Unwanted effects of morphine-6-glucoronide and morphine

The Influence of Pharmacogenetic Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Morphine and Its Metabolites in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Morphine is a potent analgesic used for treating surgical and cancer pain. Despite being the drug of choice for the management of severe pain in children, the high interindividual variability in morphine pharmacokinetics limits its clinical utility to effectively relieve pain without adverse effects. This review was conducted to identify and describe all studies that have assessed the effect of genetic factors on the pharmacokinetics of morphine and its main metabolites in children. Embase and Medline databases were used to conduct the literature search, and the systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of the 188 articles screened and after the application of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review identified 8 studies. These studies suggest that genetic variants of selected metabolic enzymes and transporters may play a role in the observed interindividual variability in morphine plasma concentrations. Variants of the genes SLC22A1 and ABCC3 had the most supporting evidence for genetic variants that influence morphine and morphine metabolites pharmacokinetics. Although the available evidence suggests a potential genetic contribution to the variability in morphine concentration, the heterogeneity of the included studies in terms of experimental design and small sample sizes in some studies makes it challenging to propose the use of genetic biomarkers to personalize morphine dosing. This underscores the need to conduct more comprehensive and large-scale pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic studies to determine how or if genetic testing can optimize morphine safety and effectiveness in children.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia and side effects in pediatric laparoscopic surgery with morphine and nalbuphine

There is currently no consensus on the optimal perioperative pain management strategy involving specific opioids. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia, the associated side effects between nalbuphine and morphine in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery. One hundred ninety children were randomly assigned to nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) or morphine (0.2 mg/kg). Nalbuphine's analgesic effect was non-inferior to morphine, with similar total rescue analgesic consumption during PACU stay (0.03 ± 0.05mg vs. 0.04 ± 0.06 mg, p > 0.05). Nalbuphine group had a lower incidence of respiratory depression (RR ≤ 10/min) (4.8% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001), PONV (2.4% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.002), and pruritus (0% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001) than morphine. Additionally, nalbuphine showed a shorter laryngeal mask airway removal time (13.9 [12.7, 15.1]) compared with morphine (17.0 [15.1, 18.9], p = 0.011). Nalbuphine provides equipotent analgesia with significantly lower incidences of respiratory depression, PONV, and pruritus compared with morphine in pediatric laparoscopic surgery.

Heroin and its metabolites: relevance to heroin use disorder

Heroin is an opioid agonist commonly abused for its rewarding effects. Since its synthesis at the end of the nineteenth century, its popularity as a recreational drug has ebbed and flowed. In the last three decades, heroin use has increased again, and yet the pharmacology of heroin is still poorly understood. After entering the body, heroin is rapidly deacetylated to 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), which is then deacetylated to morphine. Thus, drug addiction literature has long settled on the notion that heroin is little more than a pro-drug. In contrast to these former views, we will argue for a more complex interplay among heroin and its active metabolites: 6-MAM, morphine, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). In particular, we propose that the complex temporal pattern of heroin effects results from the sequential, only partially overlapping, actions not only of 6-MAM, morphine, and M6G, but also of heroin per se, which, therefore, should not be seen as a mere brain-delivery system for its active metabolites. We will first review the literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of heroin and its metabolites, then examine their neural and behavioral effects, and finally discuss the possible implications of these data for a better understanding of opioid reward and heroin addiction. By so doing we hope to highlight research topics to be investigated by future clinical and pre-clinical studies.

Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and adeno-associated viral vector on morphine-induced condition through target concentration changes in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens

Morphine remains the standard analgesic for severe pain. However, the clinical use of morphine is limited by the innate tendency of opiates to become addictive. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a growth factor that is protective against many mental disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the protective function of BDNF on morphine addiction based on the behavioural sensitisation (BS) model and assess potential changes in downstream molecular tropomyosin-related kinase receptor B (TrkB) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) expression caused by overexpression of BDNF. We divided 64 male C57BL/6 J mice into saline, morphine, morphine plus adeno-associated viral vector (AAV), and morphine plus BDNF groups. After administering the treatments, behavioural tests were conducted during the development and expression phases of BS, followed by a western blot analysis. All data were analysed by one- or two-way analysis of variance. The overexpression of BDNF in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) caused by BDNF-AAV injection decreased the total distance of locomotion in mice who underwent morphine-induced BS and increased the concentrations of BDNF, TrkB, and CREB in the VTA and nucleus accumbens (NAc). BDNF exerts protective effects against morphine-induced BS by altering target gene expression in the VTA and NAc.

Is Prevention of Postoperative Vomiting Surgery Dependent? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty

The study of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has been ongoing since the early days of general anesthesia. The search for risk factors of PONV and the development of new agents to treat PONV are the two main strategies to combat the adverse side effects of general anesthesia. Female sex, non-smoking status, a history of PONV/motion sickness, and postoperative opioid use are the four independent risk factors for PONV derived after a series of prospective studies, evidence-based systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. The two frequently asked questions that arise ask whether risk factors apply to different clinical settings and whether prevention measures of PONV can be surgery dependent. We conducted a comprehensive review of 665 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January and December 2019. As nausea is subjective and its measurement is not standardized, postoperative vomiting (POV) was used as a study endpoint. The exclusion criteria were desflurane anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, anesthesia without bispectral index monitoring, and day surgery. Three well-recognized risk factors, consisting of body weight, sevoflurane consumption, and postoperative opioid consumption, were not considered as independent risk factors of POV, while female sex, preoperative adductor canal block (ACB), and dexamethasone were identified as being so in this study. The risk of POV in the female sex was 2.49 times that in the male sex; however, when dexamethasone was used, this risk was reduced by >40% compared with no antiemetic use, and by >50% when patients received preoperative ACB compared with those without the block. The clinical characteristics of our TKA patients—female dominance, old age, and their fairly constant body weights that were distinct from those of other surgical patients—suggested that age may play a crucial role in determining the relative contributions of the different risk factors of POV. We concluded that risk factors of POV are dependent on clinical settings. Based on these results, it is reasonable to speculate that a surgery-dependent plan for the prevention of POV is feasible for patients in similar clinical settings.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Vomiting in the Eye of "Real-World Evidence"-Modifiable and Clinical Setting-Dependent Risk Factors in Surgical Trauma Patients

Numerous studies on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have been carried out since the early days of contemporary surgery. The incidence of PONV has been greatly reduced in recent years and new drugs for PONV keep evolving in the market; however, a substantial number of patients are still under the threat of PONV. Female gender, non-smokers, a history of PONV/motion sickness, and postoperative opioid use are four well-recognized risk factors of PONV. Many potential risk factors reported in previous studies were not consistently presented as predictors for PONV. Two questions then arise; are risk factors clinical setting dependent and are risk factors modifiable? We attempted to answer the questions through a comprehensive review of perioperative records of surgical patients from the Trauma Department of our hospital. As nausea is subjective and no standard is applicable for its measurement, postoperative vomiting (POV) was used as an endpoint in this study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address the POV issue in surgical trauma patients. A total of 855 patients were enrolled in this study after excluding age below 20 years old, total intravenous anesthesia, desflurane anesthesia, or records with missing data. Our results showed that female gender (OR 4.89) is the strongest predicting factor, followed by a less potent predicting factor—more intraoperative opioid consumption (OR 1.07)—which favor more POV. More intraoperative crystalloid supply (OR 0.71) and a higher body weight (OR 0.9) favor less POV. Other potential risk factors did not reach statistical significance in this study as independent risk factors. Our results also showed that when the intraoperative crystalloid infusion rate is greater than 4 mL/kg/h (OR 0.20), it favors a lower rate of POV; when intraoperative opioid consumption is greater than 12 mg morphine equivalents, MME (OR 1.87), it favors a higher rate of POV. We concluded that dominance of any independent risk factor over other risk factors depends on how individual factors interact with the clinical setting. Some risk factors could be modified, and a cut-off value could be derived to facilitate a better plan for POV prevention.

Neuronal and glial factors contributing to sex differences in opioid modulation of pain

Morphine remains one of the most widely prescribed opioids for alleviation of persistent and/or severe pain; however, multiple preclinical and clinical studies report that morphine is less efficacious in females compared to males. Morphine primarily binds to the mu opioid receptor, a prototypical G-protein coupled receptor densely localized in the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Anatomical and physiological studies conducted in the 1960s identified the periaqueductal gray, and its descending projections to the rostral ventromedial medulla and spinal cord, as an essential descending inhibitory circuit mediating opioid-based analgesia. Remarkably, the majority of studies published over the following 30 years were conducted in males with the implicit assumption that the anatomical and physiological characteristics of this descending inhibitory circuit were comparable in females; not surprisingly, this is not the case. Several factors have since been identified as contributing to the dimorphic effects of opioids, including sex differences in the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological characteristics of the descending inhibitory circuit and its modulation by gonadal steroids. Recent data also implicate sex differences in opioid metabolism and neuroimmune signaling as additional contributing factors. Here we cohesively present these lines of evidence demonstrating a neural basis for sex differences in opioid modulation of pain, with a focus on the PAG as a sexually dimorphic core of descending opioid-induced inhibition and argue for the development of sex-specific pain therapeutics.

Sex-dependent influences of morphine and its metabolites on pain sensitivity in the rat

Preclinical studies report that the effective dose for morphine is approximately 2-fold higher in females than males. Following systemic administration, morphine is metabolized via Phase II glucuronidation in the liver and brain into two active metabolites: morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), each possessing distinct pharmacological profiles. M6G binds to μ opioid receptors and acts as a potent analgesic. In contrast, M3G binds to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), initiating a neuroinflammatory response that directly opposes the analgesic effects of morphine and M6G. M3G serum concentrations are 2-fold higher in females than males, however, sex-specific effects of morphine metabolites on analgesia and glial activation in vivo remain unknown. The present studies test the hypothesis that increased M3G, and subsequent TLR4-mediated activation of glia, is a primary mechanism driving the attenuated response to morphine in females. We demonstrate that intra-PAG M6G results in a greater analgesic response in females than morphine alone. M6G analgesia was reversed with co-administration of (-)-naloxone, but not (+)-naloxone, suggesting that this effect is μ opioid receptor mediated. In contrast, intra-PAG administration of M3G significantly attenuated the analgesic effects of systemic morphine in males only, increasing the 50% effective dose of morphine two-fold (5.0 vs 10.3mg/kg) and eliminating the previously observed sex difference. An increase in IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF was observed in females following intra-PAG morphine or M6G. In males, only IL-1β levels increased following morphine. Changes in cytokine levels following M3G were limited to TNF in females. Together, these data implicate sex differences in morphine metabolism, specifically M3G, as a contributing factor in the attenuated response to morphine observed in females.

The role of mu opioid receptors in psychomotor stimulation and conditioned place preference induced by morphine-6-glucuronide

Previous studies have shown that morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), a metabolite of morphine, induces reward and psychomotor stimulation but the role of the mu opioid receptor in these actions of the drug is not fully characterized. Thus, using mice lacking exon-2 of the mu opioid receptor and their wild-type littermates/controls, we determined the role of this receptor in psychomotor stimulation, sensitization, and conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by M6G. For comparison, we also assessed the role of the mu opioid receptor in the rewarding action of morphine. For the measurement of locomotor activity and sensitization, mice were habituated to motor activity chambers for 1h, then injected with M6G (10mg/kg) and locomotor activity was recorded for an additional 1h. The same treatment was given for five days and mice were tested for sensitization a week later. For the CPP experiments, mice were tested for baseline place preference on day 1, then received single or repeated alternate-day saline/drug or drug/saline conditioning and tested for CPP the following day. Mice were also tested for CPP under a drugged state. M6G induced psychomotor stimulation, a response that was enhanced upon repeated administration of the drug, showing that locomotor sensitization developed to the motor stimulatory action of M6G. However, M6G induced a weaker CPP response compared to morphine. None of these actions of M6G was detected in mice lacking the mu opioid receptor. Together, the current results suggest that M6G induces psychomotor stimulation and a weaker rewarding action via the mu opioid receptor.

The metabolism of opioid agents and the clinical impact of their active metabolites

BACKGROUND

The metabolism of opioids is critical to consider for multiple reasons. The most commonly prescribed opioid agents often have metabolites that are active and are the source of both analgesic activity and an increased incidence of adverse events. Many opioids are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes and inhibition or induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes by coadministered drugs may significantly impact the systemic concentration of opioids and their metabolites and the associated efficacy or adverse events.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of the metabolism of various opioids that will highlight the impact of their active metabolites, and the potential impact of cytochrome P450 activity on analgesic activity.

RESULTS

An understanding of "opioid metabolic machinery," cytochrome P450 activity, and drug-drug interactions in the context of opioid selection may benefit clinicians and patients alike.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater appreciation of the metabolism of commonly prescribed opioid analgesics and the impact of their active metabolites on efficacy and safety may aid prescribers in tailoring care for optimal outcomes.

A systematic review of the use of opioid medication for those with moderate to severe cancer pain and renal impairment: a European Palliative Care Research Collaborative opioid guidelines project

BACKGROUND

Opioid use in patients with renal impairment can lead to increased adverse effects. Opioids differ in their effect in renal impairment in both efficacy and tolerability. This systematic literature review forms the basis of guidelines for opioid use in renal impairment and cancer pain as part of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative's opioid guidelines project.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify and assess the quality of evidence for the safe and effective use of opioids for the relief of cancer pain in patients with renal impairment and to produce guidelines.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MedLine, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched in addition to hand searching of relevant journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they reported a clinical outcome relevant to the use of selected opioids in cancer-related pain and renal impairment. The selected opioids were morphine, diamorphine, codeine, dextropropoxyphene, dihydrocodeine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, buprenorphine, tramadol, alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, remifentanil, pethidine and methadone. No direct comparator was required for inclusion. Studies assessing the long-term efficacy of opioids during dialysis were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

This is a narrative systematic review and no meta-analysis was performed. The Grading of RECOMMENDATIONS Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of the studies and to formulate guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen original articles were identified. Eight prospective and seven retrospective clinical studies were identified but no randomized controlled trials. No results were found for diamorphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine, buprenorphine, tramadol, dextropropoxyphene, methadone or remifentanil.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the studies identified have a significant risk of bias inherent in the study methodology and there is additional significant risk of publication bias. Overall evidence is of very low quality. The direct clinical evidence in cancer-related pain and renal impairment is insufficient to allow formulation of guidelines but is suggestive of significant differences in risk between opioids.

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS regarding opioid use in renal impairment and cancer pain are made on the basis of pharmacokinetic data, extrapolation from non-cancer pain studies and from clinical experience. The risk of opioid use in renal impairment is stratified according to the activity of opioid metabolites, potential for accumulation and reports of successful or harmful use. Fentanyl, alfentanil and methadone are identified, with caveats, as the least likely to cause harm when used appropriately. Morphine may be associated with toxicity in patients with renal impairment. Unwanted side effects with morphine may be satisfactorily dealt with by either increasing the dosing interval or reducing the 24 hour dose or by switching to an alternative opioid.

Opioid metabolism

Clinicians understand that individual patients differ in their response to specific opioid analgesics and that patients may require trials of several opioids before finding an agent that provides effective analgesia with acceptable tolerability. Reasons for this variability include factors that are not clearly understood, such as allelic variants that dictate the complement of opioid receptors and subtle differences in the receptor-binding profiles of opioids. However, altered opioid metabolism may also influence response in terms of efficacy and tolerability, and several factors contributing to this metabolic variability have been identified. For example, the risk of drug interactions with an opioid is determined largely by which enzyme systems metabolize the opioid. The rate and pathways of opioid metabolism may also be influenced by genetic factors, race, and medical conditions (most notably liver or kidney disease). This review describes the basics of opioid metabolism as well as the factors influencing it and provides recommendations for addressing metabolic issues that may compromise effective pain management. Articles cited in this review were identified via a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. Articles selected for inclusion discussed general physiologic aspects of opioid metabolism, metabolic characteristics of specific opioids, patient-specific factors influencing drug metabolism, drug interactions, and adverse events.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide after oral and intravenous administration of morphine in children with cancer

The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) in children with cancer. Serum concentrations of morphine and M6G in children who received single oral or short term continuous intravenous morphine were determined by HPLC and ELISA assays, respectively. The serum C(max) of morphine and M6G after i.v. morphine administration was 560.5 and 309.0 nM and the T(max) was 61 and 65 min, respectively. The elimination half-life was 140.0 and 328.7 min, respectively. After oral administration of morphine, the serum C(max) of morphine and M6G was 408.34 and 256.3 nM and the T(max) was 40.0 and 60 min, respectively. The half-life was 131.0 and 325.8 min, respectively. The side effects were: drowsiness (100%), nausea and/or vomiting (57%), pruritus (28%) and urinary retention (14%). There were no reports of respiratory complications. This study showed that pharmacokinetics factors of morphine and M6G in children were significantly different from adults. Therefore the required dose for children should be different from that of adults and should be based on studies performed on children rather than on studies on adults. Some adverse effects, particularly nausea and pruritus, may be commoner than is usually thought, while others, particularly respiratory problems did not occur.

Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids

The opioid class of drugs, a large group, is mainly used for the treatment of acute and chronic persistent pain. All are eliminated from the body via metabolism involving principally CYP3A4 and the highly polymorphic CYP2D6, which markedly affects the drug's function, and by conjugation reactions mainly by UGT2B7. In many cases, the resultant metabolites have the same pharmacological activity as the parent opioid; however in many cases, plasma metabolite concentrations are too low to make a meaningful contribution to the overall clinical effects of the parent drug. These metabolites are invariably more water soluble and require renal clearance as an important overall elimination pathway. Such metabolites have the potential to accumulate in the elderly and in those with declining renal function with resultant accumulation to a much greater extent than the parent opioid. The best known example is the accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine. Some opioids have active metabolites but at different target sites. These are norpethidine, a neurotoxic agent, and nordextropropoxyphene, a cardiotoxic agent. Clinicians need to be aware that many opioids have active metabolites that will become therapeutically important, for example in cases of altered pathology, drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Thus, dose individualisation and the avoidance of adverse effects of opioids due to the accumulation of active metabolites or lack of formation of active metabolites are important considerations when opioids are used.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: potency and safety compared with morphine

BACKGROUND

In contemporary medicine, morphine remains the drug of choice in the treatment of severe postoperative pain. Nevertheless, morphine has several side effects, which can seriously compromise its analgesic effectiveness and the patient safety/compliance. The search for opioid analgesics with a better side-effect profile than morphine has led to a morphine metabolites, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the current paper are to give an overview of the analgesic properties of M6G, assess the dose range at which it produces equianalgesia to morphine and explore its side-effect profile.

METHODS

A review of published clinical studies (Phase II - III) on M6G in the treatment of experimental and clinical pain is given.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

M6G > 0.2 mg/kg is an effective analgesic with a slower onset but longer duration of action (> 12 h) compared with morphine. Side effects, most importantly postoperative nausea and vomiting, occur less frequent after M6G treatment. M6G is an attractive alternative to morphine in the treatment of severe postoperative pain.

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) for postoperative pain relief

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is morphine's active metabolite acting at the mu-opioid receptor. Recent experimental human studies and 5 of 6 randomized clinical trials indicate that M6G causes adequate and long lasting pain relief comparable to morphine. There are various observations that M6G is associated with a reduction in the severity of side effects normally associated with opioid use, such as reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and reduced respiratory depression. The present drug profile provides a review of the pharmacological properties of M6G, the clinical evidence relating to its efficacy and safety, and discusses its future role in the treatment of postoperative pain.

Pharmacokinetics of morphine-6-glucuronide following oral administration in healthy volunteers

AIM

After oral administration, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) displays an atypical absorption profile with two peak plasma concentrations. A proposed explanation is that M6G is hydrolysed to morphine in the colon, which is then absorbed and subsequently undergoes metabolism in the liver to morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and M6G. The aims of this study were to confirm and elucidate the biphasic absorption profile as well as clarify the conversion of M6G to morphine after a single oral administration of M6G in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

The study was conducted accordingly to a nonblinded, randomised, balanced three-way crossover design in eight healthy male subjects. The subjects received 200 mg oral M6G, 50 mg oral M6G and 30 mg oral morphine. Blood samples were collected until 72 h after M6G administration and until 9 h after morphine administration. Paracetamol and sulfasalazine were coadministered with M6G as markers for the gut contents reaching the duodenum and colon, respectively.

RESULTS

The plasma concentration peaks of M6G were seen at 4.0 (2.0-6.0) and 18 (12.0-24.0) h after 200 mg M6G and at 3.5 (2.0-6.0) and 21.3 (10.0-23.3) h after 50 mg M6G, which was in agreement with previously published results. The K(M6G_abs)/K(M6G_M6G) ratio was found to be 10.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic profile of M6G after oral administration was confirmed and with the presence of M3G and morphine in plasma after oral administration of M6G, proof seems to be found of the constant and prolonged absorption of M6G. The K(M6G_abs)/K(M6G_M6G) ratio of 10 indicates that the second absorption peak of M6G consists of approximately 10 times more absorbed M6G than reglucuronidated M6G. However, further studies are required to determine the precise kinetics of the second absorption peak.

Different effects of morphine and morphine-6β-glucuronide on formalin-evoked spinal glutamate release in conscious and freely moving rats

The aim of this study was to investigate comparatively the role of spinal glutamate in the antinociceptive effect of morphine and morphine-6beta-glucuronide (M6G). The glutamate concentration in the spinal microdialysates and flinching behavior were simultaneously measured in conscious and freely moving rats after the intraplanter injection of formalin. The subcutaneous administration of morphine (0.3-3mg/kg) in these rats suppressed dose dependently both flinching behavior and spinal glutamate release induced by formalin. Similarly, the subcutaneous administration of M6G at doses of 0.1-3mg/kg suppressed the formalin-induced flinching behavior in the dose-dependent manner, but it did not cause a dose-related inhibition of spinal glutamate release. The inhibitory effects of morphine on the formalin-induced flinching behavior and spinal glutamate release were markedly attenuated by repeated treatment with this drug for 5 days in rats. Thus, there was a significant (P<0.05) correlation between antinociception and inhibitory effect on glutamate release of morphine in rats. These results suggest a significant difference between morphine and M6G in the participation of spinal glutamate for the antinociceptive effect.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study of IV Morphine-6-Glucuronide for Postoperative Pain Relief After Knee Replacement Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose-response effect of intravenous morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) on acute postoperative pain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing knee replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 single intravenous M6G doses, 0 (placebo), 10, 20, or 30 mg/70 kg, administered 150 minutes after the spinal anesthetic was given. Analgesic effects were evaluated by determining the cumulative patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine dose, consumed over a 12 and 24 hours period, after the initial dose of M6G. For pain assessments, a 10 cm visual analog scale was used.

RESULTS

Data from 41 patients were evaluated (n=10, 10, 10, and 11 in the 0, 10, 20, and 30 mg M6G groups). Only at the highest M6G dose (30 mg/70 kg), morphine PCA consumption was significantly less compared with placebo: over the first 12 postoperative hours mean PCA morphine consumption was 3.0+/-2.0 mg/h after placebo and 1.4+/-0.5 mg/h after 30 mg M6G (P=0.03); over the first 24 h mean PCA morphine consumption was 2.5+/-2.1 mg after placebo and 1.0+/-0.4 mg after 30 mg M6G (P=0.04) (mean+/-SD). Visual analog scale values were similar across all groups during these time periods.

DISCUSSION

The analgesic effect of M6G in postoperative pain was demonstrated with 30 mg/70 kg M6G superior to placebo. At this dose, M6G has a long duration of action as determined by a reduction in the use of morphine PCA over 12 and 24 hours.

Blood-brain distribution of morphine-6-glucuronide in sheep

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

At present there are few data regarding the rate and extent of brain-blood partitioning of the opioid active metabolite of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). In this study the cerebral kinetics of M6G were determined, after a short-term intravenous infusion, in chronically instrumented conscious sheep.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Five sheep received an intravenous infusion of M6G 2.2 mg kg(-1) over a four-minute period. Non-linear mixed-effects analysis, with hybrid physiologically based kinetic models, was used to estimate cerebral kinetics from the arterio-sagittal sinus concentration gradients and cerebral blood flow measurements.

KEY RESULTS

A membrane limited model was selected as the final model. The blood-brain equilibration of M6G was relatively slow (time to reach 50% equilibration of the deep compartment 5.8 min), with low membrane permeability (PS, population mean, 2.5 ml min(-1)) from the initial compartment (V1, 13.7 ml) to a small deep distribution volume (V2) of 18.4 ml. There was some between-animal variability (%CV) in the initial distribution volume (29%), but this was not identified for PS or V2.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Pharmacokinetic modelling of M6G showed a delayed equilibration between brain and blood of a nature that is primarily limited by permeability across the blood-brain-barrier, in accordance with its physico-chemical properties.

Morphine-6-Glucuronide: Morphine??s Successor for Postoperative Pain Relief?

In searching for an analgesic with fewer side effects than morphine, examination of morphine's active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), suggests that M6G is possibly such a drug. In contrast to morphine, M6G is not metabolized but excreted via the kidneys and exhibits enterohepatic cycling, as it is a substrate for multidrug resistance transporter proteins in the liver and intestines. M6G exhibits a delay in its analgesic effect (blood-effect site equilibration half-life 4-8 h), which is partly related to slow passage through the blood-brain barrier and distribution within the brain compartment. In humans, M6G's potency is just half of that of morphine. In clinical studies, M6G is well tolerated and produces adequate and long lasting postoperative analgesia. At analgesic doses, M6G causes similar reduction of the ventilatory response to CO2 as an equianalgesic dose of morphine but significantly less depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Preliminary data indicate that M6G is associated less than morphine with nausea and vomiting, causing 50% and 75% less nausea in postoperative and experimental settings, respectively. Although the data from the literature are very promising, we believe that more studies are necessary before we may conclude that M6G is superior to morphine for postoperative analgesia.

Role of morphine's metabolites in analgesia: concepts and controversies

The metabolites of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), have been extensively studied for their contribution to clinical effects following administration of morphine. Those contributions to both the desired effect (ie, analgesia) and the undesired effects (eg, nausea, respiratory depression) are the subject of clinical controversy. Much attention and effort have been directed at investigating the properties of M6G because of interest in this substance as a possible substitute for morphine. It exhibits increased potency and the possibility of a better side effect profile compared with morphine, although the reported relative benefits vary widely. M3G is not analgesic, but its role in producing side effects, including the development of clinical tolerance, has been proposed. This review is focused on M6G and the factors that contribute to its clinical utility. The formation and distribution of M6G are presented, as are the analgesic effect and the onset of this effect. The impact of genetics, age, and gender on M6G and its effects is also reviewed.

Opioid metabolites

The metabolism of opioids closely relates to their chemical structure. Opioids are subject to O-dealkylation, N-dealkylation, ketoreduction, or deacetylation leading to phase-I metabolites. By glucuronidation or sulfatation, phase-II metabolites are formed. Some metabolites of opioids have an activity themselves and contribute to the effects of the parent compound. This can go as far that the main clinical activity is exerted through active metabolites while the parent compounds are only weak agonist at mu-opioid receptors, as in the case of codeine and tilidine. The clinical effects of tramadol also involve an important contribution of its active metabolite. With morphine, the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide exerts important clinical opioid effects when it accumulates in the plasma of patients with renal failure. However, after short-term administration of morphine, its contribution to the central nervous effects of morphine is probably poor. Morphine-6-glucuronide has recently been identified to exert important peripheral opioid effects. By this, it may play an important role in the clinical effects of morphine. Several other opioids, such as meperidine and perhaps also morphine and hydromorphone, produce metabolites with neuroexcitatory effects. In sum, the evidence suggests that the metabolites of several opioids account for an important part of the clinical effects that must be considered in clinical practice.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: Actions and mechanisms

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) appears to show equivalent analgesia to morphine but to have a superior side-effect profile in terms of reduced liability to induce nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence behind this statement and to identify the possible reasons that may contribute to the profile of M6G. The vast majority of available data supports the notion that both M6G and morphine mediate their effects by activating the micro-opioid receptor. The differences for which there is a reasonable consensus in the literature can be summarized as: (1) Morphine has a slightly higher affinity for the micro-opioid receptor than M6G, (2) M6G shows a slightly higher efficacy at the micro-opioid receptor, (3) M6G has a lower affinity for the kappa-opioid receptor than morphine, and (4) M6G has a very different absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile from morphine. However, none of these are adequate alone to explain the clinical differences between M6G and morphine. The ADME differences are perhaps most likely to explain some of the differences but seem unlikely to be the whole story. Further work is required to examine further the profile of M6G, notably whether M6G penetrates differentially to areas of the brain involved in pain and those involved in nausea, vomiting, and respiratory control or whether micro-opioid receptors in these brain areas differ in either their regulation or pharmacology.

Morphine metabolites as novel analgesic drugs?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Morphine metabolites have attracted continuing interest for their contribution to the desired and unwanted effects of morphine. Among the metabolites of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide has been given most scientific attention. It accounts for 10% of the morphine metabolism, acts as an agonist at mu-opioid receptors and exerts antinociceptive effects. This review summarizes the recent findings on morphine-6-glucuronide and discusses its potential use as an analgesic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Morphine-6-glucuronide has a very long delay between the time course of its plasma concentrations and the time course of its central nervous effects, with 6-8 h probably the longest transfer half-life between plasma and effect site of all opioids administered in humans. This complicates the control of morphine-6-glucuronide therapy when used as an intravenous analgesic, and the long duration of action confers no advantage over other opioids because long-lasting opioid analgesia can be readily obtained with sustained release formulations of other opioids. During acute treatment, however, morphine-6-glucuronide appears to be sufficiently potent to exert peripheral analgesic effects, without exerting major central nervous opioid side effects for a short period of time. The side effects profile does not clearly separate morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine, with reports of similar side effects. There are contrasting reports, however, about similar or less respiratory depression and other side effects compared with morphine after systemic injection.

SUMMARY

Morphine-6-glucuronide might qualify as an analgesic but it has several pharmacological properties that make it far from ideal for therapeutic use. Whether it will be a useful addition to the currently established analgesics has yet to be demonstrated.

Comparison of sustained-release morphine with sustained-release oxycodone in advanced cancer patients

The antinociceptive effect of morphine and oxycodone is mediated preferentially at μ and κ receptors, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic profile of the combination of morphine and oxycodone in cancer pain, compared to the standard administration of morphine alone. Controlled-release formulations of oxycodone (CRO) and morphine (CRM) were compared in 26 patients. The study started with an open-label, randomised titration phase to achieve stable pain control for 7 days, followed by a double-blind, randomised crossover phase in two periods, 14 days each. At any point, patients were allowed to use oral immediate-release morphine (IRM) as needed, in order to keep visual analogue scale ⩽4. Pain, satisfaction, adverse effects and number of daily rescue morphine tablets were assessed. A total of 22 patients were evaluated. The weekly upload consumption ratio in morphine/oxycodone was 1 : 1.8 (1.80, 1.83, 1.76, 1.84). The weekly IRM consumption was higher in patients having CRM compared to patients having CRO (ratio morphine/oxycodone: 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.7) (P<0.05). Patients receiving oxycodone complained of less nausea and vomiting. The rescue morphine analgesic consumption was 38% higher in patients receiving only morphine, compared to patients receiving both morphine and oxycodone. The results suggest that the combination of morphine/oxycodone (opioids with differential preferential sites of action) can be a useful alternative to morphine alone, resulting in a better analgesia profile and less emesis.

β-Phenylethylamines and the isoquinoline alkaloids

This review covers beta-phenylethylamines and isoquinoline alkaloids derived from them, including further products of oxidation. condensation with formaldehyde and rearrangement, some of which do not contain an isoquinoline system, together with naphthylisoquinoline alkaloids, which have a different biogenetic origin. The occurrence of the alkaloids, with the structures of new bases, together with their reactions, syntheses and biological activities are reported. The literature from July 2002 to June 2003 is reviewed, with 568 references cited.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2002

This paper is the twenty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2002 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).