A comparison of bispectral index and ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index in measuring the clinical interaction between ketamine and propofol anaesthesia

Effects of S-ketamine on Postoperative Recovery Quality and Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

INTRODUCTION

S-ketamine plays an important role in reducing postoperative pain, but its impact on the quality of recovery in breast cancer has not been clarified. We designed this trial to explore the effects of s-ketamine on the quality of postoperative recovery and inflammatory response in modified radical mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients were randomly assigned to group C (group control), group K1 (group of s-ketamine dose 1) and group K2 (group of s-ketamine dose 2). Groups K1 and K2 were given 0.1 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg s-ketamine intravenous (IV) after induction, followed by 0.1 mg/kg/h or 0.2 mg/kg/h continuous intravenous infusion, respectively. Group C received the same volume of saline. A 40-item Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) was used to assess the quality of recovery at 24 h postoperatively. Changes in inflammatory markers, nociceptive thresholds, and the occurrence of adverse events were recorded at 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

The QoR-40 scores at 24 h postoperatively were higher in group K2 [182.00 (179.00-185.00)] compared to group K1 [174.00 (169.50-180.50)] and group C [169.00 (163.75-174.25)] (group K2 vs. group K1, P < 0.001; group K2 vs. group C, P < 0.001). At 24 h postoperatively, the neutrophil count, NLR (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio), and CRP (C-creative protein) were all significantly lower in group K2 than group C(P < 0.05), no differences were observed between group K1 and C(P > 0.05), group K1 and K2(P > 0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects among the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A high dose of s-ketamine improved the quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery, as well as alleviated the inflammatory response without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Effects of intra-operative administration of subanesthetic s-ketamine on emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Ketamine is administered in the perioperative period for its benefits in analgesia, anti-agitation and anti-depression when administered at a small dose. However, it is not clear whether the intra-operative administration of ketamine would affect emergence under sevoflurane anesthesia. To investigate this effect, we designed this trial.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we enrolled 44 female patients aged 18-60 who were scheduled to elective laparoscopic gynecological surgeries. All patients were randomly assigned to saline or s-ketamine group. In s-ketamine group, patients received 0.125 mg/kg s-ketamine 30 min after the start of surgery. In saline group, patients were administered the same volume of saline. Sevoflurane and remifentanil were used to maintain general anesthesia. The primary outcome was emergence time. We also assessed postoperative agitation, cognitive function, and delirium. In addition, we collected and analyzed prefrontal electroencephalogram (EEG) during and after general anesthesia.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in emergence time between s-ketamine group and saline group (10.80 ± 3.77 min vs. 10.00 ± 2.78 min, P = 0.457). Neither postoperative agitation (4 [3, 4] vs. 4 [3, 4], P = 0.835) nor cognitive function (25.84 ± 2.69 vs. 25.55 ± 2.19, P = 0.412) differed between groups. No postoperative delirium was observed in either group. Subanesthetic s-ketamine resulted in active EEG with decreased power of slow (-0.35 ± 1.13 dB vs. -1.63 ± 1.03 dB, P = 0.003), delta (-0.22 ± 1.11 dB vs. -1.32 ± 1.09 dB, P = 0.011) and alpha (-0.31 ± 0.71 dB vs. -1.71 ± 1.34 dB, P = 0.0003) waves and increased power of beta-gamma bands (-0.30 ± 0.89 dB vs. 4.20 ± 2.08 dB, P < 0.0001) during sevoflurane anesthesia, as well as an increased alpha peak frequency (-0.16 ± 0.48 Hz vs. 0.31 ± 0.73 Hz, P = 0.026). EEG patterns did not differ during the recovery period after emergence between groups.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine administered during sevoflurane anesthesia had no apparent influence on emergence time in young and middle-aged female patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Subanesthetic s-ketamine induced an active prefrontal EEG pattern during sevoflurane anesthesia but did not raise neurological side effects after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100046479 (date: 16/05/2021).

Effective anesthetic management with remimazolam and ketamine without muscle relaxants for parotidectomy in a patient with myotonic dystrophy: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM) are highly sensitive to anesthetics, muscle relaxants, and opioids, necessitating appropriate anesthetic management. Recently, remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has been approved for use as a general anesthetic in Japan, and patients with DM have reportedly been treated with remimazolam. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has reported on endotracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants under anesthetic management with remimazolam, nor on the combination of remimazolam and ketamine.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 23-year-old man was referred to our hospital for right parotidectomy and diagnosed with DM just before surgery. At the surgeon's discretion, he was scheduled to undergo nerve monitoring to preserve the facial nerve.

DIAGNOSIS

Myotonic dystrophy.

INTERVENTIONS

We planned total intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxants and selected remimazolam for anesthesia. Our aim was to prevent the intraoperative or postoperative complications associated with propofol and inhalational anesthetics. Additionally, we selected multimodal analgesia, including ketamine, to avoid opioid use. General anesthesia was induced with ketamine 30 mg, remifentanil 0.72 μg/kg/min, and remimazolam 12 + 6 mg. Endotracheal intubation was performed under videolaryngoscopy without the use of muscle relaxants. For postoperative analgesia, we administered additional doses of ketamine 20 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg, and the surgeons infiltrated 8 mL of xylocaine 0.5% with epinephrine into the skin incision before starting the surgery. Intraoperative anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam 0.9 to 1.0 mg/kg/h and remifentanil 0.26 to 0.50 μg/kg/min. Flumazenil was administered for rapid awakening and safe extubation. All vitals, including the bispectral index, were stable during surgery.

OUTCOMES

The patient did not develop facial nerve paralysis, sore throat, or hoarseness, nor did he have any memory of the surgery. Good postoperative analgesia was achieved.

LESSONS

We achieved effective anesthetic management using remimazolam without muscle relaxants in a patient with DM. Furthermore, the combination of remimazolam and ketamine provided good sedation and postoperative analgesia.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Ketofol versus Combination of Ketofol and Lidocaine for Short-Term Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients; Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Effects on Recovery

Background: Ketofol admixture has been proposed to be useful for sedation and general anesthesia. The beneficial effect of the combination of ketofol with lidocaine may be a shortened time of anesthesia and recovery period. This study aimed to establish the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with ketofol and ketofol with lidocaine on recovery in children. Methods: Two hundred children from the ages of 1–12 years who underwent short surgical procedures were randomly allocated into two groups. Propofol mixtures (ketofol) were prepared for group l. A ratio of 1:4 of ketofol was used for induction and for the maintenance of anesthesia a ratio of was used 1:7. For the induction and maintenance of anesthesia ketofol with lidocaine (lidoketofol) was used in group II. The McFarlan infusion regimen was used with reduction. The extubating time, anesthesia duration and the length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded. Results: Extubation time showed to be considerably shorter in the lidoketofol group than in the ketofol group (120 s versus 240 s; p < 0.00001). The anesthesia duration was also significantly shorter in the lidoketofol group (35 min vs. 50 min; p < 0.00001). The lidoketofol group showed to have a lower length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ketofol group (20 min vs. 35 min; p < 0.00001). The lidoketofol group showed lower fentanyl consumption per kg (2.1 µg per kg vs. 2.3 µg per kg; p < 0.056) and lower propofol consumption (6.6 mg per kg vs. 7.6 mg per kg; p < 0.032). Conclusion: The recovery in pediatric anesthesia can improve with usage of TIVA with ketofol plus lidocaine admixture with a reduced McFarlan dose regimen.

Electroencephalogram variability analysis for monitoring depth of anesthesia

Objective. In this paper, a new approach of extracting and measuring the variability in electroencephalogram (EEG) was proposed to assess the depth of anesthesia (DOA) under general anesthesia.Approach. The EEG variability (EEGV) was extracted as a fluctuation in time interval that occurs between two local maxima of EEG. Eight parameters related to EEGV were measured in time and frequency domains, and compared with state-of-the-art DOA estimation parameters, including sample entropy, permutation entropy, median frequency and spectral edge frequency of EEG. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to validate its performance on 56 patients.Main results. Our proposed EEGV-derived parameters yield significant difference for discriminating between awake and anesthesia stages at a significance level of 0.05, as well as improvement in AUC and correlation coefficient on average, which surpasses the conventional features of EEG in detection accuracy of unconscious state and tracking the level of consciousness.Significance. To sum up, EEGV analysis provides a new perspective in quantifying EEG and corresponding parameters are powerful and promising for monitoring DOA under clinical situations.

The impact of bolus versus continuous infusion of intravenous ketamine on bispectral index variations and desflurane administration during major surgery: The KETABIS study

BACKGROUND

Although ketamine, a NMDA-receptor antagonist, tends to increase the bispectral index (BIS), it remains a widely used analgesic whenever administered in low doses during major surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the impact of intravenous ketamine (given either as a continuous infusion or as a bolus) on BIS and to compare desflurane administration and postoperative outcomes between the groups.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study.

SETTING

University hospital, operating room.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients, scheduled for major abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Patients were randomised into two groups: ketamine by intravenous continuous infusion - group (KI) and ketamine by i.v. bolus - group (KB). In the KI group, ketamine at a rate of 0.25 mg kg-1 h-1 was commenced at skin incision (T0) and maintained at this rate for the duration of surgery. In group KB, a ketamine bolus of 0.25 mg kg-1was administered at T0 and repeated every hour. The difference in BIS between the groups was compared from T0 onwards. The amount of desflurane administered to keep BIS within the usual recommended range (40-60) was compared, as were the doses of phenylephrine and remifentanil. Postoperative pain and recovery outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

After T0, the BIS increased significantly from baseline in group KB compared with group KI: the rise in BIS was 20 ± 8 vs. 11 ± 6, respectively (P = 0.0001). The between-group mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI), was 9 (5 to 13). In group KB, desflurane administration significantly increased for the first 15 min after T0: 6.3 ± 1.8 vs. 3.8 ± 1.3 ml (P < 0.0001) with a mean intergroup group difference (95% CI) of 2.4 (1.5 to 3.4) ml. There was no difference in desflurane administration when considering the full hour from T0 to T60 min: 16 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 5 ml (P = 0.63) with a mean intergroup difference (95% CI) of 1 (-3 to 5) ml. After surgery, pain scores, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea and vomiting and recovery scores were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with a continuous ketamine infusion, a ketamine bolus significantly increased the BIS after T0. In order to keep the BIS below 60, significantly more desflurane was administered from T0 to T15 min in group KB. To prevent such higher desflurane administration and its related atmospheric pollution, our results suggest administering intra-operative intravenous ketamine as an infusion rather than a bolus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov registration identifier: NCT03781635.

Effects on Recovery of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol versus Ketofol for Short-Lasting Laparoscopic Procedures

BACKGROUND

Combining ketamine and propofol (ketofol) was suggested as a new concept for sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric populations for various conditions. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and ketofol on recovery after laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Two hundred children with median age of 5 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery were randomized into two groups. Propofol 1% was used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in group I, while ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) was used in group II. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) was prepared in the same applicator for group II. Ketofol ratios of 1:4 and 1:7 were used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, respectively. A reduced McFarlan infusion dose was used in group I (1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 mL/kg/h for 15, 15, and 30 min, respectively), while a McFarlan infusion dose was used in group II (1.5, 1.3, and 1.1 mL/kg/h for 15, 15, and 30 min, respectively). Extubating time, duration of anesthesia, and length of stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded.

RESULTS

Extubating time was significantly lower in the ketofol group than in the propofol group (240 s vs. 530 s; p < 0.00001). Significantly shorter duration of anesthesia (47 min vs. 60 min; p < 0.00001) as well as length of stay in the PACU (35 min vs. 100 min; p < 0.00001) were recorded in ketofol compared to the propofol group. Total fentanyl (100 µg (interquartile range, IQR 80, 125) vs. 50 µg (IQR 40, 60); p < 0.00001) and propofol (260 mg (IQR 200, 350) vs. 160 mg (IQR 120, 210); p < 0.00001) consumption per body weight were significantly lower in the ketofol group.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA with ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) using a reduced McFarlan dose regimen shortened extubating time, duration of anesthesia, as well as length of stay in the PACU in pediatric anesthesia after laparoscopic surgery.

Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine

Comparison of two depth of anesthesia indices, qCON (Conox) and PSI (Sedline), during desflurane sedation and their sensitivity to random ketamine boluses in patients undergoing routine surgery. The performance of desflurane and ketamine on both indices was analyzed for 11 patients, and the ketamine sensitivity was compared with another group of 11 patients under sevoflurane and propofol.The MOAA/S was used to determine sedation level and pain. Different boluses of ketamine ranging from 10 to 30 mg where randomly administered in both groups and the effect on the indexes were measured after 4 min.The indices were recorded during the whole surgery, and their correlations with the desflurane concentration and the discrimination between awake and anesthetized states were evaluated with the prediction probability statistic (Pk). The Pk values, mean (se), discriminating between awake and anesthetized states were 0.974(0.016) for the qCON and 0.962(0.0123) for the PSI, while the 1-Pk statistic for the qCON and the PSI with respect to the desflurane concentration were 0.927(0.016) and 0.918(0.018), respectively, with no statistically significant differences.The agreement between both depth of hypnosis parameters was assessed under the Bland-Altman plot and the Spearman correlation, r_s = 0.57(p < 0.001).During the sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia, which served as a control group, both indices experienced a similar behavior with a no significant change of their median values after ketamine. However, during desflurane anesthesia the qCON index did not change significantly after ketamine administration, qCON (before = 33 (4), after = 30 (17); Wilcoxon, p = 0.89), while the PSI experienced a significant increase, PSI (before = 31(6), after = 39(16) Wilcoxon, p = 0.013).This study shows that qCON and PSI have similar performance under desflurane with good discrimination between the awake and anesthetized states. While both indices exhibited similar behavior under ketamine boluses under a sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia, the qCON index had a better performance under ketamine during desflurane anesthesia.

Electroencephalography and Brain Oxygenation Monitoring in the Perioperative Period

Maintaining brain function and integrity is a pivotal part of anesthesiological practice. The present overview aims to describe the current role of the 2 most frequently used monitoring methods for evaluation brain function in the perioperative period, ie, electroencephalography (EEG) and brain oxygenation monitoring. Available evidence suggests that EEG-derived parameters give additional information about depth of anesthesia for optimizing anesthetic titration. The effects on reduction of drug consumption or recovery time are heterogeneous, but most studies show a reduction of recovery times if anesthesia is titrated along processed EEG. It has been hypothesized that future EEG-derived indices will allow a better understanding of the neurophysiological principles of anesthetic-induced alteration of consciousness instead of the probabilistic approach most often used nowadays.Brain oxygenation can be either measured directly in brain parenchyma via a surgical burr hole, estimated from the venous outflow of the brain via a catheter in the jugular bulb, or assessed noninvasively by near-infrared spectroscopy. The latter method has increasingly been accepted clinically due to its ease of use and increasing evidence that near-infrared spectroscopy-derived cerebral oxygen saturation levels are associated with neurological and/or general perioperative complications and increased mortality. Furthermore, a goal-directed strategy aiming to avoid cerebral desaturations might help to reduce these complications. Recent evidence points out that this technology may additionally be used to assess autoregulation of cerebral blood flow and thereby help to titrate arterial blood pressure to the individual needs and for bedside diagnosis of disturbed autoregulation.

Data Driven Investigation of Bispectral Index Algorithm

Bispectral index (BIS), a useful marker of anaesthetic depth, is calculated by a statistical multivariate model using nonlinear functions of electroencephalography-based subparameters. However, only a portion of the proprietary algorithm has been identified. We investigated the BIS algorithm using clinical big data and machine learning techniques. Retrospective data from 5,427 patients who underwent BIS monitoring during general anaesthesia were used, of which 80% and 20% were used as training datasets and test datasets, respectively. A histogram of data points was plotted to define five BIS ranges representing the depth of anaesthesia. Decision tree analysis was performed to determine the electroencephalography subparameters and their thresholds for classifying five BIS ranges. Random sample consensus regression analyses were performed using the subparameters to derive multiple linear regression models of BIS calculation in five BIS ranges. The performance of the decision tree and regression models was externally validated with positive predictive value and median absolute error, respectively. A four-level depth decision tree was built with four subparameters such as burst suppression ratio, power of electromyogram, 95% spectral edge frequency, and relative beta ratio. Positive predictive values were 100%, 80%, 80%, 85% and 89% in the order of increasing BIS in the five BIS ranges. The average of median absolute errors of regression models was 4.1 as BIS value. A data driven BIS calculation algorithm using multiple electroencephalography subparameters with different weights depending on BIS ranges has been proposed. The results may help the anaesthesiologists interpret the erroneous BIS values observed during clinical practice.

Thinking outside the box. Off-label use of Bispectral Index within context and limitations for conditions other than depth of anesthesia

Numerous articles appeared in literature using brain function monitors (BFM), such as Bispectral Index (BIS) to assess cerebral cognitive conditions not related to depth of anesthesia. BIS cannot be considered a "true" reflection of the electroencephalography (EEG) signal nor an independent measure of brain function. BIS algorithm was retrospectively derived from EEG changes with incremental doses of γ-amino butyric acid (GABA)ergic anesthetic agents while measuring 3 descriptors. In many instances we are confronted with BIS values that do not concur with clinically judged anesthetic state arising from an underlying alteration of the patients' own EEG. Because BIS is an EEG derived parameter; conditions that can "alter" the raw EEG signal would subsequently change BIS to reflect other unrelated EEG events of patient-dependent pathophysiologic perturbations. Could we use BIS monitor outside the scope of the operating room to "grade" other EEG conditions? Actually the answer to that seems to be a "very cautious" yes. Because BIS is a rather appealing scale from 100 to 0, it is tempting to find numerical cut-off values for conditions that are already clinically graded like West Haven hepatic encephalopathy. Having said that I strongly argue against going as far as using BIS in Critical Care Unit (CCU) setting, there are too much heterogeneity and many disease states in the CCU patients, other than sedatives /hypnotics, that would strongly influence BIS values, in effect rendering BIS not only useless most of the time but can also be misleading.

Different effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on electroencephalogram patterns: Wakefulness, moderate sedation, deep sedation and recovery

Sedation induces changes in electroencephalography (EEG) dynamics. However, the distinct EEG dynamic characteristics at comparable sedation levels have not been well studied, resulting in potential interpretation errors in EEG monitoring during sedation. We aimed to analyze the EEG dynamics of dexmedetomidine and propofol at comparable sedation levels and to explore EEG changes with increased sedation levels for each agent. We measured the Bispectral Index (BIS) and 20-channel EEG under dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation from wakefulness, moderate sedation, and deep sedation to recovery in healthy volunteers (n = 10) in a randomized, 2-day, crossover study. Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score was used to assess sedation levels. Despite similar changes in increased delta oscillations, multiple differences in the EEG spatiotemporal dynamics were observed between these two agents. During moderate sedation, both dexmedetomidine and propofol induced increased spindle power; however, dexmedetomidine decreased the global alpha/beta/gamma power, whereas propofol decreased the alpha power in the occipital area and increased the global spindle/beta/gamma power. During deep sedation, dexmedetomidine was associated with increased fronto-central spindle power and decreased global alpha/beta/gamma power, but propofol was associated with increased theta/alpha/spindle/beta power, which was maximized in the frontal area. The transition of topographic alpha/spindle/beta power distribution from moderate sedation to deep sedation completely differed between these two agents. Our study demonstrated that there was a distinct hierarchy of EEG changes with increased sedation depths by propofol and dexmedetomidine. Differences in EEG dynamics at the same sedation level might account for differences in the BIS value and reflect the different sedation mechanisms. EEG-based clinical sedation monitoring should consider the effect of drug types on EEG dynamics.

Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain

Although significant advances in clinical monitoring technology and clinical practice development have taken place in the last several decades, in this editorial we argue that much more still needs to be done. We begin by identifying many of the improvements in perioperative technology that have become available in recent years; these include electroencephalographic depth of anesthesia monitoring, bedside ultrasonography, advanced neuromuscular transmission monitoring systems, and other developments. We then discuss some of the perioperative technical challenges that remain to be satisfactorily addressed, such as products that incorporate poor software design or offer a confusing user interface. Finally we suggest that the journal support initiatives to help remedy this problem by publishing reports on the evaluation of medical equipment as a means to restore the link between clinical research and clinical end-users.

Applied Neuromonitoring in Cardiac Surgery: Patient Specific Management

Various studies have demonstrated that over 50% of patients presenting for coronary revascularization surgery have evidence of extracranial or intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Although evidence is compelling that cerebral emboli are a major cause of perioperative central nervous system (CNS) morbidity in such patients, it is also apparent that alterations in cerebral perfusion pressure and blood flow can profoundly influence the extent of injury after an embolic insult. In this context, the recent studies demonstrating improved CNS outcomes with applied neuromonitoring in cardiac surgical patients can be understood as reflecting the optimization of CNS perfusion characteristics with potential amelioration of microembolic injury. This review critically evaluates and discusses the relevant characteristics of applied neuromonitoring techniques, including bispectral index (BIS), transcranial Doppler (TCD), and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) in the context of patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. Recent outcomes data regarding CNS and related morbidity and the influence of neuromonitoring in these groups are evaluated.

Falsely increased bispectral index values by convective air warming system during kidney transplantation

Bispectral index (BIS) is a reliable parameter for measuring depth of hypnotic level during anesthesia. Convective air warming system is an effective equipment to maintain normothermia during operation. We report falsely elevated BIS value due to convective air warming system while undergoing kidney transplantation.

The relationship between the Bispectral Index (BIS) and the Observer Alertness of Sedation Scale (OASS) scores during propofol sedation with and without ketamine: a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial

Prior studies have examined the static effect of intravenous ketamine on the BIS Index for sedation but it remains unknown if the BIS Index is a reliable method to track sedation levels in the presence of ketamine. The major objective of the current investigation was to compare the BIS Vista Index ability to track varying depths of sedation as determined by OASS scores in a standardized anesthetic regimen with and without ketamine. The study was a randomized, double blinded clinical trial. Patients undergoing breast surgery under sedation with propofol were randomized to receive ketamine (1.5 μg kg min(-1)) or saline. Infusion data was used to estimate propofol plasma concentrations (Cp). The main outcome of interest was the correlation between the BIS Vista Index with the OASS score. Twenty subjects were recruited and fifteen completed the study. Four hundred fifty-five paired data points were included in the analysis. Model performance (Nagelkerke R(2)) of the multinomial logistic regression model was 0.57 with the c-statistic of 0.87 (95 % CI 0.82-0.91). Compared to awake the odds ratio for BIS values predicting moderate sedation in the saline/propofol group 1.19 (95 % CI 1.12-1.25) but only 1.06 (95 % CI 1.02-1.1) in the ketamine/propofol group (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the odds for BIS values to predict deep sedation between groups (P = 0.14). The BIS monitor can be used to monitor sedation level even when ketamine is used with propofol as part of the sedation regimen. However, ketamine reduces the value of the BIS in predicting moderate sedation levels.

Effects of Ketamine-Propofol Mixture on Intraocular Pressure and Haemodynamics in Elderly Patients: A Randomised Double-Blind Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamics in elderly patients during anaesthetic management at each repeated measurement times.

METHODS

Forty elderly ASA I and II patients were divided into two random groups and received either propofol (1.5 mg kg(-1); group P, n=20) or ketofol (1:1 single syringe mixture of 5 mg mL(-1) ketamine and 5 mg mL(-1) propofol; group KP, n=20). A proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) was inserted 60 seconds after induction of anaesthesia. IOP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) values were recorded at preinduction (t0), immediately following induction (t1), and at 1 (t2), 3 (t3), and 5 (t4) minutes after induction. Haemodynamic complications and the need for ephedrine were also recorded.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics at the beginning of the procedure were similar between the groups. SBP and HR were significantly increased in group KP compared to group P at t1 and t4 (p=0.044). Induction of both anaesthetic agents significantly decreased the IOP values from the t0 (p=0.026). A significant decrease in IOP was found at t1 and t4 in group P compared to group KP (p=0.018). The total dose of ephedrine was statistically different in group P (p=0.034).

CONCLUSION

Ketofol can be an alternative agent to provide haemodynamic stability with a moderate decrease in IOP during anaesthesia induction in elderly patients.

Evolution of electroencephalogram signal analysis techniques during anesthesia

Biosignal analysis is one of the most important topics that researchers have tried to develop during the last century to understand numerous human diseases. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) are one of the techniques which provides an electrical representation of biosignals that reflect changes in the activity of the human brain. Monitoring the levels of anesthesia is a very important subject, which has been proposed to avoid both patient awareness caused by inadequate dosage of anesthetic drugs and excessive use of anesthesia during surgery. This article reviews the bases of these techniques and their development within the last decades and provides a synopsis of the relevant methodologies and algorithms that are used to analyze EEG signals. In addition, it aims to present some of the physiological background of the EEG signal, developments in EEG signal processing, and the effective methods used to remove various types of noise. This review will hopefully increase efforts to develop methods that use EEG signals for determining and classifying the depth of anesthesia with a high data rate to produce a flexible and reliable detection device.

SNAP II index: an alternative to the COMFORT scale in assessing the level of sedation in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients

Sedation monitoring is essential in pediatric patients on ventilatory support to achieve comfort and safety. The COMFORT scale was designed and validated to assess the level of sedation in intubated pediatric patients. However, it remains unreliable in pharmacologically paralyzed patients. The SNAP II index is calculated using an algorithm that incorporates high-frequency (80-420 Hz) electroencephalogram (EEG) components, known to be useful in discriminating between awake and unconscious states, unlike other measurements that only include low-frequency EEG segments such as the bispectral index score. Previous studies suggested that the SNAP II index is a reliable and sensitive indicator of the level of consciousness in adult patients. Despite its potential, no data are currently available in the pediatric critically ill population on ventilatory support. This is the first pilot study assessing the potential application of the SNAP II index in critically ill pediatric patients by comparing it to the commonly used COMFORT scale.

Comparison of effects of propofol and ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol on ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients.

METHODS

Eighty elderly patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, were randomly divided into two groups to receive either propofol 0.15 ml/kg (n = 40), or ketofol (using a 1:1 single-syringe mixture of 5 mg/ml ketamine and 5 mg/ml propofol) (n = 40) before induction of anesthesia. Sixty seconds after induction, the PLMA was inserted. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure (systolic [S] BP) were recorded prior to the induction of anesthesia, immediately following induction, immediately after PLMA insertion, and 5 and 10 min after PLMA insertion. PLMA insertion conditions were scored according to mouth opening, swallowing, coughing, head and body motion, laryngospasm, and ease of PLMA insertion by the same experienced anesthesiologist, who did not know which agents were used.

RESULTS

There were no differences in PLMA insertion conditions between the groups. The number of patients in need of ephedrine (P = 0.043) and the total dose of ephedrine (P = 0.022) were significantly lower, and apnea duration (P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the ketofol group compared with the propofol group. SBP was significantly higher in the ketofol group than in the propofol group immediately after PLMA insertion and 5 min after PLMA insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

The same PLMA insertion conditions were found with ketofol and propofol. The number of patients in need of ephedrine and the total ephedrine dose were lower and apnea duration was increased in the ketofol group.

Perioperative effects of various anesthetic adjuvants with TIVA guided by bispectral index

Background

This prospective, randomized, double blinded, controlled study was designed to compare effects of intravenous co-administration of clonidine, magnesium, or ketamine on anesthetic consumption, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative analgesia and recovery indices during Bispectral Index (BIS) guided total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).

Methods

After ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 120 adult patients ASA I and II scheduled for open cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to one of 4 equal groups. Group CL received clonidine 3 µg/kg and maintained by 2 µg/kg/h. Group MG received magnesium sulphate 50 mg/kg and maintained by 8 mg/kg/h. Group KET received racemic ketamine 0.4 mg/kg and maintained by 0.2 mg/kg/h. Control group (CT) received the same volume of isotonic saline. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium. Propofol infusion was adjusted to keep the BIS value between 45-55. Intraoperative hemodynamics, induction time, anesthetic consumption, recovery indices, and PACU discharge were recorded.

Results

Induction time, propofol requirements for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, intraoperative fentanyl and hemodynamic values were significantly lower with Groups CL and MG compared to Groups KET and CT (P < 0.05). Patients in Group MG showed significantly lower muscle relaxant consumption, delayed recovery and PACU discharge than other groups (P < 0.05). First, analgesic requirement was significantly longer and total postoperative analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the adjuvant groups versus Group CT (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Clonidine, magnesium, and ketamine can be useful adjuvant agents to BIS-guided TIVA. Pharmacokinetic studies of such drug combinations were recommended to investigate their interaction.

Limitations of anaesthesia depth monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We critically review brain function monitors based on the processed electroencephalogram with regards to signal quality, artefacts and other limitations in clinical performance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have been showing that depth of anaesthesia monitors based on processed electroencephalogram has limitations that can lead to a wrong interpretation of the level of anaesthesia. Processed electroencephalogram indices can be altered by nonanaesthetic influences ranging from artefacts that affect signal quality and signal processing, adverse effects of some anaesthetic and nonanaesthetic drugs, neuromuscular blocking agents to conditions inherent to the patient such as cerebral tumours, brain ischemia and temperature.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should be aware of the several limitations of the commercial devices intending to monitor the depth of anaesthesia, which may not reflect the real underlying level of unconsciousness.

An intraoperative small dose of ketamine prevents remifentanil-induced postanesthetic shivering

Patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg/kg ketamine at induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion of 0.3 mg/kg/h until the end of surgery (ketamine group, n = 32), or an equivalent volume of normal saline (control group, n = 32). Anesthesia was maintained with IV propofol, a fixed infusion rate of remifentanil (0.25 μg/kg/min), and epidural ropivacaine. Postanesthetic shivering (PAS) was evaluated for 30 minutes after emergence. Intraoperative temperatures were similar between the 2 groups. The incidence of PAS was less frequent in the ketamine group (n = 2, 6%) compared with the control group (n = 12, 38%, P = 0.005). We conclude that, during the early recovery phase, intraoperative ketamine reduces remifentanil-induced PAS.

Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia

One of the current challenges in medicine is monitoring the patients’ depth of general anaesthesia (DGA). Accurate assessment of the depth of anaesthesia contributes to tailoring drug administration to the individual patient, thus preventing awareness or excessive anaesthetic depth and improving patients’ outcomes. In the past decade, there has been a significant increase in the number of studies on the development, comparison and validation of commercial devices that estimate the DGA by analyzing electrical activity of the brain (i.e., evoked potentials or brain waves). In this paper we review the most frequently used sensors and mathematical methods for monitoring the DGA, their validation in clinical practice and discuss the central question of whether these approaches can, compared to other conventional methods, reduce the risk of patient awareness during surgical procedures.

Effects of perioperative S (+) ketamine infusion added to multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing ambulatory haemorrhoidectomy

Background and objective

Perioperative low-dose ketamine has been useful for postoperative analgesia. In this study we wanted to assess the analgesic effect and possible side-effects of perioperative low-dose S (+) ketamine when added to a regime of non-opioid multimodal pain prophylaxis.

Methods

Seventy-seven patients scheduled for haemorrhoidectomy were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, controlled study. They received oral paracetamol 1–2 g, total intravenous anaesthesia, intravenous 8 mg dexamethasone, 30 mg ketorolac and local infiltration with bupivacaine/epinephrine. Patients randomized to S (+) ketamine received an intravenous bolus dose of 0.35 mg kg−1 S (+) ketamine before start of surgery followed by continuous infusion of 5 μg kg−1 min−1 until 2 min after end of surgery. Patients in the placebo group got isotonic saline (bolus and infusion). BISTM monitoring was used. Pain intensity and side-effects were assessed by blinded nursing staff during PACU stay and by phone 1, 7 and 90 days after surgery.

Results

In patients randomized to S (+) ketamine emergence from anaesthesia was significantly longer (13.1 min vs. 9.3 min; p < 0.001). BIS values were significantly higher during anaesthesia (maximal value during surgery: 62 vs. 57; p = 0.01) and when opening eyes (81 vs. 70, p < 0.001). Pain scores (NRS and VAS) did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

The addition of perioperative S (+) ketamine for postoperative analgesia after haemorrhoidectomy on top of multimodal non-opioid pain prophylaxis does not seem to be warranted, due to delayed emergence and recovery, more side-effects, altered BIS readings and absence of additive analgesic effect.

When the bispectral index (bis) can give false results

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The bispectral index (BIS) is a multifactorial parameter derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG), which allows monitoring of the hypnotic component of anesthesia. It was obtained from the algorithm based on the analysis of a large number of EEGs from volunteers and patients undergoing sedation and general anesthesia with different anesthetic agents. The use of BIS to monitor the depth of anesthesia reduces the incidence of intraoperative awakening and recall, among other benefits. The objective of this review was to present clinical situations in which the BIS gives false results, either elevated or decreased, due to conditions related to the patient or anesthetic actions unforeseen when the algorithm was elaborated.

CONTENTS

The bispectral index can be altered and influenced in different clinical situations in which abnormal EEG patterns are present; the effects of different anesthetics and other drugs not included when the algorithm was elaborated; interference from electrical equipment; as well as peculiarities of the monitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the BIS algorithm underwent several changes since its first version, the anesthesiologist should be aware of situations that cause false BIS readings to avoid complications, may it be secondary to anesthetic overdose or underdosing, which might cause intraoperative awakening and recall.

Ketamine has no effect on bispectral index during stable propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Ketamine 0.15-1 mg kg(-1) decreases postoperative morphine consumption, but 0.5 mg kg(-1) is associated with an increase in the bispectral index (BIS) values that can lead to an overdose of hypnotic agents. The purpose of our investigation was to study the effect of ketamine 0.2 mg kg(-1) administered over a 5 min period on the BIS during stable target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol-remifentanil general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Thirty ASA I or II patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery were included in this double-blind, randomized study. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with a TCI of propofol and remifentanil. After 5 min of steady-state anaesthesia (BIS at 40) without surgical stimulation, patients received either an infusion of ketamine 0.2 mg kg(-1) or normal saline. The test drug was infused over 5 min. Standard parameters and BIS values were recorded every minute until 15 min post-infusion.

RESULTS

The baseline mean (sd) value for the BIS was 37 (6.5) for the ketamine group and 39 (8.2) for the placebo group. The highest mean BIS value during the recording period was 41.5 (8.7) for the ketamine group and 40.1 (8.9) for the placebo group. BIS values were not statistically different between the groups (P=0.62); there was no significant change over time (P=0.65) with no group-time interaction (P=0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Under stable propofol and remifentanil TCI anaesthesia, a slow bolus infusion of ketamine 0.2 mg kg(-1) administered over a 5 min period did not increase the BIS value over the next 15 min.

Ketamine anesthesia in children--exploring infusion regimens

AIM

We aimed to produce a racemic ketamine manual infusion regimen capable of maintaining a steady-state blood concentration associated with anesthesia in children aged 1.5-12 years.

METHOD

The literature was searched for a ketamine blood concentration associated with anesthesia in humans. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were taken from published studies of infusion data in children and used in a pharmacokinetic simulation program to predict likely ketamine blood concentrations during infusions. A variability of 10% was allowed about the chosen target concentration.

RESULTS

A target concentration of 3 mg.l(-1) was chosen for simulation modeling. This target is greater than that associated with anesthesia when supplemented by nitrous oxide or midazolam in adults. Arousal to light touch or voice appears to occur at a mean plasma concentration of 0.5 mg.l(-1) in both children and adults. A loading dose of 2 mg.kg(-1) followed by an infusion rate of 11 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) for the first 20 min, 7 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) from 20 to 40 min, 5 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) from 40 to 60 min and 4 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) from 1 to 2 h resulted in a steady-state target concentration of 3 mg.l(-1) in children 1.5-12 years. Arousal, either spontaneous or to speech, is anticipated 3 h 47 min after a 2 h infusion in an average 6-year-old child. The context sensitive half-time in children was shorter than in adults after 1.5 h, rising from 30 min at 1 h to 55 min at 5 h after an infusion of 3 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) in a 10 kg child.

CONCLUSION

Children require higher infusion rates than adults to maintain steady-state concentrations of 3 mg.l(-1) and have shorter context sensitive half-times than adults after prolonged infusion. These differences can be attributed to age-related pharmacokinetics. We anticipate slow return to full consciousness after prolonged infusion, suggesting that a lower target concentration with supplementation from adjuvant short acting anesthetic drugs may be advantageous.

Effects of Fentanyl and S(+)-ketamine on Cerebral Hemodynamics, Gastrointestinal Motility, and Need of Vasopressors in Patients With Intracranial Pathologies

In neurosurgical patients, opioids are administered to prevent secondary cerebral damage. Complications often related to the administration of opioids are a decrease in blood pressure affording the use of vasopressors and intestinal atonia. One alternative approach to opioids is the application of S(+)-ketamine. However, owing to a suspected elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP), the administration of S(+)-ketamine has questioned for a long time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate ICP, gastrointestinal motility, and catecholamine consumption in neurosurgical patients undergoing 2 different protocols of anesthesia using fentanyl or S(+)-ketamine. Twenty-four patients sustaining traumatic brain injury or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage received methohexitone plus either fentanyl or S(+)-ketamine to establish a comparable level of sedation. To reach an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), the norepinephrine dosage was adapted successively. Enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal stimulation were started directly after admission on the critical care unit. ICP, CPP, and norepinephrine dosage were recorded over 5 days and also the time intervals to full enteral nutrition and first defecation. There was no difference regarding ICP, CPP, and the time period until full enteral nutrition or first defecation between both groups. Patients who underwent analgesia with S(+)-ketamine showed a trend to a lower demand of norepinephrine compared with the fentanyl group. Our results indicate that S(+)-ketamine does not increase ICP and that its use in neurosurgical patients should not be discouraged on the basis of ICP-related concerns.

Effect of age and sedative agent on the accuracy of bispectral index in detecting depth of sedation in children

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated age- and sedative agent-related differences in bispectral index across observed sedation levels in a large sample of children < 18 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

With institutional review board approval and waiver of consent, data from 4 independently conducted studies were combined in a secondary analysis of 3373 observations from 248 children aged 1 month to 18 years. In these studies, bispectral index values of sedated children were recorded in a blinded fashion, and sedation depth was scored using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Bispectral index was evaluated across UMSS scores for several age groups and during use of each sedative agent (with/without opioids).

RESULTS

There was a moderate inverse correlation between bispectral index and UMSS for all age groups. There were significant differences in bispectral index across UMSS and between each sedation level except UMSS 3 to 4 in all the age groups and UMSS 0 to 1 in infants. The mean bispectral index and the cutoff values on the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for mild, moderate, and deep sedation were significantly lower in infants < or = 6 months compared with older children at each sedation level. Bispectral index was reasonably sensitive and specific in differentiating mild (UMSS 0-1) from deeper (UMSS 3-4) levels of sedation but poorly differentiated between moderate and deep levels of sedation in all age groups. There was a moderate correlation between bispectral index and UMSS during the use of chloral hydrate, pentobarbital, propofol, and midazolam but poor correlation during ketamine or opioid use. Bispectral index values were significantly lower during deep sedation with propofol and pentobarbital compared with midazolam and chloral hydrate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that, although bispectral index may differentiate light from deep sedation in most children, bispectral index must be interpreted cautiously in sedated children, with particular consideration given to patient age and use of sedative agents.

Dexmedetomidine infusion as a supplement to isoflurane anaesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery

BACKGROUND

We explored the sympatholytic property of dexmedetomidine, especially its role in intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, haemodynamic stability, and attenuation of extubation response.

METHOD

In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee, 60 patients undergoing elective vitreoretinal surgery were allocated to two groups, receiving either placebo or dexmedetomidine. A loading dose of dexmedetomidine 2.5 microg kg(-1) h(-1) (or placebo in same volume) was infused for 10 min immediately before induction of anaesthesia with propofol, followed by a maintenance dexmedetomidine or placebo infusion at 0.4 microg kg(-1) h(-1) till 30 min before the end of the operation. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, oxygen, and air mixture. IOP was measured before the loading dose and 1 min after tracheal intubation. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) during loading, induction, maintenance, extubation, and recovery period were measured. The degree of strain on extubation was graded from 0 to 5.

RESULTS

The use of vasopressor/labetalol/atropine and the reduction in IOP were comparable between the two groups. There was a significant variation in MAP and HR over time within group, but not between groups. The median degree of strain was significantly lower (P = 0.049), and the time to reach Aldrete score of 10 shorter (P = 0.031) in the dexmedetomidine group.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine can be used without undue haemodynamic fluctuation and can decrease the excitatory response during extubation. The reduction in IOP with dexmedetomidine was comparable with placebo.

Spectral entropy assessment with auditory evoked potential in neuroanesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The assessment of the level of anesthesia is a very hard task, since no gold standard has stood out in the past three decades. Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (MLAEP) is one of the most popular neurophysiological tools for anesthesia monitoring. Recently, Spectral Entropy (SpEn) has been introduced: it provides two different parameters, State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE). The aim of this prospective study is to check SpEn end-point, comparing it to MLAEPs in neurosurgical anesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty patients submitted to elective supratentorial neurosurgery for removal of a temporal-parietal meningioma were included in the study. SpEn and MLAEPs were simultaneously monitored using the M-entropy module S/5 (GE Health Care, Helsinki, Finland) and Alaris Medical System AEP-ARX index monitor (AAI) (Kidemosevej, Denmark), respectively.

RESULTS

Four thousand and sixty four data points of SE, RE and AAI were recorded and ROC curves comparing AAI to RE and SE showed a highly significant (p<0.0001) area under the curve. The RE and SE cut-off values (showing maximal sensitivity with maximal specificity) to discriminate anesthesia from awake or consciousness sedation were 61 and 58, respectively. However, in a group of data points, low AAI was associated to high SpEn (577 data points for RE and 770 for SE) and vice versa (31 data points for RE and 43 for SE). The prediction probability for SE was 0.977 and for RE was 0.968.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SpEn is as effective as AAI.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results show that SpEn is able to discriminate between the levels of wakefulness and surgical anesthesia. However, the meaning of data showing a discrepancy between AAI and SpEn is not yet clear and calls for further study.

Performance of the Cerebral State Index During Increasing Levels of Propofol Anesthesia: A Comparison with the Bispectral Index

BACKGROUND

The cerebral state monitor is a new device to measure depth of anesthesia. In this study we compared the cerebral state monitor with the bispectral index (BIS) monitor during propofol anesthesia.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy patients received a continuous infusion of propofol (300 mL/h). The cerebral state index (CSI) and the BIS values were recorded until burst suppression ratio > or =60%. Baseline variability, prediction probability, and agreement analysis between indices were evaluated. Clinical markers of loss of consciousness were also assessed.

RESULTS

Mean awake BIS and CSI values were 95.6 and 91.6, respectively (P = 0.01). BIS and CSI prediction probability values (mean +/- sd) were estimated to be 0.87 +/- 0.08 and 0.86 +/- 0.08, respectively (NS). The CSI tended to stabilize at values of 60-40 when estimated propofol concentrations at the effect site increased from 5 to 8 mug/mL. The BIS stabilized at values of 40-20 when the propofol concentrations at the effect site increased from 7 to 10 mug/mL. The mean BIS-CSI difference was -7.4 with 95% limits of agreement of 22.2 and -36.9. The BIS and CSI correlation with the burst suppression ratio was -0.60 and -0.97, respectively (P < 0.01). Predicted BIS and CSI values for loss of eyelash reflex in 50% and 95% of the patients were different (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The overall performance of both monitors during propofol induction was similar. However, the different dynamic profiles of these monitors indicate that BIS may be a more useful index for evaluating intermediate anesthetic levels, whereas CSI may be better for evaluating deeper anesthetic levels.

Depth of Anesthesia Monitoring

Depth-of-anesthesia monitoring with EEG or EEG combined with mLAER is becoming widely used in anesthesia practice. Evidence shows that this monitoring improves outcome by reducing the incidence of intra-operative awareness while reducing the average amount of anesthesia that is administered, resulting in faster wake-up and recovery, and perhaps reduced nausea and vomiting. As with any monitoring device, there are limitations in the use of the monitors and the anesthesiologist must be able to interpret the data accordingly. The limitations include the following. The currently available monitoring algorithms do not account for all anesthetic drugs, including ketamine, nitrous oxide and halothane. EMG and other high-frequency electrical artifacts are common and interfere with EEG interpretation. Data processing time produces a lag in the computation of the depth-of-anesthesia monitoring index. Frequently the EEG effects of anesthetic drugs are not good predictors of movement in response to a surgical stimulus because the main site of action for anesthetic drugs to prevent movement is the spinal cord. The use of depth-of-anesthesia monitoring in children is not as well understood as in adults. Several monitoring devices are commercially available. The BIS monitor is the most thoroughly studied and most widely used, but the amount of information about other monitors is growing. In the future, depth-of-anesthesia monitoring will probably help in further refining and better understanding the process of administering anesthesia.

Does Cerebral Monitoring Improve Ophthalmic Surgical Operating Conditions During Propofol-Induced Sedation?

Sudden movements from over-sedation during ophthalmic surgery can be detrimental to the eye. Bispectral index (BIS) and middle-latency auditory-evoked potentials (Alaris AEP index, AAI) were reported to be accurate indicators for the level of sedation and loss of consciousness. We assessed these monitors during sedation with special emphasis on preventing over-sedation. One-hundred patients scheduled for elective eye surgery were sedated with target-controlled propofol infusion and randomly allocated to BIS-guided, AAI-guided, BIS/AAI-guided, or clinically guided groups (n = 25 each). The initial target concentration was 0.5 microg x mL(-1) in patients >70 yr and 1.0 microg x mL(-1) in all other patients. The concentration was increased every 3 min by 0.1 or 0.2 microg x mL(-1), respectively until the patient had reached a BIS value of 75 (range 70-90) or an AAI of 40 (range 35-60). The surgeon who was blinded to group allocation assessed treatment quality after the procedure. Sedation was converted into general anesthesia in four patients because of excessive head movements. BIS was out of range 7% of the time vs 58% for AAI. No significant differences in treatment quality were observed among the four groups. We conclude that propofol sedation, guided by BIS or AAI monitoring, did not enhance ophthalmic surgical operating conditions over sedation guided by clinical observation only.

Increase in high frequency EEG activity explains the poor performance of EEG spectral entropy monitor during S-ketamine anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of S-ketamine on the EEG and to investigate whether spectral entropy of the EEG can be used to assess the depth of hypnosis during S-ketamine anesthesia.

METHODS

The effects of sub-anesthetic (159 (21); mean (SD) ng/ml) and anesthetic (1,959 (442) ng/ml) serum concentrations of S-ketamine on state entropy (SE), response entropy (RE) and classical EEG spectral power variables (recorded using the Entropy Module, GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) were studied in 8 healthy males. These EEG data were compared with EEG recordings from 6 matching subjects anesthetized with propofol.

RESULTS

The entropy values decreased from the baseline SE 85 (3) and RE 96 (3) to SE 55 (18) and RE 72 (17) during S-ketamine anesthesia but both inter- and intra-individual variation of entropy indices was wide and their specificity to indicate unconsciousness was poor. Propofol induced more pronounced increase in delta power (P<0.02) than S-ketamine, whereas anesthetic S-ketamine induced more high frequency EEG activity in the gamma band (P<0.001). Relative power of 20-70 Hz EEG activity was associated with high SE (P=0.02) and RE (P=0.03) values during S-ketamine anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

These differences in low and high frequency EEG power bands probably explain why entropy monitor, while adequate for propofol, is not suitable for assessing the depth of S-ketamine anesthesia.

SIGNIFICANCE

The entropy monitor is not adequate for monitoring S-ketamine-induced hypnosis.

[Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in critical care children: preliminary study]

BACKGROUND

Middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) reflect changes in electroencephalogram waves after an auditory signal and represent the earliest cortical response to acoustic stimulus. They are therefore used to measure variations in the level of consciousness. MLEAP have been used to measure the depth of anesthesia during surgical procedures, but experience in critical care patients is very limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the utility of MLAEP for monitoring the level of sedation in critically ill children.

METHODS

Level of consciousness was monitored through MLAEP by placing special headphones and three sensors situated in the frontal and preauricular regions. Simultaneously, the level of sedation was measured using the COMFORT scale and the Bispectral Index (BIS) in distinct clinical situations.

RESULTS

We studied six critically ill children in whom MLAEP helped us to evaluate the level of consciousness: light sedation, natural sleep, deep sedation, sedation in a paralyzed child, and brain death. MLAEP showed a good correlation with the COMFORT scale and BIS in light and deep sedation and were effective in the early detection of brain death in one patient. In the paralyzed patient, MLAEP was able to detect undersedation. In one patient, a pacemaker interfered with the MLAEP signal.

CONCLUSIONS

MLAEP can be useful in evaluating the level of consciousness and sedation in critically ill children. Further studies with larger samples are required to analyze the limitations and reproducibility of this type of monitoring in children of different ages.

Update on bispectral index monitoring

Since 1997, bispectral index (BIS; Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Natick, MA) has been in clinical practice and a wealth of experimental research has accumulated on its use. Originally, the device was approved only for monitoring hypnosis and has now received an indication for reducing the incidence of intraoperative awareness during anesthesia. Numerous studies have documented the ability of BIS to reduce intermediate outcomes such as hypnotic drug administration, extubation time, postoperative nausea and shortened recovery room discharge. Two recent large-scale outcome studies using BIS (one randomized controlled trial and one prospective, nonrandomized historical cohort study) identified an approximately 80% reduction in the incidence of recall after anesthesia. BIS provides clinicians with unique information that can be used to tailor hypnotic drug doses to individual patient requirements. BIS does not predict movement or hemodynamic response to stimulation, nor will it predict the exact moment consciousness returns. This review will also discuss other BIS applications including use in pediatrics, intensive care and for procedural sedation. Some limitations exist to the use of BIS and it is not useful for some individual hypnotic agents (ketamine, dexmedetomidine, nitrous oxide, xenon, opioids). BIS technology is moving out of the operating room and into diverse environments where conscious and deep sedation are provided. Anesthesiologists need to be actively involved in promoting patient safety and helping transition this technology into broader use.

Closed loops in anaesthesia

Closed-loop systems are able to make their own decisions and to try to reach and maintain a preset target. As a result, they might help the anaesthetist to optimise the titration of drug administration without any overshoot, controlling physiological functions and guiding monitoring variables. Thanks to the development of fast computer technology and more reliable pharmacological effect measures, the study of automation in anaesthesia has regained popularity. This short review focuses on the most recently developed and tested feedback systems in anaesthesia. Various new approaches for controlling the administration of intravenous and inhaled hypnotic-anaesthetic drugs have recently been published. For analgesics, a framework for further research has been presented in the literature. For other drugs, such as muscle relaxants and haemodynamic agents, only short reviews can be found. Until now, most of these systems have had to be under development. The challenge is now fully to establish the safety, efficacy, reliability and utility of closed-loop anaesthesia so that it can be adopted in the clinical setting. Besides, their role in optimising the controlled variables and control models, these systems have to be tested in extreme circumstances in order to test their robustness.

Special cases: Ketamine, nitrous oxide and xenon

Most general anaesthetic agents produce anaesthesia by increasing the activity of inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. The effects of ketamine, xenon and nitrous oxide on these receptors are, however, negligible. These anaesthetic agents potently inhibit excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Although these anaesthetic agents display some similar clinical features, such as potent analgesic effects, there are some important differences. Ketamine and nitrous oxide produce sympathomimetic effects, whereas xenon produces a sympatholytic effect. In addition, these anaesthetic agents return differential signals on clinical available anaesthetic depth monitors such as the bispectral index and mid-latency auditory evoked potential. Ketamine and nitrous oxide do not per se decrease the bispectral index. However, xenon decreases the bispectral index in a concentration-dependent manner. Similarly, ketamine and nitrous oxide do not suppress the mid-latency auditory evoked potential whereas xenon does. Thus, anaesthetic depth monitors fail to describe consciousness accurately when ketamine and nitrous oxide are used.

Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics

BACKGROUND

Many studies have investigated the electroencephalographic changes during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, no comparative studies have been performed on the effects of intravenous anesthetics on the auditory evoked potentials index (AAI). The present study was performed to compare the changes in AAI caused by induction doses of thiopental, propofol, midazolam and ketamine.

METHODS

Eighty females, aged 30-70 years, referred for mastectomy, had anesthesia induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg or ketamine 1 mg/kg (each 20 patients). The response to verbal command and the AAI were measured every minute for 5 min.

RESULTS

The AAI decreased to less than 40 within 1 min with thiopental and propofol. The AAI increased after 3 min with thiopental, but remained low with propofol. The AAI gradually decreased to less than 40 within 4 min with midazolam, but was higher than the AAI with propofol or thiopental. The AAI increased significantly with ketamine. The AAIs at the loss of verbal command were 19 +/- 7 with thiopental, 21 +/- 8 with propofol, 31 +/- 10 with midazolam and 92 +/- 2 with ketamine.

CONCLUSION

The AAI correlated with changes in hypnotic level, as measured by the response to verbal command, with induction doses of thiopental, propofol and midazolam, but not with ketamine. The AAI decreased to lower levels with propofol and thiopental than with midazolam at the induction of anesthesia.