Safety and efficacy of azathioprine in the maintenance of ciclosporin-induced remission of ulcerative colitis

Use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The two main forms of intestinal bowel disease, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are not curable but can be controlled by various medical therapies. The Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) has prepared clinical practice guidelines to help physicians prescribe corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs for these patients. The guidelines consider therapies that induce remission in patients with active disease as well as treatment regimens that maintain remission. These guidelines complement already existing guidelines from IG-IBD on the use of biological drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Second Korean guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The direct and indirect costs of the treatment of UC are high, and the quality of life of patients is reduced, especially during exacerbation of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies, including biologics, are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist, which sometimes lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, the IBD study group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases established the first Korean guidelines for the management of UC in 2012. This is an update of the first guidelines. It was generally made by the adaptation of several foreign guidelines as was the first edition, and encompasses treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission, and indication of surgery for UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence and classification of recommendations.

Ciclosporin versus infliximab in patients with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids: a parallel, open-label randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ciclosporin and infliximab are potential rescue treatments to avoid colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous corticosteroids. We compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs for this indication.

METHODS

In this parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients were aged at least 18 years, had an acute severe flare of ulcerative colitis defined by a Lichtiger score greater than 10 points, and had been given an unsuccessful course of high-dose intravenous steroids. None of the patients had previously received ciclosporin or infliximab. Between June 1, 2007, and Aug 31, 2010, patients at 27 European centres were randomly assigned (via computer-derived permutation tables; 1:1) to receive either intravenous ciclosporin (2 mg/kg per day for 1 week, followed by oral drug until day 98) or infliximab (5 mg/kg on days 0, 14, and 42). In both groups, azathioprine was started at day 7 in patients with a clinical response. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to study treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was treatment failure defined by absence of a clinical response at day 7, a relapse between day 7 and day 98, absence of steroid-free remission at day 98, a severe adverse event leading to treatment interruption, colectomy, or death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2006-005299-42) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00542152).

FINDINGS

115 patients were randomly assigned; 58 patients were allocated to receive ciclosporin and 57 to receive infliximab. Treatment failure occurred in 35 (60%) patients given ciclosporin and 31 (54%) given infliximab (absolute risk difference 6%; 95% CI -7 to 19; p=0·52). Nine (16%) patients in the ciclosporin group and 14 (25%) in the infliximab group had severe adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Ciclosporin was not more effective than infliximab in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids. In clinical practice, treatment choice should be guided by physician and centre experience.

FUNDING

Association François Aupetit, Société Nationale Française de Gastroentérologie, and the International Organization for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

[Guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The quality of life can decreases significantly during exacerbations of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist and sometimes these lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) Study Group of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) set out the Korean guidelines for the management of UC. These guidelines are made by the adaptation using several foreign guidelines and encompass treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission and indication for surgery in UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence. These are the first Korean treatment guidelines for UC and will be revised with new evidences on treatment of UC.

Treatment of hospitalized adult patients with severe ulcerative colitis: Toronto consensus statements

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to provide updated explicit and relevant consensus statements for clinicians to refer to when managing hospitalized adult patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus group of 23 voting participants developed a series of recommendation statements that addressed pertinent clinical questions. An iterative voting and feedback process was used to do this in conjunction with systematic literature reviews. These statements were brought to a formal consensus meeting held in Toronto, Ontario (March 2010), when each statement was discussed, reformulated, voted upon, and subsequently revised until group consensus (at least 80% agreement) was obtained. The modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria were used to rate the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

As a result of the iterative process, consensus was reached on 21 statements addressing four themes (General considerations and nutritional issues, Steroid use and predictors of steroid failure, Cyclosporine and infliximab, and Surgical issues).

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe UC include early escalation to second-line medical therapy with either infliximab or cyclosporine in individuals in whom parenteral steroids have failed after 72 h. These agents should be used in experienced centers where appropriate support is available. Sequential therapy with cyclosporine and infliximab is not recommended. Surgery is an option when first-line steroid therapy fails, and is indicated when second-line medical therapy fails and/or when complications arise during the hospitalization.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Debate exists regarding to whether thiopurine therapy is as effective in ulcerative colitis (UC) as it is in Crohn's disease.

AIM

To review systematically the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) in UC, and to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of AZA/MP for the induction or maintenance of UC clinical remission.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Evaluating AZA/MP for induction and/or maintenance of clinical remission of UC. Randomized-controlled-trials comparing AZA/MP with placebo/5-aminosalicylates were included in the meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic and manual. Study quality: Independently assessed by two reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

By 'intention-to-treat'.

RESULTS

Thirty noncontrolled studies (1632 patients) were included in the systematic review. Mean efficacy of AZA/MP was 65% for induction and 76% for maintenance of the remission. Seven controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis. (i) Induction of remission: four studies (89 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 73% vs. 64% in controls (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 0.59-4.29). (ii) Maintenance of remission: six studies (124 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 60% vs. 37% in controls (OR = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.51-4.34). When only studies comparing AZA/MP vs. placebo were considered, OR was 2.59 (95% CI = 1.26-5.3), absolute risk reduction was 23% and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was 5.

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine drugs (AZA/MP) are more effective than placebo for the prevention of relapse in UC, with an NNT of 5 and an absolute risk reduction of 23%.

Thiopurine-induced myelotoxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a review

AIM

Probably, the most important and potentially lethal adverse event of azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) is myelosuppression. Our aim was to conduct a review of AZA/MP-induced myelotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE/EMBASE. The studies evaluating thiopurine-induced myelotoxicity in patients with IBD were reviewed. The cumulative incidence and the incidence rate of AZA/MP-induced myelotoxicity were calculated by a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 66 studies (8,302 patients) were included. The cumulative incidence of AZA/MP-induced myelotoxicity was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-8%). The incidence rate (per patient and year of treatment) of the drug-induced myelotoxicity was 3% (95% CI 3-4%). The risk was roughly similar with AZA and with MP (7%vs 9%). The duration of AZA/MP treatment in patients with myelotoxicity ranged from 12 days to 27 yr. The cumulative incidence of infections among AZA/MP-induced myelotoxicity patients was 6.5%. The cumulative incidence of severe myelotoxicity was 1.1% (incidence rate 0.9%). Three deaths were reported due to myelotoxicity (cumulative incidence 0.06%, 95% CI 0.02-0.17%). The risk of death among patients who developed myelotoxicity was 0.94% (95% CI 0.32-2.70%).

CONCLUSION

The incidence rate of myelotoxicity in IBD patients receiving AZA/MP is approximately 3% per patient and year of treatment. Although bone marrow toxicity may develop at any time after starting the therapy, this happens more frequently during the first months. The incidence rate of severe myelotoxicity is less than 1% per patient and year of treatment, and the mortality risk is less than 0.1% (which means that the risk of death among IBD patients who develop myelotoxicity is approximately 1%).

[Current status of treatment of inflammatory bowel disease]

Inflammatory bowel disease encompasses a group of diseases with poorly defined etiology that affect the digestive tract. These diseases are characterized by their chronic course and by periods of disease activity, of variable severity, that alternate with periods of clinical remission. In the last few years, inflammatory bowel disease has been the object of intense research, which has increased knowledge of the physiopathogenic mechanisms involved. This has enabled the development of a new generation of biotechnological drugs effective in patients previously considered to be refractory to medical treatment and has allowed the accumulated corticosteroid dose to be reduced and the indications for surgery and hospital admissions to be decreased, thus improving quality of life. In addition, some classical drugs have been demonstrated to be effective in recurrence prevention after surgery for Crohn's disease and in the prevention of dysplasia and colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease.

Current and future therapies for inflammatory bowel disease

The introduction of biologic agents to the therapeutic arsenal has dramatically impacted the way we treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease, allowing clinicians to achieve lasting remission in patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapies. New research continues to expand our understanding of the inflammatory cascade of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, revealing a host of potential therapeutic targets for intervention. As we look toward the future in this rapidly developing field, we must learn how best to incorporate these new agents into the treatment algorithm to enhance or replace conventional therapies.

Study on the Colon Specific Delivery of Prednisolone Using Chitosan Capsules

In this study, we examined the effectiveness of chitosan capsules for the colon-specific delivery of prednisolone in rats. We also evaluated the effectiveness and side effects of prednisolone using chitosan capsules compared with the conventional dosage form (gelatin capsules). We found a significant increase in the concentration of prednisolone in the large intestinal mucosa when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules, as compared with the case using gelatin capsules. On the other hand, the plasma concentrations of prednisolone after oral administration using chitosan capsules were much lower than those in the case of gelatin capsules. We also assessed the effectiveness of prednisolone for the healing of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and colon wet weight/body weight (C/B) ratio. MPO activities and C/B ratios were significantly reduced when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules, in comparison with the case of gelatin capsules. Moreover, the weight of the thymus, which is an index of the side effects of prednisolone, markedly decreased after oral administration of prednisolone using gelatin capsules, whereas its weight did not change as much when prednisolone was administered orally using chitosan capsules. These findings indicate that chitosan capsules might be useful for the colon-specific delivery of prednisolone and its enhanced effectiveness for the healing of colitis in rats. Moreover, chitosan capsules might be also effective in reducing the side effects of prednisolone due to its decreased intestinal transfer to the systemic circulation.

Review article: thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

In the past 10-20 years, knowledge of both thiopurine pharmacology and -pharmacogenetics has been extended dramatically and used to develop new strategies to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity.

AIM

To review thiopurine efficacy, toxicity, pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, interactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Special attention was paid to new strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

To collect relevant scientific articles, a Pubmed search was performed from 1966 through January 2006 with the following key words (MeSH terms preferentially) in multiple combinations: 'azathioprine', '6-mercaptopurine', '6-MP', '6-thioguanine', '6-TG', 'thiopurine(s)', 'metabolites', 'level(s)', 'TDM', 'TMPT', 'ITPA', 'genotype(s)', 'phenotype(s)', 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'Crohn('s) disease', 'ulcerative colitis'.

RESULTS

Strategies for optimization of pharmacotherapy include therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites, geno- or phenotyping crucial enzymes in thiopurine metabolism like thiopurine S-methyltransferase and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase, and the use of thioguanine as such.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring are useful instruments for individualizing thiopurine pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase genotyping may be helpful in case of unexplainable myelotoxicity. In case of azathioprine- or mercaptopurine-intolerance, thioguanine seems a promising alternative. However, more knowledge needs to be gathered about its potential hepatotoxicity.

Update in medical therapy of ulcerative colitis: newer concepts and therapies

Recent advances in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis recognize the interface of genetic susceptibility, environmental factors (eg, gut microflora), and an altered host's immune response. The meteoric evolution of new therapies designed to address these pathogenetic factors may lead to confusing and often confounding treatment programs. This review is designed to assist the practitioner when in [corrected] incorporating new or novel therapies into a treatment program. These decisions are based on new clinical trial data and the experience of seasoned gastroenterologists with established remedies. NEWER CONCEPTS AND THERAPIES IN UC 5-ADA-- 1. Remains drug of choice for induction and maintenance of remission in mild to moderate IC.1,2 2. Rare but increased incidence of renal disease exists but benefits outweigh risks.18-20 3. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in UC is promising and may be related to higher dose and a lessened degree of inflammation.29-36 4. Bioequivalence of all USA 5-ASA is established. Choice of a 5-ASA preparation is not dependent on superiority of a particular mesalamine.3 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor (OPC-6525)37: preliminary data promising Immunomodulators 6MP/AZA 1. long-term effect not waning51 2. concerns over lymphoma voiced but overall benefits outweigh risks64-70 3. 6MP metabolites measurements of increasing use52-56 Cyclosporine experience continues but serious adverse events remains.105-114 Biologics Infliximab--somewhat disappointing in CUC, awaiting RCT87-92 Basiliximab--useful as "steroid sensitizer" in previously steroid resistant patients118-120 Visilizumab--promising as alternative to cyclosporin in server U.C.115-117 Apheresis--and emerging "non-drug" treatment alternative121-135 Probiotics--Useful in pouchitis and some mild to moderate U.C.94-98, 154 ISIS topical therapy useful in early pilot study (pouchitis)151 Budesonide (pouchitis)147 Antibiotics (pouchitis)140-146 [corrected]

Efficacy of intravenous cyclosporin in moderately severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroids

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of intravenous cyclosporin (CSA) in acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in moderately severe colitis refractory to steroids.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients (17 men, mean age 41 +/- 14 yr) with UC refractory to steroids treated with CSA were included in this study. Severity was defined according to Truelove criteria. A clinical activity score below 10 during 2 consecutive days defined clinical response.

RESULTS

According to Truelove criteria, all patients had moderate UC. CSA was administered IV at a mean daily dose of 3.7 +/- 0,5 mg/kg until response and then orally for 3.5 +/- 2.6 months. A clinical response was achieved in 20/26 patients (76,9%) within 5.7 +/- 2.8 days (5/6 failures were treated by proctocolectomy). During a follow-up of 27.8 +/- 20.8 months, relapse rate was 60% (12/20): 7 patients underwent proctocolectomy and 5 had clinical remission with CSA retreatment (N=4) and steroids (N=1). At the end of follow-up, 12 patients (46%) were in clinical remission, 12 (46%) required colectomy, 1 had chronic active UC and 1 was lost of follow-up. The probability to avoid surgery was 52% at 78 months. The only factor associated with avoidance of surgery was concomitant treatment with azathioprine (P=0.007). Ten reversible adverse events occurred in 9 patients.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that CSA is safe and effective in moderately severe steroid resistant UC. Concomitant treatment with azathioprine significantly decreases the rate of subsequent surgery. CSA may act as a "bridge" until the therapeutic action of azathioprine is achieved for maintenance treatment. These results should be further confirmed by a prospective controlled study.

Ciclosporin use in acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term experience

BACKGROUND

Within a lifetime, approximately 15% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients will have a severe relapse necessitating admission to hospital. Despite intravenous steroid treatment, approximately 25% will require either surgery or ciclosporin (CsA) rescue therapy. Initial response rates to CsA have been encouraging, but remission rates have been disappointing. There is a paucity of long-term data on UC patients who have been brought into remission with CsA.

OBJECTIVES

To report our 7 year experience on the use of CsA in acute UC and to highlight long-term follow-up data on these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective database of 76 UC patients requiring CsA between 1996 and 2003 was constructed. CsA was started on the basis of their C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or stool frequency after 3 days or after 5-7 days of i.v. hydrocortisone. The patients (33 female, 43 male, mean age 44.5 years) were followed up for a median 2.9 years (range 0.2-7.0 years). Fifty-four patients received i.v. CsA (4 mg/kg), while 22 received oral CsA (5 mg/kg). Long-term outcome was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis: time to first relapse and time to surgery.

RESULTS

Median disease duration was 6.6 years. Median CRP and stool frequency at day 3 was 20 mg/l and 6 per day, respectively. Fifty-six patients (74%) achieved initial remission. CsA was discontinued in only four patients due to side effects. Duration of i.v. steroids or the addition of AZA did not improve time to first relapse or time to surgery. Comparison between i.v. CsA and oral CsA revealed a statistically significant difference in time to first relapse (P < 0.01) and time to surgery (P < 0.05) in favour of oral CsA.

CONCLUSIONS

These data describe the long-term outcome of the largest series of patients so far reported that have had treatment with CsA for severe refractory UC. If patients achieved initial remission with CsA, after 1 year, 65% had relapsed and after 3 years 90% had relapsed. After 7 years, 58% had come to colectomy. Minor side effects were frequent, but none were life threatening. There was no increase in post-operative complications in those who came to colectomy.

Review article: the long-term management of ulcerative colitis

After the induction of remission, the second priority of therapy for ulcerative colitis is sustained clinical remission, defined as the absence of inflammatory symptoms (diarrhoea, bleeding, rectal urgency) and the maintenance of an intact mucosa, with the absence of ulcers, friability or significant granularity at endoscopy. The 'optimal' maintenance strategy will depend on the therapy needed to induce remission. Thus, the transition from induction to maintenance therapy will be determined by the intensity of acute therapy necessary to induce remission and the duration of therapy required to complete the resolution of clinical symptoms. There are few controlled clinical trials pertaining to maintenance after each induction regimen. However, experience dictates that aminosalicylates are efficacious after aminosalicylate-induced remissions, that steroids should be tapered according to the time required to induce remission, that patients requiring ciclosporin will benefit from the addition of long-term immunomodulation with azathioprine or mercaptopurine, and that many patients with distal colitis who require topical mesalazine (mesalamine) will continue to need topical therapy to maintain remission, albeit at reduced frequency. The expectations for maintenance therapy require patient adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen. Patients require education with regard to the long-term goals of maintenance therapy (e.g. prevention of relapse, reduction of long-term complications of disease activity or risks of acute therapy with steroids), and should be warned against the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cautioned about the cessation of smoking, when applicable, due to potential risks of relapse or chronic activity.

Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

In the past decade, immunosuppressive drugs have come to play an integral role in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Cyclosporine, microemulsion cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil can be considered for the treatment of patients with refractory inflammatory Crohn's disease, fistulizing Crohn's disease, and severe ulcerative colitis. This article reviews the use of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, with emphasis on pharmacology, results in controlled clinical trials, and safety, and issues related to dosing and toxicity monitoring.

Rectocolite ulcéro-hémorragique chronique active

OBJECTIVE

To know whether the therapeutic protocol applied in the case of severe acute ulcerative colitis (UC) associating ciclosporine and azathioprine was also effective in the case of moderate chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

in this retrospective study 10 patients (31-65 years, 6 distal colitis, 1 left colitis, 3 pancolitis) moderately active and corticosteroid-resistant or dependent were included. Patients received ciclosporine intraveinously (4 mg/kg/d) and were evaluated 10 days later. If efficient, ciclosporine was given orally for 3 Months, azathioprine was introduced and steroids were progressively tapered.

RESULTS

on inclusion the clinical score, based on the Mayo Clinic score, was of 5.7 +/- 0.5. On Day 10, the score decreased significantly (2.1 +/- 0.7, p<0.001) and the therapeutic effect was sustained at the third Month (1.8 +/- 0.7). With azathioprine, 4 patients were still in remission with a mean follow up of 23.3 +/- 15.5 Months.

CONCLUSION

therapeutic scheme proposed in severe acute UC failing to respond to steroids may be helpful in some patients with a chronic active UC. Clinical improvement is rapid and long-term response is maintained in about 1 patient out of 2.

Medical therapy for ulcerative colitis 2004

There continue to be evolutionary changes in the management of ulcerative colitis despite the fact that, aside from a variety of aminosalicylate formulations, no new therapies have been approved over the past few decades. Nevertheless, debates continue regarding the optimization of treatment with aminosalicylates and the short- and long-term benefits of immunomodulation in ulcerative colitis. This article focuses on the most recent clinical studies pertaining to the management of ulcerative colitis and explores both the advances and controversies pertaining to aminosalicylate therapy, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and the purine antimetabolites. Novel therapeutic approaches--including preliminary experience with biological therapies directed at tumor necrosis factor and other cytokines, adhesion molecules, growth factors, and probiotics--will be reviewed. Recent data regarding potential chemoprevention in long-standing ulcerative colitis and management of postoperative complications and pouchitis will also be discussed.

Outcome of a conservative approach in severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Severe ulcerative colitis is potentially life threatening even though a policy of intensive medical management and early colectomy in recent years reduced mortality to almost zero. However, colectomy, with or without ileal-anal anastomosis, has its own problems (morbidity, pouchitis, cuffitis) and no reliable prognostic index of surgical outcome has been developed. Intravenous steroids are still the mainstay of medical therapy but their maximal duration before stating a 'treatment failure' has not been defined.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and outcome of an intensive medical approach in a series of patients with severe ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-nine episodes of severe ulcerative colitis in 115 patients admitted to a Gastroenterology Unit in a 7-year period were retrospectively evaluated. Intravenous glucocorticosteroids--methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day--and topical steroids were administered, and supportive treatments with intensive monitoring were extended to all the patients. Second-line strategies for steroid-refractoriness were prolonged glucocorticosteroids treatment, oral ciclosporin, infliximab or surgery.

RESULTS

The median number of Truelove criteria at admission was 3 (range 2-5), median CRP 34 mg/l (range 10-196). Median follow-up after discharge was 49 months. In 84 (57%) episodes an early response was noted, while 65 (43%) did not respond within 10 days to the standard steroid treatment. In the non-responders group, 28 patients went into remission with a prolonged steroid treatment (slow responders); 15 patients were treated with ciclosporin (eight responders) and 6 with infliximab (four responders). A total of 24 colectomies was performed in this group of patients (in 21 cases within 30 days from admission). Slow responders showed lower albumin levels (P = 0.02), higher cumulative dose of glucocorticosteroids in the year prior to admission (P = 0.02) and higher age (P = 0.03), in comparison with early responders. Major complications were noted in four episodes which responded to medical treatment. Disease-related mortality was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical treatment and use of second-line therapies were effective in the present series of patients. A group of slow responders has been identified and, if an intensive medical monitoring is guaranteed, steroids can be safely prolonged after the first 10 days of treatment. Cumulatively, about 80% of the patients responded to short-term medical treatment, only 5% of the patients underwent colectomy in the follow-up period. Major adverse events were recorded in four patients, who had recovered completely after adequate medical treatment.

Combination immunomodulatory therapy with cyclosporine and azathioprine in corticosteroid-resistant severe ulcerative colitis: the Edinburgh experience of outcome

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine is a fungal metabolite and a powerful immunosuppressant. While response to intravenous steroids in severe ulcerative colitis is in excess of 60%, the remainder of patients are left with the options of curative panproctocolectomy or administration of intravenous rescue therapy with cyclosporine. There have been conflicting reports on the efficacy of intravenous cyclosporine in acute ulcerative colitis, and there are serious concerns about potential toxicity and opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carnii pneumonia. There are also concerns about early relapse and colectomy following cyclosporine rescue. To date there has been a paucity of data available to help guide the gastroenterologist in the use of cyclosporine and the maintenance of remission once achieved.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2001, a total of sixteen patients who had received intravenous cyclosporine for acute exacerbation of their known UC (seven females, nine males, mean age 33 years) whose records were available for analysis. All patients were refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone (60 mg/24 h). Patients who responded to cyclosporine were discharged on a regimen of oral cyclosporine, oral steroids oral azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylate.

RESULTS

Median disease duration was 5.4 years (range 0.9-25 years). All sixteen patients were initially treated with cyclosporine at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day. Nine patients were started on oral azathioprine (median dose 1.8 mg/kg). Seven patients underwent surgery (panproctocolectomy), although none had surgery after 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients with <7 days and >7 days intravenous steroid. Other parameters analysed were stool frequency at 3 days and CRP at 3 days. There were no significant differences between these groups. Median bowel frequency at day 3 was higher in patients who finally underwent surgery. At 3 years follow-up, 56% of the sixteen patients had avoided surgery by using azathioprine immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

The initial response rate to intravenous cyclosporine was high (69%). Side effects were documented in the majority of patients, but none of the patients had to discontinue treatment on account of these. Azathioprine has a useful role in maintaining the remission achieved by i.v. cyclosporine for acute ulcerative colitis patients. More than half the patients will avoid colectomy long-term when using triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine adding support for its relative safety and another role for its use.

Ciclosporin and refractory colitis

Intravenous ciclosporin 4 mg/kg daily is rapidly effective as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory colitis, who would otherwise face colectomy, but its use is controversial because of risk of toxicity, and long-term failure rate. Opportunistic infections remain a serious concern, with a number of reports of death related to ciclosporin. Renal and neurotoxicity are also well-recognized. The drug should not be continued for more than 3-6 months and its main role is as a bridge to azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Risks of toxicity can be reduced by using lower doses (2 mg/kg/day intravenously), by oral microemulsion ciclosporin, or by monotherapy without corticosteroids. Preliminary evidence shows good response rates, but further studies are needed to confirm optimal use of this potent, but hazardous, therapy.

Management of acute severe colitis

Early identification of patients with acute severe colitis is essential so that prompt treatment can be instigated. Corticosteroids have remained the mainstay of treatment since 1955. The introduction of ciclosporin into the pharmacological armamentarium has reduced early colectomy rates but even with modern medical management up to 30% of patients will still undergo colectomy on the same admission. The overall mortality is now less than 1% in specialist centres compared to 30% in the pre-steroid era. The future promises further advances in treatment through medications that are targeted directly at the underlying inflammatory process.

Standard treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammation of the colon which may present with a range of mild to severe symptoms. The disease may be localized to the rectum or can be more extensive and involve the left side of the colon or the whole colon. Treatment in UC is directed towards inducing and maintaining remission of symptoms and mucosal inflammation. The key parameters to be assessed for the most appropriate treatment are the severity and extent of the inflammation. Meta-analyses of published trials have shown that topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the treatment of choice in active distal mild-to-moderate UC. Oral aminosalicylates are effective in both distal and extensive mild-to-moderate disease, but in distal disease, the rates of remission are lower than those obtained with topical 5-ASA. New steroids, such as budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), administered as enemas, constitute an alternative to 5-ASA therapy. In some studies, these have been shown to be as effective as conventional steroids but with significantly lower inhibition of plasma cortisol levels. Patients with unresponsive disease or those with more severe presentation will require oral corticosteroids and sometimes intravenous therapy. Approximately 10% of patients with unresponsive UC have severe attacks requiring hospitalization. Patients with severe disease should be managed jointly by a medical and surgical team, and intensive intravenous treatment should be started with high-dose steroids. Early recognition of failure of therapy will allow the introduction of immunosuppressive therapy with intravenous cyclosporine. Patients who respond are shifted to oral cyclosporine associated with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, whereas those who fail will require proctocolectomy. Oral aminosalicylates are the first-line therapy in maintenance of remission. Topical 5-ASA may play a role in distal disease. Patients who are steroid dependent can be started on azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine although it may take up to 3 months for the treatment to become effective. They may have reversible immediate side effects, such as pancreatitis or bone marrow suppression, which disappear upon discontinuation of therapy. Close monitoring of these hematologic and biochemical parameters will improve safety. The use of biologic therapy with infliximab in more severe disease has not been established.

Azathioprine without oral ciclosporin in the long-term maintenance of remission induced by intravenous ciclosporin in severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous ciclosporin is considered to be the only alternative to avoid surgery in severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. In responders, some authors recommend a switch to oral ciclosporin to act as a 'bridge' until the therapeutic action of azathioprine is achieved for maintenance treatment.

AIM

To report the short- and long-term outcome of intravenous ciclosporin-responsive ulcerative colitis patients treated with oral azathioprine without oral ciclosporin.

METHODS

The records of all patients treated with intravenous ciclosporin for severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis were reviewed. Responders following treatment with azathioprine but without oral ciclosporin as maintenance therapy were included. Patients with colonic cytomegalovirus infection and/or follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were included. Steroids were discontinued in 24 (89%). The median follow-up was 36 months. Eighteen (75%) patients presented mild or moderate relapses, which were easily managed with salicylates or steroids. Cumulative probabilities of relapse were 42%, 72% and 77% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Eleven (40.7%) patients underwent elective colectomy. Cumulative probabilities of colectomy were 29%, 35% and 42% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. No opportunistic infections were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral azathioprine seems to be enough to maintain long-term remission induced by intravenous ciclosporin in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The 'bridging step' with oral ciclosporin may not be necessary in this subset of patients, although a randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm this hypothesis.

Evolving medical therapies for ulcerative colitis

Therapies for patients with ulcerative colitis have, until recently, been limited in scope and efficacy. New formulations of mesalamine and corticosteroids have challenged the older therapies with respect to both efficacy and safety. The application of 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine for steroid-refractory disease and maintenance of remission has resulted in studies of other candidate immunomodulatory agents. Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor, adhesion molecules, or other cytokines are under intense scrutiny as potential disease-altering agents that may even replace currently available products. Other approaches, including such wide-ranging products as heparin, nicotine, and probiotics, suggest that control of ulcerative colitis may require an individualized approach for each patient.

Evolving medical therapies for ulcerative colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis have traditionally relied on sulfasalazine, mesalamine, and corticosteroids as the mainstay of medical therapy. Steroid-refractory, -dependent, or -intolerant patients have resorted to agents such as cyclosporine for short-term efficacy and 6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine for long-term efficacy. The next generation of evolving therapies includes many novel agents that target various aspects of the human immune response. Therapies that block the production or action of tumor necrosis factor have received much interest in inflammatory bowel disease. Treatments currently under study include interleukins, interferons, T-cell selective antibodies, molecules involved in cellular trafficking and signaling, mucosal healing or growth factors, and novel steroid agents. Other "less traditional" therapies, including probiotics, heparins, and anti-gastric ulcer remedies, challenge our understanding of the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and may provide further insights into future therapies.