Adverse events in patients treated with 5-aminosalicyclic acid: 1993-1994 pharmacovigilance report for Pentasa in France

The oft-overlooked cardiovascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with several extraintestinal comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chronic inflammation is recognized as an important factor in atherogenesis, thrombosis, and myocarditis.

AREAS COVERED

IBD patients may be at increased risk for developing early atherosclerosis, cardiovascular events, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, myocarditis, and arrhythmias. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and thiopurines have been shown to have a protective effect against acute arterial events, but more research is needed. However, an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and major cardiovascular events has been described with the use of Janus kinase inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

CVD risk is slightly increased in patients with IBD, especially during flares. Thromboprophylaxis is strongly recommended in hospitalized patients with active disease as the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the risk of bleeding. The pathogenetic relationship between CVD and IBD and the impact of IBD drugs on CVD outcomes are not fully elucidated. CVD risk doesn't have the strength to drive a specific IBD treatment. However, proper CVD risk profiling should always be done and the best strategy to manage CVD risk in IBD patients is to combine appropriate thromboprophylaxis with early and durable remission of the underlying IBD.

Myocarditis in systemic immune-mediated diseases: Prevalence, characteristics and prognosis. A systematic review

Many systemic immune-mediated diseases (SIDs) may involve the heart and present as myocarditis with different histopathological pictures, i.e. lymphocytic, eosinophilic, granulomatous, and clinical features, ranging from a completely asymptomatic patient to life-threatening cardiogenic shock or arrhythmias. Myocarditis can be part of some SIDs, such as sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, antiphospholipid syndrome, dermato-polymyositis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and other vasculitis syndromes, but also of some organ-based immune-mediated diseases with systemic expression, such as chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of this review is to describe the prevalence, main clinical characteristics and prognosis of myocarditis associated with SIDs.

Mesalamine in the Initial Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disorder of intestinal inflammation and includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The goal of therapy is to induce and maintain remission, which is achieved with conventional therapies. Mesalamine is considered a first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials have confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Doses of more than 2.4 g/d achieve significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission, with a decreased risk of relapse. Serious adverse effects are rare, but nonadherence is common. Mesalamine is considered safe in pregnancy, excluding formulations with dibutyl phthalate.

A Case of Right-Sided Ulcerative Colitis with Mesalamine-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions

BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, affecting the colon continuously from the rectum proximally. However, a clinical type with right-sided colitis sparing the anal side of the colon is also known. Mesalamine, which is generally used to treat UC, can rarely aggravate the disease. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old woman with no history of colonic diseases visited our hospital because of a positive fecal occult blood test. The first colonoscopy showed inflamed and edematous mucosa extending from the ascending colon to the right-half of the transverse colon. Colonic biopsy specimens demonstrated infiltrations of chronic inflammatory cells in the mucosa and crypt abscesses, but no epithelioid granulomas, compatible with UC. She was highly positive for PR3-ANCA, confirming the diagnosis of UC. After starting mesalamine, she had hypersensitivity reactions and aggravations of UC, which were confirmed endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS Right-sided colitis may be a subgroup of UC, and this is the first report of this type of disease complicated by aggravation due to mesalamine hypersensitivity.

The safety of non-biological treatments in Ulcerative Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with a relapsing-remitting course that determines significant morbidity and can associate with local complications and/or extra-intestinal manifestations. Pharmacological therapies are often required for a lifetime with possible risks of toxicity and side effects. Areas covered: Non-biological therapies (i.e. aminosalicylates, corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs) are widely used in UC patients for controlling the active phases of the disease and maintaining remission. Expert Opinion: Aminosalycilates have a good safety profile with a low risk of idiosyncrasic reactions. In contrast, the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs can associate with unacceptable side effects, some of which are potentially life threatening. Mechanisms underlying the development of these side effects are not fully understood and strategies aimed to prevent them have not yet been standardized. However, clinicians should monitor the patients during therapy to recognize the adverse events at an early stage of the occurrence. New drugs that selectively target molecules involved in the amplification of the ongoing mucosal inflammation are currently under investigation. Preliminary data indicate that such compounds have better overall safety and tolerability than corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs.

5-Aminosalicylic Acid-Associated Myocarditis and Pericarditis: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Use of medications containing the 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) moiety may cause a rare but potentially lethal side effect involving inflammation of the heart (myocarditis) or pericardium (pericarditis) or both (myopericarditis). Early recognition of 5-ASA as the cause is important to prevent progression of the inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinicians with information to assist in recognizing the signs and symptoms of 5-ASA-induced cardiac inflammation and the characteristics of the suspected therapy, and in determining the appropriate approach to treatment.

DATA SOURCES STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The Embase database was searched, for the period 1974 to July 17, 2015, for published descriptions of cases of cardiac inflammation caused by 5-ASA-containing medications. The search terms included the names of specific agents, as well as terms for different types of cardiac inflammation. Articles in any language were retained for inclusion in this narrative review.

FINDINGS

There is no symptom, sign, laboratory test, or constellation of symptoms and signs that is pathognomonic for 5-ASA-induced myocardial-pericardial toxicity. Similarly, there is no single laboratory, electrocardiographic, or echocardiographic finding or combination of findings that implicates 5-ASA as the cause of nonspecific symptoms. However, most patients present with chest pain, shortness of breath, and fever within the first 28 days after initiating 5-ASA. Physical examination, electrocardiography, and diagnostic imaging will yield findings consistent with myocarditis, with or without accompanying pericarditis. Prompt discontinuation of the 5-ASA will result in resolution of symptoms within days, without the need for any adjunctive therapies. Rechallenge with any 5-ASA-containing compound carries a high risk for recurrence of the inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Any patient presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath, or fever within 28 days after initiating a 5-ASA-containing drug should be considered as exhibiting drug-induced inflammation. The 5-ASA-containing drug should be stopped immediately until other causes can be proven (or excluded); if no other cause is discovered, the 5-ASA should not be restarted.

Probing the Association of Pancreatitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been increasingly diagnosed in children and adults. Similarly, acute and chronic pancreatitis are increasingly prevalent conditions with potentially devastating consequences. There is a growing body of literature linking these 2 conditions. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive outline of the association between IBD and pancreatitis and to explore their putative pathophysiology. Based on the collective reports, 2 outstanding reasons for pancreatitis in patients with IBD are medications and IBD complications.

Relationship between azathioprine dosage, 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels, and therapeutic response in pediatric patients with IBD treated with azathioprine

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine (AZA) is commonly used to treat IBD either alone or in combination with mesalazine. However, there are relatively few studies concerning the relationship between AZA dose, thiopurine metabolite levels, and therapeutic response in pediatric patients treated with both AZA and mesalazine.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the relationship between AZA dose, thiopurine metabolite levels, and therapeutic response in 137 pediatric patients with IBD treated with AZA using multilevel analysis. Additional factors affecting metabolite levels and therapeutic response were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A positive correlation was observed between AZA dosage and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) level (P < 0.0001). Variant TPMT genotype (P < 0.001) and concomitant use of mesalazine (P < 0.001) were predictors of higher 6-TGN levels. Leukopenia (P = 0.025) and lymphopenia (P = 0.045) were associated with higher levels of 6-TGN. Poor AZA compliance affected median 6-TGN levels (P < 0.001). The frequency of patients with median 6-TGN levels >235 pmol per 8 × 10(8) red blood cells was the highest in the sustained therapeutic response group (P = 0.015). Age, sex, IBD type, and duration of AZA therapy did not influence 6-TGN levels or therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

AZA dosage is positively correlated with 6-TGN level. Higher 6-TGN levels are related to leukopenia, lymphopenia, and concurrent use of mesalazine. These results provide the rationale for monitoring metabolites to optimize drug dosing and minimize drug-related toxicity. In addition, maintenance of 6-TGN levels within a beneficial therapeutic range by direct monitoring should be helpful in attaining therapeutic efficacy, although this possibility should be verified in prospective studies.

Five-aminosalicylic Acid: an update for the reappraisal of an old drug

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprises several conditions with chronic or recurring immune response and inflammation of the gastrointestinal apparatus, of which ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the commonest forms. This disease has a significant prevalence and it is of an unknown aethiology. Five-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and its derivatives are among the oldest drugs approved for the treatment of the IBD. In this review we reapprise aspects of 5-ASA mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy that in our opinion make it a valuable drug that can be fruitfully tailored in personalised treatments as a therapeutic option alongside other immune-modifying agents.

Mesalamine treatment mimicking relapse in a child with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

There are reports on mesalamine-induced bloody diarrhea mimicking ulcerative colitis (UC) relapse, mostly in adults.

METHODS

Herein we present a case of a child with UC who developed relapse of hemorrhagic colitis related to mesalamine.

RESULTS

A 10-year-old girl developed severe symptoms mimicking UC relapse 3 weeks after introduction of mesalamine therapy. After mesalamine was withdrawn, her symptoms improved, but deteriorated again during the challenge of mesalamine despite concomitant use of corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case report on such a young child during the concomitant use of corticosteroids.

Liver Function Test Abnormalities in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Hospital-based Survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are frequently associated with altered liver function tests (LFTs). The causal relationship between abnormal LFTs and IBD is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and etiology of LFTs abnormalities and their association with clinical variables in a cohort of IBD patients followed up in a single center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive IBD in- and outpatients routinely followed up at a single referral center. Clinical and demographic parameters were recorded. Subjects were excluded if they had a previous diagnosis of chronic liver disease. LFT abnormality was defined as an increase in aspartate aminotransferase, (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), or total bilirubin.

RESULTS

A cohort of 335 patients (179 males, mean age 46.0 ± 15.6 years) was analyzed. Abnormal LFTs were detected in 70 patients (20.9%). In most cases, the alterations were mild and spontaneously returned to normal values in about 60% of patients. Patients with abnormal LFTs were less frequently on treatment with aminosalicylates (22.8 vs. 36.6%, P = 0.04). The most frequent cause for transient abnormal LFTs was drug-induced cholestasis (34.1%), whereas fatty liver was the most frequent cause of persistent liver damage (65.4%). A cholestatic pattern was found in 60.0% of patients and was mainly related to older age, longer duration of disease, and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of LFT abnormalities is relatively high in IBD patients, but the development of severe liver injury is exceptional. Moreover, most alterations of LFTs are mild and spontaneously return to normal values. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and fatty liver are the most relevant causes of abnormal LFTs in patients with IBD.

Liver Function Test Abnormalities in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Hospital-based Survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are frequently associated with altered liver function tests (LFTs). The causal relationship between abnormal LFTs and IBD is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and etiology of LFTs abnormalities and their association with clinical variables in a cohort of IBD patients followed up in a single center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive IBD in- and outpatients routinely followed up at a single referral center. Clinical and demographic parameters were recorded. Subjects were excluded if they had a previous diagnosis of chronic liver disease. LFT abnormality was defined as an increase in aspartate aminotransferase, (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), or total bilirubin.

RESULTS

A cohort of 335 patients (179 males, mean age 46.0 ± 15.6 years) was analyzed. Abnormal LFTs were detected in 70 patients (20.9%). In most cases, the alterations were mild and spontaneously returned to normal values in about 60% of patients. Patients with abnormal LFTs were less frequently on treatment with aminosalicylates (22.8 vs. 36.6%, P = 0.04). The most frequent cause for transient abnormal LFTs was drug-induced cholestasis (34.1%), whereas fatty liver was the most frequent cause of persistent liver damage (65.4%). A cholestatic pattern was found in 60.0% of patients and was mainly related to older age, longer duration of disease, and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of LFT abnormalities is relatively high in IBD patients, but the development of severe liver injury is exceptional. Moreover, most alterations of LFTs are mild and spontaneously return to normal values. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and fatty liver are the most relevant causes of abnormal LFTs in patients with IBD.

Isolated fever induced by mesalamine treatment

Adverse reactions to mesalamine, a treatment used to induce and maintain remission in inflammatory bowel diseases, particularly ulcerative colitis, have been described in the literature as case reports. This case illustrates an unusual adverse reaction. Our patient developed an isolated fever of unexplained etiology, which was found to be related to mesalamine treatment. A 22-year-old patient diagnosed with ulcerative colitis developed a fever with rigors and anorexia 10 d after starting oral mesalamine while his colitis was clinically resolving. Testing revealed no infection. A mesalamine-induced fever was considered, and treatment was stopped, which led to spontaneous resolution of the fever. The diagnosis was confirmed by reintroducing the mesalamine. One year later, this side effect was noticed again in the same patient after he was administered topical mesalamine. This reaction to mesalamine seems to be idiosyncratic, and the mechanism that induces fever remains unclear. Fever encountered in the course of a mesalamine treatment in ulcerative colitis must be considered a mesalamine-induced fever when it cannot be explained by the disease activity, an associated extraintestinal manifestation, or an infectious etiology.

Efficacy and safety of Fufangkushen colon-coated capsule in the treatment of ulcerative colitis compared with mesalazine: a double-blinded and randomized study

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Fufangkushen colon-coated capsule (FCC) was a newly developed herbal drug for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern of damp-heat accumulating in the interior.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of FCC in the treatment of active UC compared with Huidi (HD, mesalazine enteric-coated tablets) were evaluated in a double-blinded and randomized clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, randomized and controlled study, 320 active UC patients with TCM pattern of damp-heat accumulating in the interior were assigned to two groups: 240 treated with FCC plus HD placebo treatment, 80 with HD plus FCC placebo. The drugs and their corresponding placebos were administrated at advised dosage for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was a positive clinical response at week 8, and Mayo scoring system was employed for assessment of UC activity.

RESULTS

At the 8th week, 72.50% of patients in FCC group (170 of 234) and 65.00% of patients in HD group (52 of 80) had achieved a clinical response. There was no statistically significance between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The proportions of patients who had a clinical remission was similar in 2 groups (41.50% in FCC group, 41.25% in HD group, P>0.05), mucosal healing rate at week 8 in the two groups were also without significant difference (55.13% in FCC group, 55.00% in HD group, P>0.05). Mayo scores at week 8 showed no statistically difference in the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the safety profiles of the 2 groups (P>0.05). No severe AEs were reported in either group. The latent class analysis indicated that FCC was superior applicable for the left hemicolon involved patients than HD.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HD, a mesalamine enteric-coated tablet, FCC is similarly effective and safe in the treatment of active UC with TCM pattern of damp-heat accumulation interior pattern. In addition, FCC indicates superior effect in the treatment of UC with inflamed area of the left hemicolon than HD.

Mesalamine in the treatment and maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the GI tract that is characterized by mucosal inflammation in the colon. Mesalamine (mesalazine) is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the first-line treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate UC. There are multiple formulations of mesalamine available, primarily differentiated by their means of delivering active mesalamine to the colon. Mesalamine has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials to induce both clinical response and remission, and maintain clinical remission, in these patients. It has few serious adverse effects and is generally well tolerated by patients. The main areas of uncertainty with use of mesalamine in patients with UC center on the optimal dose for induction of response, how to maintain patient adherence and the role of mesalamine in cancer chemoprophylaxis. Generic forms of mesalamine have yet to be approved by regulatory bodies in the USA.

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease

Conservative management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is based on a combination of drugs, including aminosalicylates (ASAs), steroids, antibiotics, immunosuppressives and biologic agents. Although various side effects have been related to treatment regimens, drug-induced nephrotoxicity is rather uncommon. Furthermore, it is often underestimated since renal function deterioration may be attributed to the underlying disease. The nephrotoxicity of ASAs and cyclosporine A seems well established, but recent data have suggested a possible role of biologic agents such as infliximab and adalimubab in renal impairment. The aim of this review is to summarize the nephrotoxic effects of medical treatment as well as to express possible caveats in the administration of novel agents in IBD.

Exacerbation of bloody diarrhea as a side effect of mesalamine treatment of active ulcerative colitis

Mesalamine has been used as the first-line therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) because of its efficacy and fewer side effects. However, earlier study showed that mesalamine occasionally causes diarrhea. We are presenting a patient with active UC in whom bloody diarrhea accompanied by abdominal pain and fever occurred and the symptoms were aggravated after administration of mesalamine. In order to clarify the reason of symptoms aggravation, drug lymphocyte stimulation test and rechallenge trial with mesalamine were performed. The results indicated the possibility that aggravation was related to allergic reaction and was dose-dependent. Furthermore, we examined colonoscopic views but there was no remarkable change in before and after rechallenge trial. Based on the above result, the patient was diagnosed with mesalamine intolerance. In order to differentiate whether the exacerbation of bloody diarrhea is due to the side effects of the mesalamine or a true relapse of UC, taking careful history before and after increasing mesalamine dosage as well as being aware of side effects of mesalamine are required. Clinicians should be aware of diarrhea as a side effect of mesalamine particularly after onset of mesalamine formulation, change in mesalamine formulation, or change in mesalamine dose.

Renal manifestations and complications of inflammatory bowel disease

Renal manifestations and complications are not rare in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and may present as nephrolithiasis, amyloidosis, tubulointerstitial nephritis, and glomerulonephritis. Symptoms of renal impairment are not always specific and since the underlying bowel disease is preponderant, renal function deterioration may be underestimated. Additionally, medical treatment of patients with IBD such as aminosalicylates, cyclosporine, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors can cause renal complications, although direct correlation to bowel disease is not always clear. The well-documented renal manifestations and complications of IBD, as well as the possible renal side effects of new drugs, emphasize the need for periodic evaluation of renal function. New markers of renal function may facilitate early diagnosis and unravel the complex mechanisms responsible for kidney damage. The purpose of this review is to summarize the renal manifestations and complications as well as the markers of renal function utilized in IBD, attempting to shed more light on the pathophysiology of renal damage in IBD.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis related to medications commonly used in gastroenterology

BACKGROUND

With the growing number of pharmacological agents available nowadays, the gastrointestinal drug-induced side effects become more common than ever. However, drug-induced pancreatitis belongs to rather seldom reported adverse drug reactions, probably because of the difficulty in proving the relationship between an inflammation of the pancreas and the pharmacotherapy with a certain drug.

AIM

The aim of this review is to draw attention to an infrequent but real problem of drug-induced acute pancreatitis associated with medications commonly used in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders.

METHODOLOGY

For the purpose of that the PubMed database was searched using the keywords "drug-induced pancreatitis", "drug-associated pancreatitis", "acute pancreatitis", "pancreatitis" in various combinations and relevant literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

A substantial number of drugs commonly prescribed for gastrointestinal disorders are known to cause acute pancreatitis. Case reports and review articles published so far draw attention to medications already known to cause drug-induced pancreatic damage as well as implicate new drugs. Generally, the etiopathological mechanisms involved in drug-induced pancreatitis remain unclear. It is difficult to establish or rule out definitely such unwanted event, especially in patients taking numerous medications prescribed for multiple comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacological agents are among etiologic factors that should be considered in all patients presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with acute pancreatitis. The diagnosis of drug-induced AP is often difficult to established. Therefore a high index of suspicion and thorough drug history are crucial for making the final diagnosis.

Effect of 5-aminosalicylates on renal function in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 4-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Nephrotoxicity has been described in some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA). Our aim was to conduct a retrospective study of IBD patients, both with and without 5-ASA treatment, who underwent regular evaluation of renal function over a 4-year period.

METHODS

Serum creatinine was measured before the start of 5-ASA therapy, and thereafter yearly up to 4 years. Creatinine clearance (Cl(Cr)) was estimated from serum creatinine (Cockroft and Gault formula). The influence of 5-ASA treatment on renal function was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 150 IBD patients (ulcerative colitis in 45%, Crohn's disease in 55%) were included. Sixty-two patients were receiving 5-ASAs (95% coated mesalazine, mean dose 1.9 +/- 0.8 g/day). Both serum creatinine levels and ClCr were similar in patients with and without 5-ASA treatment, and remained stable throughout the 4-year follow-up in patients taking 5-ASAs. In the multivariate analysis, 5-ASA treatment (or its dose) was not correlated with serum creatinine levels or Cl(Cr). No interstitial nephritis was reported during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

5-ASA-related renal disease was not found in our series, suggesting that the occurrence of renal impairment in IBD patients receiving these drugs is exceptional. Our results do not support the recommendation of serum creatinine monitoring in patients receiving 5-ASA treatment.

Acute pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease, with special reference to azathioprine-induced pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is a potentially severe condition. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) seem to be at increased risk for acute pancreatitis.

AIM

To describe the incidence, main causes and possible predictive factors of acute pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Information was retrospectively extracted from the clinical records of patients followed in the IBD Units of nine hospitals in Madrid (n = 5073).

RESULTS

A total of 82 acute pancreatitis episodes were diagnosed (cumulative incidence, 1.6%); 98% of them were mild. Recurrent acute pancreatitis developed in 13% of patients. Most cases of acute pancreatitis (63.4%) were attributed to drug exposure [azathioprine/mercaptopurine (AZA/MP) n = 46, mesalazine (mesalamine) n = 6]; 20.7% were idiopathic, and 12.2% were biliary. Incidence of acute pancreatitis in patients treated with AZA/MP was 3.1%. In patients with acute pancreatitis, female gender (OR 3.4 95% CI: 1.3-9.3; P = 0.012) and Crohn's disease (CD) (OR 5.8 95% CI: 1.6-20.6; P = 0.007) were risk factors for AZA/MP-associated acute pancreatitis, the latter also when analysed only in patients treated with AZA/MP (n = 1477) (OR 5.2 95% CI: 1.8-14; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of acute pancreatitis in our IBD patients (1.6%) is similar to that previously described. Drugs, mainly AZA/MP, are the leading cause. AZA-induced acute pancreatitis is always mild. Patients with CD are at a higher risk for AZA/MP-associated acute pancreatitis. The frequency of idiopathic acute pancreatitis is higher than expected, suggesting that part of these cases could be extraintestinal manifestations of IBD.

Mesalamine with MMX technology for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Mesalamine with MMX Multi Matrix System technology (hereafter referred to as MMX mesalamine) is an oral, high-strength (1.2 g/tablet), once-daily formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. This new formulation has been designed to provide delayed and prolonged 5-aminosalicylic acid release throughout the colon. In recent clinical studies, MMX mesalamine (taken as a once-daily dose of 2.4 or 4.8 g) effectively induced clinical remission and mucosal healing versus placebo in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Once remission was achieved, MMX mesalamine effectively maintained disease remission in the majority of patients for at least 12 months. In this paper, we comprehensively review the results of studies exploring the clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety of MMX mesalamine in patients with ulcerative colitis, and examine the implications of these findings on clinical practice.

Is once-daily mesalazine equivalent to the currently used twice-daily regimen? A study performed in 30 healthy volunteers

A randomized, 2-way, crossover study was conducted in 30 volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of a new once-daily dosing regimen of mesalazine (1 x 4 g/d) with the current twice-daily dosage (2 x 2 g/d) used in many European countries. The 2 dosages were administrated orally for 8 days, separated by a 2-week washout. Plasma concentrations of mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine were determined on days 1 and 8 by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method and C(max), t(max), and AUCs calculated. The bioequivalence was obtained for a 90% confidence interval of the AUC(0-24h) ratio (test/reference) for mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine on days 1 and 8, within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. The bioequivalence was demonstrated on day 1 for mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine and on day 8 for mesalazine. As it is desirable to offer patients a preparation with a less frequent administration to enhance compliance, this once-daily regimen may be an attractive dosing option.

5-Aminosalicylates and renal function in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Nephrotoxicity has been described in some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). Studies with 5-ASA treatment in which serum creatinine or creatinine clearance was measured regularly show that nephrotoxicity is exceptional (mean rate of only 0.26% per patient-year). There have been several case reports, including 46 patients, of renal disease associated with 5-ASA treatment in patients with IBD. 5-ASA treatment-related nephrotoxicity is reported most often within the first 12 months, but also delayed presentation after several years has been shown. The absence of a clear relationship between 5-ASA dose and the risk of nephrotoxicity suggests that this complication is idiosyncratic rather than dose-related. Most of the patients with renal disease associated with 5-ASA treatment suffered interstitial nephritis, with symptoms and signs being nonspecific, which may delay detection for many months. The nephrotoxicity potential of mesalazine and sulfasalazine seems to be similar. The risk with different oral preparations of 5-ASA is probably too small to influence the choice of agent. Mesalazine should be withdrawn when renal impairment manifests in a patient with IBD; if this does not result in a fall in serum creatinine, then renal biopsy should be considered. A trial of high-dose steroid may be recommended in patients whose renal function does not respond to drug withdrawal. The optimal monitoring schedule of serum creatinine in patients receiving 5-ASA treatment remains to be established, as there is no evidence to date that either the test, or the frequency of testing, improves patient outcomes.

The risks and the benefits of mesalazine as a treatment for ulcerative colitis

Mesalazine is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the primary treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In both oral and topical formulations it has demonstrated efficacy in both induction of active colitis and maintenance of remission, regardless of the extent of inflammation. In addition, there is indirect evidence of a role in the chemoprophylaxis of colorectal cancer in these patients. Mesalazine is generally well tolerated by patients, although serious adverse effects have been reported. In particular, worsening of colitis, interstitial pneumonitis and nephritis are of concern to clinicians. Fortunately these reactions are mostly reversible with cessation of therapy.

Abnormal hepatic biochemistries in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between abnormal hepatic biochemistries and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unclear. We determined the prevalence of abnormal hepatic biochemistries and chronic liver disease in a cohort of IBD patients, and we compared patients with normal and abnormal liver biochemistries.

METHODS

Patients with IBD evaluated at our institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000 were identified. Data on gender, age, IBD subtype, extent and activity, medications, liver disease history, liver biochemistries, and vital status were collected. The chi(2) test, Student's t-test, and Cox proportional regression were used.

RESULTS

We identified 544 patients with available hepatic biochemistries. Abnormal hepatic biochemistries were found in 159 (29%). Defined chronic liver disease was present in 5.8% of patients (primary sclerosing cholangitis in 4.6%). The prevalence of abnormal hepatic biochemistries was 27% for those with active IBD and 36% for those in remission (P= 0.06). Patients with abnormal hepatic biochemistries were less frequently on 5-aminosalicylates (35%vs 51%, P < 0.001), and a smaller proportion was alive at last follow-up (90.4%vs 98.5%, P < 0.0001). The age-adjusted risk of death was 4.8 times higher in patients with abnormal hepatic biochemistries, after excluding patients with any diagnosis of liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal hepatic biochemistries were present in nearly one-third of our patients, and surprisingly, they were not associated with IBD activity. Abnormal hepatic biochemistries and chronic liver disease appeared to have a negative impact on vital status. Persistently abnormal hepatic biochemistries should be evaluated, and not attributed to IBD activity.

Effect of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalamine (SPD476) for the induction of remission of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

SPD476 (MMX mesalamine), a novel, once-daily mesalamine formulation, uses MMX Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology to delay and extend delivery of active drug throughout the colon. We performed a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis received MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day given twice daily (n = 93), 4.8 g/day given once daily (n = 94), or placebo (n = 93) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in clinical and endoscopic remission (modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index score of < or =1, with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and at least a 1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score) at week 8. Patients with mucosal friability were not considered to have achieved this end point.

RESULTS

Clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 was achieved by 34.1% and 29.2% of patients receiving MMX mesalamine 2.4 g/day given twice daily and MMX mesalamine 4.8 g/day given once daily, respectively, versus 12.9% receiving placebo (P < .01). MMX mesalamine was generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

MMX mesalamine given once or twice daily is well-tolerated and, compared with placebo, demonstrated efficacy for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.

Indications for 5-aminosalicylate in inflammatory bowel disease: is the body of evidence complete?

Mesalazine is a safe drug, although adverse events may be seen in a minority of patients. This applies also to pregnant women and children. The role of mesalazine in combination therapy to improve efficacy and concomitant drug pharmacokinetics, or in chemoprevention against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related colonic carcinoma has not yet been completely elucidated. Therapeutic success of mesalazine may be optimized by a combination of high dose and low frequency of dosage to improve compliance. Therefore, due to its superior safety profile and pharmacokinetic characteristics, mesalazine is preferable to sulphasalazine. This paper reviews the literature concerning mechanisms of action, indications and off-label use, pharmacokinetic properties and formulations, therapeutic efficacy, compliance, paediatric indications, chemoprevention, and safety issues and adverse event profile of mesalazine treatment versus sulphasalazine. It also highlights these controversies in order to clarify the potential benefits of mesalazines in IBD therapy and evidence for its use.

Extraintestinal manifestations and complications in inflammatory bowel diseases

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) that often involve organs other than those of the gastrointestinal tract. These nonintestinal affections are termed extraintestinal symptoms. Differentiating the true extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases from secondary extraintestinal complications, caused by malnutrition, chronic inflammation or side effects of therapy, may be difficult. This review concentrates on frequency, clinical presentation and therapeutic implications of extraintestinal symptoms in inflammatory bowel diseases. If possible, extraintestinal manifestations are differentiated from extraintestinal complications. Special attention is given to the more recently described sites of involvement; i.e. thromboembolic events, osteoporosis, pulmonary involvement and affection of the central nervous system.

Review article: drug-induced microscopic colitis - proposal for a scoring system and review of the literature

The pathophysiology of microscopic colitis is unknown, although it is thought to be because of an abnormal immune reaction to luminal antigens in predisposed hosts. Specific antigens have not been proved, although various infectious triggers and drugs have been proposed. The responsibility of several drugs has been questioned, some with strong clinical and/or histological evidence suggesting causality. The issue of drug-induced microscopic colitis is important because of the burden of this disease. Thus, any case that can be cured by withdrawal of a drug must be identified. In this report, we propose a scoring system for drug-induced microscopic colitis, adapting existing criteria of drug causality, and review the literature using this framework. Based on this review, several drugs are identified with intermediate or high likelihood of inducing microscopic colitis. Finally, we suggest how to treat individual patients suspected of having drug-induced colitis according to the level of evidence for that particular drug.

Comparison of two different daily dosages (2.4 vs. 1.2 g) of oral mesalazine in maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis patients: 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine as maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis is used worldwide and has been proven to be effective. However, the optimal dosage remains to be defined.

AIM

To establish whether daily treatment with 2.4 g of oral mesalazine is more effective than 1.2 g in preventing disease relapse.

METHODS

A total of 156 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were randomly treated for 1 year with 2.4 (n = 80) or 1.2 (n = 76) g/day of mesalazine. Activity of disease was assessed by periodical clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations.

RESULTS

After 12 months, 24 of 80 patients (30%) on 2.4 g and 20 of 76 patients (26%) on 1.2 g were still in remission (P = N.S.). Patients in 2.4 g group remained in remission for a longer time than those in 1.2 g group (P < 0.001). Among clinical variables considered in the study, course of disease prior to enrollment (< or = 3 or > 3 relapses/year) was found to influence response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A daily dosage of 2.4 g of oral mesalazine seems to better at preventing and delaying relapses of ulcerative colitis than 1.2 g. The course of disease seems to be crucial in choosing the optimal dosage of mesalazine in a maintenance regimen.

Mesalamine derivatives in the treatment of Crohn's disease

The role of the aminosalicylates for induction therapy of mild moderate ulcerative colitis and as maintenance treatment has been substantiated by a large series of controlled clinical trials and confirmatory meta-analyses. Both sulfasalazine and newer derivatives are effective in preventing relapses. It remains to be determined whether certain high-risk groups of patients may benefit from higher doses of mesalamine induction or maintenance therapy. Mesalamine derivatives are also of benefit in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Sulfasalazine is likely not effective in the maintenance of Crohn's disease, although other mesalamine formulations continue to show some prophylactic activity after mesalamine induced remissions and for patients with disease of the ileum who have undergone surgical resection.

Tolerance of 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 5-aminosalicylic-induced acute pancreatitis

Derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease may induce acute pancreatitis of immunoallergic origin. 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) differs from its 5-ASA counterpart by the position of the NH2 group and has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis. The risk of cross intolerance reaction between 5-ASA and 4-ASA has currently never been evaluated. We report three cases of 5-ASA-induced pancreatitis, with no recurrence of pancreatitis during subsequent treatment with 4-ASA enemas. We conclude that 4-ASA enemas are a safe and well-tolerated therapeutic alternative whenever 5-ASA-induced pancreatitis occurs.

Medical treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon with an increasing incidence worldwide. The medical management of this disease continues to expand as drugs to induce and maintain remission are sought to avoid the need for colectomy. This article will review the standard of care for the treatment of mild, moderate, and severe ulcerative colitis. The efficacy, optimal usage, and adverse events profile of agents such as 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and cyclosporine will be discussed and an algorithm for their use will be developed. Alternative and experimental therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, probiotics, and heparin will also be addressed.

Systematic review: short-term adverse effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid agents in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

AIM

To determine whether there is a difference in short-term adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for articles published until 2002. Randomized trials of oral mesalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide for the treatment of active disease or the maintenance of remission were included. Outcomes of interest were the frequencies of patients experiencing adverse events and those withdrawn due to adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-six trials were included. One study of mesalazine vs. sulfasalazine for active colitis showed significantly fewer patients with adverse events with mesalazine. Both balsalazide vs. sulfasalazine studies for active disease showed significantly fewer withdrawals with balsalazide. One trial of balsalazide vs. sulfasalazine for maintenance showed significantly fewer patients with adverse events with balsalazide. Otherwise, no significant differences in safety outcomes were noted.

CONCLUSION

All three 5-aminosalicylic acid agents are safe in the short term. In mesalazine-treated patients, the frequencies of adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events were comparable with those in placebo-treated patients and lower than those in sulfasalazine-treated patients. Overall, adverse events or withdrawals were not significantly more frequent with olsalazine than with placebo or sulfasalazine. Adverse events and study withdrawals on balsalazide were less frequent than those on sulfasalazine.

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis

AIM

: To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

: Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)].

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

: Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted.

MAIN RESULTS

: The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%.

CONCLUSIONS

: The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.

Interstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with mesalamine

Mesalamines are slow-release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and are effective as primary treatment and maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Interstitial nephritis is a recognized side effect. We report two cases of biopsy-confirmed interstitial nephritis in patients being treated with 5-ASA. Both had a trial of steroid therapy. One patient had partial recovery of renal function but the other patient was in chronic renal failure and likely was approaching the need for dialysis. Interstitial nephritis is an under-recognized complication of 5-ASA therapy. Early identification and withdrawal of this drug can lead to a partial or complete reversal of renal dysfunction.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of slow release mesalazine

Slow release oral mesalazine (Pentasa) contains microgranules covered by a semipermeable ethylcellulose membrane. The microgranules continuously release their content from duodenum to ileum in a pH- and time-dependent way. About 75% of the microgranules pass into the colon, where further release is slower. This release pattern does not appear to be affected by food, diarrhoea or the simultaneous use of H2 antagonists. Rectal forms of mesalazine deliver active drug directly to the rectum and left colon. Plasma concentrations of mesalazine and its metabolite acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid after oral or local administration are the result of systemic absorption and hepatic metabolism by N-acetyltransferase. Most studies report maximal plasma concentrations of less than 1 mg/L after oral administration of slow release mesalazine, much lower than those observed after uncoated mesalazine but generally higher than after azo-bound drugs such as sulfasalazine. Urinary recovery is an indicator of absorption and metabolism, and is lower after rectal administration (10 to 30%) than after oral administration (30 to 40%). Faecal recovery after oral administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine is lower than with azo-bound drugs. Mesalazine acts locally after absorption by colonic and ileal mucosa. Mean steady-state concentrations of 25.7+/-2.2 microg/kg wet weight are found in ileocolonic biopsy specimens from patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated for 1 week with slow release mesalazine 1.5 g/day. Intramucosal concentrations after slow release mesalazine differ little between healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although significant differences are found between the various aminosalicylates in release patterns and the resulting pharmacokinetic parameters, no differences in therapeutic effects have been found in comparative studies. High doses of oral mesalazine (2 to 4 g/day) are more effective than lower doses in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis. High doses (4 g/day) are also effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, predominantly in patients with ileitis. In contrast, no dose ranging effects were demonstrated with local treatment forms: mesalazine 1g enema seems sufficient for patients with distal colitis. Higher serum concentrations and urinary recoveries after the administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine compared with azo-bound drugs suggest a higher risk for renal adverse effects, although the reported occurrence is extremely low. Although preliminary data support an association between mucosal concentrations of mesalazine and its clinical activity, further studies are needed to correlate the effects of this drug with its pharmacokinetic parameters.