A progestin antagonist blocks vaginocervical stimulation-induced fos expression in neurones containing progestin receptors in the rostral medial preoptic area

FOS, a Critical Downstream Mediator of PGR and EGF Signaling Necessary for Ovulatory Prostaglandins in the Human Ovary

Context

Fos null mice failed to ovulate and form a corpus luteum (CL) even when given exogenous gonadotropins, suggesting that ovarian Fos expression is critical for successful ovulation and CL formation. However, little is known about FOS in the human ovary.

Objectives

To determine the expression, regulation, and function of FOS in human periovulatory follicles.

Design/Participants

Timed periovulatory follicles were obtained from normally cycling women. Granulosa/lutein cells were collected from in vitro fertilization patients.

Main Outcome Measures

The in vivo expression after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and in vitro regulation of FOS, JUN, JUNB, and JUND was evaluated at the mRNA and protein level. Binding of progesterone receptor (PGR) and FOS to their target genes was assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and progesterone were measured.

Results

The expression of FOS, JUNB, and JUND drastically increased in ovulatory follicles after hCG administration. In human granulosa/lutein cell cultures, hCG increased the expression of FOS and JUN proteins. Inhibitors of PGR and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors reduced hCG-induced increases in the expression and phosphorylation of FOS. PGR bound to the FOS gene. A selective FOS inhibitor blocked hCG-induced increases in PGE2 and the expression of prostaglandin (PG) synthases and transporters (PTGES, SLCO2A1, and ABCC1). FOS bound to the promoter regions of these genes.

Conclusions

The increase of FOS/activator protein 1 in human periovulatory follicles after hCG administration is mediated by collaborative actions of PGR and EGF signaling and critical for the upregulated expression of key ovulatory genes required for the rise in ovulatory PG in human granulosa cells.

Dynamics of progesterone and estrogen receptor alpha in the ventromedial hypothalamus

Cyclic fluctuations of estradiol and progesterone in females influence neuronal activity in the ventrolateral division of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMNvl), through the activation of progesterone receptors (PRs) and estrogen receptors (ERs). The expression of ER and PR in the VMNvl is influenced by their cognate ligands and is a central upstream trigger in the pathway of VMNvl-dependent modulation of endocrine responses. By studying the role played by estradiol and progesterone in PR and ERa expression in the VMNvl along the estrous cycle and how the two receptors interact in the same neuron, we aim to evaluate the synergistic action of both ovarian hormones in the regulation of VMNvl activity. In animals at all phases of the estrous cycle, the number of VMN neurons expressing PR or ERa was estimated by stereological methods, and the percentage, and rostro-caudal distribution, of neurons simultaneously expressing both receptors was determined. The highest number of PR-immunoreactive neurons was seen at proestrus, and of ERa-immunoreactive neurons was seen at proestrus and metestrus. The ERa/PR co-localization is increased at caudal levels. Approximately half the neurons expressing PR co-express ERa, a proportion that stays constant along the estrous cycle. The percentage of ERa neurons co-expressing PR changes from 60% at proestrus to 40% at metestrus. Fluctuations in circulating ovarian hormone levels promote coordinated changes in PR and ERa expression and co-localization. This may be an important mechanism in the regulation of input relayed by the VMNvl, allowing a precise modulation of endocrine responses.

Dopaminergic activation of estrogen receptors induces fos expression within restricted regions of the neonatal female rat brain

Steroid receptor activation in the developing brain influences a variety of cellular processes that endure into adulthood, altering both behavior and physiology. Recent data suggests that dopamine can regulate expression of progestin receptors within restricted regions of the developing rat brain by activating estrogen receptors in a ligand-independent manner. It is unclear whether changes in neuronal activity induced by dopaminergic activation of estrogen receptors are also region specific. To investigate this question, we examined where the dopamine D1-like receptor agonist, SKF 38393, altered Fos expression via estrogen receptor activation. We report that dopamine D1-like receptor agonist treatment increased Fos protein expression within many regions of the developing female rat brain. More importantly, prior treatment with an estrogen receptor antagonist partially reduced D1-like receptor agonist-induced Fos expression only within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the central amygdala. These data suggest that dopaminergic activation of estrogen receptors alters neuronal activity within restricted regions of the developing rat brain. This implies that ligand-independent activation of estrogen receptors by dopamine might organize a unique set of behaviors during brain development in contrast to the more wide spread ligand activation of estrogen receptors by estrogen.

Co-regulation of female sexual behavior and pregnancy induction: an exploratory synthesis

This paper will review both new and old data that address the question of whether brain mechanisms involved in reproductive function act in a coordinated way to control female sexual behavior and the induction of pregnancy/pseudopregnancy (P/PSP) by vaginocervical stimulation. Although it is clear that female sexual behavior, including pacing behavior, is important for induction of P/PSP, there has been no concerted effort to examine whether or how common mechanisms may control both functions. Because initiation of P/PSP requires that the female receive vaginocervical stimulation, central mechanisms controlling P/PSP may be modulated by or interactive with those that control female sexual behavior. This paper presents a synthesis of the literature and recent data from our lab for the purpose of examining whether there are interactions between behavioral and neuroendocrine mechanisms which reciprocally influence both reproductive functions.

Progestin receptors: neuronal integrators of hormonal and environmental stimulation

Although it originally was believed that neuronal steroid hormone receptors require binding to cognate ligand for activation, more recent evidence suggests that the receptors can be activated indirectly by other compounds, such as neurotransmitters and growth factors, acting through their own membrane receptors and specific intracellular signaling pathways. For example, as is the case with facilitation of sexual behavior by progesterone, facilitation of sexual behavior by D(1)/D(5) dopamine receptor agonists is blocked by disruption of progestin receptors. Therefore, some dopamine agonists facilitate sexual behavior at least in part by a progestin receptor-dependent mechanism, as does progesterone. This "ligand-independent activation" of neuronal progestin receptors is not limited to dopamine agonists; a variety of other compounds, as well as mating stimulation, facilitate sexual receptivity by a progestin receptor-dependent process. Steroid hormone receptors also can be regulated by afferent input in another way. Various neurotransmitters upregulate or downregulate steroid hormone receptors in some neurons. This, in turn, presumably confers greater or decreased sensitivity to the particular factors that can activate the particular steroid receptor in those particular neurons. Therefore, steroid hormones are but one class of factors that can regulate and activate steroid hormone receptors. Some additional factors that activate steroid hormone receptors have been identified, as have some factors that can regulate concentrations of receptors. Relatively little is known at this time about the range of neurotransmitters, humoral factors, and intracellular signaling pathways that are involved.

Minireview: Neuronal steroid hormone receptors: they're not just for hormones anymore

The ovarian steroid hormones have numerous effects on the brain, many of which are mediated, at least in part, by interaction with intracellular steroid hormone receptors acting as regulators of transcription. These intracellular steroid hormone receptors have often been considered to be activated solely by cognate hormone. However, during the past decade, numerous studies have shown that the receptors can be activated by neurotransmitters and intracellular signaling systems, through a process that does not require hormone. Although most of these have been in vitro experiments, others have been in vivo. Evidence from a wide variety of tissues and cells suggests that steroid hormone receptors are transcription factors that can be activated by a wide variety of factors, only one of which is cognate hormone. Furthermore, ligand-independent activation of neural steroid hormone receptors, rather than being a pharmacological or in vitro curiosity, seems to be a process that occurs in the normal physiology of animals. Thinking of steroid hormone receptors only as ligand-activated proteins may constrain our thinking about the many factors that may activate the receptors and cause receptor-dependent changes in neural gene expression and neuroendocrine function.

Estrogen-receptor-? distribution in the human hypothalamus: Similarities and differences with ER? distribution

This study reports the first systematic rostrocaudal distribution of estrogen receptor beta immunoreactivity (ER beta-ir) in the human hypothalamus and adjacent areas in five males and five females between 20-39 years of age and compares its distribution to previously reported ER alpha in the same patients. ER beta-ir was generally observed more frequently in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus and appeared to be stronger in women. Basket-like fiber stainings, suggestive for ER beta-ir in synaptic terminals, were additionally observed in various areas. Men showed more robust nuclear ER beta-ir than women in the medial part of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, paraventricular and paratenial nucleus of the thalamus, while less intense, but more nuclear, ER beta-ir appeared to be present in, e.g., the BSTc, sexually dimorphic nucleus of the medial preoptic area, diagonal band of Broca and ventromedial nucleus. Women revealed more nuclear ER beta-ir than men of a low to intermediate level, e.g., in the suprachiasmatic, supraoptic, paraventricular, infundibular, and medial mamillary nucleus. These data indicate potential sex differences in ER beta expression. ER beta-ir expression patterns in subjects with abnormal hormone levels suggests that there may be sex differences in ER beta-ir that are "activational" rather than "organizational" in nature. Similarities, differences, potential functional, and clinical implications of the observed ER alpha and ER beta distributions are discussed in relation to reproduction, autonomic-function, mood, cognition, and neuroprotection in health and disease.

Response of ERalpha-IR and ERbeta-IR cells in the forebrain of female rats to mating stimuli

Sexual behavior in female rats depends on the action of estradiol on estrogen receptors (ERs) found in particular brain regions. While hormonal regulation of female sexual behavior requires ERalpha, the possible functions of ERbeta remain to be clarified. Mating stimulation has several behavioral and physiological consequences and induces Fos expression in many brain areas involved in the regulation of reproductive behavior and physiology. In addition, some cells in which mating induces Fos expression coexpress ERalpha. To determine whether cells in which Fos is induced by a particular mating stimulus coexpress ERalpha, ERbeta, or both, we used a triple-label immunofluorescent technique to visualize ERalpha-, ERbeta-, and mating-induced Fos-immunoreactivity (Fos-ir) in neurons in which mating stimulation reliably increases Fos expression. Ovariectomized, hormone-primed rats were either unmated, received 15 mounts, or received 15 intromissions. In the rostral medial preoptic area, Fos-ir was induced by mounts alone primarily in cells coexpressing ERalpha-ir, while Fos-ir was induced by intromissions mainly in cells coexpressing both ERalpha-ir and ERbeta-ir (ERalpha/ERbeta-ir). In the dorsal part of the posterodorsal medial amygdala, Fos-ir was induced by intromissions in cells coexpressing ERalpha-ir and ERalpha/ERbeta-ir. However, in the ventral part of the posterodorsal medial amygdala, Fos-ir was induced by intromissions primarily in cells coexpressing only ERbeta-ir. These data suggest that qualitatively different sexual stimuli may be integrated through distinct ER-containing circuits in the rostral medial preoptic area and posterodorsal medial amygdala. The diversity in coexpression of type of ER in cells in different brain areas after various mating stimuli suggests a role for both ERalpha and ERbeta in the integration of hormonal information and information related to mating stimuli.

Response to male odours in progestin receptor- and oestrogen receptor-containing cells in female rat brain

Sensory cues from male rats, such as odours and vaginal-cervical stimulation (VCS), play a modulatory role in female rat sexual behaviour. For example, exposure to male odours and VCS appears to be at least partially responsible for increases in sexual behaviour following repeated mating of oestradiol-primed female rats. Although there is evidence that VCS influences sexual behaviour via a ligand-independent progestin receptor (PR)-dependent mechanism, the mechanism by which odours influence sexual behaviour is not known. We tested the hypothesis that, similar to VCS, the effects of male odours on sexual behaviour are mediated by progestin receptors. Female rats were injected with the progestin antagonist, RU486, or oil vehicle and were then exposed to male-soiled bedding or clean bedding. Although exposure to male-soiled bedding resulted in higher levels of Fos immunoreactivity in brain areas associated with female sexual behaviour, the progestin antagonist did not reduce this effect. Furthermore, there was minimal coexpression of odour-induced Fos and progestin receptors in brain areas associated with female sexual behaviour. Together, these results suggest that the effects of male odours are not mediated by a PR-dependent mechanism. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that oestrogen receptor (ER)-containing cells are involved in the effects of olfactory cues. Although there was virtually no coexpression of ERbeta and odour-induced Fos in brain areas associated with female sexual behaviour, exposure to male odours slightly increased the number of cells coexpressing ER(alpha) and odour-induced Fos in the posterodorsal medial amygdala. Although, these results do not support the hypothesis that the effects of odours are mediated by a PR-dependent mechanism, they suggest that integration of male odours and hormonal cues may occur in ER(alpha)-containing cells in the posterodorsal medial amygdala.