Mapping the binding site of thymosin beta4 on actin by competition with G-actin binding proteins indicates negative co-operativity between binding sites located on opposite subdomains of actin

Actin ADP-ribosylation at Threonine148 by Photorhabdus luminescens toxin TccC3 induces aggregation of intracellular F-actin

Intoxication of eukaryotic cells by Photorhabdus luminescens toxin TccC3 induces cell rounding and detachment from the substratum within a few hours and compromises a number of cell functions like phagocytosis. Here, we used morphological and biochemical procedures to analyse the mechanism of TccC3 intoxication. Life imaging of TccC3-intoxicated HeLa cells transfected with AcGFP-actin shows condensation of F-actin into large aggregates. Life cell total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy of identically treated HeLa cells confirmed the formation of actin aggregates but also disassembly of F-actin stress fibres. Recombinant TccC3 toxin ADP-ribosylates purified skeletal and non-muscle actin at threonine148 leading to a strong propensity to polymerize and F-actin bundle formation as shown by TIRF and electron microscopy. Native gel electrophoresis shows strongly reduced binding of Thr148-ADP-ribosylated actin to the severing proteins gelsolin and its fragments G1 and G1-3, and to ADF/cofilin. Complexation of actin with these proteins inhibits its ADP-ribosylation. TIRF microscopy demonstrates rapid polymerization of Thr148-ADP-ribosylated actin to curled F-actin bundles even in the presence of thymosin β4, gelsolin or G1-3. Thr148-ADP-ribosylated F-actin cannot be depolymerized by gelsolin or G1-3 as verified by TIRF, co-sedimentation and electron microscopy and shows reduced treadmilling as indicated by a lack of stimulation of its ATPase activity after addition of cofilin-1.

The beta-thymosins: intracellular and extracellular activities of a versatile actin binding protein family

The beta-thymosins are N-terminally acetylated peptides of about 5 kDa molecular mass and composed of about 40-44 amino acid residues. The first member of the family, thymosin beta4, was initially isolated from thymosin fraction 5, prepared in five steps from calf thymus. Thymosin beta4 was supposed to be specifically produced and released by the thymic gland and to possess hormonal activities modulating the immune response. Various paracrine effects have indeed been reported for these peptides such as cardiac protection, angiogenesis, stimulation of wound healing, and hair growth. Besides these paracrine effects, it was noted that beta-thymosins occur in high concentration in the cytoplasm of many eukaryotic cells and bind to the cytoskeletal component actin. Subsequently it became apparent from in vitro experiments that they preferentially bind to monomeric (G-)actin and stabilize it in its monomeric form. Due to this ability the beta-thymosins are the main intracellular actin sequestering factor, i.e., they posses the ability to remove monomeric actin from the dynamic assembly and disassembly processes of the actin cytoskeleton that constantly occur in activated cells. In this review we will concentrate on the intracellular activity and localization of the beta-thymosins, i.e., their modulating effect on the actin cytoskeleton.

Models of the Actin-Bound Forms of the beta-Thymosins

In recent years two structures have been reported that demonstrate how the two halves of a beta-thymosin repeat bind to actin monomers. Here we assess the validity of these structures and construct minimally biased models of the beta-thymosin:actin complexes. The models reveal that the beta-thymosins interact with actin throughout their length and that all the conserved residues are functional in this interface. These models are judged to be in excellent agreement with published biochemical and functional data. In particular, the models are consistent with the actin monomer sequestering and actin filament binding properties of beta-thymosins. The models also correctly predict competition between thymosin-beta4 with DNase I or profilin in binding actin while allowing ternary complexes at higher concentrations.

Inhibition of deoxyribonuclease I by actin is to protect cells from premature cell death

Deoxyribonuclease I (Dnase1) is the major extracellular endonuclease. It is secreted by digestive glands into the alimentary tract and into the plasma, lacrimal fluid and urine by hepatocytes, lacrimal glands and renal proximal tubular cells, respectively. In many species the activity of Dnase1 is inhibited by monomeric actin. However, the biological significance of this high affinity interaction is unknown. We generated a Dnase1 mutant with extremely reduced actin binding capacity. EGFP-constructs of wild-type and mutant Dnase1 were transfected into MCF-7 breast cancer cells and apoptosis or necrosis was induced by staurosporine or oxidative stress. During apoptosis faster chromatin fragmentation occurred in cells transfected with mutant Dnase1. When wt (wild-type)- or mutated Dnase1 were added to cells after induction of necrosis, faster chromatin degradation occurred in the presence of mutant Dnase1. Inclusion of actin under these conditions inhibited chromatin degradation by wt- but not by mutated Dnase1. Thus, inhibition of Dnase1 by actin may serve as a self-protection mechanism against premature DNA degradation during cell damage.

Mapping the ADF/cofilin binding site on monomeric actin by competitive cross-linking and peptide array: evidence for a second binding site on monomeric actin

The binding sites for actin depolymerising factor (ADF) and cofilin on G-actin have been mapped by competitive chemical cross-linking using deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), gelsolin segment 1 (G1), thymosin beta4 (Tbeta4), and vitamin D-binding protein (DbP). To reduce ADF/cofilin induced actin oligomerisation we used ADP-ribosylated actin. Both vitamin D-binding protein and thymosin beta4 inhibit binding by ADF or cofilin, while cofilin or ADF and DNase I bind simultaneously. Competition was observed between ADF or cofilin and G1, supporting the hypothesis that cofilin preferentially binds in the cleft between sub-domains 1 and 3, similar to or overlapping the binding site of G1. Because the affinity of G1 is much higher than that of ADF or cofilin, even at a 20-fold excess of the latter, the complexes contained predominantly G1. Nevertheless, cross-linking studies using actin:G1 complexes and ADF or cofilin showed the presence of low concentrations of ternary complexes containing both ADF or cofilin and G1. Thus, even with monomeric actin, it is shown for the first time that binding sites for both G1 and ADF or cofilin can be occupied simultaneously, confirming the existence of two separate binding sites. Employing a peptide array with overlapping sequences of actin overlaid by cofilin, we have identified five sequence stretches of actin able to bind cofilin. These sequences are located within the regions of F-actin predicted to bind cofilin in the model derived from image reconstructions of electron microscopical images of cofilin-decorated filaments. Three of the peptides map to the cleft region between sub-domains 1 and 3 of the upper actin along the two-start long-pitch helix, while the other two are in the DNase I loop corresponding to the site of the lower actin in the helix. In the absence of any crystal structures of ADF or cofilin in complex with actin, these studies provide further information about the binding sites on F-actin for these important actin regulatory proteins.

Actin Cytoskeleton Organization and Posttranscriptional Regulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase During Cell Growth

Posttranscriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression is an important mechanism by which endothelial cells respond to various physiological and pathophysiological stimuli. Previously, we showed that eNOS expression was dramatically altered by the state of cell growth and that the mechanism responsible for this regulation was entirely posttranscriptional, occurring via changes in eNOS mRNA stability. The present study identifies a role for actin cytoskeleton organization in the posttranscriptional regulation of eNOS during cell growth and examines the relationship between the state of actin polymerization and eNOS expression. We identified monomeric actin (globular [G]-actin) as the major component of a 51-kDa ribonucleoprotein that binds to the eNOS mRNA 3' untranslated region in UV-crosslinking analysis. Binding activity of the ribonucleoprotein complex correlated with the relative concentration of G-actin versus filamentous actin (F-actin). ENOS transcripts colocalized with cytoplasmic G-actin in cells subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization and G-actin fluorescence staining. In subcellular fractionation studies, eNOS transcripts were enriched in the free polysomal fraction of nonproliferating cells and enriched in the cell matrix-associated polysomal fraction of proliferating cells. Furthermore, an inverse relationship between the concentration of G-actin and eNOS expression was observed in endothelial cells subjected to pharmacological alteration of their cytoskeleton; lower G/F-actin ratios correlated with increased eNOS expression. Our findings provide some insight into how endothelial cells may use the dynamic organization of the actin cytoskeleton to regulate expression of an enzyme that is crucial to vascular homeostasis.

Structural basis of actin sequestration by thymosin-beta4: implications for WH2 proteins

The WH2 (Wiscott-Aldridge syndrome protein homology domain 2) repeat is an actin interacting motif found in monomer sequestering and filament assembly proteins. We have stabilized the prototypical WH2 family member, thymosin-beta4 (Tbeta4), with respect to actin, by creating a hybrid between gelsolin domain 1 and the C-terminal half of Tbeta4 (G1-Tbeta4). This hybrid protein sequesters actin monomers, severs actin filaments and acts as a leaky barbed end cap. Here, we present the structure of the G1-Tbeta4:actin complex at 2 A resolution. The structure reveals that Tbeta4 sequesters by capping both ends of the actin monomer, and that exchange of actin between Tbeta4 and profilin is mediated by a minor overlap in binding sites. The structure implies that multiple WH2 motif-containing proteins will associate longitudinally with actin filaments. Finally, we discuss the role of the WH2 motif in arp2/3 activation.

Actin binding proteins: regulation of cytoskeletal microfilaments

The actin cytoskeleton is a complex structure that performs a wide range of cellular functions. In 2001, significant advances were made to our understanding of the structure and function of actin monomers. Many of these are likely to help us understand and distinguish between the structural models of actin microfilaments. In particular, 1) the structure of actin was resolved from crystals in the absence of cocrystallized actin binding proteins (ABPs), 2) the prokaryotic ancestral gene of actin was crystallized and its function as a bacterial cytoskeleton was revealed, and 3) the structure of the Arp2/3 complex was described for the first time. In this review we selected several ABPs (ADF/cofilin, profilin, gelsolin, thymosin beta4, DNase I, CapZ, tropomodulin, and Arp2/3) that regulate actin-driven assembly, i.e., movement that is independent of motor proteins. They were chosen because 1) they represent a family of related proteins, 2) they are widely distributed in nature, 3) an atomic structure (or at least a plausible model) is available for each of them, and 4) each is expressed in significant quantities in cells. These ABPs perform the following cellular functions: 1) they maintain the population of unassembled but assembly-ready actin monomers (profilin), 2) they regulate the state of polymerization of filaments (ADF/cofilin, profilin), 3) they bind to and block the growing ends of actin filaments (gelsolin), 4) they nucleate actin assembly (gelsolin, Arp2/3, cofilin), 5) they sever actin filaments (gelsolin, ADF/cofilin), 6) they bind to the sides of actin filaments (gelsolin, Arp2/3), and 7) they cross-link actin filaments (Arp2/3). Some of these ABPs are essential, whereas others may form regulatory ternary complexes. Some play crucial roles in human disorders, and for all of them, there are good reasons why investigations into their structures and functions should continue.

Interaction of myosin subfragment 1 with forms of monomeric actin

The ability of myosin subfragment 1 to interact with monomeric actin complexed to sequestering proteins was tested by a number of different techniques such as affinity absorption, chemical cross-linking, fluorescence titration, and competition procedures. For affinity absorption, actin was attached to agarose immobilized DNase I. Both chymotryptic subfragment 1 isoforms (S1A1 and S1A2) were retained by this affinity matrix. Fluorescence titration employing pyrenyl-actin in complex with deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) or thymosin beta4 demonstrated S1 binding to these actin complexes. A K(D) of 5 x 10(-8) M for S1A1 binding to the actin-DNase I complex was determined. Fluorescence titration did not indicate binding of S1 to actin in complex with gelsolin segment 1 (G1) or vitamin D-binding protein (DBP). However, fluorescence competition experiments and analysis of tryptic cleavage patterns of S1 indicated its interaction with actin in complex with DBP or G1. Formation of the ternary DNase I-acto-S1 complex was directly demonstrated by sucrose density sedimentation. S1 binding to G-actin was found to be sensitive to ATP and an increase in ionic strength. Actin fixed in its monomeric state by DNase I was unable to significantly stimulate the Mg2+-dependent S1-ATPase activity. Both wild-type and a mutant of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin II subfragment 1 containing 12 additional lysine residues within an insertion of 20 residues into loop 2 (K12/20-Q532E) were found to also interact with actin-DNase I complex. Binding of the K12/20-Q532E mutant to the actin-DNase I complex occurred with higher affinity than wild-type S1 and was less sensitive to mono- and divalent cations.

The distribution of cofilin and DNase I in vivo

Actin is the principal component of the cytoskeleton, a structure that can be disassembled and reassembled in a matter of seconds in vivo. The state of assembly of actin in vivo is primarily regulated by one or more actin binding proteins (ABPs). Typically, the actions of ABPs have been studied one by one, however, we propose that multiple ABPs, acting cooperatively, may be involved in the control of actin filament length. Cofilin and DNase I are two ABPs that have previously been demonstrated to form a ternary complex with actin in vitro. This is the first report to demonstrate their co-localisation in vivo, and differences in their distributions. Our observations strongly suggest a physiological role for higher order complexes of actin in regulation of cytoskeletal assembly during processes such as cell division.

Cofilin and DNase I affect the conformation of the small domain of actin

Cofilin binding induces an allosteric conformational change in subdomain 2 of actin, reducing the distance between probes attached to Gln-41 (subdomain 2) and Cys-374 (subdomain 1) from 34.4 to 31.4 A (pH 6.8) as demonstrated by fluorescence energy transfer spectroscopy. This effect was slightly less pronounced at pH 8.0. In contrast, binding of DNase I increased this distance (35.5 A), a change that was not pH-sensitive. Although DNase I-induced changes in the distance along the small domain of actin were modest, a significantly larger change (38.2 A) was observed when the ternary complex of cofilin-actin-DNase I was formed. Saturation binding of cofilin prevents pyrene fluorescence enhancement normally associated with actin polymerization. Changes in the emission and excitation spectra of pyrene-F actin in the presence of cofilin indicate that subdomain 1 (near Cys-374) assumes a G-like conformation. Thus, the enhancement of pyrene fluorescence does not correspond to the extent of actin polymerization in the presence of cofilin. The structural changes in G and F actin induced by these actin-binding proteins may be important for understanding the mechanism regulating the G-actin pool in cells.

Polymerisation of chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex to filamentous actin: alteration in helical parameters and visualisation of thymosin beta(4) binding on F-actin

The beta-thymosins are intracellular monomeric (G-)actin sequestering proteins forming 1:1 complexes with G-actin. Here, we analysed the interaction of thymosin beta(4) with F-actin. Thymosin beta(4) at 200 microM was chemically cross-linked to F-actin. In the presence of phalloidin, the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex was incorporated into F-actin. These mixed filaments were of normal appearance when inspected by conventional transmission electron microscopy after negative staining. We purified the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex, which polymerised only when phalloidin and the gelsolin:2-actin complex were present simultaneously. Using scanning transmission electron microscopy, the mass-per-length of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments was found to be 16.0(+/-0.8) kDa/nm and 18.0(+/-0.9) kDa/nm, respectively, indicating an increase in subunit mass of 5.4 kDa. Analysis of the helical parameters revealed an increase of the crossover spacing of the two right-handed long-pitch helical strands from 36.0 to 40.5 nm. Difference map analysis of 3-D helical reconstruction of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments yielded an elongated extra mass. Qualitatively, the overall size and shape of the difference mass were compatible with published data of the atomic structure of thymosin beta(4). The deduced binding sites of thymosin beta(4) to actin were in agreement with those identified previously. However, parts of the difference map might represent subtle conformational changes of both proteins occurring upon complex formation.

ATPase activity and conformational changes in the regulation of actin

The eukaryotic microfilament system is regulated in part through the nucleotide- and cation-dependent conformation of the actin molecule. In this review, recent literature on the crystal and solution structures of actin and other actin-superfamily proteins is summarized. Furthermore, the structure of the nucleotide binding cleft is discussed in terms of the mechanism of ATP hydrolysis and P(i) release. Two distinct domain movements are suggested to participate in the regulation of actin. (1) High-affinity binding of Mg(2+) to actin induces a rearrangement of side chains in the nucleotide binding site leading to an increased ATPase activity and polymerizability, as well as a rotation of subdomain 2 which is mediated by the hydroxyl of serine-14. (2) Hydrolysis of ATP and subsequent release of inorganic phosphate lead to a butterfly-like opening of the actin molecule brought about by a shearing in the interdomain helix 135-150. These domain rearrangements modulate the interaction of actin with a variety of different proteins, and conversely, protein binding to actin can restrict these conformational changes, with ultimate effects on the assembly state of the microfilament system.

Mutational screen identifies critical amino acid residues of beta-actin mediating interaction between its folding intermediates and eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin CCT

The three-dimensional reconstruction of apo-CCT-alpha-actin by cryoelectron microscopy shows that actin binds either the CCTbeta-CCTdelta or the CCTepsilon-CCTdelta subunit pairs of the chaperonin in an open and apparently quasi-native conformation. The CCT-binding sites are seen located at the tips of the two arms of actin and these same regions of actin have been implicated in CCT binding through beta-actin peptide-array screening. Three main CCT binding regions exist: actin Sites I, II, and III, which are composed of loops that are surface-exposed in native actin. Sixty-eight amino acid residues on beta-actin have been screened by mutagenesis for effects on CCT interaction in quantitative in vitro translation assays in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Actin seems to be folding cooperatively on chaperonin, since certain mutants discriminate CCT binding from processing. Actin Site II, located at the tip of actin subdomain 4, is the major determinant for CCT binding. Site II is composed of two anti-parallel extended beta-strands, with F200-T203 and D244 contributing substantially to the binding site. The substrate recognition chemistry of CCT thus seems different from that of Group I chaperonins and probably reflects the fact that it needs to be highly specific to enable capture and folding of the actins and tubulins.

beta-Thymosins, small acidic peptides with multiple functions

The beta-thymosins are a family of highly conserved polar 5 kDa peptides originally thought to be thymic hormones. About 10 years ago, thymosin beta(4) as well as other members of this ubiquitous peptide family were identified as the main intracellular G-actin sequestering peptides, being present in high concentrations in almost every cell. beta-Thymosins bind monomeric actin in a 1:1 complex and act as actin buffers, preventing polymerization into actin filaments but supplying a pool of actin monomers when the cell needs filaments. Changes in the expression of beta-thymosins appear to be related to the differentiation of cells. Increased expression of beta-thymosins or even the synthesis of a beta-thymosin normally not expressed might promote metastasis possibly by increasing mobility of the cells. Thymosin beta(4) is detected outside of cells in blood plasma or in wound fluid. Several biological effects are attributed to thymosin beta(4), oxidized thymosin beta(4), or to the fragment, acSDKP, possibly generated from thymosin beta(4). Among the effects are induction of metallo-proteinases, chemotaxis, angiogenesis and inhibition of inflammation as well as the inhibition of bone marrow stem cell proliferation. However, nothing is known about the molecular mechanisms mediating the effects attributed to extracellular beta-thymosins.

Early and progressive accumulation of reactive microglia in the Huntington disease brain

Microglia may contribute to cell death in neurodegenerative diseases. We studied the activation of microglia in affected regions of Huntington disease (HD) brain by localizing thymosin beta-4 (Tbeta4), which is increased in reactive microglia. Activated microglia appeared in the neostriatum, cortex, and globus pallidus and the adjoining white matter of the HD brain, but not in control brain. In the striatum and cortex, reactive microglia occurred in all grades of pathology, accumulated with increasing grade, and grew in density in relation to degree of neuronal loss. The predominant morphology of activated microglia differed in the striatum and cortex. Processes of reactive microglia were conspicuous in low-grade HD, suggesting an early microglia response to changes in neuropil and axons and in the grade 2 and grade 3 cortex, were aligned with the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Some reactive microglia contacted pyramidal neurons with huntingtin-positive nuclear inclusions. The early and proximate association of activated microglia with degenerating neurons in the HD brain implicates a role for activated microglia in HD pathogenesis.

Actin-latrunculin A structure and function. Differential modulation of actin-binding protein function by latrunculin A

Latrunculin A is used extensively as an agent to sequester monomeric actin in living cells. We hypothesize that additional activities of latrunculin A may be important for its biological activity. Our data are consistent with the formation of a 1:1 stoichiometric complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 0.2 to 0.4 micrometer and provide no evidence that the actin-latrunculin A complex participates in the elongation of actin filaments. Profilin and latrunculin A bind independently to actin, whereas binding of thymosin beta(4) to actin is inhibited by latrunculin A. Potential implications of this differential effect on actin-binding proteins are discussed. From a structural perspective, if latrunculin A binds to actin at a site that sterically influences binding by thymosin beta(4), then the observation that latrunculin A inhibits nucleotide exchange on actin implies an allosteric effect on the nucleotide binding cleft. Alternatively, if, as previously postulated, latrunculin A binds in the nucleotide cleft of actin, then its ability to inhibit binding by thymosin beta(4) is a surprising result that suggests that significant allosteric changes affect the thymosin beta(4) binding site. We show that latrunculin A and actin form a crystalline structure with orthorhombic space group P2(1)2(1)2(1) and diffraction to 3.10 A. A high resolution structure with optimized crystallization conditions should provide insight regarding these remarkable allosteric properties.

Thymosin-beta(4) changes the conformation and dynamics of actin monomers

Thymosin-beta(4) (Tbeta(4)) binds actin monomers stoichiometrically and maintains the bulk of the actin monomer pool in metazoan cells. Tbeta(4) binding quenches the fluorescence of N-iodoacetyl-N'-(5-sulfo-1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine (AEDANS) conjugated to Cys(374) of actin monomers. The K(d) of the actin-Tbeta(4) complex depends on the cation and nucleotide bound to actin but is not affected by the AEDANS probe. The different stabilities are determined primarily by the rates of dissociation. At 25 degrees C, the free energy of Tbeta(4) binding MgATP-actin is primarily enthalpic in origin but entropic for CaATP-actin. Binding is coupled to the dissociation of bound water molecules, which is greater for CaATP-actin than MgATP-actin monomers. Proteolysis of MgATP-actin, but not CaATP-actin, at Gly(46) on subdomain 2 is >12 times faster when Tbeta(4) is bound. The C terminus of Tbeta(4) contacts actin near this cleavage site, at His(40). By tritium exchange, Tbeta(4) slows the exchange rate of approximately eight rapidly exchanging amide protons on actin. We conclude that Tbeta(4) changes the conformation and structural dynamics ("breathing") of actin monomers. The conformational change may reflect the unique ability of Tbeta(4) to sequester actin monomers and inhibit nucleotide exchange.

Thymosin beta(4) serves as a glutaminyl substrate of transglutaminase. Labeling with fluorescent dansylcadaverine does not abolish interaction with G-actin

Thymosin beta(4) possesses actin-sequestering activity and, like transglutaminases, is supposed to be involved in cellular events like angiogenesis, blood coagulation, apoptosis and wound healing. Thymosin beta(4) serves as a specific glutaminyl substrate for transglutaminase and can be fluorescently labeled with dansylcadaverine. Two (Gln-23 and Gln-36) of the three glutamine residues were mainly involved in the transglutaminase reaction, while the third glutaminyl residue (Gln-39) was derivatized with a low efficiency. Labeled derivatives were able to inhibit polymerization of G-actin and could be cross-linked to G-actin by 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. Fluorescently labeled thymosin beta(4) may serve as a useful tool for further investigations in cell biology. Thymosin beta(4) could provide a specific glutaminyl substrate for transglutaminase in vivo, because of the fast reaction observed in vitro occurring at thymosin beta(4) concentrations which are found inside cells. Taking these data together, it is tempting to speculate that thymosin beta(4) may serve as a glutaminyl substrate for transglutaminases in vivo and play an important role in transglutaminase-related processes.

Plant profilin induces actin polymerization from actin : beta-thymosin complexes and competes directly with beta-thymosins and with negative co-operativity with DNase I for binding to actin

Recombinant plant (birch) profilin was analyzed for its ability to promote actin polymerization from the actin:thymosin beta4 and beta9 complex. Depending on the nature of the divalent cation, recombinant plant (birch) profilin exhibited two different modes of interaction with actin, like mammalian profilin. In the presence of magnesium ions birch profilin promoted the polymerization of actin from A:Tbeta4. In contrast, in the presence of calcium but absence of magnesium ions birch profilin was unable to initiate the polymerization of actin from the complex with Tbeta4. However, under these conditions profilin formed a stable stoichiometric complex with skeletal muscle alpha-actin, as verified by its ability to increase the critical concentration of actin polymerization. Chemical cross-linking indicated that birch profilin competes with Tbeta4 for actin binding. Ternary complex formation of birch profilin with actin:DNase I complex was suggested by chemical cross-linking. However, the determination of the critical concentrations of actin polymerization in the simultaneous presence of birch profilin and DNase I indicated that profilin and DNase I did not form a ternary complex. These data indicated a negative co-operativity between the profilin and DNase I binding sites on actin.