New active substances authorized in the United Kingdom between 1972 and 1994

The severity of adverse drug reactions and their influencing factors based on the ADR monitoring center of Henan Province

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may be a serious public health problem and have received widespread attention in recent years. This study has analyzed the factors leading to the occurrence of serious ADRs (SADRs), determined the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with severe adverse reactions at different levels of medical institutions, and finally made corresponding recommendations for the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of SADRs. We used descriptive analysis and chi-square test to analyze the year, age, gender, proportion of SADRs, and the results of the ADRs in the report. Use the logistic regression to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of SADRs in different levels of medical institutions. A total of 387 642 people’s 394 037 ADRs were collected from the Henan Provincial Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center from 2016 to 2020. Among them 35 742 cases of serious ADRs (9.1%), 96.1% were eventually relieved or cured, but 39 cases of SADRs caused death. The main causes of death included hemorrhages, organ failure, and allergies. Age, number of medication and illnesses, level of medical institution, history of adverse reactions, and type and method of medication were all factors that affected the severity of ADR. The prognosis of SADRs is worse than normal ADRs. The ADRs in autumn and winter and new adverse reactions are unique risk factors found in this study. The elderly and patients with multiple diseases or taking multiple drugs should pay attention to their adverse reactions. They should be closely observed within a week after taking the medicine. The supervision of patients with a history of allergies and new adverse reactions should be strengthened by primary medical institutions, and in nonprimary medical institutions should paid attention with past medical histories, and use imported drugs and biological agents with caution to ensure the safety and health of patients.

A Method for Detecting Adverse Drug Events through the Chronological Relationship Between the Medication Period and the Presence of Adverse Reactions from Electronic Medical Record Systems: Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Medicines may cause various adverse reactions. An enormous amount of money and effort are spent investigating adverse drug events (ADEs) in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance. Real-world data from multiple electronic medical records (EMRs) can make it easy to understand the ADEs that occur in actual patients.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we generated a patient medication history database from physician orders recorded in EMRs, which allowed the period of medication to be clearly identified.

METHODS

We developed a method for detecting ADEs based on the chronological relationship between the presence of an adverse event and the medication period. To verify our method, we detected ADEs with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation in patients receiving aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine. The accuracy of the detection was evaluated with a chart review and by comparison with the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), which is a standard method for detecting drug induced liver injury.

RESULTS

The calculated rates of ADE with ALT elevation in patients receiving aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine were 3.33% (868 of 26,059 patients), 3.70% (188 of 5,076 patients) and 5.69% (226 of 3,974 patients), respectively, which were in line with the rates of previous reports. We reviewed the medical records of the patients in whom ADEs were detected. Our method accurately predicted ADEs in 90% (27 of 30patients) treated with aspirin, 100% (9 of 9 patients) treated with clopidogrel and 100% (4 of 4 patients) treated with ticlopidine. Only 3 ADEs that were detected by the RUCAM were not detected by our method.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that the present method is effective for detecting ADEs based on EMR data.

CLINICALTRIAL

Parliament in action: Drug withdrawals and policy changes in the U.K

Previous studies on changes in health policies theorize such changes either as crises responses, or as the outcome of longer-term stakeholder conflicts. In this paper, we propose that parliaments function as overlooked, intermediate actors that contribute to translating the interests of stakeholders into policy changes. We study the role of parliament connecting policy makers and stakeholders in the context of drug regulation. Based on three high-profile cases of drug withdrawals between 1991 and 2005 in the United Kingdom (triazolam, rofecoxib, and co-proxamol), we distinguish partisan-political, individual-idiosyncratic, and collective-institutional pathways of parliamentary action on drug withdrawals. Distinguishing direct and indirect actions, we argue that indirect courses of action, including advocacy and educational work, can be just as effective as regular legislative endeavours, under certain conditions.

Implications of product withdrawal on a post-approval pragmatic trial: The VOLUME study experience

INTRODUCTION

Many clinical trials terminate early due to safety and efficacy concerns, and less often due to unexpected "positive" findings. However, early termination of post-approval (Phase IV) pragmatic randomized trials for commercial reasons is less frequent, may be more complex, and may require added flexibility in closure methods, including short term follow-up. VOLUME was a randomized, open-label, post-approval pragmatic clinical trial (PCT) or large simple trial that terminated early due to product withdrawal. The aim of this paper is to describe circumstances unique to post-approval PCTs that may require a closure amendment rather than immediate study termination, and our recommendations for operational study closure in these circumstances. We use the VOLUME case study throughout to provide a practical example.

METHODS

Study closeout considerations at the study level include: notifying external governance bodies, e.g., data monitoring committees (DMC), and scientific steering committees (SSC); executing a study closure amendment; notifying and training of study physicians; and institutional review board (IRB)/ethics committee (EC) approvals. Study closure considerations at the patient level focus on patient safety and include: patient notification, efficient transition to alternative treatments, the need for re-consenting; and drug supply shortages.

CONCLUSIONS

Early study closeout logistics require careful analysis, detailed planning, and close coordination, and are ideally considered at the study planning phase. Lessons learned from the VOLUME closeout should help other researchers devise contingencies when terminating post approval pragmatic trials that utilize a marketed product.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00359801.

ADReCS-Target: target profiles for aiding drug safety research and application

Delivering safe and effective therapeutic treatment to patients is one of the grand challenges in modern medicine. However, drug safety research has been progressing slowly in recent years, compared to other fields such as biotechnologies and precision medicine, due to the mechanistic complexity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). To fill up this gap, we develop a new database, the Adverse Drug Reaction Classification System-Target Profile (ADReCS-Target, http://bioinf.xmu.edu.cn/ADReCS-Target), which provides comprehensive information about ADRs caused by drug interaction with protein, gene and genetic variation. In total, ADReCS-Target includes 66,573 pairwise relations, among which 1710 are protein–ADR associations, 2613 are genetic variation–ADR associations, and 63,298 are gene–ADR associations. In a case study of exploring the mechanism of rash, we find that HLAs, C1QA and APOA1 are the key gene players and thus can be potential targets (or biomarkers) in monitoring or countermining rashes. In summary, ADReCS-Target can be a useful resource for the biomedical scientific community by serving researchers in the fields of drug development, clinical pharmacology, precision medicine, and from web lab to high-throughput computational platform. Particularly, it helps to identify drug with better ADR profile and design safer drug therapy regimen.

Screening of anticancer drugs to detect drug-induced interstitial pneumonia using the accumulated data in the electronic medical record

Because drug-induced interstitial pneumonia (DIP) is a serious adverse drug reaction, its quantitative risk with individual medications should be taken into due consideration when selecting a medicine. We developed an algorithm to detect DIP using medical record data accumulated in a hospital. Chest computed tomography (CT) is mainly used for the diagnosis of IP, and chest X-ray reports, KL-6, and SP-D values are used to support the diagnosis. The presence of IP in the reports was assessed by a method using natural language-processing, in which IP was estimated according to the product of the likelihood ratio of characteristic keywords in each report. The sensitivity and the specificity of the method for chest CT reports were 0.92 and 0.97, while those for chest X-ray reports were 0.83 and 1, respectively. The occurrence of DIP was estimated by the patterns of presence of IP before, during, and after the administration of the target medicine. The occurrence rate of DIP in cases administered Gefitinib; Methotrexate (MTX); Tegafur, Gimeracil, and Oteracil potassium (TS-1); and Tegafur and Uracil (UTF) was 6.0%, 2.3%, 1.4%, and 0.7%, respectively. The estimated DIP cases were checked by having the medical records independently reviewed by medical doctors. By chart review, the positive predictive values of DIP against Gefitinib, MTX, TS-1, and UFT were 69.2%, 44.4%, 58.6%, and 77.8%, respectively. Although the cases extracted by this method included some that did not have DIP, this method can estimate the relative risk of DIP between medicines.

Investigation assessing the publicly available evidence supporting postmarketing withdrawals, revocations and suspensions of marketing authorisations in the EU since 2012

OBJECTIVES

To assess the sources of publicly available evidence supporting withdrawal, revocation or suspension of marketing authorisations ('regulatory actions') due to safety reasons in the EU since 2012 and to investigate the time taken since initial marketing authorisation to reach these regulatory decisions.

SETTING

This investigation examined the sources of evidence supporting 18 identified prescription medicinal products which underwent regulatory action due to safety reasons within the EU in the period 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

Eighteen single or combined active substances ('medicinal products') withdrawn, revoked or suspended within the EU for safety reasons between 2012 and 2016 met the inclusion criteria. Case reports were most commonly cited, supporting 94.4% of regulatory actions (n=17), followed by randomised controlled trial, meta-analyses, animal and in vitro, ex vivo or in silico study designs, each cited in 72.2% of regulatory actions (n=13). Epidemiological study designs were least commonly cited (n=8, 44.4%). Multiple sources of evidence contributed to 94.4% of regulatory decisions (n=17). Death was the most common adverse drug reaction leading to regulatory action (n=5; 27.8%), with four of these related to medication error or overdose. Median (IQR) time taken to reach a decision from the start of regulatory review was found to be 204.5 days (143, 535 days) and decreased across the study period. Duration of marketing prior to regulatory action, from the medicinal product's authorisation date, increased across the period 2012-2016.

CONCLUSIONS

The sources of evidence supporting pharmacovigilance regulatory activities appear to have changed since implementation of Directive 2010/84/EU and Regulation (EU) No. 1235/2010. This, together with a small improvement in regulatory efficiency, suggests progress towards more rapid regulatory decisions based on more robust evidence. Future research should continue to monitor sources of evidence supporting regulatory decisions and the time taken to reach these decisions over time.

WITHDRAWN--a resource for withdrawn and discontinued drugs

Post-marketing drug withdrawals can be associated with various events, ranging from safety issues such as reported deaths or severe side-effects, to a multitude of non-safety problems including lack of efficacy, manufacturing, regulatory or business issues. During the last century, the majority of drugs voluntarily withdrawn from the market or prohibited by regulatory agencies was reported to be related to adverse drug reactions. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of toxicity is of utmost importance for current and future drug discovery. Here, we present WITHDRAWN, a resource for withdrawn and discontinued drugs publicly accessible at http://cheminfo.charite.de/withdrawn. Today, the database comprises 578 withdrawn or discontinued drugs, their structures, important physico-chemical properties, protein targets and relevant signaling pathways. A special focus of the database lies on the drugs withdrawn due to adverse reactions and toxic effects. For approximately one half of the drugs in the database, safety issues were identified as the main reason for withdrawal. Withdrawal reasons were extracted from the literature and manually classified into toxicity types representing adverse effects on different organs. A special feature of the database is the presence of multiple search options which will allow systematic analyses of withdrawn drugs and their mechanisms of toxicity.

Glucuronidation of drugs and drug-induced toxicity in humanized UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 mice

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes that catalyze glucuronidation of various drugs. Although experimental rodents are used in preclinical studies to predict glucuronidation and toxicity of drugs in humans, species differences in glucuronidation and drug-induced toxicity have been reported. Humanized UGT1 mice in which the original Ugt1 locus was disrupted and replaced with the human UGT1 locus (hUGT1 mice) were recently developed. In this study, acyl-glucuronidations of etodolac, diclofenac, and ibuprofen in liver microsomes of hUGT1 mice were examined and compared with those of humans and regular mice. The kinetics of etodolac, diclofenac, and ibuprofen acyl-glucuronidation in hUGT1 mice were almost comparable to those in humans, rather than in mice. We further investigated the hepatotoxicity of ibuprofen in hUGT1 mice and regular mice by measuring serum alanine amino transferase (ALT) levels. Because ALT levels were increased at 6 hours after dosing in hUGT1 mice and at 24 hours after dosing in regular mice, the onset pattern of ibuprofen-induced liver toxicity in hUGT1 mice was different from that in regular mice. These data suggest that hUGT1 mice can be valuable tools for understanding glucuronidations of drugs and drug-induced toxicity in humans.

Decline in new drug launches: myth or reality? Retrospective observational study using 30 years of data from the UK

OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in new drugs launched in the UK from 1982 to 2011 and test the hypothesis that the rate of new drug introductions has declined over the study period. There is wide concern that pharmaceutical innovation is declining. Reported trends suggest that fewer new drugs have been launched over recent decades, despite increasing investment into research and development.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study. SETTING AND DATA SOURCE: Database of new preparations added annually to the British National Formulary (BNF).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of new drugs entered each year, including new chemical entities(NCEs) and new biological drugs, based on first appearance in the BNF.

RESULTS

There was no significant linear trend in the number of new drugs introduced into the UK from 1982 to 2011. Following a dip in the mid-1980s (11-12 NCEs/new biologics introduced annually from 1985 to 1987), there was a variable increase in the numbers of new drugs introduced annually to a peak of 34 in 1997. This peak was followed by a decline to approximately 20 new drugs/year between 2003 and 2006, and another peak in 2010. Extending the timeline further back with existing published data shows an overall slight increase in new drug introductions of 0.16/year over the entire 1971 to 2011 period.

CONCLUSIONS

The purported 'innovation dip' is an artefact of the time periods previously studied. Reports of declining innovation need to be considered in the context of their timescale and perspective.

Market withdrawal of new molecular entities approved in the United States from 1980 to 2009

PURPOSE

Economic factors, market dynamics, and safety issues are largely responsible for decisions to withdraw pharmaceutical products from the market. In this study, new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were examined in the USA from 1980 to 2009.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the FDA, Micromedex, Medline, and Lexis-Nexis. Descriptive analyses were used to classify product discontinuations by therapeutic category, time frame for discontinuation, and reason for withdrawal.

RESULTS

There were 740 NMEs approved by the FDA during the study period. As of 1 December 2010, the number of drugs discontinued was 118 (15.9%). Discontinuations were the highest for antiparasitic products, insecticides, and repellents (6, 33.3% of approvals), systemic hormonal preparations excluding sex hormones and insulins (5, 33.3%), musculo-skeletal system (11, 32.4%), diagnostic agents (16, 28.1%), and anti-infectives for systemic use (27, 25.2%). Safety was the primary reason for withdrawing 26 drugs (3.5% of approvals).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in seven approved NMEs were discontinued from the market in the period of 1980-2009. Less than one-quarter (22%) of the total withdrawals were attributed to safety reasons. An ongoing evaluation of new drugs throughout their product life cycle is important to determine their efficacy, safety, and value to society.

Prescribing new drugs: a survey of hospital consultants in the West Midlands

Objective

To investigate the factors that influence how consultants introduce new drugs into their clinical practice.

Method

A postal questionnaire survey of hospital consultants.

Setting

169 consultants in medical specialties in six hospitals (general or teaching hospitals) in the West Midlands region, United Kingdom.

Key findings

Ninety-two completed questionnaires (54 per cent) were returned. Eighty consultants (87 per cent) reported using a new drug in the previous two years; 60 (65 per cent) had used either one or two new drugs and these were generally in their specialist field. There was no significant difference between hospitals in how easy it was to introduce a new drug. Sixty-one consultants (67 per cent) said that the procedure required an application to the hospital drug and therapeutics committee. Consultants frequently asked patients' general practitioners to prescribe a new drug. Consultants rated independent sources of information more highly than non-independent sources. The most important factors reported to influence prescribing decisions about new drugs were drug characteristics, such as efficacy and safety, and evidence from scientific literature. Sixty-four respondents (70 per cent) saw drug company representatives up to once a week and 57 (62 per cent) had been involved in clinical trials of new drugs in the previous five years.

Conclusion

In general, the consultants reported that they used only a small number of new drugs. There is considerable pressure on hospital doctors to control prescribing and costs of new drugs through policies that require approval by the drug and therapeutics committee. Although contact with the pharmaceutical industry was high, consultants reported that independent sources of information were more important. Factors such as clinical trial evidence and improved drug characteristics were said to be the most influential in reaching decisions to prescribe new drugs.

The keap1-nrf2 cellular defense pathway: mechanisms of regulation and role in protection against drug-induced toxicity

Adverse drug reactions pose a significant public health problem. In some cases, the process of drug metabolism can contribute to the onset of toxicity through the bioactivation of a parent molecule to a chemically reactive intermediate. In order to maintain a favorable balance between bioactivation and detoxification, mammalian cells have evolved an inducible cell defense system known as the antioxidant response pathway. The activity of this cytoprotective pathway is largely regulated by the transcription factor Nrf2, which governs the expression of many phase II detoxification and antioxidant enzymes. In turn, the activity of Nrf2 is regulated by the cysteine-rich cytosolic inhibitor Keap1, which acts as a "sensor" for chemical/oxidative stress. This article summarizes our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate the function of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway and highlights the importance of Nrf2 in the protection against drug-induced toxicity.

An assessment of the publicly disseminated evidence of safety used in decisions to withdraw medicinal products from the UK and US markets

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the publicly disseminated evidence used to support decisions to withdraw medicinal products for safety reasons, and related implications for the conduct of systematic reviews of harm.

METHODS

Medicinal products withdrawn from the UK and US markets for safety reasons were identified from websites of the UK Medicines Control Agency (now known as the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) and the US FDA. Related scientific evidence was identified from communications made to the public and healthcare professionals at the time of each product withdrawal. Evidence for each product withdrawal decision was classified according to study design and outcome.

RESULTS

Eleven products were withdrawn during 1999-2001. Randomised trial evidence was cited for two products (18%) and comparative observational studies for two products (18%). Evidence from spontaneous reports supported the withdrawal of eight products (73%), with four products (36%) apparently withdrawn on the basis of spontaneous reports alone. Only two products (18%) were withdrawn on evidence for a patient relevant outcome from comparative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is rare that evidence other than spontaneous reports is cited in support of drug withdrawals. The serious implications of product withdrawal mandate the elevation of the level of evidence that supports such public health decisions. Once suspicions of important safety hazards have emerged, prospective studies may be unfeasible and may be seen as unethical. Prospective studies can strengthen the evidence base and should be planned to commence when every drug is first marketed. Systematic reviews are unlikely to elicit evidence of harm associated with a drug unless they include spontaneous reports and surrogate outcomes.

Pharmacogenomics and individualized drug therapy

Pharmacogenetics deals with inherited differences in the response to drugs. The best-recognized examples are genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which affect about 30% of all drugs. Loss of function of thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) results in severe and life-threatening hematopoietic toxicity if patients receive standard doses of mercaptopurine and azathioprine. Gene duplication of cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6), which metabolizes many antidepressants, has been identified as a mechanism of poor response in the treatment of depression. There is also a growing list of genetic polymorphisms in drug targets that have been shown to influence drug response. A major limitation that has heretofore moderated the use of pharmacogenetic testing in the clinical setting is the lack of prospective clinical trials demonstrating that such testing can improve the benefit/risk ratio of drug therapy.

The nature of the scientific evidence leading to drug withdrawals for pharmacovigilance reasons in France

INTRODUCTION

Because of design, objectives and number of included subjects, clinical studies are insufficient to assess the safety of new drugs. Sometimes, serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) led to withdrawal of the drug from the market after their approval. The objective of our study was to determine the scientific evidences leading to drug withdrawal for pharmacovigilance reasons in France.

METHODS

Data coming from French Health Products Safety Agency, literature and Toulouse Pharmacovigilance Center allowed to identify all drugs withdrawn from the French market for pharmacovigilance reasons from 1998 to 2004. We classified data according to their study design (Randomized Clinical Trial [RCT], case serie or case report, case-control study, cohort study, observational study, animal study), the organ/system affected and the type of ADR.

RESULTS

A total of 21 drugs were withdrawn for safety reasons between 1998 and 2004 in France. The most frequent ADRs were hepatic (n = 7), cardiovascular (n = 4) or neurological (n = 3) ones. Eleven withdrawals were due to type-B ('unexpected') reactions (52%). For 19 out of 21 drugs, scientific evidence leading to drug withdrawal came from spontaneous case reports (or case series). Among these, case reports were the sole evidence in 12 cases. Withdrawals were based on evidence from case reports in combination with case-control or cohort study in four cases, in combination with observational study in two cases or in combination with animal study in two other cases. In only one case, a RCT supported the decision.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the importance of spontaneous case reports in detecting signals and supporting withdrawal of drug for pharmacovigilance reasons in France. Health authorities suffer from lack of comparative data resource. In this perspective, a pharmaco-epidemiological population-based database could represent a helpful tool to both generate and test safety hypotheses.

Changes in the defined daily dose; CYP2D6/CYP3A metabolism as an indicator for dose-setting problems

OBJECTIVE

Interindividual variability is common at all stages of drug absorption, distribution, pharmacodynamics, metabolism and elimination. In this study, we focused on two enzymes involved in phase-I drug metabolism as markers of pharmacological variability: the CYP3A and CYP2D6 subsystems of cytochrome P450. The main aim of our study was to determine whether substrate drugs for CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A enzymes, showing high interindividual matabolic variability, are more prone to postmarketing adjustments of defined daily dose (DDD).

METHODS

A case-control design was used. We identified all DDD changes between 1982 and May 2004 through the website of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Cases were drugs with a DDD change and controls were other drugs with unchanged DDDs. Information about metabolism pathway, introduction year, literature exposure and administration route was retrieved.

RESULTS

We included 88 cases and 176 controls. Of the 88 cases, 51 were dosage decreases (58.0%). Overall, DDD changes were not associated with CYP2D6/CYP3A metabolism (OR 1.92; 95%CI 0.78-4.72). However, DDD decreases were associated with CYP2D6/CYP3A metabolism (OR 3.21; 95%CI 1.25-8.26). Adjusting for introduction year weakened this effect (OR 2.78; 95%CI 0.98-7.90).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that CYP2D6 and CYP3A substrates are more likely to require a DDD decrease after granting of market authorisation. However, this effect was diminished by adjusting for period of introduction. The implication of this finding is that variability indicators, as is demonstrated in this study for CYP2D6/CYP3A metabolism, can exert their influence on a wide variety of drug measures, such as the DDD.

A comparative analysis of drug safety withdrawals in the UK and the US (1971-1992): implications for current regulatory thinking and policy

By going beyond individual case studies and solely quantitative surveys, this paper systematically examines why there were over twice as many new prescription drugs withdrawn from the market on grounds of safety in the UK as there were in the US between 1971 and 1992. Drawing on interviews with regulators, industry scientists and others involved, and on regulatory data never before accessed outside governments and companies, five key hypotheses which might explain this difference in drug safety withdrawals are analysed. These are: (1) simply because the UK approved more new drugs than the US; (2) because of an industrial corporate strategy to seek approval of 'less safe' drugs in the UK earlier; (3) because British regulators were more vigilant at spotting post-marketing safety problems than their US counterparts; (4) because the slowness of the US in approving new drugs enabled regulators there to learn from, and avoid, safety problems that had already emerged in the UK or European market; and (5) because more stringent regulation in the US meant that they approved fewer unsafe drugs on to the market in the first place. It is concluded that the main explanation for fewer drug safety withdrawals in the US is that the regulatory agency there applied more stringent pre-market review and/or standards, which took longer than UK regulatory checks, but prevented unsafe drugs marketed in the UK from entering the US market. Contrary to the claims frequently made by the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies on both sides of the Atlantic, these results imply that it is likely that acceleration of regulatory review times in the US and the UK since the early 1990s is compromising drug safety.

Emergent patterns in the regulation of pharmaceuticals: institutions and interests in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France

Although industrialized nations regulate pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy, they balance these concerns with those related to the timeliness of the approval process and the burdens involved in meeting regulatory criteria. The United States, Canada, Britain, and France have adopted different approaches to the regulation of pharmaceuticals that place varying emphases on these competing goals and involve the participation of private interests to different extents. The regulatory approval processes and the government-industry relationships inherent within them are compared in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France by analyzing five features that distinguish the U.S. pluralist from the European corporatist approaches to policy development: representation (internal versus external), process (closed versus open), stance (informal, accommodative versus formal, adversarial), institutional power (fragmented versus centralized), and resources. An institutional framework further characterizes these approaches as based on models of managerial discretion and adjudication (United States), consultation (Canada), and bargaining (Britain, France) to clarify the patterns that emerge. While the approach that most effectively supports product safety involves managerial discretion as occurs in the United States, formal mechanisms for negotiation might be incorporated rather than a reliance on the judicial process. In an era of globalization and regulatory harmonization such divergence has significant implications. First, where harmonization in Europe involves the mutual recognition of one country's product licensing decision by the others, differences in evaluative processes remain important. Second, as harmonization leads to a common set of regulatory criteria, the criteria adopted tend to be those of nations with the least stringent regulatory standards, making evident the need for more responsive systems of post-market surveillance to protect the public interest.

Genome-based pharmacogenetics and the pharmaceutical industry

Pharmacogenetic capabilities have changed markedly since The SNP Consortium made a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map freely available in 2001. For more than 40 years, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug-metabolizing molecules were the focus of practical applications. Today, it is possible to use SNP-mapping technologies to create a genetic profile of each individual that can be used to identify patterns of susceptibility genes for common diseases as well as genetic risk/efficacy factors that are related to the effects of drugs.

Toxicoproteomics -- a new preclinical tool

The publication of the human genome has presented the scientific community with an unprecedented amount of genetic information with the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process. This information could be used to identify novel drug targets and disease markers or could aid in the development of personalized medicines. The realization that genetic changes must ultimately influence protein function has pushed the field of proteomics further into the limelight. In this review the applications of proteomics to the field of toxicology will be discussed. It is anticipated that, in the future, toxicologists will apply a range of genomic and proteomic techniques to address issues in toxicity.

The quality and characteristics of clinical drug study notifications reviewed by the regulatory agency in Finland

The aim of our study was to investigate the validity of clinical drug study notifications reviewed by the regulatory agency in Finland during the 1990s. (In practice, the notification is equivalent to tacit authorization, which the agency has full powers to revoke before it takes effect.) All clinical drug studies reviewed by the agency during the years 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998 were studied retrospectively. The main measurements used were the number of studies with no objection to start; the number and type of questions raised; the profile, phase, and type of study; and the study design. Additionally, the studies approved by two ethics committees of university hospitals during the same years were cross-checked to see whether the agency was notified of them in accordance with the national regulations. In total, 1174 study notifications were reviewed. Most studies were international (52%), phase III (46%), placebo-controlled with/without active control (35%) investigations of new chemical entities (38%) and were carried out in university hospitals (63%). The regulatory agency had no objections or questions regarding 55% of the notifications; 37% of the studies were permitted to begin after a clarification; 5% had to be clarified a second time; and 3% were rejected. Most questions dealt with subject information. Out of the 1140 permitted studies, 8% were later canceled or prematurely terminated as reported by the applicant. Altogether 71% of the studies that had been reviewed and approved by the ethics committees were reported to the authorities before commencement. Study completions were rarely reported. Most of the clinical drug studies planned in Finland are large international studies to investigate new chemical entities. More than half of the notifications are valid according to the regulatory authorities. Not all studies, nor the majority of study completions, are reported to the authority, though according to the regulations they should be so reported. The results show that better compliance with regulatory requirements is needed, and the contents of submitted documents should be improved to gain better Good Clinical Practice compliance. The regulatory agencies and committees that review clinical study documents should improve their current practices by a more specific division of responsibilities.

Drugs, the human genome, and individual-based medicine

The so-called "Genomic Revolution" has made possible the high-resolution sequencing of the DNA making up the human genome. One of the main conclusions of the currently available sequencing data is that individuals differ genetically from one another via sequence variations in their genomes. When affected genes are transcribed and translated, some of these sequence variations result in protein products that may affect the functioning of the proteins. This has led to widespread optimism that information on an individual's pattern of sequence variations will lead to drugs that target that individual's variant proteins and make "individual-based medicine" possible. I this chapter some of the assumptions underlying the proposed production of individual drug treatments are examined. The assumptions are viewed in the light of very recent experimental evidence about the sequence patterns found in humans. Also discussed are ancillary ethical problems in cataloging and using databases containing individuals' sequence data, what human genomic sequences are revealing about the use of animal models in developing drugs, and how evidence is mounting that the human genome is only one element serving to maintain an organism's interaction with its environment.

Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major clinical problem. Genetic factors can determine individual susceptibility to both dose-dependent and dose-independent ADRs. Determinants of susceptibility include kinetic factors, such as gene polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes, and dynamic factors, such as polymorphisms in drug targets. The relative importance of these factors will depend on the nature of the ADR; however, it is likely that more than one gene will be involved in most instances. In the future, whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling might allow an unbiased method of determining genetic predisposing factors for ADRs, but might be limited by the lack of adequate numbers of patient samples. The overall clinical utility of genotyping in preventing ADRs needs to be proven by the use of prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.

Metabolic activation in drug allergies

Drug allergies are a major problem in the clinic and during drug development. At the present time, it is not possible to predict the potential of a new chemical entity to produce an allergic reaction (hypersensitivity) in patients in preclinical development. Such adverse reactions, because of their idiosyncratic nature, only become apparent once the drug has been licensed. Our present chemical understanding of drug hypersensitivity is based on the hapten hypothesis, in which covalent binding of the drug (metabolite) plays a central role in drug immunogenicity and antigenicity. If this theory is correct, then it should be possible to develop in vitro systems to assess the potential of drugs to bind to critical proteins, either directly or indirectly after metabolic activation to protein-reactive metabolites (bioactivation) and initiate hypersensitivity. The purpose of this review is to assess critically the evidence to support the hapten mechanism, and also to consider alternative mechanisms by which drugs cause idiosyncratic toxicity.

Pharmacovigilance: a science or fielding emergencies?

Pharmacovigilance involves the assessment of risks and benefits of medicines. There are legal and regulatory aspects of this process, and the licensing of a new medicine is always provisional. The systems, in the past, have had limited statistical involvement, either in terms of personnel who are statistically trained, or in terms of statistical methods. This is changing. The high profile activities of pharmacovigilance have often been emergencies, though most is routine activity. Application of statistical thinking and of techniques is being done to help detect adverse effects of medicines rather earlier so that some emergencies may be avoided.

Advances in molecular toxicology-towards understanding idiosyncratic drug toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity is a major complication of drug therapy and drug development. Such adverse drug reactions (ADRs) include anaphylaxis, blood dyscrasias, hepatotoxicity and severe cutaneous reactions. They are usually serious and can be fatal. At present, prediction of idiosyncratic ADRs at the preclinical stage of drug development is not possible because there are no suitable animal models and we do not understand the basic mechanisms involved in the toxicity when it does occur in man. Many idiosyncratic reactions appear to have an immunological aetiology. For example, there is increasing evidence for the role of T lymphocytes in severe skin reactions. Nevertheless, the sequence of events by which a simple chemical can elicit severe tissue damage remains poorly understood and alternative novel mechanisms of toxicity must also be explored. The purpose of this article will be to review the currently accepted mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug toxicity at the chemical and the molecular levels. In particular, we will consider how recent advances in cellular immunology and molecular biology can improve our understanding of both the chemical and clinical aspects of drug hypersensitivity. Recent advances in the role of both inter- and intra-cellular signalling in the regulation of the immune response to drugs and their metabolites will be discussed. The long-term aim of such research is to provide test systems for the evaluation of drug safety and patient susceptibility to idiosyncratic drug toxicity.