1
|
Sønsterud H, Costain K, Ward D. Multidimensional Individualized Stuttering Therapy Outcomes At 24 Months Post Clinic: An Embodiment and Awareness Perspective. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2025; 34:32-43. [PMID: 39475631 DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multidimensional Individualized Stuttering Therapy (MIST) is based on proactive collaborative work and shared decision making between client and clinician with the goal of identifying individual case-appropriate procedures and therapy elements in a manner that is meaningful and context-sensitive for each person. MIST combines value- and awareness-based elements from acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with stuttering and speech modification interventions. In keeping with the principles of ACT, we locate mindfulness as part of an embodied practice facilitated through a collaboration between the person who stutters and the speech-language therapist. METHOD The aim of this study was to see whether the positive results of MIST recorded at 12 months post-therapy remained stable at 24 months post-therapy and to consider the role of embodiment and awareness within MIST. Fifteen of 18 adults already enrolled in a treatment study (2015/FO12451) took part in a single-group repeated-measures design. They completed measures of stuttering severity, impact of stuttering, unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about stuttering, general anxiety symptoms, and fear of negative evaluation. RESULTS There was a significant reduction of stuttering severity and negative impact of stuttering from pre-therapy to 24 months post-therapy. Unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about stuttering, symptoms of general anxiety, and fear of negative evaluation were reduced at 12 months post-therapy, and these values remained stable at 24 months post-therapy. CONCLUSIONS MIST was associated with positive outcomes at 24 months post-therapy, suggesting a possible connection between the person-centered approach and longer-term benefit. Findings are discussed within the context of mindfulness and embodied adjustment, and shared client-clinician decision making. The absence of a control group is a limiting factor regarding certainty of interpretation. Future research is therefore needed on collaborative and individualized approaches to stuttering therapy that include embodiment and awareness perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Sønsterud
- Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
- Statped, National Service for Special Needs Education, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kirsten Costain
- Statped, National Service for Special Needs Education, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Ward
- School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Namasivayam AK, Cheung K, Atputhajeyam B, Petrosov J, Branham M, Grover V, van Lieshout P. Effectiveness of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Comorbidities When Delivered in a Dyadic and Group Format. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024; 33:2904-2920. [PMID: 39353057 DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current study is a Phase I clinical study with the goal of determining feasibility and the effectiveness of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol (K-SLP) for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and comorbidities. We hypothesized that K-SLP intervention would result in improved outcomes and maintenance of treatment effect at 3-4 months postintervention. METHOD Single-subject experimental design with multiple baselines across behaviors was replicated across a group of six children. Five out of six participants completed the study. The K-SLP intervention was administered in dyads four times a week for three consecutive weeks. Outcomes included assessment of word/syllable shapes, articulation accuracy, speech intelligibility, and functional communication. Treatment progress was measured through: (a) the administration of custom probe word lists and (b) assessments carried out at pretreatment, immediately following intervention and approximately 3-4 months after the study period. RESULTS Four out of five participants demonstrated significant improvements to words targeted in treatment and three out of five generalized these to untreated words. Furthermore, three out of five participants showed immediate and clinically significant posttreatment improvements in speech intelligibility and functional outcomes, and this increased to four out of five participants at 3-4 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of the K-SLP program when delivered in dyads to children with CAS with comorbidities. The study replicates earlier findings and reaffirms the positive outcomes of K-SLP for children with CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aravind K Namasivayam
- Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Speech Research Centre Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karina Cheung
- Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Speech Research Centre Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bavika Atputhajeyam
- Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Speech Research Centre Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Petrosov
- Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Speech Research Centre Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Pascal van Lieshout
- Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerrigan JS, Brundage SB. Lived experiences of children who stutter in their own voices. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 112:106468. [PMID: 39298865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant research has explored the lived experiences of adults who stutter, but less research exists regarding the lived experiences of children who stutter. The opinions and ideas of children who stutter may differ from those of adults, making it important for clinicians and researchers to obtain information directly from children who stutter. Asking children directly can lead to treatment outcomes and research questions that better align with the children's needs and values. METHOD Interviews with 18 children who stutter (9 girls/9 boys) ages 8-17 were sourced from the Voices of Children Who Stutter database located at Talkbank.org. Interview questions asked the children about living with a stutter, participating in stuttering support organizations (SSOs), and their perspectives on treatment. Qualitative, phenomenological analysis was performed on their answers following standardized qualitative procedures. RESULTS Analysis of 910 total utterances yielded 7 themes and 9 subthemes. Themes indicated that the children: (a) had significant knowledge regarding their own stuttering, (b) had opinions regarding what constituted worthwhile treatment outcomes, (c) were clear about desirable clinician characteristics for working with kids who stutter, and (d) saw the benefits of being part of a community. CONCLUSIONS Themes revealed that overall, children who stutter exhibit deep understanding regarding their experiences with stuttering, which clinicians can harness in person-centered goal setting. Additionally, the participants express the importance of participating in stuttering support organizations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Grégoire S, Beaulieu F, Lachance L, Bouffard T, Vezeau C, Perreault M. An online peer support program to improve mental health among university students: A randomized controlled trial. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2024; 72:2001-2013. [PMID: 35943903 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2099224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent calls for more peer support initiatives aimed at promoting mental health in postsecondary institutions, those initiatives remain scarce. In this study, a multisite randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the effect of an online peer support intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy using mental health and school indicators. Undergraduate students were recruited in three Canadian universities and randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 54) or a wait-list control group (n = 53). Compared to control participants, those who took part in the program self-reported reduced psychological inflexibility, stress, anxiety and depression, and increased psychological flexibility and well-being. The intervention had no effect on academic satisfaction and engagement. These results were found both in completer and intent-to-treat samples. The findings provide evidence that peer support may be a beneficial adjunct to mental health interventions offered to college and university students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Grégoire
- Département d'éducation et pédagogie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Frédérique Beaulieu
- Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Lise Lachance
- Département d'éducation et pédagogie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Thérèse Bouffard
- Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Carole Vezeau
- Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de psychologie, Cégep régional de Lanaudière à Joliette, Joliette, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michel Perreault
- Département de psychiatrie, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ishikawa K, Anand S. Tracking age-related changes in voice and speech production with Landmark-based analysis of speech. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2024; 156:1221-1230. [PMID: 39162416 DOI: 10.1121/10.0028175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Voice and speech production change with age, which can lead to potential communication challenges. This study explored the use of Landmark-based analysis of speech (LMBAS), a knowledge-based speech analysis algorithm based on Stevens' Landmark Theory, to describe age-related changes in adult speakers. The speech samples analyzed were sourced from the University of Florida Aging Voice Database, which included recordings of 16 sentences from the Speech Perception in Noise test of Bilger, Rzcezkowski, Nuetzel, and Rabinowitz [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, S98-S98 (1979)] and Bilger, Nuetzel, Rabinowitz, and Rzeczkowski [J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 27, 32-84 (1984)]. These sentences were read in quiet environments by 50 young, 50 middle-aged, and 50 older American English speakers, with an equal distribution of sexes. Acoustic landmarks, specifically, glottal, bursts, and syllabicity landmarks, were extracted using SpeechMark®, MATLAB Toolbox version 1.1.2. The results showed significant age effect on glottal and burst landmarks. Furthermore, the sex effect was significant for burst and syllabicity landmarks. While the results of LMBAS suggest its potential in detecting age-related changes in speech, increase in syllabicity landmarks with age was unexpected. This finding may suggest the need for further refinement and adjustment of this analytical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiko Ishikawa
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky, 900 South Limestone, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0200, USA
| | - Supraja Anand
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, 4202 Fowler Ave, PCD 1017, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baylor C, Bamer A, Brown C, Jin JL, Teixeira J, Nuara M. The Communicative Participation Item Bank-Gender-Diverse Version: Item Bank Calibration and Short Form. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024; 33:952-968. [PMID: 38232175 DOI: 10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to calibrate an item set for a new version of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) specifically for use with gender-diverse clients. This new version contains a new item stem as well as other minor wording changes from the original CPIB in order to be acceptable to gender-diverse respondents. METHOD Survey data on 47 candidate items were collected from 434 transgender individuals: 219 assigned female at birth (AFAB) and 215 assigned male at birth (AMAB). Item response theory analyses included evaluation of unidimensionality, local dependence, fit to a graded response model, and differential item functioning (DIF) between AFAB and AMAB respondents. RESULTS The original set of 47 items was unidimensional, but 16 items were removed due to local dependence, resulting in a final item bank of 31 items. There was no evidence of DIF between AFAB and AMAB participants. Reliability of the full item bank is good (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 20 and 76 and high (i.e., > 0.9) between T scores of 20 and 68. The short form had good reliability (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 24 and 64. CONCLUSIONS The Communicative Participation Item Bank-Gender-Diverse (CPIB-GD) version provides a new option for person-reported outcome measurement with gender-diverse clients. Clinicians are cautioned to use only the new CPIB-GD with gender-diverse clients, and not the original CPIB due to unacceptable wording in the original version for this population. The original CPIB remains valid and appropriate for the populations for which it was developed. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24993309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alyssa Bamer
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Cait Brown
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jingyu Linna Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jeffrey Teixeira
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Otolaryngology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael Nuara
- Department of Otolaryngology, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neel A, Krasilshchikova S, Richardson JD, Arenas R, Bennett L, Banks S, Ritter A, Bernick C. Articulation Rate, Pauses, and Disfluencies in Professional Fighters: Potential Speech Biomarkers for Repetitive Head Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:458-466. [PMID: 36701308 PMCID: PMC10368786 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As part of a larger study dedicated to identifying speech and language biomarkers of neurological decline associated with repetitive head injury (RHI) in professional boxers and mixed martial artists (MMAs), we examined articulation rate, pausing, and disfluency in passages read aloud by participants in the Professional Athletes Brain Health Study. SETTING A large outpatient medical center specializing in neurological care. PARTICIPANTS, DESIGN, AND MAIN MEASURES Passages read aloud by 60 boxers, 40 MMAs, and 55 controls were acoustically analyzed to determine articulation rate (the number of syllables produced per second), number and duration of pauses, and number and duration of disfluencies in this observational study. RESULTS Both boxers and MMAs differed from controls in articulation rate, producing syllables at a slower rate than controls by nearly half a syllable per second on average. Boxers produced significantly more pauses and disfluencies in passages read aloud than MMAs and controls. CONCLUSIONS Slower articulation rate in both boxers and MMA fighters compared with individuals with no history of RHI and the increased occurrence of pauses and disfluencies in the speech of boxers suggest changes in speech motor behavior that may relate to RHI. These speech characteristics can be measured in everyday speaking conditions and by automatic recognition systems, so they have the potential to serve as effective, noninvasive clinical indicators for RHI-associated neurological decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Neel
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (Drs Neel, Richardson, and Arenas and Ms Krasilshchikova); Pickup Family Neurosciences Institute, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, California (Dr Bennett); Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (Dr Banks); and Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, Nevada (Drs Ritter and Bernick)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Teixeira J, Jin JL, Baylor C, Nuara M. Modifying the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for individuals receiving gender-affirming communication care: Stakeholder feedback from cognitive interviews. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 102:106312. [PMID: 36791644 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) is a person-reported outcome measure designed for adults with communication disorders. The CPIB has not been validated for use with clients seeking gender-affirming communication care. The purpose of this study was to determine modifications needed to the CPIB for it to be appropriate for transgender respondents. METHODS Individual qualitative cognitive interviews were conducted with 14 transgender adults (seven assigned male at birth, six assigned female at birth, one intersex / assigned female at birth). As participants completed the CPIB, they were asked to 'think out loud' to share their reactions to the items, reasons for their item responses, and any recommendations for changing the CPIB. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify common and salient trends in participants' feedback. RESULTS The most salient change participants required was in the CPIB item stem. The original stem ("Does your condition interfere with….") is inappropriate for transgender clients because referring to being transgender as a 'condition' is unacceptable. A new stem ("How difficult is it for you to ….") was acceptable to participants. The original CPIB uses the phrase 'family and friends' to refer to safe and comfortable communication partners. Participants in this study reported that this does not reflect the experiences of many transgender people who are not accepted by their biological families. The recommended alternate wording is "people who know you well." The items reflected situations that were relevant to participants, and wording was acceptable with few exceptions. Participants suggested they would have responded to the CPIB items differently earlier in their transition, with their scores improving over time. CONCLUSIONS The original CPIB questionnaire should not be used with transgender clients due to unacceptable wording. The modified items generated from this study require psychometric calibration for a new CPIB version for clients seeking gender-affirming communication care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Teixeira
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
| | - Jingyu Linna Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 356490, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - Carolyn Baylor
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
| | - Michael Nuara
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Borders JC, Grande AA, Troche MS. Statistical Power and Swallowing Rehabilitation Research: Current Landscape and Next Steps. Dysphagia 2022; 37:1673-1688. [PMID: 35226185 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-022-10428-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite rapid growth in the number of treatments to rehabilitate dysphagia, studies often demonstrate mixed results with non-significant changes to functional outcomes. Given that power analyses are infrequently reported in dysphagia research, it remains unclear whether studies are adequately powered to detect a range of treatment effects. Therefore, this review sought to examine the current landscape of statistical power in swallowing rehabilitation research. Databases were searched for swallowing treatments using instrumental evaluations of swallowing and the penetration-aspiration scale as an outcome. Sensitivity power analyses based on each study's statistical test and sample size were performed to determine the minimum effect size detectable with 80% power. Eighty-nine studies with 94 treatment comparisons were included. Sixty-seven percent of treatment comparisons were unable to detect effects smaller than d = 0.80. The smallest detectable effect size was d = 0.29 for electrical stimulation, d = 0.49 for postural maneuvers, d = 0.52 for non-invasive brain stimulation, d = 0.61 for combined treatments, d = 0.63 for respiratory-based interventions, d = 0.70 for lingual strengthening, and d = 0.79 for oral sensory stimulation. Dysphagia treatments examining changes in penetration-aspiration scale scores were generally powered to reliably detect larger effect sizes and not smaller (but potentially clinically meaningful) effects. These findings suggest that non-significant results may be related to low statistical power, highlighting the need for collaborative, well-powered intervention studies that can detect smaller, clinically meaningful changes in swallowing function. To facilitate implementation, a tutorial on simulation-based power analyses for ordinal outcomes is provided ( https://osf.io/e6usd/ ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Borders
- Laboratory for the Study of Upper Airway Dysfunction, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Michelle S Troche
- Laboratory for the Study of Upper Airway Dysfunction, Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wallace SE, Patterson J, Purdy M, Knollman-Porter K, Coppens P. Auditory Comprehension Interventions for People With Aphasia: A Scoping Review. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:2404-2420. [PMID: 36252946 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-21-00297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review examined studies reporting restorative treatments designed to improve auditory comprehension in people with aphasia. METHOD We searched eight databases using keywords aphasia, auditory comprehension, treatment, intervention, and rehabilitation, for studies published between 1970 and 2020. Searches returned 170 records, and after applying exclusionary criteria, 28 articles remained. For each article, two authors independently extracted data on study design parameters, participant characteristics, treatment protocol, and treatment outcomes, including generalization. RESULTS Studies were categorized by treatment focus: direct auditory (n = 7), mixed auditory (n = 13), or indirect (n = 8). Study designs were group (n = 12), single-subject experimental design (n = 11), or case study (n = 5). Fifteen studies had a control condition and/or a control group. Thirteen studies included two to 10 participants. Aphasia severity and auditory comprehension severity were infrequently reported, and most participants were greater than 1-year poststroke. Treatment targets and tasks varied. Sessions ranged from 8 to 240 min, once or more per week, for eight to 60 total sessions over 2-20 weeks. Impairment-based outcome measures were typically used. Improvement and generalization were regularly reported; however, authors frequently did not report statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS A variety of treatments have addressed auditory comprehension deficits in people with aphasia, with many reporting improvements in auditory comprehension for some people. However, the variability in treatment tasks and delivery and outcome measurements preclude confidently offering specific clinical recommendations for implementing auditory comprehension treatments. Gaps identified by the current study may guide the development and exploration of transparent, repeatable, patient-centered treatments. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21291345.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Wallace
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Janet Patterson
- Research Service, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez
| | - Mary Purdy
- Department of Communication Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven
| | | | - Patrick Coppens
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, State University of New York College at Plattsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boliek CA, Halpern A, Hernandez K, Fox CM, Ramig L. Intensive Voice Treatment (Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT LOUD]) for Children With Down Syndrome: Phase I Outcomes. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2022; 65:1228-1262. [PMID: 35230877 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the effects of an intensive voice treatment Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD) on children with Down syndrome (DS) and motor speech disorders. METHOD A Phase I, multiple baseline, single-subject design with replication across nine participants with DS was used. Single-word intelligibility, acoustic measures of vocal functioning, and parent perceptions of pre- and posttreatment communication function were used as treatment outcome measures. RESULTS All participants completed the full dose of LSVT LOUD and showed gains on one or more of the outcome measures. Patterns of posttreatment improvements were not consistent across participants but were more frequently observed on trained maximum performance tasks compared to tasks reflecting generalization of the treatment skillset. Some participants exhibited a stronger response to treatment, whereas others showed a mixed or weaker response. Parents liked the treatment protocol, perceived benefits from intensive intervention, and indicated they would strongly recommend LSVT LOUD to other parents who have children with DS and motor speech disorders. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results show that children with DS tolerated intensive voice treatment without adverse effects and made select meaningful therapeutic gains. The treatment evidence from this study warrants Phase II treatment studies using LSVT LOUD with a larger group of children with DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol A Boliek
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Angela Halpern
- LSVT Global, Inc., Tucson, AZ
- National Center for Voice and Speech, Denver, CO
| | - Keren Hernandez
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Lorraine Ramig
- LSVT Global, Inc., Tucson, AZ
- National Center for Voice and Speech, Denver, CO
- Columbia University, New York City, NY
- University of Colorado, Boulder
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Connery A, Yaruss JS, Lomheim H, Loucks TM, Galvin R, McCurtin A. Obtaining consensus on core components of stuttering intervention for adults: An e-Delphi Survey with key stakeholders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 57:112-127. [PMID: 34818457 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based practice involves the synthesis of multiple forms of evidence to inform clinical decision-making and treatment evaluation. Practice- and patient-based evidence are two forms of evidence that are under-represented in the stuttering literature. The collection of such knowledge is essential to support the design and delivery of effective stuttering interventions for adults. AIMS To build stakeholder consensus on the core components of intervention for adults who stutter, and to establish a guiding framework for the design and development of evidence-based interventions for adults who stutter. METHODS & PROCEDURES Adults who stutter and speech and language therapists (SLTs) with experience in providing stuttering intervention participated in the three-round e-Delphi Survey focused on: (1) identifying key stuttering intervention components, including principles, practices, and structural and contextual elements; and (2) obtaining group consensus on stuttering intervention components. Statements were categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model adapted to the study of stuttering. OUTCOMES & RESULTS A total of 48 individuals agreed to participate: 48/48 (100%) completed the Round 1 questionnaire, 40/48 (83%) responded to Round 2 and 36/40 (90%) participated in Round 3. Following content analysis of Round 1, 101 statements were developed, and consensus was achieved on 89 statements perceived as representing the core components of stuttering intervention for adults. Categorization of these statements reflected the key stuttering intervention components relating to personal reactions to stuttering, limitations in life participation and environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Consensus on the core components of stuttering intervention was reached through engagement with key stakeholders. The evidence-based framework presented highlights the range of key intervention components a clinician should consider when designing interventions for adults who stutter. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Evidence-based practice endorses the synthesis of multiple knowledge forms including research, practice and patient evidence to support clinical decision-making and treatment evaluation. The stuttering literature is characterized by an over-representation of efficacy evidence, with significantly less practice and patient evidence to guide clinical practice. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study adds valuable practice- and patient-based evidence for effective stuttering intervention components for adults who stutter. These relate to personal reactions to stuttering, limitations in life participation and environmental factors. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This research presents a stakeholder-informed framework for stuttering intervention to guide SLTs working with adults who stutter in designing evidence-based interventions. The framework supports the adoption of a person-centred approach to intervention to ensure each client's unique needs, preferences, values and desired outcomes are explored and integrated into therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Connery
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- HSE Dublin South West, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Scott Yaruss
- Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Holly Lomheim
- ISTAR-Institute for Stuttering Treatment and Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Torrey M Loucks
- ISTAR-Institute for Stuttering Treatment and Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Rose Galvin
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Arlene McCurtin
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Implementation in Science & Technology Research Group, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
This chapter is written for the qualified neurologist or related professional working with persons who have had a stroke or other sudden brain injury. It is critical that the presence of aphasia is detected, no matter how mild the presentation, and to support that assertion, this chapter highlights the plight of persons with latent aphasia. At the individual level, the impact of aphasia is devastating, with overwhelming evidence that aphasia negatively impacts psychosocial outcomes. At the global level, sensitive detection and accurate diagnosis of aphasia are critical for accurate characterization and quantification of the global burden of aphasia. The word "LANGUAGE" is leveraged as an acronym to create a useful and memorable checklist to guide navigation of aphasia screening and assessment: it begins with the definition of language (L), followed by the definition and diagnostic criteria for aphasia (A). Then language abilities and characteristics to be considered in assessment are presented: naming (N); grammar and syntax (G); unintelligible words, jargon, and paraphasias (U); auditory comprehension and repetition (A); graphemic abilities-reading and writing (G); and everyday communication and discourse (E). Recommendations for improving procedural adherence are provided, and a list of potential brief assessment measures are introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D Richardson
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
| | - Sarah Grace Dalton
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brundage SB, Ratner NB, Boyle MP, Eggers K, Everard R, Franken MC, Kefalianos E, Marcotte AK, Millard S, Packman A, Vanryckeghem M, Yaruss JS. Consensus Guidelines for the Assessments of Individuals Who Stutter Across the Lifespan. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2021; 30:2379-2393. [PMID: 34516299 PMCID: PMC9132036 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This project sought to develop consensus guidelines for clinically meaningful, comprehensive assessment procedures for people who stutter across the lifespan. Method Twelve expert clinicians and researchers who have written extensively about stuttering provided detailed descriptions of the type of data that they routinely collect during diagnostic evaluations of preschool children, school-age children, adolescents, and adults who stutter. Iterative content analysis, with repeated input from the respondents, was used to identify core areas that reflect common domains that these experts judge to be important for evaluating stuttering for varying age groups. Results Six core areas were identified as common components of a comprehensive evaluation of stuttering and people who stutter. These areas should be included to varying degrees depending upon the age and needs of the client or family. The core areas include the following: (a) stuttering-related background information; (b) speech, language, and temperament development (especially for younger clients); (c) speech fluency and stuttering behaviors; (d) reactions to stuttering by the speaker; (e) reactions to stuttering by people in the speaker's environment; and (f) adverse impact caused by stuttering. Discussion These consensus recommendations can help speech-language pathologists who are uncertain about appropriate stuttering assessment procedures to design and conduct more thorough evaluations, so that they will be better prepared to provide individualized and comprehensive treatment for people who stutter across the lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley B. Brundage
- Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Michael P. Boyle
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Bloomfield, NJ
| | - Kurt Eggers
- Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Thomas More University, Antwerp, Belgium
- Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Finland
| | | | - Marie-Christine Franken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elaina Kefalianos
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Speech & Language Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne K. Marcotte
- Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens
| | - Sharon Millard
- The Michael Palin Centre for Stammering Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Packman
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martine Vanryckeghem
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando
| | - J. Scott Yaruss
- Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baylor C, Eadie T, Yorkston K. The Communicative Participation Item Bank: Evaluating, and Reevaluating, Its Use across Communication Disorders in Adults. Semin Speech Lang 2021; 42:225-239. [PMID: 34261165 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential in patient-centered, evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. PROs respect individuals who live with communication disorders as key stakeholders providing a critically unique perspective on consequences of communication disorders, and whether interventions bring about meaningful changes. Some PROs focus on specific communication symptoms such as voice or language symptom severity, while others focus on broader constructs such as quality of life. Many PROs target specific diagnostic groups. This article presents the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), a PRO that measures communicative participation restrictions. The CPIB was based on the concept of participation, or engagement in life situations, as defined in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. It was designed to be relevant for adults across different communication disorders to facilitate clinical and research activities that may involve either comparing or aggregating data across communication disorders. The CPIB follows current PRO development protocols including systematic guidance from stakeholders through cognitive interviews, and the measurement methods of Item Response Theory that allow precise and adaptive assessment. This article reviews use of the CPIB across different diagnostic groups, and identifies needs for future efforts to expand the relevance of the CPIB further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tanya Eadie
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kathryn Yorkston
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Datson N, Lolli L, Drust B, Atkinson G, Weston M, Gregson W. Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players. SCI MED FOOTBALL 2021; 6:248-261. [DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2021.1942538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Datson
- Institute of Sport, University of Chichester, Chichester, UK
- Football Exchange, Research Institute of Sport Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lorenzo Lolli
- Football Exchange, Research Institute of Sport Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Barry Drust
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Greg Atkinson
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Matthew Weston
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Warren Gregson
- Football Exchange, Research Institute of Sport Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Olszewski A, Rae K. Measuring Stakeholder Perceptions: A Review of Social Validity Reporting in ASHA Journals. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2021; 30:1247-1260. [PMID: 33929909 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Intervention research in speech-language pathology is growing; however, there remains a gap between research and clinical practice. To promote evidence-based practice, stakeholder input may be solicited during the development and evaluation of treatments. One method of evaluating stakeholder input is by subjectively measuring social validity. Social validity probes end users' satisfaction and acceptability of a treatment. Method This review article explores the type and frequency of subjective social validity measures reported in speech-language pathology treatment literature published in American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology; Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; and Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools from January 2017 through April 2019. In total, 93 treatment studies were included and coded descriptively. Results Of the 93 treatment studies included in this review, 20 reported subjective measures of social validity. The most common method of measurement was questionnaires (n = 19), followed by interviews (n = 5), and direct observation (n = 1). Conclusions Only 21.5% of reviewed speech-language pathology treatment articles from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association journals reported measures of social validity, although it is a crucial component of implementation of evidence-based practice. We urge researchers and journal editors to include social validity measures in treatment literature as we promote the uptake of evidence-based practices and the involvement of stakeholders during the development of evidence-based practices. We also encourage the development of social validity measures that can be validated on individuals with communication disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold Olszewski
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH
| | - Kirsty Rae
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thistle J, Thiessen A. Effectiveness and Utility of Visual Scene Displays as Communication Supports for Adults and Children With Complex Communication Needs: Perspectives of Clinicians and Researchers. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2021; 30:1181-1193. [PMID: 33974450 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aims of this research study were to describe the perspectives of clinicians and researchers regarding the effectiveness of visual scene displays (VSDs) as communication supports in order to inform the translation of research to clinical practice. Method An online survey was completed by 298 clinicians and nine VSD researchers. Participants rated the effectiveness of VSDs in supporting a variety of communication functions and their strength of agreement regarding statements of VSD utility. Results Regardless of population served, clinicians and researchers rated VSDs as effective at supporting a range of communication functions. Participants also tended to agree with statements of VSD utility. Conclusions The current study highlights the perceptions of clinicians and researchers regarding the uses and benefits of VSDs for adults and children with complex communication needs and provides an initial measure of the current translation of research to clinical practice. Results indicate that VSDs can be used to support a variety of communication functions and utilities; however, further work is necessary to explore additional communication functions and delineate similarities and differences of VSD uses for differing populations. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14551344.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Thistle
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western Washington University, Bellingham
| | - Amber Thiessen
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Robinson OC, Sebah I, McNay I, Field J, Wragg J, Stevenson M, Newton P. Evaluating the REP-S brief resilience intervention for students in higher education: a multi-study mixed-methods programme of research. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2021.1888372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver C. Robinson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Ilham Sebah
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Ian McNay
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Field
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Jane Wragg
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Mandy Stevenson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Paul Newton
- Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Main Concept, Sequencing, and Story Grammar Analyses of Cinderella Narratives in a Large Sample of Persons with Aphasia. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11010110. [PMID: 33467602 PMCID: PMC7830981 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, a multilevel analytic approach called Main Concept, Sequencing, and Story Grammar (MSSG) was presented along with preliminary normative information. MSSG analyses leverage the strong psychometrics and rich procedural knowledge of both main concept analysis and story grammar component coding, complementing it with easy-to-obtain sequencing information for a rich understanding of discourse informativeness and macrostructure. This study is the next critical step for demonstrating the clinical usefulness of MSSG’s six variables (main concept composite, sequencing, main concept+sequencing, essential story grammar components, total episodic components, and episodic complexity) for persons with aphasia (PWAs). We present descriptive statistical information for MSSG variables for a large sample of PWAs and compare their performance to a large sample of persons not brain injured (PNBIs). We observed significant differences between PWAs and PNBIs for all MSSG variables. These differences occurred at the omnibus group level and for each aphasia subtype, even for PWAs with very mild impairment that is not detected with standardized aphasia assessment. Differences between PWAs and PNBIs were also practically significant, with medium to large effect sizes observed for nearly all aphasia subtypes and MSSG variables. This work deepens our understanding of discourse informativeness and macrostructure in PWAs and further develops an efficient tool for research and clinical use. Future research should investigate ways to expand MSSG analyses and to improve sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
|
21
|
Colonna S, Sciumé L, Giarda F, Innocenti A, Beretta G, Dalla Costa D. Case Report: Postacute Rehabilitation of Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Cerebral Vasculitis-Like Pattern Accompanied by SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front Neurol 2021; 11:602554. [PMID: 33488499 PMCID: PMC7817886 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.602554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The main clinical manifestation of the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is respiratory issues. Neurological manifestations are being increasingly recognized, including febrile seizures, headache, dizziness, and myalgia, as well as encephalopathy, encephalitis, stroke, and acute peripheral nerve diseases. Cerebral vasculitis is rarely reported. We describe a case of SARS-CoV-2 interstitial pneumonia complicated by flaccid tetraplegia due to Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) associated with a cerebral vasculitis-like pattern. Case description: A 62-year-old man was hospitalized for cough, fever, and severe respiratory failure requiring tracheal intubation and invasive ventilation. The chest Computerized Tomography (CT) showed images related to interstitial pneumonia and the subsequent nasopharyngeal swab confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. During the hospitalization, there was a progressive deterioration of the senses associated with areflexic flaccid tetraplegia. The treatment with high doses of immunoglobulin G (IgG) led to the immediate improvement of the general conditions and a partial response in terms of recovery of the upper limb and of the distal lower limb movements. Subsequently the patient was admitted to our Rehabilitation Unit, where he received an intensive rehabilitation treatment consisting of physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Two months later the patient was discharged at home and able to walk independently even for long distances thanks to the use of Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO). Conclusion: In this report, we present the case of a patient with peripheral and central neurological damage occurred later severe pneumonia induced by SARS-CoV-2. The Immunoglobulin G therapy allowed the patient to benefit considerably from early rehabilitation, reaching the walking, increasing the independence in daily living tasks, and enabling safe discharge from hospital to home. Related neurologic complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection suffer a lack of understanding and further investigations should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Colonna
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Sciumé
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Giarda
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Innocenti
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Beretta
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Dalla Costa
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sønsterud H, Halvorsen MS, Feragen KB, Kirmess M, Ward D. What works for whom? Multidimensional individualized stuttering therapy (MIST). JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2020; 88:106052. [PMID: 33080388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study reports outcomes from a stuttering therapy approach that combines value and awareness-based elements from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with those of stuttering and speech modification interventions. The approach, entitled Multidimensional Individualized Stuttering Therapy (MIST), includes a combined clinician and client selection of factors across five areas: 1) general breathing patterns and body tension, 2) breathing patterns during speech production, 3) vocal features in speech production, 4) value and mindfulness-based strategies, and 5) general communication and/or presentation skills. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether the MIST a) reduces the impact of stuttering and stuttering severity, and b) has a positive impact on speaking ability, confidence in communication, avoidance-behavior, and quality of life. METHOD Eighteen adults, age 21-61 years took part in an A-B-A multiple case study design. Participants underwent a pre-clinic assessment phase, followed by 10 h of therapy over four sessions administered by an experienced speech-language therapist. Outcome measures examined both psychosocial and behavioral aspects of therapy three-, six- and twelve-months post-therapy. RESULTS Most participants chose elements from at least four of the five areas of focus. There was a significant reduction in the impact of stuttering at both 6- and 12-months post-therapy, with moderate (d = .71) to very large (d = 1.06) effect sizes. A strong association was found between overall satisfaction with MIST and improved speaking abilities. Moderate to strong associations were also found between experienced speaking abilities, confidence in communication, reduction in avoidance behaviors and improved quality of life. DISCUSSION Findings indicate that MIST can be effective in managing adult stuttering. The findings highlight the importance of shared decision making and personal considerations using flexible therapy approaches that integrate stuttering and speech modification interventions with value and awareness-based skills. The nature of a multidimensional individualized approach, as shown in this study, highlights the importance of adjusting the relative weighting of different subcomponents according to each individual's needs and goals. CONCLUSION MIST was shown to be efficacious in clinical settings and effective in real life settings. Findings were promising, despite a relatively small sample, and replication by other SLPs and with larger samples is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Sønsterud
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Speech and Language Disorders, Statped, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | - Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - David Ward
- University of Reading, Department of Speech Research Laboratory, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McGill N, McLeod S, Ivory N, Davis E, Rohr K. Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating Active versus Passive Waiting for Speech-Language Pathology. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2020; 73:335-354. [PMID: 32756053 DOI: 10.1159/000508830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High demand for speech-language pathology means children sometimes wait over 12 months for services, missing out on timely support. Waiting can be a time of stress, concern, and powerlessness for caregivers. Provision of information via a website may support families and encourage active waiting. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare children's speech, intelligibility, language, and literacy outcomes, and caregivers' satisfaction and empowerment in active versus passive waiting conditions. METHODS Ninety-seven preschool-aged children referred to a community health speech-language pathology service in Australia were screened for eligibility. Eligible children (n =42) with speech/language difficulties were randomly allocated to: (a) active waiting (provision of a purpose-built website; n = 20), or (b) passive waiting (control group; n = 22). Pre- and post-assessments (after 6 months on a waiting list) were completed with children and caregivers by a speech-language pathologist blinded to group allocations. RESULTS Intention to treat (n =36) and per-protocol analyses (n =30) were conducted to measure group differences in child and caregiver outcomes at post-assessment using one-way ANCOVA, controlling for baseline scores. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for children's speech, intelligibility, language, and literacy, or caregivers' empowerment and satisfaction. Children in both groups made minimal gains over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Provision of an active waiting website did not lead to statistically significant change in child or caregiver outcomes, and children in both groups made little progress over a 6-month period. Early speech-language pathology intervention delivered with appropriate dosage is needed to optimise children's outcomes. Until timely and effective speech-language pathology intervention can be provided for all who need it, provision of early assessments may be beneficial. There remains a need for effective ways to support children and families on waiting lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole McGill
- Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia,
| | - Sharynne McLeod
- Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicola Ivory
- Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Davis
- Western NSW Local Health District, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katrina Rohr
- Western NSW Local Health District, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baylor C, Darling-White M. Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2020; 29:1335-1360. [PMID: 32463702 PMCID: PMC7893522 DOI: 10.1044/2020_ajslp-19-00043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health calls on speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to provide care that impacts all aspects of an individual's experience with a communication disorder, including their participation in valued life situations. However, SLPs often report feeling unprepared to implement and document interventions that target life participation. The purpose of this article is to propose a framework to guide participation-focused intervention practices. This age- and disorder-generic framework is designed to be applicable with clients across the variety of settings in which SLPs work. Method In this clinical focus article, we draw on past research and clinical experience to propose a restructuring of World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health components such that participation is the primary focus and outcomes indicator for intervention. In this framework, a specific communicative participation situation is identified and assessed quantitatively, and a corresponding participation-focused goal is established through shared decision making. Following that, assessments are conducted and goals are established in the areas of communication skills, physical and social environments, and personal perspectives. Results The proposed framework provides a concrete organizational structure as well as assessment, goal-writing, and intervention examples to assist SLPs in translating theoretical biopsychosocial frameworks into clinical practices. Conclusions SLPs can and do provide holistic communication services to clients to help them achieve their life participation goals. This article provides an example as to how we can document the need for, as well as the value and impact of our important work, meeting the diverse life participation needs of clients. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12360758.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Meghan Darling-White
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vaganian L, Bussmann S, Gerlach AL, Kusch M, Labouvie H, Cwik JC. Critical consideration of assessment methods for clinically significant changes of mental distress after psycho-oncological interventions. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2020; 29:e1821. [PMID: 32090408 PMCID: PMC7301279 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Considering the heterogeneity of cancer entities and the associated disease progression, personalized care of patients is increasingly emphasized in psycho-oncology. This individualization makes the use of measurements of individual clinically significant change important when studying the efficacy and effectiveness of psycho-oncological care. Two conceptualizations for the measurement of clinical significance are critically contrasted in this study: the Reliable Change Index (RCI) and the Minimal Important Difference (MID) method. METHODS In total, 2,121 cancer patients participated in the study and a subsample of 708 patients was reassessed about 4 months later. Psychological distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. We evaluated two measures of clinical significance (RCI, MID) by comparing the respective numbers of improved, unimproved, and deteriorated patients. RESULTS Individually significant changes were observed with both methods; however, determined rates of improvement differed substantially: MID (66.67%) and RCI (48.23%). Most importantly, according to MID, 17.93% of patients were identified as being improved, although their respective improvements were not statistically significant and thus unreliable. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of RCI outweigh MID, and therefore, the RCI is recommended as a measure to assess change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusine Vaganian
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sonja Bussmann
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander L Gerlach
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Kusch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section: Clinical Psycho-Oncology, Working Group Psycho-Oncological Health Services Research, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hildegard Labouvie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section: Clinical Psycho-Oncology, Working Group Psycho-Oncological Health Services Research, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan C Cwik
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gaeta L, Brydges CR. An Examination of Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:1572-1580. [PMID: 32343919 DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose was to examine and determine effect size distributions reported in published audiology and speech-language pathology research in order to provide researchers and clinicians with more relevant guidelines for the interpretation of potentially clinically meaningful findings. Method Cohen's d, Hedges' g, Pearson r, and sample sizes (n = 1,387) were extracted from 32 meta-analyses in journals in speech-language pathology and audiology. Percentile ranks (25th, 50th, 75th) were calculated to determine estimates for small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively. The median sample size was also used to explore statistical power for small, medium, and large effect sizes. Results For individual differences research, effect sizes of Pearson r = .24, .41, and .64 were found. For group differences, Cohen's d/Hedges' g = 0.25, 0.55, and 0.93. These values can be interpreted as small, medium, and large effect sizes in speech-language pathology and audiology. The majority of published research was inadequately powered to detect a medium effect size. Conclusions Effect size interpretations from published research in audiology and speech-language pathology were found to be underestimated based on Cohen's (1988, 1992) guidelines. Researchers in the field should consider using Pearson r = .25, .40, and .65 and Cohen's d/Hedges' g = 0.25, 0.55, and 0.95 as small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively, and collect larger sample sizes to ensure that both significant and nonsignificant findings are robust and replicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gaeta
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, California State University, Sacramento
| | - Christopher R Brydges
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sønsterud H, Feragen KB, Kirmess M, Halvorsen MS, Ward D. What do people search for in stuttering therapy: Personal goal-setting as a gold standard? JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2020; 85:105944. [PMID: 31607438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stuttering affects people in individual ways, and there are multiple factors which may influence a person's goals when seeking therapy. Even though there is a common consensus that speech-language pathologists should discuss the individual's goals and expectations for stuttering therapy and outcomes, few studies have systematically investigated this issue. The aims of the present study were to investigate individual motivations and goal-setting related factors in stuttering therapy. The associations between self-reported impact of stuttering and the participants' perceptions of stuttering interference in communication, speaking abilities, and relationships with other people were also investigated. METHOD This study is part of a wider-ranging treatment study of individualized stuttering management tailored to the participants' personal goals and preferences. A mixed method, multiple single-case design was used to address the research questions. Twenty-one adults, age 21-61 years, took part in a pretherapy interview, which also included two quantitative measures: the Client Preferences for Stuttering Therapy-Extended version (CPST-E) and the Overall Assessment of Speakers' Experience of Stuttering-Adult version (OASES-A). Findings from the study sample was compared with a Norwegian reference group, in order to check for the representativeness of the study sample. RESULTS Quantitative data showed that most participants wanted to focus on both physical and psychological aspects of therapy, and that 95% considered 'to gain a sense of control over the stuttering' as important. Participants' perspectives on their speaking ability and stuttering interference in communication were identified as central factors, particularly in social and professional settings. These outcomes aligned well with the finding of avoidance behaviors, such as avoiding words and speaking situations. Qualitative data identified four main areas that the participants wanted to improve: speech fluency, emotional functioning, activity and participation, and understanding of their stuttering. CONCLUSION The study confirms that multiple and individual factors may influence the person's goals for therapy. Goals were mainly anchored in participants' wish of better coping in real world settings. A high degree of avoidance behavior was reported, suggesting that anxiety, and in particular linguistic-related anxiety needs to be taken into account when addressing social anxiety in fluency disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Sønsterud
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Statped, Department of Speech and Language Disorders, Norway.
| | | | - Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Norway; Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Norway
| | | | - David Ward
- University of Reading, Speech Research Laboratory, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A systematic review of effectiveness of interventions applicable to radiotherapy that are administered to improve patient comfort, increase patient compliance, and reduce patient distress or anxiety. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 26:314-324. [PMID: 32245711 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to search existing literature to identify comfort interventions that can be used to assist an adult patient to undergo complex radiotherapy requiring positional stability for periods greater than 10 min. The objectives of this review were to; 1) identify comfort interventions used for clinical procedures that involve sustained inactivity similar to radiotherapy; 2) define characteristics of comfort interventions for future practice; and 3) determine the effectiveness of identified comfort interventions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses statement and the Template-for-Intervention-Description-and Replication guide were used. KEY FINDINGS The literature search was performed using PICO criteria with five databases (AMED, CINAHL EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) identifying 5269 titles. After screening, 46 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen interventions were reported and were grouped into four categories: Audio-visual, Psychological, Physical, and Other interventions (education/information and aromatherapy). The majority of aromatherapy, one audio-visual and one educational intervention were judged to be clinically significant for improving patient comfort based on anxiety outcome measures (effect size ≥ 0.4, mean change is greater than the Minimal-Important-Difference and low-risk-of-bias). Medium to large effect sizes were reported in many interventions where differences did not exceed the Minimal-Important-Difference for the measure. These interventions were deemed worthy of further investigation. CONCLUSION Several interventions were identified that may improve comfort during radiotherapy assisting patients to sustain and endure the same position over time. This is crucial for the continual growth of complex radiotherapy requiring a need for comfort to ensure stability for targeted treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Further investigation of comfort interventions is warranted, including tailoring interventions to patient choice and determining if multiple interventions can be used concurrently to improve effectiveness.
Collapse
|
29
|
Spell LA, Richardson JD, Basilakos A, Stark BC, Teklehaimanot A, Hillis AE, Fridriksson J. Developing, Implementing, and Improving Assessment and Treatment Fidelity in Clinical Aphasia Research. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2020; 29:286-298. [PMID: 31990598 PMCID: PMC7231909 DOI: 10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-00126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe the development and implementation of a fidelity program for an ongoing, multifacility, aphasia intervention study and to explain how initial fidelity measures are being used to improve study integrity. Method A Clinical Core team developed and incorporated a fidelity plan in this study. The aims of the Clinical Core team were to (a) supervise data collection and data management at each clinical site, (b) optimize and monitor assessment fidelity, and (c) optimize and monitor treatment fidelity. Preliminary data are being used to guide ongoing efforts to preserve and improve the fidelity of this intervention study. Results Preliminary results show that specific recruitment strategies help to improve appropriate referrals and that accommodations to participants and their families help to maintain excellent retention. A streamlined and centralized training program assures the reliability of assessors and raters for the study's assessment and treatment protocols. Ongoing monitoring of both assessment and treatment tasks helps to maintain study integrity. Less-than-optimal interrater reliability data for the raters of some of the discourse measures guided the Clinical Core team to address the training and coding inconsistencies in a timely manner. Conclusions The creation of a Clinical Core team is instrumental in developing and implementing a fidelity plan for improved assessment and treatment fidelity. Intentional planning and assignment of study staff to implement and monitor ongoing fidelity measures assures that clinical data are reliable and valid. Ongoing review of the plan shows areas of strengths and weaknesses for continuing adjustments and improvement of study fidelity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Ann Spell
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| | | | - Alexandra Basilakos
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| | - Brielle C. Stark
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington
- Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University Bloomington
| | - Abeba Teklehaimanot
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Argye E. Hillis
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Julius Fridriksson
- Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brydges CR, Gaeta L. An Analysis of Nonsignificant Results in Audiology Using Bayes Factors. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019; 62:4544-4553. [PMID: 31805244 DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-h-19-0182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Null hypothesis significance testing is commonly used in audiology research to determine the presence of an effect. Knowledge of study outcomes, including nonsignificant findings, is important for evidence-based practice. Nonsignificant p values obtained from null hypothesis significance testing cannot differentiate between true null effects or underpowered studies. Bayes factors (BFs) are a statistical technique that can distinguish between conclusive and inconclusive nonsignificant results, and quantify the strength of evidence in favor of 1 hypothesis over another. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of BFs in nonsignificant results in audiology research and the strength of evidence in favor of the null hypothesis in these results. Method Nonsignificant results mentioned in abstracts of articles published in 2018 volumes of 4 prominent audiology journals were extracted (N = 108) and categorized based on whether BFs were calculated. BFs were calculated from nonsignificant t tests within this sample to determine how frequently the null hypothesis was strongly supported. Results Nonsignificant results were not directly tested with BFs in any study. Bayesian re-analysis of 93 nonsignificant t tests found that only 40.86% of findings provided moderate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis, and none provided strong evidence. Conclusion BFs are underutilized in audiology research, and a large proportion of null findings were deemed inconclusive when re-analyzed with BFs. Researchers are encouraged to use BFs to test the validity and strength of evidence of nonsignificant results and ensure that sufficient sample sizes are used so that conclusive findings (significant or not) are observed more frequently. Supplemental Material https://osf.io/b4kc7/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Brydges
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
| | - Laura Gaeta
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, California State University, Sacramento
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rocha M, Yaruss J, Rato J. Stuttering Impact: A Shared Perception for Parents and Children? Folia Phoniatr Logop 2019; 72:478-486. [DOI: 10.1159/000504221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
<b><i>Background/Aims:</i></b> Previous research has provided information about how school-aged children perceive their own stuttering; however, less is known about how stuttering is perceived by their parents. The ways that parents view their children’s stuttering could influence how the children themselves react to it. This study proceeds to assess how parents’ perceptions of the impact of stuttering relate to the perceptions of children. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Participants were 50 children who stutter aged 7–12 years (mean = 9.10; SD = 1.7) and their parents, recruited from different cities in Portugal. The European Portuguese version of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering was administered to the children, and an adapted version of the tool was administered to their parents. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both parents and children showed generally similar overall impact ratings, typically falling in the mild and moderate ranges. Differences were observed in families with a history of stuttering: for those families, a comparison of parents’ and children’s scores revealed, in some domains, that parents perceived the impact of stuttering to be greater than the children did, especially related with children’s reactions to stuttering and their quality of life. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Knowledge about how parents perceive the impact of stuttering on their children is important because families can play a key role in helping children cope with stuttering. These findings highlight the benefits of using an individualized treatment approach for each child that focuses on their perceptions, as well as on those of the parents, in order to address negative attitudes toward children’s stuttering.
Collapse
|
32
|
Sønsterud H, Kirmess M, Howells K, Ward D, Feragen KB, Halvorsen MS. The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 54:606-619. [PMID: 30866151 PMCID: PMC6617998 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple factors can influence the working alliance and treatment outcome in speech and language therapy. The 'working alliance' is an important concept in treatment and can be described as the degree to which a treatment dyad is engaged in collaborative, purposive work. To date, relatively little attention has been paid to this concept within speech and language treatment in general, and within stuttering treatment research in particular. AIMS To investigate the role of the working alliance within stuttering treatment, and to evaluate whether the quality of the working alliance correlated with clients' concept of motivation and treatment outcomes 6 months post-therapy. METHODS & PROCEDURES Eighteen adults (21-61 years) participated in this multiple single-case treatment study, with treatment facilitated by an experienced speech and language therapist. The working alliance was investigated using the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Version Revised (WAI-SR), an Extended version of the Client Preferences for Stuttering Treatment (CPST-E), the Overall Assessment of Speakers' Experience of Stuttering-Adult version (OASES-A), the Wright & Ayre Stuttering Self-Rating Profile (WASSP) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). OUTCOMES & RESULTS Analyses demonstrated significant associations between the working alliance and client motivation (r = 0.781) and treatment outcomes (r = 0.644) 6 months post-treatment. The association between client-led goals and therapy tasks appeared particularly important. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The working alliance between speech and language therapists and persons who stutter matters. Within the alliance, the level of client-clinician agreement on treatment goals and therapy tasks may be of greater importance than the bond between client and clinician. Further research with greater numbers of participants is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Sønsterud
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- StatpedDepartment of Speech and Language DisordersOsloNorway
| | - Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs EducationUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalNorway
| | | | - David Ward
- University of ReadingSpeech Research LaboratoryReadingUK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Namasivayam AK, Pukonen M, Goshulak D, Granata F, Le DJ, Kroll R, van Lieshout P. Investigating intervention dose frequency for children with speech sound disorders and motor speech involvement. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 54:673-686. [PMID: 30941860 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment outcome data for children with severe speech sound disorders with motor speech involvement (SSD-MSI) are derived from Phase I clinical research studies. These studies have demonstrated positive improvements in speech production. Currently there is no research examining the optimal treatment dose frequency for this population. The results of this study, which is the first of its kind, will inform the delivery of effective services for this population. AIMS To investigate optimal treatment dose frequency for the Motor Speech Treatment Protocol (MSTP) for children with SSD-MSI. METHODS & PROCEDURES A total of 48 children (aged 43-47 months) with SSD-MSI participated in the study. Participants received 45-min MSTP intervention sessions either once per week (lower dose frequency) or twice per week (higher dose frequency) for a 10-week period. Blinded outcome assessments were carried out at pre- and post-intervention. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Treatment-related change was assessed at body structures, functions and activities participation level as per the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning framework: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) framework WHO (2007). These measures are related to articulation, functional communication and speech intelligibility. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that for all variables the baseline scores were not statistically different (p > 0.05) between the two dose-frequency groups. Overall, there was a significant main effect of Time (pre-post) across all variables (p < 0.01). However, repeated-measures ANOVA did not result in any statistical interactions (Time × Dose frequency) for any of the variables tested (p > 0.05). Only marginal clinical advantages (< 4% change in intelligibility) were noted with the 10 extra sessions. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Overall, the MSTP intervention approach in conjunction with home practice led to significant positive changes for all measures in children with SSD-MSI. No statistical differences between high- and low-dose-frequency groups were observed for any of the variables. Clinical effects were examined using effect sizes, as well as changes in articulation, speech intelligibility and functional communication; these differed marginally between the two dose frequencies. This suggests limited benefits of 10 additional sessions per block. Thus, it is recommended that caregivers, speech-language therapists and policy-makers perform a cost-benefit analysis before determining the dose frequency, when considering additional sessions per block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aravind K Namasivayam
- Oral Dynamics Lab, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Margit Pukonen
- The Speech and Stuttering Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Debra Goshulak
- The Speech and Stuttering Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Francesca Granata
- Oral Dynamics Lab, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D James Le
- Oral Dynamics Lab, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Kroll
- The Speech and Stuttering Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pascal van Lieshout
- Oral Dynamics Lab, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Skoczylas MJ. Congruence in Research Question, Design, and Analysis: A Tutorial on the Measurement of Change in Clinical Speech and Language Research. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2019; 50:167-178. [PMID: 31017852 DOI: 10.1044/2018_lshss-17-0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Measuring change is a common goal in clinical research, and comparing nonequivalent groups is sometimes a necessity in this context. Yet, evaluating change in this way can be problematic, and little consensus is reported on the best way to conduct such an evaluation. This tutorial presents the process of planning a clinical study designed to measure change in the context of a therapeutic intervention. Method This article presents a hypothetical clinical research scenario and follows the process of study design from question formulation to interpretation of results. The presentation focuses on the use of gain score analysis in the context of nonequivalent participant groups, methods that may be particularly relevant to the clinical context. Conditions that are favorable to gain score use, as well as situations that are problematic for gain score use, are presented. Conclusions In this article, the clinical research process is presented, following a logical process from formulation of a clear research question to selection of an appropriate research design to implementation of an effective analysis method. Gain score analysis is presented as an effective tool to measure change in clinical research, even with nonequivalent groups, given the correct conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Skoczylas
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures contain information that comes directly from the patient without interpretation by anyone else. These measures are an important part of a clinicians' arsenal of assessment approaches and are critical in the development of patient-centered approaches to intervention. In this introduction to patient-reported outcome measurement tools, a history is provided of this approach to measurement and its place within the context of clinical research and practice. The process of instrument development and application will be reviewed, along with examples of measurement tools from the field of neurological communication disorders. This introduction is supplemented by references that provide interested readers with more detailed information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Yorkston
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Karimi H, Onslow M, Jones M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Menzies R, Reilly S, Sommer M, Jelčić-Jakšić S. The Satisfaction with Communication in Everyday Speaking Situations (SCESS) scale: An overarching outcome measure of treatment effect. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2018; 58:77-85. [PMID: 30392583 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement strongly suggests one primary outcome for clinical trials, yet the outcomes of stuttering treatments span numerous behavioral and psychosocial domains. That presents a roadblock to eventual meta-analysis of clinical trials for adults who stutter. METHOD We propose a simple and convenient outcome measure for clinical trials of stuttering treatment for adults that spans whatever behavioral and psychosocial factors might impel clients to seek treatment: a nine-point scale of Satisfaction with Communication in Everyday Speaking Situations (SCESS). The scale consists of one question which is simple, brief, easy to administer, cost-free, and translatable into many languages. The present report develops the SCESS scale by determining its reliability, content validity, and construct validity. RESULTS Reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the SCESS were confirmed with statistically significant and substantive correlations with speech-related and anxiety-related measures. However, the SCESS did not correlate well with percentage syllables stuttered. Three behavioral and psychosocial measures had the highest correlation with the SCESS: total Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering, self-reported stuttering severity, and Unhelpful Thoughts and Beliefs about Stuttering. CONCLUSION The SCESS measure has potential to be applied as an overarching clinical trial outcome measure of stuttering treatment effect. This study provides some preliminary evidence for including it as a primary or secondary outcome in clinical trials of adult stuttering treatments. However, further studies are needed to establish the SCESS responsiveness to different stuttering treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Karimi
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 1825, Australia.
| | - Mark Onslow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 1825, Australia.
| | - Mark Jones
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Level 2, Public Health Building, Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Australia.
| | - Sue O'Brian
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 1825, Australia.
| | - Ann Packman
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 1825, Australia.
| | - Ross Menzies
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW, 1825, Australia.
| | | | - Martin Sommer
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cooke K, Millard SK. The Most Important Therapy Outcomes for School-Aged Children Who Stutter: An Exploratory Study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2018; 27:1152-1163. [PMID: 30347060 DOI: 10.1044/2018_ajslp-odc11-17-0195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this article was to identify what school-aged children who stutter consider to be the most important outcomes from therapy. METHOD A Delphi approach was employed for the study. Eighteen participants aged 9-13 years completed a survey, generating 90 statements that would constitute successful therapy outcomes. After categorization and reduction, 79 statements were sent to participants in a second survey to seek consensus on their importance. Fifteen participants aged 8-14 years completed this second survey. Statements with the highest median ratings and smallest standard deviations were retained. RESULTS Twenty-one statements were retained after analysis. These reflected hopes for affective and behavioral change in the young person and in other people after therapy. Important outcomes included, but are not limited to, increased fluency, greater independence, increased confidence at school, others knowing how to support the individual, and communication situations feeling easier. CONCLUSIONS Participants identified a range of outcomes that were important to achieve as a result of speech and language therapy. The findings suggest a need for a more holistic view of what is meant by successful therapy, incorporating improvements in the ability to communicate and participate in daily situations. The findings suggest that an integrated or holistic approach to intervention would be required to achieve these goals and should include significant others from the child's environment. The important statements identified in this study could be used to inform the content of therapy and to evaluate change over time. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7144205.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sharon K Millard
- City University London, United Kingdom
- The Michael Palin Centre for Stammering, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Euler HA, Neumann K. Stuttering treatment and brain research in adults: A still unfolding relationship. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2018; 55:106-119. [PMID: 28413060 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain imaging and brain stimulation procedures have now been used for more than two decades to investigate the neural systems that contribute to the occurrence of stuttering in adults, and to identify processes that might enhance recovery from stuttering. The purpose of this paper is to review the extent to which these dual lines of research with adults who stutter have intersected and whether they are contributing towards the alleviation of this impairment. METHOD Several areas of research are reviewed in order to determine whether research on the neurology of stuttering is showing any potential for advancing the treatment of this communication disorder: (a) attempts to discover the neurology of stuttering, (b) neural changes associated with treated recovery, and (c) direct neural intervention. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Although much has been learned about the neural underpinnings of stuttering, little research in any of the reviewed areas has thus far contributed to the advancement of stuttering treatment. Much of the research on the neurology of stuttering that does have therapy potential has been largely driven by a speech-motor model that is designed to account for the efficacy of fluency-inducing strategies and strategies that have been shown to yield therapy benefits. Investigations on methods that will induce neuroplasticity are overdue. Strategies profitable with other disorders have only occasionally been employed. However, there are signs that investigations on the neurology of adults who have recovered from stuttering are slowly being recognized for their potential in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger J Ingham
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Janis C Ingham
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Harald A Euler
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Katrin Neumann
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marcotte AK. Evidence, Goals, and Outcomes in Stuttering Treatment: Applications With an Adolescent Who Stutters. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018; 49:23-32. [DOI: 10.1044/2017_lshss-17-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this clinical focus article is to summarize 1 possible process that a clinician might follow in designing and conducting a treatment program with John, a 14-year-old male individual who stutters.
Method
The available research evidence, practitioner experience, and consideration of individual preferences are combined to address goals, treatment procedures, and outcomes for John.
Conclusions
The stuttering treatment research literature includes multiple well-designed reviews and individual studies that have shown the effectiveness of prolonged speech (and smooth speech and related variations) for improving stuttered speech and for improving social, emotional, cognitive, and related variables in adolescents who stutter. Based on that evidence, and incorporating the additional elements of practitioner experience and client preferences, this clinical focus article suggests that John would be likely to benefit from a treatment program based on prolonged speech. The basic structure of 1 possible such program is also described, with an emphasis on the goals and outcomes that John could be expected to achieve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K. Marcotte
- Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Alameer M, Meteyard L, Ward D. Stuttering generalization self-measure: Preliminary development of a self-measuring tool. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2017; 53:41-51. [PMID: 28870333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 03/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Generalization of treatment is considered a difficult task for clinicians and people who stutter (PWS), and can constitute a barrier to long-term treatment success. To our knowledge, there are no standardized tests that collect measurement of the behavioral and cognitive aspects alongside the client's self-perception in real-life speaking situations. PURPOSE This paper describes the preliminary development of a Stuttering Generalization Self-Measure (SGSM). The purpose of SGSM is to assess 1) stuttering severity and 2) speech-anxiety level during real-life situations as perceived by PWS. Additionally, this measurement aims to 3) investigate correlations between stuttering severity and speech-anxiety level within the same real-life situation. METHOD The SGSM initially reported includes nine speaking situations designed that are developed to cover a variety of frequent speaking scenario situations. However, two of these were less commonly encountered by participants and subsequently not included in the final analyses. Items were created according to five listener categories (family and close friends, acquaintances, strangers, persons of authority, and giving a short speech to small audience). Forty-three participants (22 PWS, and 21 control) aged 18 to 53 years were asked to complete the assessment in real-life situations. RESULTS Analyses indicated that test-retest reliability was high for both groups. Discriminant validity was also achieved as the SGSM scores significantly differed between the controls and PWS two groups for stuttering and speech-anxiety. Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations between the SGSM and other speech-related anxiety measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Ward
- University of Reading, United Kingdom; Apple House Centre for Stammering, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rudolph JM. Case History Risk Factors for Specific Language Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2017; 26:991-1010. [PMID: 28672377 DOI: 10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research suggests that the best approach to early identification of children with specific language impairment (SLI) should include assessment of risk factors. However, previous attempts to develop a list for this purpose have been unsuccessful. In this study, systematic review and meta-analytic procedures were used to determine whether any case history factors can be used to identify toddlers at risk of developing SLI. METHOD Epidemiological studies that examined the association between risk factors and SLI were identified. Results across studies were aggregated to determine more precisely the strength of association between each risk factor and the development of SLI. The clinical significance of these factors was established via comparison to late talker status. RESULTS Eleven risk factors were found to be statistically significant predictors of SLI. Among these, maternal education level, 5-min Apgar score, birth order, and biological sex met criteria for clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS At least 4 case history factors are as predictive as late talker status in the context of early identification of toddlers at risk for SLI. The findings of this review highlight the importance of taking a child's genetic and environmental context into consideration when deciding whether further evaluation and early intervention services are warranted. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5150122.
Collapse
|
42
|
McLeod S, Baker E, McCormack J, Wren Y, Roulstone S, Crowe K, Masso S, White P, Howland C. Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Intervention Delivered by Educators for Children With Speech Sound Disorders. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2017; 60:1891-1910. [PMID: 28672376 DOI: 10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-assisted input-based intervention for children with speech sound disorders (SSD). METHOD The Sound Start Study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Seventy-nine early childhood centers were invited to participate, 45 were recruited, and 1,205 parents and educators of 4- and 5-year-old children returned questionnaires. Children whose parents and educators had concerns about speech were assessed (n = 275); 132 children who were identified with phonological pattern-based errors underwent additional assessment. Children with SSD and no difficulties with receptive language or hearing, typical nonverbal intelligence, and English as their primary language were eligible; 123 were randomized into two groups (intervention n = 65; control n = 58), and 3 withdrew. The intervention group involved Phoneme Factory Sound Sorter software (Wren & Roulstone, 2013) administered by educators over 9 weeks; the control group involved typical classroom practices. Participants were reassessed twice by a speech-language pathologist who was unaware of the initial assessment and intervention conditions. RESULTS For the primary outcome variable (percentage of consonants correct), the significant mean change from pre- to postintervention for the intervention group (mean change = +6.15, p < .001) was comparable in magnitude to the significant change for the control group (mean change = +5.43, p < .001) with a small between-groups effect size for change (Cohen's d = 0.08). Similar results occurred for measures of emergent literacy, phonological processing, participation, and well-being. CONCLUSION Computer-assisted input-based intervention administered by educators did not result in greater improvement than typical classroom practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yvonne Wren
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, United KingdomUniversity of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Roulstone
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, United KingdomUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Paul White
- University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Howland
- The University of Sydney, AustraliaCharles Sturt University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Does the NRS Capture Changes in Communication during Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 26:2181-2190. [PMID: 28595967 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Ontario, the National Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS) is mandated for use as a measurement of change for stroke patients after admission to and discharge from rehabilitation. The NRS includes the functional independence measure (FIM) and supplementary measurement items developed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Uncertainty exists regarding the efficacy of the NRS as the sole measure of outcome for communication in stroke rehabilitation patients. The use of additional speech-language pathology outcome measurement tools for this population has therefore been suggested. OBJECTIVES This study sought to establish whether the FIM and CIHI communication items capture quantifiable gains during stroke rehabilitation and therefore whether additional measures are needed to assess outcomes. METHODS A retrospective analysis was completed of 1252 complete data records of stroke patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at Hamilton Health Sciences between 2006 and 2011. RESULTS AND IMPACT Statistically significant improvements were observed in all total matched FIM scores (M = 72.68 to M = 96.39, P < .001) and for each expression (M = 4.61 to M = 5.35, P < .001) and comprehension (M = 4.69 to M = 5.33, P < .001) subscale. The most severely affected group demonstrated the greatest gains. These findings were independent of stroke severity. Additional outcome measurement tools for communication are therefore not required to assess outcomes in rehabilitation of stroke patients, although additional research is necessary to evaluate the clinical significance of the improvements that are observed using existing measurements of change.
Collapse
|
44
|
Smith KA, Iverach L, O'Brian S, Mensah F, Kefalianos E, Hearne A, Reilly S. Anxiety in 11-Year-Old Children Who Stutter: Findings From a Prospective Longitudinal Community Sample. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2017; 60:1211-1222. [PMID: 28418529 DOI: 10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-16-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine if a community sample of 11-year-old children with persistent stuttering have higher anxiety than children who have recovered from stuttering and nonstuttering controls. METHOD Participants in a community cohort study were categorized into 3 groups: (a) those with persistent stuttering, (b) those with recovered stuttering, and (c) nonstuttering controls. Linear regression modeling compared outcomes on measures of child anxiety and emotional and behavioral functioning for the 3 groups. RESULTS Without adjustment for covariates (unadjusted analyses), the group with persistent stuttering showed significantly increased anxiety compared with the recovered stuttering group and nonstuttering controls. The group with persistent stuttering had a higher number of children with autism spectrum disorder and/or learning difficulties. Once these variables were included as covariates in subsequent analysis, there was no difference in anxiety, emotional and behavioral functioning, or temperament among groups. CONCLUSION Although recognized to be associated with stuttering in clinical samples, anxiety was not higher in school-age children who stutter in a community cohort. It may be that anxiety develops later or is less marked in community cohorts compared with clinical samples. We did, however, observe higher anxiety scores in those children who stuttered and had autism spectrum disorder or learning difficulties. Implications and recommendations for research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie A Smith
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Iverach
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde NSW, Australia
| | - Susan O'Brian
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Mensah
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elaina Kefalianos
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Hearne
- Speech Language Therapy, Institute of Education, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand
| | - Sheena Reilly
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Desjardins M, Halstead L, Cooke M, Bonilha HS. A Systematic Review of Voice Therapy: What “Effectiveness” Really Implies. J Voice 2017; 31:392.e13-392.e32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
46
|
Richardson JD, Hudspeth Dalton SG, Shafer J, Patterson J. Assessment Fidelity in Aphasia Research. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2016; 25:S788-S797. [PMID: 27997953 PMCID: PMC7212813 DOI: 10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Revised: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Purpose In aphasia treatment literature, scarce attention is paid to factors that may reduce a study's validity, including adherence to assessment and treatment procedures (i.e., fidelity). Although guidelines have been established for evaluating and reporting treatment fidelity, none exist for assessment fidelity. Method We reviewed treatment fidelity guidelines and related literature to identify assessment fidelity components. We then examined 88 aphasia treatment studies published between 2010 and 2015 and report the frequency with which researchers provide information regarding the following assessment fidelity components: assessment instruments, assessor qualifications, assessor or rater training, assessment delivery, assessor or rater reliability, and assessor blinding. Results We found that 4.5% of studies reported information regarding assessment instruments, 35.2% reported information regarding assessor qualifications, 6.85% reported information regarding assessor or rater training, 37.5% reported information regarding assessor or rater reliability, 27.3% reported on assessor blinding, and no studies reported information regarding assessment delivery. Conclusions There is a paucity of assessment fidelity information reported in aphasia treatment research. The authors propose a set of guidelines to ensure readers will be able to evaluate assessment fidelity, and thus study validity.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kaipa R, Peterson AM. A systematic review of treatment intensity in speech disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2016; 18:507-520. [PMID: 27063688 DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1126640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment intensity (sometimes referred to as "practice amount") has been well-investigated in learning non-speech tasks, but its role in treating speech disorders has not been largely analysed. This study reviewed the literature regarding treatment intensity in speech disorders. METHOD A systematic search was conducted in four databases using appropriate search terms. Seven articles from a total of 580 met the inclusion criteria. The speech disorders investigated included speech sound disorders, dysarthria, acquired apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech. All seven studies were evaluated for their methodological quality, research phase and evidence level. RESULT Evidence level of reviewed studies ranged from moderate to strong. With regard to the research phase, only one study was considered to be phase III research, which corresponds to the controlled trial phase. The remaining studies were considered to be phase II research, which corresponds to the phase where magnitude of therapeutic effect is assessed. Results suggested that higher treatment intensity was favourable over lower treatment intensity of specific treatment technique(s) for treating childhood apraxia of speech and speech sound (phonological) disorders. CONCLUSION Future research should incorporate randomised-controlled designs to establish optimal treatment intensity that is specific to each of the speech disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Kaipa
- a Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater , OK , USA
| | - Abigail Marie Peterson
- a Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater , OK , USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Millard SK, Davis S. The Palin Parent Rating Scales: Parents' Perspectives of Childhood Stuttering and Its Impact. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2016; 59:950-963. [PMID: 27636859 DOI: 10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-14-0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 12/13/2015] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study is to explore the psychometric properties of the Parent Rating Scales-V1 (S. K. Millard, S. Edwards, & F. M. Cook, 2009), an assessment tool for parents of children who stutter, and to refine the measure accordingly. METHOD We included 259 scales completed prior to therapy. An exploratory factor analysis determined the test constructs and identified the items that had greatest loadings on those factors. Items that did not load on the factors were removed, and normative scores calculated. RESULTS The resulting 19-item questionnaire measures three factors: (a) the impact of stuttering on the child; (b) the severity of stuttering and its impact on the parents; and (c) the parents' knowledge about stuttering and confidence in managing it. Reliability was demonstrated, norms established, and an automated online version constructed. CONCLUSIONS The Palin Parent Rating Scale is a valid and reliable tool, providing a method of exploring parents' perceptions of stuttering, the impact it has on the child and themselves, and the parents' knowledge of and confidence in managing the stuttering. This is an important addition to the existing range of assessments that may be used to evaluate stuttering in children up to age 14;6 (years;months) and allows the wider targets of parent-led therapy programs to be evaluated.
Collapse
|
49
|
Gierut JA, Morrisette ML, Dickinson SL. Effect Size for Single-Subject Design in Phonological Treatment. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2015; 58:1464-81. [PMID: 26184118 PMCID: PMC4686307 DOI: 10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-14-0299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2014] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/12/2015] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to document, validate, and corroborate effect size (ES) for single-subject design in treatment of children with functional phonological disorders; to evaluate potential child-specific contributing variables relative to ES; and to establish benchmarks for interpretation of ES for the population. METHOD Data were extracted from the Developmental Phonologies Archive for 135 preschool children with phonological disorders who previously participated in single-subject experimental treatment studies. Standard mean difference(all with correction for continuity) was computed to gauge the magnitude of generalization gain that accrued longitudinally from treatment for each child with the data aggregated for purposes of statistical analyses. RESULTS ES ranged from 0.09 to 27.83 for the study population. ES was positively correlated with conventional measures of phonological learning and visual inspection of learning data on the basis of procedures standard to single-subject design. ES was linked to children's performance on diagnostic assessments of phonology but not other demographic characteristics or related linguistic skills and nonlinguistic skills. Benchmarks for interpretation of ES were estimated as 1.4, 3.6, and 10.1 for small, medium, and large learning effects, respectively. CONCLUSION Findings have utility for single-subject research and translation of research to evidence-based practice for children with phonological disorders.
Collapse
|
50
|
Bothe Marcotte A, Santus NM. A Research-Based Clinical Tutorial in Adolescent Stuttering: Response to Coleman, Miller, and Weidner (2015). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1044/ffd25.2.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Coleman, Miller, and Weidner's (2015) recent clinical vignette and tutorial described one very common, broad-based, and theory-driven approach to treating stuttering in a 14-year-old boy. This response suggests that methods based on prolonged speech are better supported in our research literature; are effective, efficient, and well-received by clients; and allow clinicians using the principles of evidence-based practice to address and solve the concerns that clients have raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bothe Marcotte
- Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia
Athens, GA
| | - Nina M. Santus
- Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia
Athens, GA
| |
Collapse
|