Differential regulation of class IA phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalytic subunits p110 alpha and beta by protease-activated receptor 2 and beta-arrestins

Airway epithelial overexpressed cathepsin K induces airway remodelling through epithelial-mesenchymal trophic unit activation in asthma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Airway epithelial cells (AECs) regulate the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal trophic units (EMTUs) during airway remodelling through secretion of signalling mediators. However, the major trigger and the intrinsic pathogenesis of airway remodelling is still obscure.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The differing expressed genes in airway epithelia related to airway remodelling were screened and verified by RNA-sequencing and signalling pathway analysis. Then, the effects of increased cathepsin K (CTSK) in airway epithelia on airway remodelling and EMTU activation were identified both in vitro and in vivo, and the molecular mechanism was elucidated in the EMTU model. The potential of CTSK as an an effective biomarker of airway remodelling was analysed in an asthma cohort of differing severity. Finally, an inhibitor of CTSK was administered for potential therapeutic intervention for airway remodelling in asthma.

KEY RESULTS

The expression of CTSK in airway epithelia increased significantly along with the development of airway remodelling in a house dust mite (HDM)-stressed asthma model. Increased secretion of CTSK from airway epithelia induced the activation of EMTUs by activation of the PAR2-mediated pathway. Blockade of CTSK inhibited EMTU activation and alleviated airway remodelling as an effective intervention target of airway remodelling.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Increased expression of CTSK in airway epithelia is involved in the development of airway remodelling in asthma through EMTU activation, mediated partly through the PAR2-mediated signalling pathway. CTSK is a potential biomarker for airway remodelling, and may also be a useful intervention target for airway remodelling in asthma patients.

Par2-mediated responses in inflammation and regeneration: choosing between repair and damage

The protease activated receptor 2 (Par2) plays a pivotal role in various damage models, influencing injury, proliferation, inflammation, and regeneration. Despite extensive studies, its binary roles- EITHER aggravating injury or promoting recovery-make a conclusive translational decision on its modulation strategy elusive. Analyzing two liver regeneration models, autoimmune hepatitis and direct hepatic damage, we discovered Par2's outcome depends on the injury's nature. In immune-mediated injury, Par2 exacerbates damage, while in direct tissue injury, it promotes regeneration. Subsequently, we evaluated the clinical significance of this finding by investigating Par2's expression in the context of autoimmune diabetes. We found that the absence of Par2 in all lymphocytes provided full protection against the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing β-cells in mice, whereas the introduction of a β-cell-specific Par2 null mutation accelerated the onset of autoimmune diabetes. This pattern led us to hypothesize whether these observations are universal. A comprehensive review of recent Par2 publications across tissues and systems confirms the claim drafted above: Par2's initial activation in the immune system aggravates inflammation, hindering recovery, whereas its primary activation in the damaged tissue fosters regeneration. As a membrane-anchored receptor, Par2 emerges as an attractive drug target. Our findings highlight a crucial translational modulation strategy in regenerative medicine based on injury type.

Upregulated Apelin Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer Activates Oncogenic Signaling Pathways to Promote Tumor Development

Despite decades of effort in understanding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), there is still a lack of innovative targeted therapies for this devastating disease. Herein, we report the expression of apelin and its receptor, APJ, in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its protumoral function. Apelin and APJ protein expression in tumor tissues from patients with PDAC and their spatiotemporal pattern of expression in engineered mouse models of PDAC were investigated by immunohistochemistry. Apelin signaling function in tumor cells was characterized in pancreatic tumor cell lines by Western blot as well as proliferation, migration assays and in murine orthotopic xenograft experiments. In premalignant lesions, apelin was expressed in epithelial lesions whereas APJ was found in isolated cells tightly attached to premalignant lesions. However, in the invasive stage, apelin and APJ were co-expressed by tumor cells. In human tumor cells, apelin induced a long-lasting activation of PI3K/Akt, upregulated β-catenin and the oncogenes c-myc and cyclin D1 and promoted proliferation, migration and glucose uptake. Apelin receptor blockades reduced cancer cell proliferation along with a reduction in pancreatic tumor burden. These findings identify the apelin signaling pathway as a new actor for PDAC development and a novel therapeutic target for this incurable disease.

Altered CXCR4 dynamics at the cell membrane impairs directed cell migration in WHIM syndrome patients

SignificanceNew imaging-based approaches are incorporating new concepts to our knowledge of biological processes. The analysis of receptor dynamics involved in cell movement using single-particle tracking demonstrates that cells require chemokine-mediated receptor clustering to sense appropriately chemoattractant gradients. Here, we report that this process does not occur in T cells expressing CXCR4^R334X, a mutant form of CXCR4 linked to WHIM syndrome (warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathexis). The underlaying molecular mechanism involves inappropriate actin cytoskeleton remodeling due to the inadequate β-arrestin1 activation by CXCR4^R334X, which alters its lateral mobility and spatial organization. These defects, associated to CXCR4^R334X expression, contribute to the retention of hematopoietic precursors in bone marrow niches and explain the severe immunological symptoms associated with WHIM syndrome.

PAR2 promotes high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis by inhibiting AMPK-mediated autophagy

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a member of G protein-coupled receptors. There are two types of PAR2 signaling pathways: Canonical G-protein signaling and β-arrestin signaling. Although PAR2 signaling has been reported to aggravate hepatic steatosis, the exact mechanism is still unclear, and the role of PAR2 in autophagy remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the regulatory role of PAR2 in autophagy during high-fat diet (HFD)-induced hepatic steatosis in mice. Increased protein levels of PAR2 and β-arrestin-2 and their interactions were detected after four months of HFD. To further investigate the role of PAR2, male and female wild-type (WT) and PAR2-knockout (PAR2 KO) mice were fed HFD. PAR2 deficiency protected HFD-induced hepatic steatosis in male mice, but not in female mice. Interestingly, PAR2-deficient liver showed increased AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation with decreased interaction between Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase β (CAMKKβ) and β-arrestin-2. In addition, PAR2 deficiency up-regulated autophagy in the liver. To elucidate whether PAR2 plays a role in the regulation of autophagy and lipid accumulation in vitro, PAR2 was overexpressed in HepG2 cells. Overexpression of PAR2 decreased AMPK activation with increased interaction of CAMKKβ with β-arrestin-2 and significantly inhibited autophagic responses in HepG2 cells. Inhibition of autophagy by PAR2 overexpression further exacerbated palmitate-induced lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that the increase in the PAR2-β-arrestin-2-CAMKKβ complex by HFD inhibits AMPK-mediated autophagy, leading to the alleviation of hepatic steatosis.

GLP-1 modulates insulin-induced relaxation response through β-arrestin2 regulation in diabetic mice aortas

AIMS

Diabetes impairs insulin-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation by reducing nitric oxide (NO) production. GLP-1, an incretin hormone, has been shown to prevent the development of endothelial dysfunction. In this study, we hypothesized that GLP-1 would improve the impaired insulin-induced relaxation response in diabetic mice. We also examined the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

Using aortic rings from ob/ob mice, an animal model of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and from lean mice, vascular relaxation responses and protein expressions were evaluated using insulin, GLP-1, and pathway-specific inhibitors to elucidate the mechanisms of response. In parallel experiments, β-arrestin2 siRNA-transfected aortas were treated with GLP-1 to evaluate its effects on aortic response pathways.

RESULTS

When compared to that of untreated ob/ob aortas, GLP-1 increased insulin-induced vasorelaxation and NO production. AMPK inhibition did not alter this vasorelaxation in both GLP-1-treated lean and ob/ob aortas, while Akt inhibition reduced vasorelaxation in both groups, and co-treatment with GLP-1 and insulin caused Akt/eNOS activation. Additionally, GLP-1 decreased GRK2 activity and enhanced β-arrestin2 translocation from the cytosol to membrane in ob/ob aortas. β-Arrestin2 siRNA decreased insulin-induced relaxation both in lean aortas and GLP-1-treated ob/ob aortas.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that insulin-induced relaxation is dependent on β-arrestin2 translocation and Akt activation via GLP-1-stimulated GRK2 inactivation in ob/ob aortas. We showed a novel cross-talk between GLP-1-responsive β-arrestin2 and insulin signalling in diabetic aortas.

β-Arrestins: Multitask Scaffolds Orchestrating the Where and When in Cell Signalling

The β-arrestins (β-arrs) were initially appreciated for the roles they play in the desensitization and endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are now also known to act as multifunctional adaptor proteins binding many non-receptor protein partners to control multiple signalling pathways. β-arrs therefore act as key regulatory hubs at the crossroads of external cell inputs and functional outputs in cellular processes ranging from gene transcription to cell growth, survival, cytoskeletal regulation, polarity, and migration. An increasing number of studies have also highlighted the scaffolding roles β-arrs play in vivo in both physiological and pathological conditions, which opens up therapeutic avenues to explore. In this introductory review chapter, we discuss the functional roles that β-arrs exert to control GPCR function, their dynamic scaffolding roles and how this impacts signal transduction events, compartmentalization of β-arrs, how β-arrs are regulated themselves, and how the combination of these events culminates in cellular regulation.

Non-visual arrestins regulate the focal adhesion formation via small GTPases RhoA and Rac1 independently of GPCRs

Arrestins recruit a variety of signaling proteins to active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors in the plasma membrane and to the cytoskeleton. Loss of arrestins leads to decreased cell migration, altered cell shape, and an increase in focal adhesions. Small GTPases of the Rho family are molecular switches that regulate actin cytoskeleton and affect a variety of dynamic cellular functions including cell migration and cell morphology. Here we show that non-visual arrestins differentially regulate RhoA and Rac1 activity to promote cell spreading via actin reorganization, and focal adhesion formation via two distinct mechanisms. Arrestins regulate these small GTPases independently of G-protein-coupled receptor activation.

The Diverse Roles of Arrestin Scaffolds in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling

The visual/β-arrestins, a small family of proteins originally described for their role in the desensitization and intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), have emerged as key regulators of multiple signaling pathways. Evolutionarily related to a larger group of regulatory scaffolds that share a common arrestin fold, the visual/β-arrestins acquired the capacity to detect and bind activated GPCRs on the plasma membrane, which enables them to control GPCR desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking. By acting as scaffolds that bind key pathway intermediates, visual/β-arrestins both influence the tonic level of pathway activity in cells and, in some cases, serve as ligand-regulated scaffolds for GPCR-mediated signaling. Growing evidence supports the physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of arrestins and underscores their potential as therapeutic targets. Circumventing arrestin-dependent GPCR desensitization may alleviate the problem of tachyphylaxis to drugs that target GPCRs, and find application in the management of chronic pain, asthma, and psychiatric illness. As signaling scaffolds, arrestins are also central regulators of pathways controlling cell growth, migration, and survival, suggesting that manipulating their scaffolding functions may be beneficial in inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, and cancer. In this review we examine the structure-function relationships that enable arrestins to perform their diverse roles, addressing arrestin structure at the molecular level, the relationship between arrestin conformation and function, and sites of interaction between arrestins, GPCRs, and nonreceptor-binding partners. We conclude with a discussion of arrestins as therapeutic targets and the settings in which manipulating arrestin function might be of clinical benefit.

Coagulation and non-coagulation effects of thrombin

Thrombin is a multifunctional serine protease produced from prothrombin, and is a key regulator in hemostatic and non-hemostatic processes. It is the main effector protease in primary hemostasis by activating platelets, and plays a key role in secondary hemostasis. Besides its well-known functions in hemostasis, thrombin also plays a role in various non-hemostatic biological and pathophysiologic processes, predominantly mediated through activation of protease-activated receptors (PARs). Depending on several factors, such as the concentration of thrombin, the duration of activation, the location of PARs, the presence of coreceptors, and the formation of PAR heterodimers, activation of the receptor by thrombin can induce different cellular responses. Moreover, thrombin can have opposing effects in the same cell; it can induce both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signals. Owing to the complexity of thrombin's signal transduction pathways, the exact mechanism behind the dichotomy of thrombin is yet still unknown. In this review, we highlight the hemostatic and non-hemostatic functions of thrombin, and specifically focus on the non-hemostatic dual role of thrombin under various conditions and in relation to cardiovascular disease.

β-Arrestin2 Contributes to Cell Viability and Proliferation via the Down-Regulation of FOXO1 in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

β-Arrestin2 has been identified to act as a corepressor of androgen receptor (AR) signaling by binding to AR and serving as a scaffold to affect the activity and expression of AR in androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells; however, little is known regarding its role in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression. Here, our data demonstrated that β-arrestin2 contributes to the cell viability and proliferation of CRPC via the downregulation of FOXO1 activity and expression. Mechanistically, in addition to its requirement for FOXO1 phosphorylation induced by IGF-1, β-arrestin2 could inhibit FOXO1 activity in an Akt-independent manner and delay FOXO1 dephosphorylation through the inhibition of PP2A phosphatase activity and the attenuation of the interaction between FOXO1 and PP2A. Furthermore, β-arrestin2 could downregulate FOXO1 expression via ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Together, our results identified a novel role for β-arrestin2 in the modulation of the CRPC progress through FOXO1. Thus, the characterization of β-arrestin2 may represent an alternative therapeutic target for CRPC treatment.

Proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) decreases apoptosis in colonic epithelial cells

Mucosal biopsies from inflamed colon of inflammatory bowel disease patients exhibit elevated epithelial apoptosis compared with those from healthy individuals, disrupting mucosal homeostasis and perpetuating disease. Therapies that decrease intestinal epithelial apoptosis may, therefore, ameliorate inflammatory bowel disease, but treatments that specifically target apoptotic pathways are lacking. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2), a G protein-coupled receptor activated by trypsin-like serine proteinases, is expressed on intestinal epithelial cells and stimulates mitogenic pathways upon activation. We sought to determine whether PAR2 activation and signaling could rescue colonic epithelial (HT-29) cells from apoptosis induced by proapoptotic cytokines that are increased during inflammatory bowel disease. The PAR2 agonists 2-furoyl-LIGRLO (2f-LI), SLIGKV and trypsin all significantly reduced cleavage of caspase-3, -8, and -9, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, and the externalization of phosphatidylserine after treatment of cells with IFN-γ and TNF-α. Knockdown of PAR2 with siRNA eliminated the anti-apoptotic effect of 2f-LI and increased the sensitivity of HT-29 cells to cytokine-induced apoptosis. Concurrent inhibition of both MEK1/2 and PI3K was necessary to inhibit PAR2-induced survival. 2f-LI was found to increase phosphorylation and inactivation of pro-apoptotic BAD at Ser(112) and Ser(136) by MEK1/2 and PI3K-dependent signaling, respectively. PAR2 activation also increased the expression of anti-apoptotic MCL-1. Simultaneous knockdown of both BAD and MCL-1 had minimal effects on PAR2-induced survival, whereas single knockdown had no effect. We conclude that PAR2 activation reduces cytokine-induced epithelial apoptosis via concurrent stimulation of MEK1/2 and PI3K but little involvement of MCL-1 and BAD. Our findings represent a novel mechanism whereby serine proteinases facilitate epithelial cell survival and may be important in the context of colonic healing.

Role for β-arrestin in mediating paradoxical β2AR and PAR2 signaling in asthma

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) utilize (at least) two signal transduction pathways to elicit cellular responses including the classic G protein-dependent, and the more recently discovered β-arrestin-dependent, signaling pathways. In human and murine models of asthma, agonist-activation of β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) or Protease-activated-receptor-2 (PAR2) results in relief from bronchospasm via airway smooth muscle relaxation. However, chronic activation of these receptors, leads to pro-inflammatory responses. One plausible explanation underlying the paradoxical effects of β2AR and PAR2 agonism in asthma is that the beneficial and harmful effects are associated with distinct signaling pathways. Specifically, G protein-dependent signaling mediates relaxation of airway smooth muscle, whereas β-arrestin-dependent signaling promotes inflammation. This review explores the evidence supporting the hypothesis that β-arrestin-dependent signaling downstream of β2AR and PAR2 is detrimental in asthma and examines the therapeutic opportunities for selectively targeting this pathway.

Arrestins as regulatory hubs in cancer signalling pathways

Non-visual arrestins were initially appreciated for the roles they play in the negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptors through the processes of desensitisation and endocytosis. The arrestins are also now known as protein scaffolding platforms that act downstream of multiple types of receptors, ensuring relevant transmission of information for an appropriate cellular response. They function as regulatory hubs in several important signalling pathways that are often dysregulated in human cancers. Interestingly, several recent studies have documented changes in expression and localisation of arrestins that occur during cancer progression and that correlate with clinical outcome. Here, we discuss these advances and how changes in expression/localisation may affect functional outputs of arrestins in cancer biology.

Endosomal signaling and oncogenesis

The endosomal system provides a route whereby nutrients, viruses, and receptors are internalized. During the course of endocytosis, activated receptors can accumulate within endosomal structures and certain signal-transducing molecules can be recruited to endosomal membranes. In the context of signaling and cancer, they provide platforms within the cell from which signals can be potentiated or attenuated. Regulation of the duration of receptor signaling is a pivotal means of refining growth responses in cells. In cancers, this is often considered in terms of mutations that affect receptor tyrosine kinases and maintain them in hyperactivated states of dimerization and/or phosphorylation. However, disruption to the regulatory control exerted by the assembly of protein complexes within the endosomal network can also contribute to disease among which oncogenesis is characterized in part by dysregulated growth, enhanced cell survival, and changes in the expression of markers of differentiation. In this chapter, we will discuss the role of proteins that regulate in endocytosis as tumor suppressors or oncogenes and how changing the fate of internalized receptors and concomitant endosomal signaling can contribute to cancer.

CXCR7 participates in CXCL12-induced CD34+ cell cycling through β-arrestin-dependent Akt activation

In addition to its well-known effect on migration and homing of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), CXCL12 chemokine also exhibits a cell cycle and survival-promoting factor for human CD34(+) HSPCs. CXCR4 was suggested to be responsible for CXCL12-induced biological effects until the recent discovery of its second receptor, CXCR7. Until now, the participation of CXCR7 in CXCL12-induced HSPC cycling and survival is unknown. We show here that CXCL12 was capable of binding CXCR7 despite its scarce expression at CD34(+) cell surface. Blocking CXCR7 inhibited CXCL12-induced Akt activation as well as the percentage of CD34(+) cells in cycle, colony formation, and survival, demonstrating its participation in CXCL12-induced functional effects in HSPCs. At steady state, CXCR7 and β-arrestin2 co-localized near the plasma membrane of CD34(+) cells. After CXCL12 treatment, β-arrestin2 translocated to the nucleus, and this required both CXCR7 and CXCR4. Silencing β-arrestin expression decreased CXCL12-induced Akt activation in CD34(+) cells. Our results demonstrate for the first time the role of CXCR7, complementary to that played by CXCR4, in the control of HSPC cycling, survival, and colony formation induced by CXCL12. We also provide evidence for the involvement of β-arrestins as signaling hubs downstream of both CXCL12 receptors in primary human HSPCs.

β-Arrestin-kinase scaffolds: turn them on or turn them off?

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can signal through heterotrimeric G-proteins or through β-arrestins to elicit responses to a plethora of extracellular stimuli. While the mechanisms underlying G-protein signaling is relatively well understood, the mechanisms by which β-arrestins regulate the diverse set of proteins with which they associate remain unclear. Multi-protein complexes are a common feature of β-arrestin-dependent signaling. The first two such complexes discovered were the mitogen-activated kinases modules associated with extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1/2) and Jnk3. Subsequently a number of other kinases have been shown to undergo β-arrestin-dependent regulation, including Akt, phosphatidylinositol-3kinase (PI3K), Lim-domain-containing kinase (LIMK), calcium calmodulin kinase II (CAMKII), and calcium calmodulin kinase kinase β (CAMKKβ). Some are positively and some negatively regulated by β-arrestin association. One of the missing links to understanding these pathways is the molecular mechanisms by which the activity of these kinases is regulated. Do β-arrestins merely serve as scaffolds to bring enzyme and substrate together or do they have a direct effect on the enzymatic activities of target kinases? Recent evidence suggests that both mechanisms are involved and that the mechanisms by which β-arrestins regulate kinase activity varies with the target kinase. This review discusses recent advances in the field focusing on 5 kinases for which considerable mechanistic detail and specific sites of interaction have been elucidated.

β-Arrestins: modulators of small GTPase activation and function

Most cellular events responsible for accurate G protein-coupled receptor trafficking involve small GTP-binding proteins. For example, trafficking of receptors via the endocytic and exocytic pathways requires activation of ADP-ribosylation factors and Rab proteins, while receptor-mediated complex responses such as migration are well characterized to be dependent upon Rho family members. Because β-arrestin proteins are recruited to activated receptors and now considered as key signaling molecules, whether they act to control small GTPase activity remains a subject of great interest. Over the years, considerable evidence has suggested that β-arrestins and GTPases might be effectors of the same signaling pathways. One example is the roles of both β-arrestin and Ras, the prototypical GTPase, in coordinating activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Recently developed tools effective in suppressing the expression of β-arrestins will help define whether they are essential for small G protein activation. Furthermore, novel approaches to identify protein complexes will greatly advance our understanding of the possible cross talk between β-arrestin and small GTPases.

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Gα-interacting protein GIV promotes activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase during cell migration

GIV (Gα-interacting vesicle-associated protein; also known as Girdin) enhances Akt activation downstream of multiple growth factor- and G protein (heterotrimeric guanosine 5'-triphosphate-binding protein)-coupled receptors to trigger cell migration and cancer invasion. We demonstrate that GIV is a tyrosine phosphoprotein that directly binds to and activates phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Upon ligand stimulation of various receptors, GIV was phosphorylated at tyrosine-1764 and tyrosine-1798 by both receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases. These phosphorylation events enabled direct binding of GIV to the amino- and carboxyl-terminal Src homology 2 domains of p85α, a regulatory subunit of PI3K; stabilized receptor association with PI3K; and enhanced PI3K activity at the plasma membrane to trigger cell migration. Tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV and its association with p85α increased during metastatic progression of a breast carcinoma. These results suggest a mechanism by which multiple receptors activate PI3K through tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV, thereby making the GIV-PI3K interaction a potential therapeutic target within the PI3K-Akt pathway.

Tissue factor-protease-activated receptor 2 signaling promotes diet-induced obesity and adipose inflammation

Tissue factor (TF), the initiator of the coagulation cascade, mediates coagulation factor VIIa-dependent activation of protease activated receptor-2 (PAR2). Here we delineate an unexpected role for coagulation signaling in obesity and its complications. Mice lacking PAR2 (F2rl1) or the cytoplasmic domain of TF (F3) are protected from high fat diet (HFD) induced weight gain and insulin resistance. In hematopoietic cells, genetic deletion of TF-PAR2 signaling reduces adipose tissue macrophage inflammation and specific pharmacological inhibition of macrophage TF signaling rapidly ameliorates insulin resistance. In contrast, non-hematopoietic cell TF-VIIa-PAR2 signaling specifically promotes obesity. Mechanistically, adipocyte TF cytoplasmic domain dependent VIIa signaling suppresses Akt phosphorylation with concordant adverse transcriptional changes of key regulators of obesity and metabolism. Pharmacological blockade of adipocyte TF in vivo reverses these effects of TF-VIIa signaling and rapidly improves energy expenditure. Thus, TF signaling is a potential therapeutic target to improve impaired metabolism and insulin resistance in obesity.

Protease-activated receptor 2 signaling in inflammation

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by proteolytical cleavage of the amino-terminus and thereby act as sensors for extracellular proteases. While coagulation proteases activate PARs to regulate hemostasis, thrombosis, and cardiovascular function, PAR2 is also activated in extravascular locations by a broad array of serine proteases, including trypsin, tissue kallikreins, coagulation factors VIIa and Xa, mast cell tryptase, and transmembrane serine proteases. Administration of PAR2-specific agonistic and antagonistic peptides, as well as studies in PAR2 knockout mice, identified critical functions of PAR2 in development, inflammation, immunity, and angiogenesis. Here, we review these roles of PAR2 with an emphasis on the role of coagulation and other extracellular protease pathways that cleave PAR2 in epithelial, immune, and neuronal cells to regulate physiological and pathophysiological processes.

β-arrestin-dependent actin reorganization: bringing the right players together at the leading edge

First identified as mediators of G-protein-coupled receptor desensitization and internalization and later as signaling platforms, β-arrestins play a requisite role in chemotaxis and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, downstream of multiple receptors. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying their involvement have remained elusive. Initial interest in β-arrestins as facilitators of cell migration and actin reorganization stemmed from the known interplay between receptor endocytosis and actin filament formation, because disruption of the actin cytoskeleton inhibits these β-arrestin-dependent events. With growing interest in the mechanisms by which cells can sense a gradient of agonist during cell migration, investigators began to hypothesize that β-arrestins may contribute to directed migration by controlling chemotactic receptor turnover at the plasma membrane. Finally, increasing evidence emerged that β-arrestins are more than just clathrin adaptor proteins involved in turning off receptor signals; they are actually capable of generating their own signals by scaffolding signaling molecules and controlling the activity of multiple cellular enzymes. This new role of β-arrestins as signaling scaffolds has led to the hypothesis that they can facilitate cell migration by sequestering actin assembly activities and upstream regulators of actin assembly at the leading edge. This Minireview discusses recent advances in our understanding of how β-arrestin scaffolds contribute to cell migration, focusing on recently identified β-arrestin interacting proteins and phosphorylation targets that have known roles in actin reorganization.

Distinct functional outputs of PTEN signalling are controlled by dynamic association with β-arrestins

The tumour suppressor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin deleted on chromosome 10) regulates major cellular functions via lipid phosphatase-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Despite its fundamental pathophysiological importance, how PTEN's cellular activity is regulated has only been partially elucidated. We report that the scaffolding proteins β-arrestins (β-arrs) are important regulators of PTEN. Downstream of receptor-activated RhoA/ROCK signalling, β-arrs activate the lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN to negatively regulate Akt and cell proliferation. In contrast, following wound-induced RhoA activation, β-arrs inhibit the lipid phosphatase-independent anti-migratory effects of PTEN. β-arrs can thus differentially control distinct functional outputs of PTEN important for cell proliferation and migration.

Apical and basolateral pools of proteinase-activated receptor-2 direct distinct signaling events in the intestinal epithelium

Studies suggest that there are two distinct pools of proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR₂) present in intestinal epithelial cells: an apical pool accessible from the lumen, and a basolateral pool accessible from the interstitial space and blood. Although introduction of PAR₂ agonists such as 2-furoyl-LIGRL-O-NH₂ (2fAP) to the intestinal lumen can activate PAR₂, the presence of accessible apical PAR₂ has not been definitively shown. Furthermore, some studies have suggested that basolateral PAR₂ responses in the intestinal epithelium are mediated indirectly by neuropeptides released from enteric nerve fibers, rather than by intestinal PAR₂ itself. Here we identified accessible pools of both apical and basolateral PAR₂ in cultured Caco2-BBe monolayers and in mouse ileum. Activation of basolateral PAR₂ transiently increased short-circuit current by activating electrogenic Cl⁻ secretion, promoted dephosphorylation of the actin filament-severing protein, cofilin, and activated the transcription factor, AP-1, whereas apical PAR₂ did not. In contrast, both pools of PAR₂ activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) via temporally and mechanistically distinct pathways. Apical PAR₂ promoted a rapid, biphasic PLCβ/Ca²(+)/PKC-dependent ERK1/2 activation, resulting in nuclear localization, whereas basolateral PAR₂ promoted delayed ERK1/2 activation which was predominantly restricted to the cytosol, involving both PLCβ/Ca²(+) and β-arrestin-dependent pathways. These results suggest that the outcome of PAR₂ activation is dependent on the specific receptor pool that is activated, allowing for fine-tuning of the physiological responses to different agonists.

Beta-arrestins as regulators of signal termination and transduction: how do they determine what to scaffold?

Over the last decade β-arrestins have emerged as pleiotropic scaffold proteins, capable of mediating numerous diverse responses to multiple agonists. Most well characterized are the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) stimulated β-arrestin signals, which are sometimes synergistic with, and sometimes independent of, heterotrimeric G-protein signals. β-arrestin signaling involves the recruitment of downstream signaling moieties to β-arrestins; in many cases specific sites of interaction between β-arrestins and the downstream target have been identified. As more information unfolds about the nature of β-arrestin scaffolding interactions, it is evident that these proteins are capable of adopting multiple conformations which in turn reveal a specific set of interacting domains. Recruitment of β-arrestin to a specific GPCR can promote formation of a specific subset of available β-arrestin scaffolds, allowing for a higher level of specificity to given agonists. This review discusses recent advances in β-arrestin signaling, discussing the molecular details of a subset of known β-arrestin scaffolds and the significance of specific binding interactions on the ultimate cellular response.

Beta-arrestin inhibits CAMKKbeta-dependent AMPK activation downstream of protease-activated-receptor-2

Background

Proteinase-activated-receptor-2 (PAR₂) is a seven transmembrane receptor that can activate two separate signaling arms: one through Gαq and Ca²⁺ mobilization, and a second through recruitment of β-arrestin scaffolds. In some cases downstream targets of the Gαq/Ca²⁺ signaling arm are directly inhibited by β-arrestins, while in other cases the two pathways are synergistic; thus β-arrestins act as molecular switches capable of modifying the signal generated by the receptor.

Results

Here we demonstrate that PAR₂ can activate adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key regulator of cellular energy balance, through Ca²⁺-dependent Kinase Kinase β (CAMKKβ), while inhibiting AMPK through interaction with β-arrestins. The ultimate outcome of PAR₂ activation depended on the cell type studied; in cultured fibroblasts with low endogenous β-arrestins, PAR₂ activated AMPK; however, in primary fat and liver, PAR₂ only activated AMPK in β-arrestin-2^-/- mice. β-arrestin-2 could be co-immunoprecipitated with AMPK and CAMKKβ under baseline conditions from both cultured fibroblasts and primary fat, and its association with both proteins was increased by PAR₂ activation. Addition of recombinant β-arrestin-2 to in vitro kinase assays directly inhibited phosphorylation of AMPK by CAMKKβ on Thr172.

Conclusions

Studies have shown that decreased AMPK activity is associated with obesity and Type II Diabetes, while AMPK activity is increased with metabolically favorable conditions and cholesterol lowering drugs. These results suggest a role for β-arrestin in the inhibition of AMPK signaling, raising the possibility that β-arrestin-dependent PAR₂ signaling may act as a molecular switch turning a positive signal to AMPK into an inhibitory one.

GPCR signalling to the translation machinery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in most physiological processes, many of them being engaged in fully differentiated cells. These receptors couple to transducers of their own, primarily G proteins and beta-arrestins, which launch intracellular signalling cascades. Some of these signalling events regulate the translational machinery to fine-tune general cell metabolism or to alter protein expression pattern. Though extensively documented for tyrosine kinase receptors, translational regulation by GPCRs is still poorly appreciated. The objective of this review paper is to address the following questions: i) is there a "GPCR signature" impacting on the translational machinery, and ultimately on the type of mRNA translated? ii) are the regulatory networks involved similar as those utilized by tyrosine kinase receptors? In particular, we will discuss the specific features of translational control mediated by GPCRs and highlight the intrinsic properties of GPCRs these mechanisms could rely on.

Genetical genomic determinants of alcohol consumption in rats and humans

BACKGROUND

We have used a genetical genomic approach, in conjunction with phenotypic analysis of alcohol consumption, to identify candidate genes that predispose to varying levels of alcohol intake by HXB/BXH recombinant inbred rat strains. In addition, in two populations of humans, we assessed genetic polymorphisms associated with alcohol consumption using a custom genotyping array for 1,350 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Our goal was to ascertain whether our approach, which relies on statistical and informatics techniques, and non-human animal models of alcohol drinking behavior, could inform interpretation of genetic association studies with human populations.

RESULTS

In the HXB/BXH recombinant inbred (RI) rats, correlation analysis of brain gene expression levels with alcohol consumption in a two-bottle choice paradigm, and filtering based on behavioral and gene expression quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses, generated a list of candidate genes. A literature-based, functional analysis of the interactions of the products of these candidate genes defined pathways linked to presynaptic GABA release, activation of dopamine neurons, and postsynaptic GABA receptor trafficking, in brain regions including the hypothalamus, ventral tegmentum and amygdala. The analysis also implicated energy metabolism and caloric intake control as potential influences on alcohol consumption by the recombinant inbred rats. In the human populations, polymorphisms in genes associated with GABA synthesis and GABA receptors, as well as genes related to dopaminergic transmission, were associated with alcohol consumption.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the importance of the signaling pathways identified using the non-human animal models, rather than single gene products, in identifying factors responsible for complex traits such as alcohol consumption. The results suggest cross-species similarities in pathways that influence predisposition to consume alcohol by rats and humans. The importance of a well-defined phenotype is also illustrated. Our results also suggest that different genetic factors predispose alcohol dependence versus the phenotype of alcohol consumption.

Endosomes: a legitimate platform for the signaling train

Although long regarded as a conduit for the degradation or recycling of cell surface receptors, the endosomal system is also an essential site of signal transduction. Activated receptors accumulate in endosomes, and certain signaling components are exclusively localized to endosomes. Receptors can continue to transmit signals from endosomes that are different from those that arise from the plasma membrane, resulting in distinct physiological responses. Endosomal signaling is widespread in metazoans and plants, where it transmits signals for diverse receptor families that regulate essential processes including growth, differentiation and survival. Receptor signaling at endosomal membranes is tightly regulated by mechanisms that control agonist availability, receptor coupling to signaling machinery, and the subcellular localization of signaling components. Drugs that target mechanisms that initiate and terminate receptor signaling at the plasma membrane are widespread and effective treatments for disease. Selective disruption of receptor signaling in endosomes, which can be accomplished by targeting endosomal-specific signaling pathways or by selective delivery of drugs to the endosomal network, may provide novel therapies for disease.

Beta-arrestins and heterotrimeric G-proteins: collaborators and competitors in signal transduction

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as seven transmembrane receptors (7-TMRs), are the largest protein receptor superfamily in the body. These receptors and their ligands direct a diverse array of physiological responses, and hence have broad relevance to numerous diseases. As a result, they have generated considerable interest in the pharmaceutical industry as drug targets. Recently, GPCRs have been demonstrated to elicit signals through interaction with the scaffolding proteins, beta-arrestins-1 and 2, independent of heterotrimeric G-protein coupling. This review discusses several known G-protein-independent, beta-arrestin-dependent pathways and their potential physiological and pharmacological significance. The emergence of G-protein-independent signalling changes the way in which GPCR signalling is evaluated, from a cell biological to a pharmaceutical perspective and raises the possibility for the development of pathway specific therapeutics.