Distinct methylalumoxane(MAO)-derived Me–MAO−anions in contact with a zirconocenium cation—a13C-NMR study

Sheet Models for Methylaluminoxane (MAO) Activators? A Theoretical Case Study involving rac-Me2Si(η5-C9H6)2Zr (SBIZr) Complexes

Activation of SBIZrMe2 or SBIZrMeCl and a sheet model for an active component of hydrolytic MAO, (MeAlO)16(Me3Al)6, (16,6) has been studied by DFT. Contact ion-pair formation occurs through the intermediacy of SBIZrMe(Cl) or SBIZrMe2 reacting with sheet 16,6 to furnish SBIZrMe-μ-X(MeAlO)16(Me3Al)6 (2, X=Me, Cl). Contact ion-pairs 2 would be in equilibrium with heterodinuclear catalyst precursors [SBIZrMe2AlMe2][(MeAlO)16(Me3Al)6X] (3 (X=Me, Cl) through reversible binding of Me3Al at higher Al : Zr ratios. Calculations show that formation of ion-pairs 3 from contact ion-pairs 2 is more favourable for the SBIZr compared with the parent Cp2Zr complexes. TD-DFT calculations were conducted on relevant SBIZr complexes to relate the results to earlier spectroscopic studies of catalyst activation using UV-Vis spectroscopy. Finally, propene insertion into ion-pairs 2, SBIZrMe-μ-MeB(C6F5)3 (6) and [SBIZrMe][B(C6F5)4] (7) was studied at M06-2X/TZVP level of theory. These studies suggest that contact ion-pairs 2 are significantly less reactive towards insertion than 6 or 7, in disagreement with experiment.

Cages versus Sheets: A Critical Comparison in the Size Range Expected for Methylaluminoxane (MAO)

New cage models (MeAlO)n (Me3 Al)m (n=16, m=6 or 7) isomeric with previously reported sheet models for the principle activator found in hydrolytic MAO (h-MAO) are compared at M06-2X and MN15 levels of theory using density functional theory with respect to their thermodynamic stability. Reactivity of the neutrals or corresponding anions with formula [(MeAlO)16 (Me3 Al)6 Me]- towards chlorination, and loss of Me3 Al is explored while reactivity of the neutrals towards formation of contact- and outer-sphere ion pairs from Cp2 ZrMe2 and Cp2 ZrMeCl is examined. The results suggest on balance that a cage model for this activator is less consistent with experiment than an isomeric sheet model, although the latter are more stable based on free energy.

Ionization of Cp2 ZrMe2 and Lewis Bases by Methylaluminoxane: Computational Insights

The interactions of the Lewis bases CO, octamethyltrisiloxane (OMTS) and 2,2'-bipyridine (bipy) with a sheet model for the principal activator (MeAlO)₁₆ (Me₃ Al)₆ (16,6) in hydrolytic methylaluminoxane (MAO) were investigated by DFT. These studies reveal that OMTS and bipy form adducts with Me₃ Al prior to methide abstraction by 16,6 to form the ion-pairs [Me₂ Al(κ² -L)][16,6] (5: L=OMTS, 6: L=bipy, [16,6]^- =[(MeAlO)₁₆ (Me₃ Al)₆ Me]^- ) while CO simply binds to a reactive edge site without ionization. The binding and activation of Cp₂ ZrMe₂ with 16,6 to form both neutral adducts 1 Cp₂ ZrMe₂ ⋅16,6 and contact ion-pairs 4 and 7, both with formula [Cp₂ ZrMe][μ-Me(MeAlO)₁₆ (Me₃ Al)₆ ], featuring terminal and chelated MAO-anions, respectively was studied by DFT. The displacement of the anion with either excess Cp₂ ZrMe₂ or Me₃ Al was also studied, forming outer-sphere ion-pairs [(Cp₂ ZrMe)₂ μ-Me][16,6] (2) and [Cp₂ Zr(μ-Me)₂ AlMe₂ ][16,6] (3). The theoretical NMR spectra of these species were compared to experimental spectra of MAO and Cp₂ ZrMe₂ and found to be in good agreement with the reported data and assignments. These studies confirm that 16,6 is a very suitable model for the activators present in MAO but highlight the difficulty in accurately calculating thermodynamic quantities for molecules in this size regime.

Reactivity Trends of Lewis Acidic Sites in Methylaluminoxane and Some of Its Modifications

The established model cluster (AlOMe)16(AlMe3)6 for methylaluminoxane (MAO) cocatalyst has been studied by density functional theory, aiming to rationalize the different behaviors of unmodified MAO and TMA-depleted MAO/BHT (TMA = trimethylaluminum; BHT = 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol), highlighted in previous experimental studies. The tendency of the three model Lewis acidic sites A-C to release neutral Al fragments (i.e., AlMe2R; R = Me or bht) or transient aluminum cations (i.e., [AlMeR]+) has been investigated both in the absence and in the presence of neutral N-donors. Sites C are most likely responsible for the activation capabilities of TMA-rich MAO, but TMA depletion destabilizes them, possibly inducing structural rearrangements. The remaining sites A and B, albeit of lower Lewis acidity, should be still able to release cationic Al fragments when TMA-depleted modified MAOs are treated with N-donors (e.g. [AlMe(bht)]+ from MAO/BHT). These findings provide tentative interpretations for earlier observations of donor-dependent ionization tendencies of MAO and MAO/BHT and how TMA depleted MAOs can still be potent activators.

Mass spectrometric characterization of methylaluminoxane-activated metallocene complexes

Electrospray-ionization mass spectrometric studies of poly(methylaluminoxane) (MAO) in the presence of [Cp2 ZrMe2 ], [Cp2 ZrMe(Cl)], and [Cp2 ZrCl2 ] in fluorobenzene (PhF) solution are reported. The results demonstrate that alkylation and ionization are separate events that occur at competitive rates in a polar solvent. Furthermore, there are significant differences in ion-pair speciation that result from the use of metallocene dichloride complexes in comparison to alkylated precursors at otherwise identical Al/Zr ratios. Finally, the counter anions that form are dependent on the choice of precursor and Al/Zr ratio; halogenated aluminoxane anions [(MeAlO)x (Me3 Al)y-z (Me2 AlCl)z Me](-) (z=1, 2, 3…︁) are observed using metal chloride complexes and under some conditions may predominate over their non-halogenated precursors [(MeAlO)x (Me3 Al)y Me](-) . Specifically, this halogenation process appears selective for the anions that form in comparison to the neutral components of MAO. Only at very high Al/Zr ratios is the same "native" anion distribution observed when using [Cp2 ZrCl2 ] when compared with [Cp2 ZrMe2 ]. Together, the results suggest that the need for a large excess of MAO when using metallocene dichloride complexes is a reflection of competitive alkylation vs. ionization, the persistence of unreactive, homodinuclear ion pairs in the case of [Cp2 ZrCl2 ], as well as a change in ion pairing resulting from modification of the anions formed at lower Al/Zr ratios. Models for neutral precursors and anions are examined computationally.

Rapid evaluation of catalysts and MAO activators by kinetics: what controls polymer molecular weight and activity in metallocene/MAO catalysts?

The influence of methylaluminoxane (MAO) catalyst activators of different concentrations and preparative histories on the performance of 1-hexene polymerisations was investigated by kinetic methods, using rac-Me2Si(2-Me-Benz[e]Ind)2ZrCl2 as the standard catalyst precursor. Fast sampling and analysis allow the time dependence of monomer conversion and the growth of the number-average polymer molecular weight to be determined at a sufficiently short timescale to make this a feasible method for routine catalyst evaluation. Differences in productivity, polymer molecular weight and active species count are shown to be primarily a linear function of the trimethylaluminium concentration. The results in toluene and heptane as solvents are compared; the data show that the inferior performance in heptane is due to a substantially lower active species concentration.