Systemic availability of budesonide after nasal administration of three different formulations: pressurized aerosol, aqueous pump spray, and powder

First-In-Human Study on Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Escalating Doses of PA9159 Nasal Spray, a Highly Potent Glucocorticoid in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

OBJECTIVE

PA9159 (previously named VSG159) is a structurally novel and highly potent glucocorticoid that plays a role in the late development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The current first-in-human ascending-dose study of the PA9159 nasal spray was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers to evaluate its pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. In addition, the effects of PA9159 on serum cortisol secretion were investigated.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study that included four single-dose groups in the single ascending dose cohort (SAD) and two multiple-dose groups in the multiple ascending dose cohort (MAD), with dose ranges of 10-80 μg and 20-40 μg, respectively. PA9159 was administered bilaterally via nasal spray once only or once daily for seven days. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 60 participants completed the study. PA9159 doses of up to 80 μg in the SAD and up to 40 μg in the MAD were shown to be safe and tolerable. The most common treatment-related AEs were mild and transient local nasal AEs. Morning serum cortisol levels approximately remained unchanged in both the single-dose and multiple-dose groups. PA9159 was quantified in 41.8% (368/880) of the samples in all treatment groups, including 25.2% (105/416) of the SAD and 56.7% (263/464) of the MAD. The majority (>80.0%) of PA9159 plasma concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 2 pg/mL in determined samples. The mean AUC0-t of PA9159 in the SAD was 0.91, 1.39±0.68, 11.40±9.91, and 46.30±25.80 h*pg/mL in the 10 to 80 ug single group. The mean terminal half-life time (t1/2) was 8.43 h and 8.97±2.28 h in 40 ug and 80 ug single group, respectively. The mean AUCss of PA9159 in the MAD was 31.70±7.04, 44.20±20.60 h*pg /mL, and the t1/2 was 16.00±4.18 h, 21.20±10.20 h in the 20 ug and 40 ug multiple groups, respectively. The median Tmax was approximately 6 hours in both the SAD and MAD cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The PA9159 nasal spray was generally safe and well tolerated, and the effects of PA9159 on serum cortisol levels were limited. The plasma concentration and systemic exposure to PA9159 were very low. These findings support the necessity for further clinical studies on PA9159 nasal spray in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.

Sensitivity of Pharmacokinetics to Differences in the Particle Size Distribution for Formulations of Locally Acting Mometasone Furoate Suspension-Based Nasal Sprays

To assess bioequivalence of locally acting suspension-based nasal sprays, the U.S. FDA currently recommends a weight-of-evidence approach. In addition to in vitro and human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, this includes a comparative clinical endpoint study to ensure equivalent bioavailability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) at the site of action. The present study aimed to assess, within an in vitro/in vivo correlation paradigm, whether PK studies and dissolution kinetics are sensitive to differences in drug particle size for a locally acting suspension-based nasal spray product. Two investigational suspension-based nasal formulations of mometasone furoate (MF-I and MF-II; delivered dose: 180 μg) differed in API particle size and were compared in a single-center, double-blind, single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover PK study in 44 healthy subjects with oral charcoal block. Morphology-directed Raman spectroscopy yielded volume median diameters of 3.17 μm for MF-I and 5.50 μm for MF-II, and dissolution studies showed that MF-II had a slower dissolution profile than MF-I. The formulation with larger API particles (MF-II) showed a 45% smaller Cmax and 45% smaller AUC0-inf compared to those of MF-I. Systemic bioavailability of MF-I (2.20%) and MF-II (1.18%) correlated well with the dissolution kinetics, with the faster dissolving formulation yielding the higher bioavailability. This agreement between pharmacokinetics and dissolution kinetics cross-validated both methods and supported their use in assessing potential differences in slowly dissolving suspension-based nasal spray products.

Applicability of RPMI 2650 and Calu-3 Cell Models for Evaluation of Nasal Formulations

The RPMI 2650 and Calu-3 cell lines have been previously evaluated as models of the nasal and airway epithelial barrier, and they have demonstrated the potential to be used in drug permeation studies. However, limited data exist on the utilization of these two cell models for the assessment of nasal formulations. In our study, we tested these cell lines for the evaluation of in vitro permeation of intranasally administered drugs having a local and systemic effect from different solution- and suspension-based formulations to observe how the effects of formulations reflect on the measured in vitro drug permeability. Both models were shown to be sufficiently discriminative and able to reveal the effect of formulation compositions on drug permeability, as they demonstrated differences in the in vitro drug permeation comparable to the in vivo bioavailability. Good correlation with the available bioavailability data was also established for a limited number of drugs formulated as intranasal solutions. The investigated cell lines can be applied to the evaluation of in vitro permeation of intranasally administered drugs with a local and systemic effect from solution- and suspension-based formulations.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of a Generic and a Branded Budesonide Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Subjects

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of a generic budesonide nasal spray and a branded product in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting condition. A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 32 healthy Chinese subjects under fasting condition. The subjects were administered 256 μg of generic budesonide nasal spray (test drug) or branded budesonide nasal spray (RHINOCORT AQUA, reference drug), respectively. For each period, the subjects were administered with 64 μg of budesonide per spray and 2 sprays for each nostril followed by a washout period of 7 days. Plasma concentration of budesonide was determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated, and the bioequivalence was compared using the noncompartment model with the Phoenix WinNonlin 7.0 program. Results show that the 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference ratios of maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for the budesonide concentration were 84.8% to 102.7%, 84.6% to 94.4%, and 85.4% to 95.2%, respectively, all fall within the bioequivalent range of 80% to 125%. The test and reference budesonide nasal sprays were PK bioequivalents in healthy Chinese subjects with comparable PK parameters. No serious adverse events were reported, and the 2 products have a good and similar safety profile.

A novel approach to improve detection of glucocorticoid doping in sport with new guidance for physicians prescribing for athletes

The systemic effect of glucocorticoids (GCs) following injectable routes of administration presents a potential risk to both improving performance and causing harm to health in athletes. This review evaluates the current GC antidoping regulations defined by the World Anti-Doping Agency and presents a novel approach for defining permitted and prohibited use of glucocorticoids in sport based on the pharmacological potential for performance enhancement (PE) and risk of adverse effects on health. Known performance-enhancing doses of glucocorticoids are expressed in terms of cortisol-equivalent doses and thereby the dose associated with a high potential for PE for any GC and route of administration can be derived. Consequently, revised and substance-specific laboratory reporting values are presented to better distinguish between prohibited and permitted use in sport. In addition, washout periods are presented to enable clinicians to prescribe glucocorticoids safely and to avoid the risk of athletes testing positive for a doping test.

Budesonide transnasal pulsating nebulization after surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Intranasal corticosteroid drugs are widely used in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). In contrast to classical delivery with nasal pump sprays, pulsating aerosols can deliver significant doses into superior and posterior sinonasal spaces. A case-control study was designed to assess the efficacy of corticosteroid transnasal nebulization on short-term mucosal recovery and quality of life (QoL) following endoscopic sinus surgery in CRSwNP. Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled to receive either 1-month budesonide nasal pump spray or 1-month budesonide 100-Hz acoustic pulsating nebulization at the first postoperative visit (day 8). Patients were evaluated with Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score at day 8 (D8) and 1 month later (M1). CRS-related QoL questionnaires (SNOT22 and RhinoQOL) were fulfilled at M1. The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores compared between D8 and M1 were suggestively improved in the group treated with budesonide nebulization (mean difference between groups, - 18.28 units; 95%CI, - 31.29 to - 5.28 units, p = 0.014). QoL measurements were comparable at M1 between the groups of patients. No unexpected adverse event was described with both budesonide delivery protocols. In the early postoperative period, patients with CRswNP may benefit from pulsating nebulization. Large studies should be conducted to confirm the results. Safety profile related to systemic steroid absorption and bioavailability in chronic respiratory diseases also need to be addressed for further use.

Fast effectiveness of a solubilized low-dose budesonide nasal spray in allergic rhinitis

Background

Budesonide, a poorly water‐soluble corticosteroid, is currently marketed as a suspension. Budesolv is a novel aqueous formulation containing dissolved budesonide showing increased local availability in preclinical models. Budesolv contains ~85% less corticosteroid than the marketed comparator.

Objective

The study (EudraCT:2018‐001324‐19) was designed to assess non‐inferiority of Budesolv compared to Rhinocort® Aqua 64 (RA) and early onset of action.

Methods

In a three‐way cross‐over double‐blinded randomized trial, Budesolv 10 was compared to RA and placebo in grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis volunteers (n = 83 (ITT); n = 75 (PP)). On day 1, participants entered the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) for 6 hours; first treatment took place at 1:45 hours after entry. Participants treated themselves for further 6 days; on day 8, the last treatment was applied before entering the VCC. Subjective symptom scores, nasal airflow and nasal secretion were measured regularly during allergen challenge.

Results

Budesolv 10 was equally effective compared to RA with respect to TNSS and nasal airflow after eight days of treatment with a strongly reduced dose (more than 80% reduction). After first dose, only Budesolv 10 showed a significant reduction of nasal and respiratory symptoms starting 90 minutes (P < .05) and 15 minutes (P < .05) after application onwards, respectively, demonstrating an early onset of efficacy. A clinically significant 1 point reduction in nasal symptom score was reached at 195 minutes (P < .05) after application.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

The novel preservative‐free, aqueous low‐dose budesonide formulation is highly efficacious even after an initial single treatment. Thus, Budesolv 10 appears to be an effective acute treatment for allergic rhinitis as well as for AR comorbidities like mild asthma and conjunctivitis.

Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self-limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral aetiology, and even when the infection is bacterial, most cases resolve without antibiotics. However, antibiotics are still frequently and often inappropriately prescribed for the treatment of sore throat. Furthermore, topical (local) antibiotics for treatment of sore throat are widely available over the counter. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the evidence for the benefits, risk of harm and antimicrobial resistance associated with topical (local) antibiotics used for patients with sore throat.

METHODS

Eligible studies included those in patients with sore throat of any aetiology receiving the topical (local) antibiotics tyrothricin, bacitracin, gramicidin or neomycin where the antibiotic was topically/locally applied via the nasal cavity or throat. Nasal applications were included as these are occasionally used to treat upper respiratory tract infections that may involve sore throat. There was no restriction or requirement regarding comparator. The outcomes of interest included efficacy, safety, and in vitro culture and antimicrobial resistance data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This systematic review found sparse and mainly poor-quality evidence relating to the use of topical (local) antibiotics for sore throat, and it was not possible to establish the benefits, risk of harm or impact of use on antimicrobial resistance.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Further research is necessary to ascertain the risks and benefits of topical (local) antibiotics, their contribution to antimicrobial resistance and the risk of harm. We do, however, question whether it is appropriate and rational to use topical (local) antibiotics for the treatment of sore throat caused by respiratory tract infections in the absence of robust evidence.

Risks and management of long-term corticosteroid use in chronic rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the use and risks of long-term corticosteroids in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-term use of systemic corticosteroids is not indicated in the management of CRS due to the associated side effects and potential complications. Therefore, recent research has focused on the safety and efficacy of topical corticosteroid, particularly second-generation corticosteroids, and their modes of administration. Second-generation corticosteroids are more potent and have less systemic bioavailability than their first-generation counterparts. However, caution must be taken with concomitant use of more than two types of corticosteroids (topical, systemic, inhaled etc.) and also with their dosage and frequency of administration to avoid adrenal suppression, growth suppression in children, elevated intraocular pressure or epistaxis. Research is ongoing into therapies that may reduce corticosteroid resistance which has been demonstrated in some nasal polyps.

SUMMARY

Corticosteroids play an essential role in the management of CRS; however, use must be tailored to the patient-specific disease and requires ongoing review and regular reevaluation by their physician.

Effect of three-drug delivery modalities on olfactory function in chronic sinusitis

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction is deemed to be a significant contributor to poor quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess and to compare the effectiveness of three modalities of corticosteroids administration in patients with CRS.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled study

METHODS

Thirty patients with CRS were randomized in three groups depending on the route of corticosteroids administration: 16 days by oral route (Medrol (Pfizer, Belgique), 32 mg/8 days -16 mg/4 days-8 mg/4 days); nasal spray (Rhinocort (AstraZeneca, Belgique), 2 × 2 × 64 µg/nostril); or sonic nebulization (Pulmicort (AstraZeneca, Belgique), 2 × 1 mg/4 mL) (Sonic nebulizer, AOHBOX-NL11SN, DTF, France). Olfactory function was assessed using orthonasal threshold discrimination identification and retronasal psychophysical olfactory tests (RNT) before and after the treatment. Same intranasal modalities were previously tested for in vitro airways scintigraphic deposition.

RESULTS

In vitro differences in drug deposition pattern between both intranasal modalities were demonstrated. Threshold discrimination identification and RNT were similar between three groups at baseline. Threshold discrimination identification improved by 5.5, 5.8, and -1.1 for sonic nebulization, oral, and nasal spray groups, respectively (P = 0.010). This improvement was clinically relevant for oral and nebulized administration. It was similar between oral and nebulized administration but significantly higher than nasal spray administration. Retronasal psychophysical olfactory tests improved similarly for the three groups (P = 0.231) CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of sonic nebulized and oral administration is demonstrated on orthonasal olfactory. The clinical benefit is better than with nasal spray.

Validated assay for the simultaneous determination of cortisol and budesonide in human plasma using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

An ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the quantification of cortisol and budesonide in human plasma. Charcoal stripped human plasma was used as the blank matrix during validation. Cortisol, budesonide, and dexamethasone (internal standard) were extracted from human plasma with methyl-tert-butyl ether, and the chromatographic separation of the peaks was achieved using a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm column with a run time of 4.0 min. Cortisol, budesonide, and dexamethasone were monitored at the total ion current of their respective multiple reaction monitoring transition signals. The UHPLC/MS/MS system consisted of an Agilent 1290 Infinity ultra high performance liquid chromatograph coupled with an AB Sciex Qtrap(®) 5500 hybrid linear ion-trap triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The method was validated for accuracy, precision, linearity, range, selectivity, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), recovery, matrix effect, dilution integrity, and evaluation of carry-over. All validation parameters met the acceptance criteria according to regulatory guidelines. The LLOQ was 1.0 ng/mL for both compounds requiring 100 μL of sample. To our knowledge, this is the first validated LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of cortisol and budesonide in human plasma. The method was applied successfully in a clinical investigation of the impact of nasally administered Pulmicort (budesonide) on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

New therapeutic options for allergic rhinitis: back to the future with intranasal corticosteroid aerosols

BACKGROUND

Under current guidelines, intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are considered the most effective first-line therapy to improve allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms and burden of disease. In the late 1980s-1990s, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled corticosteroid aerosol nasal sprays formed the standard of care for the treatment of AR. Because of environmental concerns, CFC aerosols were gradually phased out, and aqueous INS formulations of nasal sprays became the standard of care. Although many aqueous INS sprays are available, specific product-related factors can reduce patient adherence to an INS and subsequently reduce treatment efficacy. The purpose of this paper was to review the evolution of AR therapeutics and drug devices and how it may have an effect on patient adherence/compliance and patient satisfaction with current available therapies and show the unmet need to improve INS delivery systems.

METHODS

Although aqueous INSs are effective and well tolerated, use in some patients may be compromised because of patient sensory perception and device preference. A historical review of the evolution of intranasal delivery of INSs was undertaken to provide further insight into improving treatment options for patients with AR.

RESULTS

Although the various approved INSs appear to be equivalent in terms of reducing AR disease burden, the method in which an INS is delivered to a patient has significant bearing on the overall success of each specific drug product.

CONCLUSION

Hydrofluoroalkane-propelled INS drug products offer a back-to-the-future delivery approach that may be further tailored to the individual patient's needs. Past experiences and the development of new devices are paving the way toward further therapy choices, ultimately affording health care providers access to the most effective treatments for patients with AR.

Safety, Tolerability, and Exposure of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray in Healthy and Asymptomatic Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Ciclesonide is an intranasal corticosteroid in development for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide, adult healthy volunteers and asymptomatic subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive intranasal ciclesonide or placebo for 14 days. Serum concentrations of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrometric detection, with lower limits of quantification of 25 and 10 pg/mL, respectively. Adrenal function was monitored by diurnal serum free and 24-hour urine cortisol concentrations. Despite the use of a sensitive assay and a high ciclesonide dose (800 microg/d), serum levels of ciclesonide and desisobutyryl-ciclesonide were below the lower limits of quantification for the majority of samples assayed. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and did not appear to affect serum or urine free cortisol levels. The low systemic exposure and favorable safety profile support the continued clinical development of ciclesonide nasal spray.

Impact of mometasone furoate nasal spray on individual ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are a mainstay of treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) nasal symptoms. The INS mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) has well-documented efficacy and safety for the treatment and prophylaxis of nasal symptoms of seasonal AR (SAR) and for the treatment of nasal symptoms of perennial AR (PAR). Increasing interest has focused on whether INSs, including MFNS, may have beneficial effects on the ocular symptoms frequently associated with AR.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of 10 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the efficacy of MFNS 200 mcg daily in relieving ocular allergy symptoms, including itching/burning, redness, and tearing/watering in both SAR and PAR. Four PAR studies and six SAR studies are included in the analysis. A fixed-effect inverse variance model was used to calculate weighted mean differences, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison, and a combined overall treatment effect (Z) with P-value.

RESULTS

In both analyses of SAR and PAR studies, including 3132 patients, all individual ocular symptoms were reduced in patients treated with MFNS. Overall treatment effect was significant for all three individual ocular symptoms in the SAR studies (Z = 9.18 for tearing, Z = 10.15 for itching, and Z = 8.88 for redness; P < 0.00001 for all) and in the PAR studies (Z = 5.94, P < 0.00001 for tearing; Z = 2.43, P = 0.02 for itching; and Z = 2.42, P = 0.02 for redness).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings add to the growing body of literature supporting the positive class effect of INSs, including MFNS, on ocular symptoms associated with SAR and PAR.

Intranasal Mometasone Furoate for Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic nasal disease that affects the upper respiratory tract. This disorder is characterized by inflammation of the mucous membranes and it manifests with several nasal symptoms accompanied sometimes by non-nasal symptoms. Best therapy aims to prevent and improve the AR-clinical picture. Steroids have an important role in the treatment of AR. The development of steroids administrated directly on nasal mucosa has much reduced the systemic adverse affects associated with oral steroids therapy. Mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray is a synthetic steroid assessed for intranasal use in the therapy of adults and children affected by AR. Such topical nasal steroid is an effective molecule improving clinical picture of AR and it is also approved as prophylactic therapy. In this article, apart from a careful description of its successful clinical use the authors review pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of such steroid molecule.

Development of budesonide microparticles using spray-drying technology for pulmonary administration: design, characterization, in vitro evaluation, and in vivo efficacy study

The purpose of this research was to generate, characterize, and investigate the in vivo efficacy of budesonide (BUD) microparticles prepared by spray-drying technology with a potential application as carriers for pulmonary administration with sustained-release profile and improved respirable fraction. Microspheres and porous particles of chitosan (drug/chitosan, 1:2) were prepared by spray drying using optimized process parameters and were characterized for different physicochemical parameters. Mass median aerodynamic diameter and geometric standard deviation for conventional, microspheres, and porous particles formulations were 2.75, 4.60, and 4.30 microm and 2.56, 1.75, and 2.54, respectively. Pharmacokinetic study was performed in rats by intratracheal administration of either placebo or developed dry powder inhalation (DPI) formulation. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (Ka, Ke, T(max), C(max), AUC, and Vd) and these results indicated that developed formulations extended half life compared to conventional formulation with onefold to fourfold improved local and systemic bioavailability. Estimates of relative bioavailability suggested that developed formulations have excellent lung deposition characteristics with extended T(1/2) from 9.4 to 14 h compared to conventional formulation. Anti-inflammatory activity of BUD and developed formulations was compared and found to be similar. Cytotoxicity was determined in A549 alveolar epithelial cell line and found to be not toxic. In vivo pulmonary deposition of developed conventional formulation was studied using gamma scintigraphy and results indicated potential in vitro-in vivo correlation in performance of conventional BUD DPI formulation. From the DPI formulation prepared with porous particles, the concentration of BUD increased fourfold in the lungs, indicating pulmonary targeting potential of developed formulations.

Dissolution in nasal fluid, retention and anti-inflammatory activity of fluticasone furoate in human nasal tissue ex vivo

BACKGROUND

Intranasal glucocorticoids represent the most effective pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis. So far, no clinical data are available that compare fluticasone furoate (FF) with other intranasally applied glucocorticoids.

OBJECTIVE

Because the pharmacokinetic behaviour of drugs governs their presence at the therapeutic target site we analysed selected in vitro properties of FF in comparison with triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), budesonide (Bud), fluticasone propionate (FP) and mometasone furoate (MF). Additionally, we determined the anti-inflammatory activity of the glucocorticoid fraction residing in human nasal tissue samples after washing.

METHODS

We analysed the solubility of the compounds in artificial human nasal fluid and the retention in human nasal tissue as well as typical spray volumes of commercially available drug preparations. As an anti-inflammatory measure, we evaluated the inhibition of IL-8 release from epithelial cells.

RESULTS

FF is delivered in the smallest application volume per spray. Despite the low aqueous solubility of glucocorticoids, a fraction of the compounds is already dissolved in the aqueous supernatants of drug preparations (Bud>TCA>FP>MF>FF). The dissolution of FP, MF and FF was significantly enhanced in artificial nasal fluid and FF displayed the most pronounced enhancement of solubility in the presence of proteins. Consistent with this result, the highest retention in nasal tissue was observed for FF, followed by FP>MF>Bud>TCA. After washing of the nasal tissue samples, all compounds inhibited IL-8 release, with FF displaying the highest activity.

CONCLUSION

FF displayed beneficial properties for nasal application. Its low application volume per spray is a prerequisite for effective drug utilization by avoiding immediate loss by nose runoff or drip down the throat. Sustained dissolution and high tissue binding of FF should contribute towards an extended presence of compounds in nasal tissue as a basis for a prolonged pharmacologic activity.

Intranasally administered corticosteroids and neuropsychiatric disturbances: a review of the international pharmacovigilance programme of the World Health Organization

BACKGROUND

The systemic use of corticosteroids is connected with a variety of psychiatric and neurologic effects. Corticosteroids for intranasal administration (INCs) are considered to act locally and to exert minimal systemic effects. An unexpected cluster of case reports of neuropsychiatric disorders during intranasal corticosteroid use was reported to the World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possible connection between intranasal corticosteroid use and the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, as reported to the International Pharmacovigilance Programme.

METHODS

All reports containing adverse event terms indicating neuropsychiatric disturbances in suspected connection with intranasal corticosteroids were retrieved from Vigibase and evaluated (April 2006). The case reports are heterogeneous and vary regarding source, documentation quality, and relationship likelihood.

RESULTS

A total of 429 reports were received from 16 countries (1980-April 2006), of neuropsychiatric events occurring in patients using INCs, representing 7.6% of the total of reports regarding these drugs in the same period. Frequently reported events were nervousness, anxiety, agitation, insomnia, emotional lability, depression, somnolence, confusion, convulsions, and migraine. Most reports concerned fluticasone propionate, beclometasone dipropionate, mometasone furoate, or budesonide. In 370 reports (86.2%), the INC was the sole suspect drug and in 220 (51.3%) it was the only drug used. In 97 of 108 patients who had discontinued use of the intranasal corticosteroid, the reaction abated. Of 41 patients, 32 had a relapse when the drug was reintroduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The data collected by the International Pharmacovigilance Programme suggest that the intranasal use of corticosteroids can be complicated by neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Further study is needed to confirm the connection and to determine the frequency and risk factors of such reactions.

Randomised, crossover clinical trial, in healthy volunteers, to compare the systemic availability of two topical intranasal budesonide formulations

BACKGROUND

Budesonide has a long history as intranasal drug, with many marketed products. Efforts should be made to demonstrate the therapeutic equivalence and safety comparability between them. Given that systemic availability significantly varies from formulations, the clinical comparability of diverse products comes to be of clinical interest and a regulatory requirement. The aim of the present study was to compare the systemic availability, pharmacodynamic effect, and safety of two intranasal budesonide formulations for the treatment of rhinitis.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers participated in this randomised, controlled, crossover, clinical trial. On two separated days, subjects received a single dose of 512 mug budesonide (4 puffs per nostril) from each of the assayed devices (Budesonida nasal 64(R), Aldo-Union, Spain and Rhinocort 64(R), AstraZeneca, Spain). Budesonide availability was determined by the measurement of budesonide plasma concentration. The pharmacodynamic effect on the hypothalamic-adrenal axis was evaluated as both plasma and urine cortisol levels. Adverse events were tabulated and described. Budesonide availability between formulations was compared by the calculation of 90%CI intervals of the ratios of the main pharmacokinetic parameters describing budesonide bioavailability. Plasma cortisol concentration-time curves were compared by means of a GLM for Repeated Measures. Urine cortisol excretion between formulations was compared through the Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

All the enrolled volunteers successfully completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable in terms of AUC(t) (2.6 +/- 1.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.7), AUC(i) (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs 2.4 +/- 0.7), t(max) (0.4 +/- 0.1 vs 0.4 +/- 0.2), C(max)/AUC(i) (0.3 +/- 0.1 vs 0.3 +/- 0.0), and MRT (5.0 +/- 1.4 vs 4.5 +/- 0.6), but not in the case of C(max) (0.9 +/- 0.3 vs 0.7 +/- 0.2) and t(1/2) (3.7 +/- 1.8 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4). The pharmacodynamic effects, measured as the effect over plasma and urine cortisol, were also comparables between both formulations. No severe adverse events were reported and tolerance was comparable between formulations.

CONCLUSION

The systemic availability of intranasal budesonide was comparable for both formulations in terms of most pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacodynamic effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was also similar. Side effects were scarce and equivalent between the two products. This methodology to compare different budesonide-containing devices is reliable and easy to perform, and should be recommended for similar products intented to be marketed or already on the market.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No Eudra CT: 2005-003727-39.

Inhaled budesonide in the management of acute worsenings and exacerbations of asthma: a review of the evidence

The use of systemic corticosteroids, together with bronchodilators and oxygen therapy, has become established for the management of acute asthma. These agents are undoubtedly effective, but are also associated with problems such as metabolic adverse effects. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) offer potential benefit in the acute setting because they are delivered directly to the airways. They are also likely to reduce systemic exposure, which would lead in turn to reductions in rates of unwanted systemic effects. In order to evaluate the role of budesonide in the management of acute asthma exacerbations we conducted a review of the literature and critically evaluated the rationale for the use of ICS in general in this setting. Trials in adults and children requiring treatment for acute exacerbation of asthma have shown clinical and/or spirometric benefit for budesonide when delivered via nebulizer, dry powder inhaler, or aerosol in the emergency department, hospital and follow-up settings. The efficacy seems to benefit from high doses given repeatedly during the initial phase of an acute exacerbation. These acute effects are likely to be linked to the drug's distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. The current evidence base revealed encouraging results regarding the efficacy of the ICS budesonide in patients with wheeze and acute worsening of asthma. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of these agents in more severe asthma worsenings.

Effects of glucocorticoids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children and adults

Inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids are widely used as effective, first-line treatments for asthma and allergic rhinitis. Despite a good safety profile of these formulations, there is increasing concern about their propensity to produce systemic adverse effects. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is one of the most important potential complications. This article reviews the effects of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults and children.

A review of pregnancy outcomes after exposure to orally inhaled or intranasal budesonide

BACKGROUND

Inadequately controlled rhinitis is associated with worsening asthma, one of the most common potentially serious causes of pregnancy complications. Recent evidence-based guidelines now stress the importance of inhaled corticosteroids as first-line therapy in controlling asthma during pregnancy, with preference given to budesonide. Both inhaled and intranasal budesonide formulations are rated Pregnancy Category B; all other inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids are rated Pregnancy Category C.

OBJECTIVE

To review data from clinical and epidemiological studies investigating the effects of orally inhaled or intranasal budesonide on pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical and epidemiological studies on the effects of maternal exposure to orally inhaled or intranasal budesonide were identified through searches of the literature indexed on Medline or the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) database through January 2005. The search terms used were: 'budesonide' and 'pregnancy'; 'pregnancy complications'; 'teratogens'; 'fetus'; 'embryo'; or 'toxicology'. The search was limited to English-language articles and those evaluating humans. Pertinent abstracts were identified from recent US asthma and allergy meetings.

RESULTS

A total of five articles and three abstracts meeting the search criteria were identified. Retrospective epidemiological studies and a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial found no clinically or statistically significant effects on fetal outcomes among more than 6600 infants whose mothers were exposed to orally inhaled budesonide during pregnancy. Women who reported use of orally inhaled budesonide either during early pregnancy only or throughout pregnancy gave birth to infants of normal gestational age, birth weight, and length, with no increased rate of stillbirths, multiple births, or congenital malformations. In a retrospective case-control analysis, no association was found between inhaled budesonide or intranasal budesonide and the overall rate of infant cardiovascular defects. However, a marginally increased risk of less severe cardiovascular defects (odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.46) was observed with intranasal budesonide in one analysis, possibly the result of a random association due to multiple testing or an unidentified confounder.

CONCLUSION

Maternal exposure to orally inhaled budesonide during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations or other adverse fetal outcomes in studies of more than 6600 infants. Data on pregnancy outcomes after maternal exposure to intranasal budesonide are limited, but the totality of evidence, including pharmacological studies showing a much lower systemic exposure after intranasal administration, indicates its safety profile is at least comparable with that of orally inhaled budesonide.

Relationship between systemic corticosteroid exposure and growth velocity: development and validation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

BACKGROUND

Use of high-dose oral corticosteroids (CSs) can reduce growth velocity (GV) in children, whereas use of low-dose topical CSs has either no effect or transient effects on short-term growth and no effect on final adult height Despite the large body of literature on this topic, some fundamental questions remain concerning the relationship between CS exposure and growth effects.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine the relationship between CS exposure and GV in children receiving CS therapy for asthma or rhinitis, and to examine whether there is likely to be a link between GV and cortisol suppression.

METHODS

Data from 32 published studies of the effect on growth of inhaled, intranasal, and oral CSs, including delivery by dry powder inhaler, metered-dose inhaler, and aqueous nasal spray, were consolidated by expressing CS exposure in cortisol equivalents using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach. The relationship between change in GV and CS exposure in cortisol equivalents was described using a nonlinear sigmoid maximum-effect (E(max)) model with the following parameters: E(max) = -5.9 cm/y; steady-state unbound AUC for 50% reduction in GV, in cortisol equivalents = 20,000 ng.h/L; Hill constant = 1.2; and change in GV at zero systemic exposure = 0.06 cm/y. Validation was achieved by comparing the model's predictions with data from 5 studies that were not included in the model development The model was also used to predict the potential of various CS regimens to reduce GV.

RESULTS

Exploratory data analysis established that change in GV was highly correlated with exposure in cortisol equivalents (P < 0.001). CSs with high systemic bioavailability by the intranasal route were predicted to have short-term growth effects exceeding the clinical equivalence limit for change in GV (+/-0.8 cm/y), whereas those with lower bioavailability were predicted to produce systemic exposures below the threshold for significant effects on GV The findings were similar for inhaled CSs and for regimens combining delivery by the intranasal and inhaled routes. In descending order, the model predicted the following ranking of the potential of the various intranasal, inhaled, and oral regimens to reduce GV, expressed as fractions or multiples of the pediatric dose (in microg/d): oral prednisolone 5000 microg/d, 0.14; inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate metered-dose inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.54; inhaled budesonide dry powder inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.66; intranasal triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray 220 microg/d, 0.74; inhaled triamcinolone acetonide metered-dose inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.75; intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 336 pg/d, 0.89; inhaled mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler 200 microg/d, 2.4; intranasal budesonide aqueous nasal spray 128 microg/d, 2.5; inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler 200 microg/d, 2.6; intranasal mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray 100 microg/d, 120; and intranasal fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 100 pg/d, 150. Values >1 are predictive of no significant effect on GV. The model predicted that a 10% to 15% reduction in plasma cortisol concentration should be detectable at the lower equivalence limit for growth reduction (-0.8 cm/y). The validation procedure showed that the model was capable of predicting the results of the 5 comparative growth studies not included in model development with a correlation coefficient of 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Growth effects appear to be nonlinearly related to CS exposure; therefore, no-effect exposure should be possible for CSs with low systemic exposure. Growth inhibition appears unlikely to occur in the absence of detectable reductions in cortisol concentrations.

Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids and intranasal antihistamines are efficacious topical therapies in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. This review addresses their relative roles in the management of this disease, focusing on their safety and tolerability profiles. The intranasal route of administration delivers drug directly to the target organ, thereby minimising the potential for the systemic adverse effects that may be evident with oral therapy. Furthermore, the topical route of delivery enables the use of lower doses of medication. Such therapies, predominantly available as aqueous formulations following the ban of chlorofluorocarbon propellants, have minimal local adverse effects. Intranasal application of therapy can induce sneezing in the hyper-reactive nose, and transient local irritation has been described with certain formulations. Intranasal administration of corticosteroids is associated with minor nose bleeding in a small proportion of recipients. This effect has been attributed to the vasoconstrictor activity of the corticosteroid molecules, and is considered to account for the very rare occurrence of nasal septal perforation. Nasal biopsy studies do not show any detrimental structural effects within the nasal mucosa with long-term administration of intranasal corticosteroids. Much attention has focused on the systemic safety of intranasal application. When administered at standard recommended therapeutic dosage, the intranasal antihistamines do not cause significant sedation or impairment of psychomotor function, effects that would be evident when these agents are administered orally at a therapeutically relevant dosage. The systemic bioavailability of intranasal corticosteroids varies from <1% to up to 40-50% and influences the risk of systemic adverse effects. Because the dose delivered topically is small, this is not a major consideration, and extensive studies have not identified significant effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis with continued treatment. A small effect on growth has been reported in one study in children receiving a standard dosage over 1 year, however. This has not been found in prospective studies with the intranasal corticosteroids that have low systemic bioavailability and therefore the judicious choice of intranasal formulation, particularly if there is concurrent corticosteroid inhalation for asthma, is prudent. There is no evidence that such considerations are relevant to shorter-term use, such as in intermittent or seasonal disease. Intranasal therapy, which represents a major mode of drug delivery in allergic rhinitis, thus has a very favourable benefit/risk ratio and is the preferred route of administration for corticosteroids in the treatment of this disease, as well as an important option for antihistaminic therapy, particularly if rapid symptom relief is required.

Budesonide fatty-acid esterification: a novel mechanism prolonging binding to airway tissue. Review of available data

AIMS

Evidence is accumulating that budesonide (BUD) forms intracellular esters in airways. which may affect both duration of action and therapeutic ratio of this drug. The aim of the present paper is to review the preclinical and human experimental evidence supporting the esterification of BUD, and to discuss the clinical implications this may have on asthma and rhinitis treatment.

RESULTS

After inhalation, intact BUD binds primarily to available steroid receptors, and mainly excess (unbound) BUD is esterified. Esterification of BUD is a rapid process: within 20 minutes of inhalation in the rat of radiolabeled BUD, approximately 80% of radioactivity within the trachea and main bronchi was associated with BUD esters, primarily BUD oleate. After 4 hours, the proportion of BUD esters/total cellular BUD was typically 40 to 50% for lung, 70 to 90% for trachea, and only 10 to 15% for peripheral muscle. Comparative in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that esterification prolongs BUD's anti-inflammatory activity longer than that of corticosteroids that can not form esters. Clinical studies have confirmed the prolonged presence of BUD esters, as well as intact BUD, in human airway tissues: 6 hours postdosing, nasal biopsy concentrations of intact BUD were >10-fold greater than those of fluticasone propionate and at 24 hours BUD was detectable in threefold more biopsies than fluticasone propionate. The impact of esterification on airway selectivity of BUD has also been demonstrated in vivo and using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models.

CONCLUSIONS

BUD is retained in airways as esters, a novel kinetic mechanism for synthetic glucocorticoids. In preclinical studies this esterification is correlated to a prolonged local tissue binding and efficacy, which is not found when the esterification is inhibited by an esterification blocker. Because less esters are formed in the systemic compartment than in airways/lung, the local benefit:systemic risk ratio may also be improved by this mechanism. BUD possesses favorable clinical properties, including its approved once-daily efficacy in asthma, which is probably in part attributable to esterification. However, a direct proof of the latter in patients requires effective and safe inhibitors of the esterification, which are not yet available. Therefore, evidence to support the therapeutic impact of esterification is still circumstantial.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of inhaled budesonide

The corticosteroid budesonide is a 1:1 racemic mixture of 2 epimers, (22R)- and (22S)-, and is available in 3 different inhaled formulations for the management of asthma: a pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI), a dry powder inhaler (DPI) and a solution for nebulised therapy. Inhaled corticosteroids such as budesonide reach the systemic circulation either by direct absorption through the lungs (a route that is much more important than previously recognised) or via gastrointestinal absorption of drug that is inadvertently swallowed. Although the pharmacokinetics of budesonide have been extensively investigated following oral and intravenous administration, relatively few studies have defined the systemic disposition of budesonide after inhalation. Drug deposition in the lungs depends on the inhaler device: 15% of the metered dose of budesonide reached the lung with a pMDI compared with 32% with a breath-actuated DPI. In patients with asthma (n = 38) receiving different doses of budesonide by DPI (Turbuhaler), the pharmacokinetic parameters peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were dose-dependent after both single dose and repeat dose (3 weeks) administration: time to Cmax (tmax) was short (0.28 to 0.40 hours) and the elimination half-life approximately 3 hours. Both AUC and Cmax were linearly related to budesonide dose. In a small group of healthy male volunteers (n = 9), the pharmacokinetics of budesonide 1,600 microg twice daily via pMDI were assessed on the fifth day of administration. Mean model-independent parameters for (22R)-budesonide were as follows: Cmax 1.8 microg/L, tmax 0.46 hours, elimination half-life 2.3 hours and oral clearance 163 L/h, and there were no enantiomer-specific differences in drug disposition. Budesonide undergoes fatty acid conjugation within the lung, but very limited pharmacokinetic data are available to define the pulmonary absorption characteristics. There is evidence from a population analysis that the pulmonary absorption of budesonide is prolonged and shows wide interindividual variation. Further pharmacokinetic studies are required to define the time-course of budesonide absorption through the lung in specific patient groups, and to investigate the effect of new inhaler devices (especially chlorofluorocarbon-free pMDIs) on the pharmacokinetic profile and systemic drug exposure.

Clinical prescribing of allergic rhinitis medication in the preschool and young school-age child: what are the options?

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common chronic condition in children and is estimated to affect up to 40% of all children. It is usually diagnosed by the age of 6 years. The major impact in children is due to co-morbidity of sinusitis, otitis media with effusion, and bronchial asthma. AR also has profound effects on school absenteeism, performance and quality of life. Pharmacotherapy for AR should be based on the severity and duration of signs and symptoms. For mild, intermittent symptoms lasting a few hours to a few days, an oral second-generation antihistamine should be used on an as-needed basis. This is preferable to a less expensive first-generation antihistamine because of the effect of the latter on sedation and cognition. Four second-generation antihistamines are currently available for children under 12 years of age: cetirizine, loratadine, fexofenadine and azelastine nasal spray; each has been found to be well tolerated and effective. There are no clearcut advantages to distinguish these antihistamines, although for children under 5 years of age, only cetirizine and loratadine are approved. Other agents include pseudoephedrine, an oral vasoconstrictor, for nasal congestion, and the anticholinergic nasal spray ipratropium bromide for rhinorrhoea. Sodium cromoglycate, a mast cell stabiliser nasal spray, may also be useful in this population. For patients with more persistent, severe symptoms, intranasal corticosteroids are indicated, although one might consider azelastine nasal spray, which has anti- inflammatory activity in addition to its antihistamine effect. With the exception of fluticasone propionate for children aged 4 years and older, and mometasone furoate for those aged 3 years and older, the other intranasal corticosteroids including beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone, flunisolide and budesonide are approved for children aged 6 years and older. All are effective, so a major consideration would be cost and safety. For short term therapy of 1 to 2 months, the first-generation intranasal corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone, budesonide and flunisolide) could be used, and mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate could be considered for longer-term treatment. Although somewhat more costly, these second-generation drugs have lower bioavailability and thus would have a better safety profile. In patients not responding to the above programme or who require continuous medication, identification of specific triggers by an allergist can allow for specific avoidance measures and/or immunotherapy to decrease the allergic component and increase the effectiveness of the pharmacological regimen.

Beclomethasone dipropionate: absolute bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and metabolism following intravenous, oral, intranasal and inhaled administration in man

AIMS

To assess the absolute bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in man following intravenous, oral, intranasal and inhaled administration.

METHODS

Twelve healthy subjects participated in this seven-way cross-over study where BDP was administered via the following routes: intravenous infusion (1000 microg), oral (4000 microg, aqueous suspension), intranasal (1344 microg, aqueous nasal spray) and inhaled (1000 microg ex-valve, metered dose inhaler). The contribution of the lung, nose and gut to the systemic exposure was assessed by repeating the inhaled, intranasal and oral dosing arms together with activated charcoal, to block oral absorption. Blood samples were collected for 24 h postdose for the measurement of BDP, beclomethasone-17-monopropionate (B-17-MP) and beclomethasone (BOH) in plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Intravenous administration of BDP (mean CL 150 l h-1, Vss 20 l, t(1/2) 0.5 h) was associated with rapid conversion to B-17-MP which was eliminated more slowly (t1/2 2.7 h). In estimating the parameters for B-17-MP (mean CL 120 l h-1, Vss 424 l) complete conversion of BDP to B-17-MP was assumed. The resultant plasma concentrations of BOH were low and transient. BDP was not detected in plasma following oral or intranasal dosing. The mean absolute bioavailability (%F, 90% CI; nominal doses) of inhaled BDP was 2% (1-4%) and not reduced by coadministration of charcoal. The mean percentage F of the active metabolite B-17-MP was 41% (31-54%), 44% (34-58%) and 62% (47-82%) for oral, intranasal and inhaled dosing without charcoal, respectively. The corresponding estimates of nasal and lung absorption, based on the coadministration of charcoal, were < 1% and 36% (27-47%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Unchanged BDP has negligible oral and intranasal bioavailability with limited absorption following inhaled dosing due to extensive (95%) presystemic conversion of BDP to B-17-MP in the lung. The oral and intranasal bioavailabilities of the active metabolite B-17-MP were high and similar, but direct absorption in the nose was insignificant. The total inhaled bioavailability of B-17-MP (lung + oral) was also high (62%) and approximately 36% of this was due to pulmonary absorption. Estimates of oral bioavailability and pulmonary deposition based on total BOH were approximately half those found for B-17-MP.

Nasal retention of budesonide and fluticasone in man: formation of airway mucosal budesonide-esters in vivo

AIMS

The efficacy of topical glucocorticosteroids in rhinitis and asthma is likely to depend on drug retention in the airway mucosa. With fluticasone propionate, retention may be achieved exclusively by lipophilicity, whereas for budesonide an additional possibility may be provided by its ability to form fatty acid esters in the airway mucosa that release the active drug. The aim of the present study was to determine the nasal mucosal retention of budesonide and fluticasone propionate, and the occurrence of budesonide-esters (budesonide-oleate, budesonide-palmitate) in the nasal mucosa.

METHODS

In the present study, involving 24 healthy subjects, we have examined nasal mucosal drug retention of single doses of topical budesonide (256 microg) and fluticasone propionate (200 microg). Treatments were given consecutively and the administration sequence was randomised. Subjects were randomised into four parallel groups and two nasal biopsies were taken from each subject, i.e. before and at 2 h, at 2 and 6 h, at 6 and 24 h, or before and at 24 h after drug administration, resulting in 12 biopsies/time point. The measurement of unesterified budesonide, budesonide-oleate, budesonide-palmitate, and fluticasone propionate was based on microwave extraction procedures combined with liquid-chromatography/tandem mass-spectrometry.

RESULTS

Neither of the analytes was detected in samples taken before glucocorticosteroid administration. After administration, unesterified budesonide, budesonide-esters, and fluticasone propionate were detected in the tissue from 23, 20, and 19 subjects, respectively. The mean tissue levels of budesonide at 2 and 6 h were 1051 and 176 pmol g(-1); the mean levels of fluticasone propionate at these time points were 237 and 10 pmol g(-1). The dose-corrected budesonide/fluticasone propionate tissue concentration ratios were 3.5 (P = 0.07) and 13.7 (P < 0.0002), respectively. At 24 h, budesonide and fluticasone propionate were detected in 8/12 and 3/12 of the biopsies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates the formation of budesonide-esters in the human nasal mucosa in vivo, and that budesonide is retained in the nasal mucosa to a greater extent than fluticasone propionate. It is suggested that the formation of budesonide-esters and their subsequent release of budesonide contributes to an extended retention of budesonide in the airway mucosa.

Systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate administered as nasal drops and aqueous nasal spray formulations

AIMS

To measure and compare the systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and a new nasal drop formulation, using a sensitive analytical method and high dose regimen.

METHODS

Volunteers received four 800 microg doses of fluticasone propionate as a nasal spray or drops over 2 days, separated by an 8 h dose interval. On day 2, blood samples were collected for assay of fluticasone propionate plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

The mean systemic exposure, for both formulations was 8.5 pg x ml(-1) x h (drops) and 67.5 pg x ml(-1) x h (spray). Mean absolute bioavailabilities were estimated to be 0.06% (drops) and 0.51% (spray), by reference to historical intravenous data.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations exhibited low systemic bioavailability, even at 12 times the normal daily dose. The bioavailability from the nasal drops was approximately eight times lower than from the nasal spray.

Systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate administered as nasal drops and aqueous nasal spray formulations

AIMS

To measure and compare the systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and a new nasal drop formulation, using a sensitive analytical method and high dose regimen.

METHODS

Volunteers received four 800 microg doses of fluticasone propionate as a nasal spray or drops over 2 days, separated by an 8 h dose interval. On day 2, blood samples were collected for assay of fluticasone propionate plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

The mean systemic exposure, for both formulations was 8.5 pg x ml(-1) x h (drops) and 67.5 pg x ml(-1) x h (spray). Mean absolute bioavailabilities were estimated to be 0.06% (drops) and 0.51% (spray), by reference to historical intravenous data.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations exhibited low systemic bioavailability, even at 12 times the normal daily dose. The bioavailability from the nasal drops was approximately eight times lower than from the nasal spray.

Commentary on the FDA draft guidance for bioequivalence studies for nasal aerosols and nasal sprays for local action: an industry view

In June 1999, the Food and Drug Administration issued draft guidance for bioequivalence studies for nasal aerosols and nasal sprays for local action. The purpose of this opinion paper is to highlight the need for a balanced scientific debate before this guidance is used by underscoring the areas in the document that are in opposition to prevailing scientific understanding.

Safety of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids: lessons for the new millennium

Although inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids are first-line therapy for asthma and allergic rhinitis, there has recently been an increasing awareness of their propensity to produce systemic adverse effects. The availability of more potent and lipophilic corticosteroids and new chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free formulations has focused attention on these safety issues. The main determinant of systemic bioavailability of these drugs is direct absorption from the lung or nose, where there is no first-pass inactivation. Consequently, the systemic bioavailability of inhaled corticosteroids is greatly influenced by the efficiency of the inhaler device. Thus, when comparing different inhaled corticosteroids it is imperative to consider the unique drug/device interaction. The pharmacokinetic profile is important in determining the systemic bioactivity of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids. For highly lipophilic drugs, such as fluticasone propionate or mometasone furoate, there is preferential partitioning into the systemic tissue compartment, and consequently a large volume of distribution at steady state. In contrast, drugs with lower lipophilicity, such as triamcinolone acetonide or budesonide, have a smaller volume of distribution. The systemic tissue compartment may act as a slow release reservoir, resulting in a long elimination half-life for the lipophilic drugs. For intranasal corticosteroids, a high degree of lipophilicity diminishes water solubility in mucosa and therefore increases the amount of drug swept away by mucociliary clearance before it can gain access to tissue receptor sites. This may reduce the anti-inflammatory efficacy in the nose, but might also reduce the propensity for direct systemic absorption from the nasal cavity. The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate are solutions and exhibit a much higher respirable fine particle dose than do the CFC formulations. Dose-response studies with one of the HFA formulations have shown therapeutic equivalence at half the dosage, with little evidence of adrenal suppression at dosages up to 800 microg/day. A lack of similar studies for another of the available HFA formulations has led to a discrepancy in the recommendations for equivalence. Although in vitro studies have pointed to a similar fine particle distribution for the HFA and CFC formulations of fluticasone propionate, this is not supported by in vivo data for lung bioavailability, suggesting that care will be required when switching these formulations. Prescribers of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids should be aware of the potential for long term systemic effects. The safest way to use these drugs is to 'step-down' to achieve the lowest possible effective maintenance dosage.

Current status of topical nasal antimicrobial agents

The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are probably one of the last frontiers in the head and neck region where the use of topical antimicrobial agents is not yet established. Although the anatomy of the nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses can theoretically be exploited for the administration of antimicrobials in rhinosinusitis, very few studies have been conducted to test the feasibility of this mode of therapy. We review the anatomical and physiological factors that should be considered in the use of topical nasal antimicrobial agents and the current status of topical nasal antimicrobial usage, and we make recommendations for the administration of topical nasal antimicrobial agents.