The effect of phenylephrine and norepinephrine in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension*

Transplantation, bridging, and support technologies in pulmonary hypertension

Despite the progress made in medical therapies for treating pulmonary hypertension (PH), a subset of patients remain susceptible to developing a maladaptive right ventricular phenotype. The effective management of end-stage PH presents substantial challenges, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach and early identification of patients prone to acute decompensation. Identifying potential transplant candidates and assessing the feasibility of such a procedure are pivotal tasks that should be undertaken early in the treatment algorithm. Inclusion on the transplant list is contingent upon a comprehensive risk assessment, also considering the specific type of PH and various factors affecting waiting times, all of which should inform the decision-making process. While bilateral lung transplantation is the preferred option, it demands expert intra- and post-operative management to mitigate the heightened risks of pulmonary oedema and primary graft dysfunction in PH patients.Despite the availability of risk assessment tools, the occurrence of acute PH decompensation episodes can be unpredictable, potentially leading to refractory right ventricular failure even with optimal medical intervention, necessitating the use of rescue therapies. Advancements in right ventricular assist techniques and adjustments to graft allocation protocols for the most critically ill patients have significantly enhanced the survival in intensive care, affording the opportunity to endure while awaiting an urgent transplant. Given the breadth of therapeutic options available, specialised centres capable of delivering comprehensive care have become indispensable for optimising patient outcomes. These centres are instrumental in providing holistic support and management tailored to the complex needs of PH patients, ultimately enhancing their chances of a successful transplant and improved long-term prognosis.

The Management of Cardiogenic Shock From Diagnosis to Devices: A Narrative Review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogenous syndrome broadly characterized by inadequate cardiac output leading to tissue hypoperfusion and multisystem organ dysfunction that carries an ongoing high mortality burden. The management of CS has advanced rapidly, especially with the incorporation of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. A thorough understanding of how to approach a patient with CS and to select appropriate monitoring and treatment paradigms is essential in modern ICUs. Timely characterization of CS severity and hemodynamics is necessary to optimize outcomes, and this may be performed best by multidisciplinary shock-focused teams. In this article, we provide a review of CS aimed to inform both the cardiology-trained and non-cardiology-trained intensivist provider. We briefly describe the causes, pathophysiologic features, diagnosis, and severity staging of CS, focusing on gathering key information that is necessary for making management decisions. We go on to provide a more detailed review of CS management principles and practical applications, with a focus on tMCS. Medical management focuses on appropriate medication therapy to optimize perfusion-by enhancing contractility and minimizing afterload-and to facilitate decongestion. For more severe CS, or for patients with decompensating hemodynamic status despite medical therapy, initiation of the appropriate tMCS increasingly is common. We discuss the most common devices currently used for patients with CS-phenotyping patients as having left ventricular failure, right ventricular failure, or biventricular failure-and highlight key available data and particular points of consideration that inform tMCS device selection. Finally, we highlight core components of sedation and respiratory failure management for patients with CS.

Assessing Right Ventricle Over Time in Patients on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Insights From Serial Echocardiography

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is often used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with refractory hypoxemia. There is limited literature highlighting the development of right ventricular (RV) failure while on ECMO. We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study including 70 patients who were placed on veno-venous (VV)-ECMO for respiratory failure at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 2018 and June 2022 and had at least two post-ECMO transthoracic echoes. The primary outcomes were the incidence and progression of RV dysfunction and dilatation. The secondary outcome was in-patient mortality. Among 70 patients in our cohort, 60.6% had a normal RV function at the time of ECMO placement, whereas only 42% had a normal RV function at the second post-ECMO echo. On multinomial regression, a moderate decrease in RV function was associated with ECMO flow (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32, p = 0.001) and ECMO duration (OR = 1.01, p = 0.01). A moderately dilated RV size was also associated with ECMO flow (OR = 2.62, p < 0.001) and ECMO duration (OR = 1.02, p = 0.02). An increasing degree of RV dysfunction was associated with worse outcomes. Our study showed that the increasing duration and flow of VV-ECMO correlated with progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction, which were associated with poor survival.

Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a complex, life-threatening condition, and emergency clinicians must be ready to resuscitate and rapidly pursue primary reperfusion therapy. The first-line reperfusion therapy for patients with high-risk PE is systemic thrombolytics (ST). Despite consensus guidelines, only a fraction of eligible patients receive ST for high-risk PE.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides emergency clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding the management of high-risk PE with an emphasis on ST and other reperfusion therapies to address the gap between practice and guideline recommendations.

DISCUSSION

High-risk PE is defined as PE that causes hemodynamic instability. The high mortality rate and dynamic pathophysiology of high-risk PE make it challenging to manage. Initial stabilization of the decompensating patient includes vasopressor administration and supplemental oxygen or high-flow nasal cannula. Primary reperfusion therapy should be pursued for those with high-risk PE, and consensus guidelines recommend the use of ST for high-risk PE based on studies demonstrating benefit. Other options for reperfusion include surgical embolectomy and catheter directed interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency clinicians must possess an understanding of high-risk PE including the clinical assessment, pathophysiology, management of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure, and primary reperfusion therapies.

Effects of phenylephrine on systemic and cerebral circulations in humans: a systematic review with mechanistic explanations

We conducted a systematic review of the literature reporting phenylephrine-induced changes in blood pressure, cardiac output, cerebral blood flow and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in humans. We used the proportion change of the group mean values reported by the original studies in our analysis. Phenylephrine elevates blood pressure whilst concurrently inducing a reduction in cardiac output. Furthermore, despite increasing cerebral blood flow, it decreases cerebral tissue oxygen saturation. The extent of phenylephrine's influence on cardiac output (r = -0.54 and p = 0.09 in awake humans; r = -0.55 and p = 0.007 in anaesthetised humans), cerebral blood flow (r = 0.65 and p = 0.002 in awake humans; r = 0.80 and p = 0.003 in anaesthetised humans) and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (r = -0.72 and p = 0.03 in awake humans; r = -0.24 and p = 0.48 in anaesthetised humans) appears closely linked to the magnitude of phenylephrine-induced blood pressure changes. When comparing the effects of phenylephrine in awake and anaesthetised humans, we found no evidence of a significant difference in cardiac output, cerebral blood flow or cerebral tissue oxygen saturation. There was also no evidence of a significant difference in effect on systemic and cerebral circulations whether phenylephrine was given by bolus or infusion. We explore the underlying mechanisms driving the phenylephrine-induced cardiac output reduction, cerebral blood flow increase and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation decrease. Individualised treatment approaches, close monitoring and consideration of potential risks and benefits remain vital to the safe and effective use of phenylephrine in acute care.

Sotatercept for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Inpatient Setting

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who are admitted to the hospital pose a challenge to the multidisciplinary healthcare team due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of their disease state and PAH-specific medication considerations. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive disease that may lead to death as a result of right ventricular (RV) failure. During acute on chronic RV failure it is critical to decrease the pulmonary vascular resistance with the goal of improving RV function and prognosis; therefore, aggressive PAH-treatment based on disease risk stratification is essential. Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment for acute on chronic RV failure can be impacted by end-organ damage, hemodynamic instability, drug interactions, and PAH medications dosage and delivery. Sotatercept, a first in class activin signaling inhibitor that works on the bone morphogenetic protein/activin pathway is on track for Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of PAH based on results of recent trials in where the medication led to clinical and hemodynamic improvements, even when added to traditional PAH-specific therapies. The purpose of this review is to highlight important considerations when starting or continuing sotatercept in patients admitted to the hospital with PAH.

Surgery and Anesthesia in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is characterized by right ventricular impairment and a reduced ability to compensate for hemodynamic insults. Consequently, surgery can be challenging but is increasingly considered in view of available specific therapies and improved longer term survival. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach involving surgeons, anesthetists, pulmonary hypertension clinicians, and intensivists. The optimal pathway involves risk:benefit assessment for the proposed operation, optimization of pulmonary hypertension and any comorbidities, the appropriate anesthetic approach for the specific procedure and patient, and careful monitoring and management in the postoperative period. Where patients are carefully selected and meticulously managed, good outcomes can be achieved.

Management of Acutely Decompensated Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a severe life-threatening condition associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance and resulting right heart dysfunction. Admission to intensive care unit with acutely decompensated right heart failure is a significant negative prognostic event with a high risk of multisystem organ dysfunction and death. Presentations are heterogenous and may combine signs of both diastolic and systolic dysfunction complicating management. Renal dysfunction is often present, but other organ systems can be involved resulting in findings such as acute hepatic dysfunction or bowel wall congestion and ischemia. The goals of therapy are to rapidly reverse ventriculo-arterial decoupling and reduce right ventricular afterload to prevent progression to refractory or irreversible right heart failure. Triggering events must be investigated for and addressed urgently if identified. Volume status management is critical and both noninvasive and invasive testing can aid in prognostication and guide management, including the use of inotropes and vasopressors. In cases of refractory right heart dysfunction, consideration of urgent lung transplantation and mechanical circulatory support is necessary. These patients should be managed at expert centers in an intensive care setting with a multidisciplinary team of practitioners experienced in the management of right heart dysfunction given the high short- and long-term mortality resulting from acute decompensated right heart failure.

The haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Phenylephrine increases systemic- and pulmonary resistances and therefore may increase blood pressures at the expense of blood flow. Cardio-pulmonary bypass alters vasoreactivity and many patients exhibit chronotropic insufficiency after cardiac surgery. We aimed to describe the haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine infusion after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Patients in steady state after low-risk cardiac surgery received incremental infusion rates of phenylephrine up to 1.0 μg/kg/min with the aim of increasing systemic mean arterial blood pressure 20 mmHg. Invasive haemodynamic parameters, including pulmonary wedge pressures, were captured along with echocardiographic measures of biventricular function before, during phenylephrine infusion at target systemic blood pressure, and 20 min after phenylephrine discontinuation.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. Phenylephrine increased mean arterial pressure increased from 78 (±9) mmHg to 98 (±10) mmHg with phenylephrine infusion. Also, pulmonary blood pressure as well as systemic- and pulmonary resistances increased. The ratio between systemic- and pulmonary artery resistances did not change statistically significantly (p = .59). Median cardiac output was 4.35 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-5.4) L/min at baseline and increased significantly with phenylephrine infusion (median Δcardiac output was 0.25 [IQR 0.1-0.6] L/min) (p = .012). Pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased from 10.2 (±3.0) mmHg to 11.9 (±3.4) mmHg (p < .001). This was accompanied by significant increases in central venous pressure. Phenylephrine infusion increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume from 105 (±46) mL to 119 (±44) mL (p < .001). All results of phenylephrine infusion were reversed with discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In haemodynamically stable patients after cardiac surgery, phenylephrine increased PVR and SVR, but did not change the PVR/SVR ratio. Phenylephrine increased biventricular filling pressures and left ventricular end-diastolic area. Consequently, CO increased as ejection fraction was maintained. These findings do not discourage the use of phenylephrine after low-risk cardiac surgery.

REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov (identifier NCT04419662).

Perioperative Decision-Making in Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic manifestation of cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory pathologies. Cardiorespiratory pathologies account for nearly three-fourths of patients with PH. It is now increasingly being recognised due to routine requests for transthoracic echocardiographic examination in the perioperative setting in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk non-cardiac surgery. The increased risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality attributed to PH have been widely acknowledged in the literature. The importance of PH in perioperative decision-making and postoperative outcomes has had little mention in all the guidelines. Understanding the complexity of the pathophysiology of PH may help in anaesthetic and surgical decision-making. Preoperative evaluation and risk assessment are guided by the nature, extent, invasiveness, and duration of surgery. Surgical decision-making and anaesthetic management involve preoperative risk stratification, understanding the interactions between surgical procedures and PH, and understanding the interactions between anaesthetic procedures, PH, and cardiopulmonary interactions. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring is crucial for maintaining the haemodynamic parameters and helps titrate anaesthetic agents and medication. This narrative review focusses on all issues related to anaesthetic and surgical challenges in patients with PH. This review aimed to suggest a preoperative evaluation plan, surgical decision-making, anaesthetic plan, and anaesthetic management based on the evidence available in the literature.

Anesthetic management of a patient with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Methamphetamine abuse is a serious public health concern and causes various life-threatening disorders including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Herein, we present the first case report describing the anesthetic management of a patient with methamphetamine-associated PAH (M-A PAH) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 34-year-old female with M-A PAH suffered from deterioration of right ventricular (RV) heart failure due to recurrent cholecystitis and was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative assessment of PA pressure showed 82/32 (mean, 50) mmHg, and transthoracic echocardiology revealed a slight reduction of RV function. General anesthesia was induced and maintained by thiopental, remifentanil, sevoflurane, and rocuronium. PA pressure gradually increased after peritoneal insufflation; therefore, we administered dobutamine and nitroglycerin to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). The patient emerged from anesthesia smoothly.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding increased PVR by appropriate anesthesia and medical hemodynamic support is an important consideration for patients with M-A PAH.

Considerations for Inotrope and Vasopressor Use in Critically Ill Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive cardiopulmonary disease, characterized by pulmonary vasculopathy. The disease can lead to increase pulmonary arterial pressures and eventual right ventricle failure due to elevated afterload. The prevalence of PAH in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the ICU is more commonly the result of left heart disease or hypoxic lung injury (PH due to left heart disease and PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia, respectively), as opposed to PAH. Management of patients with PAH in the ICU is complex as it requires a careful balance to maintain perfusion while optimizing right-sided heart function. A comprehensive understanding of the underlying physiology and underlying hemodynamics is crucial for the management of this population. In this review, we summarized the evidence for use of vasopressors and inotropes in the management of PH and extrapolated the data to patients with PAH. We strongly believe that the understanding of the hemodynamic consequences of inotropes and vasopressors, especially from data in the PH population, can lead to better management of this complex patient population.

In-silico analysis of closed-loop vasopressor control of phenylephrine versus norepinephrine

We have previously demonstrated in in-silico, pre-clinical animal models, and finally human clinical studies the ability of a novel closed-loop vasopressor titration system to manage norepinephrine infusion rates to keep mean arterial blood pressure in a very tight range, reduce hypotension time and severity, and reduce overtreatment. We hypothesized that the same controller could, with modification for pharmacologic differences, suitably titrate a lower-potency longer duration of action agent like phenylephrine. Using the same physiologic simulation model as was used previously for in-silico testing of our controller for norepinephrine, we first updated the model to include a new vasopressor agent modeled after phenylephrine. A series of simulation tests patterned after our previous norepinephrine study was then conducted, this time using phenylephrine for management, in order to both test the system with the new agent and allow for comparisons between the two. Hundreds of simulation trials were conducted across a range of patient and environmental variances. The controller performance was characterized based on time in target, time above and below target, coefficient of variation, and using Varvel's criteria. The controller kept the simulated patients' MAP in target for 94% of management time in the simple scenarios and more than 85% of time in the most challenging scenarios. Varvel criteria were all under 1% error for expected pharmacologic responses and were consistent with those established for norepinephrine in our previous studies. The controller was able to acceptably titrate phenylephrine in this simulated patient model consistent with performance previously seen for norepinephrine after adjusting for the anticipated differences between the two agents.

Advanced airway management and respiratory care in decompensated pulmonary hypertension

Meticulous risk stratification is essential when considering intubation of a patient with decompensated pulmonary hypertension (dPH). It is paramount to understand both the pathophysiology of dPH (and associated right ventricular failure) and the complications related to a high-risk intubation before attempting the procedure. There are few recommendations in this area and the literature, guiding these recommendations, is limited to expert opinion and very few case reports/case series. This review will discuss the complex pathophysiology of dPH, the complications associated with intubation, the debates surrounding induction agents, and the available options for the intubation procedure, with specific emphasis on the emerging role for awake fiberoptic intubation. All patients should be evaluated for candidacy for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygen as a bridge to recovery, lung transplantation, or pulmonary endarterectomy prior to intubation. Only an experienced proceduralist who is both comfortable with high-risk intubations and the pathophysiology of dPH should perform these intubations.

The Density of Different Local Anesthetic Solutions, Opioid Adjuvants and Their Clinically Used Combinations: An Experimental Study

Various opioids are added to local anesthetic solutions for spinal anesthesia. This may change the final density of the local anestetic (LA) mixture. This effect regarding current concepts in spinal anesthesia needs to be re-evaluated. In order to re-evaluate such effects, hyperbaric and isobaric local anesthetic (LA) solutions were mixed with opioid adjuvants (A) using the equipment available in the operating room. Ten density measurements for each composition (LA-A) were performed. The density change of 0.0006 g/mL was regarded as significant. Measured densities were also compared with theoretical values calculated using Hare's. As a result, the addition of an opioid adjuvant caused a significant reduction in the final density of the LA-A solution. In hyperbaric LA mixtures, it did not change the baricity from hyperbaric to isobaric. However, the addition of highly hypobaric fentanyl 0.99360 g/mL (SD ± 0.00004) changes all isobaric LA solutions baricity to hypobaric. The comparison of measured and theoretical densities revealed significant differences (p > 0.05). However, the absolute reduction reached 0.0006 g/mL in only two LA-A compositions. We conclude that the addition of fentanyl to isobaric LA results in a hypobaric solution that may affect the distribution of the block. The inadequacy of LA-A in a clinical setting is unlikely to influence block characteristics.

Opposing responses of the rat pulmonary artery and vein to phenylephrine and other agents in vitro

Background

Different from current cognition, our study demonstrated that adrenergic receptors agonist phenylephrine significantly relaxed isolated pulmonary artery but constricted pulmonary veins. Through comparing differences in the effects of commonly used vasoactive drugs on pulmonary artery and veins, the study aimed to improve efficiency and accuracy of isolated pulmonary vascular experiments, and to provide experimental basis for clinical drug use.

Methods

The contractile responses of pulmonary arteries and veins from twelve-week-old Male Sprague-Dawley rats to phenylephrine, arginine vasopressin (AVP), U46619, endothelin-1, and potassium chloride (KCl) were recorded, as well as the relaxation in response to phenylephrine, AVP, acetylcholine. To further explore the mechanism, some vessels was also pre-incubated with adrenergic receptors antagonists propranolol, prazosin and nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor N[gamma]-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) before addition of the experimental drugs.

Results

Phenylephrine constricted pulmonary veins directly, but constricted pulmonary artery only after incubation with propranolol or/and L-NAME. The pulmonary artery exhibited significant relaxation to AVP with or without L-NAME incubation. AVP more clearly constricted the veins after incubation with L-NAME. Changes in vascular tension also varied from pulmonary artery to veins for KCl stimulation. Different from phenomena presented in veins, acetylcholine did not relax pulmonary artery preconstricted by KCl, U46619, and endothelin-1.

Conclusions

According to the results, phenylephrine, KCl, AVP, and acetylcholine could be used to distinguish pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins in vitro. This also suggested that the pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins have great differences in physiology and drug reactivity.

High Versus Normal Blood Pressure Targets in Relation to Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Management of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is challenging. Current practice predominantly is based on data from experimental and small uncontrolled studies and includes augmentation of blood pressure. However, whether such intervention is effective in the clinical setting of cardiac surgery is unknown.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single-center study in a tertiary teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 78 patients equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), classified according to PAC-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF); 44 patients had an RVEF of <20%, and 34 patients had an RVEF between ≥20% and <30%.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomly were assigned to either a normal target group (mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg) or a high target group [mean arterial pressure 85 mmHg]). The primary end- point was the change in RVEF over a one-hour study period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was no significant between-group difference in change of RVEF <20% (-1% [-3.3 to 1.8] in the normal-target group v 0.5% [-1 to 4] in the high-target group; p = 0.159). There was no significant between-group difference in change in RVEF 20%-to-30% (-1% [-3 to 0] in the normal-target group v 1% [-1 to 3] in the high-target group; p = 0.074). These results were in line with the simultaneous observation that echocardiographic variables of RV and left ventricular function also remained unaltered over time, irrespective of either baseline RVEF or treatment protocol.

CONCLUSION

In a mixed cardiac surgery population with RV dysfunction, norepinephrine-mediated high blood pressure targets did not result in an increase in PAC-derived RVEF compared with normal blood pressure targets.

Preoperative Assessment and Perioperative Management of the Patient with Pulmonary Vascular Disease

The incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has increased steadily over the past decade. Patients with known PH have significantly higher perioperative morbidity and mortality than those without PH. Moreover, a substantial number of patients may have occult disease. It, therefore, is of paramount importance for perioperative providers to recognize high-risk patients and treat them appropriately. This review first provides an overview of PH pathophysiology, then estimates the perioperative incidence of PH and its impact on surgical outcomes, and finally outlines a perioperative management strategy.

Vasopressor Therapy in Cardiac Surgery-An Experts' Consensus Statement

Hemodynamic conditions with reduced systemic vascular resistance commonly are observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and may range from moderate reductions in vascular tone, as a side effect of general anesthetics, to a profound vasodilatory syndrome, often referred to as vasoplegic shock. Therapy with vasopressors is an important pillar in the treatment of these conditions. There is limited guidance on the appropriate choice of vasopressors to restore and optimize systemic vascular tone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A panel of experts in the field convened to develop statements and evidence-based recommendations on clinically relevant questions on the use of vasopressors in cardiac surgical patients, using a critical appraisal of the literature following the GRADE system and a modified Delphi process. The authors unanimously and strongly recommend the use of norepinephrine and/or vasopressin for restoration and maintenance of systemic perfusion pressure in cardiac surgical patients; despite that, the authors cannot recommend either of these drugs with respect to the risk of ischemic complications. The authors unanimously and strongly recommend against using dopamine for treating post-cardiac surgery vasoplegic shock and against using methylene blue for purposes other than a rescue therapy. The authors unanimously and weakly recommend that clinicians consider early addition of a second vasopressor (norepinephrine or vasopressin) if adequate vascular tone cannot be restored by a monotherapy with either norepinephrine or vasopressin and to consider using vasopressin as a first-line vasopressor or to add vasopressin to norepinephrine in cardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension or right-sided heart dysfunction.

Supra-coronary aortic banding improves right ventricular function in experimental pulmonary arterial hypertension in rats by increasing systolic right coronary artery perfusion

AIM

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results in right ventricular (RV) dysfunction owing, in part, to RV ischemia. The relative contribution of RV microvascular rarefaction vs reduced right coronary artery perfusion pressure (RCA-PP) to RV ischemia remains unknown. We hypothesize that increasing RCA-PP improves RV function in PAH by increasing RV systolic perfusion.

METHODS

Supra-coronary aortic banding (SAB) or sham surgery was performed on male Sprague-Dawley rats. Seven to ten days later, rats received either monocrotaline (MCT; 60 mg/kg) or saline. After 1 month, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, ^99m Tc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and microsphere infusion studies were performed. The RV was harvested for measurement of hypertrophy (RVH), fibrosis and immunoblotting, and the lung was harvested for pulmonary artery (PA) histology.

RESULTS

Supra-coronary aortic banding increased systolic pressures in proximal aorta and systolic RCA-PP in SAB + MCT vs MCT rats (114 ± 12 vs 5 ± 9 mm Hg), without altering diastolic RCA-PP. SAB + MCT rats had improved RV function vs MCT rats, evident from their significantly increased cardiac output (CO), RV free wall (RVFW) thickening, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV-PA coupling indices. RV-PA coupling indices and CO correlated directly with systolic RCA-PP. RV perfusion was increased in SAB + MCT vs MCT rats and correlated well with CO; whereas microvascular rarefaction was unaltered. SAB + MCT rats had less RVH and fibrosis and lower PA pressures vs MCT rats. SAB + MCT rats had significantly lower RV pyruvate kinase muscle isoform 2/1 ratios than MCT rats, consistent with restoration of oxidative metabolism.

CONCLUSION

A SAB-induced increase in systolic RCA-PP improves RV perfusion and function in MCT rats. Maintaining systolic RCA perfusion can preserve RV function in PAH.

Anesthesia for Pregnant Women with Pulmonary Hypertension

Despite advances in the therapy for pulmonary hypertension over the past decades, the prognosis of pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension remains poor, with high maternal mortality. This poses a particular challenge for the mother and her medical team. In the present review, the authors have updated the classification and definition of pulmonary hypertension, summarized the current knowledge with regard to perioperative management and anesthesia considerations for these patients, and stressed the importance of a "pregnancy heart team" to improve long-term outcomes of pregnant women with pulmonary hypertension.

Management of Right Ventricular Failure in Pulmonary Embolism

Acute right ventricular failure remains the leading cause of mortality associated with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This article reviews the pathophysiology behind acute right ventricular failure and strategies for managing right ventricular failure in acute PE. Immediate clot reduction via systemic thrombolytics, catheter based procedures, or surgery is always advocated for unstable patients. While waiting to mobilize these resources, it often becomes necessary to support the RV with vasoactive medications. Clinicians should carefully assess volume status and use caution with volume resuscitation. Right ventricular assist devices may have an expanding role in the future.

Vasopressor and Inotrope Therapy in Cardiac Critical Care

Patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) are often in shock and require hemodynamic support. Identifying and addressing the pathophysiology mechanisms operating in an individual patient is crucial to achieving a successful outcome, while initiating circulatory support therapy to restore adequate tissue perfusion. Vasopressors and inotropes are the cornerstone of supportive medical therapy for shock, in addition to fluid resuscitation when indicated. Timely initiation of optimal vasopressor and inotrope therapy is essential for patients with shock, with the ultimate goals of restoring effective tissue perfusion in order to normalize cellular metabolism. Use of vasoactive agents for hemodynamic support of patients with shock should take both arterial pressure and tissue perfusion into account when choosing therapeutic interventions. For most patients with shock, including cardiogenic or septic shock, norepinephrine (NE) is an appropriate choice as a first-line vasopressor titrated to achieve an adequate arterial pressure due to a lower risk of adverse events than other catecholamine vasopressors. If tissue and organ perfusion remain inadequate, an inotrope such as dobutamine may be added to increase cardiac output to a sufficient level that meets tissue demand. Low doses of epinephrine or dopamine may be used for inotropic support, but high doses of these drugs carry an excessive risk of adverse events when used for vasopressor support and should be avoided. When NE alone is inadequate to achieve an adequate arterial pressure, addition of a noncatecholamine vasopressor such as vasopressin or angiotensin-II is reasonable, in addition to rescue therapies that may improve vasopressor responsiveness. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology and evidence-based use of vasopressor and inotrope drugs in critically ill patients, with a focus on the CICU population.

The Right Ventricle-You May Forget it, but It Will Not Forget You

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and failure are common and often overlooked causes of perioperative deterioration and adverse outcomes. Due to its unique pathophysiologic underpinnings, RV failure often does not respond to typical therapeutic measures such as volume resuscitation and often worsens when therapy is escalated and mechanical ventilation is begun, with a danger of irreversible cardiovascular collapse and death. The single most important factor in improving outcomes in the context of RV failure is anticipating and recognizing it. Once established, a vicious circle of systemic hypotension, and RV ischemia and dilation is set in motion, rapidly spiraling down into a state of shock culminating in multi-organ failure and ultimately death. Therapy of RV failure must focus on rapidly reestablishing RV coronary perfusion, lowering pulmonary vascular resistance and optimizing volemia. In parallel, underlying reversible causes should be sought and if possible treated. In all stages of diagnostics and therapy, echocardiography plays a central role. In severe cases of RV dysfunction there remains a role for the use of the pulmonary artery catheter. When these mostly simple measures are undertaken in a timely fashion, the spiral of death of RV failure can often be broken or even prevented altogether.

Levosimendan or milrinone for right ventricular inotropic treatment?-A secondary analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of milrinone and levosimendan on right ventricular (RV) inotropy and lusitropy in patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis, a procedure in which an abnormal postoperative RV function may be seen.

METHODS

In a prospective, blinded trial, 31 patients were randomized to receive either milrinone (0.4 and 0.8 µg/kg/min, n = 16) or levosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 µg/kg/min, n = 15) after AVR for aortic stenosis. RV performance, afterload (pulmonary arterial elastance), RV strain, systolic (SR-S) and early diastolic (SR-E) strain rate were measured by pulmonary artery thermodilution catheterization and transoesophageal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. To circumvent the indirect effects of inodilator-induced hemodynamic changes on RV systolic and diastolic deformation, pulmonary arterial elastance, central venous pressure and heart rate were maintained constant by atrial pacing, plasma volume expansion with colloids and phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction during treatment with the inotropes.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent increase in stroke volume index and cardiac index by approximately 20% were seen with both agents at the highest doses, with no difference between groups (P = .792 and 0.744, respectively). In both groups, RV strain and SR-S dose-dependently increased by 20% and 15%-19%, respectively, at the highest doses (P = .742 and 0.259, respectively) with no difference between groups. SR-E improved by both agents 20%-24% at the highest dose with no difference between groups (P = .714).

CONCLUSIONS

The direct RV inotropic and lusitropic effects of levosimendan and milrinone were comparable at clinically relevant infusion rates.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the ICU

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) pose a challenge to the multidisciplinary health-care team due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of their disease state and the medication considerations that must be made to appropriately manage them. PAH is a progressive disease with the majority of patients ultimately dying as a result of right ventricular (RV) failure. During an acute decompensation, patients must be appropriately managed to optimize volume status, RV function, cardiac output, and systemic perfusion, while treating the underlying cause of the exacerbation. During times of critical illness, the ability to administer medications approved for use in PAH can be impacted by end-organ damage, hemodynamic instability, new drug interactions, or available dosage forms. Balancing the multimodal treatment approach needed to manage an acute exacerbation and the pharmacokinetic and administration concerns impacting baseline PAH therapy as a result of critical illness requires an expert multiprofessional PAH team. The purpose of this review is to evaluate specific management considerations for critically ill patients with PAH in the ICU.

Predictive Value of Intraoperative Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Liver Transplantation

We aimed to evaluate the association between intraoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and clinical outcome of liver transplantation (LT). Cardiovascular involvement of end-stage liver disease is relatively common, and hemodynamic instability during LT can be fatal to recipients. However, the clinical impact of intraoperative PVR in LT remains undetermined. A total of 363 adult recipients with intraoperative right heart catheterization from January 2011 to May 2016 were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to PVR. Two separate analyses were performed according to the time point of measurement: at the beginning and at the end of LT. The primary outcome was all-cause death or graft failure during the follow-up period. Increased PVR was observed in 11.8% (43/363) of recipients at the beginning and 12.7% (46/363) of recipients at the end of LT. PVR at the beginning of LT had no significant effect on the rate of death or graft failure in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-2.38; P = 0.52). In contrast, PVR at the end of LT was significantly associated with death or graft failure during the overall follow-up period (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.13-3.54; P = 0.02). In conclusion, PVR at the end of LT, rather than the beginning, is associated with clinical outcome. Larger trials are needed to support this finding.

The Right Ventricle During Selective Lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery

The right ventricle (RV) has been an area of evolving interest after decades of being ignored and considered less important than the left ventricle. Right ventricular dysfunction/failure is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery; however, very little is known about the incidence or impact of RV dysfunction/failure in thoracic surgery. The pathophysiology of RV dysfunction/failure has been studied in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cardiac surgery, pulmonary hypertension, and left ventricular failure, but limited data exist in literature addressing the issue of RV dysfunction/failure in the context of thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation (OLV). Thoracic surgery and OLV present as a unique situation where the RV is faced with sudden changes in afterload, preload, and contractility throughout the perioperative period. The authors discuss the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms that can affect adversely the RV during OLV and introduce the term RV injury to the myocardium that is affected adversely by the various intraoperative factors, which then makes it predisposed to acute dysfunction. The most important of these mechanisms seems to be the role of intraoperative mechanical ventilation, which potentially could cause both ventilator-induced lung injury leading to ARDS and RV injury. Identification of at-risk patients in the perioperative period using focused imaging, particularly echocardiography, is paramount. The authors also discuss the various RV-protective strategies required to prevent RV dysfunction and management of established RV failure.

Comparison of Ephedrine vs. Norepinephrine in Treating Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Hypertensive Patients: Randomized Double-Blinded Study

Background

Hypotension is a common problem in general anesthesia. Maintaining the mean arterial pressure by choosing a vasopressor with minimal complications is still discussed in various surgeries.

Objectives

The aim of this study is comparison of ephedrine versus norepinephrine in treating anesthesia-induced hypotension in hypertensive patients in spinal surgery in a randomized double-blinded study.

Methods

This randomized, double-blinded study was approved by Iran University of Medical Sciences, operating room of medical center. Data collection was completed between Jan to Dec 2017. Inclusion criteria included age between 20 and 75 years, history of high blood pressure (a patient who has been treated for maximum 5 years with a anti hypertensive medication), and patients under general anesthesia in spinal surgery. The exclusion criteria were based on American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3 or higher, history of arrhythmia, heart valve disease, cerebrovascular disease, kidney failure, beta-blocker use and diabetes, as well as intra operative massive blood loss. After initiation of anesthesia, when the pressure reaches less than 60, the patient entered the protocol and simultaneously administration of 5 mL/kg serum crystalloid and vasopressor. Patients were randomized to the ephedrine group (n = 28) who received 5 mg ephedrine intravenous (i.v.) or norepinephrine Group (n = 28) who received 10 µg (i.v.) bolus norepinephrine at anesthesia-induced hypotension. The administration of 5 mL/kg serum crystalloid and vasopressor was simultaneous. If the mean arterial pressure (MAP) had not reached 60 mmHg, the same dose should be repeated at a maximum of three or more times at five-minute intervals in the ephedrine group and at two minutes intervals in the norepinephrine group. All parameters were collected before and at the end of administration anesthesia drug and during episodes of hypotension. Hemodynamic variables, frequency of hypotension, and total number of vasopressors doses during anesthesia were recorded and analyzed.

Results

The mean number of hypotension times, the number of vasopressors doses in the first hypotension, the total number of doses consumed during the anesthesia, and heart rate at the end of anesthesia were lower in the norepinephrine group (P) respectively. MAP, 5 minutes after the first episode of hypotension and MAP at the end of anesthesia were higher in norepinephrine group.

Conclusions

Norepinephrine is more effective than ephedrine in maintenance of MAP in hypertensive patients undergoing spinal surgery under general anesthesia.

Acute Right Ventricular Failure Postintubation in a Mitral Stenosis Patient

Mitral stenosis (MS) is prevalent in 0.02-0.2% of the population in developed countries. The pathophysiology of MS results in elevated left atrial pressures and over-time results in pulmonary hypertension (HTN) which ultimately affects the right ventricle. In addition, MS restricts the diastolic filling of the left ventricle. Therefore, during induction patients with MS are limited by their ability to increase cardiac output by increasing stroke volume. Anesthesia goals in severe MS are to avoid sudden changes in heart rate, as well as systemic and pulmonary artery pressures. We report a patient who sustained severe hypotension upon induction and intubation which was resistant to conventional medications. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography displayed unique right atrial and right ventricular dilatation. In addition, the leftward inter-ventricular, inter-atrial septal shift and septal bounce were noted as the characteristic findings. Intravenous epinephrine bolus was administered to achieve normo-tension and normal chamber dimensions and interventricular septal position.

Hospital and intensive care unit management of decompensated pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure

Pulmonary hypertension and concomitant right ventricular failure present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the intensive care unit and have been associated with a high mortality. Significant co-morbidities and hemodynamic instability are often present, and routine critical care unit resuscitation may worsen hemodynamics and limit the chances of survival in patients with an already underlying poor prognosis. Right ventricular failure results from structural or functional processes that limit the right ventricle’s ability to maintain adequate cardiac output. It is commonly seen as the result of left heart failure, acute pulmonary embolism, progression or decompensation of pulmonary hypertension, sepsis, acute lung injury, or in the perioperative setting. Prompt recognition of the underlying cause and institution of treatment with a thorough understanding of the elements necessary to optimize preload, cardiac contractility, enhance systemic arterial perfusion, and reduce right ventricular afterload are of paramount importance. Moreover, the emergence of previously uncommon entities in patients with pulmonary hypertension (pregnancy, sepsis, liver disease, etc.) and the availability of modern devices to provide support pose additional challenges that must be addressed with an in-depth knowledge of this disease.

Focused Review of Perioperative Care of Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension and Proposal of a Perioperative Pathway

Morbidity and mortality risk increase considerably for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, there are no comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for perioperative evaluation and management of these patients. We present a brief review of the literature on perioperative outcomes for patients with PH and describe the implementation of a collaborative perioperative management program for these high-risk patients at a tertiary academic center.

Acute Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Intensive Care Unit

The role of the left ventricle in ICU patients with circulatory shock has long been considered. However, acute right ventricle (RV) dysfunction causes and aggravates many common critical diseases (acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, and postoperative cardiac surgery). Several supportive therapies, including mechanical ventilation and fluid management, can make RV dysfunction worse, potentially exacerbating shock. We briefly review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and recommendations to guide management of acute RV dysfunction in ICU patients. Our aim is to clarify the complex effects of mechanical ventilation, fluid therapy, vasoactive drug infusions, and other therapies to resuscitate the critical patient optimally.

Perioperative Care of the Patient With the Total Artificial Heart

Advanced heart failure continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite improvements in pharmacologic therapy. High demand for cardiac transplantation and shortage of donor organs have led to an increase in the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices. The total artificial heart is an effective biventricular assist device that may be used as a bridge to transplant and that is being studied for destination therapy. This review discusses the history, indications, and perioperative management of the total artificial heart with emphasis on the postoperative concerns.

Norepinephrine reduces arterial compliance less than phenylephrine when treating general anesthesia-induced arterial hypotension

INTRODUCTION

During general anesthesia, arterial hypotension is frequent and may be an important contributor to perioperative morbidity. We assessed the effect of a 5 μg bolus of Norepinephrine (NA) when compared with 50 μg bolus of Phenylephrine (PE) administered to treat hypotension during maintenance anesthesia, on MAP, derived cardiac output and arterial stiffness parameters.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for a neurosurgical procedure under general anesthesia were prospectively included. Monitoring included invasive blood pressure, esophageal Doppler, and arterial tonometer used to estimate central aortic pressure with arterial stiffness parameters, such as augmentation index (Aix). After initial resuscitation, hypotensive episodes were corrected by a bolus administration of NA or PE in a peripheral venous line.

RESULTS

There were 269 bolus administrations of vasopressors (149 NA, 120 PE) in 47 patients with no adverse effects detected. A decrease in stroke volume (SV) was observed with PE compared with NA (-18 ± 9% vs. -14 ± 7%, P < 0.001). This decrease was associated with an increase in Aix, which was greater for PE than for NA (+10 ± 8% vs. +6 ± 6%, P < 0.0001), and a decrease in total arterial compliance greater for PE compared to NA (Ctot = SV/Central Pulse Pressure) (-35 ± 9% vs. -29 ± 10%, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that 5 μg of NA administered as a bolus in a peripheral venous line could treat general anesthesia-induced arterial hypotension with a smaller decrease in SV and arterial compliance when compared to PE.

The Right Ventricle in ARDS

ARDS is associated with poor clinical outcomes, with a pooled mortality rate of approximately 40% despite best standards of care. Current therapeutic strategies are based on improving oxygenation and pulmonary compliance while minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. It has been demonstrated that relative hypoxemia can be well tolerated, and improvements in oxygenation do not necessarily translate into survival benefit. Cardiac failure, in particular right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), is commonly encountered in moderate to severe ARDS and is reported to be one of the major determinants of mortality. The prevalence rate of echocardiographically evident RVD in ARDS varies across studies, ranging from 22% to 50%. Although there is no definitive causal relationship between RVD and mortality, severe RVD is associated with increased mortality. Factors that can adversely affect RV function include hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, hypercapnia, and invasive ventilation with high driving pressure. It might be expected that early diagnosis of RVD would be of benefit; however, echocardiographic markers (qualitative and quantitative) used to prospectively evaluate the right ventricle in ARDS have not been tested in adequately powered studies. In this review, we examine the prognostic implications and pathophysiology of RVD in ARDS and discuss available diagnostic modalities and treatment options. We aim to identify gaps in knowledge and directions for future research that could potentially improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Vasopressors induce passive pulmonary hypertension by blood redistribution from systemic to pulmonary circulation

Vasopressors are widely used in resuscitation, ventricular failure, and sepsis, and often induce pulmonary hypertension with undefined mechanisms. We hypothesize that vasopressor-induced pulmonary hypertension is caused by increased pulmonary blood volume and tested this hypothesis in dogs under general anesthesia. In normal hearts (model 1), phenylephrine (2.5 μg/kg/min) transiently increased right but decreased left cardiac output, associated with increased pulmonary blood volume (63% ± 11.8, P = 0.007) and pressures in the left atrium, pulmonary capillary, and pulmonary artery. However, the trans-pulmonary gradient and pulmonary vascular resistance remained stable. These changes were absent after decreasing blood volume or during right cardiac dysfunction to reduce pulmonary blood volume (model 2). During double-ventricle bypass (model 3), phenylephrine (1, 2.5 and 10 μg/kg/min) only slightly induced pulmonary vasoconstriction. Vasopressin (1U and 2U) dose-dependently increased pulmonary artery pressure (52 ± 8.4 and 71 ± 10.3%), but did not cause pulmonary vasoconstriction in normally beating hearts (model 1). Pulmonary artery and left atrial pressures increased during left ventricle dysfunction (model 4), and further increased after phenylephrine injection by 31 ± 5.6 and 43 ± 7.5%, respectively. In conclusion, vasopressors increased blood volume in the lung with minimal pulmonary vasoconstriction. Thus, this pulmonary hypertension is similar to the hemodynamic pattern observed in left heart diseases and is passive, due to redistribution of blood from systemic to pulmonary circulation. Understanding the underlying mechanisms may improve clinical management of patients who are taking vasopressors, especially those with coexisting heart disease.

Management of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Operating Room

Pulmonary artery hypertension is defined as persistent elevation of mean pulmonary artery pressure > 25 mm Hg with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 15 mm Hg or elevation of exercise mean pulmonary artery pressure > 35 mm Hg. Although mild pulmonary hypertension rarely impacts anesthetic management, severe pulmonary hypertension and exacerbation of moderate hypertension can lead to acute right ventricular failure and cardiogenic shock. Knowledge of anesthetic drug effects on the pulmonary circulation is essential for anesthesiologists. Intraoperative management should include prevention of exacerbating factors such as hypoxemia, hypercarbia, acidosis, hypothermia, hypervolemia, and increased intrathoracic pressure; monitoring and optimizing right ventricular function; and treatment with selective pulmonary vasodilators. Recent advances in pharmacology provide anesthesiologists with a wide variety of options for selective pulmonary vasodilatation. Pulmonary hypertension is a major determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality in special situations such as heart and lung transplantation, pneumonectomy, and ventricular assist device placement.

Searching for baseline blood pressure: A comparison of blood pressure at three different care points

A common approach to blood pressure management in the operating room is to keep the intraoperative, pressures within 20% of baseline blood pressure. One question that arises from this recommendation is; what is a patient's true baseline blood pressure? In order to get a more precise definition of baseline blood pressure, a comparison of the first operating room blood pressure was made with the blood pressure taken in a preoperative holding area before surgery, and the blood pressure taken in pre-surgical testing. (before day of surgery). A database of 2087 adult general anesthesia cases was generated, which contained the blood pressure (BP) in the pre-surgical testing clinic, the first BP in preoperative holding on the day of surgery, and the first BP in the operating room. Comparisons were made between the blood pressures taken at each phase of care. All components of BP taken in the OR were statistically significantly higher (p<0.001 for all comparisons) than in either PST or the holding area, while the BP in the latter locations were not significantly different. This blood pressure difference persists whether or not the patient is taking antihypertensive medications. The higher blood pressure measured in the operating rooms precludes using this measurement to determine baseline blood pressure. Blood pressures taken prior to arrival in the operating room are similar to blood pressures taken before the day of surgery. Blood pressure measurements taken prior to entrance in the operating room can be used to determine baseline blood pressure.