitively to protein phosphatase type 1alpha and inhibits catalytic activity

pRB, a negative-growth regulatory protein, is a demonstrated substrate for type 1 serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PP1). In a recent report from this laboratory, we demonstrated that select forms of phosphorylated as well as hypophosphorylated pRB can be found complexed with the alpha-isotype of PP1 (PP1alpha). This complex can also be observed when PP1 is rendered catalytically dead by toxin inhibition. These data suggested to us that pRB may bind to PP1 at one or more sites other than the catalytically active one on the enzyme and that such binding may play a role other than bringing the substrate into contact with the enzyme to facilitate catalysis. To address this possibility we utilized a series of pRB deletion mutants and coprecipitation studies to map the pRB domain involved in binding to PP1. Together with competition assays using in vivo expression of SV40 T-antigen, we show here that the carboxyl-terminal region of pRB is both necessary and sufficient for physical interaction with PP1. Subsequent biochemical analyses demonstrated inhibition of PP1 catalytic activity toward the standard substrate phosphorylase a when this enzyme is bound to pRB containing this region. K(m) and V(max) calculations revealed that pRB binds to PP1 in a non-competitive manner. These data support the notion that pRB, in addition to being a substrate for PP1, also functions as a PP1 inhibitor. The significance of this finding with respect to the functional importance of this interaction is discussed.